Search
Close this search box.
Search
Map View
Table View
Projects
Filters:
Clear Filters Export All Entries (CSV)
NameProjectTypeCompare
Örebro-Vivalla JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Texel JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Hällefors, Sweden JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lecce, SmartEnCity SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Firenze, Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Uncompare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Uncompare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleGroningen, PED North
Fornebu, Bærum
«×»
Texel
«×»
Vidin, Himik and Bononia
«×»
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park
«×»
Ankara, Çamlık District
«×»
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland
«×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabGroningen, PED NorthFornebu, BærumTexelVidin, Himik and BononiaUtrecht, Utrecht Science ParkAnkara, Çamlık DistrictUtrecht, Kanaleneiland
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynoyesnoyesnoyesno
PED relevant case studynonoyesnoyesyesyes
PED Lab.yesnononononono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusyesnoyesyesnoyesno
Energy communityyesnononoyesyesyes
Circularityyesnononononono
Air quality and urban comfortnonononononono
Electrificationnonoyesnoyesyesyes
Net-zero energy costnonononoyesyesno
Net-zero emissionyesyesnononoyesno
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nonononononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynononononoyesno
Othernoyesnonoyesnono
Other (A1P004)Sustainable neighbourhood; Energy efficientminimise grid-congestion problems
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabImplementation PhaseCompletedPlanning PhasePlanning PhaseImplementation PhasePlanning PhasePlanning Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date12/1801/1804/2412/1802/2410/2211/23
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date12/2312/2312/2612/3012/3009/2511/26
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
  • TNO, Hanze, RUG,
  • Ped noord book
        A1P011: Geographic coordinates
        X Coordinate (longitude):6.53512110.6114074.822.88265.1763231794933732.7953695.0875
        Y Coordinate (latitude):53.23484659.89898553.0543.993652.0845691539.88181252.0653
        A1P012: Country
        A1P012: CountryNetherlandsNorwayNetherlandsBulgariaNetherlandsTurkeyNetherlands
        A1P013: City
        A1P013: CityGroningenBærumTexelVidinUtrechtAnkaraUtrecht (Kanaleneiland)
        A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
        A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CfaDfbCfbCfaCfbDsbCfb
        A1P015: District boundary
        A1P015: District boundaryFunctionalGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographic
        Other
        A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
        A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:MixedMixedPrivateMixedMixedPrivatePrivate
        A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
        A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersSingle OwnerSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple Owners
        A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
        A1P018: Number of buildings in PED774257
        A1P019: Conditioned space
        A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]1.0198759.5322600
        A1P020: Total ground area
        A1P020: Total ground area [m²]17.13241269195234.803000000508002910000
        A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
        A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0001000
        A1P022: Financial schemes
        A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estateyesnononononono
        A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
        A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Otheryesnononononono
        A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononononono
        A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingyesnonoyesyesnoyes
        A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonononononono
        A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingyesnononononono
        A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononono
        A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUyesnonononoyesno
        A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonoyesnonoyesno
        A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]321597
        A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonononononono
        A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononono
        A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022: Other
        A1P023: Economic Targets
        A1P023: Economic Targets
        • Boosting local businesses,
        • Boosting local and sustainable production
        • Boosting local and sustainable production
        A1P023: Other
        A1P024: More comments:
        A1P024: More comments:The urban morphology of Çamlık District differs in several ways, compared with the typical urban fabric in Türkiye, along with the capital city of Ankara. The houses on the site are composed of three-story attached single-housing units with multiple rows, creating a total of 257 housing units in total. Low-rise buildings coupled with suitably oriented rooftop surfaces brings about significant advantages in the site. Dense greenery in the site also results in reduced cooling energy demand in the buildings.
        A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
        A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]
        Contact person for general enquiries
        A1P026: NameJasper Tonen, Elisabeth KoopsChristoph GollnerLuis Ramirez CamargoDaniela KostovaSara Herreras MartinezProf. Dr. İpek Gürsel DİNODr. Gonçalo Homem De Almeida Rodriguez Correia
        A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of GroningenFFGUtrecht UniversityGreen Synergy ClusterUniversity of Applied Science UtrechtMiddle East Technical UniversityDelft University of Technology
        A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesOtherResearch Center / UniversityOtherResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / University
        A1P028: OtherCluster
        A1P029: EmailJasper.tonen@groningen.nlchristoph.gollner@ffg.atl.e.ramirezcamargo@uu.nldaniela@greensynergycluster.euSara.herrerasmartinez@hu.nlipekg@metu.edu.trg.correia@tudelft.nl
        Contact person for other special topics
        A1P030: NameMitali JoshiAssoc. Prof. Onur TaylanQiaochu Fan
        A1P031: Emailm.y.joshi@uu.nlotaylan@metu.edu.trq.fan-1@tudelft.nl
        Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
        A2P001: Fields of application
        A2P001: Fields of application
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production,
        • E-mobility,
        • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
        • Waste management
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy production,
        • E-mobility
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production,
        • E-mobility
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy production
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy production,
        • Construction materials
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • E-mobility,
        • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
        • Digital technologies
        A2P001: Other
        A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
        A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streamsThe energy consumption and efficiency of the energy model of Çamlık Site, created using EnergyPlus software, have been evaluated under the scenarios specified below. At each stage, a new system was incorporated to explore the potential of the area becoming a PED. In this context, four scenarios were created to compare different energy scenarios for the Ankara pilot area and to observe the impact of the included systems on energy efficiency: V_base; V_ER; V_ER,HP; V_ER,HP,PV. The basic scenario (V_base) was created using the current state without any improvement to the building envelope. This scenario was developed to determine the annual energy needs of the entire site without any intervention and serves as a reference point for the other developed models. The second scenario (V_ER) was created to improve the building envelopes of all residential units in the area, altering the U-values according to Türkiye's current building standards (TS-825). The third scenario (V_ER,HP) primarily includes a heat pump model that can use electrical energy to produce higher thermal energy and is added on top of the improvements in the second scenario. Finally, the V_ER,HP,PV scenario combines building envelope improvements, the heat pump, and the solar PV system.
        A2P003: Application of ISO52000
        A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoNoYes
        A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
        A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoYes
        A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
        A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesNo
        A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
        A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationMobility, till now, is not included in the energy model.Mobility is not included in the calculations.
        A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
        A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]2.30.7193.446
        A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
        A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.330.1921800.528
        A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
        A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]2.35
        A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
        A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
        A2P011: PVnononononoyesno
        A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]3.4240
        A2P011: Windnonononononono
        A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Hydrononononononono
        A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Biomass_elnonononononono
        A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
        A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: PVT_elnonononononono
        A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Othernonononononono
        A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
        A2P012: Geothermalyesnononononono
        A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Solar Thermalyesnononononono
        A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Biomass_heatyesnononononono
        A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.1
        A2P012: Waste heat+HPyesnononononono
        A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
        A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: PVT_thyesnononononono
        A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
        A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Othernonononononono
        A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
        A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesGeothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centers
        A2P014: Annual energy use
        A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]3.976
        A2P015: Annual energy delivered
        A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]
        A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
        A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
        A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
        A2P017: Gasnononononoyesno
        A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
        A2P017: Coalnonononononono
        A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
        A2P017: Oilnonononononono
        A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
        A2P017: Othernonononononono
        A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
        A2P018: PVnonononononono
        A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Windnonononononono
        A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Hydrononononononono
        A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Biomass_elnonononononono
        A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
        A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
        A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Othernonononononono
        A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
        A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
        A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
        A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Biomass_heatnonononononono
        A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
        A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
        A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
        A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
        A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Othernonononononono
        A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
        A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary0000000
        A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
        A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]
        A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
        A2P022: Safety & Security
        A2P022: Health
        A2P022: Education
        A2P022: MobilityMode of transport; Access to public transportYesImproved accessibility to V2G-related transport options, focusing on inclusivity and equitable adoption in urban districts
        A2P022: EnergyEnergy efficiency in buildings (Net energy need; Gross energy need; Total energy need)YesTarget zero greenhouse gas emissions through the adoption of EVs with V2G capabilities, aiming to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and enhance local grid stability
        A2P022: Water
        A2P022: Economic developmentDevelopment of viable business models for V2G that allow decentralized energy markets to integrate with the grid, enhancing local economic resilience
        A2P022: Housing and CommunityDelivery and proximity to amenities
        A2P022: Waste
        A2P022: OtherGHG emissions; Power/load; Life cycle cost (LCC); Demographic needs and consultation plan; Public Space
        A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
        A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
        A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsyesnoyesnononono
        A2P023: Wind Turbinesnonononononoyes
        A2P023: Geothermal energy systemyesnonoyesyesnono
        A2P023: Waste heat recoveryyesnononononono
        A2P023: Waste to energyyesnononononono
        A2P023: Polygenerationnonononononono
        A2P023: Co-generationnonononononono
        A2P023: Heat Pumpyesnoyesyesyesyesno
        A2P023: Hydrogennonononononono
        A2P023: Hydropower plantnonononononono
        A2P023: Biomassnonononononono
        A2P023: Biogasnonononononono
        A2P023: Other
        A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
        A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)yesnononononono
        A2P024: Energy management systemyesnononoyesnoyes
        A2P024: Demand-side managementyesnoyesnononono
        A2P024: Smart electricity gridnonononononoyes
        A2P024: Thermal Storageyesnononoyesnono
        A2P024: Electric Storageyesnonoyesnonoyes
        A2P024: District Heating and Coolingyesnoyesnoyesnono
        A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsyesnononononono
        A2P024: P2P – buildingsnonononononono
        A2P024: Other
        A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
        A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnonoyesyesyesyesyes
        A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsyesnononononono
        A2P025: High-performance new buildingsyesnononononono
        A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)yesnononononoyes
        A2P025: Urban data platformsyesnononononoyes
        A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnonononononono
        A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)nononononoyesno
        A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononononono
        A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonononononono
        A2P025: Smart surveillancenonononononono
        A2P025: Other
        A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
        A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nonononononoyes
        A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)nonononononoyes
        A2P026: e-Mobilityyesnononononoyes
        A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnonononononono
        A2P026: Car-free areanonononononono
        A2P026: Other
        A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
        A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notesThe Fornebu area will contain urban structures that will facilitate low and zero carbon mobility within the area, including pedestrian walking, bicycling and electrical vehicles.
        A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
        A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesNo
        A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance Certificate
        A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
        A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesYesNo
        A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesAll buildings should be certified according to BREEAM-NOR Excellent
        A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
        A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
        • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
        • New development strategies,
        • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
        • Smart cities strategies
        • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
        • New development strategies
        • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
        • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
        A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
        A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
        A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
        A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
        • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
        • Electrification of Cooking Methods,
        • Biogas
        • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
        A3P003: Other
        A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
        A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesAccording to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary with heat pumps. Rooftop photovoltaic panels also have the potential for renewable energy generation. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity through this scenario.
        A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
        A3P005: Sustainable behaviourIn Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed.
        A3P006: Economic strategies
        A3P006: Economic strategies
        • Innovative business models,
        • Blockchain
        • Innovative business models,
        • Local trading,
        • Existing incentives
        A3P006: Other
        A3P007: Social models
        A3P007: Social models
        • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
        • Citizen Social Research,
        • Prevention of energy poverty,
        • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
        • Citizen Social Research
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
        • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
        • Quality of Life,
        • Prevention of energy poverty
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
        • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
        • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
        • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
        • Affordability
        • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
        • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
        • Social incentives,
        • Prevention of energy poverty,
        • Digital Inclusion
        A3P007: Other
        A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
        A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
        • Strategic urban planning,
        • District Energy plans,
        • City Vision 2050,
        • SECAP Updates
        • Strategic urban planning,
        • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
        • City Vision 2050,
        • Building / district Certification
        • Strategic urban planning,
        • City Vision 2050,
        • SECAP Updates
        • District Energy plans
        • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
        • District Energy plans
        • Strategic urban planning,
        • District Energy plans
        A3P008: Other
        A3P009: Environmental strategies
        A3P009: Environmental strategies
        • Energy Neutral
        • Energy Neutral,
        • Net zero carbon footprint,
        • Carbon-free
        • Energy Neutral
        • Pollutants Reduction,
        • Greening strategies
        • Energy Neutral
        • Energy Neutral,
        • Low Emission Zone
        • Energy Neutral,
        • Low Emission Zone,
        • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
        A3P009: OtherEnergy Positive, Low Emission Zone
        A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
        A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsAt national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen:  Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation.  Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries.  The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals.  Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricity
        B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
        B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionÇamlık District, unlike many other districts in Ankara, has a specific urban morphology that draws near the other pilot zones considered by the partners of PED-ACT. The site has three-storey single housing units, along with a fair amount of greenery around. Furthermore, the roof areas enable large amounts of PV installment, which results in higher amounts of local renewable energy potential. Therefore, the district is a good fit for PED development.
        B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
        B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentPED-ACT project.
        B1P003: Environment of the case study area
        B2P003: Environment of the case study areaUrban areaSuburban area
        B1P004: Type of district
        B2P004: Type of district
        • New construction
        • Renovation
        • Renovation
        B1P005: Case Study Context
        B1P005: Case Study Context
        • New Development
        • Retrofitting Area
        • Retrofitting Area
        B1P006: Year of construction
        B1P006: Year of construction1986
        B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
        B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
        B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
        B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
        B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
        B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
        B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
        B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
        B1P011: Population density before intervention
        B1P011: Population density before intervention0000000
        B1P012: Population density after intervention
        B1P012: Population density after intervention0000000
        B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
        B1P013: Residentialnononoyesnoyesno
        B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]64 787,5750800
        B1P013: Officenonononononono
        B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
        B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Commercialnononoyesnonono
        B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]262,33
        B1P013: Institutionalnonononononono
        B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Natural areasnonononononono
        B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Recreationalnonononononono
        B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Dismissed areasnonononononono
        B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Othernonononononono
        B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
        B1P014: Residentialnoyesnononoyesno
        B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]50800
        B1P014: Officenonononononono
        B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
        B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Commercialnonononononono
        B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Institutionalnononoyesnonono
        B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]35322.21
        B1P014: Natural areasnonononononono
        B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Recreationalnoyesnonononono
        B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononononono
        B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Othernonononononono
        B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
        B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionGroningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city.
        B2P002: Installation life time
        B2P002: Installation life timeThe MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact.
        B2P003: Scale of action
        B2P003: ScaleDistrictDistrict
        B2P004: Operator of the installation
        B2P004: Operator of the installationThe Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties.
        B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
        B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materialsGroningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materials
        B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
        B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?No
        B2P006: Other
        B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
        B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
        • Civic
        B2P007: Other
        B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
        B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipality
        B2P008: Other
        B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
        B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
        • Academia,
        • Private,
        • Industrial,
        • Other
        B2P009: Otherresearch companies, monitoring company, ict company
        B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
        B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
        B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
        B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
        • Buildings,
        • Demand-side management,
        • Energy storage,
        • Energy networks,
        • Waste management,
        • Lighting,
        • E-mobility,
        • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
        • Social interactions,
        • Business models
        B2P011: Other
        B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
        B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
        • Tools for prototyping and modelling
        B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
        B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
        B2P014: Monitoring measures
        B2P014: Monitoring measures
        • Execution plan,
        • Available data,
        • Type of measured data,
        • Equipment,
        • Level of access
        B2P015: Key Performance indicators
        B2P015: Key Performance indicators
        • Energy,
        • Social,
        • Economical / Financial
        B2P016: Execution of operations
        B2P016: Execution of operations
        B2P017: Capacities
        B2P017: Capacities
        B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
        B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
        B2P019: Available tools
        B2P019: Available tools
        • Energy modelling,
        • Social models,
        • Business and financial models
        B2P019: Available tools
        B2P020: External accessibility
        B2P020: External accessibility
        C1P001: Unlocking Factors
        C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
        C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important
        C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
        C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important
        C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important
        C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
        C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
        C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
        C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
        C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important
        C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
        C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)Grid congestion which limits electrification possibilities
        C1P002: Driving Factors
        C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
        C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
        C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
        C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important
        C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)Earthquakes due to gas extraction
        C1P003: Administrative barriers
        C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important
        C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
        C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
        C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
        C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
        C1P004: Policy barriers
        C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
        C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)Financial cuts announced to high-education institutes announced by the Dutch government might affect sustainability plans or key organisation of the PED project
        C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
        C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
        C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P005: Non-effective regulations3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
        C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
        C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important
        C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
        C1P006: Environmental barriers
        C1P006: Environmental barriers- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Water Scarcity: 1 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1
        C1P007: Technical barriers
        C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P007: Deficient planning2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important
        C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P007: Lack of well-defined process3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important
        C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
        C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
        C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
        C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
        C1P008: Inertia2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
        C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
        C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
        C1P008: Rebound effect2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
        C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
        C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
        C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
        C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
        C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
        C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
        C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
        C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
        C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
        C1P010: Financial barriers
        C1P010: Hidden costs2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P010: Risk and uncertainty3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important
        C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
        C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
        C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
        C1P011: Market barriers
        C1P011: Split incentives5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P011: Energy price distortion4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
        C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
        C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
        C1P012: Stakeholders involved
        C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Research & Innovation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • None
        C1P012: Financial/Funding
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • None
        C1P012: Business process management
        • Planning/leading
        • None
        C1P012: Urban Services providers
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Real Estate developers
        • Construction/implementation
        C1P012: Design/Construction companies
        • Construction/implementation
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
        • None
        • Construction/implementation
        C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • Design/demand aggregation
        C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        C1P012: Other
        C1P012: Other (if any)
        Summary

        Authors (framework concept)

        Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

        Contributors (to the content)

        Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

        Implemented by

        Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
        Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

        Join the Action

        PED-EU-NET is an open, interdisciplinary and growing network welcoming academics, practitioners and relevant stakeholders to contribute to the activities of the work plan.
        Join Now

        COST

        COST is an EU funding programme that enables researchers to set up their interdisciplinary research networks in Europe and beyond. We provide funds for organising conferences, meetings, training schools, short scientific exchanges or other networking activities in a wide range of scientific topics. By creating open spaces where people and ideas can grow, we unlock the full potential of science.

        PED-EU-NET

        The COST Action Positive Energy Districts European Network (PED-EU-NET) aims to mobilise researchers and other relevant stakeholders across different domains and sectors to drive the deployment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Europe through open sharing of knowledge, exchange of ideas, pooling of resources, experimentation of new methods and co-creation of novel solutions.

        Action Details

        Grant Holder
        Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome

        Start of Action: 10 September 2020
        End of Action: 09 September 2024
        CSO approval date: 24/03/2020

        © 2021-2023 PED-EU-NET COST Action CA19126. All rights reserved.