Search
Close this search box.
Search
Map View
Table View
Projects
Filters:
Clear Filters Export All Entries (CSV)
NameProjectTypeCompare
Örebro-Vivalla JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Texel JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hällefors, Sweden JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Uncompare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lecce, SmartEnCity SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Firenze, Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Uncompare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Uncompare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Uncompare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleGroningen, PED North
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka
«×»
Ankara, Çamlık District
«×»
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport)
«×»
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet)
«×»
Hunziker Areal, Zürich
«×»
Graz, Reininghausgründe
«×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabGroningen, PED NorthIzmir, District of KarşıyakaAnkara, Çamlık DistrictNyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport)Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet)Hunziker Areal, ZürichGraz, Reininghausgründe
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynoyesyesyesyesnoyes
PED relevant case studynonoyesnonoyesno
PED Lab.yesnononononono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusyesyesyesnoyesnono
Energy communityyesnoyesnononono
Circularityyesnononononono
Air quality and urban comfortnoyesnonononono
Electrificationnonoyesnononono
Net-zero energy costnoyesyesnononono
Net-zero emissionyesnoyesyesnonono
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nonononononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynoyesyesnononono
Othernononoyesnoyesno
Other (A1P004)Energy efficient; Sustainable neighbourhood; Social aspects/affordabilityEnergy efficient; Sustainable neighbourhood; Social aspects/affordability According to the goals of 2000-Watt-Society (includes CO2 emissions max. 1 tonne per person per year)
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabImplementation PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhaseCompletedImplementation Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date12/1810/2210/2201/2001/2401/072019
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date12/2310/2509/2512/3312/172025
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets
  • GIS open datasets
A1P009: OtherOther
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
  • TNO, Hanze, RUG,
  • Ped noord book
    • E. Rainer, H. Schnitzer, T. Mach, T. Wieland, M. Reiter, L. Fickert, E. Schmautzer, A. Passer, H. Oblak, H. Kreiner, R. Lazar, M. Duschek, et al. (2015): Rahmenplan Energy City Graz-Reininghaus – Subprojekt 2 des Leitprojektes „ECR Energy City Graz – Reininghaus Online: Rahmenplan Energy City Graz-Reininghaus - Haus der Zukunft (nachhaltigwirtschaften.at),
    • H.Schnitzer et al. (2016): Arbeiten und Wohnen in der Smart City Reininghaus, Online: Arbeiten und Wohnen in Graz Reininghaus - Smartcities
    A1P011: Geographic coordinates
    X Coordinate (longitude):6.53512127.11004932.79536914.36316912.9898368.55977415.407440
    Y Coordinate (latitude):53.23484638.49605439.88181267.27195455.58400447.41412347.0607
    A1P012: Country
    A1P012: CountryNetherlandsTurkeyTurkeyNorwaySwedenSwitzerlandAustria
    A1P013: City
    A1P013: CityGroningenİzmirAnkaraBodøMalmöZürichGraz
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CfaCsaDsbDfcDfbCfbDfb
    A1P015: District boundary
    A1P015: District boundaryFunctionalGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographic
    Other
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:MixedPrivatePrivatePublicMixedPrivateMixed
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple Owners
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED721257100
    A1P019: Conditioned space
    A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]1.0110279522600
    A1P020: Total ground area
    A1P020: Total ground area [m²]17.1323260050800340000052170041.0001000000
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0300000
    A1P022: Financial schemes
    A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estateyesnononononoyes
    A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
    A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Otheryesnonononoyesno
    A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononononono
    A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingyesnononononoyes
    A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonononononono
    A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingyesnononoyesnoyes
    A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononono
    A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUyesyesyesnoyesnono
    A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]1193355
    A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnoyesyesnononono
    A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonononononono
    A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononono
    A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022: Other
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Job creation
    • Job creation,
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
    A1P023: Other
    A1P024: More comments:
    A1P024: More comments:The urban morphology of Çamlık District differs in several ways, compared with the typical urban fabric in Türkiye, along with the capital city of Ankara. The houses on the site are composed of three-story attached single-housing units with multiple rows, creating a total of 257 housing units in total. Low-rise buildings coupled with suitably oriented rooftop surfaces brings about significant advantages in the site. Dense greenery in the site also results in reduced cooling energy demand in the buildings.The “Reininghausgründe” are a new quarter near the centre of the City of Graz. In the area of a former brewery, close to more, still working industries, a new town centre is being established. It will include living areas, workplaces, shops, schools and a park, so that the need for individual mobility is minimized. It is connected to the city centre by bike paths, busses and a tram. Car sharing is provided as well. Some key-energy aspects: • characteristic 1: For the heat supply in the innovative Reininghaus energy model, low-temperature waste heat from a nearby steel plant is harnessed through the use of heat pumps. • characteristic 2: The district heating system operates at low temperatures. • characteristic 3: Generated heat that is not used immediately is stored in the power tower and supplied on demand. Other important aspects of the project are the following: • characteristic 1: Most houses are low-energy houses, some of the certified with the “Klima Aktiv” label • characteristic 2: There are extremely few parking possibilities for residents and visitors; this will foster the use of public transport and bikes • characteristic 3: All the necessary infrastructure for the “daily need” can be reached within walking distance The area of the project is going to be very “green” when finished. Featuring a big district parc, lots of other green spaces are in planning.
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]
    Contact person for general enquiries
    A1P026: NameJasper Tonen, Elisabeth KoopsOzlem SenyolProf. Dr. İpek Gürsel DİNOChristoph GollnerChristoffer OriniusChristoph GollnerKatharina Schwarz
    A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of GroningenKarsiyaka MunicipalityMiddle East Technical UniversityFFGThe City of MalmöFFGStadtLABOR, Innovationen für urbane Lebensqualität GmbH
    A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityOtherMunicipality / Public BodiesOtherSME / Industry
    A1P028: Other
    A1P029: EmailJasper.tonen@groningen.nlozlemkocaer2@gmail.comipekg@metu.edu.trchristoph.gollner@ffg.atChristoffer.orinius@malmo.sechristoph.gollner@ffg.atkatharina.schwarz@stadtlaborgraz.at
    Contact person for other special topics
    A1P030: NameHasan Burak CavkaAssoc. Prof. Onur TaylanHans Schnitzer
    A1P031: Emailhasancavka@iyte.edu.trotaylan@metu.edu.trhans.schnitzer@stadtlaborgraz.at
    Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
    A2P001: Fields of application
    A2P001: Fields of application
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
    • Waste management
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.)
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy production,
    • Construction materials
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • Digital technologies
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy production,
    • Construction materials
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
    • Water use,
    • Indoor air quality,
    • Other
    A2P001: OtherUrban Management; Air Quality
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streamsMethods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4). In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED.The energy consumption and efficiency of the energy model of Çamlık Site, created using EnergyPlus software, have been evaluated under the scenarios specified below. At each stage, a new system was incorporated to explore the potential of the area becoming a PED. In this context, four scenarios were created to compare different energy scenarios for the Ankara pilot area and to observe the impact of the included systems on energy efficiency: V_base; V_ER; V_ER,HP; V_ER,HP,PV. The basic scenario (V_base) was created using the current state without any improvement to the building envelope. This scenario was developed to determine the annual energy needs of the entire site without any intervention and serves as a reference point for the other developed models. The second scenario (V_ER) was created to improve the building envelopes of all residential units in the area, altering the U-values according to Türkiye's current building standards (TS-825). The third scenario (V_ER,HP) primarily includes a heat pump model that can use electrical energy to produce higher thermal energy and is added on top of the improvements in the second scenario. Finally, the V_ER,HP,PV scenario combines building envelope improvements, the heat pump, and the solar PV system.Energy efficiency: o Several activities: Workshops, Webinars to deepen the knowledge and raise awareness renewable energies o for example rooftop Photovoltaics green & blue infrastructures o Parks, Rooftop Gardens, Quarter Parks, Water elements included in the parks rooftop farming o To produce vegetables in the quarter stormwater management mobility o less parking and less cars in the district. Solutions for boosting public transport with sponsored public transport tickets; building of better bike and pedestrian infrastructure social aspects o district management was established in the district local supply of goods of daily need o Schools within 15 minutes walking distance Supermarkets and other shops within the district
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoYesYesNo
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesYesYes
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNoYes
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationMobility, till now, is not included in the energy model.Mobility is not included in the calculations.Mobility is not included in the calculations.- Number of cars per household - Fraction of electric cars - Number of public transport tickets (week/ annual tickets)
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]2.33.8623.44611.9
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.331.2260.5289.2
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P011: PVnoyesyesnononoyes
    A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]1.0283.4240
    A2P011: Windnonononononono
    A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Hydrononononononono
    A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Biomass_elnonononononono
    A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: PVT_elnonononononono
    A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Othernonononononono
    A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P012: Geothermalyesnononononoyes
    A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Solar Thermalyesnononononoyes
    A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Biomass_heatyesnononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.1
    A2P012: Waste heat+HPyesnononononoyes
    A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: PVT_thyesnononononono
    A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Othernonononononono
    A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesGeothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centersGroundwater (used for heat pumps)
    A2P014: Annual energy use
    A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]5.0883.976
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P017: Gasnoyesyesnononono
    A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Coalnonononononono
    A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Oilnonononononono
    A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Othernonononononono
    A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P018: PVnoyesnonononoyes
    A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.707
    A2P018: Windnonononononoyes
    A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Hydrononononononoyes
    A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_elnonononononono
    A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
    A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
    A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Othernonononononono
    A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
    A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononoyes
    A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_heatnonononononoyes
    A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonononononoyes
    A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
    A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Othernonononononono
    A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary01.454031117397500000
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]0.036
    A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
    A2P022: Safety & Security
    A2P022: Health
    A2P022: Education
    A2P022: MobilityMode of transport; Access to public transportx
    A2P022: EnergyEnergy efficiency in buildings; Net energy need; Gross energy need; Total energy needyearly energy balancex
    A2P022: Waterx
    A2P022: Economic developmentx
    A2P022: Housing and CommunityDelivery and proximity to amenitiesx
    A2P022: Waste
    A2P022: OtherGHG emissions; Power/load; Life cycle cost (LCC); Demographic needs and consultation plan; Public Space
    A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
    A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesyesyesnoyesyesyes
    A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsyesnonoyesnonono
    A2P023: Wind Turbinesnonononononono
    A2P023: Geothermal energy systemyesnonoyesnonono
    A2P023: Waste heat recoveryyesnonoyesyesnoyes
    A2P023: Waste to energyyesnononononono
    A2P023: Polygenerationnonononononono
    A2P023: Co-generationnonononononono
    A2P023: Heat Pumpyesyesyesyesnonoyes
    A2P023: Hydrogennonononononono
    A2P023: Hydropower plantnonononononono
    A2P023: Biomassnonononononono
    A2P023: Biogasnonononononono
    A2P023: Other
    A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
    A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)yesnononononoyes
    A2P024: Energy management systemyesnononoyesnono
    A2P024: Demand-side managementyesnononoyesnono
    A2P024: Smart electricity gridnonononononono
    A2P024: Thermal Storageyesnononononoyes
    A2P024: Electric Storageyesnononoyesnono
    A2P024: District Heating and Coolingyesnonoyesyesyesyes
    A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsyesnononoyesnono
    A2P024: P2P – buildingsnonononononono
    A2P024: Other
    A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
    A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnoyesyesnononono
    A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsyesnononononono
    A2P025: High-performance new buildingsyesnononoyesnoyes
    A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)yesnononononoyes
    A2P025: Urban data platformsyesnononononono
    A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnonononononoyes
    A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)noyesyesnononono
    A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononononoyes
    A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonononononono
    A2P025: Smart surveillancenonononononono
    A2P025: Other
    A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
    A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nonononononoyes
    A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)nonononononoyes
    A2P026: e-Mobilityyesnononononoyes
    A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnonononononoyes
    A2P026: Car-free areanonononononoyes
    A2P026: Other
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes- Multimodal mobility nodes - Support of public transport tickets - Mobility consulting - District management
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesNoNoYes
    A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance CertificateEnergieausweis mandatory if buildings/ flats/ apartments are sold
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoYesYes
    A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesKlaus-Novy-Preis 2017 (Gold), World Habitat Award 2016-2017Klimaaktiv standard  Voluntary! Certification can be for buildings and/or quarters. The different quarters are built in different standards. Ranging from bronze/silver/gold
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • New development strategies,
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Smart cities strategies,
    • Urban Renewal Strategies
    • Smart cities strategies,
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyKarşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030. System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023.City level targets Klimaschutzplan Graz - 2022 | Targets: - Climate neutrality until 2040 - Social justice and high quality of life - High innovation levels Mobilitätsplan Graz 2040 – under development | Targets: - Modal Split 80:20 until 2040 80% Public transport, bike, walking | 20% cars Kommunales Energiekonzept (2017) | Targets: - Increase of district heating Energiemasterplan Graz (2018) | Targets: - Energy efficiency of urban dwellings and infrastructures - District heating and solar energy - Energy efficiency of private dwellings - Climate conscious mobility National level targets Klimaschutzplan Österreich -draft, expected by 2024 | Targets: - Decarbonisation (reduction of GHG, renewable energies, - Climate neutrality until 2040 - Energy efficiency - Security of energy supply
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
    • Electrification of Cooking Methods,
    • Biogas
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
    • Electrification of Cooking Methods,
    • Biogas
    A3P003: Other
    A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
    A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesAccording to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario.According to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary with heat pumps. Rooftop photovoltaic panels also have the potential for renewable energy generation. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity through this scenario.Reininghaus needs green spaces and places Sector coupling of water, waste water, electricity ICT and demand side management Mobility - Reininghaus needs better infrastructure for bikes and pedestrians - Public transportation should be more affordable and Sharing should be implemented in the district Infrastructure should cover daily needs within walking distance Infrastructure for local jobs and shared offices
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviourIn Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed.- citizen participation and promotion of functioning neighbourhoods (e.g., through city district management) As of today, solutions for the energy transition in the residential sector have focused on the construction of energy-efficient buildings and on the energy-efficient refurbishment of existing buildings. Measures to influence user behaviour and to directly address residents and neighbourhoods as actors of the energy transition play a minor role and are also not formalized. At the same time, moving into a new apartment offers a ‘window of opportunity’ to establish new everyday practices and behaviour. In already inhabited housing developments, well-functioning neighbourhoods or existing, ‘sustainability pioneers’ are key to motivating people to adopt more resource-efficient lifestyles. In order to prepare such agents of change towards more climate protection and sustainability in the context of housing, Austria launched the BAREWO project. The aim is to develop a kit of formats, methods, and interventions for resource-efficient housing. This toolkit will be tested in six testbeds, among which quarter 12 (Q12) of Graz- Reininghaus, as soon as first residents move in (approx. 2024). Austrian TRANS-PED partner StadtLABOR, which is also a partner in the BAREWO project, will support Q12 in this process. In parallel, a monitoring system will be developed to make the (climate) effects of the kit measurable. In addition, a guideline for property managers will be developed, which will serve as an orientation for them on how their residents can be coached in matters of climate protection and sustainability in everyday (residential) life. From the very beginning, (communication) measures are implemented and relevant stakeholders are involved in the project (project advisory board) to ensure the multiplicability, financing and broad application of the toolkit. If successful, the toolkit could also be scaled up to other quarters in Reininghaus.
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    • Innovative business models,
    • Blockchain
    • Innovative business models
    • PPP models,
    • Local trading
    A3P006: Other
    A3P007: Social models
    A3P007: Social models
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Citizen Social Research,
    • Prevention of energy poverty,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Affordability
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Affordability
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Quality of Life,
    • Strategies towards social mix
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Social incentives,
    • Quality of Life,
    • Affordability,
    • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
    A3P007: Other
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • District Energy plans,
    • City Vision 2050,
    • SECAP Updates
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
    • District Energy plans,
    • SECAP Updates
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
    • District Energy plans
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • District Energy plans
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • City Vision 2050,
    • Building / district Certification
    A3P008: Other
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    • Energy Neutral
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Low Emission Zone,
    • Pollutants Reduction
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Low Emission Zone
    • Energy Neutral
    • Pollutants Reduction,
    • Greening strategies,
    • Sustainable Urban drainage systems (SUDS),
    • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
    A3P009: OtherEnergy Positive, Low Emission Zone
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsAt national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen:  Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation.  Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries.  The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals.  Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricityMobility contracts: A mobility contract is concluded between the City of Graz and the property developers in the course of development plans and serves to reduce the motor vehicle traffic to be expected as a result of the construction project. Push & pull measures are agreed: With a lower car parking space key, which is significantly lower than today's usual requirements, offers and information for easier use of public transport, walking and cycling, as well as car sharing and e-mobility are simultaneously created by the property developers, leading to a win-win-win situation for all parties involved. Basic principles - Possibility of combining effective "push & pull" measures => control option (e.g. reduction of car parking spaces, but optimisation of accessibility to public transport and walking and cycling networks, public transport tickets, mobility information, ... etc.) - Changing mobility behaviour in favour of sustainable forms of transport from the moment the flat is handed over ("upheaval" in personal mobility behaviour when changing the residential location) - Reduction in construction and maintenance costs (underground car parks, public road infrastructure) - Easier realisation of larger construction projects in the inner city area with lower generation of vehicle demand Städtebauliche Verträge in Graz / Urban development contracts in Graz Qualitative urban (neighbourhood) development with added value for all stakeholders: urban development contracts are modern instruments in the development of cities and neighbourhoods. As one of the pioneers in this field, the City of Graz also increasingly favours this form of quality assurance. Urban development contracts are a contractual form of regulation between the City of Graz and landowners, which enables flexible control of urban (sub)development in the interests of the common interests while at the same time relieving the public authorities. The contracts make property-related stipulations in accordance with urban planning requirements (e.g. urban development concept, development concept, framework plan, zoning plan) and the specialist planning requirements in particular infrastructure, development, design and mobility. This is intended to infrastructure, services of general interest, building land quality and settlement development required for the (parts of the) city.
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionThe pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED).Çamlık District, unlike many other districts in Ankara, has a specific urban morphology that draws near the other pilot zones considered by the partners of PED-ACT. The site has three-storey single housing units, along with a fair amount of greenery around. Furthermore, the roof areas enable large amounts of PV installment, which results in higher amounts of local renewable energy potential. Therefore, the district is a good fit for PED development.Reininghaus addresses some relevant key aspects listed in the JPI UE PED Framework Definition such as: - high level of aspiration in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production; - integration of different systems and infrastructures; - inclusion of aspects not only related to energy sector, but also connected with social, economic and environmental sustainability.
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentPED-ACT project.The Reininghausgründe is a new quarter near the centre of the City of Graz. On the area of a former brewery, close to more, still working industries, a new town centre is being established. The quarter will include living areas, workplaces, shops, schools and a park, so that the need for individual mobility is minimized. It is connected to the historical city centre by bike paths, busses and a tram. Car sharing is provided as well.
    B1P003: Environment of the case study area
    B2P003: Environment of the case study areaUrban areaSuburban areaSuburban areaUrban areaUrban area
    B1P004: Type of district
    B2P004: Type of district
    • Renovation
    • Renovation
    • New construction
    • New construction
    • New construction
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Retrofitting Area
    • New Development
    • Re-use / Transformation Area,
    • New Development
    • New Development
    B1P006: Year of construction
    B1P006: Year of construction200519862025
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential0
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential10000
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential0
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
    B1P011: Population density before intervention
    B1P011: Population density before intervention0000000
    B1P012: Population density after intervention
    B1P012: Population density after intervention0000000.01
    B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
    B1P013: Residentialnoyesyesnononono
    B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]10279550800
    B1P013: Officenonononononono
    B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Industry and Utilitynononononoyesyes
    B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Commercialnonononononono
    B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Institutionalnonononononono
    B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Natural areasnonononononoyes
    B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Recreationalnonononononono
    B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Dismissed areasnonononononono
    B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Othernonononononono
    B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
    B1P014: Residentialnoyesyesyesnoyesyes
    B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]10279550800
    B1P014: Officenononononoyesyes
    B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Industry and Utilitynononononoyesno
    B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Commercialnononononoyesyes
    B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Institutionalnonononononoyes
    B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Natural areasnonononononoyes
    B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Recreationalnononononoyesyes
    B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononononono
    B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Othernononoyesnonono
    B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionGroningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city.
    B2P002: Installation life time
    B2P002: Installation life timeThe MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact.
    B2P003: Scale of action
    B2P003: ScaleDistrict
    B2P004: Operator of the installation
    B2P004: Operator of the installationThe Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties.
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materialsGroningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materials
    B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
    B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?No
    B2P006: Other
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    • Civic
    B2P007: Other
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipality
    B2P008: Other
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    • Academia,
    • Private,
    • Industrial,
    • Other
    B2P009: Otherresearch companies, monitoring company, ict company
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    • Buildings,
    • Demand-side management,
    • Energy storage,
    • Energy networks,
    • Waste management,
    • Lighting,
    • E-mobility,
    • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
    • Social interactions,
    • Business models
    B2P011: Other
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    • Tools for prototyping and modelling
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    • Execution plan,
    • Available data,
    • Type of measured data,
    • Equipment,
    • Level of access
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    • Energy,
    • Social,
    • Economical / Financial
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P017: Capacities
    B2P017: Capacities
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P019: Available tools
    • Energy modelling,
    • Social models,
    • Business and financial models
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P020: External accessibility
    B2P020: External accessibility
    C1P001: Unlocking Factors
    C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
    C1P002: Driving Factors
    C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)Earthquakes due to gas extraction
    C1P003: Administrative barriers
    C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
    C1P004: Policy barriers
    C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
    C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
    C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Non-effective regulations3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
    C1P006: Environmental barriers
    C1P006: Environmental barriers- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 - Water Scarcity: 1- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Water Scarcity: 1 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1
    C1P007: Technical barriers
    C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P007: Deficient planning2 - Slightly important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Lack of well-defined process3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
    C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
    C1P008: Inertia2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P008: Rebound effect2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
    C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
    C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
    C1P010: Financial barriers
    C1P010: Hidden costs2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P010: Risk and uncertainty3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
    C1P011: Market barriers
    C1P011: Split incentives5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P011: Energy price distortion4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
    C1P012: Stakeholders involved
    C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Research & Innovation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Financial/Funding
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Business process management
    • Planning/leading
    • None
    C1P012: Urban Services providers
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Real Estate developers
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Design/Construction companies
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
    • None
    • Design/demand aggregation
    C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Other
    • None
    C1P012: Other (if any)
    Summary

    Authors (framework concept)

    Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

    Contributors (to the content)

    Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

    Implemented by

    Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
    Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

    Join the Action

    PED-EU-NET is an open, interdisciplinary and growing network welcoming academics, practitioners and relevant stakeholders to contribute to the activities of the work plan.
    Join Now

    COST

    COST is an EU funding programme that enables researchers to set up their interdisciplinary research networks in Europe and beyond. We provide funds for organising conferences, meetings, training schools, short scientific exchanges or other networking activities in a wide range of scientific topics. By creating open spaces where people and ideas can grow, we unlock the full potential of science.

    PED-EU-NET

    The COST Action Positive Energy Districts European Network (PED-EU-NET) aims to mobilise researchers and other relevant stakeholders across different domains and sectors to drive the deployment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Europe through open sharing of knowledge, exchange of ideas, pooling of resources, experimentation of new methods and co-creation of novel solutions.

    Action Details

    Grant Holder
    Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome

    Start of Action: 10 September 2020
    End of Action: 09 September 2024
    CSO approval date: 24/03/2020

    © 2021-2023 PED-EU-NET COST Action CA19126. All rights reserved.