PED DB: Case Studies – PED-EU-NET

Filters:

Name	Project	Type	Compare
Örebro-Vivalla	JUST PEPP	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger	JUST PEPP	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Texel	JUST PEPP	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Hällefors, Sweden	JUST PEPP	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Pamplona	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente	COPPER	PED Lab	Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet)	PED StepWise	PED Case Study	Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park	PED StepWise	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten	PED StepWise	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg	HeatCOOP	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH	HeatCOOP	PED Lab	Compare
Tartu, Annelinn	V2G-QUESTS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland	V2G-QUESTS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district	V2G-QUESTS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce	SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
STARDUST, Trento	STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities	PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern		PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0,		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo		PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna		PED Case Study	Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento		PED Case Study	Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna		PED Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB)	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Võru +CityxChange		PED Case Study	Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Uncompare
Furuset project, Oslo	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Uncompare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights		PED Case Study	Compare
Ydalir project	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport)	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Fornebu, Bærum	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou		PED Case Study	Compare
Smart Energy Åland		PED Case Study	Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED	ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts	PED Case Study	Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED	InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts	PED Case Study	Uncompare
Munich, Harthof district		PED Case Study	Compare
Lublin	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran	CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116	CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Findhorn, the Park	InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts	PED Case Study	Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED	ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Case Study	Compare
Aalborg East		PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study	Uncompare
Trenčín	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf	LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis	NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts	PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods	PED Case Study	Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Zaragoza, Actur	NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand	BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts	PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city	ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins	PED Case Study	Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Case Study	Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus	LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Espoo, Kera	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee	PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district	PED Case Study	Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe		PED Case Study	Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district		PED Case Study	Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark		PED Case Study	Compare
Évora, Portugal	POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework	PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Relevant Case Study	Uncompare
Groningen, PED South	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Lab	Compare
Groningen, PED North	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Lab	Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Lab	Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT		PED Lab	Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district	STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Uncompare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Case Study	Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Case Study	Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods	PED Case Study
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods	PED Case Study	Compare
Tartu, City centre area	SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe	PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district	GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab		PED Lab	Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Case Study	Compare
Kifissia, Energy community	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare

Title	Salzburg, Gneis district	Furuset project, Oslo «×»	Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga «×»	Ankara, Çamlık District «×»	NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim «×»	Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium «×»	Romania, Alba Iulia PED «×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab	Salzburg, Gneis district	Furuset project, Oslo	Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga	Ankara, Çamlık District	NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim	Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium	Romania, Alba Iulia PED
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2022/08/Fig.2_Aerial-view_©Gneis-Salzburg-SIR.jpg, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2022/08/Fig.1_Visualisation_©Gneis-Salzburg-SIR.jpg	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/Furuset.-Bildetekst_Planned-measures-and-construction-at-Furuset.-Illustration-by-byplanoslo.no_.jpg, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/Furuset.-Bildetekst_Planned-central-street-in-ZEN-pilot-project-Furuset.-Copyright-City-of-Oslo-Planning-and-Building-Services.-1024x756.jpg	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2022/08/3.jpg, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2022/08/2.jpg, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2022/08/1.jpg	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/07/Camlik_District_Photograph.jpg, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/07/Camlik_District_Map.png, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/07/Camlik_District_Leaflet.docx, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/07/Camlik_District_Graphic_Details.jpg, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/07/Camlik_District_Aerial_View.png	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/NTNU-Campus.-Bildetekst_Illustration-of-the-construction-on-the-west-side-of-the-campus.-Illustration-by-Koht-Architects.png	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2022/10/Kladno_Phases-III.png	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/Picture3.jpg
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case study	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes	no	yes
PED relevant case study	no	no	no	yes	no	yes	no
PED Lab.	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutrality	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes
Annual energy surplus	yes	no	no	yes	no	yes	yes
Energy community	yes	no	yes	yes	no	yes	yes
Circularity	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
Air quality and urban comfort	yes	no	no	no	no	no	yes
Electrification	no	no	no	yes	no	yes	yes
Net-zero energy cost	no	no	no	yes	no	no	no
Net-zero emission	no	yes	no	yes	yes	no	no
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
Maximise self-sufficiency	no	no	no	yes	no	no	yes
Other	no	yes	no	no	yes	no	no
Other (A1P004)		Energy efficient; Sustainable neighbourhood; Social aspects/affordability			Energy neutral; Energy efficient; Sustainable neighbourhood
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED Lab	Completed	In operation	Planning Phase	Planning Phase	In operation	Planning Phase	Implementation Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date	01/20		01/20	10/22	01/16	2022	01/24
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date	01/24		12/22	09/25			12/26
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods,	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities,	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future,	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation,	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities,	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS,	InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts,
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability	Monitoring data available within the districts		Monitoring data available within the districts, Meteorological open data, General statistical datasets, GIS open datasets	Open data city platform – different dashboards, Meteorological open data, General statistical datasets		Open data city platform – different dashboards, General statistical datasets	Monitoring data available within the districts, General statistical datasets, GIS open datasets
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab	https://www.synikia.eu/neighbourhoods/demo-neighbourhood-austria/	https://fmezen.com/furuset-oslo/	Alpagut, B., Lopez Romo, A., Hernández, P., Tabanoğlu, O., & Hermoso Martinez, N. (2021). A GIS-Based Multicriteria Assessment for Identification of Positive Energy Districts Boundary in Cities. Energies, 14(22), 7517.	https://ped-act.com/	https://fmezen.com/knowledge-axis-trondheim/, https://kohtarkitekter.no/projects/ntnu-university-campus, https://www.ntnu.no/campusutvikling	https://mestokladno.cz/energeticky-plusova-mestska-ctvrt/ds-201068	Historical sources, GIS of the municipality, Basic BEMs
A1P011: Geographic coordinates
X Coordinate (longitude):	13.041216	10.896711	29.02631952687517	32.795369	10.396472	14.09296	23.580112098023235
Y Coordinate (latitude):	47.771019	59.941823	40.98841395247461	39.881812	63.422280	50.13715	46.077015278680115
A1P012: Country
A1P012: Country	Austria	Norway	Turkey	Turkey	Norway	Czech Republic	Romania
A1P013: City
A1P013: City	Salzburg	Oslo	Istanbul	Ankara	Trondheim	Kladno	Alba Iulia
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).	Dfb	Cfb	Csb	Dsb	Dfb	Cfb	Dfb
A1P015: District boundary
A1P015: District boundary	Geographic		Geographic	Geographic		Geographic	Functional
Other						V1* (ca 8 buildings)	Geographic
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:	Mixed	Mixed	Mixed	Private	Mixed	Mixed	Public
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:	Single Owner	Multiple Owners	Multiple Owners	Multiple Owners	Multiple Owners	Multiple Owners	Single Owner
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED	17		13	257		8	6
A1P019: Conditioned space
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]	199762		116052	22600
A1P020: Total ground area
A1P020: Total ground area [m²]		870000	1151727	50800	136.000		8423.45
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
A1P022: Financial schemes
A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estate	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO scheme	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural funding	no	no	no	no	no	yes	yes
A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National funding	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional funding	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal funding	no	no	no	no	no	yes	yes
A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EU	yes	no	yes	yes	no	yes	no
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - National	no	no	no	yes	no	yes	no
A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regional	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022: Other
A1P023: Economic Targets
A1P023: Economic Targets	Positive externalities, Other		Job creation, Positive externalities, Other	Boosting local and sustainable production		Job creation, Positive externalities	Job creation, Positive externalities, Other
A1P023: Other	Boosting social cooperation and social aid		Boosting new investors to the area, - Increasing the touristic value of area and urban mobility at the area, - Increasing the regional value (housing price, etc.), - Providing economic advantages by switching to positive energy production				Boosting sustainability for public schools
A1P024: More comments:
A1P024: More comments:				The urban morphology of Çamlık District differs in several ways, compared with the typical urban fabric in Türkiye, along with the capital city of Ankara. The houses on the site are composed of three-story attached single-housing units with multiple rows, creating a total of 257 housing units in total. Low-rise buildings coupled with suitably oriented rooftop surfaces brings about significant advantages in the site. Dense greenery in the site also results in reduced cooling energy demand in the buildings.
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]							3.5
Contact person for general enquiries
A1P026: Name	Abel Magyari	Christoph Gollner	Mr. Dogan UNERI	Prof. Dr. İpek Gürsel DİNO	Christoph Gollner	David Škorňa	Tudor Drâmbărean
A1P027: Organization	ABUD	FFG	Municipality of Kadikoy	Middle East Technical University	FFG	Město Kladno	Municipality of Alba Iulia
A1P028: Affiliation	Research Center / University	Other	Municipality / Public Bodies	Research Center / University	Other	Municipality / Public Bodies	Municipality / Public Bodies
A1P028: Other							Maria Elena Seemann
A1P029: Email	magyari.abel@abud.hu	christoph.gollner@ffg.at	dogan.uneri@kadikoy.bel.tr	ipekg@metu.edu.tr	christoph.gollner@ffg.at	david.skorna@mestokladno.cz	tudor.drambarean@apulum.ro
Contact person for other special topics
A1P030: Name	Strassl Ingeborg		Mrs. Damla MUHCU YILMAZ	Assoc. Prof. Onur Taylan		Michal Kuzmič	Maria-Elena Seemann
A1P031: Email	inge.strassl@salzburg.gv.at		damla.muhcu@kadikoy.bel.tr	otaylan@metu.edu.tr		michal.kuzmic@cvut.cz	maria.seemann@apulum.roapul
Pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
A2P001: Fields of application
A2P001: Fields of application	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production, E-mobility, Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.), Digital technologies	Energy efficiency, Energy production, Construction materials	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production, E-mobility, Digital technologies, Indoor air quality	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production, E-mobility, Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.), Digital technologies, Construction materials
A2P001: Other
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields	- Dynamic district, and building scale energy modelling - Microclimate modelling - Klimaaktiv certification system - Energy community - Flexibility with shared heating and electricity systems			The energy consumption and efficiency of the energy model of Çamlık Site, created using EnergyPlus software, have been evaluated under the scenarios specified below. At each stage, a new system was incorporated to explore the potential of the area becoming a PED. In this context, four scenarios were created to compare different energy scenarios for the Ankara pilot area and to observe the impact of the included systems on energy efficiency: V_base; V_ER; V_ER,HP; V_ER,HP,PV. The basic scenario (V_base) was created using the current state without any improvement to the building envelope. This scenario was developed to determine the annual energy needs of the entire site without any intervention and serves as a reference point for the other developed models. The second scenario (V_ER) was created to improve the building envelopes of all residential units in the area, altering the U-values according to Türkiye's current building standards (TS-825). The third scenario (V_ER,HP) primarily includes a heat pump model that can use electrical energy to produce higher thermal energy and is added on top of the improvements in the second scenario. Finally, the V_ER,HP,PV scenario combines building envelope improvements, the heat pump, and the solar PV system.		Trnsys, PV modelling tools, CAD	Thermal rehabilitation of the main building, and investments in the energy efficiency and consumption fields.
A2P003: Application of ISO52000
A2P003: Application of ISO52000	Yes		Yes	Yes		No	Yes
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance	No		No	Yes		Yes	Yes
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance	No			No		No	No
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation				Mobility is not included in the calculations.		Not yet included.	There will be 1 EV station placed nearby the main building. This would be the link to the mobility field.
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]			0.94	3.446		1.4	0.982
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]			0.10	0.528		0.3	0.048441
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P011: PV	yes	no	yes	yes	no	yes	yes
A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]	0.7770664		0.51	3.4240		1.1
A2P011: Wind	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Hydro	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: PVT_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P012: Geothermal	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Solar Thermal	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]			0.08
A2P012: Biomass_heat	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Waste heat+HP	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]						1.7
A2P012: Biomass_peat_heat	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: PVT_th	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_firewood_th	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes			Two scenarios are conducted regarding Kadikoy PED energy generation. For the second scenario, just 0.53GWh/annum PV production is proposed.			Waste heat from cooling the ice rink.	Only PVs - 940 PVs on the main building
A2P014: Annual energy use
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]	0.819016		0.74	3.976		2.1	0.000048441
A2P015: Annual energy delivered
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]			0.49				0.000113331
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]	-1		0
A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P017: Gas	no	no	no	yes	no	no	no
A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Coal	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Oil	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P018: PV	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]			-0.26
A2P018: Wind	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Hydro	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_peat_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: PVT_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P019: Geothermal	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Solar Thermal	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_heat	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Waste heat+HP	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_peat_heat	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: PVT_th	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_firewood_th	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary	0	0	-2.2692307692308	0	0	0	0
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]						-104
A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
A2P022: Safety & Security							yes
A2P022: Health	CO2) levels, Predicted Mean Vote,Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied, Temperature, Relative Humidity, Illuminance, Daylight factor, Sound pressure levels						yes
A2P022: Education							yes
A2P022: Mobility		Mode of transport; Access to public transport			Mode of transport; Access to public transport		yes
A2P022: Energy	Non-renewable primary energy balance, Renewable energy ratio, Grid Purchase factor, Load cover factor/Self-generation, Supply cover factor/Self-consumption, Net energy/Net power, Peak delivered/exported power, Connection capacity credit, Total greenhouse gas emissions	Energy efficiency in buildings; Net energy need; Gross energy need; Total energy need			Energy efficiency in buildings; Net energy need; Gross energy need; Total energy need	Energy demand (heating and hot water), Energy demand (cooling), Cooling demand, Distributin losses, PV production, RES production, OER, Primafry Non-renewable energy balance, AMR, HMR, CO2 balance	yes
A2P022: Water							yes
A2P022: Economic development	Investment costs, Share of investments covered by grants, Maintenance-related costs, Requirement-related costs, Operation-related costs, Other costs, Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return, Economic Value Added, Payback Period, nZEB Cost Comparison					Investment cost, Caputal cost, Operation cost, payback period, NPV, cummulated cash flow, savings, Life cycle, ROI, SROI	yes
A2P022: Housing and Community	Access to services, Affordability of energy, Affordability of housing, Democratic legitimacy, Living conditions, Social cohesion, Personal safety, Energy consciousness	Delivery and proximity to amenities			Delivery and proximity to amenities
A2P022: Waste
A2P022: Other		GHG emissions; Power/load; Life cycle cost (LCC); Demographic needs and consultation plan; Public Space			GHG emissions; Power/load; Life cycle cost (LCC); Demographic needs and consultation plan; Public Space
A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
A2P023: Photovoltaics	yes	no	yes	yes	no	yes	yes
A2P023: Solar thermal collectors	no	no	yes	no	no	no	yes
A2P023: Wind Turbines	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Geothermal energy system	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Waste heat recovery	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P023: Waste to energy	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Polygeneration	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P023: Co-generation	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P023: Heat Pump	no	no	yes	yes	no	yes	yes
A2P023: Hydrogen	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Hydropower plant	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Biomass	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Biogas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Other
A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)	no	no	no	no	no	yes	yes
A2P024: Energy management system	yes	no	no	no	no	yes	yes
A2P024: Demand-side management	yes	no	no	no	no	yes	yes
A2P024: Smart electricity grid	yes	no	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P024: Thermal Storage	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P024: Electric Storage	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P024: District Heating and Cooling	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systems	no	no	no	no	no	yes	yes
A2P024: P2P – buildings	yes	no	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P024: Other
A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
A2P025: Deep Retrofitting	no	no	no	yes	no	yes	yes
A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildings	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: High-performance new buildings	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P025: Urban data platforms	no	no	no	no	no	yes	yes
A2P025: Mobile applications for citizens	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)	yes	no	no	yes	no	yes	yes
A2P025: Smart irrigation	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposal	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Smart surveillance	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Other
A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)	yes	no	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P026: e-Mobility	yes	no	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutions	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P026: Car-free area	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P026: Other
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes	Shared mobility: a mobility point will be implemented and ensure the flexible use of different mobility services.						The new mobility plan integrates the PED area
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates	Yes		No	No		Yes	Yes
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes	Energy Performance Certificate					National standards apply.
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates	Yes		No	No		No	Yes
A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes	Klimaaktiv certificate, Greenpass certificate
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy		Urban Renewal Strategies	Urban Renewal Strategies, Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.), Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract), National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality	Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract), National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality	Smart cities strategies	Smart cities strategies, Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.), Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC), National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality	Smart cities strategies, Urban Renewal Strategies, Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.), New development strategies, Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC), Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract), National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy						Carbon neutrality 2050	40% reduction in emissions by 2030 according to the Covenant of Mayors
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid	Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps		Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps, Electrification of Cooking Methods	Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps		Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps	Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
A3P003: Other
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities				According to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary with heat pumps. Rooftop photovoltaic panels also have the potential for renewable energy generation. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity through this scenario.			- Thermal rehabilitation - Heat pumps - Smart system capable o various connections and data export - Usage of the energy produced by PVs placed on 3 buildings within the PED
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour							- Education - Replacement of the non-performant PVs - Professional maintenance of the PV system - Reduce of consumptions - Intelligent systems to recover heat - Intelligent system to permit the usage of domestic water from the heating system
A3P006: Economic strategies
A3P006: Economic strategies	Innovative business models, Local trading		Innovative business models, PPP models, Circular economy models, Demand management Living Lab, Local trading			Innovative business models, PPP models, Existing incentives	Open data business models, Innovative business models, Life Cycle Cost, Circular economy models, Demand management Living Lab
A3P006: Other
A3P007: Social models
A3P007: Social models	Strategies towards (local) community-building, Behavioural Change / End-users engagement, Social incentives, Quality of Life, Strategies towards social mix, Affordability, Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance		Strategies towards (local) community-building, Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies, Behavioural Change / End-users engagement, Citizen Social Research, Prevention of energy poverty, Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)	Strategies towards (local) community-building, Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies, Affordability		Strategies towards (local) community-building, Affordability	Strategies towards (local) community-building, Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies, Behavioural Change / End-users engagement, Citizen Social Research, Policy Forums, Social incentives, Quality of Life, Strategies towards social mix, Affordability, Prevention of energy poverty, Digital Inclusion, Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance, Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
A3P007: Other
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies	Building / district Certification		Strategic urban planning, Digital twinning and visual 3D models, District Energy plans, City Vision 2050, SECAP Updates	Digital twinning and visual 3D models, District Energy plans		Strategic urban planning, City Vision 2050, SECAP Updates	Strategic urban planning, District Energy plans, City Vision 2050, SECAP Updates, Building / district Certification
A3P008: Other
A3P009: Environmental strategies
A3P009: Environmental strategies	Energy Neutral, Low Emission Zone	Energy Neutral	Energy Neutral, Low Emission Zone, Net zero carbon footprint	Energy Neutral, Low Emission Zone	Energy Neutral	Net zero carbon footprint	Energy Neutral, Low Emission Zone, Net zero carbon footprint, Carbon-free, Life Cycle approach, Pollutants Reduction, Greening strategies, Sustainable Urban drainage systems (SUDS), Cool Materials, Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
A3P009: Other				Energy Positive, Low Emission Zone
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition				Çamlık District, unlike many other districts in Ankara, has a specific urban morphology that draws near the other pilot zones considered by the partners of PED-ACT. The site has three-storey single housing units, along with a fair amount of greenery around. Furthermore, the roof areas enable large amounts of PV installment, which results in higher amounts of local renewable energy potential. Therefore, the district is a good fit for PED development.		Onsite Energy Ratio > 1	Positive energy district
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development				PED-ACT project.		Strategic, economic	Creation of an area which aims to be sustainable in terms of energy sufficiency and efficiency.
B1P003: Environment of the case study area
B2P003: Environment of the case study area	Suburban area		Urban area	Suburban area	Urban area	Urban area	Urban area
B1P004: Type of district
B2P004: Type of district	New construction	New construction, Renovation	Renovation	Renovation	New construction, Renovation	New construction, Renovation	Renovation
B1P005: Case Study Context
B1P005: Case Study Context	New Development	New Development, Retrofitting Area	Re-use / Transformation Area, Retrofitting Area	Retrofitting Area	Re-use / Transformation Area, New Development, Retrofitting Area	New Development, Retrofitting Area	Retrofitting Area
B1P006: Year of construction
B1P006: Year of construction	2024			1986			1976
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential			23.379
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P011: Population density before intervention
B1P011: Population density before intervention	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
B1P012: Population density after intervention
B1P012: Population density after intervention	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
B1P013: Residential	no	no	yes	yes	no	yes	no
B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]				50800
B1P013: Office	no	no	yes	no	no	yes	no
B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Industry and Utility	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Commercial	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Institutional	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Natural areas	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Recreational	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Dismissed areas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Other	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]			Cultural Center, Sports Center / Total building and land use data of neigborhood 13,878 residential, 4,441 commercial using before intervention. For project area & 49 building area m2
B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
B1P014: Residential	yes	yes	yes	yes	no	yes	no
B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]				50800
B1P014: Office	no	yes	yes	no	no	yes	no
B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Industry and Utility	no	yes	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Commercial	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Institutional	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Natural areas	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Recreational	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Dismissed areas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Other	no	no	yes	no	yes	no	no
B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P003: Scale of action
B2P003: Scale					Campus
B2P004: Operator of the installation
B2P004: Operator of the installation
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?
B2P006: Other
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
B2P007: Other
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
B2P008: Other
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
B2P009: Other
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Other
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P017: Capacities
B2P017: Capacities
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P019: Available tools
B2P019: Available tools
B2P019: Available tools
B2P020: External accessibility
B2P020: External accessibility
C1P001: Unlocking Factors
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	3 - Moderately important
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	2 - Slightly important
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	5 - Very important
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)						Collaboration with the local partners
C1P002: Driving Factors
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important
C1P002: Economic growth need	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	2 - Slightly important
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
C1P003: Administrative barriers
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of public participation	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	2 - Slightly important
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)						Fragmented financial support; lack of experimental budget for complex projects, etc.
C1P004: Policy barriers
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	4 - Important
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)						Different priorities; overall problematic system od decentralization powers; non-fuctioning model of local development funding, etc.
C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Regulatory instability	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important
C1P005: Non-effective regulations	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	2 - Slightly important
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	4 - Important
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P006: Environmental barriers				- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Water Scarcity: 1 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1
C1P007: Technical barriers
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important
C1P007: Deficient planning	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	2 - Slightly important
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)						Inadequate regulation towards energy transition
C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
C1P008: Inertia	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Rebound effect	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	5 - Very important
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
C1P010: Financial barriers
C1P010: Hidden costs	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important
C1P010: Economic crisis	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	2 - Slightly important
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
C1P011: Market barriers
C1P011: Split incentives	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Energy price distortion	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	3 - Moderately important
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	3 - Moderately important
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
C1P012: Stakeholders involved
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities			Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation			Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation	Planning/leading
C1P012: Research & Innovation			Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation			Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: Financial/Funding			Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation
C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data			Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Business process management			None
C1P012: Urban Services providers			Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation			Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: Real Estate developers			None			Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: Design/Construction companies			Construction/implementation
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens			Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation, Monitoring/operation/management			Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs			Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce			Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation, Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Other
C1P012: Other (if any)
Summary

Authors (framework concept)

Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

Contributors (to the content)

Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

Implemented by

Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

Join the Action

COST

PED-EU-NET

Action Details