Filters:
NameProjectTypeCompare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Uncompare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Uncompare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Uncompare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Uncompare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleGroningen, PED North
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT
Aalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, Denmark
Salzburg, Gneis district
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka
Trenčín
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabGroningen, PED NorthKlimatkontrakt Hyllie, MalmöLubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMATAalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, DenmarkSalzburg, Gneis districtIzmir, District of KarşıyakaTrenčín
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynonononoyesyesyes
PED relevant case studynoyesnoyesnonono
PED Lab.yesnoyesyesnonono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesnoyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusyesnononoyesyesyes
Energy communityyesnononoyesnoyes
Circularityyesnononononono
Air quality and urban comfortnonoyesnoyesyesno
Electrificationnonononononono
Net-zero energy costnononononoyesno
Net-zero emissionyesyesyesnononono
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nonoyesnononoyes
Maximise self-sufficiencynononoyesnoyesno
Othernoyesnonononono
Other (A1P004)Carbon-free; Sustainable neighbourhood
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabImplementation PhaseIn operationImplementation PhasePlanning PhaseCompletedPlanning PhasePlanning Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date12/1801/1111/1911/2201/2010/2206/19
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date12/2312/2311/2501/2410/2511/23
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • GIS open datasets
  • General statistical datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • GIS open datasets
A1P009: OtherOther
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
  • TNO, Hanze, RUG,
  • Ped noord book
  • http://www.ceder.es/redes-inteligentes,
  • O. Izquierdo-Monge, Paula Peña-Carro et al. Conversion of a network section with loads, storage systems and renewable generation sources into a smart microgrid. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(11), 5012. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115012,
  • O. Izquierdo-Monge, Paula Peña-Carro et al. A Methodology for the Conversion of a Network Section with Generation Sources, Storage and Loads into an Electrical Microgrid Based on Raspberry Pi and Home Assistant. ICSC-Cities 2020, CCIS 1359 proceedings. Springer. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69136-3_1
A1P011: Geographic coordinates
X Coordinate (longitude):6.53512112.975181-2.50810.00713.04121627.11004918.046870515442922
Y Coordinate (latitude):53.23484655.56150441.60357.04102847.77101938.49605448.899251380340274
A1P012: Country
A1P012: CountryNetherlandsSwedenSpainDenmarkAustriaTurkeySlovakia
A1P013: City
A1P013: CityGroningenMalmöLubia - SoriaAalborgSalzburgİzmirTrencin
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CfaCfbCfbDfbDfbCsaCfb
A1P015: District boundary
A1P015: District boundaryFunctionalGeographicVirtualGeographicGeographicFunctional
Other
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:MixedMixedPublicPublicMixedPrivateMixed
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple Owners
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED76172110
A1P019: Conditioned space
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]1.011997621027952000
A1P020: Total ground area
A1P020: Total ground area [m²]17.1326400000313080003260075000
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0000030
A1P022: Financial schemes
A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estateyesnononononoyes
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Otheryesnononononono
A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononononoyes
A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingyesnononononono
A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonononononono
A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingyesnononononoyes
A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononoyes
A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUyesnononoyesyesno
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]1193355
A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonoyesyesnoyesno
A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonoyesnononono
A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononono
A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022: Other
A1P023: Economic Targets
A1P023: Economic Targets
  • Boosting local businesses,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
  • Boosting local and sustainable production,
  • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
  • Positive externalities,
  • Boosting local businesses,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
  • Positive externalities,
  • Other
  • Positive externalities,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
  • Boosting local businesses,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
A1P023: OtherBoosting social cooperation and social aid
A1P024: More comments:
A1P024: More comments:The Centre for the Development of Renewable Energy (CEDER)is specialized in applied research, development and promotion of renewable energy. Among the facilities of this Centre, the urban laboratory CEDER-CIEMAT assess the performance of different configurations of energy networks at the district level. This PED-Lab infrastructure is an energy district that connects six office buildings with energy generation installations by means of two energy rings: electrical grid (in operation phase) and thermal network (in the implementation phase). The buildings of this PED Lab can act as energy demanders or suppliers depending on the climatic and operational conditions. The majority of these buildings are constructed with conventional technologies but some of them are implemented with efficient and sustainable measures. The thermal network is composed by two biomass boilers, 300 kW power each, and water tanks with 90 kWh of thermal storage. This network will shortly be expanded with a low temperature (90°C) and high temperature (150°-250°C) rings. The low-temperature ring is made up by two Stirling engine cogeneration boilers (one biomass gasification boiler and one gas boiler). The high-temperature ring has a thermal generator made up of Fresnel solar concentrators and an ORC cogeneration system fed directly from the solar concentrator. The high-temperature ring is interconnected with the low-temperature ring through an oil/water heat exchanger. This network has thermal storage systems in the modalities of: aquifers, boreholes, phase change materials, cold storage with geothermal exchange ground recovery and thermal storage at very low temperature with zeolites. The electrical grid incorporates different renewable generation technologies (50 kW wind turbine and eight different photovoltaic systems, a reversible hydraulic system), and engine generator of 100 kVA, electricity storages (batteries) and flexible loads.
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]0
Contact person for general enquiries
A1P026: NameJasper Tonen, Elisabeth KoopsChristoph GollnerDr. Raquel RamosKristian OlesenAbel MagyariOzlem SenyolVladimír Škola
A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of GroningenFFGCentre for the Development of Renewable Energy (CEDER) - Centre for Energy, Environment and Technology Research (CIEMAT)Aalborg UniversityABUDKarsiyaka MunicipalityCity of Trencin
A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesOtherResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public BodiesOther
A1P028: OtherProject Manager
A1P029: EmailJasper.tonen@groningen.nlchristoph.gollner@ffg.atraquel.ramos@ciemat.esKristian@plan.aau.dkmagyari.abel@abud.huozlemkocaer2@gmail.comvladimir.skola@trencin.sk
Contact person for other special topics
A1P030: NameDr. Oscar SecoAlex Søgaard MorenoStrassl IngeborgHasan Burak CavkaVladimír Škola
A1P031: Emailoscar.seco@ciemat.esasm@aalborg.dkinge.strassl@salzburg.gv.athasancavka@iyte.edu.trvladimir.skola@trencin.sk
Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
A2P001: Fields of application
A2P001: Fields of application
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
  • Waste management
  • Energy production,
  • Waste management
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • Digital technologies,
  • Indoor air quality
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
  • Digital technologies
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.)
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility
A2P001: Other
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streamsEnergy efficiency: - Buildings energy retrofit. Energy production: - Biomass Boiler capacity: 0.6 MW. Annual production: 1.2 GWh - Solar thermal collectors: 70 kW, planned extended to: 0.47MW - Geotermal & Absorption Pumps: 100 kW - Share of renewables after extension: 100% (30% solar thermal and 70% biomass) - AOC 50kW wind turbine. Awaiting installation of a two-way AC-AC converter for subsequent connection to the grid - Bornay Inclin 3 kW wind turbine, connected to 24 Vdc batteries, to be connected to the grid by means of Xantrex inverter/charger - 9kW photovoltaic park (66PV panels, brand BP Solar,type BP5140,of 140W) connected to the grid by means of two INGECON SUN 5 inverters - 5kW photovoltaic pergola (24PV panels, brand Solon, type P200, of 210W) connected to the grid by means of one INGECON SUN 5 inverter - 8.28kW photovoltaic roof (36PV panels, Brand LDK, type LDK-230P-20), connected to the grid by means of one INGECONSUN 10 inverter - 12kW photovoltaic roof (80PV panels, brand Gamesa, type GS-1501), connected to the grid. - Reversible hydraulic system connected to a 60 kW electric generator and a pumping system. -Stirling engine with a heat lamp based on natural gas, a helium cool lamp, 10kWe maximum power delivered and global performance of approximately 33%. Energy flexibility: - Thermal storage systems: water tanks 90kW, aquifers, boreholes, phase change materials, cold storage with geothermal exchange ground recovery and thermal storage at very low temperature with zeolites. - Electrical storage systems: batteries (lead-acid and lithium-ion). - Flexible loads. Control systems and Digital technologies: - Full monitoring campaign. - Smart-meters installation to monitor consumption and suggest another energy behaviours. - Dynamic simulation tools to optimize the energy performance. Urban comfort and air quality: - Meteorological stations to monitor the climate evolution. - Microclimatic simulation tools to quantify the thermal behaviour.Stakeholder engagement, expert energy system analysis, future scenarios- Dynamic district, and building scale energy modelling - Microclimate modelling - Klimaaktiv certification system - Energy community - Flexibility with shared heating and electricity systemsMethods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4). In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED.
A2P003: Application of ISO52000
A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoNoNoYesYes
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesNoNoYes
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNoNoNo
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationMobility, till now, is not included in the energy model.Large combined industrial, residential, and commercial area with complex flows of in- and outgoing traffic.Mobility is not included in the calculations.
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]2.32183.862
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.331481.226
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P011: PVnonoyesnoyesyesno
A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.77706641.028
A2P011: Windnonoyesyesnonono
A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Hydrononoyesnononono
A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_elnonoyesnononono
A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: PVT_elnonononononono
A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Othernononoyesnonono
A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P012: Geothermalyesnoyesnoyesnono
A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Solar Thermalyesnoyesnononono
A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_heatyesnoyesnononono
A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.1
A2P012: Waste heat+HPyesnoyesyesnonono
A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]300
A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: PVT_thyesnononononono
A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonoyesnononono
A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Othernonononononono
A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesGeothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centersVery little wind production currently exists in the area. The electricity production of the waste incineration plant will be included at a later date. Aalborg East is partly a remarkable area for hosting a Portland cement factory that accounts for a substantial share of Denmark’s total CO2 emissions. In turn, it also provides waste heat to the district heating grid for all of Aalborg city and some of the smaller towns that are connected to the same DH grid.
A2P014: Annual energy use
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]6200.8190165.088
A2P015: Annual energy delivered
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]399
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]-1
A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P017: Gasnononononoyesno
A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Coalnonononononono
A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Oilnonononononono
A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Othernononoyesnonono
A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]300
A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P018: PVnononononoyesno
A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.707
A2P018: Windnonononononono
A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Hydrononononononono
A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_elnonononononono
A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Othernonononononono
A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_heatnonononononono
A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Othernonononononono
A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary000001.45403111739750
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]
A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
A2P022: Safety & Security
A2P022: HealthCO2) levels, Predicted Mean Vote,Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied, Temperature, Relative Humidity, Illuminance, Daylight factor, Sound pressure levels
A2P022: Education
A2P022: Mobility
A2P022: EnergyNon-renewable primary energy balance, Renewable energy ratio, Grid Purchase factor, Load cover factor/Self-generation, Supply cover factor/Self-consumption, Net energy/Net power, Peak delivered/exported power, Connection capacity credit, Total greenhouse gas emissions
A2P022: Water
A2P022: Economic developmentInvestment costs, Share of investments covered by grants, Maintenance-related costs, Requirement-related costs, Operation-related costs, Other costs, Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return, Economic Value Added, Payback Period, nZEB Cost Comparison
A2P022: Housing and CommunityAccess to services, Affordability of energy, Affordability of housing, Democratic legitimacy, Living conditions, Social cohesion, Personal safety, Energy consciousness
A2P022: Waste
A2P022: Other
A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesyesyesyesyesyesno
A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsyesyesyesyesnonono
A2P023: Wind Turbinesnonoyesnononono
A2P023: Geothermal energy systemyesyesyesnoyesnono
A2P023: Waste heat recoveryyesyesyesyesnonono
A2P023: Waste to energyyesnonoyesnonono
A2P023: Polygenerationnonoyesnononono
A2P023: Co-generationnonoyesnononono
A2P023: Heat Pumpyesyesyesyesnoyesno
A2P023: Hydrogennonoyesnononono
A2P023: Hydropower plantnonoyesnononono
A2P023: Biomassnonoyesyesnonono
A2P023: Biogasnonononononono
A2P023: Other
A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)yesnoyesnononono
A2P024: Energy management systemyesnoyesyesyesnoyes
A2P024: Demand-side managementyesnoyesyesyesnono
A2P024: Smart electricity gridnonoyesyesyesnono
A2P024: Thermal Storageyesnoyesyesnonoyes
A2P024: Electric Storageyesnoyesyesnonoyes
A2P024: District Heating and Coolingyesyesyesyesnonoyes
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsyesnoyesyesnonono
A2P024: P2P – buildingsnonononoyesnono
A2P024: Other
A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnonoyesyesnoyesyes
A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsyesnononononoyes
A2P025: High-performance new buildingsyesnononoyesnono
A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)yesnononononono
A2P025: Urban data platformsyesnononononono
A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnonononononono
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)nonoyesnoyesyesyes
A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononononono
A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonononononono
A2P025: Smart surveillancenononoyesnonono
A2P025: Other
A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nonononononono
A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)nonononoyesnono
A2P026: e-Mobilityyesnononoyesnono
A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnonononononono
A2P026: Car-free areanonoyesnononono
A2P026: Other
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notesShared mobility: a mobility point will be implemented and ensure the flexible use of different mobility services.SUMP AVAILABLE
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesYesYesYesNo
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance CertificateIn Spain it is mandatory the Energy Performance Certificate in order to buy or rent a house or a dwellingEnergy Performance Certificate
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoYesNo
A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesKlimaaktiv certificate, Greenpass certificate
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • New development strategies,
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Urban Renewal Strategies,
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.)
  • Smart cities strategies,
  • New development strategies,
  • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
  • Smart cities strategies,
  • Urban Renewal Strategies,
  • New development strategies,
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy- Testing the combination of renewable technologies at district level. - Optimization of the generation side based on the weather forecasting and demand side. - Optimization of the control system, connected to the central node, to design and perform virtual analyses based on the combination of all the systems and infrastructures. - Optimization of ICT systems. - Design and management of a virtual analysis - Optimization of efficient measures: building performance, user´s behaviour… - Combination of flexible storage systems to operate the global installation.Reduction of 1018000 tons CO2 by 2030Karşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030. System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023.
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
  • Electrification of Cooking Methods,
  • Biogas
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
  • Biogas,
  • Hydrogen
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
  • Biogas
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
A3P003: OtherSECAP developed in 2023
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities- Create a thermal energy storage tank to be used for air conditioning the buildings. - Some buildings need to be renovated both to increase the energy performance, the seismic behaviour and spaces liveability and comfort. - Optimizing the coupling between technologies. - Guarantee the flexibility to operate the renewable installations to operate in different phases and with different configurations. - CEDER is a public research center and needs to have connected any energy system to the same grid. - CEDER has an industrial develop area where some experimental thermal storage system could be tested.Decarbonize part of Aalborg city as a way of working incrementally towards being a zero-emission city.According to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario.SELF SUSTAINABILITY, SELF EFFICIENCY
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
A3P005: Sustainable behaviourIn Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed.- Minimize the building energy consumption while maintaining indoor comfort levels. - Onsite renewable production with flexible storage elements to fix demand side and generation side. - Flexible control solutions through digitalization systems.- Stakeholder engagement; - Focus on implementing renewable energy production where possible; - Rretrofitting and energy optimization of existing buildings.BASED ON SECAP DEVELOPED IN 2023
A3P006: Economic strategies
A3P006: Economic strategies
  • Innovative business models,
  • Blockchain
  • Demand management Living Lab
  • Life Cycle Cost,
  • Circular economy models
  • Innovative business models,
  • Local trading
A3P006: Other
A3P007: Social models
A3P007: Social models
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Citizen Social Research,
  • Prevention of energy poverty,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
  • Digital Inclusion,
  • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Policy Forums,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
  • Social incentives,
  • Quality of Life,
  • Strategies towards social mix,
  • Affordability,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Affordability
A3P007: Other
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
  • Strategic urban planning,
  • District Energy plans,
  • City Vision 2050,
  • SECAP Updates
  • District Energy plans,
  • Building / district Certification
  • Strategic urban planning,
  • District Energy plans
  • Building / district Certification
  • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
  • District Energy plans,
  • SECAP Updates
A3P008: Other
A3P009: Environmental strategies
A3P009: Environmental strategies
  • Energy Neutral
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone,
  • Pollutants Reduction,
  • Greening strategies
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Net zero carbon footprint
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone,
  • Pollutants Reduction
A3P009: Other
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsAt national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen:  Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation.  Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries.  The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals.  Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricity- European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (Renewable energy directive - 2018/2001/EU and Common rules for the internal electricity market directive- 2019/944/EU). - Spanish building certification is regulated through Royal Decree 235/2013.Current energy tariffs disincentivize both individual and collective PV systems – meaning energy communities are not economically feasible, housing associations and public buildings struggle with finding a secure RoI for solar panels, and citizens and local industry lack an incentive to install solar panels on their own
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionThe large scale provides interesting opportunities for both urban development and strategic energy planning; the diverse mix of buildings and functions also allow for interesting discussions regarding PEDs. Another interesting facet is that the district heating grid is almost fully supplied by waste heat.The pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED).GOOD MIX OF PUBLIC PRIVATE BUILDINGS
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentThe area has an interesting history of development and has recently undergone several urban improvements. This is coupled with a strong local network of business owners and other stakeholders, all with an interest in developing the area in the best way possible. This made for an interesting case from a planning perspective to investigate how this network would pick up on the concept of PED and whether they could see any potential utility in relation to their everyday experiences.Replication of unique PED know how
B1P003: Environment of the case study area
B2P003: Environment of the case study areaSuburban areaRuralSuburban areaSuburban areaUrban areaUrban area
B1P004: Type of district
B2P004: Type of district
  • New construction
  • Renovation
  • New construction
  • Renovation
  • New construction,
  • Renovation
B1P005: Case Study Context
B1P005: Case Study Context
  • New Development
  • Retrofitting Area
  • New Development
  • Retrofitting Area
  • Retrofitting Area
B1P006: Year of construction
B1P006: Year of construction20242005
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential16.931
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P011: Population density before intervention
B1P011: Population density before intervention0000000
B1P012: Population density after intervention
B1P012: Population density after intervention0000000
B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
B1P013: Residentialnononononoyesno
B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]102795
B1P013: Officenonononononono
B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Commercialnonononononono
B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Institutionalnonononononono
B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Natural areasnonononoyesnono
B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Recreationalnonononononono
B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Dismissed areasnonononononono
B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Othernonononononono
B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
B1P014: Residentialnonononoyesyesno
B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]102795
B1P014: Officenonononononono
B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Commercialnonononononono
B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Institutionalnonononononono
B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Natural areasnonononoyesnono
B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Recreationalnonononononono
B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononononono
B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Othernonononononono
B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionGroningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city.An ongoing process and dialogue with local stakeholders to determine the future development of the area.
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P002: Installation life timeThe MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact.CEDER will follow an integrative approach including technology for a permanent installation.No new installation will be made throughout the project. Rather the project will attempt to establish a local PED network with the aim of empowering the stakeholders to better engage with sustainable technologies.
B2P003: Scale of action
B2P003: ScaleDistrictDistrictDistrictDistrict
B2P004: Operator of the installation
B2P004: Operator of the installationThe Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties.CIEMAT. Data detail in contact: mariano.martin@ciemat.es and oscar.izquiedo@ciemat.esKristian Olesen
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materialsGroningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materialsReplication is primarily focused on the establishment of a local network with an interest in and understanding of PED.
B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?NoNoNo
B2P006: Other
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
  • Civic
  • Strategic
  • Civic
B2P007: Other
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipalityResearch center/UniversityResearch center/University
B2P008: Other
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
  • Academia,
  • Private,
  • Industrial,
  • Other
  • Academia,
  • Industrial
  • Academia,
  • Private
B2P009: Otherresearch companies, monitoring company, ict company
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activitiesThe operation of the laboratory with all the components of the energy networks requires a collaborative work between various departments and entities. On the one hand, it is necessary to optimize the operation of renewable systems based on the weather conditions, forecast of the demand side and the flexibility of the generation systems. On the other hand, the optimization of the energy demands through a more sustainable behaviour of both the building and the users want to be acquired. For this, it is necessary to take into account technical aspects but also market, comfort and encourage the user participation, creating a decision-making matrix that allows optimizing the operation of the global system.
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
  • Buildings,
  • Demand-side management,
  • Energy storage,
  • Energy networks,
  • Waste management,
  • Lighting,
  • E-mobility,
  • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
  • Social interactions,
  • Business models
  • Buildings,
  • Demand-side management,
  • Prosumers,
  • Renewable generation,
  • Energy storage,
  • Energy networks,
  • Efficiency measures,
  • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
  • Ambient measures,
  • Social interactions
B2P011: Other
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
  • Tools for prototyping and modelling
  • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
  • Tools for prototyping and modelling
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P014: Monitoring measures
  • Execution plan,
  • Available data,
  • Type of measured data,
  • Equipment,
  • Level of access
  • Equipment
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
  • Energy,
  • Social,
  • Economical / Financial
  • Energy,
  • Environmental,
  • Economical / Financial
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P017: Capacities
B2P017: Capacities- Innovative grid configuration to connect bio boilers and solar thermal on buildings. - Environmental & air quality evaluation. - Testing and evaluation of high efficient heating & cooling systems: Gas, biomass, geothermal and absorption H&C pumps … - Definition and implementation of the different regulation modes for the global system. Using the data from the research focused-partners, several regulation modes for the DH network could be defined and implemented in order to obtain an optimal operation of the network. - Innovation in MPC control to enable harvesting 100% renewables in the most efficient way. - Physical integration of the technologies with the existing facilities at the living lab. - Connection between the solar thermal collectors to achieve the lowest heat losses, providing the possibility to use the grid as high or low temperature DH, according to the demand schedule of the buildings. - Test the bio-boiler of the last generation and ultra-low emissions biomass condensing boiler in order to increase efficiency and reduce GHG and air pollutant emissions of the DH plant. - Control of the supply temperature of the DH grid to enable 100% renewables harvesting in the most efficient way. - Research of the incidence of a normal building or a bioclimatic building in the DH grid demand. - Methodologies for concept validation: Definition of the minimum requirements to verify the suitability of the solutions proposed. - Tests campaign: Experimental operation and characterization in a relevant environment, to exploit the technologies at their best and test different demand profiles, different configuration and loads, with real time monitoring and continuous commissioning to control the performance of the technology. - Validation and upgrading recommendation for the DH&C at district level. - Evaluation of innovation actions for potential energy interventions with demand response in buildings. - The complete available infrastructure (MV and LV electric systems, transformation hubs, end consumption, generation sources, communication elements, etc.) belongs to CEDER-CIEMAT, making this the perfect scenario to test and try the performance of “Smart Grid” and “Microgrid” projects. - The type of electric grid, its voltage levels (MV or LV), its variety of real loads (different buildings with different profiles: industrial buildings, offices and so on) and its sources of renewable generation and storage, mean it is ideal for intermediate tests between a small-scale laboratory and final deployment of the real product.
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P018: Relations with stakeholdersCEDER - CIEMAT is a public research body assigned to the Ministry of Science and Innovation under the General Secretariat for Research, focusing on energy and environment. To develop this lab CIEMAT has relations with private renewable companies, research centers and academia institutions.
B2P019: Available tools
B2P019: Available tools
  • Energy modelling,
  • Social models,
  • Business and financial models
  • Energy modelling
B2P019: Available tools
B2P020: External accessibility
B2P020: External accessibilityCIEMAT is a public body, so it´s open to any institution according the actual regulation and agreements.
C1P001: Unlocking Factors
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
C1P002: Driving Factors
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)Earthquakes due to gas extraction
C1P003: Administrative barriers
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
C1P004: Policy barriers
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Non-effective regulations3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P006: Environmental barriers3 - Moderately important- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 - Water Scarcity: 1
C1P007: Technical barriers
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Deficient planning2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
C1P008: Inertia2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Rebound effect2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
C1P010: Financial barriers
C1P010: Hidden costs2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
C1P011: Market barriers
C1P011: Split incentives5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Energy price distortion4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
C1P012: Stakeholders involved
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Research & Innovation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: Financial/Funding
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • None
C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Business process management
  • Planning/leading
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Urban Services providers
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading
C1P012: Real Estate developers
  • Construction/implementation
  • None
C1P012: Design/Construction companies
  • Construction/implementation
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
  • None
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • None
C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Other
C1P012: Other (if any)
Summary

Authors (framework concept)

Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

Contributors (to the content)

Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

Implemented by

Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)