PED DB: Case Studies – PED-EU-NET

Filters:

Name	Project	Type	Compare
Örebro-Vivalla	JUST PEPP	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger	JUST PEPP	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Texel	JUST PEPP	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Hällefors, Sweden	JUST PEPP	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Pamplona	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente	COPPER	PED Lab	Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet)	PED StepWise	PED Case Study	Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park	PED StepWise	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten	PED StepWise	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg	HeatCOOP	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH	HeatCOOP	PED Lab	Compare
Tartu, Annelinn	V2G-QUESTS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland	V2G-QUESTS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district	V2G-QUESTS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Lecce, SmartEnCity	SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
STARDUST, Trento	STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities	PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Uncompare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern		PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Firenze, Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0,		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo		PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Uncompare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna		PED Case Study	Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento		PED Case Study	Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna		PED Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB)	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Võru +CityxChange		PED Case Study	Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Furuset project, Oslo	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights		PED Case Study	Compare
Ydalir project	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport)	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Fornebu, Bærum	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou		PED Case Study	Compare
Smart Energy Åland		PED Case Study	Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED	ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts	PED Case Study	Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED	InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts	PED Case Study	Uncompare
Munich, Harthof district		PED Case Study	Compare
Lublin	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran	CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116	CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Findhorn, the Park	InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts	PED Case Study	Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED	ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Case Study	Compare
Aalborg East		PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Uncompare
Ankara, Çamlık District	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Trenčín	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf	LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis	NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts	PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods	PED Case Study	Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Zaragoza, Actur	NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand	BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts	PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city	ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins	PED Case Study	Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Case Study	Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus	LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Espoo, Kera	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee	PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district	PED Case Study	Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe		PED Case Study	Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district		PED Case Study	Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark		PED Case Study	Compare
Évora, Portugal	POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework	PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Groningen, PED South	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Lab	Compare
Groningen, PED North	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Lab
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Lab	Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT		PED Lab	Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district	STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Uncompare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Case Study	Uncompare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Case Study	Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods	PED Case Study	Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods	PED Case Study	Compare
Tartu, City centre area	SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe	PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district	GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab		PED Lab	Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Case Study	Compare
Kifissia, Energy community	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare

Title	Groningen, PED North	Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center «×»	Aalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, Denmark «×»	Trento, STARDUST «×»	Romania, Alba Iulia PED «×»	Smart Otaniemi, Espoo «×»	Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga «×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab	Groningen, PED North	Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center	Aalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, Denmark	Trento, STARDUST	Romania, Alba Iulia PED	Smart Otaniemi, Espoo	Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2022/09/netherlands.JPG, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2022/09/netherlands2.jpg	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2022/08/Fig.3_City-of-Espoo_Leppavaara-district_Sello-center.png, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2022/08/Fig.2_City-of-Espoo_Leppavaara-district_Sello-center.png, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2022/08/Fig.1_City-of-Espoo_Leppavaara-district_Sello-center.png	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/07/Picture.png	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/ICT_imagefull.png	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/Picture3.jpg	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/Smart-Otaniemi-Key-player-1.png	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2022/08/3.jpg, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2022/08/2.jpg, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2022/08/1.jpg
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case study	no	yes	no	no	yes	no	yes
PED relevant case study	no	no	yes	yes	no	yes	no
PED Lab.	yes	no	yes	yes	no	yes	no
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutrality	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes
Annual energy surplus	yes	no	no	no	yes	no	no
Energy community	yes	no	no	no	yes	no	yes
Circularity	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
Air quality and urban comfort	no	no	no	no	yes	no	no
Electrification	no	no	no	no	yes	no	no
Net-zero energy cost	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
Net-zero emission	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)	no	no	no	no	yes	no	no
Maximise self-sufficiency	no	yes	yes	no	yes	no	no
Other	no	no	no	yes	no	yes	no
Other (A1P004)				Energy neutral; Energy efficient; Sustainable neighbourhood		Social aspects/affordability; societal development, innovation capabilities, export businesses; new investing possibilities
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED Lab	Implementation Phase	Implementation Phase	Planning Phase	Completed	Implementation Phase	In operation	Planning Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date	12/18	09/19	11/22	10/17	01/24	01/18	01/20
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date	12/23	10/22	11/25	03/24	12/26		12/22
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future,	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS,		STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities,	InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts,		MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future,
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability	Monitoring data available within the districts, Open data city platform – different dashboards, GIS open datasets	Monitoring data available within the districts, General statistical datasets	Monitoring data available within the districts, GIS open datasets		Monitoring data available within the districts, General statistical datasets, GIS open datasets		Monitoring data available within the districts, Meteorological open data, General statistical datasets, GIS open datasets
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab	TNO, Hanze, RUG, Ped noord book	M. Hukkalainen, F. Zarrin, K. Klobut, O. Lindholm, M. Ranta, P. Hajduk, T. Vainio-Kaila, E. Wanne, J. Tartia, H. Horn, K. Kontu, J. Juhmen, S. Santala, R. Turtiainen, J. Töyräs, T. Koljonen. (2020). Deliverable D3.1 Detailed plan of the Espoo smart city lighthouse demonstrations. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2020-09/SPARCS_D3.1_Detailed_plan_Espoo.pdf, Hukkalainen, Zarrin Fatima, Krzysztof Klobut, Kalevi Piira, Mikaela Ranta, Petr Hajduk, Tiina Vainio-Kaila , Elina Wanne, Jani Tartia, Angela Bartel, Joni Mäkinen, Mia Kaurila, Kaisa Kontu, Jaano Juhmen, Merja Ryöppy, Reetta Turtiainen, Joona Töyräs, Timo Koljonen (2021) Deliverable 3.2 Midterm report on the implemented demonstrations of solutions for energy positive blocks in Espoo. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2022-02/SPARCS_D3.2.pdf	https://greenhubdenmark.dk/en/flexposts/	https://www.comune.trento.it/Aree-tematiche/Smart-city/Progetti-d-innovazione-conclusi/Stardust/Stardust-che-cos-e, https://stardustproject.eu/cities/trento/	Historical sources, GIS of the municipality, Basic BEMs	https://smartotaniemi.fi/	Alpagut, B., Lopez Romo, A., Hernández, P., Tabanoğlu, O., & Hermoso Martinez, N. (2021). A GIS-Based Multicriteria Assessment for Identification of Positive Energy Districts Boundary in Cities. Energies, 14(22), 7517.
A1P011: Geographic coordinates
X Coordinate (longitude):	6.535121	24.8101	10.007	11.134148	23.580112098023235	24.830265	29.02631952687517
Y Coordinate (latitude):	53.234846	60.2179	57.041028	46.041160	46.077015278680115	60.183989	40.98841395247461
A1P012: Country
A1P012: Country	Netherlands	Finland	Denmark	Italy	Romania	Finland	Turkey
A1P013: City
A1P013: City	Groningen	Espoo	Aalborg	Trento	Alba Iulia	Espoo	Istanbul
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).	Cfa	Dfb	Dfb	Cfb	Dfb	Dfb	Csb
A1P015: District boundary
A1P015: District boundary	Functional	Geographic	Virtual		Functional		Geographic
Other					Geographic
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:	Mixed		Public	Mixed	Public	Mixed	Mixed
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:	Multiple Owners	Multiple Owners	Multiple Owners	Multiple Owners	Single Owner	Multiple Owners	Multiple Owners
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED	7	5			6		13
A1P019: Conditioned space
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]	1.01	267956					116052
A1P020: Total ground area
A1P020: Total ground area [m²]	17.132	53000	31308000		8423.45		1151727
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area	0	5	0	0	0	0	0
A1P022: Financial schemes
A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estate	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO scheme	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Other	yes	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]						39000000
A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural funding	no	no	no	yes	yes	no	no
A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National funding	yes	no	no	no	yes	no	no
A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional funding	no	no	no	no	yes	no	no
A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal funding	yes	no	no	no	yes	no	no
A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EU	yes	yes	no	no	no	no	yes
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]		629000
A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - National	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regional	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Other	no	no	no	yes	no	yes	no
A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]						27000000
A1P022: Other				Green financing
A1P023: Economic Targets
A1P023: Economic Targets	Boosting local businesses, Boosting local and sustainable production	Job creation, Positive externalities, Boosting local businesses	Positive externalities, Boosting local businesses, Boosting local and sustainable production		Job creation, Positive externalities, Other		Job creation, Positive externalities, Other
A1P023: Other					Boosting sustainability for public schools		Boosting new investors to the area, - Increasing the touristic value of area and urban mobility at the area, - Increasing the regional value (housing price, etc.), - Providing economic advantages by switching to positive energy production
A1P024: More comments:
A1P024: More comments:
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]					3.5
Contact person for general enquiries
A1P026: Name	Jasper Tonen, Elisabeth Koops	Jaano Juhmen	Kristian Olesen	Christoph Gollner	Tudor Drâmbărean	Christoph Gollner	Mr. Dogan UNERI
A1P027: Organization	Municipality of Groningen	SIEMENS - Data Center Forum	Aalborg University	FFG	Municipality of Alba Iulia	FFG	Municipality of Kadikoy
A1P028: Affiliation	Municipality / Public Bodies	SME / Industry	Research Center / University	Other	Municipality / Public Bodies	Other	Municipality / Public Bodies
A1P028: Other					Maria Elena Seemann
A1P029: Email	Jasper.tonen@groningen.nl	Jaano.juhmen@siemens.com	Kristian@plan.aau.dk	christoph.gollner@ffg.at	tudor.drambarean@apulum.ro	christoph.gollner@ffg.at	dogan.uneri@kadikoy.bel.tr
Contact person for other special topics
A1P030: Name			Alex Søgaard Moreno		Maria-Elena Seemann		Mrs. Damla MUHCU YILMAZ
A1P031: Email			asm@aalborg.dk		maria.seemann@apulum.roapul		damla.muhcu@kadikoy.bel.tr
Pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
A2P001: Fields of application
A2P001: Fields of application	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production, E-mobility, Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.), Waste management		Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production, Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.), Digital technologies	Energy efficiency, Energy production, Digital technologies	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production, E-mobility, Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.), Digital technologies, Construction materials	Digital technologies	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production, E-mobility, Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.), Digital technologies
A2P001: Other
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields	Energy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streams		Stakeholder engagement, expert energy system analysis, future scenarios		Thermal rehabilitation of the main building, and investments in the energy efficiency and consumption fields.
A2P003: Application of ISO52000
A2P003: Application of ISO52000	No		No		Yes		Yes
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance	No		No		Yes		No
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance	No		No		No
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation	Mobility, till now, is not included in the energy model.		Large combined industrial, residential, and commercial area with complex flows of in- and outgoing traffic.		There will be 1 EV station placed nearby the main building. This would be the link to the mobility field.
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]	2.3		218		0.982		0.94
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]	0.33		148		0.048441		0.10
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P011: PV	no	no	no	no	yes	no	yes
A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]							0.51
A2P011: Wind	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Hydro	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: PVT_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Other	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P012: Geothermal	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Solar Thermal	yes	no	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]							0.08
A2P012: Biomass_heat	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]	0.1
A2P012: Waste heat+HP	yes	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]			300
A2P012: Biomass_peat_heat	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: PVT_th	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_firewood_th	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Other	no	no	no	no	yes	no	no
A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes	Geothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centers		Very little wind production currently exists in the area. The electricity production of the waste incineration plant will be included at a later date. Aalborg East is partly a remarkable area for hosting a Portland cement factory that accounts for a substantial share of Denmark’s total CO2 emissions. In turn, it also provides waste heat to the district heating grid for all of Aalborg city and some of the smaller towns that are connected to the same DH grid.		Only PVs - 940 PVs on the main building		Two scenarios are conducted regarding Kadikoy PED energy generation. For the second scenario, just 0.53GWh/annum PV production is proposed.
A2P014: Annual energy use
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]			620		0.000048441		0.74
A2P015: Annual energy delivered
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]			399		0.000113331		0.49
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]							0
A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P017: Gas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Coal	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Oil	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Other	no	no	yes	no	yes	no	no
A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]			300
A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P018: PV	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]							-0.26
A2P018: Wind	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Hydro	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_peat_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: PVT_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Other	no	no	no	no	yes	no	no
A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P019: Geothermal	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Solar Thermal	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_heat	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Waste heat+HP	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_peat_heat	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: PVT_th	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_firewood_th	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Other	no	no	no	no	yes	no	no
A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary	0	0	0	0	0	0	-2.2692307692308
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]
A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
A2P022: Safety & Security					yes
A2P022: Health					yes
A2P022: Education					yes
A2P022: Mobility					yes
A2P022: Energy					yes
A2P022: Water					yes
A2P022: Economic development					yes
A2P022: Housing and Community
A2P022: Waste
A2P022: Other
A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
A2P023: Photovoltaics	yes	no	yes	yes	yes	no	yes
A2P023: Solar thermal collectors	yes	no	yes	yes	yes	no	yes
A2P023: Wind Turbines	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Geothermal energy system	yes	no	no	yes	no	yes	no
A2P023: Waste heat recovery	yes	no	yes	yes	no	no	no
A2P023: Waste to energy	yes	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Polygeneration	no	no	no	no	yes	no	no
A2P023: Co-generation	no	no	no	no	yes	no	no
A2P023: Heat Pump	yes	no	yes	yes	yes	no	yes
A2P023: Hydrogen	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Hydropower plant	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Biomass	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Biogas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Other
A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)	yes	no	no	yes	yes	no	no
A2P024: Energy management system	yes	no	yes	no	yes	no	no
A2P024: Demand-side management	yes	no	yes	no	yes	no	no
A2P024: Smart electricity grid	no	no	yes	yes	yes	no	no
A2P024: Thermal Storage	yes	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P024: Electric Storage	yes	no	yes	no	yes	no	no
A2P024: District Heating and Cooling	yes	no	yes	yes	no	yes	no
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systems	yes	no	yes	yes	yes	no	no
A2P024: P2P – buildings	no	no	no	no	yes	no	no
A2P024: Other
A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
A2P025: Deep Retrofitting	no	no	yes	no	yes	no	no
A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildings	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: High-performance new buildings	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)	yes	no	no	yes	yes	no	no
A2P025: Urban data platforms	yes	no	no	no	yes	no	no
A2P025: Mobile applications for citizens	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)	no	no	no	no	yes	no	no
A2P025: Smart irrigation	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposal	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Smart surveillance	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Other
A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)	no	no	no	yes	yes	no	no
A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)	no	no	no	no	yes	no	no
A2P026: e-Mobility	yes	no	no	yes	yes	no	no
A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutions	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P026: Car-free area	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P026: Other
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes					The new mobility plan integrates the PED area
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates	Yes		Yes		Yes		No
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes	Energy Performance Certificate
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates			No		Yes		No
A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy	Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.), New development strategies, National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality		Smart cities strategies, Urban Renewal Strategies, New development strategies, National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality	Smart cities strategies, Urban Renewal Strategies, Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.)	Smart cities strategies, Urban Renewal Strategies, Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.), New development strategies, Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC), Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract), National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality	Smart cities strategies	Urban Renewal Strategies, Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.), Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract), National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy			Reduction of 1018000 tons CO2 by 2030		40% reduction in emissions by 2030 according to the Covenant of Mayors
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid	Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps, Electrification of Cooking Methods, Biogas		Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps, Biogas		Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps		Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps, Electrification of Cooking Methods
A3P003: Other
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities			Decarbonize part of Aalborg city as a way of working incrementally towards being a zero-emission city.		- Thermal rehabilitation - Heat pumps - Smart system capable o various connections and data export - Usage of the energy produced by PVs placed on 3 buildings within the PED
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour	In Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed.		- Stakeholder engagement; - Focus on implementing renewable energy production where possible; - Rretrofitting and energy optimization of existing buildings.		- Education - Replacement of the non-performant PVs - Professional maintenance of the PV system - Reduce of consumptions - Intelligent systems to recover heat - Intelligent system to permit the usage of domestic water from the heating system
A3P006: Economic strategies
A3P006: Economic strategies	Innovative business models, Blockchain		Life Cycle Cost, Circular economy models	Innovative business models	Open data business models, Innovative business models, Life Cycle Cost, Circular economy models, Demand management Living Lab	Innovative business models	Innovative business models, PPP models, Circular economy models, Demand management Living Lab, Local trading
A3P006: Other
A3P007: Social models
A3P007: Social models	Strategies towards (local) community-building, Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies, Citizen Social Research, Prevention of energy poverty, Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance		Strategies towards (local) community-building, Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies, Policy Forums, Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance	Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies	Strategies towards (local) community-building, Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies, Behavioural Change / End-users engagement, Citizen Social Research, Policy Forums, Social incentives, Quality of Life, Strategies towards social mix, Affordability, Prevention of energy poverty, Digital Inclusion, Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance, Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)		Strategies towards (local) community-building, Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies, Behavioural Change / End-users engagement, Citizen Social Research, Prevention of energy poverty, Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
A3P007: Other
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies	Strategic urban planning, District Energy plans, City Vision 2050, SECAP Updates		Strategic urban planning, District Energy plans		Strategic urban planning, District Energy plans, City Vision 2050, SECAP Updates, Building / district Certification		Strategic urban planning, Digital twinning and visual 3D models, District Energy plans, City Vision 2050, SECAP Updates
A3P008: Other
A3P009: Environmental strategies
A3P009: Environmental strategies	Energy Neutral		Energy Neutral, Net zero carbon footprint	Energy Neutral	Energy Neutral, Low Emission Zone, Net zero carbon footprint, Carbon-free, Life Cycle approach, Pollutants Reduction, Greening strategies, Sustainable Urban drainage systems (SUDS), Cool Materials, Nature Based Solutions (NBS)	Energy Neutral	Energy Neutral, Low Emission Zone, Net zero carbon footprint
A3P009: Other
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects	At national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen:  Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation.  Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries.  The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals.  Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricity		Current energy tariffs disincentivize both individual and collective PV systems – meaning energy communities are not economically feasible, housing associations and public buildings struggle with finding a secure RoI for solar panels, and citizens and local industry lack an incentive to install solar panels on their own
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition			The large scale provides interesting opportunities for both urban development and strategic energy planning; the diverse mix of buildings and functions also allow for interesting discussions regarding PEDs. Another interesting facet is that the district heating grid is almost fully supplied by waste heat.		Positive energy district
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development			The area has an interesting history of development and has recently undergone several urban improvements. This is coupled with a strong local network of business owners and other stakeholders, all with an interest in developing the area in the best way possible. This made for an interesting case from a planning perspective to investigate how this network would pick up on the concept of PED and whether they could see any potential utility in relation to their everyday experiences.		Creation of an area which aims to be sustainable in terms of energy sufficiency and efficiency.
B1P003: Environment of the case study area
B2P003: Environment of the case study area			Suburban area	Suburban area	Urban area	Urban area	Urban area
B1P004: Type of district
B2P004: Type of district			Renovation	Renovation	Renovation	New construction, Renovation	Renovation
B1P005: Case Study Context
B1P005: Case Study Context			Retrofitting Area	Retrofitting Area	Retrofitting Area	Re-use / Transformation Area, New Development	Re-use / Transformation Area, Retrofitting Area
B1P006: Year of construction
B1P006: Year of construction					1976
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential			16.931				23.379
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P011: Population density before intervention
B1P011: Population density before intervention	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
B1P012: Population density after intervention
B1P012: Population density after intervention	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
B1P013: Residential	no	no	no	yes	no	no	yes
B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Office	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Industry and Utility	no	no	no	yes	no	no	no
B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Commercial	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Institutional	no	no	no	no	yes	no	no
B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Natural areas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Recreational	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Dismissed areas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]							Cultural Center, Sports Center / Total building and land use data of neigborhood 13,878 residential, 4,441 commercial using before intervention. For project area & 49 building area m2
B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
B1P014: Residential	no	no	no	yes	no	no	yes
B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Office	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Industry and Utility	no	no	no	yes	no	no	no
B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Commercial	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Institutional	no	no	no	no	yes	no	no
B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Natural areas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Recreational	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Dismissed areas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition	Groningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city.		An ongoing process and dialogue with local stakeholders to determine the future development of the area.
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P002: Installation life time	The MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact.		No new installation will be made throughout the project. Rather the project will attempt to establish a local PED network with the aim of empowering the stakeholders to better engage with sustainable technologies.
B2P003: Scale of action
B2P003: Scale	District		District			District
B2P004: Operator of the installation
B2P004: Operator of the installation	The Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties.		Kristian Olesen
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials	Groningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materials		Replication is primarily focused on the establishment of a local network with an interest in and understanding of PED.
B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?	No		No
B2P006: Other
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab	Civic		Civic
B2P007: Other
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab	Municipality		Research center/University
B2P008: Other
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab	Academia, Private, Industrial, Other		Academia, Private			Academia, Private
B2P009: Other	research companies, monitoring company, ict company
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab	Buildings, Demand-side management, Energy storage, Energy networks, Waste management, Lighting, E-mobility, Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), Social interactions, Business models
B2P011: Other
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab	Tools for prototyping and modelling
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P014: Monitoring measures	Execution plan, Available data, Type of measured data, Equipment, Level of access
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P015: Key Performance indicators	Energy, Social, Economical / Financial
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P017: Capacities
B2P017: Capacities
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P019: Available tools
B2P019: Available tools	Energy modelling, Social models, Business and financial models
B2P019: Available tools
B2P020: External accessibility
B2P020: External accessibility
C1P001: Unlocking Factors
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
C1P002: Driving Factors
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important
C1P002: Economic growth need	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)	Earthquakes due to gas extraction
C1P003: Administrative barriers
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important
C1P003: Lack of public participation	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
C1P004: Policy barriers
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P005: Regulatory instability	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Non-effective regulations	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P007: Technical barriers
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P007: Deficient planning	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
C1P008: Inertia	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P008: Rebound effect	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
C1P010: Financial barriers
C1P010: Hidden costs	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P010: Economic crisis	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
C1P011: Market barriers
C1P011: Split incentives	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important
C1P011: Energy price distortion	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
C1P012: Stakeholders involved
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities	Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation				Planning/leading		Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation
C1P012: Research & Innovation	Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Monitoring/operation/management						Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: Financial/Funding	Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation						Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation
C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data	Design/demand aggregation, Monitoring/operation/management						Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Business process management	Planning/leading						None
C1P012: Urban Services providers	Design/demand aggregation, Monitoring/operation/management						Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: Real Estate developers	Construction/implementation						None
C1P012: Design/Construction companies	Construction/implementation						Construction/implementation
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens	None						Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation, Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs	Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation						Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce	Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation, Monitoring/operation/management						Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation, Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Other
C1P012: Other (if any)
Summary

Authors (framework concept)

Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

Contributors (to the content)

Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

Implemented by

Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

Join the Action

COST

PED-EU-NET

Action Details