Filters:
NameProjectTypeCompare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleGroningen, PED North
Vantaa, Aviapolis
Ankara, Çamlık District
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau
Aalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, Denmark
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabGroningen, PED NorthVantaa, AviapolisAnkara, Çamlık DistrictDietenbach, Freiburg im BreisgauAalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, DenmarkStor-Elvdal, Campus EvenstadBorlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynoyesyesnononono
PED relevant case studynoyesyesyesyesyesyes
PED Lab.yesyesnonoyesnono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusyesnoyesnonoyesyes
Energy communityyesnoyesnononoyes
Circularityyesyesnonononono
Air quality and urban comfortnonononononono
Electrificationnonoyesnononoyes
Net-zero energy costnonoyesnononono
Net-zero emissionyesnoyesnononono
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nonononononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynonoyesnoyesnoyes
Othernononoyesnoyesno
Other (A1P004)Sustainable neighbourhoodEnergy-flexibility
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabImplementation PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhaseIn operationPlanning Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date12/1801/2310/2201/1211/2201/13
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date12/2312/2709/2511/2512/24
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • GIS open datasets
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
  • TNO, Hanze, RUG,
  • Ped noord book
    A1P011: Geographic coordinates
    X Coordinate (longitude):6.53512124.95882132.7953697.79547610.00711.07877077353174615.394495
    Y Coordinate (latitude):53.23484660.30548839.88181248.00615757.04102861.4260442039911260.486609
    A1P012: Country
    A1P012: CountryNetherlandsFinlandTurkeyGermanyDenmarkNorwaySweden
    A1P013: City
    A1P013: CityGroningenVantaaAnkaraFreiburg im BreisgauAalborgEvenstad, Stor-Elvdal municipalityBorlänge
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CfaDfbDsbCfbDfbDwcDsb
    A1P015: District boundary
    A1P015: District boundaryFunctionalGeographicGeographicVirtualGeographicGeographic
    Other
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:MixedMixedPrivatePublicPublicPublicMixed
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerSingle Owner
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED72572210
    A1P019: Conditioned space
    A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]1.0122600100003700
    A1P020: Total ground area
    A1P020: Total ground area [m²]17.132388100050800313080009945
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0000000
    A1P022: Financial schemes
    A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estateyesyesnonononono
    A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
    A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Otheryesyesnonononono
    A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononononono
    A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingyesnonononoyesno
    A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonononononono
    A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingyesyesnonononono
    A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononono
    A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUyesyesyesnononono
    A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonoyesnoyesyesno
    A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonononononono
    A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononono
    A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022: OtherMultiple different funding schemes depending on the development site within the District and Lab.
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
    A1P023: Other
    A1P024: More comments:
    A1P024: More comments:The urban morphology of Çamlık District differs in several ways, compared with the typical urban fabric in Türkiye, along with the capital city of Ankara. The houses on the site are composed of three-story attached single-housing units with multiple rows, creating a total of 257 housing units in total. Low-rise buildings coupled with suitably oriented rooftop surfaces brings about significant advantages in the site. Dense greenery in the site also results in reduced cooling energy demand in the buildings.
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]
    Contact person for general enquiries
    A1P026: NameJasper Tonen, Elisabeth KoopsEira LinkoProf. Dr. İpek Gürsel DİNOChristoph GollnerKristian OlesenÅse Lekang SørensenJingchun Shen
    A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of GroningenCity of VantaaMiddle East Technical UniversityFFGAalborg UniversitySINTEF / The Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods (ZEN) in Smart CitiesHögskolan Dalarna
    A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityOtherResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / University
    A1P028: Other
    A1P029: EmailJasper.tonen@groningen.nleira.linko@vantaa.fiipekg@metu.edu.trchristoph.gollner@ffg.atKristian@plan.aau.dkase.sorensen@sintef.nojih@du.se
    Contact person for other special topics
    A1P030: NameAssoc. Prof. Onur TaylanAlex Søgaard MorenoXingxing Zhang
    A1P031: Emailotaylan@metu.edu.trasm@aalborg.dkxza@du.se
    Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
    A2P001: Fields of application
    A2P001: Fields of application
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
    • Waste management
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
    • Digital technologies,
    • Construction materials,
    • Other
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy production,
    • Construction materials
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy production,
    • Indoor air quality
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
    • Digital technologies
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Digital technologies,
    • Construction materials
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Construction materials
    A2P001: Other
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streamsPilot collaboration with landowners. Carbon footprint assessment and planning guidelines in zoning planning. Green infrastructure requirements. Examples of considered energy solutions: waste heat recovery and utilization, geothermal, air-water heat pumps, district heating return water, photovoltaics, A-class energy efficiency, smart control and monitoring, energy storages, E-mobility above national requirements, coolingThe energy consumption and efficiency of the energy model of Çamlık Site, created using EnergyPlus software, have been evaluated under the scenarios specified below. At each stage, a new system was incorporated to explore the potential of the area becoming a PED. In this context, four scenarios were created to compare different energy scenarios for the Ankara pilot area and to observe the impact of the included systems on energy efficiency: V_base; V_ER; V_ER,HP; V_ER,HP,PV. The basic scenario (V_base) was created using the current state without any improvement to the building envelope. This scenario was developed to determine the annual energy needs of the entire site without any intervention and serves as a reference point for the other developed models. The second scenario (V_ER) was created to improve the building envelopes of all residential units in the area, altering the U-values according to Türkiye's current building standards (TS-825). The third scenario (V_ER,HP) primarily includes a heat pump model that can use electrical energy to produce higher thermal energy and is added on top of the improvements in the second scenario. Finally, the V_ER,HP,PV scenario combines building envelope improvements, the heat pump, and the solar PV system.Stakeholder engagement, expert energy system analysis, future scenariosCampus Evenstad is a small department at Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, with 220 students. The vision for Campus Evenstad is an energy-flexible Campus Evenstad in an emission-free Europe. The area consists of approx. 20 buildings managed and owned by Statsbygg; the Norwegian government’s building commissioner, property manager and developer. The oldest building is from the 1700-century and the newest is the administration centre (2017) which is a Zero Emission Building (ZEB) with the highest ambitions (ZEB-COM). Their concept has been to realize Campus Evenstad as an energy pilot, where innovative energy solutions are demonstrated, showing how local areas can become more self-sufficient in energy. The energy system at Evenstad consists of several innovative energy solutions that are new in a Norwegian and European context. They are combined in local infrastructure for electricity and heat, which has led to new knowledge and learning about how the solutions work together, and how the interaction is between the local and the national energy system. The solutions consist of solar cells (PV), solar collectors, combined heat and power plant (CHP) based on wood chips, biofuel boiler, electric boiler, grid connection, district heating, heat storage, stationary battery and bidirectional electric vehicle (EV) charging (V2G). Statsbygg has gained a lot of operational experience from Campus Evenstad - both from individual technologies and from the interaction between these, which benefits Statsbygg's 2,200 buildings and 3 million m2 around Norway. Sharing of experiences is central. Campus Evenstad is a pilot in the Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods (ZEN) in Smart Cities were several of the solutions has been developed and studied.Load calculation and system optimisation: City Energy Analyst Identification of stranded assets for asset owners and investors to understand the carbon risks: CRREM
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoNoYesNoNoNo
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesNoYesYes
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNoYesNo
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationMobility, till now, is not included in the energy model.The calculation of the energy balance will be further developed and specified under the Neutralpath-project. Mobility related emissions are taken into account in the carbon footprint calculation of each zoning plan in the development area.Mobility is not included in the calculations.Large combined industrial, residential, and commercial area with complex flows of in- and outgoing traffic.At Campus Evenstad there is infrastructure for EV charging and bidirectional charging (V2G). EV charging is included in the energy balance.
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]2.33.4462180.770.6777
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.330.5281480.760.03656
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]0
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]0
    A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P011: PVnoyesyesnonoyesno
    A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]3.42400.065
    A2P011: Windnonononoyesnono
    A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Hydrononononononono
    A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Biomass_elnononononoyesno
    A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.050
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: PVT_elnonononononoyes
    A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.01818
    A2P011: Othernonononoyesnono
    A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P012: Geothermalyesyesnonononono
    A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Solar Thermalyesnonononoyesno
    A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.045
    A2P012: Biomass_heatyesnonononoyesno
    A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.10.35
    A2P012: Waste heat+HPyesyesnonoyesnono
    A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]300
    A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: PVT_thyesnononononoyes
    A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.0825
    A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Othernonononononono
    A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesGeothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centersVery little wind production currently exists in the area. The electricity production of the waste incineration plant will be included at a later date. Aalborg East is partly a remarkable area for hosting a Portland cement factory that accounts for a substantial share of Denmark’s total CO2 emissions. In turn, it also provides waste heat to the district heating grid for all of Aalborg city and some of the smaller towns that are connected to the same DH grid.Listed values are measurements from 2018. Renewable energy share is increasing.
    A2P014: Annual energy use
    A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]3.9766201.5000.318
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]39910.2055
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
    A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P017: Gasnonoyesnononono
    A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Coalnonononononono
    A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Oilnonononononono
    A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Othernonononoyesnoyes
    A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]3000
    A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P018: PVnoyesnonononono
    A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Windnoyesnonononono
    A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Hydronoyesnonononono
    A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_elnoyesnonononono
    A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
    A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
    A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Othernonononononoyes
    A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.187
    A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
    A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
    A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_heatnoyesnonononono
    A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Waste heat+HPnoyesnonononono
    A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
    A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Othernonononononoyes
    A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary0000000.53839572192513
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]6.93
    A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
    A2P022: Safety & Securitynone
    A2P022: Healththermal comfort diagram
    A2P022: Educationnone
    A2P022: Mobilitynone
    A2P022: Energynormalized CO2/GHG & Energy intensity
    A2P022: Water
    A2P022: Economic developmentcost of excess emissions
    A2P022: Housing and Community
    A2P022: Waste
    A2P022: Other
    A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
    A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
    A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsyesnonoyesyesyesyes
    A2P023: Wind Turbinesnonononononono
    A2P023: Geothermal energy systemyesyesnonononoyes
    A2P023: Waste heat recoveryyesyesnonoyesnoyes
    A2P023: Waste to energyyesyesnonoyesnono
    A2P023: Polygenerationnoyesnonononono
    A2P023: Co-generationnononononoyesno
    A2P023: Heat Pumpyesyesyesyesyesnoyes
    A2P023: Hydrogennonononononono
    A2P023: Hydropower plantnonononononono
    A2P023: Biomassnoyesnonoyesyesno
    A2P023: Biogasnonononononono
    A2P023: OtherThe technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case.The Co-generation is biomass based.
    A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
    A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)yesyesnononoyesyes
    A2P024: Energy management systemyesyesnonoyesyesno
    A2P024: Demand-side managementyesyesnonoyesyesno
    A2P024: Smart electricity gridnoyesnonoyesnono
    A2P024: Thermal Storageyesyesnoyesyesyesyes
    A2P024: Electric Storageyesyesnonoyesyesno
    A2P024: District Heating and Coolingyesyesnonoyesyesyes
    A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsyesyesnonoyesyesno
    A2P024: P2P – buildingsnonononononono
    A2P024: OtherThe technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case.Bidirectional electric vehicle (EV) charging (V2G)
    A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
    A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnonoyesnoyesnoyes
    A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsyesnononononono
    A2P025: High-performance new buildingsyesyesnononoyesno
    A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)yesnononononono
    A2P025: Urban data platformsyesnononononono
    A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnonononononono
    A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)noyesyesnononoyes
    A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononononono
    A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonononononono
    A2P025: Smart surveillancenonononoyesnono
    A2P025: OtherThe technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case.
    A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
    A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)noyesnonononono
    A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)noyesnoyesnonono
    A2P026: e-Mobilityyesyesnononoyesno
    A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnoyesnonononono
    A2P026: Car-free areanonononononono
    A2P026: Other
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesYesNoYesYesNo
    A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance CertificatePassive house (2 buildings, 4 200 m2, from 2015)
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoYesNo
    A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesZero Emission Building (ZEB) with the highest ambitions (ZEB-COM) (admin building, 1 141 m2, 2016)
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • New development strategies,
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • New development strategies,
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Smart cities strategies,
    • Urban Renewal Strategies,
    • New development strategies,
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyCarbon-Neutral Vantaa by 2030 (min. 80 % reduction of yearly emissions, capture or compensation os the residual 20 %),Reduction of 1018000 tons CO2 by 2030The study aligns closely with the decarbonisation and energy reduction pathways of residential multi family buildings with 1.5°C global warming target in Sweden. This study will also contribute to the achievement of the carbon neturality of whole Borlänge city by 2030.
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
    • Electrification of Cooking Methods,
    • Biogas
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
    • Biogas
    A3P003: Other
    A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
    A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesAccording to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary with heat pumps. Rooftop photovoltaic panels also have the potential for renewable energy generation. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity through this scenario.Decarbonize part of Aalborg city as a way of working incrementally towards being a zero-emission city.In our project, we carried out a comprehensive exploration of strategies to achieve positive energy districts in a Swedish residential portfolio. The focus on urban energy transitions necessitates a holistic approach that integrates building retrofit, solar technology exploration, and heating supply optimisation. Exploration of Local Solar Sources: The analysis reveals varying solar irradiance resources throughout the year, emphasizing the importance of strategic placement. Integration of combined photovoltaic and thermal panels into building envelopes demonstrates the potential to cover a significant portion of the energy demand even in Sweden. Heating Supply Optimisation with Solar Technologies: Despite the surplus energy production from on-site solar technology, challenges arise due to temporal energy asymmetry. The introduction of heat pumps emerges as a feasible solution to balance energy gaps, utilising both rejected and free heat. Optimisation scenarios, utilising a combination of geothermal heat pumps, water source heat pumps, and PVT, showcase remarkable reductions in emissions and primary energy consumption. Urban Form and Energy Infrastructure Design: We realised the importance of returning to urban form and energy infrastructure design to optimise future residential portfolio potential. Building layout design, influenced by zoning regulations and innovative typologies, plays a crucial role in achieving district level energy efficiency. Future challenges, including demographic shifts, e-mobility, and climate change, necessitate a more holistic approach to energy infrastructure design, addressing not only heating and electricity demands but also cooling requirements.
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviourIn Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed.- Stakeholder engagement; - Focus on implementing renewable energy production where possible; - Rretrofitting and energy optimization of existing buildings.While our investigation primarily centres on technical optimisation within Positive Energy District (PED) development, it is essential to acknowledge the broader scope encompassing social and governance dimensions. Specifically, understanding stakeholders' willingness to embrace technical recommendations upon project completion is important. Several potential influencing factors merit exploration, including economic considerations, technical optimisation-associated embodied carbon balance, the general public's technical perceptions, and operational feasibility. Evaluating these aspects holistically not only enhances the efficacy of PED initiatives but also fosters greater acceptance and participation within the communities they serve.
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    • Innovative business models,
    • Blockchain
    • Innovative business models,
    • PPP models,
    • Life Cycle Cost,
    • Circular economy models
    • Life Cycle Cost,
    • Circular economy models
    • Open data business models,
    • Life Cycle Cost,
    • Circular economy models,
    • Local trading
    A3P006: Other
    A3P007: Social models
    A3P007: Social models
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Citizen Social Research,
    • Prevention of energy poverty,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Citizen Social Research,
    • Policy Forums,
    • Quality of Life,
    • Strategies towards social mix,
    • Affordability,
    • Prevention of energy poverty,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
    • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Affordability
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Citizen Social Research
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Policy Forums,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour),
    • Other
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Social incentives,
    • Affordability,
    • Digital Inclusion
    A3P007: OtherCampus Evenstad is a small department at Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, with 220 students. Sharing knowledge is essential: Evenstad has regular visits from Politicians, decision-makers, researchers, environmental organizations, and energy- and building companies.
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • District Energy plans,
    • City Vision 2050,
    • SECAP Updates
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • SECAP Updates
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
    • District Energy plans
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • District Energy plans
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
    • District Energy plans,
    • Building / district Certification
    A3P008: Other
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    • Energy Neutral
    • Net zero carbon footprint,
    • Life Cycle approach,
    • Greening strategies,
    • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Low Emission Zone
    • Energy Neutral
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Net zero carbon footprint
    • Low Emission Zone
    • Low Emission Zone,
    • Net zero carbon footprint,
    • Life Cycle approach,
    • Sustainable Urban drainage systems (SUDS)
    A3P009: OtherEnergy Positive, Low Emission Zone
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsAt national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen:  Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation.  Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries.  The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals.  Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricityCurrent energy tariffs disincentivize both individual and collective PV systems – meaning energy communities are not economically feasible, housing associations and public buildings struggle with finding a secure RoI for solar panels, and citizens and local industry lack an incentive to install solar panels on their ownCampus Evenstad became a prosumer in 2016, as the first with DSO Eidsiva. Evenstad is also one of the first three PV systems in Norway to receive green certificates.
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionNeutralpath-project is working with the cocept of PCEDs = Positive and Clean Energy Districts (energy-efficient and energy-flexible districts with net zero greenhouse gas emissions and a surplus of renewable energy). Aviapolis Climate-Neutral Lab will work with both PCED and PCED relevant cases within the district.Çamlık District, unlike many other districts in Ankara, has a specific urban morphology that draws near the other pilot zones considered by the partners of PED-ACT. The site has three-storey single housing units, along with a fair amount of greenery around. Furthermore, the roof areas enable large amounts of PV installment, which results in higher amounts of local renewable energy potential. Therefore, the district is a good fit for PED development.The large scale provides interesting opportunities for both urban development and strategic energy planning; the diverse mix of buildings and functions also allow for interesting discussions regarding PEDs. Another interesting facet is that the district heating grid is almost fully supplied by waste heat.The biggest impact is the demonstration of several new energy solutions for local communities. Statsbygg/Campus Evenstad contributes to the development of innovations, pushing technological development through purchasing and demonstration of the solutions. This is a benefit for both end users, energy service providers and society at large. Evenstad also contribute to developing the local business community. For example, local biomass chip production for CHP, development of V2G-software etc. Several key solutions have been important when aiming to achieve the goals of reduced emissions, increased self-sufficiency in energy, and an energy-flexible campus. Example Vehicle-to-grid (V2G): We realized bidirectional EV charging at Campus Evenstad in 2019, demonstrating V2G for the first time in Norway. The experiences from Evenstad provide increased knowledge and practical experience from purchasing, installing and operating the V2G solution, and can contribute to creating new solutions within the energy system. With the equipment installed, the batteries in EVs can supply power back to buildings or the power grid. Example solar cells (PV): We installed PV in 2013 when there were only a few grid-connected PV systems in Norway. The PV system was an important piece in changing the view on solar energy in Norway, where businesses, the public sector and private individuals started seeing the potential for solar energy also this far north. In 2022, the PV system was expanded with PV cells on the facade of the energy center. Example Solar collector system: Covers 100m2 of the roof surface of dormitories and supplies supplies 117 dormitories with all the hot water they need (4000m2 floor area. The solar collector system is connected to the district heating system, where the main heat source is bioenergy. Solar energy and bioenergy complement each other at different times of the year. Example battery bank: Among the 5 largest electrical batteries in Norway connected to the grid. Example CHP: First of its kind in Norway, generating heat and electricity from biomass. Already in 2010, fossil fuels were phased out by converting from oil to wood-chip heating.The Rymdgatan's Residential Portfolio in Sweden presents a compelling case study for its classification as a PED-related research, given its alignment with sustainable behaviours and overarching PED development principles as follows: Inclusivity and Social Equity: The residential portfolio situated in Rymdgatan caters primarily to a low-income community. By focusing on this demographic, the project addresses critical aspects of social equity within sustainable urban development. Ensuring access to energy-efficient housing and amenities for economically disadvantaged populations not only fosters social cohesion but also mitigates energy poverty, a pressing concern in many urban contexts. Multifamily Residential Building: The inclusion of multifamily residential buildings within the portfolio underscores a commitment to density and efficient land use, both essential components of sustainable urban design. Such developments promote resource optimisation by consolidating housing units, thereby reducing per capita energy consumption and infrastructure demands. Moreover, multifamily dwellings often facilitate community engagement and shared resource management, fostering a culture of sustainability among residents. Low Carbon Retrofitting and Transition: The overarching initiative to transition the entire Jakobsgårdarna district. The included Rymdgatan portfolio, towards low carbon retrofitting, represents a significant example of decarbonization and climate resilience. By integrating energy-efficient technologies and renewable energy solutions into existing infrastructure, the project not only reduces carbon emissions but also serves as a blueprint for revitalising old urban environments sustainably. This holistic approach to retrofitting demonstrates a systemic commitment to environmental stewardship and long-term sustainability. Climate Adaptation and Renewable Energy Integration: Despite Sweden's climatic challenges, including lower solar resources during winter months, the Rymdgatan project leverages its geographical context to optimize renewable energy utilization. Sweden's greater solar resource availability during summer and geothermal potentials complement the design's emphasis on seasonal energy planning, where surplus energy generated during peak periods can be stored or redistributed efficiently. By embracing climate-responsive design strategies, the project demonstrates resilience in the face of climate variability while harnessing renewable energy potential effectively.
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentAccording to Vantaa city strategy 2021-2025 Aviapolis area aims to become the greenest airport city in Europe. The district is transforming from a logistics and business focused area to a lively urban district which gives an opportunity to rethink the areas energy solutions. With Neutralpath-project Vantaa aims to support the development of the district's energy system and explore innovative, energy efficient and fossil free district energy solutions.PED-ACT project.The area has an interesting history of development and has recently undergone several urban improvements. This is coupled with a strong local network of business owners and other stakeholders, all with an interest in developing the area in the best way possible. This made for an interesting case from a planning perspective to investigate how this network would pick up on the concept of PED and whether they could see any potential utility in relation to their everyday experiences.In line with the EU's vision of "local energy communities", Campus Evenstad demonstrates energy actions that contribute to the clean energy transition. The campus has been developed over several years, demonstrating several innovative and sustainable technologies and energy solutions in a microgrid, e.g. vehicle to grid (V2G), biomass-based combined heat and power (CHP), solar energy, energy storage and zero emission buildings. It shows how to use new technology to enable zero emissions areas. Dedicated professionals, both Statsbygg's operating staff and researchers from FME ZEN have been central to the realization, together with dedicated management at the University campus, who have shown a great willingness to implement new solutions.Borlänge city has committed to become the carbon-neutral city by 2030.
    B1P003: Environment of the case study area
    B2P003: Environment of the case study areaUrban areaSuburban areaSuburban areaSuburban areaRuralUrban area
    B1P004: Type of district
    B2P004: Type of district
    • New construction,
    • Renovation
    • Renovation
    • New construction
    • Renovation
    • New construction,
    • Renovation
    • Renovation
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    • Re-use / Transformation Area,
    • New Development
    • Retrofitting Area
    • New Development
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Re-use / Transformation Area,
    • Retrofitting Area
    B1P006: Year of construction
    B1P006: Year of construction19861990
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential16.931100
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential100
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential6
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential6
    B1P011: Population density before intervention
    B1P011: Population density before intervention0000000
    B1P012: Population density after intervention
    B1P012: Population density after intervention0000000.010658622423328
    B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
    B1P013: Residentialnoyesyesnononoyes
    B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]508004360
    B1P013: Officenoyesnonononono
    B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Industry and Utilitynoyesnonononono
    B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Commercialnoyesnonononono
    B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Institutionalnoyesnonononono
    B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Natural areasnononoyesnonono
    B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Recreationalnoyesnonononono
    B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Dismissed areasnoyesnonononono
    B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Othernonononononoyes
    B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]706
    B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
    B1P014: Residentialnoyesyesyesnonoyes
    B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]508004360
    B1P014: Officenoyesnonononono
    B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Industry and Utilitynoyesnonononono
    B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Commercialnoyesnonononono
    B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Institutionalnoyesnoyesnonono
    B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Natural areasnononoyesnonono
    B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Recreationalnoyesnonononono
    B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononononono
    B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Othernononoyesnonoyes
    B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]706
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionGroningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city.Neutralpath-project is working with the cocept of PCEDs = Positive and Clean Energy Districts (energy-efficient and energy-flexible districts with net zero greenhouse gas emissions and a surplus of renewable energy). Aviapolis Climate-Neutral Lab will work with both PCED and PCED relevant cases within the district.An ongoing process and dialogue with local stakeholders to determine the future development of the area.
    B2P002: Installation life time
    B2P002: Installation life timeThe MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact.No new installation will be made throughout the project. Rather the project will attempt to establish a local PED network with the aim of empowering the stakeholders to better engage with sustainable technologies.
    B2P003: Scale of action
    B2P003: ScaleDistrictDistrictDistrictDistrict
    B2P004: Operator of the installation
    B2P004: Operator of the installationThe Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties.The City of Vantaa manages the lab, working closely with landowners and other stakeholders such as energy companies, solution providers, universities and citizens.Kristian Olesen
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materialsGroningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materialsReplication is primarily focused on the establishment of a local network with an interest in and understanding of PED.
    B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
    B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?NoNo
    B2P006: Other
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    • Civic
    • Strategic
    • Civic
    B2P007: Other
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipalityMunicipalityResearch center/University
    B2P008: Other
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    • Academia,
    • Private,
    • Industrial,
    • Other
    • Academia,
    • Private,
    • Industrial,
    • Citizens, public, NGO
    • Academia,
    • Private
    B2P009: Otherresearch companies, monitoring company, ict company
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    • Buildings,
    • Demand-side management,
    • Energy storage,
    • Energy networks,
    • Waste management,
    • Lighting,
    • E-mobility,
    • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
    • Social interactions,
    • Business models
    B2P011: Other
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    • Tools for prototyping and modelling
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    • Execution plan,
    • Available data,
    • Type of measured data,
    • Equipment,
    • Level of access
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    • Energy,
    • Social,
    • Economical / Financial
    • Energy,
    • Environmental,
    • Social,
    • Economical / Financial
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P017: Capacities
    B2P017: Capacities
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P019: Available tools
    • Energy modelling,
    • Social models,
    • Business and financial models
    • Energy modelling
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P020: External accessibility
    B2P020: External accessibilityTo follow the lab and Vantaa's activities in Neutralpath, fill in the following form: https://neutralpath.eu/fi/tayta-lomake-liittyaksesi-cn-labiin/
    C1P001: Unlocking Factors
    C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important
    C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
    C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
    C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important
    C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important
    C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)Real-estate market situation
    C1P002: Driving Factors
    C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)Earthquakes due to gas extraction
    C1P003: Administrative barriers
    C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important
    C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
    C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
    C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
    C1P004: Policy barriers
    C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
    C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
    C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
    C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
    C1P005: Non-effective regulations3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
    C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
    C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
    C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
    C1P006: Environmental barriers
    C1P006: Environmental barriers- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Water Scarcity: 1 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Natural Disasters: 12 - Slightly important
    C1P007: Technical barriers
    C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
    C1P007: Deficient planning2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
    C1P007: Lack of well-defined process3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
    C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
    C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
    C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)Energy management systems of different new technologies does not "talk together" (e.g. solar inverter, V2G inverter). This creates challenges.
    C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
    C1P008: Inertia2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P008: Rebound effect2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
    C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
    C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
    C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)Different interests - Grid/energy stakeholders and building stakeholders
    C1P010: Financial barriers
    C1P010: Hidden costs2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P010: Risk and uncertainty3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
    C1P011: Market barriers
    C1P011: Split incentives5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P011: Energy price distortion4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
    C1P012: Stakeholders involved
    C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading
    • Planning/leading
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Research & Innovation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading
    C1P012: Financial/Funding
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Construction/implementation
    • None
    C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    C1P012: Business process management
    • Planning/leading
    • Planning/leading
    • None
    C1P012: Urban Services providers
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    C1P012: Real Estate developers
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Design/demand aggregation
    C1P012: Design/Construction companies
    • Construction/implementation
    • Construction/implementation
    • Construction/implementation
    • None
    C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
    • None
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • None
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Construction/implementation
    • Construction/implementation
    • None
    C1P012: Other
    C1P012: Other (if any)
    Summary

    Authors (framework concept)

    Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

    Contributors (to the content)

    Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

    Implemented by

    Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
    Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)