| Name | Project | Type | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pamplona | OPEN4CEC | PED Lab | Compare |
| Trondheim, Svartlamon | OPEN4CEC | PED Lab | Compare |
| Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus | OPEN4CEC | PED Lab | Compare |
| Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente | COPPER | PED Lab | Compare |
| Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) | PED StepWise | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park | PED StepWise | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten | PED StepWise | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg | HeatCOOP | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH | HeatCOOP | PED Lab | Compare |
| Tartu, Annelinn | V2G-QUESTS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Utrecht, Kanaleneiland | V2G-QUESTS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Aveiro, Aradas district | V2G-QUESTS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Győr Geothermal District Heating Project | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| SmartEnCity, Lecce | SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| STARDUST, Trento | STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Uncompare |
| Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
| mySMARTlife, Helsinki | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Sinfonia, Bolzano | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Hunziker Areal, Zürich | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Sharing Cities, Milano | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Smart Otaniemi, Espoo | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
| Zukunftsquartier, Vienna | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Barrio La Pinada, Paterna | PED Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
| Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Võru +CityxChange | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Furuset project, Oslo | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Laser Valley – Land of Lights | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Ydalir project | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Uncompare |
| NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Fornebu, Bærum | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Fleuraye west, Carquefou | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Smart Energy Åland | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Romania, Alba Iulia PED | ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Romania, Alba Iulia PED | InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Munich, Harthof district | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Lublin | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran | CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Bærum, Eiksveien 116 | CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Findhorn, the Park | InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED | ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Umeå, Ålidhem district | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Aalborg East | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
| Ankara, Çamlık District | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
| Trenčín | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Luxembourg, Betzdorf | LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Vantaa, Aviapolis | NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Vidin, Himik and Bononia | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Oslo, Verksbyen | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Uden, Loopkantstraat | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Zaragoza, Actur | NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Aarhus, Brabrand | BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city | ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Izmir, District of Karşıyaka | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus | LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes | PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
| Espoo, Kera | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
| Freiburg, Waldsee | PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Graz, Reininghausgründe | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Oulu, Kaukovainio | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Halmstad, Fyllinge | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Lund, Brunnshög district | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Vienna, Am Kempelenpark | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Évora, Portugal | POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Groningen, PED South | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Lab | Compare |
| Groningen, PED North | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Lab | |
| Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Lab | Compare |
| Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT | PED Lab | Compare | |
| Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district | STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Leon, Former Sugar Factory district | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Salzburg, Gneis district | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Tartu, City centre area | SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district | GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab | PED Lab | Compare | |
| Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Kifissia, Energy community | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Title | Groningen, PED North | STARDUST, Trento | Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus | Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio | Ydalir project, Elverum | Ankara, Çamlık District |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||
| A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab | Groningen, PED North | STARDUST, Trento | Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus | Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio | Ydalir project, Elverum | Ankara, Çamlık District |
| A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet | ||||||
| A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet |
|
| ||||
| A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site | ||||||
| PED case study | no | no | no | no | yes | yes |
| PED relevant case study | no | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
| PED Lab. | yes | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||
| Climate neutrality | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| Annual energy surplus | yes | no | no | yes | no | yes |
| Energy community | yes | no | no | yes | no | yes |
| Circularity | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
| Air quality and urban comfort | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| Electrification | no | no | yes | yes | no | yes |
| Net-zero energy cost | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| Net-zero emission | yes | no | no | no | yes | yes |
| Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous) | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| Maximise self-sufficiency | no | no | no | yes | no | yes |
| Other | no | yes | yes | no | yes | no |
| Other (A1P004) | Energy neutral; Energy efficient; Sustainable neighbourhood | almost nZEB district | Energy efficient; Sustainable neighbourhood; Energy neutral | |||
| A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||
| A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED Lab | Implementation Phase | Completed | Implementation Phase | Planning Phase | In operation | Planning Phase |
| A1P006: Start Date | ||||||
| A1P006: Start date | 12/18 | 10/17 | 10/24 | 01/16 | 10/22 | |
| A1P007: End Date | ||||||
| A1P007: End date | 12/23 | 03/24 | 10/28 | 09/25 | ||
| A1P008: Reference Project | ||||||
| A1P008: Reference Project | ||||||
| A1P009: Data availability | ||||||
| A1P009: Data availability |
|
|
|
| ||
| A1P009: Other | ||||||
| A1P010: Sources | ||||||
| Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab |
| |||||
| A1P011: Geographic coordinates | ||||||
| X Coordinate (longitude): | 6.535121 | 11.134148 | 29.258300 | 15.394495 | 11.580204 | 32.795369 |
| Y Coordinate (latitude): | 53.234846 | 46.041160 | 41.030600 | 60.486609 | 60.891878 | 39.881812 |
| A1P012: Country | ||||||
| A1P012: Country | Netherlands | Italy | Turkey | Sweden | Norway | Turkey |
| A1P013: City | ||||||
| A1P013: City | Groningen | Trento | Istanbul | Borlänge | Elverum | Ankara |
| A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification) | ||||||
| A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification). | Cfa | Cfb | Cfa | Dsb | Dfb | Dsb |
| A1P015: District boundary | ||||||
| A1P015: District boundary | Functional | Geographic | Geographic | Geographic | ||
| Other | ||||||
| A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab | ||||||
| A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab: | Mixed | Mixed | Private | Mixed | Public | Private |
| A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure | ||||||
| A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure: | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | Single Owner | Single Owner | Single Owner | Multiple Owners |
| A1P018: Number of buildings in PED | ||||||
| A1P018: Number of buildings in PED | 7 | 15 | 10 | 257 | ||
| A1P019: Conditioned space | ||||||
| A1P019: Conditioned space [m²] | 1.01 | 3700 | 22600 | |||
| A1P020: Total ground area | ||||||
| A1P020: Total ground area [m²] | 17.132 | 285.400 | 9945 | 430000 | 50800 | |
| A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area | ||||||
| A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| A1P022: Financial schemes | ||||||
| A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estate | yes | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO scheme | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Other | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural funding | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National funding | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional funding | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal funding | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EU | yes | no | yes | no | no | yes |
| A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - National | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regional | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Other | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022: Other | Green financing | |||||
| A1P023: Economic Targets | ||||||
| A1P023: Economic Targets |
|
|
|
| ||
| A1P023: Other | ||||||
| A1P024: More comments: | ||||||
| A1P024: More comments: | In addition to having the most energy efficient academic building in Turkey, the university campus also has 3 buildings with LEED NC Campus certificate and LEED BD+C Gold certificate. In addition, it aims to continuously improve the energy efficiency objectives on campus in an innovative way. For this purpose, energy management and storage systems are being installed in the Dormitory 6 building, which is used as the demo area of the LEGOFIT project, for the purpose of turning it into a PED project. | The urban morphology of Çamlık District differs in several ways, compared with the typical urban fabric in Türkiye, along with the capital city of Ankara. The houses on the site are composed of three-story attached single-housing units with multiple rows, creating a total of 257 housing units in total. Low-rise buildings coupled with suitably oriented rooftop surfaces brings about significant advantages in the site. Dense greenery in the site also results in reduced cooling energy demand in the buildings. | ||||
| A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs | ||||||
| A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR] | 1 | |||||
| Contact person for general enquiries | ||||||
| A1P026: Name | Jasper Tonen, Elisabeth Koops | Christoph Gollner | Cem Keskin | Jingchun Shen | Christoph Gollner | Prof. Dr. İpek Gürsel DİNO |
| A1P027: Organization | Municipality of Groningen | FFG | Center for Energy, Environment and Economy, Ozyegin University | Högskolan Dalarna | FFG | Middle East Technical University |
| A1P028: Affiliation | Municipality / Public Bodies | Other | Research Center / University | Research Center / University | Other | Research Center / University |
| A1P028: Other | ||||||
| A1P029: Email | Jasper.tonen@groningen.nl | christoph.gollner@ffg.at | cem.keskin@ozyegin.edu.tr | jih@du.se | christoph.gollner@ffg.at | ipekg@metu.edu.tr |
| Contact person for other special topics | ||||||
| A1P030: Name | M. Pınar Mengüç | Xingxing Zhang | Assoc. Prof. Onur Taylan | |||
| A1P031: Email | pinar.menguc@ozyegin.edu.tr | xza@du.se | otaylan@metu.edu.tr | |||
| Pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| A2P001: Fields of application | ||||||
| A2P001: Fields of application |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A2P001: Other | ||||||
| A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields | ||||||
| A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields | Energy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streams | LEED NC Campus + LEGOFIT Project Energy Efficiency: Tri- generation, Compliance with ISO 50001, ASHRAE 90.1, energy efficient appliances, HVAC and lighting Energy flexibility: Energy demand management Energy production: Solar PVs Onsite + (to be installed more) E-mobility: EV Charging stations Indoor Air Quality: Energy Management System, Compliance with ASHRAE 62.1, ASHRAE 55 Construction materials: Passive systems, LEED certified buildings, innovative materials such as PCM Waste Management: Zero waste document | Load calculation and system optimisation: City Energy Analyst Identification of stranded assets for asset owners and investors to understand the carbon risks: CRREM | The energy consumption and efficiency of the energy model of Çamlık Site, created using EnergyPlus software, have been evaluated under the scenarios specified below. At each stage, a new system was incorporated to explore the potential of the area becoming a PED. In this context, four scenarios were created to compare different energy scenarios for the Ankara pilot area and to observe the impact of the included systems on energy efficiency: V_base; V_ER; V_ER,HP; V_ER,HP,PV. The basic scenario (V_base) was created using the current state without any improvement to the building envelope. This scenario was developed to determine the annual energy needs of the entire site without any intervention and serves as a reference point for the other developed models. The second scenario (V_ER) was created to improve the building envelopes of all residential units in the area, altering the U-values according to Türkiye's current building standards (TS-825). The third scenario (V_ER,HP) primarily includes a heat pump model that can use electrical energy to produce higher thermal energy and is added on top of the improvements in the second scenario. Finally, the V_ER,HP,PV scenario combines building envelope improvements, the heat pump, and the solar PV system. | ||
| A2P003: Application of ISO52000 | ||||||
| A2P003: Application of ISO52000 | No | Yes | No | Yes | ||
| A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance | ||||||
| A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance | ||||||
| A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance | No | No | No | No | ||
| A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation | ||||||
| A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation | Mobility, till now, is not included in the energy model. | Not included, the campus is a non car area except emergencies | Mobility is not included in the calculations. | |||
| A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand | ||||||
| A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum] | 2.3 | 0.6777 | 3.446 | |||
| A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand | ||||||
| A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum] | 0.33 | 0.03656 | 0.528 | |||
| A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility | ||||||
| A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum] | 0 | |||||
| A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure | ||||||
| A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum] | 0 | |||||
| A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year | ||||||
| A2P011: PV | no | no | yes | no | no | yes |
| A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 3.4240 | |||||
| A2P011: Wind | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P011: Hydro | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P011: Biomass_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P011: Biomass_peat_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P011: PVT_el | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.01818 | |||||
| A2P011: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year | ||||||
| A2P012: Geothermal | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Solar Thermal | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Biomass_heat | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.1 | |||||
| A2P012: Waste heat+HP | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Biomass_peat_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: PVT_th | yes | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.0825 | |||||
| A2P012: Biomass_firewood_th | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes | ||||||
| A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes | Geothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centers | |||||
| A2P014: Annual energy use | ||||||
| A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum] | 3.5 | 0.318 | 3.976 | |||
| A2P015: Annual energy delivered | ||||||
| A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum] | 0.2055 | |||||
| A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year | ||||||
| A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | 0 | |||||
| A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year | ||||||
| A2P017: Gas | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P017: Coal | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P017: Oil | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P017: Other | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | 0 | |||||
| A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year | ||||||
| A2P018: PV | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | 0.00045547 | |||||
| A2P018: Wind | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: Hydro | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: Biomass_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: Biomass_peat_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: PVT_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: Other | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | 0.187 | |||||
| A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year | ||||||
| A2P019: Geothermal | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Solar Thermal | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Biomass_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Waste heat+HP | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Biomass_peat_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: PVT_th | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Biomass_firewood_th | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Other | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0 | |||||
| A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary | ||||||
| A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.53839572192513 | 0 | 0 |
| A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED | ||||||
| A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum] | 6.93 | |||||
| A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||
| A2P022: Safety & Security | none | |||||
| A2P022: Health | thermal comfort diagram | |||||
| A2P022: Education | none | |||||
| A2P022: Mobility | none | Mode of transport; Access to public transport | ||||
| A2P022: Energy | normalized CO2/GHG & Energy intensity | Energy efficiency in buildings; Net energy need; Gross energy need; Total energy need | ||||
| A2P022: Water | ||||||
| A2P022: Economic development | cost of excess emissions | |||||
| A2P022: Housing and Community | Delivery and proximity to amenities | |||||
| A2P022: Waste | ||||||
| A2P022: Other | GHG emissions; Power/load; Life cycle cost (LCC); Demographic needs and consultation plan; Public Space | |||||
| A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation | ||||||
| A2P023: Photovoltaics | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
| A2P023: Solar thermal collectors | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | no |
| A2P023: Wind Turbines | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Geothermal energy system | yes | yes | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P023: Waste heat recovery | yes | yes | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P023: Waste to energy | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Polygeneration | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Co-generation | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Heat Pump | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
| A2P023: Hydrogen | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Hydropower plant | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Biomass | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Biogas | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Other | ||||||
| A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility | ||||||
| A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | no |
| A2P024: Energy management system | yes | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P024: Demand-side management | yes | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P024: Smart electricity grid | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A2P024: Thermal Storage | yes | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P024: Electric Storage | yes | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P024: District Heating and Cooling | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | no |
| A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systems | yes | yes | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P024: P2P – buildings | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P024: Other | ||||||
| A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency | ||||||
| A2P025: Deep Retrofitting | no | no | no | yes | no | yes |
| A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildings | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P025: High-performance new buildings | yes | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting) | yes | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Urban data platforms | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Mobile applications for citizens | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting) | no | no | yes | yes | no | yes |
| A2P025: Smart irrigation | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposal | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Smart surveillance | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Other | ||||||
| A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility | ||||||
| A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private) | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances) | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P026: e-Mobility | yes | yes | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutions | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P026: Car-free area | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P026: Other | ||||||
| A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes | ||||||
| A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes | ||||||
| A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates | ||||||
| A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates | Yes | Yes | No | No | ||
| A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes | Energy Performance Certificate | |||||
| A2P029: Any other building / district certificates | ||||||
| A2P029: Any other building / district certificates | Yes | No | No | |||
| A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes | LEED BD+C, LEED NC CAMPUS | |||||
| A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy | ||||||
| A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy | ||||||
| A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy | The study aligns closely with the decarbonisation and energy reduction pathways of residential multi family buildings with 1.5°C global warming target in Sweden. This study will also contribute to the achievement of the carbon neturality of whole Borlänge city by 2030. | |||||
| A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid | ||||||
| A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid |
|
|
| |||
| A3P003: Other | Boiler Automation, Energy Management System, Electric Battery Storage, Demand Management and Flexible Pricing | |||||
| A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities | ||||||
| A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities | Carbon and Energy Neutrality | In our project, we carried out a comprehensive exploration of strategies to achieve positive energy districts in a Swedish residential portfolio. The focus on urban energy transitions necessitates a holistic approach that integrates building retrofit, solar technology exploration, and heating supply optimisation. Exploration of Local Solar Sources: The analysis reveals varying solar irradiance resources throughout the year, emphasizing the importance of strategic placement. Integration of combined photovoltaic and thermal panels into building envelopes demonstrates the potential to cover a significant portion of the energy demand even in Sweden. Heating Supply Optimisation with Solar Technologies: Despite the surplus energy production from on-site solar technology, challenges arise due to temporal energy asymmetry. The introduction of heat pumps emerges as a feasible solution to balance energy gaps, utilising both rejected and free heat. Optimisation scenarios, utilising a combination of geothermal heat pumps, water source heat pumps, and PVT, showcase remarkable reductions in emissions and primary energy consumption. Urban Form and Energy Infrastructure Design: We realised the importance of returning to urban form and energy infrastructure design to optimise future residential portfolio potential. Building layout design, influenced by zoning regulations and innovative typologies, plays a crucial role in achieving district level energy efficiency. Future challenges, including demographic shifts, e-mobility, and climate change, necessitate a more holistic approach to energy infrastructure design, addressing not only heating and electricity demands but also cooling requirements. | According to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary with heat pumps. Rooftop photovoltaic panels also have the potential for renewable energy generation. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity through this scenario. | |||
| A3P005: Sustainable behaviour | ||||||
| A3P005: Sustainable behaviour | In Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed. | Under LEGOFIT project, promoting sustainable behavior for better occupant experience is a targeted aim under a work package. | While our investigation primarily centres on technical optimisation within Positive Energy District (PED) development, it is essential to acknowledge the broader scope encompassing social and governance dimensions. Specifically, understanding stakeholders' willingness to embrace technical recommendations upon project completion is important. Several potential influencing factors merit exploration, including economic considerations, technical optimisation-associated embodied carbon balance, the general public's technical perceptions, and operational feasibility. Evaluating these aspects holistically not only enhances the efficacy of PED initiatives but also fosters greater acceptance and participation within the communities they serve. | |||
| A3P006: Economic strategies | ||||||
| A3P006: Economic strategies |
|
|
| |||
| A3P006: Other | ||||||
| A3P007: Social models | ||||||
| A3P007: Social models |
|
|
|
|
| |
| A3P007: Other | ||||||
| A3P008: Integrated urban strategies | ||||||
| A3P008: Integrated urban strategies |
|
|
|
| ||
| A3P008: Other | ||||||
| A3P009: Environmental strategies | ||||||
| A3P009: Environmental strategies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A3P009: Other | Energy Positive, Low Emission Zone | |||||
| A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects | ||||||
| A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects | At national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen: Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation. Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries. The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals. Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricity | ISO 45001, ISO 14001, ISO 50001, Zero Waste Policy | ||||
| B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition | ||||||
| B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition | The campus should be considered a PED case study due to its exemplary commitment to sustainability and energy efficiency, as evidenced by several of its buildings achieving LEED certification. This certification underscores the campus's adherence to rigorous environmental standards and its proactive steps towards reducing carbon footprints. Also, the integration of sustainable practices across the campus aligns with the PED framework, which aims to create urban areas that produce more energy than they consume. Therefore, this campus serves as a model of how educational institutions can lead the way in fostering sustainable communities and advancing the goals of PED. | The Rymdgatan's Residential Portfolio in Sweden presents a compelling case study for its classification as a PED-related research, given its alignment with sustainable behaviours and overarching PED development principles as follows: Inclusivity and Social Equity: The residential portfolio situated in Rymdgatan caters primarily to a low-income community. By focusing on this demographic, the project addresses critical aspects of social equity within sustainable urban development. Ensuring access to energy-efficient housing and amenities for economically disadvantaged populations not only fosters social cohesion but also mitigates energy poverty, a pressing concern in many urban contexts. Multifamily Residential Building: The inclusion of multifamily residential buildings within the portfolio underscores a commitment to density and efficient land use, both essential components of sustainable urban design. Such developments promote resource optimisation by consolidating housing units, thereby reducing per capita energy consumption and infrastructure demands. Moreover, multifamily dwellings often facilitate community engagement and shared resource management, fostering a culture of sustainability among residents. Low Carbon Retrofitting and Transition: The overarching initiative to transition the entire Jakobsgårdarna district. The included Rymdgatan portfolio, towards low carbon retrofitting, represents a significant example of decarbonization and climate resilience. By integrating energy-efficient technologies and renewable energy solutions into existing infrastructure, the project not only reduces carbon emissions but also serves as a blueprint for revitalising old urban environments sustainably. This holistic approach to retrofitting demonstrates a systemic commitment to environmental stewardship and long-term sustainability. Climate Adaptation and Renewable Energy Integration: Despite Sweden's climatic challenges, including lower solar resources during winter months, the Rymdgatan project leverages its geographical context to optimize renewable energy utilization. Sweden's greater solar resource availability during summer and geothermal potentials complement the design's emphasis on seasonal energy planning, where surplus energy generated during peak periods can be stored or redistributed efficiently. By embracing climate-responsive design strategies, the project demonstrates resilience in the face of climate variability while harnessing renewable energy potential effectively. | Çamlık District, unlike many other districts in Ankara, has a specific urban morphology that draws near the other pilot zones considered by the partners of PED-ACT. The site has three-storey single housing units, along with a fair amount of greenery around. Furthermore, the roof areas enable large amounts of PV installment, which results in higher amounts of local renewable energy potential. Therefore, the district is a good fit for PED development. | |||
| B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development | ||||||
| B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development | The purpose of implementing the PED project on this sustainable campus, where several buildings have LEED certification, is to further enhance its energy efficiency and environmental stewardship by creating a district that generates more energy than it consumes. The initiator was motivated by the need to address climate change, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and promote renewable energy sources. Additionally, the campus's existing commitment to sustainability and the success of its LEED-certified buildings provided a strong foundation for demonstrating the feasibility and benefits of PED development, serving as a model for sustainable urban living and energy self-sufficiency. | Borlänge city has committed to become the carbon-neutral city by 2030. | PED-ACT project. | |||
| B1P003: Environment of the case study area | ||||||
| B2P003: Environment of the case study area | Suburban area | Suburban area | Urban area | Suburban area | Suburban area | |
| B1P004: Type of district | ||||||
| B2P004: Type of district |
|
|
|
|
| |
| B1P005: Case Study Context | ||||||
| B1P005: Case Study Context |
|
|
|
|
| |
| B1P006: Year of construction | ||||||
| B1P006: Year of construction | 2024 | 1990 | 1986 | |||
| B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential | ||||||
| B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential | 100 | |||||
| B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential | ||||||
| B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential | 100 | |||||
| B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential | ||||||
| B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential | 9800 | 6 | ||||
| B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential | ||||||
| B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential | 9800 | 6 | ||||
| B1P011: Population density before intervention | ||||||
| B1P011: Population density before intervention | 0 | 0 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| B1P012: Population density after intervention | ||||||
| B1P012: Population density after intervention | 0 | 0 | 34.337771548704 | 0.010658622423328 | 0 | 0 |
| B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention | ||||||
| B1P013: Residential | no | yes | no | yes | no | yes |
| B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²] | 4360 | 50800 | ||||
| B1P013: Office | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Industry and Utility | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Commercial | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Institutional | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²] | 285.400 | |||||
| B1P013: Natural areas | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Recreational | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Dismissed areas | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Other | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²] | 706 | |||||
| B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention | ||||||
| B1P014: Residential | no | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
| B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²] | 4360 | 100000 | 50800 | |||
| B1P014: Office | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Industry and Utility | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Commercial | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Institutional | no | no | yes | no | yes | no |
| B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²] | 280000 | 2000 | ||||
| B1P014: Natural areas | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Recreational | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Dismissed areas | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Other | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²] | 706 | |||||
| B2P001: PED Lab concept definition | ||||||
| B2P001: PED Lab concept definition | Groningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city. | |||||
| B2P002: Installation life time | ||||||
| B2P002: Installation life time | The MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact. | |||||
| B2P003: Scale of action | ||||||
| B2P003: Scale | District | |||||
| B2P004: Operator of the installation | ||||||
| B2P004: Operator of the installation | The Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties. | |||||
| B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials | ||||||
| B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials | Groningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materials | |||||
| B2P006: Circular Economy Approach | ||||||
| B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials? | No | |||||
| B2P006: Other | ||||||
| B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab |
| |||||
| B2P007: Other | ||||||
| B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab | Municipality | |||||
| B2P008: Other | ||||||
| B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab |
| |||||
| B2P009: Other | research companies, monitoring company, ict company | |||||
| B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities | ||||||
| B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities | ||||||
| B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab |
| |||||
| B2P011: Other | ||||||
| B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab |
| |||||
| B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people | ||||||
| B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people | ||||||
| B2P014: Monitoring measures | ||||||
| B2P014: Monitoring measures |
| |||||
| B2P015: Key Performance indicators | ||||||
| B2P015: Key Performance indicators |
| |||||
| B2P016: Execution of operations | ||||||
| B2P016: Execution of operations | ||||||
| B2P017: Capacities | ||||||
| B2P017: Capacities | ||||||
| B2P018: Relations with stakeholders | ||||||
| B2P018: Relations with stakeholders | ||||||
| B2P019: Available tools | ||||||
| B2P019: Available tools |
| |||||
| B2P019: Available tools | ||||||
| B2P020: External accessibility | ||||||
| B2P020: External accessibility | ||||||
| C1P001: Unlocking Factors | ||||||
| C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up) | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down) | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.) | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES) | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any) | ||||||
| C1P002: Driving Factors | ||||||
| C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency) | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P002: Economic growth need | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.) | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any) | Earthquakes due to gas extraction | |||||
| C1P003: Administrative barriers | ||||||
| C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P003: Lack of public participation | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos) | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P004: Policy barriers | ||||||
| C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers | ||||||
| C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P005: Regulatory instability | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P005: Non-effective regulations | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P006: Environmental barriers | ||||||
| C1P006: Environmental barriers | Air Quality Management Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Energy Efficiency Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Water Conservation Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Waste Management Importance Level: 4 (Important) Material Selection Importance Level: 4 (Important) Renewable Energy Integration Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Heat Island Effect Mitigation Importance Level: 4 (Important) Noise Pollution Control Importance Level: 3 (Moderately Important) | 2 - Slightly important | - Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Water Scarcity: 1 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 | |||
| C1P007: Technical barriers | ||||||
| C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Deficient planning | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P007: Lack of well-defined process | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers | ||||||
| C1P008: Inertia | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P008: Rebound effect | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers | ||||||
| C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P010: Financial barriers | ||||||
| C1P010: Hidden costs | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P010: Economic crisis | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P010: Risk and uncertainty | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P011: Market barriers | ||||||
| C1P011: Split incentives | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P011: Energy price distortion | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs) | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P012: Stakeholders involved | ||||||
| C1P012: Government/Public Authorities |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: Research & Innovation |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: Financial/Funding |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: Business process management |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: Urban Services providers |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: Real Estate developers |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: Design/Construction companies |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: Other |
| |||||
| C1P012: Other (if any) | ||||||
| Summary |
Authors (framework concept)
Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)
Contributors (to the content)
Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)
Implemented by
Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)
