Search
Close this search box.
Search
Map View
Table View
Projects
Filters:
Clear Filters Export All Entries (CSV)
NameProjectTypeCompare
Örebro-Vivalla JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Texel JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hällefors, Sweden JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lecce, SmartEnCity SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Firenze, Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Uncompare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Uncompare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Uncompare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleEspoo, Kera
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio
«×»
Ankara, Çamlık District
«×»
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city
«×»
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district
«×»
Fornebu, Bærum
«×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabEspoo, KeraBorlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential PortfolioAnkara, Çamlık DistrictRiga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student cityLeipzig, Baumwollspinnerei districtFornebu, Bærum
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studyyesnoyesyesyesyes
PED relevant case studyyesyesyesnonono
PED Lab.nononononono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusnoyesyesnonono
Energy communitynoyesyesyesnono
Circularityyesnonononono
Air quality and urban comfortnonononoyesno
Electrificationnoyesyesnoyesno
Net-zero energy costnonoyesnonono
Net-zero emissionnonoyesnonoyes
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nononoyesnono
Maximise self-sufficiencynoyesyesyesnono
Othernonononoyesyes
Other (A1P004)Net-zero emission; Annual energy surplusSustainable neighbourhood; Energy efficient
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabPlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhaseImplementation PhaseCompleted
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date01/1510/2201/2401/18
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date12/3509/2512/2612/23
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
      A1P011: Geographic coordinates
      X Coordinate (longitude):24.7537777815.39449532.79536924.0816833912.31845810.611407
      Y Coordinate (latitude):60.2162222260.48660939.88181256.9524595651.32649259.898985
      A1P012: Country
      A1P012: CountryFinlandSwedenTurkeyLatviaGermanyNorway
      A1P013: City
      A1P013: CityEspooBorlängeAnkaraRigaLeipzigBærum
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).DfbDsbDsbCfbDfbDfb
      A1P015: District boundary
      A1P015: District boundaryGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicFunctional
      OtherGeographic
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:MixedMixedPrivatePublicMixed
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle Owner
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED10257152
      A1P019: Conditioned space
      A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]37002260017000017000
      A1P020: Total ground area
      A1P020: Total ground area [m²]58000099455080011926430000
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area000110
      A1P022: Financial schemes
      A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estatenononononono
      A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenononononono
      A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernononononono
      A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnononononono
      A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnononononono
      A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnononononono
      A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnononononono
      A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernononononono
      A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnonoyesyesnono
      A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]7500000
      A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonoyesnonono
      A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnononononono
      A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernononononono
      A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022: OtherMultiple different funding schemes depending on the case.
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      • Job creation,
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local businesses,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production,
      • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local businesses,
      • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      • Boosting local businesses,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      A1P023: OtherCircular economySustainable and replicable business models regarding renewable energy systems
      A1P024: More comments:
      A1P024: More comments:The urban morphology of Çamlık District differs in several ways, compared with the typical urban fabric in Türkiye, along with the capital city of Ankara. The houses on the site are composed of three-story attached single-housing units with multiple rows, creating a total of 257 housing units in total. Low-rise buildings coupled with suitably oriented rooftop surfaces brings about significant advantages in the site. Dense greenery in the site also results in reduced cooling energy demand in the buildings.
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]
      Contact person for general enquiries
      A1P026: NameJoni MäkinenJingchun ShenProf. Dr. İpek Gürsel DİNOJudith StiekemaSimon BaumChristoph Gollner
      A1P027: OrganizationCity of EspooHögskolan DalarnaMiddle East Technical UniversityOASCCENERO Energy GmbHFFG
      A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityOtherOtherOther
      A1P028: Othernot for profit private organisationCENERO Energy GmbH
      A1P029: Emailjoni.makinen@espoo.fijih@du.seipekg@metu.edu.trjudith@oascities.orgsib@cenero.dechristoph.gollner@ffg.at
      Contact person for other special topics
      A1P030: NameXingxing ZhangAssoc. Prof. Onur TaylanSimon Baum
      A1P031: Emailxza@du.seotaylan@metu.edu.trsib@cenero.de
      Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYes
      A2P001: Fields of application
      A2P001: Fields of application
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies,
      • Waste management,
      • Construction materials
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Construction materials
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy production,
      • Construction materials
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility
      A2P001: Other
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields- Kera development commitment (https://www.espoo.fi/en/kera-development-commitment). - SPARCS Co-creation model for sustainable and smart urban areas (www.co-creatingsparcs.fi/en). - Kera area carbon neutrality roadmap (https://static.espoo.fi/cdn/ff/MHDdcMNJ9aYn7CjpoD4zNpo5M-M9HIDLXlJdUrUmf-8/1642756766/public/2022-01/Kera%20carbon%20neutrality%20map_EN.pdf)Load calculation and system optimisation: City Energy Analyst Identification of stranded assets for asset owners and investors to understand the carbon risks: CRREMThe energy consumption and efficiency of the energy model of Çamlık Site, created using EnergyPlus software, have been evaluated under the scenarios specified below. At each stage, a new system was incorporated to explore the potential of the area becoming a PED. In this context, four scenarios were created to compare different energy scenarios for the Ankara pilot area and to observe the impact of the included systems on energy efficiency: V_base; V_ER; V_ER,HP; V_ER,HP,PV. The basic scenario (V_base) was created using the current state without any improvement to the building envelope. This scenario was developed to determine the annual energy needs of the entire site without any intervention and serves as a reference point for the other developed models. The second scenario (V_ER) was created to improve the building envelopes of all residential units in the area, altering the U-values according to Türkiye's current building standards (TS-825). The third scenario (V_ER,HP) primarily includes a heat pump model that can use electrical energy to produce higher thermal energy and is added on top of the improvements in the second scenario. Finally, the V_ER,HP,PV scenario combines building envelope improvements, the heat pump, and the solar PV system.A suite of replicable modeling tools will enable stakeholders to analyze planning actions towards positive energy in a cost-effective fashion, aiding their evidence based decision-making process. The tools will be able to model the district’s energy production and demand, optimize for flexibility and simulate mobility and transport. By employing gamification and co-creation approaches, the project will enhance public awareness and engagement in energy efficiency. The project will culminate in the publication of practical guidelines, reusable models, algorithms, and training materials to aid other cities to replicate the digital twin for their districts, fostering widespread adoption of sustainable energy practices.
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoNoYesNo
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesYesYes
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNoYes
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationMobility is not included in the calculations.The university operates a fleet of 13 electric vehicles (EV) (61kW power each). There are 5 EV charging stations on campus.
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]54.50.67773.44680001.65
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]19.40.036560.5285000
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]00
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]0
      A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P011: PVyesnoyesnoyesno
      A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]43.4240
      A2P011: Windnononoyesnono
      A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Hydronononononono
      A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_elnononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: PVT_elnoyesnoyesnono
      A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.01818
      A2P011: Othernononononono
      A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P012: Geothermalnononononono
      A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Solar Thermalnononononono
      A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_heatnononoyesnono
      A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Waste heat+HPyesnonononono
      A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: PVT_thnoyesnononono
      A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.0825
      A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Othernononononono
      A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesLocal energy utility will implement district level thermal solution. First, energy will be produced from waste heat from a local data center. Further thermal solutions are under discussion and development.Conventional power generation: The university’s heat supply is designed as a local centralized heat supply system. Electrical power, generated in combined heat and power (CHP) units, is delivered to the distribution network and sold to energy traders as regulated by local legislation and norms. There are two natural gas burners acting as heat sources (3MW and 6MW capacity), and two CHP units (1.6MW and 0.45MW thermal capacity). All heating is supplied from the CHP plants. Renewable Energy Sources (RES): a wind turbine (3.6 kW) and PV panels (11.7 kW) are connected to the faculty microgrid. In the future it is planned to power the campus entirely from local RES.
      A2P014: Annual energy use
      A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]78.80.3183.9762.421
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]15.40.2055
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]00
      A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P017: Gasnonoyesyesnono
      A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Coalnononononono
      A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Oilnononononono
      A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Othernoyesnononono
      A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
      A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P018: PVnononononono
      A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Windnononononono
      A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Hydronononononono
      A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_elnononononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnononononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: PVT_elnononononono
      A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Othernoyesnononono
      A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.187
      A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P019: Geothermalnononononono
      A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Solar Thermalnononononono
      A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_heatnononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Waste heat+HPnononononono
      A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: PVT_thnononononono
      A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Othernoyesnononono
      A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary00.538395721925130000
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]4500006.93
      A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
      A2P022: Safety & Securitynone
      A2P022: Healththermal comfort diagram
      A2P022: Educationnone
      A2P022: MobilitynoneMode of transport; Access to public transport
      A2P022: Energynormalized CO2/GHG & Energy intensityapplyEnergy efficiency in buildings (Net energy need; Gross energy need; Total energy need)
      A2P022: Water
      A2P022: Economic developmentcost of excess emissions
      A2P022: Housing and CommunityDelivery and proximity to amenities
      A2P022: Waste
      A2P022: OtherGHG emissions; Power/load; Life cycle cost (LCC); Demographic needs and consultation plan; Public Space
      A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
      A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesyesyesnonoyes
      A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnoyesnonoyesno
      A2P023: Wind Turbinesnononononono
      A2P023: Geothermal energy systemnoyesnononono
      A2P023: Waste heat recoveryyesyesnononono
      A2P023: Waste to energynononononono
      A2P023: Polygenerationnononononono
      A2P023: Co-generationnononononono
      A2P023: Heat Pumpyesyesyesnoyesno
      A2P023: Hydrogennononononono
      A2P023: Hydropower plantnononononono
      A2P023: Biomassnononononono
      A2P023: Biogasnononononono
      A2P023: Other
      A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
      A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)yesyesnoyesnono
      A2P024: Energy management systemyesnonoyesnono
      A2P024: Demand-side managementyesnonoyesnono
      A2P024: Smart electricity gridyesnonoyesnono
      A2P024: Thermal Storagenoyesnoyesnono
      A2P024: Electric Storagenononoyesnono
      A2P024: District Heating and Coolingyesyesnoyesnono
      A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnononoyesnono
      A2P024: P2P – buildingsnononononono
      A2P024: Other
      A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
      A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnoyesyesnonono
      A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnononononono
      A2P025: High-performance new buildingsyesnonononono
      A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)yesnonononono
      A2P025: Urban data platformsyesnonoyesnono
      A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnononoyesnono
      A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)yesyesyesyesnono
      A2P025: Smart irrigationnononononono
      A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnononononono
      A2P025: Smart surveillancenonononoyesno
      A2P025: Other
      A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
      A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)yesnonononono
      A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)yesnononoyesno
      A2P026: e-Mobilityyesnononoyesno
      A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsyesnonononono
      A2P026: Car-free areanononononono
      A2P026: Other
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notesTest-Concept for bidirectional charging.The Fornebu area will contain urban structures that will facilitate low and zero carbon mobility within the area, including pedestrian walking, bicycling and electrical vehicles.
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesNoNoNoNo
      A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoNoNoYes
      A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesAll buildings should be certified according to BREEAM-NOR Excellent
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
      • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Smart cities strategies,
      • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Smart cities strategies
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyThe study aligns closely with the decarbonisation and energy reduction pathways of residential multi family buildings with 1.5°C global warming target in Sweden. This study will also contribute to the achievement of the carbon neturality of whole Borlänge city by 2030.
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
      • Biogas
      A3P003: Other
      A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
      A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesIn our project, we carried out a comprehensive exploration of strategies to achieve positive energy districts in a Swedish residential portfolio. The focus on urban energy transitions necessitates a holistic approach that integrates building retrofit, solar technology exploration, and heating supply optimisation. Exploration of Local Solar Sources: The analysis reveals varying solar irradiance resources throughout the year, emphasizing the importance of strategic placement. Integration of combined photovoltaic and thermal panels into building envelopes demonstrates the potential to cover a significant portion of the energy demand even in Sweden. Heating Supply Optimisation with Solar Technologies: Despite the surplus energy production from on-site solar technology, challenges arise due to temporal energy asymmetry. The introduction of heat pumps emerges as a feasible solution to balance energy gaps, utilising both rejected and free heat. Optimisation scenarios, utilising a combination of geothermal heat pumps, water source heat pumps, and PVT, showcase remarkable reductions in emissions and primary energy consumption. Urban Form and Energy Infrastructure Design: We realised the importance of returning to urban form and energy infrastructure design to optimise future residential portfolio potential. Building layout design, influenced by zoning regulations and innovative typologies, plays a crucial role in achieving district level energy efficiency. Future challenges, including demographic shifts, e-mobility, and climate change, necessitate a more holistic approach to energy infrastructure design, addressing not only heating and electricity demands but also cooling requirements.According to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary with heat pumps. Rooftop photovoltaic panels also have the potential for renewable energy generation. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity through this scenario.
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviourWhile our investigation primarily centres on technical optimisation within Positive Energy District (PED) development, it is essential to acknowledge the broader scope encompassing social and governance dimensions. Specifically, understanding stakeholders' willingness to embrace technical recommendations upon project completion is important. Several potential influencing factors merit exploration, including economic considerations, technical optimisation-associated embodied carbon balance, the general public's technical perceptions, and operational feasibility. Evaluating these aspects holistically not only enhances the efficacy of PED initiatives but also fosters greater acceptance and participation within the communities they serve.
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      • PPP models,
      • Circular economy models
      • Open data business models,
      • Life Cycle Cost,
      • Circular economy models,
      • Local trading
      • Open data business models,
      • Innovative business models,
      • Demand management Living Lab
      • Innovative business models,
      • Other
      A3P006: Otheroperational savings through efficiency measures
      A3P007: Social models
      A3P007: Social models
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Quality of Life
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
      • Social incentives,
      • Affordability,
      • Digital Inclusion
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Affordability
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
      • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement
      A3P007: Other
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      • Strategic urban planning,
      • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
      • District Energy plans
      • Strategic urban planning,
      • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
      • District Energy plans,
      • Building / district Certification
      • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
      • District Energy plans
      • Digital twinning and visual 3D models
      A3P008: Other
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      • Net zero carbon footprint,
      • Life Cycle approach,
      • Greening strategies,
      • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Net zero carbon footprint,
      • Life Cycle approach,
      • Sustainable Urban drainage systems (SUDS)
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone
      • Energy Neutral
      • Other
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Net zero carbon footprint,
      • Carbon-free
      A3P009: OtherEnergy Positive, Low Emission ZonePositive Energy Balance for the demo site
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionImplementation of district level heating system to make heating energy positive and expanding local renewable electricity production.The Rymdgatan's Residential Portfolio in Sweden presents a compelling case study for its classification as a PED-related research, given its alignment with sustainable behaviours and overarching PED development principles as follows: Inclusivity and Social Equity: The residential portfolio situated in Rymdgatan caters primarily to a low-income community. By focusing on this demographic, the project addresses critical aspects of social equity within sustainable urban development. Ensuring access to energy-efficient housing and amenities for economically disadvantaged populations not only fosters social cohesion but also mitigates energy poverty, a pressing concern in many urban contexts. Multifamily Residential Building: The inclusion of multifamily residential buildings within the portfolio underscores a commitment to density and efficient land use, both essential components of sustainable urban design. Such developments promote resource optimisation by consolidating housing units, thereby reducing per capita energy consumption and infrastructure demands. Moreover, multifamily dwellings often facilitate community engagement and shared resource management, fostering a culture of sustainability among residents. Low Carbon Retrofitting and Transition: The overarching initiative to transition the entire Jakobsgårdarna district. The included Rymdgatan portfolio, towards low carbon retrofitting, represents a significant example of decarbonization and climate resilience. By integrating energy-efficient technologies and renewable energy solutions into existing infrastructure, the project not only reduces carbon emissions but also serves as a blueprint for revitalising old urban environments sustainably. This holistic approach to retrofitting demonstrates a systemic commitment to environmental stewardship and long-term sustainability. Climate Adaptation and Renewable Energy Integration: Despite Sweden's climatic challenges, including lower solar resources during winter months, the Rymdgatan project leverages its geographical context to optimize renewable energy utilization. Sweden's greater solar resource availability during summer and geothermal potentials complement the design's emphasis on seasonal energy planning, where surplus energy generated during peak periods can be stored or redistributed efficiently. By embracing climate-responsive design strategies, the project demonstrates resilience in the face of climate variability while harnessing renewable energy potential effectively.Çamlık District, unlike many other districts in Ankara, has a specific urban morphology that draws near the other pilot zones considered by the partners of PED-ACT. The site has three-storey single housing units, along with a fair amount of greenery around. Furthermore, the roof areas enable large amounts of PV installment, which results in higher amounts of local renewable energy potential. Therefore, the district is a good fit for PED development.ExPEDite aims at creating and deploying a novel digital twin, allowing for real-time monitoring, visualization and management of district-level energy flows. Cities consume 65% of the world’s energy supply and are responsible for 70% of the CO² emissions, hence sharing a lot of the responsibility for climate change. We are faced with the challenge of redesigning our existing cities to make them more sustainable, resilient, inclusive and safe. Developing Positive Energy Districts (PEDs), is a breakthrough way to deal with the issue of urban emissions and applying adaptation and mitigation strategies to climate change, while ensuring that these urban areas generate an annual surplus of renewable energy and net zero greenhouse gas emissions. PEDs must address environmental, economic and social issues, providing solutions to energy consumption, production, emissions, transport & mobility and livability. By constantly monitoring and evaluating parameters through existing and/or novel sensor systems (e.g., renewable energy production/supply, transport conditions, air quality, energy demand, meteorological conditions, etc.), unconventional techniques may be applied to provide more sustainable options for the district’s needs.
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentBorlänge city has committed to become the carbon-neutral city by 2030.PED-ACT project.Expected outcome 1 Increased number of (tangible) city planning actions for positive clean energy districts using the (proto-)PED design, development and management digital twin tools (based on pre-market research learnings) using open-standards based components which can be reused elsewhere. 2 Increased integration of existing smaller scale management systems (e.g. Building management systems) with open-standards based operational city platforms using sectorial data (e.g. building data, mobility, urban planning, etc.). 3 Enhanced data gathering approaches with identification of relevant multidimensional data sets (e.g. meteorological, load profile, social, geo-spatial, etc.) high-resolution real-time data streams (e.g. renewable energy production, energy consumption), and relevant forecasting data, drawing also on the work of common European data spaces. 4 Increased number of city planning departments / approaches using common data and (replicable) elements and processes. 5 Consolidated city sensor network specifications, complemented by appropriate data gathering approaches for soft data. 6 Improved performance of AI based self-learning systems for optimization of positive clean energy districts and bottom-up complex models. 7 Enhanced innovation capacity of local/regional administrations and accelerated uptake of shared, smart and sustainable zero emission solutions.
      B1P003: Environment of the case study area
      B2P003: Environment of the case study areaUrban areaUrban areaSuburban areaUrban area
      B1P004: Type of district
      B2P004: Type of district
      • New construction
      • Renovation
      • Renovation
      • New construction
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      • Re-use / Transformation Area
      • Re-use / Transformation Area,
      • Retrofitting Area
      • Retrofitting Area
      • Preservation Area
      • New Development
      B1P006: Year of construction
      B1P006: Year of construction19901986
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential100
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential14000100
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential6
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential100006
      B1P011: Population density before intervention
      B1P011: Population density before intervention000000
      B1P012: Population density after intervention
      B1P012: Population density after intervention0.0413793103448280.0106586224233280000
      B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
      B1P013: Residentialyesyesyesnonono
      B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]436050800
      B1P013: Officeyesnonononono
      B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Industry and Utilityyesnonononono
      B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Commercialnononononono
      B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Institutionalnononononono
      B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Natural areasnononononono
      B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Recreationalnononononono
      B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Dismissed areasyesnonononono
      B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Othernoyesnononono
      B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]706
      B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
      B1P014: Residentialyesyesyesnonoyes
      B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]436050800
      B1P014: Officeyesnonononono
      B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Industry and Utilitynononononono
      B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Commercialyesnonononono
      B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Institutionalnononononono
      B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Natural areasnononononono
      B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Recreationalyesnonononoyes
      B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Dismissed areasnononononono
      B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Othernoyesnononono
      B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]706
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
      B2P002: Installation life time
      B2P002: Installation life time
      B2P003: Scale of action
      B2P003: ScaleDistrict
      B2P004: Operator of the installation
      B2P004: Operator of the installation
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
      B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
      B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?
      B2P006: Other
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      B2P007: Other
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
      B2P008: Other
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      B2P009: Other
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      B2P011: Other
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      B2P016: Execution of operations
      B2P016: Execution of operations
      B2P017: Capacities
      B2P017: Capacities
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P020: External accessibility
      B2P020: External accessibility
      C1P001: Unlocking Factors
      C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
      C1P002: Driving Factors
      C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Economic growth need4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
      C1P003: Administrative barriers
      C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of public participation4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
      C1P004: Policy barriers
      C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
      C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
      C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Non-effective regulations3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples2 - Slightly important4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
      C1P006: Environmental barriers
      C1P006: Environmental barriers2 - Slightly important- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Water Scarcity: 1 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1
      C1P007: Technical barriers
      C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Deficient planning3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Lack of well-defined process3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
      C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
      C1P008: Inertia3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Rebound effect3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
      C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
      C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
      C1P010: Financial barriers
      C1P010: Hidden costs3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Economic crisis4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Risk and uncertainty3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
      C1P011: Market barriers
      C1P011: Split incentives3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Energy price distortion3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
      C1P012: Stakeholders involved
      C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading
      C1P012: Research & Innovation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Planning/leading
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Financial/Funding
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      • None
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
      • Planning/leading,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • None
      • Planning/leading,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Business process management
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      • None
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Urban Services providers
      • Planning/leading,
      • Construction/implementation
      • None
      • Planning/leading,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Real Estate developers
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: Design/Construction companies
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      • None
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Design/demand aggregation
      C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
      • Planning/leading
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Design/demand aggregation
      C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      • None
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: Other
      C1P012: Other (if any)
      Summary

      Authors (framework concept)

      Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

      Contributors (to the content)

      Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

      Implemented by

      Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
      Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

      Join the Action

      PED-EU-NET is an open, interdisciplinary and growing network welcoming academics, practitioners and relevant stakeholders to contribute to the activities of the work plan.
      Join Now

      COST

      COST is an EU funding programme that enables researchers to set up their interdisciplinary research networks in Europe and beyond. We provide funds for organising conferences, meetings, training schools, short scientific exchanges or other networking activities in a wide range of scientific topics. By creating open spaces where people and ideas can grow, we unlock the full potential of science.

      PED-EU-NET

      The COST Action Positive Energy Districts European Network (PED-EU-NET) aims to mobilise researchers and other relevant stakeholders across different domains and sectors to drive the deployment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Europe through open sharing of knowledge, exchange of ideas, pooling of resources, experimentation of new methods and co-creation of novel solutions.

      Action Details

      Grant Holder
      Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome

      Start of Action: 10 September 2020
      End of Action: 09 September 2024
      CSO approval date: 24/03/2020

      © 2021-2023 PED-EU-NET COST Action CA19126. All rights reserved.