Filters:
NameProjectTypeCompare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Uncompare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Uncompare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Uncompare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Uncompare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Uncompare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleUden, Loopkantstraat
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district
Ankara, Çamlık District
Munich, Harthof district
Groningen, PED South
Graz, Reininghausgründe
Salzburg, Gneis district
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabUden, LoopkantstraatLeon, Former Sugar Factory districtAnkara, Çamlık DistrictMunich, Harthof districtGroningen, PED SouthGraz, ReininghausgründeSalzburg, Gneis district
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynoyesyesyesnoyesyes
PED relevant case studyyesnoyesnononono
PED Lab.nonononoyesnono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesnoyesyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusyesyesyesyesyesnoyes
Energy communitynonoyesyesyesnoyes
Circularitynonononoyesnono
Air quality and urban comfortnonononononoyes
Electrificationyesnoyesnononono
Net-zero energy costnonoyesnononono
Net-zero emissionnonoyesnoyesnono
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nonononononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynoyesyesnononono
Othernonononononono
Other (A1P004)
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabIn operationPlanning PhasePlanning PhaseImplementation PhaseImplementation PhaseImplementation PhaseCompleted
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date06/1712/1810/2201/2312/18201901/20
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date05/2312/2309/2512/2712/23202501/24
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • GIS open datasets
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
  • Inger Andresen, Tonje Healey Trulsrud, Luca Finocchiaro, Alessandro Nocente, Meril Tamm, Joana Ortiz, Jaume Salom, Abel Magyari, Linda Hoes-van Oeffelen, Wouter Borsboom, Wim Kornaat, Niki Gaitani, Design and performance predictions of plus energy neighbourhoods – Case studies of demonstration projects in four different European climates, Energy and Buildings, Volume 274, 2022, 112447, ISSN 0378-7788, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112447. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778822006181),
  • Deliverable, Report: Integrated Energy Design for Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods (syn.ikia),
  • Deliverable, Report: DEMONSTRATION CASE OF SUSTAINABLE PLUS ENERGY NEIGHBOURHOODS IN MARINE CLIMATE (syn.ikia),
  • https://www.synikia.eu/no/bibliotek/
  •  https://makingcity.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/MakingCity_D4_3_Analysis_of_FWC_candidate_areas_to_become_a_PED_Final.pdf.
  • TNO, Hanze, RUG,
  • Ped noord book
  • E. Rainer, H. Schnitzer, T. Mach, T. Wieland, M. Reiter, L. Fickert, E. Schmautzer, A. Passer, H. Oblak, H. Kreiner, R. Lazar, M. Duschek, et al. (2015): Rahmenplan Energy City Graz-Reininghaus – Subprojekt 2 des Leitprojektes „ECR Energy City Graz – Reininghaus Online: Rahmenplan Energy City Graz-Reininghaus - Haus der Zukunft (nachhaltigwirtschaften.at),
  • H.Schnitzer et al. (2016): Arbeiten und Wohnen in der Smart City Reininghaus, Online: Arbeiten und Wohnen in Graz Reininghaus - Smartcities
A1P011: Geographic coordinates
X Coordinate (longitude):5.6191-5.58479532.79536911.5696250599476046.59065515.40744013.041216
Y Coordinate (latitude):51.660642.59339139.88181248.2043626127515253.20408747.060747.771019
A1P012: Country
A1P012: CountryNetherlandsSpainTurkeyGermanyNetherlandsAustriaAustria
A1P013: City
A1P013: CityUdenLeonAnkaraMunichGroningenGrazSalzburg
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CfbCsbDsbCfbCfaDfbDfb
A1P015: District boundary
A1P015: District boundaryGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicFunctionalGeographicGeographic
Other
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:PrivateMixedPrivateMixedMixedMixedMixed
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Single OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle Owner
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED121257126410017
A1P019: Conditioned space
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]236016.06900226002067.86199762
A1P020: Total ground area
A1P020: Total ground area [m²]386073.145695080056045.0931000000
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area1000000
A1P022: Financial schemes
A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estateyesnononoyesyesno
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]7804440
A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernonononoyesnono
A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononononono
A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnonononoyesyesno
A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonononononono
A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnononoyesyesyesno
A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononono
A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnonoyesyesyesnoyes
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonoyesnononono
A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonononononono
A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononono
A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022: Other
A1P023: Economic Targets
A1P023: Economic Targets
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
  • Boosting local businesses,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
  • Job creation,
  • Boosting local businesses,
  • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
  • Positive externalities,
  • Other
A1P023: OtherBoosting social cooperation and social aid
A1P024: More comments:
A1P024: More comments:The project is a follow-up from the “Social Beautiful” concept which was developed in collaboration between Labyrint (Support in sheltered housing), Area (housing company), the municipality of Uden, and Hendriks Coppelmans (developer). The concept aims to provide an answer to changes in various policy areas and the changing demands of society. The Social Beautiful concept consists of the following elements: 1. Living, working, and community services are brought together in one location. A multifunctional residential and service centre is being realized at the location. 2. Housing is shaped by the realization of financially accessible homes suitable for the target group. The housing design is tailored to the target group. it may also include sheltered / protected living. 3. Work takes place at the location or from the same location. The work has a social function within the neighbourhood. Wage-related work must contribute to providing structure in the daily activities of the residents. 4. Neighbourhood management is organized from the location in the surrounding neighbourhood. A service package is provided from the residential and service centre that contributes to the ability of neighbourhood residents to live independently for longer, to strengthen the social network, and to improve the quality of life and safety in the neighbourhood. 5. The houses are suitable for use at all times for regular rental. Communal facilities must be realized within the contours of a regular apartment. The objective is to offer a suitable living and working situation to a group of vulnerable citizens. In this way they become a fully-fledged part of society. They not only make use of the facilities themselves, but also give substance to the level of facilities in the municipality. Due to the integrated approach, they experience a greater sense of well-being and security.The urban morphology of Çamlık District differs in several ways, compared with the typical urban fabric in Türkiye, along with the capital city of Ankara. The houses on the site are composed of three-story attached single-housing units with multiple rows, creating a total of 257 housing units in total. Low-rise buildings coupled with suitably oriented rooftop surfaces brings about significant advantages in the site. Dense greenery in the site also results in reduced cooling energy demand in the buildings.The “Reininghausgründe” are a new quarter near the centre of the City of Graz. In the area of a former brewery, close to more, still working industries, a new town centre is being established. It will include living areas, workplaces, shops, schools and a park, so that the need for individual mobility is minimized. It is connected to the city centre by bike paths, busses and a tram. Car sharing is provided as well. Some key-energy aspects: • characteristic 1: For the heat supply in the innovative Reininghaus energy model, low-temperature waste heat from a nearby steel plant is harnessed through the use of heat pumps. • characteristic 2: The district heating system operates at low temperatures. • characteristic 3: Generated heat that is not used immediately is stored in the power tower and supplied on demand. Other important aspects of the project are the following: • characteristic 1: Most houses are low-energy houses, some of the certified with the “Klima Aktiv” label • characteristic 2: There are extremely few parking possibilities for residents and visitors; this will foster the use of public transport and bikes • characteristic 3: All the necessary infrastructure for the “daily need” can be reached within walking distance The area of the project is going to be very “green” when finished. Featuring a big district parc, lots of other green spaces are in planning.
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]7804440
Contact person for general enquiries
A1P026: NameTonje Healey TrulsrudBegoña Gonzalo OrdenProf. Dr. İpek Gürsel DİNOStefan SynekJasper Tonen, Elisabeth KoopsKatharina SchwarzAbel Magyari
A1P027: OrganizationNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)Municipality of LeonMiddle East Technical UniversityCity of MunichMunicipality of GroningenStadtLABOR, Innovationen für urbane Lebensqualität GmbHABUD
A1P028: AffiliationResearch Center / UniversityOtherResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesSME / IndustryResearch Center / University
A1P028: OtherMunicipality of Leon - ILRUVAndreas Bärnreuther
A1P029: Emailtonje.h.trulsrud@ntnu.nobegona.gonzalo@aytoleon.esipekg@metu.edu.trstefan.synek@muenchen.deJasper.tonen@groningen.nlkatharina.schwarz@stadtlaborgraz.atmagyari.abel@abud.hu
Contact person for other special topics
A1P030: NameMonica Prada CorralAssoc. Prof. Onur TaylanStefan SynekHans SchnitzerStrassl Ingeborg
A1P031: EmailMonica.Prada@ilruv.esotaylan@metu.edu.trstefan.synek@muenchen.dehans.schnitzer@stadtlaborgraz.atinge.strassl@salzburg.gv.at
Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
A2P001: Fields of application
A2P001: Fields of application
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • Waste management,
  • Indoor air quality,
  • Construction materials
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Digital technologies
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy production,
  • Construction materials
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Digital technologies,
  • Construction materials
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
  • Waste management
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
  • Water use,
  • Indoor air quality,
  • Other
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production
A2P001: OtherUrban Management; Air Quality
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: Energy efficient envelope, with good insulation, triple glazing windows and airtight envelope. (EPC = 0) Energy Flexibility: MCP controls for the heat pump in the apartments. Energy production: PV panels on the roof, Ground source heat pumps Waste management: construction waste was kept to a minimum and sorted and collected separately as much as possible. Indoor air quality: Exhaust ventilation and opening of windows Construction materials: low carbon emission building materialsEnergy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit Energy production: - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Energy flexibility: - testing share energy solutions (public-private stakeholders) Digital technologies - smart city platform - smart energy management E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; - e-bike/bikesharing services implementation.The energy consumption and efficiency of the energy model of Çamlık Site, created using EnergyPlus software, have been evaluated under the scenarios specified below. At each stage, a new system was incorporated to explore the potential of the area becoming a PED. In this context, four scenarios were created to compare different energy scenarios for the Ankara pilot area and to observe the impact of the included systems on energy efficiency: V_base; V_ER; V_ER,HP; V_ER,HP,PV. The basic scenario (V_base) was created using the current state without any improvement to the building envelope. This scenario was developed to determine the annual energy needs of the entire site without any intervention and serves as a reference point for the other developed models. The second scenario (V_ER) was created to improve the building envelopes of all residential units in the area, altering the U-values according to Türkiye's current building standards (TS-825). The third scenario (V_ER,HP) primarily includes a heat pump model that can use electrical energy to produce higher thermal energy and is added on top of the improvements in the second scenario. Finally, the V_ER,HP,PV scenario combines building envelope improvements, the heat pump, and the solar PV system.Energy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streamsEnergy efficiency: o Several activities: Workshops, Webinars to deepen the knowledge and raise awareness renewable energies o for example rooftop Photovoltaics green & blue infrastructures o Parks, Rooftop Gardens, Quarter Parks, Water elements included in the parks rooftop farming o To produce vegetables in the quarter stormwater management mobility o less parking and less cars in the district. Solutions for boosting public transport with sponsored public transport tickets; building of better bike and pedestrian infrastructure social aspects o district management was established in the district local supply of goods of daily need o Schools within 15 minutes walking distance Supermarkets and other shops within the district- Dynamic district, and building scale energy modelling - Microclimate modelling - Klimaaktiv certification system - Energy community - Flexibility with shared heating and electricity systems
A2P003: Application of ISO52000
A2P003: Application of ISO52000YesNoYesNoNoYes
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoYesYesNoYesNo
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNoNoNoYesNo
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationnot includedMobility is not included in the calculations.Mobility, till now, is not included in the energy model.- Number of cars per household - Fraction of electric cars - Number of public transport tickets (week/ annual tickets)
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]0.1483.493.4461.86
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.1090.570.5281.45
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P011: PVyesyesyesyesnoyesyes
A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.0581.243.42400.7770664
A2P011: Windnonononononono
A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Hydronoyesnonononono
A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]1.28
A2P011: Biomass_elnonononononono
A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: PVT_elnoyesnonononono
A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.28
A2P011: Othernonononononono
A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P012: Geothermalyesnononoyesyesyes
A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Solar Thermalnononoyesyesyesno
A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_heatnonononoyesnono
A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Waste heat+HPnonononoyesyesno
A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: PVT_thnoyesnonoyesnono
A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Othernoyesnonononono
A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes*Annual energy use below is presentedin primary energy consumptionGeothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centersGroundwater (used for heat pumps)
A2P014: Annual energy use
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]0.1943.9760.819016
A2P015: Annual energy delivered
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]0.0368
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0-1
A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P017: Gasnonoyesyesnonono
A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Coalnonononononono
A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Oilnononoyesnonono
A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Othernonononononono
A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P018: PVnononoyesnoyesno
A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Windnononoyesnoyesno
A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Hydronononononoyesno
A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_elnononoyesnonono
A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnononoyesnonono
A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: PVT_elnononoyesnonono
A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Othernonononononono
A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P019: Geothermalnononoyesnonono
A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Solar Thermalnononononoyesno
A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_heatnononoyesnoyesno
A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Waste heat+HPnononoyesnoyesno
A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Othernonononononono
A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary0000000
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]-0.000430.036
A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
A2P022: Safety & SecurityPersonal Safety
A2P022: HealthHealthy communityCO2) levels, Predicted Mean Vote,Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied, Temperature, Relative Humidity, Illuminance, Daylight factor, Sound pressure levels
A2P022: Education
A2P022: MobilitySustainable mobilityx
A2P022: EnergyNOn-renewable primary energy balance, renewable energy ratio, grid purchase factor, load cover factor/self-generation, supply cover factor/self-consumption, net energy/net power, peak delivered/peak expoted, total greenhouse gas emissionEnergyxNon-renewable primary energy balance, Renewable energy ratio, Grid Purchase factor, Load cover factor/Self-generation, Supply cover factor/Self-consumption, Net energy/Net power, Peak delivered/exported power, Connection capacity credit, Total greenhouse gas emissions
A2P022: Waterx
A2P022: Economic developmentcapital costs, operational cots, overall economic performance (5 KPIs)xInvestment costs, Share of investments covered by grants, Maintenance-related costs, Requirement-related costs, Operation-related costs, Other costs, Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return, Economic Value Added, Payback Period, nZEB Cost Comparison
A2P022: Housing and Communitydemographic composition, diverse community, social cohesionxAccess to services, Affordability of energy, Affordability of housing, Democratic legitimacy, Living conditions, Social cohesion, Personal safety, Energy consciousness
A2P022: Waste
A2P022: OtherSmartness and flecibility, Indoor Environmental Quality, Social performance - Equity (affordable housing, access to servicees and amenitioes, afforability of energy, living conditions, sustinable mobility, universal design)
A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnoyesnonoyesnono
A2P023: Wind Turbinesnonononononono
A2P023: Geothermal energy systemyesnonoyesyesnoyes
A2P023: Waste heat recoverynonononoyesyesno
A2P023: Waste to energynonononoyesnono
A2P023: Polygenerationnonononononono
A2P023: Co-generationnonononononono
A2P023: Heat Pumpyesyesyesyesyesyesno
A2P023: Hydrogennonononononono
A2P023: Hydropower plantnoyesnonononono
A2P023: Biomassnonononononono
A2P023: Biogasnonononononono
A2P023: Other
A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)noyesnoyesyesyesno
A2P024: Energy management systemyesyesnoyesyesnoyes
A2P024: Demand-side managementyesyesnonononoyes
A2P024: Smart electricity gridnonononononoyes
A2P024: Thermal Storagenononoyesyesyesno
A2P024: Electric Storagenononoyesyesnono
A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnononoyesyesyesno
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsyesnonoyesyesnono
A2P024: P2P – buildingsnoyesnonononoyes
A2P024: Other
A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnoyesyesyesnonono
A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnoyesnonoyesnono
A2P025: High-performance new buildingsyesnononoyesyesyes
A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)nonononoyesyesno
A2P025: Urban data platformsnoyesnoyesyesnono
A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnononononoyesno
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)yesnoyesnononoyes
A2P025: Smart irrigationnononononoyesno
A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonononononono
A2P025: Smart surveillancenonononononono
A2P025: Other
A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)noyesnononoyesno
A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)nononononoyesyes
A2P026: e-Mobilitynoyesnoyesyesyesyes
A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnoyesnoyesnoyesno
A2P026: Car-free areanononononoyesno
A2P026: Other
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes- Multimodal mobility nodes - Support of public transport tickets - Mobility consulting - District managementShared mobility: a mobility point will be implemented and ensure the flexible use of different mobility services.
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesYesNoYesYesYesYes
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEPC = 0, energy neutral buildingEnergy Performance Certificate - in Spain it is mandatory in order to buy or rent a house or a dwelling)Energy Performance CertificateEnergieausweis mandatory if buildings/ flats/ apartments are soldEnergy Performance Certificate
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoNoYesYes
A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesKlimaaktiv standard  Voluntary! Certification can be for buildings and/or quarters. The different quarters are built in different standards. Ranging from bronze/silver/goldKlimaaktiv certificate, Greenpass certificate
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
  • Smart cities strategies,
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.)
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • New development strategies,
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Smart cities strategies,
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyCity wide climate neutrality by 2035, city administration climate neutrality by 2030City level targets Klimaschutzplan Graz - 2022 | Targets: - Climate neutrality until 2040 - Social justice and high quality of life - High innovation levels Mobilitätsplan Graz 2040 – under development | Targets: - Modal Split 80:20 until 2040 80% Public transport, bike, walking | 20% cars Kommunales Energiekonzept (2017) | Targets: - Increase of district heating Energiemasterplan Graz (2018) | Targets: - Energy efficiency of urban dwellings and infrastructures - District heating and solar energy - Energy efficiency of private dwellings - Climate conscious mobility National level targets Klimaschutzplan Österreich -draft, expected by 2024 | Targets: - Decarbonisation (reduction of GHG, renewable energies, - Climate neutrality until 2040 - Energy efficiency - Security of energy supply
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
  • Electrification of Cooking Methods,
  • Biogas
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
  • Electrification of Cooking Methods,
  • Biogas
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
A3P003: Other
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesAccording to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary with heat pumps. Rooftop photovoltaic panels also have the potential for renewable energy generation. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity through this scenario.Reininghaus needs green spaces and places Sector coupling of water, waste water, electricity ICT and demand side management Mobility - Reininghaus needs better infrastructure for bikes and pedestrians - Public transportation should be more affordable and Sharing should be implemented in the district Infrastructure should cover daily needs within walking distance Infrastructure for local jobs and shared offices
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
A3P005: Sustainable behaviourIn Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed.- citizen participation and promotion of functioning neighbourhoods (e.g., through city district management) As of today, solutions for the energy transition in the residential sector have focused on the construction of energy-efficient buildings and on the energy-efficient refurbishment of existing buildings. Measures to influence user behaviour and to directly address residents and neighbourhoods as actors of the energy transition play a minor role and are also not formalized. At the same time, moving into a new apartment offers a ‘window of opportunity’ to establish new everyday practices and behaviour. In already inhabited housing developments, well-functioning neighbourhoods or existing, ‘sustainability pioneers’ are key to motivating people to adopt more resource-efficient lifestyles. In order to prepare such agents of change towards more climate protection and sustainability in the context of housing, Austria launched the BAREWO project. The aim is to develop a kit of formats, methods, and interventions for resource-efficient housing. This toolkit will be tested in six testbeds, among which quarter 12 (Q12) of Graz- Reininghaus, as soon as first residents move in (approx. 2024). Austrian TRANS-PED partner StadtLABOR, which is also a partner in the BAREWO project, will support Q12 in this process. In parallel, a monitoring system will be developed to make the (climate) effects of the kit measurable. In addition, a guideline for property managers will be developed, which will serve as an orientation for them on how their residents can be coached in matters of climate protection and sustainability in everyday (residential) life. From the very beginning, (communication) measures are implemented and relevant stakeholders are involved in the project (project advisory board) to ensure the multiplicability, financing and broad application of the toolkit. If successful, the toolkit could also be scaled up to other quarters in Reininghaus.
A3P006: Economic strategies
A3P006: Economic strategies
  • Open data business models
  • Innovative business models,
  • Blockchain
  • PPP models,
  • Local trading
  • Innovative business models,
  • Local trading
A3P006: Other
A3P007: Social models
A3P007: Social models
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Social incentives,
  • Quality of Life
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
  • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Affordability
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
  • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Citizen Social Research,
  • Prevention of energy poverty,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
  • Social incentives,
  • Quality of Life,
  • Affordability,
  • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
  • Social incentives,
  • Quality of Life,
  • Strategies towards social mix,
  • Affordability,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
A3P007: Other
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
  • Strategic urban planning,
  • City Vision 2050,
  • SECAP Updates
  • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
  • District Energy plans
  • Strategic urban planning,
  • District Energy plans,
  • City Vision 2050,
  • SECAP Updates
  • Strategic urban planning,
  • City Vision 2050,
  • Building / district Certification
  • Building / district Certification
A3P008: Other
A3P009: Environmental strategies
A3P009: Environmental strategies
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone
  • Energy Neutral
  • Pollutants Reduction,
  • Greening strategies,
  • Sustainable Urban drainage systems (SUDS),
  • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone
A3P009: OtherEnergy Positive, Low Emission Zone
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsdecision by the Munich City Council in 2019 to become climate neutral by 2030 / 2035At national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen:  Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation.  Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries.  The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals.  Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricityMobility contracts: A mobility contract is concluded between the City of Graz and the property developers in the course of development plans and serves to reduce the motor vehicle traffic to be expected as a result of the construction project. Push & pull measures are agreed: With a lower car parking space key, which is significantly lower than today's usual requirements, offers and information for easier use of public transport, walking and cycling, as well as car sharing and e-mobility are simultaneously created by the property developers, leading to a win-win-win situation for all parties involved. Basic principles - Possibility of combining effective "push & pull" measures => control option (e.g. reduction of car parking spaces, but optimisation of accessibility to public transport and walking and cycling networks, public transport tickets, mobility information, ... etc.) - Changing mobility behaviour in favour of sustainable forms of transport from the moment the flat is handed over ("upheaval" in personal mobility behaviour when changing the residential location) - Reduction in construction and maintenance costs (underground car parks, public road infrastructure) - Easier realisation of larger construction projects in the inner city area with lower generation of vehicle demand Städtebauliche Verträge in Graz / Urban development contracts in Graz Qualitative urban (neighbourhood) development with added value for all stakeholders: urban development contracts are modern instruments in the development of cities and neighbourhoods. As one of the pioneers in this field, the City of Graz also increasingly favours this form of quality assurance. Urban development contracts are a contractual form of regulation between the City of Graz and landowners, which enables flexible control of urban (sub)development in the interests of the common interests while at the same time relieving the public authorities. The contracts make property-related stipulations in accordance with urban planning requirements (e.g. urban development concept, development concept, framework plan, zoning plan) and the specialist planning requirements in particular infrastructure, development, design and mobility. This is intended to infrastructure, services of general interest, building land quality and settlement development required for the (parts of the) city.
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionThe demonstration projects is a new residential development, which consists of an apartment complex which includes 39 apartments spread over 3 floors. It is a sustainble plus energy neighbouhood, and has reached a plus energy balance on its first year in operation. It has MPC controls on the individual heat pumps to improve the energy flexibility of the apartments. It includes the "social beatiful" concepts with a strong emphasis on the social sustainability of the project.Çamlık District, unlike many other districts in Ankara, has a specific urban morphology that draws near the other pilot zones considered by the partners of PED-ACT. The site has three-storey single housing units, along with a fair amount of greenery around. Furthermore, the roof areas enable large amounts of PV installment, which results in higher amounts of local renewable energy potential. Therefore, the district is a good fit for PED development.Munich as demonstrator together with Lyon in ASCEND projectReininghaus addresses some relevant key aspects listed in the JPI UE PED Framework Definition such as: - high level of aspiration in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production; - integration of different systems and infrastructures; - inclusion of aspects not only related to energy sector, but also connected with social, economic and environmental sustainability.
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentThe need for social housing and the ambition to create a great living environment with a high-performance apartment complex, supplied with renewable energy. It results in lower energy bills for the tenants and high-quality homes.PED-ACT project.speed and scale of PEDsThe Reininghausgründe is a new quarter near the centre of the City of Graz. On the area of a former brewery, close to more, still working industries, a new town centre is being established. The quarter will include living areas, workplaces, shops, schools and a park, so that the need for individual mobility is minimized. It is connected to the historical city centre by bike paths, busses and a tram. Car sharing is provided as well.
B1P003: Environment of the case study area
B2P003: Environment of the case study areaSuburban areaUrban areaSuburban areaUrban areaUrban areaSuburban area
B1P004: Type of district
B2P004: Type of district
  • New construction
  • New construction,
  • Renovation
  • Renovation
  • Renovation
  • New construction
  • New construction
B1P005: Case Study Context
B1P005: Case Study Context
  • New Development
  • Re-use / Transformation Area,
  • Retrofitting Area,
  • Preservation Area
  • Retrofitting Area
  • Retrofitting Area
  • New Development
  • New Development
B1P006: Year of construction
B1P006: Year of construction198620252024
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential60
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential610000
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential0
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P011: Population density before intervention
B1P011: Population density before intervention0000000
B1P012: Population density after intervention
B1P012: Population density after intervention0000.01071428571428600.010
B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
B1P013: Residentialnoyesyesyesnonono
B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]50800
B1P013: Officenonononononono
B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Industry and Utilitynononononoyesno
B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Commercialnonononononono
B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Institutionalnonononononono
B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Natural areasnononononoyesyes
B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Recreationalnonononononono
B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Dismissed areasnonononononono
B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Othernoyesnonononono
B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
B1P014: Residentialyesyesyesyesnoyesyes
B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]239450800
B1P014: Officenononononoyesno
B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Commercialnononononoyesno
B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Institutionalnononononoyesno
B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Natural areasnononononoyesyes
B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Recreationalnononononoyesno
B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononononono
B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Othernoyesnonononono
B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionGroningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city.
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P002: Installation life timeThe MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact.
B2P003: Scale of action
B2P003: ScaleDistrict
B2P004: Operator of the installation
B2P004: Operator of the installationThe Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties.
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materialsGroningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materials
B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?No
B2P006: Other
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
  • Civic
B2P007: Other
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipality
B2P008: Other
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
  • Academia,
  • Private,
  • Industrial,
  • Other
B2P009: Otherresearch companies, monitoring company, ict company
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
  • Buildings,
  • Demand-side management,
  • Energy storage,
  • Energy networks,
  • Waste management,
  • Lighting,
  • E-mobility,
  • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
  • Social interactions,
  • Business models
B2P011: Other
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
  • Tools for prototyping and modelling
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P014: Monitoring measures
  • Execution plan,
  • Available data,
  • Type of measured data,
  • Equipment,
  • Level of access
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
  • Energy,
  • Social,
  • Economical / Financial
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P017: Capacities
B2P017: Capacities
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P019: Available tools
B2P019: Available tools
  • Energy modelling,
  • Social models,
  • Business and financial models
B2P019: Available tools
B2P020: External accessibility
B2P020: External accessibility
C1P001: Unlocking Factors
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
C1P002: Driving Factors
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Economic growth need1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)Earthquakes due to gas extraction
C1P003: Administrative barriers
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)Delay in the Environmental Dialogue processing in the municipality
C1P004: Policy barriers
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Regulatory instability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Non-effective regulations1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P006: Environmental barriers- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Water Scarcity: 1 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1
C1P007: Technical barriers
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Deficient planning1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
C1P008: Inertia1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Rebound effect1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
C1P010: Financial barriers
C1P010: Hidden costs1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
C1P011: Market barriers
C1P011: Split incentives1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Energy price distortion1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
C1P012: Stakeholders involved
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • None
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Research & Innovation
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • None
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Financial/Funding
  • None
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Business process management
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Planning/leading
  • None
C1P012: Urban Services providers
  • Planning/leading
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Real Estate developers
  • Planning/leading,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading
  • Construction/implementation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Design/Construction companies
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Construction/implementation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • None
  • None
  • Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
  • Planning/leading
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Other
  • None
C1P012: Other (if any)
Summary

Authors (framework concept)

Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

Contributors (to the content)

Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

Implemented by

Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)