PED DB: Case Studies – PED-EU-NET

Filters:

Name	Project	Type	Compare
Örebro-Vivalla	JUST PEPP	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger	JUST PEPP	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Texel	JUST PEPP	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Hällefors, Sweden	JUST PEPP	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Pamplona	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente	COPPER	PED Lab	Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet)	PED StepWise	PED Case Study	Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park	PED StepWise	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten	PED StepWise	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg	HeatCOOP	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH	HeatCOOP	PED Lab	Compare
Tartu, Annelinn	V2G-QUESTS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland	V2G-QUESTS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district	V2G-QUESTS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Lecce, SmartEnCity	SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
STARDUST, Trento	STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities	PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern		PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki		PED Relevant Case Study	Uncompare
Firenze, Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0,		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo		PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna		PED Case Study	Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento		PED Case Study	Uncompare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna		PED Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB)	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Võru +CityxChange		PED Case Study	Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Furuset project, Oslo	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights		PED Case Study	Compare
Ydalir project	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport)	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Fornebu, Bærum	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou		PED Case Study	Compare
Smart Energy Åland		PED Case Study	Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED	ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts	PED Case Study	Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED	InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts	PED Case Study	Compare
Munich, Harthof district		PED Case Study	Uncompare
Lublin	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran	CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116	CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Findhorn, the Park	InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts	PED Case Study	Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED	ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Case Study	Compare
Aalborg East		PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Trenčín	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf	LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis	NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts	PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods	PED Case Study	Uncompare
Uden, Loopkantstraat	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods	PED Relevant Case Study
Zaragoza, Actur	NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand	BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts	PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city	ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins	PED Case Study	Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Case Study	Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus	LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Espoo, Kera	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee	PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district	PED Case Study	Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe		PED Case Study	Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district		PED Case Study	Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark		PED Case Study	Compare
Évora, Portugal	POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework	PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Groningen, PED South	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Lab	Compare
Groningen, PED North	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Lab	Uncompare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Lab	Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT		PED Lab	Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district	STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities	PED Relevant Case Study	Uncompare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Case Study	Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Case Study	Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods	PED Case Study	Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods	PED Case Study	Compare
Tartu, City centre area	SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe	PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district	GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab		PED Lab	Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Case Study	Compare
Kifissia, Energy community	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare

Title	Uden, Loopkantstraat	Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento «×»	Munich, Harthof district «×»	Groningen, PED North «×»	Oslo, Verksbyen «×»	Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district «×»	Helsinki, mySMARTlife «×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab	Uden, Loopkantstraat	Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento	Munich, Harthof district	Groningen, PED North	Oslo, Verksbyen	Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district	Helsinki, mySMARTlife
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/07/UDEN.png, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/07/42.jpg, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/07/41.jpg, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/07/40.jpg, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/07/47.jpg	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/Uffici-comunali-in-via-San-Giovanni-Bosco-via-ai-lavori_imagefull.jpg, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/Trento.JPG	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/09/Bild-Quartier-Harthof.png	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2022/09/netherlands.JPG, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2022/09/netherlands2.jpg	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/07/Panorama.bilde_.jpg, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/07/Picture2.jpg, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/07/Picture3.jpg	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2022/08/3.png, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2022/08/21.jpg, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2022/08/11.png	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/csm_helsinki-merihaka1_3afe08d7cd.jpg
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case study	no	yes	yes	no	yes	no	no
PED relevant case study	yes	no	no	no	no	yes	yes
PED Lab.	no	no	no	yes	no	no	no
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutrality	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes
Annual energy surplus	yes	no	yes	yes	yes	no	no
Energy community	no	no	yes	yes	no	yes	no
Circularity	no	no	no	yes	no	no	no
Air quality and urban comfort	no	no	no	no	yes	no	no
Electrification	yes	no	no	no	no	yes	no
Net-zero energy cost	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
Net-zero emission	no	no	no	yes	yes	yes	no
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
Maximise self-sufficiency	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
Other	no	yes	no	no	no	no	no
Other (A1P004)		energy efficient
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED Lab	In operation	In operation	Implementation Phase	Implementation Phase	Implementation Phase	Completed	Completed
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date	06/17	12/17	01/23	12/18	07/18	04/14	11/16
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date	05/23		12/27	12/23	08/24	10/23	11/21
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods,			MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future,	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods,	STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities,
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability			Monitoring data available within the districts, Open data city platform – different dashboards, General statistical datasets, GIS open datasets	Monitoring data available within the districts, Open data city platform – different dashboards, GIS open datasets		Monitoring data available within the districts, Open data city platform – different dashboards, Meteorological open data
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab	Inger Andresen, Tonje Healey Trulsrud, Luca Finocchiaro, Alessandro Nocente, Meril Tamm, Joana Ortiz, Jaume Salom, Abel Magyari, Linda Hoes-van Oeffelen, Wouter Borsboom, Wim Kornaat, Niki Gaitani, Design and performance predictions of plus energy neighbourhoods – Case studies of demonstration projects in four different European climates, Energy and Buildings, Volume 274, 2022, 112447, ISSN 0378-7788, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112447. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778822006181), Deliverable, Report: Integrated Energy Design for Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods (syn.ikia), Deliverable, Report: DEMONSTRATION CASE OF SUSTAINABLE PLUS ENERGY NEIGHBOURHOODS IN MARINE CLIMATE (syn.ikia), https://www.synikia.eu/no/bibliotek/	http://www.trentoblog.it/wp-content/uploads/Santa_Chiara.pdf	www.ascend-project.eu, ascend-muenchen.de	TNO, Hanze, RUG, Ped noord book	https://www.synikia.eu/no/	None yet, but coming	https://www.mysmartlife.eu/cities/helsinki/, https://kartta.hel.fi/3d/atlas/#/
A1P011: Geographic coordinates
X Coordinate (longitude):	5.6191	11.126633	11.569625059947604	6.535121	10.986173354432992	23.798083	24.983148
Y Coordinate (latitude):	51.6606	46.063685	48.20436261275152	53.234846	59.22429716642046	61.464088	60.187947
A1P012: Country
A1P012: Country	Netherlands	Italy	Germany	Netherlands	Norway	Finland	Finland
A1P013: City
A1P013: City	Uden	Trento	Munich	Groningen	Fredrikstad	Tampere	Helsinki
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).	Cfb	Cfa	Cfb	Cfa	Cfb	Dfb	Dfb
A1P015: District boundary
A1P015: District boundary	Geographic		Geographic	Functional	Geographic	Virtual
Other
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:	Private	Mixed	Mixed	Mixed	Private	Mixed	Mixed
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:	Single Owner	Multiple Owners	Multiple Owners	Multiple Owners	Single Owner	Multiple Owners	Multiple Owners
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED	1		126	7	2	6
A1P019: Conditioned space
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]	2360		206	1.01	3550	9.000
A1P020: Total ground area
A1P020: Total ground area [m²]	3860		560	17.132		25.000
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area	1	0	0	0	0	0	0
A1P022: Financial schemes
A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estate	yes	no	no	yes	yes	yes	no
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]	7804440
A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO scheme	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Other	no	yes	no	yes	no	yes	no
A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural funding	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National funding	no	yes	no	yes	no	yes	no
A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]		41000000
A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional funding	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal funding	no	yes	yes	yes	no	no	yes
A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EU	no	no	yes	yes	no	yes	no
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - National	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regional	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Other	no	yes	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022: Other
A1P023: Economic Targets
A1P023: Economic Targets				Boosting local businesses, Boosting local and sustainable production		Boosting local and sustainable production
A1P023: Other
A1P024: More comments:
A1P024: More comments:	The project is a follow-up from the “Social Beautiful” concept which was developed in collaboration between Labyrint (Support in sheltered housing), Area (housing company), the municipality of Uden, and Hendriks Coppelmans (developer). The concept aims to provide an answer to changes in various policy areas and the changing demands of society. The Social Beautiful concept consists of the following elements: 1. Living, working, and community services are brought together in one location. A multifunctional residential and service centre is being realized at the location. 2. Housing is shaped by the realization of financially accessible homes suitable for the target group. The housing design is tailored to the target group. it may also include sheltered / protected living. 3. Work takes place at the location or from the same location. The work has a social function within the neighbourhood. Wage-related work must contribute to providing structure in the daily activities of the residents. 4. Neighbourhood management is organized from the location in the surrounding neighbourhood. A service package is provided from the residential and service centre that contributes to the ability of neighbourhood residents to live independently for longer, to strengthen the social network, and to improve the quality of life and safety in the neighbourhood. 5. The houses are suitable for use at all times for regular rental. Communal facilities must be realized within the contours of a regular apartment. The objective is to offer a suitable living and working situation to a group of vulnerable citizens. In this way they become a fully-fledged part of society. They not only make use of the facilities themselves, but also give substance to the level of facilities in the municipality. Due to the integrated approach, they experience a greater sense of well-being and security.				The total development consists of more than 1500 dwellings, a kindergarten, a school, and commercial buildings. Two of the residential blocks are included as demonstration projects in syn.ikia. The two blocks have 20 dwellings in each and are 6 stories high.
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]	7804440
Contact person for general enquiries
A1P026: Name	Tonje Healey Trulsrud	Christoph Gollner	Stefan Synek	Jasper Tonen, Elisabeth Koops	Tonje Healey Trulsrud	Senior Scientist Terttu Vainio	Christoph Gollner
A1P027: Organization	Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)	FFG	City of Munich	Municipality of Groningen	Norwegian University of Science and technology (NTNU)	VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland	FFG
A1P028: Affiliation	Research Center / University	Other	Municipality / Public Bodies	Municipality / Public Bodies	Research Center / University	Research Center / University	Other
A1P028: Other			Andreas Bärnreuther
A1P029: Email	tonje.h.trulsrud@ntnu.no	christoph.gollner@ffg.at	stefan.synek@muenchen.de	Jasper.tonen@groningen.nl	tonje.h.trulsrud@ntnu.no	terttu.vainio@vtt.fi	christoph.gollner@ffg.at
Contact person for other special topics
A1P030: Name			Stefan Synek
A1P031: Email			stefan.synek@muenchen.de
Pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
A2P001: Fields of application
A2P001: Fields of application	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production, Waste management, Indoor air quality, Construction materials	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production, E-mobility, Digital technologies, Construction materials	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production, E-mobility, Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.), Waste management	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production, E-mobility, Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.), Digital technologies, Indoor air quality	Energy efficiency, Energy production, Digital technologies	Energy efficiency, E-mobility, Digital technologies
A2P001: Other
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields	Energy efficiency: Energy efficient envelope, with good insulation, triple glazing windows and airtight envelope. (EPC = 0) Energy Flexibility: MCP controls for the heat pump in the apartments. Energy production: PV panels on the roof, Ground source heat pumps Waste management: construction waste was kept to a minimum and sorted and collected separately as much as possible. Indoor air quality: Exhaust ventilation and opening of windows Construction materials: low carbon emission building materials			Energy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streams	Energy efficiency: energy-efficient buildings that comply with the Norwegian Passive House standard. Energy Flexibility: sharing of PV energy between the dwellings Energy production: BIPV on the roof and facades, and a ground source heat pump for thermal energy. E-mobility: EV charging Urban comfort: a large green park in the neighbourhood with a small lake and recreational areas Digital technologies: Smart Home Systems for lighting, heating and ventilation Indoor air quality: balanced ventilation	Energy efficiency: - A-class buildings - Heating by GSHP Energy production: - Installation of photovoltaic (PV) Digital technologies: - Smart control and monitoring of HVAC and indoor circumstances E-mobility - Installation of charging stations for electric vehicles;
A2P003: Application of ISO52000
A2P003: Application of ISO52000	Yes			No	Yes	No
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance	No		Yes	No	No	Yes
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance	No		No	No	No	No
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation	not included			Mobility, till now, is not included in the energy model.
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]	0.148			2.3	0.16	0
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]	0.109			0.33	0.053	0.7
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P011: PV	yes	no	yes	no	yes	yes	no
A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]	0.058				0.18	0.7
A2P011: Wind	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Hydro	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: PVT_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P012: Geothermal	yes	no	no	yes	no	yes	no
A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Solar Thermal	no	no	yes	yes	no	no	no
A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_heat	no	no	no	yes	no	no	no
A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]				0.1
A2P012: Waste heat+HP	no	no	no	yes	no	no	no
A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_peat_heat	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: PVT_th	no	no	no	yes	no	no	no
A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_firewood_th	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes	*Annual energy use below is presentedin primary energy consumption			Geothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centers		PV plant of energy community locates outside of the city, not on the slot
A2P014: Annual energy use
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]	0.194					0.7
A2P015: Annual energy delivered
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]	0.0368
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]						0
A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P017: Gas	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Coal	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Oil	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P018: PV	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Wind	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Hydro	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_el	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_peat_el	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: PVT_el	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P019: Geothermal	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Solar Thermal	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_heat	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Waste heat+HP	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_peat_heat	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: PVT_th	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_firewood_th	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]	-0.00043				-6.035	0
A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
A2P022: Safety & Security	Personal Safety				Personal Safety
A2P022: Health	Healthy community				Healthy community + Indoor Evironmental Quality (indoor air quality, thermal comfort, lighting and visual comfort)
A2P022: Education
A2P022: Mobility	Sustainable mobility				Sustainable mobility
A2P022: Energy	NOn-renewable primary energy balance, renewable energy ratio, grid purchase factor, load cover factor/self-generation, supply cover factor/self-consumption, net energy/net power, peak delivered/peak expoted, total greenhouse gas emission		Energy		Energy and environmental performance (non-renewable primary energy balance, renewable energy ratio, grid purchase factor, load cover factor/self-generation, supply cover factor/ self-consumption, net energy/net power. peak delivered(peak exported power, connection capacity credit, total greenhouse gas emissions
A2P022: Water
A2P022: Economic development	capital costs, operational cots, overall economic performance (5 KPIs)				Economic Performance: capital costs, operational costs, overall performance
A2P022: Housing and Community	demographic composition, diverse community, social cohesion				demopraphic composiiton, diverse community, social cohesion access to amenities, access to services, afordability of energy, affordability of shousing, living conditions, universal design, energy consciousness
A2P022: Waste
A2P022: Other	Smartness and flecibility, Indoor Environmental Quality, Social performance - Equity (affordable housing, access to servicees and amenitioes, afforability of energy, living conditions, sustinable mobility, universal design)				Smartness and Flexibility
A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
A2P023: Photovoltaics	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes	no
A2P023: Solar thermal collectors	no	yes	no	yes	no	no	yes
A2P023: Wind Turbines	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Geothermal energy system	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes
A2P023: Waste heat recovery	no	yes	no	yes	no	yes	yes
A2P023: Waste to energy	no	no	no	yes	no	no	no
A2P023: Polygeneration	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Co-generation	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Heat Pump	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes
A2P023: Hydrogen	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Hydropower plant	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Biomass	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Biogas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Other
A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)	no	no	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes
A2P024: Energy management system	yes	no	yes	yes	yes	yes	no
A2P024: Demand-side management	yes	no	no	yes	yes	yes	no
A2P024: Smart electricity grid	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P024: Thermal Storage	no	yes	yes	yes	no	no	no
A2P024: Electric Storage	no	no	yes	yes	no	no	no
A2P024: District Heating and Cooling	no	yes	yes	yes	no	no	yes
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systems	yes	no	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes
A2P024: P2P – buildings	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P024: Other						Electric grid as virtual battery
A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
A2P025: Deep Retrofitting	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildings	no	no	no	yes	no	no	no
A2P025: High-performance new buildings	yes	no	no	yes	yes	yes	no
A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)	no	no	no	yes	no	no	yes
A2P025: Urban data platforms	no	no	yes	yes	no	no	no
A2P025: Mobile applications for citizens	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)	yes	no	no	no	yes	yes	no
A2P025: Smart irrigation	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposal	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Smart surveillance	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Other
A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P026: e-Mobility	no	no	yes	yes	no	no	yes
A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutions	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P026: Car-free area	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P026: Other
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates	Yes		Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes	EPC = 0, energy neutral building			Energy Performance Certificate	NS3700 Norwegian Passive House
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates	No					No
A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy		Smart cities strategies, Urban Renewal Strategies, Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.)		Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.), New development strategies, National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality		Smart cities strategies, Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.), Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC), Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract), National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality	Smart cities strategies
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy			City wide climate neutrality by 2035, city administration climate neutrality by 2030
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid			Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps	Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps, Electrification of Cooking Methods, Biogas
A3P003: Other
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour				In Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed.
A3P006: Economic strategies
A3P006: Economic strategies			Open data business models	Innovative business models, Blockchain		Open data business models, Circular economy models
A3P006: Other
A3P007: Social models
A3P007: Social models	Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies, Social incentives, Quality of Life		Strategies towards (local) community-building, Behavioural Change / End-users engagement, Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance, Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)	Strategies towards (local) community-building, Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies, Citizen Social Research, Prevention of energy poverty, Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance		Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies, Behavioural Change / End-users engagement, Digital Inclusion, Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
A3P007: Other
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies				Strategic urban planning, District Energy plans, City Vision 2050, SECAP Updates		Strategic urban planning, Digital twinning and visual 3D models, SECAP Updates
A3P008: Other
A3P009: Environmental strategies
A3P009: Environmental strategies		Energy Neutral		Energy Neutral		Energy Neutral, Net zero carbon footprint, Carbon-free, Greening strategies, Sustainable Urban drainage systems (SUDS), Nature Based Solutions (NBS)	Carbon-free
A3P009: Other
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects			decision by the Munich City Council in 2019 to become climate neutral by 2030 / 2035	At national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen:  Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation.  Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries.  The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals.  Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricity
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition	The demonstration projects is a new residential development, which consists of an apartment complex which includes 39 apartments spread over 3 floors. It is a sustainble plus energy neighbouhood, and has reached a plus energy balance on its first year in operation. It has MPC controls on the individual heat pumps to improve the energy flexibility of the apartments. It includes the "social beatiful" concepts with a strong emphasis on the social sustainability of the project.		Munich as demonstrator together with Lyon in ASCEND project		The case study follows the concept of syn.ikia with sustainable plus energy neighbourhoods (SPEN) and aims to reach a plus energy balance based on EPB uses on an annual basis.
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development	The need for social housing and the ambition to create a great living environment with a high-performance apartment complex, supplied with renewable energy. It results in lower energy bills for the tenants and high-quality homes.		speed and scale of PEDs		The developers call their concept for Future Living, where the neighbourhood consist of highly energy-efficient buildings, is supplied with renewable energy onsite and includes green areas for well-being.
B1P003: Environment of the case study area
B2P003: Environment of the case study area	Suburban area	Urban area	Urban area		Suburban area	Suburban area	Urban area
B1P004: Type of district
B2P004: Type of district	New construction	New construction, Renovation	Renovation		New construction	New construction	New construction, Renovation
B1P005: Case Study Context
B1P005: Case Study Context	New Development	Re-use / Transformation Area, New Development, Retrofitting Area	Retrofitting Area		New Development	New Development	Re-use / Transformation Area, New Development, Retrofitting Area
B1P006: Year of construction
B1P006: Year of construction
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential			6			0
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential			6			300
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P011: Population density before intervention
B1P011: Population density before intervention	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
B1P012: Population density after intervention
B1P012: Population density after intervention	0	0	0.010714285714286	0	0	12	0
B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
B1P013: Residential	no	no	yes	no	no	no	yes
B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Office	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Industry and Utility	no	no	no	no	yes	no	no
B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]					whole site was used for idustry and excavation
B1P013: Commercial	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Institutional	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Natural areas	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Recreational	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Dismissed areas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
B1P014: Residential	yes	yes	yes	no	yes	yes	yes
B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]	2394
B1P014: Office	no	yes	no	no	no	no	yes
B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Industry and Utility	no	yes	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Commercial	no	yes	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Institutional	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Natural areas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Recreational	no	yes	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Dismissed areas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition				Groningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city.
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P002: Installation life time				The MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact.
B2P003: Scale of action
B2P003: Scale				District			District
B2P004: Operator of the installation
B2P004: Operator of the installation				The Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties.
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials				Groningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materials
B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?				No
B2P006: Other
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab				Civic
B2P007: Other
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab				Municipality
B2P008: Other
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab				Academia, Private, Industrial, Other
B2P009: Other				research companies, monitoring company, ict company
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab				Buildings, Demand-side management, Energy storage, Energy networks, Waste management, Lighting, E-mobility, Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), Social interactions, Business models
B2P011: Other
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab				Tools for prototyping and modelling
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P014: Monitoring measures				Execution plan, Available data, Type of measured data, Equipment, Level of access
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P015: Key Performance indicators				Energy, Social, Economical / Financial
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P017: Capacities
B2P017: Capacities
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P019: Available tools
B2P019: Available tools				Energy modelling, Social models, Business and financial models			Energy modelling
B2P019: Available tools
B2P020: External accessibility
B2P020: External accessibility
C1P001: Unlocking Factors
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important	5 - Very important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
C1P002: Driving Factors
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Economic growth need	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important	5 - Very important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)				Earthquakes due to gas extraction
C1P003: Administrative barriers
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of public participation	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)	Delay in the Environmental Dialogue processing in the municipality
C1P004: Policy barriers
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Regulatory instability	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Non-effective regulations	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)						laws favouring big energy companies
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P007: Technical barriers
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Deficient planning	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
C1P008: Inertia	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Rebound effect	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	4 - Important	4 - Important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
C1P010: Financial barriers
C1P010: Hidden costs	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Economic crisis	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
C1P011: Market barriers
C1P011: Split incentives	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Energy price distortion	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
C1P012: Stakeholders involved
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities	Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation		None	Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation	Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation	Planning/leading
C1P012: Research & Innovation	Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation, Monitoring/operation/management		None	Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Monitoring/operation/management	Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation, Monitoring/operation/management	Planning/leading, Construction/implementation, Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Financial/Funding			None	Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation		Construction/implementation
C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data			Monitoring/operation/management	Design/demand aggregation, Monitoring/operation/management		Design/demand aggregation, Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Business process management			Design/demand aggregation	Planning/leading		Planning/leading, Construction/implementation
C1P012: Urban Services providers			Planning/leading	Design/demand aggregation, Monitoring/operation/management		Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Real Estate developers	Planning/leading, Construction/implementation, Monitoring/operation/management		Planning/leading	Construction/implementation	Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation, Monitoring/operation/management	Planning/leading, Construction/implementation
C1P012: Design/Construction companies	Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation		Design/demand aggregation	Construction/implementation	Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation	Planning/leading, Construction/implementation
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens	Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation, Monitoring/operation/management		None	None		None
C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs			Monitoring/operation/management	Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation		None
C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce			Planning/leading	Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation, Monitoring/operation/management		Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation, Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Other					Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation
C1P012: Other (if any)
Summary

Authors (framework concept)

Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

Contributors (to the content)

Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

Implemented by

Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

Join the Action

COST

PED-EU-NET

Action Details