Filters:
NameProjectTypeCompare
Örebro-Vivalla JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Texel JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hällefors, Sweden JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Uncompare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Uncompare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Uncompare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Uncompare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleUden, Loopkantstraat
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district
Findhorn, the Park
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabUden, LoopkantstraatBarcelona, Santa Coloma de GramenetBologna, Pilastro-Roveri districtFindhorn, the ParkIstanbul, Ozyegin University CampusLubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMATIzmir, District of Karşıyaka
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynoyesnoyesnonoyes
PED relevant case studyyesnoyesnoyesnono
PED Lab.nononononoyesno
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesyesyesyesnoyes
Annual energy surplusyesyesnoyesnonoyes
Energy communitynonoyesyesnonono
Circularitynononoyesnonono
Air quality and urban comfortnoyesnonoyesyesyes
Electrificationyesnonoyesyesnono
Net-zero energy costnonononononoyes
Net-zero emissionnononoyesnoyesno
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nononononoyesno
Maximise self-sufficiencynononoyesnonoyes
Othernonononoyesnono
Other (A1P004)almost nZEB district
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabIn operationImplementation PhasePlanning PhaseIn operationImplementation PhaseImplementation PhasePlanning Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date06/1709/1901/6210/2411/1910/22
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date05/2310/2310/2812/2310/25
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data
  • General statistical datasets
  • General statistical datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
A1P009: OtherOther
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
  • Inger Andresen, Tonje Healey Trulsrud, Luca Finocchiaro, Alessandro Nocente, Meril Tamm, Joana Ortiz, Jaume Salom, Abel Magyari, Linda Hoes-van Oeffelen, Wouter Borsboom, Wim Kornaat, Niki Gaitani, Design and performance predictions of plus energy neighbourhoods – Case studies of demonstration projects in four different European climates, Energy and Buildings, Volume 274, 2022, 112447, ISSN 0378-7788, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112447. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778822006181),
  • Deliverable, Report: Integrated Energy Design for Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods (syn.ikia),
  • Deliverable, Report: DEMONSTRATION CASE OF SUSTAINABLE PLUS ENERGY NEIGHBOURHOODS IN MARINE CLIMATE (syn.ikia),
  • https://www.synikia.eu/no/bibliotek/
  • Boeri, A., Boulanger, S., Turci, G., Pagliula, S. (2021) Strategie e tecnologie abilitanti per PED misti: efficienza tra smart cities e industria 4.0. TECHNE, 22, 180-190,
  • Barroco Fontes Cunha F., Carani C., Nucci C.A., Castro C., Santana Silva M., Andrade Torres E. (2021) Transitioning to a low carbon society through energy communities: Lessons learned from Brazil and Italy, ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2021, 75, 1-19.,
  • GRETA Project, Pilastro-Roveri case study. Available at: https://projectgreta.eu/case-study/renewable-energy-district/
      • http://www.ceder.es/redes-inteligentes,
      • O. Izquierdo-Monge, Paula Peña-Carro et al. Conversion of a network section with loads, storage systems and renewable generation sources into a smart microgrid. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(11), 5012. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115012,
      • O. Izquierdo-Monge, Paula Peña-Carro et al. A Methodology for the Conversion of a Network Section with Generation Sources, Storage and Loads into an Electrical Microgrid Based on Raspberry Pi and Home Assistant. ICSC-Cities 2020, CCIS 1359 proceedings. Springer. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69136-3_1
      A1P011: Geographic coordinates
      X Coordinate (longitude):5.61912.1611.397323-3.609929.258300-2.50827.110049
      Y Coordinate (latitude):51.660641.3944.50710657.653041.03060041.60338.496054
      A1P012: Country
      A1P012: CountryNetherlandsSpainItalyUnited KingdomTurkeySpainTurkey
      A1P013: City
      A1P013: CityUdenBarcelonaBolognaFindhornIstanbulLubia - Soriaİzmir
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CfbCsaCfaDwcCfaCfbCsa
      A1P015: District boundary
      A1P015: District boundaryGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographic
      Other
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:PrivatePrivateMixedMixedPrivatePublicPrivate
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Single OwnerSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerSingle OwnerMultiple Owners
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED116196216015621
      A1P019: Conditioned space
      A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]236021542102795
      A1P020: Total ground area
      A1P020: Total ground area [m²]38607800000180000285.400640000032600
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area1000003
      A1P022: Financial schemes
      A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estateyesnonoyesyesnono
      A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]7804440
      A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
      A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernonononononono
      A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononononono
      A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnonoyesyesnonono
      A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonoyesnononono
      A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnonoyesnononono
      A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononono
      A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnoyesyesyesyesnoyes
      A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]5039031193355
      A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnononononoyesyes
      A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonoyesnonoyesno
      A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononono
      A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022: Other
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      • Positive externalities
      • Job creation,
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local businesses
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production,
      • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
      • Boosting local and sustainable production,
      • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      A1P023: Other
      A1P024: More comments:
      A1P024: More comments:The project is a follow-up from the “Social Beautiful” concept which was developed in collaboration between Labyrint (Support in sheltered housing), Area (housing company), the municipality of Uden, and Hendriks Coppelmans (developer). The concept aims to provide an answer to changes in various policy areas and the changing demands of society. The Social Beautiful concept consists of the following elements: 1. Living, working, and community services are brought together in one location. A multifunctional residential and service centre is being realized at the location. 2. Housing is shaped by the realization of financially accessible homes suitable for the target group. The housing design is tailored to the target group. it may also include sheltered / protected living. 3. Work takes place at the location or from the same location. The work has a social function within the neighbourhood. Wage-related work must contribute to providing structure in the daily activities of the residents. 4. Neighbourhood management is organized from the location in the surrounding neighbourhood. A service package is provided from the residential and service centre that contributes to the ability of neighbourhood residents to live independently for longer, to strengthen the social network, and to improve the quality of life and safety in the neighbourhood. 5. The houses are suitable for use at all times for regular rental. Communal facilities must be realized within the contours of a regular apartment. The objective is to offer a suitable living and working situation to a group of vulnerable citizens. In this way they become a fully-fledged part of society. They not only make use of the facilities themselves, but also give substance to the level of facilities in the municipality. Due to the integrated approach, they experience a greater sense of well-being and security.The Pilastro-Roveri area is a large peri-urban district in the northeast of the city of Bologna (about 650 hectares). In particular, the northern area is mainly characterised by the residential sector of Rione Pilastro, a significant complex of social housing built in the 1960s in response to the housing emergency due to migrations from southern Italy and nowadays satisfying more global migrations. The southern area is instead characterised by the presence of the production district called Roveri. The area appears relevant for the research as it has several evolution potentials towards a climate-neutral district. In particular some key factors are interesting: - the presence of one of the largest photovoltaic parks in Europe on the roofs of CAAB, characterised by a production of 11,350,000 Kw/h of primary energy; - the presence of companies attentive to the issues of climate change and energy, able to act as facilitators for the area. This is the case of FIVE, a leader in the production of electric bicycles, whose plant is the first nZEB (nearly Zero Energy Building) productive building in the city; - the high presence of industrial buildings of different sizes needing a reduction in energy consumption; - the presence of obsolete, sometimes in decay, and of general highly energy-intensive buildings in the Pilastro area, accompanied by spread phenomena of energy poverty; - the presence of spaces that could be converted (e.g. unused warehouses, unexploited green areas, etc.); - the presence of an active community, characterised by numerous associations, but also by social challenges linked to multiple vulnerabilities; - the presence of local actors interested in the development of the area (including the Municipality, the University, Confindustria, ENEA, Confartigianato, etc.). Two main research projects are actually ongoing in the area, applying solutions towards energy improvement and transition strategies to guide the area towards climate neutrality: - GECO - Green Energy Community, funded by EIT Climate-KIC and active since 2019, aims to trigger a virtuous path of energy sharing between companies and citizens through the creation of an energy community. - GRETA - Green Energy Transition Actions, funded by the H2020 programme, aims to understand drivers and barriers on the involvement of citizens in the energy transition processes, by formulating Community Transition Pathways and Energy Citizenship Contracts. [from: Boeri, A., Boulanger, S., Turci, G., Pagliula, S. (2021) Strategie e tecnologie abilitanti per PED misti: efficienza tra smart cities e industria 4.0. TECHNE, 22, 180-190]In addition to having the most energy efficient academic building in Turkey, the university campus also has 3 buildings with LEED NC Campus certificate and LEED BD+C Gold certificate. In addition, it aims to continuously improve the energy efficiency objectives on campus in an innovative way. For this purpose, energy management and storage systems are being installed in the Dormitory 6 building, which is used as the demo area of the LEGOFIT project, for the purpose of turning it into a PED project.The Centre for the Development of Renewable Energy (CEDER)is specialized in applied research, development and promotion of renewable energy. Among the facilities of this Centre, the urban laboratory CEDER-CIEMAT assess the performance of different configurations of energy networks at the district level. This PED-Lab infrastructure is an energy district that connects six office buildings with energy generation installations by means of two energy rings: electrical grid (in operation phase) and thermal network (in the implementation phase). The buildings of this PED Lab can act as energy demanders or suppliers depending on the climatic and operational conditions. The majority of these buildings are constructed with conventional technologies but some of them are implemented with efficient and sustainable measures. The thermal network is composed by two biomass boilers, 300 kW power each, and water tanks with 90 kWh of thermal storage. This network will shortly be expanded with a low temperature (90°C) and high temperature (150°-250°C) rings. The low-temperature ring is made up by two Stirling engine cogeneration boilers (one biomass gasification boiler and one gas boiler). The high-temperature ring has a thermal generator made up of Fresnel solar concentrators and an ORC cogeneration system fed directly from the solar concentrator. The high-temperature ring is interconnected with the low-temperature ring through an oil/water heat exchanger. This network has thermal storage systems in the modalities of: aquifers, boreholes, phase change materials, cold storage with geothermal exchange ground recovery and thermal storage at very low temperature with zeolites. The electrical grid incorporates different renewable generation technologies (50 kW wind turbine and eight different photovoltaic systems, a reversible hydraulic system), and engine generator of 100 kVA, electricity storages (batteries) and flexible loads.
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]78044401
      Contact person for general enquiries
      A1P026: NameTonje Healey TrulsrudJaume SalomProf. Danila LongoStefano NebioloCem KeskinDr. Raquel RamosOzlem Senyol
      A1P027: OrganizationNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)IRECUniversity of Bologna - Architecture DepartmentFindhorn Innovation Research and Education CICCenter for Energy, Environment and Economy, Ozyegin UniversityCentre for the Development of Renewable Energy (CEDER) - Centre for Energy, Environment and Technology Research (CIEMAT)Karsiyaka Municipality
      A1P028: AffiliationResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public Bodies
      A1P028: Other
      A1P029: Emailtonje.h.trulsrud@ntnu.nojsalom@irec.catstefanonebiolo@gmail.comcem.keskin@ozyegin.edu.trraquel.ramos@ciemat.esozlemkocaer2@gmail.com
      Contact person for other special topics
      A1P030: NameJoan Estrada AliberasM. Pınar MengüçDr. Oscar SecoHasan Burak Cavka
      A1P031: Emailj_estrada@gencat.catpinar.menguc@ozyegin.edu.troscar.seco@ciemat.eshasancavka@iyte.edu.tr
      Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
      A2P001: Fields of application
      A2P001: Fields of application
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • Waste management,
      • Indoor air quality,
      • Construction materials
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • Digital technologies
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies,
      • Waste management
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Waste management
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies,
      • Waste management,
      • Indoor air quality,
      • Construction materials
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • Digital technologies,
      • Indoor air quality
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.)
      A2P001: Other
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: Energy efficient envelope, with good insulation, triple glazing windows and airtight envelope. (EPC = 0) Energy Flexibility: MCP controls for the heat pump in the apartments. Energy production: PV panels on the roof, Ground source heat pumps Waste management: construction waste was kept to a minimum and sorted and collected separately as much as possible. Indoor air quality: Exhaust ventilation and opening of windows Construction materials: low carbon emission building materials- Integrated energy design process of both active and passive elements - Multicriteria analysis of energy system, environmental variables, indoor comfort and economic parameters - Energy modelling - Predictive control to optimize performance within the neighbourhoodEnergy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax incentives (110%, façade bonus, eco-bonus, sismabonus, renovation bonus, etc.); - several activities - such as Workshops, Webinars, Roundtables, Urban Trekking, etc…- are encouraged in the area to deepen knowledge and raise awareness on energy issues among urban stakeholders (householders, occupants, workers, etc..); - reduction in energy consumption also through every day energy saving actions. The spread of energy poverty phenomena in the area is considered urgent both for the medium-low-income population living in Pilastro and for small and medium-sized enterprises placed in Roveri; - Project for a One-stop-shop to guide residents and enterprises towards more conscious energy behaviours (planned in Bologna SECAP). Energy production: - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a waste to energy plant connected to the district heating system; - presence of a large PV plant in the CAAB area - 11,350,000 Kw/h Energy flexibility: - testing energy community and collective self-consumption feasibility in Pilastro area through an active citizens involvement process; - testing energy community feasibility among SMEs in Roveri industrial area; - testing the potential of complementary energy consumption profiles between residential area (Pilastro) and industrial area (Roveri). Digital technologies: - smart-meters installation in some dwellings in order to monitor consumption and suggest more sustainable energy behaviors; - Blog Pilastro as a tool to inform about the main activities and events ongoing in the area; E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; - e-bike/bikesharing services recovery (in fact during Covid-19 in the area Mobike service was suspended) and implementation. Urban comfort and air quality - Control units for air pollutants concentration (PM2.5, PM10, NO2); - Microclimatic simulationLEED NC Campus + LEGOFIT Project Energy Efficiency: Tri- generation, Compliance with ISO 50001, ASHRAE 90.1, energy efficient appliances, HVAC and lighting Energy flexibility: Energy demand management Energy production: Solar PVs Onsite + (to be installed more) E-mobility: EV Charging stations Indoor Air Quality: Energy Management System, Compliance with ASHRAE 62.1, ASHRAE 55 Construction materials: Passive systems, LEED certified buildings, innovative materials such as PCM Waste Management: Zero waste documentEnergy efficiency: - Buildings energy retrofit. Energy production: - Biomass Boiler capacity: 0.6 MW. Annual production: 1.2 GWh - Solar thermal collectors: 70 kW, planned extended to: 0.47MW - Geotermal & Absorption Pumps: 100 kW - Share of renewables after extension: 100% (30% solar thermal and 70% biomass) - AOC 50kW wind turbine. Awaiting installation of a two-way AC-AC converter for subsequent connection to the grid - Bornay Inclin 3 kW wind turbine, connected to 24 Vdc batteries, to be connected to the grid by means of Xantrex inverter/charger - 9kW photovoltaic park (66PV panels, brand BP Solar,type BP5140,of 140W) connected to the grid by means of two INGECON SUN 5 inverters - 5kW photovoltaic pergola (24PV panels, brand Solon, type P200, of 210W) connected to the grid by means of one INGECON SUN 5 inverter - 8.28kW photovoltaic roof (36PV panels, Brand LDK, type LDK-230P-20), connected to the grid by means of one INGECONSUN 10 inverter - 12kW photovoltaic roof (80PV panels, brand Gamesa, type GS-1501), connected to the grid. - Reversible hydraulic system connected to a 60 kW electric generator and a pumping system. -Stirling engine with a heat lamp based on natural gas, a helium cool lamp, 10kWe maximum power delivered and global performance of approximately 33%. Energy flexibility: - Thermal storage systems: water tanks 90kW, aquifers, boreholes, phase change materials, cold storage with geothermal exchange ground recovery and thermal storage at very low temperature with zeolites. - Electrical storage systems: batteries (lead-acid and lithium-ion). - Flexible loads. Control systems and Digital technologies: - Full monitoring campaign. - Smart-meters installation to monitor consumption and suggest another energy behaviours. - Dynamic simulation tools to optimize the energy performance. Urban comfort and air quality: - Meteorological stations to monitor the climate evolution. - Microclimatic simulation tools to quantify the thermal behaviour.Methods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4). In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED.
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000YesYesYesNoYes
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNoYesYesYes
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNoNoNoNo
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationnot includedNot included, the campus is a non car area except emergenciesMobility is not included in the calculations.
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]0.1483.862
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.1091.21.226
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P011: PVyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
      A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.0580.051.028
      A2P011: Windnononoyesnoyesno
      A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Hydronononononoyesno
      A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_elnononononoyesno
      A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: PVT_elnonononononono
      A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Othernoyesnonononono
      A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P012: Geothermalyesnonononoyesno
      A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Solar Thermalnonoyesyesnoyesno
      A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_heatnonoyesyesnoyesno
      A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Waste heat+HPnononoyesnoyesno
      A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: PVT_thnonononononono
      A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnononoyesnoyesno
      A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Othernonononononono
      A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes*Annual energy use below is presentedin primary energy consumption-Rooftop PV 39.1 kWp -4 pipe air-to-water heat pump to cover heating and cooling3x225 kW wind turbines + 100 kW PV
      A2P014: Annual energy use
      A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]0.1940.0331.23.55.088
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]0.03680.0301.2
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]00
      A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P017: Gasnonononononoyes
      A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Coalnonononononono
      A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Oilnonononononono
      A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Othernonononononono
      A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P018: PVnonononoyesnoyes
      A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.000455470.707
      A2P018: Windnonononononono
      A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Hydrononononononono
      A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_elnonononononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
      A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Othernonononononono
      A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
      A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
      A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_heatnonononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
      A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
      A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Othernonononononono
      A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary0000001.4540311173975
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]-0.00043
      A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
      A2P022: Safety & SecurityPersonal Safety
      A2P022: HealthHealthy communityCarbon Dioxide (CO2) levels, Predicted Mean Vote,Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied, Temperature, Relative Humidity, Illuminance, Daylight factor, Sound pressure levels
      A2P022: Education
      A2P022: MobilitySustainable mobility
      A2P022: EnergyNOn-renewable primary energy balance, renewable energy ratio, grid purchase factor, load cover factor/self-generation, supply cover factor/self-consumption, net energy/net power, peak delivered/peak expoted, total greenhouse gas emissionNon-renewable primary energy balance, Renewable energy ratio, Grid Purchase factor, Load cover factor/Self-generation, Supply cover factor/Self-consumption, Net energy/Net power, Peak delivered/exported power, Connection capacity credit, Total greenhouse gas emissions
      A2P022: Water
      A2P022: Economic developmentcapital costs, operational cots, overall economic performance (5 KPIs): Investment costs, Share of investments covered by grants, Maintenance-related costs, Requirement-related costs, Operation-related costs, Other costs, Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return, Economic Value Added, Payback Period, nZEB Cost Comparison
      A2P022: Housing and Communitydemographic composition, diverse community, social cohesion: Access to services, Affordability of energy, Affordability of housing, Democratic legitimacy, Living conditions, Social cohesion, Personal safety, Energy consciousness
      A2P022: Waste
      A2P022: OtherSmartness and flecibility, Indoor Environmental Quality, Social performance - Equity (affordable housing, access to servicees and amenitioes, afforability of energy, living conditions, sustinable mobility, universal design)
      A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
      A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
      A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnonoyesyesnoyesno
      A2P023: Wind Turbinesnononoyesyesyesno
      A2P023: Geothermal energy systemyesnoyesnonoyesno
      A2P023: Waste heat recoverynononoyesnoyesno
      A2P023: Waste to energynonoyesnononono
      A2P023: Polygenerationnononononoyesno
      A2P023: Co-generationnonoyesnoyesyesno
      A2P023: Heat Pumpyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
      A2P023: Hydrogennononononoyesno
      A2P023: Hydropower plantnononononoyesno
      A2P023: Biomassnononoyesnoyesno
      A2P023: Biogasnonononononono
      A2P023: Other
      A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
      A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)nonoyesnoyesyesno
      A2P024: Energy management systemyesyesnoyesyesyesno
      A2P024: Demand-side managementyesyesnonoyesyesno
      A2P024: Smart electricity gridnononononoyesno
      A2P024: Thermal Storagenononoyesnoyesno
      A2P024: Electric Storagenonoyesyesyesyesno
      A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnonoyesyesyesyesno
      A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsyesnononoyesyesno
      A2P024: P2P – buildingsnonononononono
      A2P024: Other
      A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
      A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnonoyesnonoyesyes
      A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnonononononono
      A2P025: High-performance new buildingsyesyesyesyesyesnono
      A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)nonoyesnononono
      A2P025: Urban data platformsnonononononono
      A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnonoyesnononono
      A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)yesyesyesnoyesyesyes
      A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononoyesnono
      A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonoyesnononono
      A2P025: Smart surveillancenonoyesnoyesnono
      A2P025: Other
      A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
      A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nonoyesnononono
      A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)nonoyesnononono
      A2P026: e-Mobilitynonoyesyesyesnono
      A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnonoyesnoyesnono
      A2P026: Car-free areanonononoyesyesno
      A2P026: Other
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesYesYesYesYesNo
      A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEPC = 0, energy neutral buildingEnergy Performance CertificateEnergy Performance Certificate for each dwellingIn Spain it is mandatory the Energy Performance Certificate in order to buy or rent a house or a dwelling
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoNoYesNoNo
      A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesLEED BD+C, LEED NC CAMPUS
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      • Urban Renewal Strategies,
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Smart cities strategies,
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Smart cities strategies,
      • New development strategies,
      • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyCity level targets Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (PUMS) - 2019 | Targets: - by 2030 440,000 daily trips will no longer be made by car but on foot, by bike or by public transport; - by 2030 12% of vehicles will be electric; Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP) - 2021 | Targets: - by 2025 deep renovation of 3% per year of residential homes (insulation of building envelopes and adoption of heat pump heating system); - by 2030 reduction of electricity consumption at least of 20% compared to 2018; - by 2030 100% coverage of electricity consumption for municipal buildings; - by 2030 increase public green areas by at least 10% Urban General Plan (PUG) - 2021 | Targets: - by 2030 net zero land consumption; National level targets Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan - 2020 | Targets: - by 2030 reduction of 43% for primary energy consumption, with respect to the reference 2007 scenario. - by 2030 increase of 30% of energy production from renewable sources; - by 2025 energy generation for electricity independent from the use of coal;- Testing the combination of renewable technologies at district level. - Optimization of the generation side based on the weather forecasting and demand side. - Optimization of the control system, connected to the central node, to design and perform virtual analyses based on the combination of all the systems and infrastructures. - Optimization of ICT systems. - Design and management of a virtual analysis - Optimization of efficient measures: building performance, user´s behaviour… - Combination of flexible storage systems to operate the global installation.Karşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030. System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023.
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
      • Electrification of Cooking Methods
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
      • Electrification of Cooking Methods
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
      • Biogas,
      • Hydrogen
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
      A3P003: OtherBoiler Automation, Energy Management System, Electric Battery Storage, Demand Management and Flexible Pricing
      A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
      A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesBologna needs to reach the climate neutrality proceeding by ‘part’ of the city. Pilastro-Roveri is a promising district due to the following reasons: - some buildings need to be renovated both to increase the energy performance, the seismic behaviour, spaces liveability and comfort; - Pilastro is a residential area with the presence of a high percentage of vulnerable inhabitants affected by energy poverty phenomenon. This situation needs to be prioritized; - Pilastro is characterized by the presence of large underused green spaces that can represent a valuable resource for social cohesion and for heat island phenomenon mitigation; - Roveri is an industrial area where some small-medium enterprises are investing in order to improve their facilities and to efficiency their production cycle; - Roveri and Pilastro areas present complementary energy consumption curves throughout the day/week with a high potential for energy sharing and flexibility.Carbon and Energy Neutrality- Create a thermal energy storage tank to be used for air conditioning the buildings. - Some buildings need to be renovated both to increase the energy performance, the seismic behaviour and spaces liveability and comfort. - Optimizing the coupling between technologies. - Guarantee the flexibility to operate the renewable installations to operate in different phases and with different configurations. - CEDER is a public research center and needs to have connected any energy system to the same grid. - CEDER has an industrial develop area where some experimental thermal storage system could be tested.According to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario.
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviourBologna SECAP, as well as the participation to the 100 Climate-Neutral Cities, promotes the PED model as an enabling tool to foster city energy transition process. In Pilastro-Roveri district two main sustainable behaviours approaches can be identified: - bottom-up approach - some citizens are joining forces to create groups of energy self-consumption, in view of energy communities’ implementation and, at the same time, some companies have already undertaken some efficiency intervention on the production system by leveraging highly energy-efficient technologies; - top-down approach - GECO and GRETA are international ongoing projects on the area that promote innovation and energy transition with important fundings from the European Union, but with a particular focus on citizen engagement and participatory approach. Simultaneously, new and updated planning tools such as PUG, SECAP and SUMP identify in this part of Bologna city a key area to enable an ecological transition process holding together all relevant stakeholders - citizens, small-medium enterprises and Institutions. These two thrusts (bottom-up and top-down) need to be optimized in view of a participatory pathway towards the grounding of a Positive Energy District in Pilastro-Roveri.Under LEGOFIT project, promoting sustainable behavior for better occupant experience is a targeted aim under a work package.- Minimize the building energy consumption while maintaining indoor comfort levels. - Onsite renewable production with flexible storage elements to fix demand side and generation side. - Flexible control solutions through digitalization systems.
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      • Innovative business models,
      • PPP models,
      • Circular economy models,
      • Demand management Living Lab,
      • Existing incentives
      • Demand management Living Lab
      A3P006: Other
      A3P007: Social models
      A3P007: Social models
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Social incentives,
      • Quality of Life
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
      • Citizen Social Research,
      • Policy Forums,
      • Affordability,
      • Prevention of energy poverty,
      • Digital Inclusion,
      • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
      • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Quality of Life
      • Digital Inclusion,
      • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Affordability
      A3P007: Other
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      • Strategic urban planning,
      • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
      • City Vision 2050,
      • SECAP Updates,
      • Building / district Certification
      • City Vision 2050,
      • SECAP Updates,
      • Building / district Certification
      • District Energy plans,
      • Building / district Certification
      • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
      • District Energy plans,
      • SECAP Updates
      A3P008: Other
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Net zero carbon footprint,
      • Life Cycle approach,
      • Pollutants Reduction,
      • Greening strategies
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Net zero carbon footprint
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Net zero carbon footprint,
      • Greening strategies,
      • Cool Materials
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Pollutants Reduction,
      • Greening strategies
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Pollutants Reduction
      A3P009: Other
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsPEDs in Italy are meant as strategies towards climate-neutrality: at national/regional/local level a specific legislation on PEDs development is not yet available. However, the European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (‘Renewable energy’ directive - 2018/2001/EU and ‘Common rules for the internal electricity market’ directive- 2019/944/EU). Italy, starting from 2020, has transposed the Directives at national level (‘Milleproroghe’ decree then made effective by ‘Promotion of Renewable sources’ decree 199/2021). At regional level Emilia Romagna in May 2022 developed a law encouraging EC model diffusion (LR 5/2022 ‘Promotion and support of renewable energy communities and renewable energy self-consumers acting collectively’). Energy Community, according to Lindholm et al. 2021, can be considered as ‘a first implementation step towards PEDs.’ISO 45001, ISO 14001, ISO 50001, Zero Waste Policy- European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (Renewable energy directive - 2018/2001/EU and Common rules for the internal electricity market directive- 2019/944/EU). - Spanish building certification is regulated through Royal Decree 235/2013.
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionThe demonstration projects is a new residential development, which consists of an apartment complex which includes 39 apartments spread over 3 floors. It is a sustainble plus energy neighbouhood, and has reached a plus energy balance on its first year in operation. It has MPC controls on the individual heat pumps to improve the energy flexibility of the apartments. It includes the "social beatiful" concepts with a strong emphasis on the social sustainability of the project.Pilastro-Roveri district can be considered as a PED-relevant area. Even though at the moment the area doesn’t meet annual energy positive balance, it addresses some relevant key aspects listed in the JPI UE PED Framework Definition such as: - high level of aspiration in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production; - integration of different systems and infrastructures; - inclusion of aspects not only related to energy sector, but also connected with social, economic and environmental sustainability.The campus should be considered a PED case study due to its exemplary commitment to sustainability and energy efficiency, as evidenced by several of its buildings achieving LEED certification. This certification underscores the campus's adherence to rigorous environmental standards and its proactive steps towards reducing carbon footprints. Also, the integration of sustainable practices across the campus aligns with the PED framework, which aims to create urban areas that produce more energy than they consume. Therefore, this campus serves as a model of how educational institutions can lead the way in fostering sustainable communities and advancing the goals of PED.The pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED).
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentThe need for social housing and the ambition to create a great living environment with a high-performance apartment complex, supplied with renewable energy. It results in lower energy bills for the tenants and high-quality homes.Pilastro-Roveri district is not actually meant to become a PEDs. However, it can be considered as a PED-relevant case-study since a participatory transition pathway towards a more sustainable, efficient and resilient district is gaining ground, involving the main urban stakeholders. At the same time, the most recent city plan and policies (such as the city SECAPs - updated in 2021) are promoting PED model as a key strategy to guide Bologna towards climate neutrality by 2030.The purpose of implementing the PED project on this sustainable campus, where several buildings have LEED certification, is to further enhance its energy efficiency and environmental stewardship by creating a district that generates more energy than it consumes. The initiator was motivated by the need to address climate change, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and promote renewable energy sources. Additionally, the campus's existing commitment to sustainability and the success of its LEED-certified buildings provided a strong foundation for demonstrating the feasibility and benefits of PED development, serving as a model for sustainable urban living and energy self-sufficiency.
      B1P003: Environment of the case study area
      B2P003: Environment of the case study areaSuburban areaUrban areaUrban areaRuralSuburban areaRuralUrban area
      B1P004: Type of district
      B2P004: Type of district
      • New construction
      • New construction
      • Renovation
      • New construction
      • Renovation
      • Renovation
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      • New Development
      • New Development
      • Retrofitting Area
      • New Development
      • Retrofitting Area
      • Retrofitting Area
      B1P006: Year of construction
      B1P006: Year of construction20242005
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential9800
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential9800
      B1P011: Population density before intervention
      B1P011: Population density before intervention00003400
      B1P012: Population density after intervention
      B1P012: Population density after intervention000034.33777154870400
      B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
      B1P013: Residentialnoyesyesnononoyes
      B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]102795
      B1P013: Officenonoyesnononono
      B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Industry and Utilitynonoyesnononono
      B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Commercialnonoyesnononono
      B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Institutionalnonoyesnoyesnono
      B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]285.400
      B1P013: Natural areasnonoyesyesnonono
      B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Recreationalnonoyesnononono
      B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Dismissed areasnonoyesnononono
      B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Othernonononononono
      B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
      B1P014: Residentialyesyesyesyesnonoyes
      B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]2394102795
      B1P014: Officenonoyesyesnonono
      B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonoyesnononono
      B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Commercialnonoyesnononono
      B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Institutionalnonoyesnoyesnono
      B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]280000
      B1P014: Natural areasnonoyesyesnonono
      B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Recreationalnonoyesnononono
      B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Dismissed areasnonoyesnononono
      B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Othernonononononono
      B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
      B2P002: Installation life time
      B2P002: Installation life timeCEDER will follow an integrative approach including technology for a permanent installation.
      B2P003: Scale of action
      B2P003: ScaleDistrict
      B2P004: Operator of the installation
      B2P004: Operator of the installationCIEMAT. Data detail in contact: mariano.martin@ciemat.es and oscar.izquiedo@ciemat.es
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
      B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
      B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?No
      B2P006: Other
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      • Strategic
      B2P007: Other
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabResearch center/University
      B2P008: Other
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      • Academia,
      • Industrial
      B2P009: Other
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activitiesThe operation of the laboratory with all the components of the energy networks requires a collaborative work between various departments and entities. On the one hand, it is necessary to optimize the operation of renewable systems based on the weather conditions, forecast of the demand side and the flexibility of the generation systems. On the other hand, the optimization of the energy demands through a more sustainable behaviour of both the building and the users want to be acquired. For this, it is necessary to take into account technical aspects but also market, comfort and encourage the user participation, creating a decision-making matrix that allows optimizing the operation of the global system.
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      • Buildings,
      • Demand-side management,
      • Prosumers,
      • Renewable generation,
      • Energy storage,
      • Energy networks,
      • Efficiency measures,
      • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
      • Ambient measures,
      • Social interactions
      B2P011: Other
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
      • Tools for prototyping and modelling
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      • Equipment
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      • Energy,
      • Environmental,
      • Economical / Financial
      B2P016: Execution of operations
      B2P016: Execution of operations
      B2P017: Capacities
      B2P017: Capacities- Innovative grid configuration to connect bio boilers and solar thermal on buildings. - Environmental & air quality evaluation. - Testing and evaluation of high efficient heating & cooling systems: Gas, biomass, geothermal and absorption H&C pumps … - Definition and implementation of the different regulation modes for the global system. Using the data from the research focused-partners, several regulation modes for the DH network could be defined and implemented in order to obtain an optimal operation of the network. - Innovation in MPC control to enable harvesting 100% renewables in the most efficient way. - Physical integration of the technologies with the existing facilities at the living lab. - Connection between the solar thermal collectors to achieve the lowest heat losses, providing the possibility to use the grid as high or low temperature DH, according to the demand schedule of the buildings. - Test the bio-boiler of the last generation and ultra-low emissions biomass condensing boiler in order to increase efficiency and reduce GHG and air pollutant emissions of the DH plant. - Control of the supply temperature of the DH grid to enable 100% renewables harvesting in the most efficient way. - Research of the incidence of a normal building or a bioclimatic building in the DH grid demand. - Methodologies for concept validation: Definition of the minimum requirements to verify the suitability of the solutions proposed. - Tests campaign: Experimental operation and characterization in a relevant environment, to exploit the technologies at their best and test different demand profiles, different configuration and loads, with real time monitoring and continuous commissioning to control the performance of the technology. - Validation and upgrading recommendation for the DH&C at district level. - Evaluation of innovation actions for potential energy interventions with demand response in buildings. - The complete available infrastructure (MV and LV electric systems, transformation hubs, end consumption, generation sources, communication elements, etc.) belongs to CEDER-CIEMAT, making this the perfect scenario to test and try the performance of “Smart Grid” and “Microgrid” projects. - The type of electric grid, its voltage levels (MV or LV), its variety of real loads (different buildings with different profiles: industrial buildings, offices and so on) and its sources of renewable generation and storage, mean it is ideal for intermediate tests between a small-scale laboratory and final deployment of the real product.
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholdersCEDER - CIEMAT is a public research body assigned to the Ministry of Science and Innovation under the General Secretariat for Research, focusing on energy and environment. To develop this lab CIEMAT has relations with private renewable companies, research centers and academia institutions.
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P019: Available tools
      • Energy modelling
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P020: External accessibility
      B2P020: External accessibilityCIEMAT is a public body, so it´s open to any institution according the actual regulation and agreements.
      C1P001: Unlocking Factors
      C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
      C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
      C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important
      C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
      C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
      C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
      C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important
      C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
      C1P002: Driving Factors
      C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
      C1P002: Economic growth need1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
      C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
      C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
      C1P003: Administrative barriers
      C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
      C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
      C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
      C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)Delay in the Environmental Dialogue processing in the municipality
      C1P004: Policy barriers
      C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important
      C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
      C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
      C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P005: Regulatory instability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
      C1P005: Non-effective regulations1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
      C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
      C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
      C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
      C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
      C1P006: Environmental barriers
      C1P006: Environmental barriersAir Quality Management Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Energy Efficiency Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Water Conservation Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Waste Management Importance Level: 4 (Important) Material Selection Importance Level: 4 (Important) Renewable Energy Integration Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Heat Island Effect Mitigation Importance Level: 4 (Important) Noise Pollution Control Importance Level: 3 (Moderately Important)3 - Moderately important- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 - Water Scarcity: 1
      C1P007: Technical barriers
      C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P007: Deficient planning1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important
      C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
      C1P007: Lack of well-defined process1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important
      C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
      C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
      C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
      C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
      C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
      C1P008: Inertia1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
      C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important
      C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
      C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
      C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P008: Rebound effect1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
      C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
      C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
      C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
      C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
      C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important
      C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
      C1P010: Financial barriers
      C1P010: Hidden costs1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important
      C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
      C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
      C1P010: Risk and uncertainty5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important
      C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important
      C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
      C1P011: Market barriers
      C1P011: Split incentives1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P011: Energy price distortion1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
      C1P012: Stakeholders involved
      C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Research & Innovation
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Design/demand aggregation
      C1P012: Financial/Funding
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • None
      C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Business process management
      • None
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Urban Services providers
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading
      C1P012: Real Estate developers
      • Planning/leading,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • None
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • None
      C1P012: Design/Construction companies
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Construction/implementation
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • None
      C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Other
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Other (if any)
      Summary

      Authors (framework concept)

      Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

      Contributors (to the content)

      Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

      Implemented by

      Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
      Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)