| Name | Project | Type | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|
| Örebro-Vivalla | JUST PEPP | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Tiurberget, Kongsvinger | JUST PEPP | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Texel | JUST PEPP | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Hällefors, Sweden | JUST PEPP | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona | OPEN4CEC | PED Lab | Compare |
| Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab | OPEN4CEC | PED Lab | Compare |
| Pamplona | OPEN4CEC | PED Lab | Compare |
| Trondheim, Svartlamon | OPEN4CEC | PED Lab | Compare |
| Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus | OPEN4CEC | PED Lab | Compare |
| Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente | COPPER | PED Lab | Compare |
| Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) | PED StepWise | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park | PED StepWise | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten | PED StepWise | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg | HeatCOOP | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH | HeatCOOP | PED Lab | Compare |
| Tartu, Annelinn | V2G-QUESTS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Utrecht, Kanaleneiland | V2G-QUESTS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Aveiro, Aradas district | V2G-QUESTS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Győr Geothermal District Heating Project | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Lecce, SmartEnCity | SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| STARDUST, Trento | STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
| mySMARTlife, Helsinki | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Firenze, Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Sinfonia, Bolzano | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Hunziker Areal, Zürich | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Sharing Cities, Milano | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Smart Otaniemi, Espoo | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
| Zukunftsquartier, Vienna | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Barrio La Pinada, Paterna | PED Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
| Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Võru +CityxChange | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Furuset project, Oslo | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Laser Valley – Land of Lights | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Ydalir project | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Fornebu, Bærum | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Fleuraye west, Carquefou | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Smart Energy Åland | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Romania, Alba Iulia PED | ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Romania, Alba Iulia PED | InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Munich, Harthof district | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Lublin | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran | CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings | PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
| Bærum, Eiksveien 116 | CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Findhorn, the Park | InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED | ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Umeå, Ålidhem district | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Aalborg East | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
| Ankara, Çamlık District | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
| Trenčín | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Luxembourg, Betzdorf | LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Vantaa, Aviapolis | NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Uncompare |
| Vidin, Himik and Bononia | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Oslo, Verksbyen | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Uden, Loopkantstraat | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Zaragoza, Actur | NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Aarhus, Brabrand | BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city | ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Izmir, District of Karşıyaka | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus | LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Espoo, Kera | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study | |
| Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
| Freiburg, Waldsee | PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Graz, Reininghausgründe | PED Case Study | Uncompare | |
| Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Oulu, Kaukovainio | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Halmstad, Fyllinge | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Lund, Brunnshög district | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Vienna, Am Kempelenpark | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Évora, Portugal | POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Groningen, PED South | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Lab | Compare |
| Groningen, PED North | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Lab | Compare |
| Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Lab | Compare |
| Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT | PED Lab | Compare | |
| Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district | STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Leon, Former Sugar Factory district | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Salzburg, Gneis district | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Tartu, City centre area | SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district | GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab | PED Lab | Compare | |
| Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Kifissia, Energy community | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Title | Espoo, Kera | Vantaa, Aviapolis | Ankara, Çamlık District | Graz, Reininghausgründe | Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio | Roubaix, MustBe0 - Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||
| A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab | Espoo, Kera | Vantaa, Aviapolis | Ankara, Çamlık District | Graz, Reininghausgründe | Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio | Roubaix, MustBe0 - Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran |
| A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet | ||||||
| A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet |
|
| ||||
| A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site | ||||||
| PED case study | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | no |
| PED relevant case study | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | yes |
| PED Lab. | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||
| Climate neutrality | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| Annual energy surplus | no | no | yes | no | yes | yes |
| Energy community | no | no | yes | no | yes | no |
| Circularity | yes | yes | no | no | no | no |
| Air quality and urban comfort | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| Electrification | no | no | yes | no | yes | no |
| Net-zero energy cost | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| Net-zero emission | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous) | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| Maximise self-sufficiency | no | no | yes | no | yes | no |
| Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| Other (A1P004) | ||||||
| A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||
| A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED Lab | Planning Phase | Planning Phase | Planning Phase | Implementation Phase | Planning Phase | Completed |
| A1P006: Start Date | ||||||
| A1P006: Start date | 01/15 | 01/23 | 10/22 | 2019 | 01/22 | |
| A1P007: End Date | ||||||
| A1P007: End date | 12/35 | 12/27 | 09/25 | 2025 | 01/24 | |
| A1P008: Reference Project | ||||||
| A1P008: Reference Project | ||||||
| A1P009: Data availability | ||||||
| A1P009: Data availability |
|
|
|
| ||
| A1P009: Other | ||||||
| A1P010: Sources | ||||||
| Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab |
| |||||
| A1P011: Geographic coordinates | ||||||
| X Coordinate (longitude): | 24.75377778 | 24.958821 | 32.795369 | 15.407440 | 15.394495 | 3.1651 |
| Y Coordinate (latitude): | 60.21622222 | 60.305488 | 39.881812 | 47.0607 | 60.486609 | 50.6937 |
| A1P012: Country | ||||||
| A1P012: Country | Finland | Finland | Turkey | Austria | Sweden | France |
| A1P013: City | ||||||
| A1P013: City | Espoo | Vantaa | Ankara | Graz | Borlänge | Roubaix |
| A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification) | ||||||
| A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification). | Dfb | Dfb | Dsb | Dfb | Dsb | Cfb |
| A1P015: District boundary | ||||||
| A1P015: District boundary | Geographic | Geographic | Geographic | Geographic | Geographic | Other |
| Other | PEB | |||||
| A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab | ||||||
| A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab: | Mixed | Mixed | Private | Mixed | Mixed | Private |
| A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure | ||||||
| A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure: | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | Single Owner | Single Owner |
| A1P018: Number of buildings in PED | ||||||
| A1P018: Number of buildings in PED | 257 | 100 | 10 | 1 | ||
| A1P019: Conditioned space | ||||||
| A1P019: Conditioned space [m²] | 22600 | 3700 | 1442 | |||
| A1P020: Total ground area | ||||||
| A1P020: Total ground area [m²] | 580000 | 3881000 | 50800 | 1000000 | 9945 | 2500 |
| A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area | ||||||
| A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| A1P022: Financial schemes | ||||||
| A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estate | no | yes | no | yes | no | yes |
| A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | 0 | |||||
| A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO scheme | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Other | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural funding | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National funding | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional funding | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal funding | no | yes | no | yes | no | yes |
| A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EU | no | yes | yes | no | no | yes |
| A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - National | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regional | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022: Other | Multiple different funding schemes depending on the case. | Multiple different funding schemes depending on the development site within the District and Lab. | Retrofitted through various subsidies | |||
| A1P023: Economic Targets | ||||||
| A1P023: Economic Targets |
|
|
|
|
| |
| A1P023: Other | Circular economy | |||||
| A1P024: More comments: | ||||||
| A1P024: More comments: | The urban morphology of Çamlık District differs in several ways, compared with the typical urban fabric in Türkiye, along with the capital city of Ankara. The houses on the site are composed of three-story attached single-housing units with multiple rows, creating a total of 257 housing units in total. Low-rise buildings coupled with suitably oriented rooftop surfaces brings about significant advantages in the site. Dense greenery in the site also results in reduced cooling energy demand in the buildings. | The “Reininghausgründe” are a new quarter near the centre of the City of Graz. In the area of a former brewery, close to more, still working industries, a new town centre is being established. It will include living areas, workplaces, shops, schools and a park, so that the need for individual mobility is minimized. It is connected to the city centre by bike paths, busses and a tram. Car sharing is provided as well. Some key-energy aspects: • characteristic 1: For the heat supply in the innovative Reininghaus energy model, low-temperature waste heat from a nearby steel plant is harnessed through the use of heat pumps. • characteristic 2: The district heating system operates at low temperatures. • characteristic 3: Generated heat that is not used immediately is stored in the power tower and supplied on demand. Other important aspects of the project are the following: • characteristic 1: Most houses are low-energy houses, some of the certified with the “Klima Aktiv” label • characteristic 2: There are extremely few parking possibilities for residents and visitors; this will foster the use of public transport and bikes • characteristic 3: All the necessary infrastructure for the “daily need” can be reached within walking distance The area of the project is going to be very “green” when finished. Featuring a big district parc, lots of other green spaces are in planning. | The building comprises 32 homes. The refurbishment complies with EnergieSprong specifications. This implies a performance of E=0 over 25 years. | |||
| A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs | ||||||
| A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR] | 3.6 | |||||
| Contact person for general enquiries | ||||||
| A1P026: Name | Joni Mäkinen | Eira Linko | Prof. Dr. İpek Gürsel DİNO | Katharina Schwarz | Jingchun Shen | Julien Holgard |
| A1P027: Organization | City of Espoo | City of Vantaa | Middle East Technical University | StadtLABOR, Innovationen für urbane Lebensqualität GmbH | Högskolan Dalarna | Vilogia |
| A1P028: Affiliation | Municipality / Public Bodies | Municipality / Public Bodies | Research Center / University | SME / Industry | Research Center / University | Other |
| A1P028: Other | Social Housing Company | |||||
| A1P029: Email | joni.makinen@espoo.fi | eira.linko@vantaa.fi | ipekg@metu.edu.tr | katharina.schwarz@stadtlaborgraz.at | jih@du.se | julien.holgard@vilogia.fr |
| Contact person for other special topics | ||||||
| A1P030: Name | Assoc. Prof. Onur Taylan | Hans Schnitzer | Xingxing Zhang | Julien Holgard | ||
| A1P031: Email | otaylan@metu.edu.tr | hans.schnitzer@stadtlaborgraz.at | xza@du.se | julien.holgard@vilogia.fr | ||
| Pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| A2P001: Fields of application | ||||||
| A2P001: Fields of application |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A2P001: Other | Urban Management; Air Quality | |||||
| A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields | ||||||
| A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields | - Kera development commitment (https://www.espoo.fi/en/kera-development-commitment). - SPARCS Co-creation model for sustainable and smart urban areas (www.co-creatingsparcs.fi/en). - Kera area carbon neutrality roadmap (https://static.espoo.fi/cdn/ff/MHDdcMNJ9aYn7CjpoD4zNpo5M-M9HIDLXlJdUrUmf-8/1642756766/public/2022-01/Kera%20carbon%20neutrality%20map_EN.pdf) | Pilot collaboration with landowners. Carbon footprint assessment and planning guidelines in zoning planning. Green infrastructure requirements. Examples of considered energy solutions: waste heat recovery and utilization, geothermal, air-water heat pumps, district heating return water, photovoltaics, A-class energy efficiency, smart control and monitoring, energy storages, E-mobility above national requirements, cooling | The energy consumption and efficiency of the energy model of Çamlık Site, created using EnergyPlus software, have been evaluated under the scenarios specified below. At each stage, a new system was incorporated to explore the potential of the area becoming a PED. In this context, four scenarios were created to compare different energy scenarios for the Ankara pilot area and to observe the impact of the included systems on energy efficiency: V_base; V_ER; V_ER,HP; V_ER,HP,PV. The basic scenario (V_base) was created using the current state without any improvement to the building envelope. This scenario was developed to determine the annual energy needs of the entire site without any intervention and serves as a reference point for the other developed models. The second scenario (V_ER) was created to improve the building envelopes of all residential units in the area, altering the U-values according to Türkiye's current building standards (TS-825). The third scenario (V_ER,HP) primarily includes a heat pump model that can use electrical energy to produce higher thermal energy and is added on top of the improvements in the second scenario. Finally, the V_ER,HP,PV scenario combines building envelope improvements, the heat pump, and the solar PV system. | Energy efficiency: o Several activities: Workshops, Webinars to deepen the knowledge and raise awareness renewable energies o for example rooftop Photovoltaics green & blue infrastructures o Parks, Rooftop Gardens, Quarter Parks, Water elements included in the parks rooftop farming o To produce vegetables in the quarter stormwater management mobility o less parking and less cars in the district. Solutions for boosting public transport with sponsored public transport tickets; building of better bike and pedestrian infrastructure social aspects o district management was established in the district local supply of goods of daily need o Schools within 15 minutes walking distance Supermarkets and other shops within the district | Load calculation and system optimisation: City Energy Analyst Identification of stranded assets for asset owners and investors to understand the carbon risks: CRREM | |
| A2P003: Application of ISO52000 | ||||||
| A2P003: Application of ISO52000 | No | No | Yes | No | No | No |
| A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance | ||||||
| A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance | ||||||
| A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance | No | No | Yes | No | No | |
| A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation | ||||||
| A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation | The calculation of the energy balance will be further developed and specified under the Neutralpath-project. Mobility related emissions are taken into account in the carbon footprint calculation of each zoning plan in the development area. | Mobility is not included in the calculations. | - Number of cars per household - Fraction of electric cars - Number of public transport tickets (week/ annual tickets) | |||
| A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand | ||||||
| A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum] | 54.5 | 3.446 | 0.6777 | |||
| A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand | ||||||
| A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum] | 19.4 | 0.528 | 0.03656 | |||
| A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility | ||||||
| A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum] | 0 | |||||
| A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure | ||||||
| A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum] | 0 | |||||
| A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year | ||||||
| A2P011: PV | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
| A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 4 | 3.4240 | ||||
| A2P011: Wind | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P011: Hydro | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P011: Biomass_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P011: Biomass_peat_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P011: PVT_el | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.01818 | |||||
| A2P011: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year | ||||||
| A2P012: Geothermal | no | yes | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Solar Thermal | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Biomass_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Waste heat+HP | yes | yes | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Biomass_peat_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: PVT_th | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.0825 | |||||
| A2P012: Biomass_firewood_th | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes | ||||||
| A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes | Local energy utility will implement district level thermal solution. First, energy will be produced from waste heat from a local data center. Further thermal solutions are under discussion and development. | Groundwater (used for heat pumps) | ||||
| A2P014: Annual energy use | ||||||
| A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum] | 78.8 | 3.976 | 0.318 | 0.084 | ||
| A2P015: Annual energy delivered | ||||||
| A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum] | 15.4 | 0.2055 | 0.11 | |||
| A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year | ||||||
| A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year | ||||||
| A2P017: Gas | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P017: Coal | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P017: Oil | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P017: Other | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | 0 | |||||
| A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year | ||||||
| A2P018: PV | no | yes | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: Wind | no | yes | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: Hydro | no | yes | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: Biomass_el | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: Biomass_peat_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: PVT_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: Other | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | 0.187 | |||||
| A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year | ||||||
| A2P019: Geothermal | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Solar Thermal | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Biomass_heat | no | yes | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Waste heat+HP | no | yes | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Biomass_peat_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: PVT_th | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Biomass_firewood_th | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Other | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0 | |||||
| A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary | ||||||
| A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.53839572192513 | 0 |
| A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED | ||||||
| A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum] | 450000 | 0.036 | 6.93 | |||
| A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||
| A2P022: Safety & Security | none | |||||
| A2P022: Health | thermal comfort diagram | |||||
| A2P022: Education | none | |||||
| A2P022: Mobility | x | none | ||||
| A2P022: Energy | x | normalized CO2/GHG & Energy intensity | ||||
| A2P022: Water | x | |||||
| A2P022: Economic development | x | cost of excess emissions | ||||
| A2P022: Housing and Community | x | |||||
| A2P022: Waste | ||||||
| A2P022: Other | ||||||
| A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation | ||||||
| A2P023: Photovoltaics | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| A2P023: Solar thermal collectors | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P023: Wind Turbines | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Geothermal energy system | no | yes | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P023: Waste heat recovery | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | no |
| A2P023: Waste to energy | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Polygeneration | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Co-generation | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Heat Pump | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | no |
| A2P023: Hydrogen | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Hydropower plant | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Biomass | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Biogas | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Other | The technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case. | |||||
| A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility | ||||||
| A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | no |
| A2P024: Energy management system | yes | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A2P024: Demand-side management | yes | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A2P024: Smart electricity grid | yes | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A2P024: Thermal Storage | no | yes | no | yes | yes | no |
| A2P024: Electric Storage | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A2P024: District Heating and Cooling | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | no |
| A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systems | no | yes | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P024: P2P – buildings | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P024: Other | The technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case. | |||||
| A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency | ||||||
| A2P025: Deep Retrofitting | no | no | yes | no | yes | yes |
| A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildings | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P025: High-performance new buildings | yes | yes | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting) | yes | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P025: Urban data platforms | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Mobile applications for citizens | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting) | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | no |
| A2P025: Smart irrigation | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposal | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Smart surveillance | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Other | The technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case. | |||||
| A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility | ||||||
| A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private) | yes | yes | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances) | yes | yes | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P026: e-Mobility | yes | yes | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutions | yes | yes | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P026: Car-free area | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P026: Other | ||||||
| A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes | ||||||
| A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes | - Multimodal mobility nodes - Support of public transport tickets - Mobility consulting - District management | |||||
| A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates | ||||||
| A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | No |
| A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes | Energieausweis mandatory if buildings/ flats/ apartments are sold | |||||
| A2P029: Any other building / district certificates | ||||||
| A2P029: Any other building / district certificates | No | No | Yes | No | No | |
| A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes | Klimaaktiv standard Voluntary! Certification can be for buildings and/or quarters. The different quarters are built in different standards. Ranging from bronze/silver/gold | |||||
| A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy | ||||||
| A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy | ||||||
| A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy | Carbon-Neutral Vantaa by 2030 (min. 80 % reduction of yearly emissions, capture or compensation os the residual 20 %), | City level targets Klimaschutzplan Graz - 2022 | Targets: - Climate neutrality until 2040 - Social justice and high quality of life - High innovation levels Mobilitätsplan Graz 2040 – under development | Targets: - Modal Split 80:20 until 2040 80% Public transport, bike, walking | 20% cars Kommunales Energiekonzept (2017) | Targets: - Increase of district heating Energiemasterplan Graz (2018) | Targets: - Energy efficiency of urban dwellings and infrastructures - District heating and solar energy - Energy efficiency of private dwellings - Climate conscious mobility National level targets Klimaschutzplan Österreich -draft, expected by 2024 | Targets: - Decarbonisation (reduction of GHG, renewable energies, - Climate neutrality until 2040 - Energy efficiency - Security of energy supply | The study aligns closely with the decarbonisation and energy reduction pathways of residential multi family buildings with 1.5°C global warming target in Sweden. This study will also contribute to the achievement of the carbon neturality of whole Borlänge city by 2030. | |||
| A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid | ||||||
| A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid |
|
|
| |||
| A3P003: Other | ||||||
| A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities | ||||||
| A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities | According to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary with heat pumps. Rooftop photovoltaic panels also have the potential for renewable energy generation. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity through this scenario. | Reininghaus needs green spaces and places Sector coupling of water, waste water, electricity ICT and demand side management Mobility - Reininghaus needs better infrastructure for bikes and pedestrians - Public transportation should be more affordable and Sharing should be implemented in the district Infrastructure should cover daily needs within walking distance Infrastructure for local jobs and shared offices | In our project, we carried out a comprehensive exploration of strategies to achieve positive energy districts in a Swedish residential portfolio. The focus on urban energy transitions necessitates a holistic approach that integrates building retrofit, solar technology exploration, and heating supply optimisation. Exploration of Local Solar Sources: The analysis reveals varying solar irradiance resources throughout the year, emphasizing the importance of strategic placement. Integration of combined photovoltaic and thermal panels into building envelopes demonstrates the potential to cover a significant portion of the energy demand even in Sweden. Heating Supply Optimisation with Solar Technologies: Despite the surplus energy production from on-site solar technology, challenges arise due to temporal energy asymmetry. The introduction of heat pumps emerges as a feasible solution to balance energy gaps, utilising both rejected and free heat. Optimisation scenarios, utilising a combination of geothermal heat pumps, water source heat pumps, and PVT, showcase remarkable reductions in emissions and primary energy consumption. Urban Form and Energy Infrastructure Design: We realised the importance of returning to urban form and energy infrastructure design to optimise future residential portfolio potential. Building layout design, influenced by zoning regulations and innovative typologies, plays a crucial role in achieving district level energy efficiency. Future challenges, including demographic shifts, e-mobility, and climate change, necessitate a more holistic approach to energy infrastructure design, addressing not only heating and electricity demands but also cooling requirements. | |||
| A3P005: Sustainable behaviour | ||||||
| A3P005: Sustainable behaviour | - citizen participation and promotion of functioning neighbourhoods (e.g., through city district management) As of today, solutions for the energy transition in the residential sector have focused on the construction of energy-efficient buildings and on the energy-efficient refurbishment of existing buildings. Measures to influence user behaviour and to directly address residents and neighbourhoods as actors of the energy transition play a minor role and are also not formalized. At the same time, moving into a new apartment offers a ‘window of opportunity’ to establish new everyday practices and behaviour. In already inhabited housing developments, well-functioning neighbourhoods or existing, ‘sustainability pioneers’ are key to motivating people to adopt more resource-efficient lifestyles. In order to prepare such agents of change towards more climate protection and sustainability in the context of housing, Austria launched the BAREWO project. The aim is to develop a kit of formats, methods, and interventions for resource-efficient housing. This toolkit will be tested in six testbeds, among which quarter 12 (Q12) of Graz- Reininghaus, as soon as first residents move in (approx. 2024). Austrian TRANS-PED partner StadtLABOR, which is also a partner in the BAREWO project, will support Q12 in this process. In parallel, a monitoring system will be developed to make the (climate) effects of the kit measurable. In addition, a guideline for property managers will be developed, which will serve as an orientation for them on how their residents can be coached in matters of climate protection and sustainability in everyday (residential) life. From the very beginning, (communication) measures are implemented and relevant stakeholders are involved in the project (project advisory board) to ensure the multiplicability, financing and broad application of the toolkit. If successful, the toolkit could also be scaled up to other quarters in Reininghaus. | While our investigation primarily centres on technical optimisation within Positive Energy District (PED) development, it is essential to acknowledge the broader scope encompassing social and governance dimensions. Specifically, understanding stakeholders' willingness to embrace technical recommendations upon project completion is important. Several potential influencing factors merit exploration, including economic considerations, technical optimisation-associated embodied carbon balance, the general public's technical perceptions, and operational feasibility. Evaluating these aspects holistically not only enhances the efficacy of PED initiatives but also fosters greater acceptance and participation within the communities they serve. | ||||
| A3P006: Economic strategies | ||||||
| A3P006: Economic strategies |
|
|
|
| ||
| A3P006: Other | ||||||
| A3P007: Social models | ||||||
| A3P007: Social models |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A3P007: Other | ||||||
| A3P008: Integrated urban strategies | ||||||
| A3P008: Integrated urban strategies |
|
|
|
|
| |
| A3P008: Other | ||||||
| A3P009: Environmental strategies | ||||||
| A3P009: Environmental strategies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A3P009: Other | Energy Positive, Low Emission Zone | |||||
| A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects | ||||||
| A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects | Mobility contracts: A mobility contract is concluded between the City of Graz and the property developers in the course of development plans and serves to reduce the motor vehicle traffic to be expected as a result of the construction project. Push & pull measures are agreed: With a lower car parking space key, which is significantly lower than today's usual requirements, offers and information for easier use of public transport, walking and cycling, as well as car sharing and e-mobility are simultaneously created by the property developers, leading to a win-win-win situation for all parties involved. Basic principles - Possibility of combining effective "push & pull" measures => control option (e.g. reduction of car parking spaces, but optimisation of accessibility to public transport and walking and cycling networks, public transport tickets, mobility information, ... etc.) - Changing mobility behaviour in favour of sustainable forms of transport from the moment the flat is handed over ("upheaval" in personal mobility behaviour when changing the residential location) - Reduction in construction and maintenance costs (underground car parks, public road infrastructure) - Easier realisation of larger construction projects in the inner city area with lower generation of vehicle demand Städtebauliche Verträge in Graz / Urban development contracts in Graz Qualitative urban (neighbourhood) development with added value for all stakeholders: urban development contracts are modern instruments in the development of cities and neighbourhoods. As one of the pioneers in this field, the City of Graz also increasingly favours this form of quality assurance. Urban development contracts are a contractual form of regulation between the City of Graz and landowners, which enables flexible control of urban (sub)development in the interests of the common interests while at the same time relieving the public authorities. The contracts make property-related stipulations in accordance with urban planning requirements (e.g. urban development concept, development concept, framework plan, zoning plan) and the specialist planning requirements in particular infrastructure, development, design and mobility. This is intended to infrastructure, services of general interest, building land quality and settlement development required for the (parts of the) city. | |||||
| B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition | ||||||
| B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition | Implementation of district level heating system to make heating energy positive and expanding local renewable electricity production. | Neutralpath-project is working with the cocept of PCEDs = Positive and Clean Energy Districts (energy-efficient and energy-flexible districts with net zero greenhouse gas emissions and a surplus of renewable energy). Aviapolis Climate-Neutral Lab will work with both PCED and PCED relevant cases within the district. | Çamlık District, unlike many other districts in Ankara, has a specific urban morphology that draws near the other pilot zones considered by the partners of PED-ACT. The site has three-storey single housing units, along with a fair amount of greenery around. Furthermore, the roof areas enable large amounts of PV installment, which results in higher amounts of local renewable energy potential. Therefore, the district is a good fit for PED development. | Reininghaus addresses some relevant key aspects listed in the JPI UE PED Framework Definition such as: - high level of aspiration in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production; - integration of different systems and infrastructures; - inclusion of aspects not only related to energy sector, but also connected with social, economic and environmental sustainability. | The Rymdgatan's Residential Portfolio in Sweden presents a compelling case study for its classification as a PED-related research, given its alignment with sustainable behaviours and overarching PED development principles as follows: Inclusivity and Social Equity: The residential portfolio situated in Rymdgatan caters primarily to a low-income community. By focusing on this demographic, the project addresses critical aspects of social equity within sustainable urban development. Ensuring access to energy-efficient housing and amenities for economically disadvantaged populations not only fosters social cohesion but also mitigates energy poverty, a pressing concern in many urban contexts. Multifamily Residential Building: The inclusion of multifamily residential buildings within the portfolio underscores a commitment to density and efficient land use, both essential components of sustainable urban design. Such developments promote resource optimisation by consolidating housing units, thereby reducing per capita energy consumption and infrastructure demands. Moreover, multifamily dwellings often facilitate community engagement and shared resource management, fostering a culture of sustainability among residents. Low Carbon Retrofitting and Transition: The overarching initiative to transition the entire Jakobsgårdarna district. The included Rymdgatan portfolio, towards low carbon retrofitting, represents a significant example of decarbonization and climate resilience. By integrating energy-efficient technologies and renewable energy solutions into existing infrastructure, the project not only reduces carbon emissions but also serves as a blueprint for revitalising old urban environments sustainably. This holistic approach to retrofitting demonstrates a systemic commitment to environmental stewardship and long-term sustainability. Climate Adaptation and Renewable Energy Integration: Despite Sweden's climatic challenges, including lower solar resources during winter months, the Rymdgatan project leverages its geographical context to optimize renewable energy utilization. Sweden's greater solar resource availability during summer and geothermal potentials complement the design's emphasis on seasonal energy planning, where surplus energy generated during peak periods can be stored or redistributed efficiently. By embracing climate-responsive design strategies, the project demonstrates resilience in the face of climate variability while harnessing renewable energy potential effectively. | Refurbishment of social housing. The refurbishment complies with EnergieSprong specifications. This implies a performance of E=0 over 25 years. |
| B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development | ||||||
| B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development | According to Vantaa city strategy 2021-2025 Aviapolis area aims to become the greenest airport city in Europe. The district is transforming from a logistics and business focused area to a lively urban district which gives an opportunity to rethink the areas energy solutions. With Neutralpath-project Vantaa aims to support the development of the district's energy system and explore innovative, energy efficient and fossil free district energy solutions. | PED-ACT project. | The Reininghausgründe is a new quarter near the centre of the City of Graz. On the area of a former brewery, close to more, still working industries, a new town centre is being established. The quarter will include living areas, workplaces, shops, schools and a park, so that the need for individual mobility is minimized. It is connected to the historical city centre by bike paths, busses and a tram. Car sharing is provided as well. | Borlänge city has committed to become the carbon-neutral city by 2030. | Refurbishment of social housing | |
| B1P003: Environment of the case study area | ||||||
| B2P003: Environment of the case study area | Urban area | Urban area | Suburban area | Urban area | Urban area | Suburban area |
| B1P004: Type of district | ||||||
| B2P004: Type of district |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B1P005: Case Study Context | ||||||
| B1P005: Case Study Context |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B1P006: Year of construction | ||||||
| B1P006: Year of construction | 1986 | 2025 | 1990 | 1958 | ||
| B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential | ||||||
| B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential | 0 | 100 | ||||
| B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential | ||||||
| B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential | 14000 | 10000 | 100 | |||
| B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential | ||||||
| B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential | 0 | 6 | ||||
| B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential | ||||||
| B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential | 10000 | 6 | ||||
| B1P011: Population density before intervention | ||||||
| B1P011: Population density before intervention | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| B1P012: Population density after intervention | ||||||
| B1P012: Population density after intervention | 0.041379310344828 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.010658622423328 | 0 |
| B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention | ||||||
| B1P013: Residential | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | yes |
| B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²] | 50800 | 4360 | ||||
| B1P013: Office | yes | yes | no | no | no | no |
| B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Industry and Utility | yes | yes | no | yes | no | no |
| B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Commercial | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Institutional | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Natural areas | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Recreational | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Dismissed areas | yes | yes | no | no | no | no |
| B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Other | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²] | 706 | |||||
| B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention | ||||||
| B1P014: Residential | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²] | 50800 | 4360 | ||||
| B1P014: Office | yes | yes | no | yes | no | no |
| B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Industry and Utility | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Commercial | yes | yes | no | yes | no | no |
| B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Institutional | no | yes | no | yes | no | no |
| B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Natural areas | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Recreational | yes | yes | no | yes | no | no |
| B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Dismissed areas | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Other | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²] | 706 | |||||
| B2P001: PED Lab concept definition | ||||||
| B2P001: PED Lab concept definition | Neutralpath-project is working with the cocept of PCEDs = Positive and Clean Energy Districts (energy-efficient and energy-flexible districts with net zero greenhouse gas emissions and a surplus of renewable energy). Aviapolis Climate-Neutral Lab will work with both PCED and PCED relevant cases within the district. | |||||
| B2P002: Installation life time | ||||||
| B2P002: Installation life time | ||||||
| B2P003: Scale of action | ||||||
| B2P003: Scale | District | |||||
| B2P004: Operator of the installation | ||||||
| B2P004: Operator of the installation | The City of Vantaa manages the lab, working closely with landowners and other stakeholders such as energy companies, solution providers, universities and citizens. | |||||
| B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials | ||||||
| B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials | ||||||
| B2P006: Circular Economy Approach | ||||||
| B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials? | ||||||
| B2P006: Other | ||||||
| B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab |
| |||||
| B2P007: Other | ||||||
| B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab | Municipality | |||||
| B2P008: Other | ||||||
| B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab |
| |||||
| B2P009: Other | ||||||
| B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities | ||||||
| B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities | ||||||
| B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P011: Other | ||||||
| B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people | ||||||
| B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people | ||||||
| B2P014: Monitoring measures | ||||||
| B2P014: Monitoring measures | ||||||
| B2P015: Key Performance indicators | ||||||
| B2P015: Key Performance indicators |
| |||||
| B2P016: Execution of operations | ||||||
| B2P016: Execution of operations | ||||||
| B2P017: Capacities | ||||||
| B2P017: Capacities | ||||||
| B2P018: Relations with stakeholders | ||||||
| B2P018: Relations with stakeholders | ||||||
| B2P019: Available tools | ||||||
| B2P019: Available tools |
| |||||
| B2P019: Available tools | ||||||
| B2P020: External accessibility | ||||||
| B2P020: External accessibility | To follow the lab and Vantaa's activities in Neutralpath, fill in the following form: https://neutralpath.eu/fi/tayta-lomake-liittyaksesi-cn-labiin/ | |||||
| C1P001: Unlocking Factors | ||||||
| C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up) | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down) | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.) | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES) | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any) | Real-estate market situation | |||||
| C1P002: Driving Factors | ||||||
| C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency) | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P002: Economic growth need | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.) | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any) | ||||||
| C1P003: Administrative barriers | ||||||
| C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P003: Lack of public participation | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos) | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P004: Policy barriers | ||||||
| C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers | ||||||
| C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P005: Regulatory instability | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P005: Non-effective regulations | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P006: Environmental barriers | ||||||
| C1P006: Environmental barriers | - Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Water Scarcity: 1 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 | 2 - Slightly important | ||||
| C1P007: Technical barriers | ||||||
| C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Deficient planning | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Lack of well-defined process | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers | ||||||
| C1P008: Inertia | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P008: Rebound effect | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers | ||||||
| C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P010: Financial barriers | ||||||
| C1P010: Hidden costs | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P010: Economic crisis | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P010: Risk and uncertainty | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P011: Market barriers | ||||||
| C1P011: Split incentives | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P011: Energy price distortion | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs) | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P012: Stakeholders involved | ||||||
| C1P012: Government/Public Authorities |
|
|
|
| ||
| C1P012: Research & Innovation |
|
|
|
| ||
| C1P012: Financial/Funding |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data |
|
|
|
| ||
| C1P012: Business process management |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: Urban Services providers |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: Real Estate developers |
|
|
|
| ||
| C1P012: Design/Construction companies |
|
|
|
| ||
| C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens |
|
|
|
| ||
| C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce |
|
|
|
| ||
| C1P012: Other |
| |||||
| C1P012: Other (if any) | ||||||
| Summary |
Authors (framework concept)
Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)
Contributors (to the content)
Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)
Implemented by
Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)
