Name | Project | Type | Compare |
---|---|---|---|
Findhorn, the Park | InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED | ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
Schönbühel an der Donau, Schönbühel-Aggsbach | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Umeå, Ålidhem district | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study | Compare |
Aalborg East | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
Ankara, Çamlık District | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
Trenčín | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Luxembourg, Betzdorf | LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Vantaa, Aviapolis | NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
Vidin, Himik and Bononia | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Oslo, Verksbyen | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
Uden, Loopkantstraat | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Zaragoza, Actur | NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Aarhus, Brabrand | BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city | ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins | PED Case Study | Uncompare |
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study | Compare |
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus | LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Espoo, Kera | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
Freiburg, Waldsee | PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district | PED Case Study | Compare |
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Graz, Reininghausgründe | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Oulu, Kaukovainio | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Uncompare |
Halmstad, Fyllinge | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Lund, Brunnshög district | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Évora, Portugal | POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Uncompare |
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Groningen, PED South | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Lab | Compare |
Groningen, PED North | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Lab | Compare |
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Lab | Compare |
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT | PED Lab | Uncompare | |
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district | STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Uncompare |
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
Salzburg, Gneis district | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Uncompare |
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
Tartu, City centre area | SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | |
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district | GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions | PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab | PED Lab | Compare | |
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Uncompare |
Kifissia, Energy community | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Title | Tartu, City centre area | Leon, Former Sugar Factory district | Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district | Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district | Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio | Évora, Portugal | Salzburg, Gneis district | Oulu, Kaukovainio | Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT | Ankara, Çamlık District | Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab | |||||||||||
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab | Tartu, City centre area | Leon, Former Sugar Factory district | Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district | Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district | Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio | Évora, Portugal | Salzburg, Gneis district | Oulu, Kaukovainio | Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT | Ankara, Çamlık District | Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city |
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet | |||||||||||
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet |
|
|
| ||||||||
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site | |||||||||||
PED case study | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | yes | yes | no | yes | yes |
PED relevant case study | yes | no | no | yes | yes | yes | no | no | no | yes | no |
PED Lab. | yes | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | no | no |
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab | |||||||||||
Climate neutrality | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | no | yes | yes |
Annual energy surplus | no | yes | no | no | yes | yes | yes | no | no | yes | no |
Energy community | no | no | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | no | yes | yes |
Circularity | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
Air quality and urban comfort | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | yes | no | no |
Electrification | yes | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | yes | no | yes | no |
Net-zero energy cost | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
Net-zero emission | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | yes | no |
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous) | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | yes |
Maximise self-sufficiency | yes | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes | yes |
Other | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
Other (A1P004) | Net-zero emission; Annual energy surplus | ||||||||||
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab | |||||||||||
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED Lab | Implementation Phase | Planning Phase | Implementation Phase | Planning Phase | Planning Phase | Implementation Phase | Completed | In operation | Implementation Phase | Planning Phase | Planning Phase |
A1P006: Start Date | |||||||||||
A1P006: Start date | 02/16 | 12/18 | 09/19 | 10/19 | 01/20 | 11/19 | 10/22 | 01/24 | |||
A1P007: End Date | |||||||||||
A1P007: End date | 07/22 | 12/23 | 10/23 | 09/24 | 01/24 | 12/23 | 09/25 | 12/26 | |||
A1P008: Reference Project | |||||||||||
A1P008: Reference Project | |||||||||||
A1P009: Data availability | |||||||||||
A1P009: Data availability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
A1P009: Other | |||||||||||
A1P010: Sources | |||||||||||
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab |
|
|
| ||||||||
A1P011: Geographic coordinates | |||||||||||
X Coordinate (longitude): | 26.722737 | -5.584795 | 12.318458 | 11.397323 | 15.394495 | -7.909377 | 13.041216 | 25.517595084093507 | -2.508 | 32.795369 | 24.08168339 |
Y Coordinate (latitude): | 58.380713 | 42.593391 | 51.326492 | 44.507106 | 60.486609 | 38.570804 | 47.771019 | 64.99288098173132 | 41.603 | 39.881812 | 56.95245956 |
A1P012: Country | |||||||||||
A1P012: Country | Estonia | Spain | Germany | Italy | Sweden | Portugal | Austria | Finland | Spain | Turkey | Latvia |
A1P013: City | |||||||||||
A1P013: City | Tartu | Leon | Leipzig | Bologna | Borlänge | Évora | Salzburg | Oulu | Lubia - Soria | Ankara | Riga |
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification) | |||||||||||
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification). | Dfb | Csb | Dfb | Cfa | Dsb | Csa | Dfb | Dfc | Cfb | Dsb | Cfb |
A1P015: District boundary | |||||||||||
A1P015: District boundary | Functional | Geographic | Functional | Geographic | Geographic | Geographic | Geographic | Geographic | Geographic | Geographic | |
Other | Geographic | Regional (close to virtual) | |||||||||
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab | |||||||||||
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab: | Private | Mixed | Mixed | Mixed | Mixed | Mixed | Mixed | Public | Private | Public | |
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure | |||||||||||
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure: | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | Single Owner | Multiple Owners | Single Owner | Single Owner | Single Owner | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | |
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED | |||||||||||
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED | 18 | 21 | 2 | 1962 | 10 | 17 | 6 | 6 | 257 | 15 | |
A1P019: Conditioned space | |||||||||||
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²] | 35217 | 16.06900 | 17000 | 3700 | 199762 | 19700 | 22600 | 170000 | |||
A1P020: Total ground area | |||||||||||
A1P020: Total ground area [m²] | 793144 | 73.14569 | 30000 | 7800000 | 9945 | 60000 | 6400000 | 50800 | 119264 | ||
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area | |||||||||||
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
A1P022: Financial schemes | |||||||||||
A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estate | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | 6500000 | ||||||||||
A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO scheme | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||||||||
A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Other | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||||||||
A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural funding | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | 4000000 | ||||||||||
A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National funding | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | 8000000 | ||||||||||
A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional funding | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||||||||
A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal funding | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||||||||
A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Other | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||||||||
A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EU | no | no | no | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | yes |
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | 19998275 | 7500000 | |||||||||
A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - National | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | yes | no |
A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||||||||
A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regional | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||||||||
A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Other | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||||||||
A1P022: Other | |||||||||||
A1P023: Economic Targets | |||||||||||
A1P023: Economic Targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
A1P023: Other | Sustainable and replicable business models regarding renewable energy systems | Boosting social cooperation and social aid | Developing and demonstrating new solutions | ||||||||
A1P024: More comments: | |||||||||||
A1P024: More comments: | The Pilastro-Roveri area is a large peri-urban district in the northeast of the city of Bologna (about 650 hectares). In particular, the northern area is mainly characterised by the residential sector of Rione Pilastro, a significant complex of social housing built in the 1960s in response to the housing emergency due to migrations from southern Italy and nowadays satisfying more global migrations. The southern area is instead characterised by the presence of the production district called Roveri. The area appears relevant for the research as it has several evolution potentials towards a climate-neutral district. In particular some key factors are interesting: - the presence of one of the largest photovoltaic parks in Europe on the roofs of CAAB, characterised by a production of 11,350,000 Kw/h of primary energy; - the presence of companies attentive to the issues of climate change and energy, able to act as facilitators for the area. This is the case of FIVE, a leader in the production of electric bicycles, whose plant is the first nZEB (nearly Zero Energy Building) productive building in the city; - the high presence of industrial buildings of different sizes needing a reduction in energy consumption; - the presence of obsolete, sometimes in decay, and of general highly energy-intensive buildings in the Pilastro area, accompanied by spread phenomena of energy poverty; - the presence of spaces that could be converted (e.g. unused warehouses, unexploited green areas, etc.); - the presence of an active community, characterised by numerous associations, but also by social challenges linked to multiple vulnerabilities; - the presence of local actors interested in the development of the area (including the Municipality, the University, Confindustria, ENEA, Confartigianato, etc.). Two main research projects are actually ongoing in the area, applying solutions towards energy improvement and transition strategies to guide the area towards climate neutrality: - GECO - Green Energy Community, funded by EIT Climate-KIC and active since 2019, aims to trigger a virtuous path of energy sharing between companies and citizens through the creation of an energy community. - GRETA - Green Energy Transition Actions, funded by the H2020 programme, aims to understand drivers and barriers on the involvement of citizens in the energy transition processes, by formulating Community Transition Pathways and Energy Citizenship Contracts. [from: Boeri, A., Boulanger, S., Turci, G., Pagliula, S. (2021) Strategie e tecnologie abilitanti per PED misti: efficienza tra smart cities e industria 4.0. TECHNE, 22, 180-190] | The Centre for the Development of Renewable Energy (CEDER)is specialized in applied research, development and promotion of renewable energy. Among the facilities of this Centre, the urban laboratory CEDER-CIEMAT assess the performance of different configurations of energy networks at the district level. This PED-Lab infrastructure is an energy district that connects six office buildings with energy generation installations by means of two energy rings: electrical grid (in operation phase) and thermal network (in the implementation phase). The buildings of this PED Lab can act as energy demanders or suppliers depending on the climatic and operational conditions. The majority of these buildings are constructed with conventional technologies but some of them are implemented with efficient and sustainable measures. The thermal network is composed by two biomass boilers, 300 kW power each, and water tanks with 90 kWh of thermal storage. This network will shortly be expanded with a low temperature (90°C) and high temperature (150°-250°C) rings. The low-temperature ring is made up by two Stirling engine cogeneration boilers (one biomass gasification boiler and one gas boiler). The high-temperature ring has a thermal generator made up of Fresnel solar concentrators and an ORC cogeneration system fed directly from the solar concentrator. The high-temperature ring is interconnected with the low-temperature ring through an oil/water heat exchanger. This network has thermal storage systems in the modalities of: aquifers, boreholes, phase change materials, cold storage with geothermal exchange ground recovery and thermal storage at very low temperature with zeolites. The electrical grid incorporates different renewable generation technologies (50 kW wind turbine and eight different photovoltaic systems, a reversible hydraulic system), and engine generator of 100 kVA, electricity storages (batteries) and flexible loads. | The urban morphology of Çamlık District differs in several ways, compared with the typical urban fabric in Türkiye, along with the capital city of Ankara. The houses on the site are composed of three-story attached single-housing units with multiple rows, creating a total of 257 housing units in total. Low-rise buildings coupled with suitably oriented rooftop surfaces brings about significant advantages in the site. Dense greenery in the site also results in reduced cooling energy demand in the buildings. | ||||||||
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs | |||||||||||
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR] | 25 | 5 | |||||||||
Contact person for general enquiries | |||||||||||
A1P026: Name | Jaanus Tamm | Begoña Gonzalo Orden | Simon Baum | Prof. Danila Longo | Jingchun Shen | João Bravo Dias | Abel Magyari | Samuli Rinne | Dr. Raquel Ramos | Prof. Dr. İpek Gürsel DİNO | Judith Stiekema |
A1P027: Organization | Tartu City Government | Municipality of Leon | CENERO Energy GmbH | University of Bologna - Architecture Department | Högskolan Dalarna | EDP Labelec | ABUD | City of Oulu | Centre for the Development of Renewable Energy (CEDER) - Centre for Energy, Environment and Technology Research (CIEMAT) | Middle East Technical University | OASC |
A1P028: Affiliation | Municipality / Public Bodies | Other | Other | Research Center / University | Research Center / University | SME / Industry | Research Center / University | Municipality / Public Bodies | Research Center / University | Research Center / University | Other |
A1P028: Other | Municipality of Leon - ILRUV | CENERO Energy GmbH | not for profit private organisation | ||||||||
A1P029: Email | Jaanus.tamm@tartu.ee | begona.gonzalo@aytoleon.es | sib@cenero.de | jih@du.se | joao.bravodias@edp.pt | magyari.abel@abud.hu | samuli.rinne@ouka.fi | raquel.ramos@ciemat.es | ipekg@metu.edu.tr | judith@oascities.org | |
Contact person for other special topics | |||||||||||
A1P030: Name | Kaspar Alev | Monica Prada Corral | Simon Baum | Xingxing Zhang | Strassl Ingeborg | Samuli Rinne | Dr. Oscar Seco | Assoc. Prof. Onur Taylan | |||
A1P031: Email | Kaspar.alev@tartu.ee | Monica.Prada@ilruv.es | sib@cenero.de | xza@du.se | inge.strassl@salzburg.gv.at | samuli.rinne@ouka.fi | oscar.seco@ciemat.es | otaylan@metu.edu.tr | |||
Pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
A2P001: Fields of application | |||||||||||
A2P001: Fields of application |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A2P001: Other | |||||||||||
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields | |||||||||||
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields | Energy efficiency: - buildings retrofitting - combined public and private financing - low temperature central heating - LED lighting Energy production: - installation of photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Digital technologies: - smart-meters smart home system. Smart city information platform E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; - e-bike/bikesharing services implementation. Urban comfort and air quality - Control units for air pollutants concentration (PM2.5, PM10, NO2) - Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan - SECAP) | Energy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit Energy production: - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Energy flexibility: - testing share energy solutions (public-private stakeholders) Digital technologies - smart city platform - smart energy management E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; - e-bike/bikesharing services implementation. | Energy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax incentives (110%, façade bonus, eco-bonus, sismabonus, renovation bonus, etc.); - several activities - such as Workshops, Webinars, Roundtables, Urban Trekking, etc…- are encouraged in the area to deepen knowledge and raise awareness on energy issues among urban stakeholders (householders, occupants, workers, etc..); - reduction in energy consumption also through every day energy saving actions. The spread of energy poverty phenomena in the area is considered urgent both for the medium-low-income population living in Pilastro and for small and medium-sized enterprises placed in Roveri; - Project for a One-stop-shop to guide residents and enterprises towards more conscious energy behaviours (planned in Bologna SECAP). Energy production: - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a waste to energy plant connected to the district heating system; - presence of a large PV plant in the CAAB area - 11,350,000 Kw/h Energy flexibility: - testing energy community and collective self-consumption feasibility in Pilastro area through an active citizens involvement process; - testing energy community feasibility among SMEs in Roveri industrial area; - testing the potential of complementary energy consumption profiles between residential area (Pilastro) and industrial area (Roveri). Digital technologies: - smart-meters installation in some dwellings in order to monitor consumption and suggest more sustainable energy behaviors; - Blog Pilastro as a tool to inform about the main activities and events ongoing in the area; E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; - e-bike/bikesharing services recovery (in fact during Covid-19 in the area Mobike service was suspended) and implementation. Urban comfort and air quality - Control units for air pollutants concentration (PM2.5, PM10, NO2); - Microclimatic simulation | Load calculation and system optimisation: City Energy Analyst Identification of stranded assets for asset owners and investors to understand the carbon risks: CRREM | - Dynamic district, and building scale energy modelling - Microclimate modelling - Klimaaktiv certification system - Energy community - Flexibility with shared heating and electricity systems | Different kinds of waste heat streams are utilized by heat pumps. These are district heating return water (actually this is an indirect way to cool down the flue gas in the scrubber), ventilation exhaust air and sewage water. As a normal case, in ventilation also air-to-air heat exchanges are used. PV power is harvested also, in vertical and more horizontal panels. Buildings are well insulated to decrease the needed amount of heating energy in the first place. | Energy efficiency: - Buildings energy retrofit. Energy production: - Biomass Boiler capacity: 0.6 MW. Annual production: 1.2 GWh - Solar thermal collectors: 70 kW, planned extended to: 0.47MW - Geotermal & Absorption Pumps: 100 kW - Share of renewables after extension: 100% (30% solar thermal and 70% biomass) - AOC 50kW wind turbine. Awaiting installation of a two-way AC-AC converter for subsequent connection to the grid - Bornay Inclin 3 kW wind turbine, connected to 24 Vdc batteries, to be connected to the grid by means of Xantrex inverter/charger - 9kW photovoltaic park (66PV panels, brand BP Solar,type BP5140,of 140W) connected to the grid by means of two INGECON SUN 5 inverters - 5kW photovoltaic pergola (24PV panels, brand Solon, type P200, of 210W) connected to the grid by means of one INGECON SUN 5 inverter - 8.28kW photovoltaic roof (36PV panels, Brand LDK, type LDK-230P-20), connected to the grid by means of one INGECONSUN 10 inverter - 12kW photovoltaic roof (80PV panels, brand Gamesa, type GS-1501), connected to the grid. - Reversible hydraulic system connected to a 60 kW electric generator and a pumping system. -Stirling engine with a heat lamp based on natural gas, a helium cool lamp, 10kWe maximum power delivered and global performance of approximately 33%. Energy flexibility: - Thermal storage systems: water tanks 90kW, aquifers, boreholes, phase change materials, cold storage with geothermal exchange ground recovery and thermal storage at very low temperature with zeolites. - Electrical storage systems: batteries (lead-acid and lithium-ion). - Flexible loads. Control systems and Digital technologies: - Full monitoring campaign. - Smart-meters installation to monitor consumption and suggest another energy behaviours. - Dynamic simulation tools to optimize the energy performance. Urban comfort and air quality: - Meteorological stations to monitor the climate evolution. - Microclimatic simulation tools to quantify the thermal behaviour. | The energy consumption and efficiency of the energy model of Çamlık Site, created using EnergyPlus software, have been evaluated under the scenarios specified below. At each stage, a new system was incorporated to explore the potential of the area becoming a PED. In this context, four scenarios were created to compare different energy scenarios for the Ankara pilot area and to observe the impact of the included systems on energy efficiency: V_base; V_ER; V_ER,HP; V_ER,HP,PV. The basic scenario (V_base) was created using the current state without any improvement to the building envelope. This scenario was developed to determine the annual energy needs of the entire site without any intervention and serves as a reference point for the other developed models. The second scenario (V_ER) was created to improve the building envelopes of all residential units in the area, altering the U-values according to Türkiye's current building standards (TS-825). The third scenario (V_ER,HP) primarily includes a heat pump model that can use electrical energy to produce higher thermal energy and is added on top of the improvements in the second scenario. Finally, the V_ER,HP,PV scenario combines building envelope improvements, the heat pump, and the solar PV system. | A suite of replicable modeling tools will enable stakeholders to analyze planning actions towards positive energy in a cost-effective fashion, aiding their evidence based decision-making process. The tools will be able to model the district’s energy production and demand, optimize for flexibility and simulate mobility and transport. By employing gamification and co-creation approaches, the project will enhance public awareness and engagement in energy efficiency. The project will culminate in the publication of practical guidelines, reusable models, algorithms, and training materials to aid other cities to replicate the digital twin for their districts, fostering widespread adoption of sustainable energy practices. | ||
A2P003: Application of ISO52000 | |||||||||||
A2P003: Application of ISO52000 | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | |
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance | |||||||||||
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance | |||||||||||
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes | |
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation | |||||||||||
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation | Not included. However, there is a charging place for a shared EV in one building. | Mobility is not included in the calculations. | The university operates a fleet of 13 electric vehicles (EV) (61kW power each). There are 5 EV charging stations on campus. | ||||||||
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand | |||||||||||
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum] | 9.1 | 3.49 | 1.65 | 0.6777 | 2.1 | 3.446 | 8000 | ||||
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand | |||||||||||
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum] | 0.57 | 0.03656 | 0.2 | 0.528 | 5000 | ||||||
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility | |||||||||||
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum] | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure | |||||||||||
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum] | 0 | ||||||||||
A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year | |||||||||||
A2P011: PV | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no |
A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 1.24 | 0.7770664 | 0.1 | 3.4240 | |||||||
A2P011: Wind | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | yes |
A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||||
A2P011: Hydro | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 1.28 | ||||||||||
A2P011: Biomass_el | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||||
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||||
A2P011: PVT_el | no | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.28 | 0.01818 | |||||||||
A2P011: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||||
A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year | |||||||||||
A2P012: Geothermal | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | yes | no | no |
A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||||
A2P012: Solar Thermal | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.5 | ||||||||||
A2P012: Biomass_heat | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes | no | yes |
A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||||
A2P012: Waste heat+HP | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | yes | no | no |
A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 2.2 | ||||||||||
A2P012: Biomass_peat_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||||
A2P012: PVT_th | no | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.0825 | ||||||||||
A2P012: Biomass_firewood_th | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||||
A2P012: Other | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||||
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes | |||||||||||
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes | Heat is produced from DH return, refrigeration and exhaust air. The mentioned 2200 MWh/a includes HP el. consumption (about 1/6 of that) | Conventional power generation: The university’s heat supply is designed as a local centralized heat supply system. Electrical power, generated in combined heat and power (CHP) units, is delivered to the distribution network and sold to energy traders as regulated by local legislation and norms. There are two natural gas burners acting as heat sources (3MW and 6MW capacity), and two CHP units (1.6MW and 0.45MW thermal capacity). All heating is supplied from the CHP plants. Renewable Energy Sources (RES): a wind turbine (3.6 kW) and PV panels (11.7 kW) are connected to the faculty microgrid. In the future it is planned to power the campus entirely from local RES. | |||||||||
A2P014: Annual energy use | |||||||||||
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum] | 2.421 | 0.318 | 0.819016 | 2.3 | 3.976 | ||||||
A2P015: Annual energy delivered | |||||||||||
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum] | 0.2055 | ||||||||||
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year | |||||||||||
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | |||||||
A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year | |||||||||||
A2P017: Gas | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | yes |
A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | |||||||||||
A2P017: Coal | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | |||||||||||
A2P017: Oil | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | |||||||||||
A2P017: Other | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | 0 | ||||||||||
A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year | |||||||||||
A2P018: PV | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | |||||||||||
A2P018: Wind | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | |||||||||||
A2P018: Hydro | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | |||||||||||
A2P018: Biomass_el | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | |||||||||||
A2P018: Biomass_peat_el | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | |||||||||||
A2P018: PVT_el | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | |||||||||||
A2P018: Other | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | 0.187 | ||||||||||
A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year | |||||||||||
A2P019: Geothermal | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||||
A2P019: Solar Thermal | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||||
A2P019: Biomass_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.7 | ||||||||||
A2P019: Waste heat+HP | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||||
A2P019: Biomass_peat_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||||
A2P019: PVT_th | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||||
A2P019: Biomass_firewood_th | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||||
A2P019: Other | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0 | ||||||||||
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary | |||||||||||
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.53839572192513 | 0 | 0 | 3.2857142857143 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED | |||||||||||
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum] | 980 | 6.93 | 0 | ||||||||
A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab | |||||||||||
A2P022: Safety & Security | none | ||||||||||
A2P022: Health | thermal comfort diagram | CO2) levels, Predicted Mean Vote,Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied, Temperature, Relative Humidity, Illuminance, Daylight factor, Sound pressure levels | Encouraging a healthy lifestyle | ||||||||
A2P022: Education | none | ||||||||||
A2P022: Mobility | none | Modal Split, Fuel mix in mobility, Energy use for transportation, Access to public transport, Public infrastructure promoting low-carbon mobility, Number of public EV charging stations, Energy delivered for EV charging | |||||||||
A2P022: Energy | apply | normalized CO2/GHG & Energy intensity | Non-renewable primary energy balance, Renewable energy ratio, Grid Purchase factor, Load cover factor/Self-generation, Supply cover factor/Self-consumption, Net energy/Net power, Peak delivered/exported power, Connection capacity credit, Total greenhouse gas emissions | Final energy consumption, Primary energy consumption, Energy imported to PED, Energy exported from PED, RES production, PED energy balance, Energy savings in the PED, GHG emissions, Reduction of emissions, Final energy consumption per capita, Primary energy consumption per capita, Primary energy sources (shares), Buildings connected to DH-network or renewable energy grid, GHG emissions per capita, System flexibility for energy players, RES storage usage, Peak load reduction | |||||||
A2P022: Water | |||||||||||
A2P022: Economic development | cost of excess emissions | Investment costs, Share of investments covered by grants, Maintenance-related costs, Requirement-related costs, Operation-related costs, Other costs, Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return, Economic Value Added, Payback Period, nZEB Cost Comparison | Total investments, Payback time, Economic value of savings | ||||||||
A2P022: Housing and Community | Access to services, Affordability of energy, Affordability of housing, Democratic legitimacy, Living conditions, Social cohesion, Personal safety, Energy consciousness | Development of housing prices, Housing cost overburden rate, Citizen engagement/empowerment to climate conscious actions, Inhabitants in dense areas, Energy poverty | |||||||||
A2P022: Waste | Recycling rate | ||||||||||
A2P022: Other | Smart Cities strategies, Quality of open data | ||||||||||
A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation | |||||||||||
A2P023: Photovoltaics | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | no |
A2P023: Solar thermal collectors | no | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | no | no | yes | no | no |
A2P023: Wind Turbines | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
A2P023: Geothermal energy system | no | no | no | yes | yes | no | yes | no | yes | no | no |
A2P023: Waste heat recovery | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | yes | no | no |
A2P023: Waste to energy | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P023: Polygeneration | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
A2P023: Co-generation | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | yes | no | no |
A2P023: Heat Pump | no | yes | no | yes | yes | no | no | yes | yes | yes | no |
A2P023: Hydrogen | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
A2P023: Hydropower plant | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
A2P023: Biomass | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | yes | no | no |
A2P023: Biogas | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P023: Other | |||||||||||
A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility | |||||||||||
A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | no | yes |
A2P024: Energy management system | yes | yes | no | no | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
A2P024: Demand-side management | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes | no | yes | no | yes |
A2P024: Smart electricity grid | no | no | no | no | no | yes | yes | no | yes | no | yes |
A2P024: Thermal Storage | no | no | no | no | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | no | yes |
A2P024: Electric Storage | no | no | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | yes | no | yes |
A2P024: District Heating and Cooling | yes | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | yes | yes | no | yes |
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systems | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | no | yes |
A2P024: P2P – buildings | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | no |
A2P024: Other | |||||||||||
A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency | |||||||||||
A2P025: Deep Retrofitting | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | no | no | yes | yes | yes | no |
A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildings | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P025: High-performance new buildings | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | no |
A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting) | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P025: Urban data platforms | yes | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | yes |
A2P025: Mobile applications for citizens | yes | no | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting) | no | no | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
A2P025: Smart irrigation | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposal | no | no | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P025: Smart surveillance | yes | no | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P025: Other | |||||||||||
A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility | |||||||||||
A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private) | yes | yes | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances) | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | no |
A2P026: e-Mobility | yes | yes | no | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | no | no | no |
A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutions | no | yes | no | yes | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | no |
A2P026: Car-free area | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
A2P026: Other | |||||||||||
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes | |||||||||||
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes | Test-Concept for bidirectional charging. | Shared mobility: a mobility point will be implemented and ensure the flexible use of different mobility services. | |||||||||
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates | |||||||||||
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | |
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes | Energy Performance Certificate - in Spain it is mandatory in order to buy or rent a house or a dwelling) | Energy Performance Certificate for each dwelling | Energy Performance Certificate | The obligatory buildijng energy classification | In Spain it is mandatory the Energy Performance Certificate in order to buy or rent a house or a dwelling | ||||||
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates | |||||||||||
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | ||
A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes | Klimaaktiv certificate, Greenpass certificate | ||||||||||
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy | |||||||||||
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy | |||||||||||
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy | City level targets Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (PUMS) - 2019 | Targets: - by 2030 440,000 daily trips will no longer be made by car but on foot, by bike or by public transport; - by 2030 12% of vehicles will be electric; Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP) - 2021 | Targets: - by 2025 deep renovation of 3% per year of residential homes (insulation of building envelopes and adoption of heat pump heating system); - by 2030 reduction of electricity consumption at least of 20% compared to 2018; - by 2030 100% coverage of electricity consumption for municipal buildings; - by 2030 increase public green areas by at least 10% Urban General Plan (PUG) - 2021 | Targets: - by 2030 net zero land consumption; National level targets Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan - 2020 | Targets: - by 2030 reduction of 43% for primary energy consumption, with respect to the reference 2007 scenario. - by 2030 increase of 30% of energy production from renewable sources; - by 2025 energy generation for electricity independent from the use of coal; | The study aligns closely with the decarbonisation and energy reduction pathways of residential multi family buildings with 1.5°C global warming target in Sweden. This study will also contribute to the achievement of the carbon neturality of whole Borlänge city by 2030. | Carbon neutrality by 2035 | - Testing the combination of renewable technologies at district level. - Optimization of the generation side based on the weather forecasting and demand side. - Optimization of the control system, connected to the central node, to design and perform virtual analyses based on the combination of all the systems and infrastructures. - Optimization of ICT systems. - Design and management of a virtual analysis - Optimization of efficient measures: building performance, user´s behaviour… - Combination of flexible storage systems to operate the global installation. | |||||||
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid | |||||||||||
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
A3P003: Other | |||||||||||
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities | |||||||||||
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities | Bologna needs to reach the climate neutrality proceeding by ‘part’ of the city. Pilastro-Roveri is a promising district due to the following reasons: - some buildings need to be renovated both to increase the energy performance, the seismic behaviour, spaces liveability and comfort; - Pilastro is a residential area with the presence of a high percentage of vulnerable inhabitants affected by energy poverty phenomenon. This situation needs to be prioritized; - Pilastro is characterized by the presence of large underused green spaces that can represent a valuable resource for social cohesion and for heat island phenomenon mitigation; - Roveri is an industrial area where some small-medium enterprises are investing in order to improve their facilities and to efficiency their production cycle; - Roveri and Pilastro areas present complementary energy consumption curves throughout the day/week with a high potential for energy sharing and flexibility. | In our project, we carried out a comprehensive exploration of strategies to achieve positive energy districts in a Swedish residential portfolio. The focus on urban energy transitions necessitates a holistic approach that integrates building retrofit, solar technology exploration, and heating supply optimisation. Exploration of Local Solar Sources: The analysis reveals varying solar irradiance resources throughout the year, emphasizing the importance of strategic placement. Integration of combined photovoltaic and thermal panels into building envelopes demonstrates the potential to cover a significant portion of the energy demand even in Sweden. Heating Supply Optimisation with Solar Technologies: Despite the surplus energy production from on-site solar technology, challenges arise due to temporal energy asymmetry. The introduction of heat pumps emerges as a feasible solution to balance energy gaps, utilising both rejected and free heat. Optimisation scenarios, utilising a combination of geothermal heat pumps, water source heat pumps, and PVT, showcase remarkable reductions in emissions and primary energy consumption. Urban Form and Energy Infrastructure Design: We realised the importance of returning to urban form and energy infrastructure design to optimise future residential portfolio potential. Building layout design, influenced by zoning regulations and innovative typologies, plays a crucial role in achieving district level energy efficiency. Future challenges, including demographic shifts, e-mobility, and climate change, necessitate a more holistic approach to energy infrastructure design, addressing not only heating and electricity demands but also cooling requirements. | Developing and demonstrating solutions for carbon neutrality | - Create a thermal energy storage tank to be used for air conditioning the buildings. - Some buildings need to be renovated both to increase the energy performance, the seismic behaviour and spaces liveability and comfort. - Optimizing the coupling between technologies. - Guarantee the flexibility to operate the renewable installations to operate in different phases and with different configurations. - CEDER is a public research center and needs to have connected any energy system to the same grid. - CEDER has an industrial develop area where some experimental thermal storage system could be tested. | According to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary with heat pumps. Rooftop photovoltaic panels also have the potential for renewable energy generation. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity through this scenario. | ||||||
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour | |||||||||||
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour | Bologna SECAP, as well as the participation to the 100 Climate-Neutral Cities, promotes the PED model as an enabling tool to foster city energy transition process. In Pilastro-Roveri district two main sustainable behaviours approaches can be identified: - bottom-up approach - some citizens are joining forces to create groups of energy self-consumption, in view of energy communities’ implementation and, at the same time, some companies have already undertaken some efficiency intervention on the production system by leveraging highly energy-efficient technologies; - top-down approach - GECO and GRETA are international ongoing projects on the area that promote innovation and energy transition with important fundings from the European Union, but with a particular focus on citizen engagement and participatory approach. Simultaneously, new and updated planning tools such as PUG, SECAP and SUMP identify in this part of Bologna city a key area to enable an ecological transition process holding together all relevant stakeholders - citizens, small-medium enterprises and Institutions. These two thrusts (bottom-up and top-down) need to be optimized in view of a participatory pathway towards the grounding of a Positive Energy District in Pilastro-Roveri. | While our investigation primarily centres on technical optimisation within Positive Energy District (PED) development, it is essential to acknowledge the broader scope encompassing social and governance dimensions. Specifically, understanding stakeholders' willingness to embrace technical recommendations upon project completion is important. Several potential influencing factors merit exploration, including economic considerations, technical optimisation-associated embodied carbon balance, the general public's technical perceptions, and operational feasibility. Evaluating these aspects holistically not only enhances the efficacy of PED initiatives but also fosters greater acceptance and participation within the communities they serve. | E. g. visualizing energy and water consumption | - Minimize the building energy consumption while maintaining indoor comfort levels. - Onsite renewable production with flexible storage elements to fix demand side and generation side. - Flexible control solutions through digitalization systems. | |||||||
A3P006: Economic strategies | |||||||||||
A3P006: Economic strategies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
A3P006: Other | operational savings through efficiency measures | ||||||||||
A3P007: Social models | |||||||||||
A3P007: Social models |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A3P007: Other | |||||||||||
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies | |||||||||||
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
A3P008: Other | |||||||||||
A3P009: Environmental strategies | |||||||||||
A3P009: Environmental strategies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
A3P009: Other | Positive Energy Balance for the demo site | Energy Positive, Low Emission Zone | |||||||||
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects | |||||||||||
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects | PEDs in Italy are meant as strategies towards climate-neutrality: at national/regional/local level a specific legislation on PEDs development is not yet available. However, the European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (‘Renewable energy’ directive - 2018/2001/EU and ‘Common rules for the internal electricity market’ directive- 2019/944/EU). Italy, starting from 2020, has transposed the Directives at national level (‘Milleproroghe’ decree then made effective by ‘Promotion of Renewable sources’ decree 199/2021). At regional level Emilia Romagna in May 2022 developed a law encouraging EC model diffusion (LR 5/2022 ‘Promotion and support of renewable energy communities and renewable energy self-consumers acting collectively’). Energy Community, according to Lindholm et al. 2021, can be considered as ‘a first implementation step towards PEDs.’ | - European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (Renewable energy directive - 2018/2001/EU and Common rules for the internal electricity market directive- 2019/944/EU). - Spanish building certification is regulated through Royal Decree 235/2013. | |||||||||
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition | |||||||||||
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition | Pilastro-Roveri district can be considered as a PED-relevant area. Even though at the moment the area doesn’t meet annual energy positive balance, it addresses some relevant key aspects listed in the JPI UE PED Framework Definition such as: - high level of aspiration in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production; - integration of different systems and infrastructures; - inclusion of aspects not only related to energy sector, but also connected with social, economic and environmental sustainability. | The Rymdgatan's Residential Portfolio in Sweden presents a compelling case study for its classification as a PED-related research, given its alignment with sustainable behaviours and overarching PED development principles as follows: Inclusivity and Social Equity: The residential portfolio situated in Rymdgatan caters primarily to a low-income community. By focusing on this demographic, the project addresses critical aspects of social equity within sustainable urban development. Ensuring access to energy-efficient housing and amenities for economically disadvantaged populations not only fosters social cohesion but also mitigates energy poverty, a pressing concern in many urban contexts. Multifamily Residential Building: The inclusion of multifamily residential buildings within the portfolio underscores a commitment to density and efficient land use, both essential components of sustainable urban design. Such developments promote resource optimisation by consolidating housing units, thereby reducing per capita energy consumption and infrastructure demands. Moreover, multifamily dwellings often facilitate community engagement and shared resource management, fostering a culture of sustainability among residents. Low Carbon Retrofitting and Transition: The overarching initiative to transition the entire Jakobsgårdarna district. The included Rymdgatan portfolio, towards low carbon retrofitting, represents a significant example of decarbonization and climate resilience. By integrating energy-efficient technologies and renewable energy solutions into existing infrastructure, the project not only reduces carbon emissions but also serves as a blueprint for revitalising old urban environments sustainably. This holistic approach to retrofitting demonstrates a systemic commitment to environmental stewardship and long-term sustainability. Climate Adaptation and Renewable Energy Integration: Despite Sweden's climatic challenges, including lower solar resources during winter months, the Rymdgatan project leverages its geographical context to optimize renewable energy utilization. Sweden's greater solar resource availability during summer and geothermal potentials complement the design's emphasis on seasonal energy planning, where surplus energy generated during peak periods can be stored or redistributed efficiently. By embracing climate-responsive design strategies, the project demonstrates resilience in the face of climate variability while harnessing renewable energy potential effectively. | The PED main objective is to achieve the energy transition while preserving cultural heritage and improving citizen’s quality of life. | The original idea is that the area produces at least as much it consumes. | Çamlık District, unlike many other districts in Ankara, has a specific urban morphology that draws near the other pilot zones considered by the partners of PED-ACT. The site has three-storey single housing units, along with a fair amount of greenery around. Furthermore, the roof areas enable large amounts of PV installment, which results in higher amounts of local renewable energy potential. Therefore, the district is a good fit for PED development. | ExPEDite aims at creating and deploying a novel digital twin, allowing for real-time monitoring, visualization and management of district-level energy flows. Cities consume 65% of the world’s energy supply and are responsible for 70% of the CO² emissions, hence sharing a lot of the responsibility for climate change. We are faced with the challenge of redesigning our existing cities to make them more sustainable, resilient, inclusive and safe. Developing Positive Energy Districts (PEDs), is a breakthrough way to deal with the issue of urban emissions and applying adaptation and mitigation strategies to climate change, while ensuring that these urban areas generate an annual surplus of renewable energy and net zero greenhouse gas emissions. PEDs must address environmental, economic and social issues, providing solutions to energy consumption, production, emissions, transport & mobility and livability. By constantly monitoring and evaluating parameters through existing and/or novel sensor systems (e.g., renewable energy production/supply, transport conditions, air quality, energy demand, meteorological conditions, etc.), unconventional techniques may be applied to provide more sustainable options for the district’s needs. | |||||
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development | |||||||||||
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development | Pilastro-Roveri district is not actually meant to become a PEDs. However, it can be considered as a PED-relevant case-study since a participatory transition pathway towards a more sustainable, efficient and resilient district is gaining ground, involving the main urban stakeholders. At the same time, the most recent city plan and policies (such as the city SECAPs - updated in 2021) are promoting PED model as a key strategy to guide Bologna towards climate neutrality by 2030. | Borlänge city has committed to become the carbon-neutral city by 2030. | POCITYF brings together eight cities (Lightouse and Fellow cities), all having cultural heritage areas in their territory. All are intrinsically motivated to participate in the necessary energy transition not only for their conventional city districts of mixed-used, but also for districts with individually specificities as those belonging in their cultural heritage, which at the moment may be acting as barriers for their further environmental sustainability, but after POCITYF will be acting as a promising building retrofits roadmap for similar and other EU cities. | Developing systems towards carbon neutrality. Also urban renewal. | PED-ACT project. | Expected outcome 1 Increased number of (tangible) city planning actions for positive clean energy districts using the (proto-)PED design, development and management digital twin tools (based on pre-market research learnings) using open-standards based components which can be reused elsewhere. 2 Increased integration of existing smaller scale management systems (e.g. Building management systems) with open-standards based operational city platforms using sectorial data (e.g. building data, mobility, urban planning, etc.). 3 Enhanced data gathering approaches with identification of relevant multidimensional data sets (e.g. meteorological, load profile, social, geo-spatial, etc.) high-resolution real-time data streams (e.g. renewable energy production, energy consumption), and relevant forecasting data, drawing also on the work of common European data spaces. 4 Increased number of city planning departments / approaches using common data and (replicable) elements and processes. 5 Consolidated city sensor network specifications, complemented by appropriate data gathering approaches for soft data. 6 Improved performance of AI based self-learning systems for optimization of positive clean energy districts and bottom-up complex models. 7 Enhanced innovation capacity of local/regional administrations and accelerated uptake of shared, smart and sustainable zero emission solutions. | |||||
B1P003: Environment of the case study area | |||||||||||
B2P003: Environment of the case study area | Urban area | Urban area | Urban area | Urban area | Urban area | Suburban area | Suburban area | Rural | Suburban area | Urban area | |
B1P004: Type of district | |||||||||||
B2P004: Type of district |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
B1P005: Case Study Context | |||||||||||
B1P005: Case Study Context |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
B1P006: Year of construction | |||||||||||
B1P006: Year of construction | 1990 | 2024 | 1986 | ||||||||
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential | |||||||||||
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential | 4500 | 100 | 3500 | ||||||||
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential | |||||||||||
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential | 100 | 3500 | |||||||||
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential | |||||||||||
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential | 6 | ||||||||||
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential | |||||||||||
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential | 6 | ||||||||||
B1P011: Population density before intervention | |||||||||||
B1P011: Population density before intervention | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
B1P012: Population density after intervention | |||||||||||
B1P012: Population density after intervention | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.010658622423328 | 0 | 0 | 0.058333333333333 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention | |||||||||||
B1P013: Residential | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | no | no | yes | no | yes | no |
B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²] | 4360 | 50800 | |||||||||
B1P013: Office | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||||
B1P013: Industry and Utility | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||||
B1P013: Commercial | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||||
B1P013: Institutional | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||||
B1P013: Natural areas | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||||
B1P013: Recreational | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||||
B1P013: Dismissed areas | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||||
B1P013: Other | no | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²] | 706 | ||||||||||
B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention | |||||||||||
B1P014: Residential | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | no | yes | no |
B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²] | 4360 | 50800 | |||||||||
B1P014: Office | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||||
B1P014: Industry and Utility | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||||
B1P014: Commercial | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||||
B1P014: Institutional | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||||
B1P014: Natural areas | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||||
B1P014: Recreational | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||||
B1P014: Dismissed areas | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||||
B1P014: Other | no | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²] | 706 | ||||||||||
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition | |||||||||||
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition | |||||||||||
B2P002: Installation life time | |||||||||||
B2P002: Installation life time | CEDER will follow an integrative approach including technology for a permanent installation. | ||||||||||
B2P003: Scale of action | |||||||||||
B2P003: Scale | District | District | District | ||||||||
B2P004: Operator of the installation | |||||||||||
B2P004: Operator of the installation | CIEMAT. Data detail in contact: mariano.martin@ciemat.es and oscar.izquiedo@ciemat.es | ||||||||||
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials | |||||||||||
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials | |||||||||||
B2P006: Circular Economy Approach | |||||||||||
B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials? | No | No | |||||||||
B2P006: Other | |||||||||||
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab | |||||||||||
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab |
|
| |||||||||
B2P007: Other | |||||||||||
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab | |||||||||||
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab | Municipality | Research center/University | |||||||||
B2P008: Other | |||||||||||
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab | |||||||||||
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab |
|
| |||||||||
B2P009: Other | |||||||||||
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities | |||||||||||
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities | The operation of the laboratory with all the components of the energy networks requires a collaborative work between various departments and entities. On the one hand, it is necessary to optimize the operation of renewable systems based on the weather conditions, forecast of the demand side and the flexibility of the generation systems. On the other hand, the optimization of the energy demands through a more sustainable behaviour of both the building and the users want to be acquired. For this, it is necessary to take into account technical aspects but also market, comfort and encourage the user participation, creating a decision-making matrix that allows optimizing the operation of the global system. | ||||||||||
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab | |||||||||||
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab |
|
|
| ||||||||
B2P011: Other | |||||||||||
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab | |||||||||||
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab |
|
|
| ||||||||
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people | |||||||||||
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people | |||||||||||
B2P014: Monitoring measures | |||||||||||
B2P014: Monitoring measures |
|
| |||||||||
B2P015: Key Performance indicators | |||||||||||
B2P015: Key Performance indicators |
|
|
| ||||||||
B2P016: Execution of operations | |||||||||||
B2P016: Execution of operations | |||||||||||
B2P017: Capacities | |||||||||||
B2P017: Capacities | - Innovative grid configuration to connect bio boilers and solar thermal on buildings. - Environmental & air quality evaluation. - Testing and evaluation of high efficient heating & cooling systems: Gas, biomass, geothermal and absorption H&C pumps … - Definition and implementation of the different regulation modes for the global system. Using the data from the research focused-partners, several regulation modes for the DH network could be defined and implemented in order to obtain an optimal operation of the network. - Innovation in MPC control to enable harvesting 100% renewables in the most efficient way. - Physical integration of the technologies with the existing facilities at the living lab. - Connection between the solar thermal collectors to achieve the lowest heat losses, providing the possibility to use the grid as high or low temperature DH, according to the demand schedule of the buildings. - Test the bio-boiler of the last generation and ultra-low emissions biomass condensing boiler in order to increase efficiency and reduce GHG and air pollutant emissions of the DH plant. - Control of the supply temperature of the DH grid to enable 100% renewables harvesting in the most efficient way. - Research of the incidence of a normal building or a bioclimatic building in the DH grid demand. - Methodologies for concept validation: Definition of the minimum requirements to verify the suitability of the solutions proposed. - Tests campaign: Experimental operation and characterization in a relevant environment, to exploit the technologies at their best and test different demand profiles, different configuration and loads, with real time monitoring and continuous commissioning to control the performance of the technology. - Validation and upgrading recommendation for the DH&C at district level. - Evaluation of innovation actions for potential energy interventions with demand response in buildings. - The complete available infrastructure (MV and LV electric systems, transformation hubs, end consumption, generation sources, communication elements, etc.) belongs to CEDER-CIEMAT, making this the perfect scenario to test and try the performance of “Smart Grid” and “Microgrid” projects. - The type of electric grid, its voltage levels (MV or LV), its variety of real loads (different buildings with different profiles: industrial buildings, offices and so on) and its sources of renewable generation and storage, mean it is ideal for intermediate tests between a small-scale laboratory and final deployment of the real product. | ||||||||||
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders | |||||||||||
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders | CEDER - CIEMAT is a public research body assigned to the Ministry of Science and Innovation under the General Secretariat for Research, focusing on energy and environment. To develop this lab CIEMAT has relations with private renewable companies, research centers and academia institutions. | ||||||||||
B2P019: Available tools | |||||||||||
B2P019: Available tools |
|
| |||||||||
B2P019: Available tools | |||||||||||
B2P020: External accessibility | |||||||||||
B2P020: External accessibility | CIEMAT is a public body, so it´s open to any institution according the actual regulation and agreements. | ||||||||||
C1P001: Unlocking Factors | |||||||||||
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | |
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | |
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | |
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | |
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | |
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | |
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | |
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up) | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | |
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down) | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | |
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.) | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | |
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | |
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | |
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | |
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES) | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | |
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | |
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any) | |||||||||||
C1P002: Driving Factors | |||||||||||
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | |
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency) | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | |
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | |
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | |
C1P002: Economic growth need | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.) | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | |
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | |
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | |
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any) | |||||||||||
C1P003: Administrative barriers | |||||||||||
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | |
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P003: Lack of public participation | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | |
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos) | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any) | |||||||||||
C1P004: Policy barriers | |||||||||||
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any) | |||||||||||
C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers | |||||||||||
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | |
C1P005: Regulatory instability | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P005: Non-effective regulations | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | |
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any) | |||||||||||
C1P006: Environmental barriers | |||||||||||
C1P006: Environmental barriers | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | - Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Water Scarcity: 1 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 | ||||||||
C1P007: Technical barriers | |||||||||||
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P007: Deficient planning | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | |
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | |
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any) | |||||||||||
C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers | |||||||||||
C1P008: Inertia | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | |
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P008: Rebound effect | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any) | |||||||||||
C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers | |||||||||||
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any) | |||||||||||
C1P010: Financial barriers | |||||||||||
C1P010: Hidden costs | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | |
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P010: Economic crisis | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any) | |||||||||||
C1P011: Market barriers | |||||||||||
C1P011: Split incentives | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P011: Energy price distortion | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | |
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs) | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | |
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any) | |||||||||||
C1P012: Stakeholders involved | |||||||||||
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
C1P012: Research & Innovation |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
C1P012: Financial/Funding |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
C1P012: Business process management |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
C1P012: Urban Services providers |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
C1P012: Real Estate developers |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
C1P012: Design/Construction companies |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
C1P012: Other | |||||||||||
C1P012: Other (if any) | |||||||||||
Summary |
![](https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/capture-1024x577.png)
Authors (framework concept)
Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)
Contributors (to the content)
Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)
Implemented by
Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)