Filters:
NameProjectTypeCompare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Uncompare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Uncompare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Uncompare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleGroningen, PED North
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city
Uden, Loopkantstraat
Munich, Harthof district
Aalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, Denmark
Ankara, Çamlık District
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio
Lublin
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabGroningen, PED NorthRiga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student cityUden, LoopkantstraatMunich, Harthof districtAalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, DenmarkAnkara, Çamlık DistrictBorlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential PortfolioLublin
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynoyesnoyesnoyesnoyes
PED relevant case studynonoyesnoyesyesyesno
PED Lab.yesnononoyesnonono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusyesnoyesyesnoyesyesyes
Energy communityyesyesnoyesnoyesyesyes
Circularityyesnonononononoyes
Air quality and urban comfortnononononononoyes
Electrificationnonoyesnonoyesyesno
Net-zero energy costnononononoyesnoyes
Net-zero emissionyesnonononoyesnoyes
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)noyesnononononoyes
Maximise self-sufficiencynoyesnonoyesyesyesyes
Othernononononononono
Other (A1P004)
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabImplementation PhasePlanning PhaseIn operationImplementation PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date12/1801/2406/1701/2311/2210/22
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date12/2312/2605/2312/2711/2509/25
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets,
  • Vehicle registration datasets
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
  • TNO, Hanze, RUG,
  • Ped noord book
  • Inger Andresen, Tonje Healey Trulsrud, Luca Finocchiaro, Alessandro Nocente, Meril Tamm, Joana Ortiz, Jaume Salom, Abel Magyari, Linda Hoes-van Oeffelen, Wouter Borsboom, Wim Kornaat, Niki Gaitani, Design and performance predictions of plus energy neighbourhoods – Case studies of demonstration projects in four different European climates, Energy and Buildings, Volume 274, 2022, 112447, ISSN 0378-7788, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112447. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778822006181),
  • Deliverable, Report: Integrated Energy Design for Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods (syn.ikia),
  • Deliverable, Report: DEMONSTRATION CASE OF SUSTAINABLE PLUS ENERGY NEIGHBOURHOODS IN MARINE CLIMATE (syn.ikia),
  • https://www.synikia.eu/no/bibliotek/
    A1P011: Geographic coordinates
    X Coordinate (longitude):6.53512124.081683395.619111.56962505994760410.00732.79536915.39449522.5684
    Y Coordinate (latitude):53.23484656.9524595651.660648.2043626127515257.04102839.88181260.48660951.2465
    A1P012: Country
    A1P012: CountryNetherlandsLatviaNetherlandsGermanyDenmarkTurkeySwedenPoland
    A1P013: City
    A1P013: CityGroningenRigaUdenMunichAalborgAnkaraBorlängeLublin
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CfaCfbCfbCfbDfbDsbDsbCfb
    A1P015: District boundary
    A1P015: District boundaryFunctionalGeographicGeographicGeographicVirtualGeographicGeographicGeographic
    Other
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:MixedPublicPrivateMixedPublicPrivateMixedPrivate
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple Owners
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED7151126257105
    A1P019: Conditioned space
    A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]1.01170000236020622600370021664.73
    A1P020: Total ground area
    A1P020: Total ground area [m²]17.13211926438605603130800050800994572833.47
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area01100000
    A1P022: Financial schemes
    A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estateyesnoyesnonononono
    A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]7804440
    A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenononononononono
    A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Otheryesnonononononono
    A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnononononononono
    A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingyesnonononononono
    A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnononononononono
    A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingyesnonoyesnononono
    A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernononononononono
    A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUyesyesnoyesnoyesnono
    A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]7500000
    A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonononoyesyesnono
    A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnononononononono
    A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernononononononono
    A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022: Other
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
    • Job creation,
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production,
    • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
    A1P023: Other
    A1P024: More comments:
    A1P024: More comments:The project is a follow-up from the “Social Beautiful” concept which was developed in collaboration between Labyrint (Support in sheltered housing), Area (housing company), the municipality of Uden, and Hendriks Coppelmans (developer). The concept aims to provide an answer to changes in various policy areas and the changing demands of society. The Social Beautiful concept consists of the following elements: 1. Living, working, and community services are brought together in one location. A multifunctional residential and service centre is being realized at the location. 2. Housing is shaped by the realization of financially accessible homes suitable for the target group. The housing design is tailored to the target group. it may also include sheltered / protected living. 3. Work takes place at the location or from the same location. The work has a social function within the neighbourhood. Wage-related work must contribute to providing structure in the daily activities of the residents. 4. Neighbourhood management is organized from the location in the surrounding neighbourhood. A service package is provided from the residential and service centre that contributes to the ability of neighbourhood residents to live independently for longer, to strengthen the social network, and to improve the quality of life and safety in the neighbourhood. 5. The houses are suitable for use at all times for regular rental. Communal facilities must be realized within the contours of a regular apartment. The objective is to offer a suitable living and working situation to a group of vulnerable citizens. In this way they become a fully-fledged part of society. They not only make use of the facilities themselves, but also give substance to the level of facilities in the municipality. Due to the integrated approach, they experience a greater sense of well-being and security.The urban morphology of Çamlık District differs in several ways, compared with the typical urban fabric in Türkiye, along with the capital city of Ankara. The houses on the site are composed of three-story attached single-housing units with multiple rows, creating a total of 257 housing units in total. Low-rise buildings coupled with suitably oriented rooftop surfaces brings about significant advantages in the site. Dense greenery in the site also results in reduced cooling energy demand in the buildings.Lublin PED Area is geographically bounded and the ambition is to reach Self-Sufficiency. There is a shopping centre with a large rooftop area for solar generation and there are also an empty lot (just on the east side of the building) and a carpark area (on the north side) next to the commercial centre. These areas can also be evaluated for on-site (on the ground – or canopies for cars) energy generation. There are also new built (mainly in 2012) residential blocks with high efficiency and this district is so-called an “eco-district”. Thanks to the District Heating Grid (DHN), all buildings are connected to each other the network has potential for sharing mechanisms in the PED Area. Another opportunity for renewable energy is that these buildings are connected to more or less the end point of DHN and for this reason, a waste heat potential from the return pipe may also be considered. There are also small size residentials, that are not connected to the DHN, around the PED area and this enlightened the technical team for exporting energy from PED to these areas with a new infrastructure.
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]7804440
    Contact person for general enquiries
    A1P026: NameJasper Tonen, Elisabeth KoopsJudith StiekemaTonje Healey TrulsrudStefan SynekKristian OlesenProf. Dr. İpek Gürsel DİNOJingchun ShenDorota Wolińska-Pietrzak
    A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of GroningenOASCNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)City of MunichAalborg UniversityMiddle East Technical UniversityHögskolan DalarnaLublin Municipality
    A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesOtherResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public Bodies
    A1P028: Othernot for profit private organisationAndreas Bärnreuther
    A1P029: EmailJasper.tonen@groningen.nljudith@oascities.orgtonje.h.trulsrud@ntnu.nostefan.synek@muenchen.deKristian@plan.aau.dkipekg@metu.edu.trjih@du.sedwolinska@lublin.eu
    Contact person for other special topics
    A1P030: NameStefan SynekAlex Søgaard MorenoAssoc. Prof. Onur TaylanXingxing Zhang
    A1P031: Emailstefan.synek@muenchen.deasm@aalborg.dkotaylan@metu.edu.trxza@du.se
    Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
    A2P001: Fields of application
    A2P001: Fields of application
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
    • Waste management
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Digital technologies
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • Waste management,
    • Indoor air quality,
    • Construction materials
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Digital technologies,
    • Construction materials
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
    • Digital technologies
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy production,
    • Construction materials
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Construction materials
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
    • Digital technologies,
    • Indoor air quality
    A2P001: Other
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streamsA suite of replicable modeling tools will enable stakeholders to analyze planning actions towards positive energy in a cost-effective fashion, aiding their evidence based decision-making process. The tools will be able to model the district’s energy production and demand, optimize for flexibility and simulate mobility and transport. By employing gamification and co-creation approaches, the project will enhance public awareness and engagement in energy efficiency. The project will culminate in the publication of practical guidelines, reusable models, algorithms, and training materials to aid other cities to replicate the digital twin for their districts, fostering widespread adoption of sustainable energy practices.Energy efficiency: Energy efficient envelope, with good insulation, triple glazing windows and airtight envelope. (EPC = 0) Energy Flexibility: MCP controls for the heat pump in the apartments. Energy production: PV panels on the roof, Ground source heat pumps Waste management: construction waste was kept to a minimum and sorted and collected separately as much as possible. Indoor air quality: Exhaust ventilation and opening of windows Construction materials: low carbon emission building materialsStakeholder engagement, expert energy system analysis, future scenariosThe energy consumption and efficiency of the energy model of Çamlık Site, created using EnergyPlus software, have been evaluated under the scenarios specified below. At each stage, a new system was incorporated to explore the potential of the area becoming a PED. In this context, four scenarios were created to compare different energy scenarios for the Ankara pilot area and to observe the impact of the included systems on energy efficiency: V_base; V_ER; V_ER,HP; V_ER,HP,PV. The basic scenario (V_base) was created using the current state without any improvement to the building envelope. This scenario was developed to determine the annual energy needs of the entire site without any intervention and serves as a reference point for the other developed models. The second scenario (V_ER) was created to improve the building envelopes of all residential units in the area, altering the U-values according to Türkiye's current building standards (TS-825). The third scenario (V_ER,HP) primarily includes a heat pump model that can use electrical energy to produce higher thermal energy and is added on top of the improvements in the second scenario. Finally, the V_ER,HP,PV scenario combines building envelope improvements, the heat pump, and the solar PV system.Load calculation and system optimisation: City Energy Analyst Identification of stranded assets for asset owners and investors to understand the carbon risks: CRREMSEE: D4.1 - Methodology and Guidelines for PED design https://makingcity.eu/results/#1551708358627-aefa76ef-66b2
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoNoYesNoYesNoNo
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesNoYesNoYesYesYes
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesNoNoNoNoNoNo
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationMobility, till now, is not included in the energy model.The university operates a fleet of 13 electric vehicles (EV) (61kW power each). There are 5 EV charging stations on campus.not includedLarge combined industrial, residential, and commercial area with complex flows of in- and outgoing traffic.Mobility is not included in the calculations.
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]2.380000.1482183.4460.6777
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.3350000.1091480.5280.03656
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]0
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]0
    A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P011: PVnonoyesyesnoyesnono
    A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.0583.4240
    A2P011: Windnoyesnonoyesnonono
    A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Hydronononononononono
    A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Biomass_elnononononononono
    A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnononononononono
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: PVT_elnoyesnonononoyesno
    A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.01818
    A2P011: Othernonononoyesnonono
    A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P012: Geothermalyesnoyesnonononono
    A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Solar Thermalyesnonoyesnononono
    A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Biomass_heatyesyesnononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.1
    A2P012: Waste heat+HPyesnononoyesnonono
    A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]300
    A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnononononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: PVT_thyesnononononoyesno
    A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.0825
    A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnononononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Othernononononononono
    A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesGeothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centersConventional power generation: The university’s heat supply is designed as a local centralized heat supply system. Electrical power, generated in combined heat and power (CHP) units, is delivered to the distribution network and sold to energy traders as regulated by local legislation and norms. There are two natural gas burners acting as heat sources (3MW and 6MW capacity), and two CHP units (1.6MW and 0.45MW thermal capacity). All heating is supplied from the CHP plants. Renewable Energy Sources (RES): a wind turbine (3.6 kW) and PV panels (11.7 kW) are connected to the faculty microgrid. In the future it is planned to power the campus entirely from local RES.*Annual energy use below is presentedin primary energy consumptionVery little wind production currently exists in the area. The electricity production of the waste incineration plant will be included at a later date. Aalborg East is partly a remarkable area for hosting a Portland cement factory that accounts for a substantial share of Denmark’s total CO2 emissions. In turn, it also provides waste heat to the district heating grid for all of Aalborg city and some of the smaller towns that are connected to the same DH grid.
    A2P014: Annual energy use
    A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]0.1946203.9760.318
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]0.03683990.2055
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
    A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P017: Gasnoyesnoyesnoyesnono
    A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Coalnononononononono
    A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Oilnononoyesnononono
    A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Othernonononoyesnoyesno
    A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]3000
    A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P018: PVnononoyesnononono
    A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Windnononoyesnononono
    A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Hydronononononononono
    A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_elnononoyesnononono
    A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnononoyesnononono
    A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: PVT_elnononoyesnononono
    A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Othernonononononoyesno
    A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.187
    A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P019: Geothermalnononoyesnononono
    A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Solar Thermalnononononononono
    A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_heatnononoyesnononono
    A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Waste heat+HPnononoyesnononono
    A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnononononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: PVT_thnononononononono
    A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnononononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Othernonononononoyesno
    A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary0000000.538395721925130
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]-0.000436.93
    A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
    A2P022: Safety & SecurityPersonal Safetynone
    A2P022: HealthHealthy communitythermal comfort diagram
    A2P022: Educationnone
    A2P022: MobilitySustainable mobilitynone
    A2P022: EnergyNOn-renewable primary energy balance, renewable energy ratio, grid purchase factor, load cover factor/self-generation, supply cover factor/self-consumption, net energy/net power, peak delivered/peak expoted, total greenhouse gas emissionEnergynormalized CO2/GHG & Energy intensity
    A2P022: Water
    A2P022: Economic developmentcapital costs, operational cots, overall economic performance (5 KPIs)cost of excess emissions
    A2P022: Housing and Communitydemographic composition, diverse community, social cohesion
    A2P022: Waste
    A2P022: OtherSmartness and flecibility, Indoor Environmental Quality, Social performance - Equity (affordable housing, access to servicees and amenitioes, afforability of energy, living conditions, sustinable mobility, universal design)
    A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
    A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesnoyesyesyesyesyesyes
    A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsyesnononoyesnoyesno
    A2P023: Wind Turbinesnononononononono
    A2P023: Geothermal energy systemyesnoyesyesnonoyesno
    A2P023: Waste heat recoveryyesnononoyesnoyesno
    A2P023: Waste to energyyesnononoyesnonono
    A2P023: Polygenerationnononononononono
    A2P023: Co-generationnononononononono
    A2P023: Heat Pumpyesnoyesyesyesyesyesyes
    A2P023: Hydrogennononononononoyes
    A2P023: Hydropower plantnononononononono
    A2P023: Biomassnonononoyesnonono
    A2P023: Biogasnononononononono
    A2P023: Other
    A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
    A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)yesyesnoyesnonoyesyes
    A2P024: Energy management systemyesyesyesyesyesnonoyes
    A2P024: Demand-side managementyesyesyesnoyesnonoyes
    A2P024: Smart electricity gridnoyesnonoyesnonoyes
    A2P024: Thermal Storageyesyesnoyesyesnoyesyes
    A2P024: Electric Storageyesyesnoyesyesnonoyes
    A2P024: District Heating and Coolingyesyesnoyesyesnoyesyes
    A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsyesyesyesyesyesnonoyes
    A2P024: P2P – buildingsnononononononono
    A2P024: Other
    A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
    A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnononoyesyesyesyesyes
    A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsyesnonononononoyes
    A2P025: High-performance new buildingsyesnoyesnonononoyes
    A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)yesnonononononoyes
    A2P025: Urban data platformsyesyesnoyesnononoyes
    A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnoyesnononononoyes
    A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)noyesyesnonoyesyesyes
    A2P025: Smart irrigationnononononononono
    A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnononononononono
    A2P025: Smart surveillancenonononoyesnonono
    A2P025: Other
    A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
    A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nononononononoyes
    A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)nononononononoyes
    A2P026: e-Mobilityyesnonoyesnononoyes
    A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnononoyesnononono
    A2P026: Car-free areanononononononono
    A2P026: Other
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesNoYesYesYesNoNoNo
    A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance CertificateEPC = 0, energy neutral building
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoNoNoNoNo
    A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • New development strategies,
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Smart cities strategies,
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Smart cities strategies,
    • Urban Renewal Strategies,
    • New development strategies,
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
    • Smart cities strategies,
    • Urban Renewal Strategies,
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • New development strategies,
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyCity wide climate neutrality by 2035, city administration climate neutrality by 2030Reduction of 1018000 tons CO2 by 2030The study aligns closely with the decarbonisation and energy reduction pathways of residential multi family buildings with 1.5°C global warming target in Sweden. This study will also contribute to the achievement of the carbon neturality of whole Borlänge city by 2030.
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
    • Electrification of Cooking Methods,
    • Biogas
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
    • Biogas
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
    • Other
    A3P003: OtherHeating Grid
    A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
    A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesDecarbonize part of Aalborg city as a way of working incrementally towards being a zero-emission city.According to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary with heat pumps. Rooftop photovoltaic panels also have the potential for renewable energy generation. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity through this scenario.In our project, we carried out a comprehensive exploration of strategies to achieve positive energy districts in a Swedish residential portfolio. The focus on urban energy transitions necessitates a holistic approach that integrates building retrofit, solar technology exploration, and heating supply optimisation. Exploration of Local Solar Sources: The analysis reveals varying solar irradiance resources throughout the year, emphasizing the importance of strategic placement. Integration of combined photovoltaic and thermal panels into building envelopes demonstrates the potential to cover a significant portion of the energy demand even in Sweden. Heating Supply Optimisation with Solar Technologies: Despite the surplus energy production from on-site solar technology, challenges arise due to temporal energy asymmetry. The introduction of heat pumps emerges as a feasible solution to balance energy gaps, utilising both rejected and free heat. Optimisation scenarios, utilising a combination of geothermal heat pumps, water source heat pumps, and PVT, showcase remarkable reductions in emissions and primary energy consumption. Urban Form and Energy Infrastructure Design: We realised the importance of returning to urban form and energy infrastructure design to optimise future residential portfolio potential. Building layout design, influenced by zoning regulations and innovative typologies, plays a crucial role in achieving district level energy efficiency. Future challenges, including demographic shifts, e-mobility, and climate change, necessitate a more holistic approach to energy infrastructure design, addressing not only heating and electricity demands but also cooling requirements.
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviourIn Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed.- Stakeholder engagement; - Focus on implementing renewable energy production where possible; - Rretrofitting and energy optimization of existing buildings.While our investigation primarily centres on technical optimisation within Positive Energy District (PED) development, it is essential to acknowledge the broader scope encompassing social and governance dimensions. Specifically, understanding stakeholders' willingness to embrace technical recommendations upon project completion is important. Several potential influencing factors merit exploration, including economic considerations, technical optimisation-associated embodied carbon balance, the general public's technical perceptions, and operational feasibility. Evaluating these aspects holistically not only enhances the efficacy of PED initiatives but also fosters greater acceptance and participation within the communities they serve.
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    • Innovative business models,
    • Blockchain
    • Open data business models,
    • Innovative business models,
    • Demand management Living Lab
    • Open data business models
    • Life Cycle Cost,
    • Circular economy models
    • Open data business models,
    • Life Cycle Cost,
    • Circular economy models,
    • Local trading
    A3P006: Other
    A3P007: Social models
    A3P007: Social models
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Citizen Social Research,
    • Prevention of energy poverty,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Social incentives,
    • Quality of Life
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
    • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Policy Forums,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Affordability
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Social incentives,
    • Affordability,
    • Digital Inclusion
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
    A3P007: Other
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • District Energy plans,
    • City Vision 2050,
    • SECAP Updates
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • District Energy plans
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
    • District Energy plans
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
    • District Energy plans,
    • Building / district Certification
    • City Vision 2050,
    • SECAP Updates
    A3P008: Other
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    • Energy Neutral
    • Energy Neutral
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Net zero carbon footprint
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Low Emission Zone
    • Low Emission Zone,
    • Net zero carbon footprint,
    • Life Cycle approach,
    • Sustainable Urban drainage systems (SUDS)
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Low Emission Zone,
    • Net zero carbon footprint,
    • Carbon-free,
    • Life Cycle approach,
    • Greening strategies,
    • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
    A3P009: OtherEnergy Positive, Low Emission Zone
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsAt national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen:  Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation.  Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries.  The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals.  Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricitydecision by the Munich City Council in 2019 to become climate neutral by 2030 / 2035Current energy tariffs disincentivize both individual and collective PV systems – meaning energy communities are not economically feasible, housing associations and public buildings struggle with finding a secure RoI for solar panels, and citizens and local industry lack an incentive to install solar panels on their own
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionExPEDite aims at creating and deploying a novel digital twin, allowing for real-time monitoring, visualization and management of district-level energy flows. Cities consume 65% of the world’s energy supply and are responsible for 70% of the CO² emissions, hence sharing a lot of the responsibility for climate change. We are faced with the challenge of redesigning our existing cities to make them more sustainable, resilient, inclusive and safe. Developing Positive Energy Districts (PEDs), is a breakthrough way to deal with the issue of urban emissions and applying adaptation and mitigation strategies to climate change, while ensuring that these urban areas generate an annual surplus of renewable energy and net zero greenhouse gas emissions. PEDs must address environmental, economic and social issues, providing solutions to energy consumption, production, emissions, transport & mobility and livability. By constantly monitoring and evaluating parameters through existing and/or novel sensor systems (e.g., renewable energy production/supply, transport conditions, air quality, energy demand, meteorological conditions, etc.), unconventional techniques may be applied to provide more sustainable options for the district’s needs.The demonstration projects is a new residential development, which consists of an apartment complex which includes 39 apartments spread over 3 floors. It is a sustainble plus energy neighbouhood, and has reached a plus energy balance on its first year in operation. It has MPC controls on the individual heat pumps to improve the energy flexibility of the apartments. It includes the "social beatiful" concepts with a strong emphasis on the social sustainability of the project.Munich as demonstrator together with Lyon in ASCEND projectThe large scale provides interesting opportunities for both urban development and strategic energy planning; the diverse mix of buildings and functions also allow for interesting discussions regarding PEDs. Another interesting facet is that the district heating grid is almost fully supplied by waste heat.Çamlık District, unlike many other districts in Ankara, has a specific urban morphology that draws near the other pilot zones considered by the partners of PED-ACT. The site has three-storey single housing units, along with a fair amount of greenery around. Furthermore, the roof areas enable large amounts of PV installment, which results in higher amounts of local renewable energy potential. Therefore, the district is a good fit for PED development.The Rymdgatan's Residential Portfolio in Sweden presents a compelling case study for its classification as a PED-related research, given its alignment with sustainable behaviours and overarching PED development principles as follows: Inclusivity and Social Equity: The residential portfolio situated in Rymdgatan caters primarily to a low-income community. By focusing on this demographic, the project addresses critical aspects of social equity within sustainable urban development. Ensuring access to energy-efficient housing and amenities for economically disadvantaged populations not only fosters social cohesion but also mitigates energy poverty, a pressing concern in many urban contexts. Multifamily Residential Building: The inclusion of multifamily residential buildings within the portfolio underscores a commitment to density and efficient land use, both essential components of sustainable urban design. Such developments promote resource optimisation by consolidating housing units, thereby reducing per capita energy consumption and infrastructure demands. Moreover, multifamily dwellings often facilitate community engagement and shared resource management, fostering a culture of sustainability among residents. Low Carbon Retrofitting and Transition: The overarching initiative to transition the entire Jakobsgårdarna district. The included Rymdgatan portfolio, towards low carbon retrofitting, represents a significant example of decarbonization and climate resilience. By integrating energy-efficient technologies and renewable energy solutions into existing infrastructure, the project not only reduces carbon emissions but also serves as a blueprint for revitalising old urban environments sustainably. This holistic approach to retrofitting demonstrates a systemic commitment to environmental stewardship and long-term sustainability. Climate Adaptation and Renewable Energy Integration: Despite Sweden's climatic challenges, including lower solar resources during winter months, the Rymdgatan project leverages its geographical context to optimize renewable energy utilization. Sweden's greater solar resource availability during summer and geothermal potentials complement the design's emphasis on seasonal energy planning, where surplus energy generated during peak periods can be stored or redistributed efficiently. By embracing climate-responsive design strategies, the project demonstrates resilience in the face of climate variability while harnessing renewable energy potential effectively.
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentExpected outcome 1 Increased number of (tangible) city planning actions for positive clean energy districts using the (proto-)PED design, development and management digital twin tools (based on pre-market research learnings) using open-standards based components which can be reused elsewhere. 2 Increased integration of existing smaller scale management systems (e.g. Building management systems) with open-standards based operational city platforms using sectorial data (e.g. building data, mobility, urban planning, etc.). 3 Enhanced data gathering approaches with identification of relevant multidimensional data sets (e.g. meteorological, load profile, social, geo-spatial, etc.) high-resolution real-time data streams (e.g. renewable energy production, energy consumption), and relevant forecasting data, drawing also on the work of common European data spaces. 4 Increased number of city planning departments / approaches using common data and (replicable) elements and processes. 5 Consolidated city sensor network specifications, complemented by appropriate data gathering approaches for soft data. 6 Improved performance of AI based self-learning systems for optimization of positive clean energy districts and bottom-up complex models. 7 Enhanced innovation capacity of local/regional administrations and accelerated uptake of shared, smart and sustainable zero emission solutions.The need for social housing and the ambition to create a great living environment with a high-performance apartment complex, supplied with renewable energy. It results in lower energy bills for the tenants and high-quality homes.speed and scale of PEDsThe area has an interesting history of development and has recently undergone several urban improvements. This is coupled with a strong local network of business owners and other stakeholders, all with an interest in developing the area in the best way possible. This made for an interesting case from a planning perspective to investigate how this network would pick up on the concept of PED and whether they could see any potential utility in relation to their everyday experiences.PED-ACT project.Borlänge city has committed to become the carbon-neutral city by 2030.
    B1P003: Environment of the case study area
    B2P003: Environment of the case study areaUrban areaSuburban areaUrban areaSuburban areaSuburban areaUrban area
    B1P004: Type of district
    B2P004: Type of district
    • New construction
    • Renovation
    • Renovation
    • Renovation
    • Renovation
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    • New Development
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Re-use / Transformation Area,
    • Retrofitting Area
    B1P006: Year of construction
    B1P006: Year of construction19861990
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential616.931100
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential6100
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential6
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential6
    B1P011: Population density before intervention
    B1P011: Population density before intervention00000000
    B1P012: Population density after intervention
    B1P012: Population density after intervention0000.010714285714286000.0106586224233280
    B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
    B1P013: Residentialnononoyesnoyesyesno
    B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]508004360
    B1P013: Officenononononononono
    B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Industry and Utilitynononononononono
    B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Commercialnononononononono
    B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Institutionalnononononononono
    B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Natural areasnononononononono
    B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Recreationalnononononononono
    B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Dismissed areasnononononononono
    B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Othernonononononoyesno
    B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]706
    B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
    B1P014: Residentialnonoyesyesnoyesyesno
    B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]2394508004360
    B1P014: Officenononononononono
    B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Industry and Utilitynononononononono
    B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Commercialnononononononono
    B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Institutionalnononononononono
    B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Natural areasnononononononono
    B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Recreationalnononononononono
    B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Dismissed areasnononononononono
    B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Othernonononononoyesno
    B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]706
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionGroningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city.An ongoing process and dialogue with local stakeholders to determine the future development of the area.
    B2P002: Installation life time
    B2P002: Installation life timeThe MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact.No new installation will be made throughout the project. Rather the project will attempt to establish a local PED network with the aim of empowering the stakeholders to better engage with sustainable technologies.
    B2P003: Scale of action
    B2P003: ScaleDistrictDistrictDistrict
    B2P004: Operator of the installation
    B2P004: Operator of the installationThe Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties.Kristian Olesen
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materialsGroningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materialsReplication is primarily focused on the establishment of a local network with an interest in and understanding of PED.
    B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
    B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?NoNoYes
    B2P006: Other
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    • Civic
    • Civic
    • Strategic
    B2P007: Other
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipalityResearch center/UniversityMunicipality
    B2P008: Other
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    • Academia,
    • Private,
    • Industrial,
    • Other
    • Academia,
    • Private
    • Academia,
    • Private,
    • Industrial,
    • Citizens, public, NGO
    B2P009: Otherresearch companies, monitoring company, ict company
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    • Buildings,
    • Demand-side management,
    • Energy storage,
    • Energy networks,
    • Waste management,
    • Lighting,
    • E-mobility,
    • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
    • Social interactions,
    • Business models
    • Buildings,
    • Demand-side management,
    • Prosumers,
    • Renewable generation,
    • Efficiency measures,
    • Waste management,
    • Water treatment,
    • Lighting,
    • E-mobility,
    • Green areas,
    • Circular economy models
    B2P011: Other
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    • Tools for prototyping and modelling
    • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    • Execution plan,
    • Available data,
    • Type of measured data,
    • Equipment,
    • Level of access
    • Available data
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    • Energy,
    • Social,
    • Economical / Financial
    • Energy
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P017: Capacities
    B2P017: Capacities
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P019: Available tools
    • Energy modelling,
    • Social models,
    • Business and financial models
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P020: External accessibility
    B2P020: External accessibility
    C1P001: Unlocking Factors
    C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
    C1P002: Driving Factors
    C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)Earthquakes due to gas extraction
    C1P003: Administrative barriers
    C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)Delay in the Environmental Dialogue processing in the municipality
    C1P004: Policy barriers
    C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
    C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
    C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
    C1P005: Non-effective regulations3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
    C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
    C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
    C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
    C1P006: Environmental barriers
    C1P006: Environmental barriers- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Water Scarcity: 1 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Natural Disasters: 12 - Slightly important
    C1P007: Technical barriers
    C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P007: Deficient planning2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P007: Lack of well-defined process3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
    C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
    C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
    C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
    C1P008: Inertia2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
    C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P008: Rebound effect2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
    C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
    C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
    C1P010: Financial barriers
    C1P010: Hidden costs2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P010: Risk and uncertainty3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
    C1P011: Market barriers
    C1P011: Split incentives5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P011: Energy price distortion4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
    C1P012: Stakeholders involved
    C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • None
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading
    C1P012: Research & Innovation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    • Planning/leading
    • Design/demand aggregation
    C1P012: Financial/Funding
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    • None
    • None
    C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    • None
    C1P012: Business process management
    • Planning/leading
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • None
    • None
    C1P012: Urban Services providers
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading
    • None
    • None
    C1P012: Real Estate developers
    • Construction/implementation
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • None
    C1P012: Design/Construction companies
    • Construction/implementation
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • None
    • None
    C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
    • None
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading
    • None
    • None
    C1P012: Other
    • None
    C1P012: Other (if any)
    Summary

    Authors (framework concept)

    Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

    Contributors (to the content)

    Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

    Implemented by

    Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
    Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)