Search
Close this search box.
Search
Map View
Table View
Projects
Filters:
Clear Filters Export All Entries (CSV)
NameProjectTypeCompare
Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna/16. District HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Estonia V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, the Netherlands (District of Kanaleneiland) V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Portugal V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Uncompare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Uncompare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleSalzburg, Gneis district
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city
«×»
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district
«×»
Bærum, Eiksveien 116
«×»
Ankara, Çamlık District
«×»
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport)
«×»
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad
«×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabSalzburg, Gneis districtRiga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student cityBologna, Pilastro-Roveri districtBærum, Eiksveien 116Ankara, Çamlık DistrictNyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport)Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studyyesyesnonoyesyesno
PED relevant case studynonoyesyesyesnoyes
PED Lab.nonononononono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusyesnononoyesnoyes
Energy communityyesyesyesnoyesnono
Circularitynonononononono
Air quality and urban comfortyesnononononono
Electrificationnononoyesyesnono
Net-zero energy costnononoyesyesnono
Net-zero emissionnononoyesyesyesno
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)noyesnonononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynoyesnonoyesnono
Othernononononoyesyes
Other (A1P004)Energy efficient; Sustainable neighbourhood; Social aspects/affordabilityEnergy-flexibility
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabCompletedPlanning PhasePlanning PhaseCompletedPlanning PhasePlanning PhaseIn operation
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date01/2001/2409/1901/1810/2201/2001/13
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date01/2412/2610/2306/2309/2512/24
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Meteorological open data
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
  • Boeri, A., Boulanger, S., Turci, G., Pagliula, S. (2021) Strategie e tecnologie abilitanti per PED misti: efficienza tra smart cities e industria 4.0. TECHNE, 22, 180-190,
  • Barroco Fontes Cunha F., Carani C., Nucci C.A., Castro C., Santana Silva M., Andrade Torres E. (2021) Transitioning to a low carbon society through energy communities: Lessons learned from Brazil and Italy, ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2021, 75, 1-19.,
  • GRETA Project, Pilastro-Roveri case study. Available at: https://projectgreta.eu/case-study/renewable-energy-district/
A1P011: Geographic coordinates
X Coordinate (longitude):13.04121624.0816833911.39732310.533332.79536914.36316911.078770773531746
Y Coordinate (latitude):47.77101956.9524595644.50710659.910039.88181267.27195461.42604420399112
A1P012: Country
A1P012: CountryAustriaLatviaItalyNorwayTurkeyNorwayNorway
A1P013: City
A1P013: CitySalzburgRigaBolognaBærumAnkaraBodøEvenstad, Stor-Elvdal municipality
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).DfbCfbCfaDfbDsbDfcDwc
A1P015: District boundary
A1P015: District boundaryGeographicGeographicGeographicOtherGeographicGeographic
OtherBuilding
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:MixedPublicMixedPublicPrivatePublicPublic
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Single OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerSingle Owner
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED17151962125722
A1P019: Conditioned space
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]1997621700002260010000
A1P020: Total ground area
A1P020: Total ground area [m²]1192647800000508003400000
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0100000
A1P022: Financial schemes
A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estatenonononononono
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernonononononono
A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononononono
A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnonoyesnononoyes
A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonoyesnononono
A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnonoyesyesnonono
A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononono
A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUyesyesyesnoyesnono
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]7500000
A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonononoyesnoyes
A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonoyesnononono
A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononono
A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022: Other
A1P023: Economic Targets
A1P023: Economic Targets
  • Positive externalities,
  • Other
  • Boosting local businesses,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
  • Job creation,
  • Positive externalities,
  • Boosting local businesses
  • Other
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
  • Boosting local businesses,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
A1P023: OtherBoosting social cooperation and social aidSocial housing
A1P024: More comments:
A1P024: More comments:The Pilastro-Roveri area is a large peri-urban district in the northeast of the city of Bologna (about 650 hectares). In particular, the northern area is mainly characterised by the residential sector of Rione Pilastro, a significant complex of social housing built in the 1960s in response to the housing emergency due to migrations from southern Italy and nowadays satisfying more global migrations. The southern area is instead characterised by the presence of the production district called Roveri. The area appears relevant for the research as it has several evolution potentials towards a climate-neutral district. In particular some key factors are interesting: - the presence of one of the largest photovoltaic parks in Europe on the roofs of CAAB, characterised by a production of 11,350,000 Kw/h of primary energy; - the presence of companies attentive to the issues of climate change and energy, able to act as facilitators for the area. This is the case of FIVE, a leader in the production of electric bicycles, whose plant is the first nZEB (nearly Zero Energy Building) productive building in the city; - the high presence of industrial buildings of different sizes needing a reduction in energy consumption; - the presence of obsolete, sometimes in decay, and of general highly energy-intensive buildings in the Pilastro area, accompanied by spread phenomena of energy poverty; - the presence of spaces that could be converted (e.g. unused warehouses, unexploited green areas, etc.); - the presence of an active community, characterised by numerous associations, but also by social challenges linked to multiple vulnerabilities; - the presence of local actors interested in the development of the area (including the Municipality, the University, Confindustria, ENEA, Confartigianato, etc.). Two main research projects are actually ongoing in the area, applying solutions towards energy improvement and transition strategies to guide the area towards climate neutrality: - GECO - Green Energy Community, funded by EIT Climate-KIC and active since 2019, aims to trigger a virtuous path of energy sharing between companies and citizens through the creation of an energy community. - GRETA - Green Energy Transition Actions, funded by the H2020 programme, aims to understand drivers and barriers on the involvement of citizens in the energy transition processes, by formulating Community Transition Pathways and Energy Citizenship Contracts. [from: Boeri, A., Boulanger, S., Turci, G., Pagliula, S. (2021) Strategie e tecnologie abilitanti per PED misti: efficienza tra smart cities e industria 4.0. TECHNE, 22, 180-190]The urban morphology of Çamlık District differs in several ways, compared with the typical urban fabric in Türkiye, along with the capital city of Ankara. The houses on the site are composed of three-story attached single-housing units with multiple rows, creating a total of 257 housing units in total. Low-rise buildings coupled with suitably oriented rooftop surfaces brings about significant advantages in the site. Dense greenery in the site also results in reduced cooling energy demand in the buildings.
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]
Contact person for general enquiries
A1P026: NameAbel MagyariJudith StiekemaProf. Danila LongoJohn Einar ThommesenProf. Dr. İpek Gürsel DİNOChristoph GollnerÅse Lekang Sørensen
A1P027: OrganizationABUDOASCUniversity of Bologna - Architecture DepartmentSINTEF CommunityMiddle East Technical UniversityFFGSINTEF / The Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods (ZEN) in Smart Cities
A1P028: AffiliationResearch Center / UniversityOtherResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityOtherResearch Center / University
A1P028: Othernot for profit private organisation
A1P029: Emailmagyari.abel@abud.hujudith@oascities.orgjohn.thommesen@sintef.noipekg@metu.edu.trchristoph.gollner@ffg.atase.sorensen@sintef.no
Contact person for other special topics
A1P030: NameStrassl IngeborgJohn Einar ThommesenAssoc. Prof. Onur Taylan
A1P031: Emailinge.strassl@salzburg.gv.atjohn.thommesen@sintef.nootaylan@metu.edu.tr
Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
A2P001: Fields of application
A2P001: Fields of application
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Digital technologies
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Digital technologies,
  • Waste management
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy production,
  • Construction materials
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Digital technologies,
  • Construction materials
A2P001: Other
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields- Dynamic district, and building scale energy modelling - Microclimate modelling - Klimaaktiv certification system - Energy community - Flexibility with shared heating and electricity systemsA suite of replicable modeling tools will enable stakeholders to analyze planning actions towards positive energy in a cost-effective fashion, aiding their evidence based decision-making process. The tools will be able to model the district’s energy production and demand, optimize for flexibility and simulate mobility and transport. By employing gamification and co-creation approaches, the project will enhance public awareness and engagement in energy efficiency. The project will culminate in the publication of practical guidelines, reusable models, algorithms, and training materials to aid other cities to replicate the digital twin for their districts, fostering widespread adoption of sustainable energy practices.Energy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax incentives (110%, façade bonus, eco-bonus, sismabonus, renovation bonus, etc.); - several activities - such as Workshops, Webinars, Roundtables, Urban Trekking, etc…- are encouraged in the area to deepen knowledge and raise awareness on energy issues among urban stakeholders (householders, occupants, workers, etc..); - reduction in energy consumption also through every day energy saving actions. The spread of energy poverty phenomena in the area is considered urgent both for the medium-low-income population living in Pilastro and for small and medium-sized enterprises placed in Roveri; - Project for a One-stop-shop to guide residents and enterprises towards more conscious energy behaviours (planned in Bologna SECAP). Energy production: - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a waste to energy plant connected to the district heating system; - presence of a large PV plant in the CAAB area - 11,350,000 Kw/h Energy flexibility: - testing energy community and collective self-consumption feasibility in Pilastro area through an active citizens involvement process; - testing energy community feasibility among SMEs in Roveri industrial area; - testing the potential of complementary energy consumption profiles between residential area (Pilastro) and industrial area (Roveri). Digital technologies: - smart-meters installation in some dwellings in order to monitor consumption and suggest more sustainable energy behaviors; - Blog Pilastro as a tool to inform about the main activities and events ongoing in the area; E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; - e-bike/bikesharing services recovery (in fact during Covid-19 in the area Mobike service was suspended) and implementation. Urban comfort and air quality - Control units for air pollutants concentration (PM2.5, PM10, NO2); - Microclimatic simulationThe energy consumption and efficiency of the energy model of Çamlık Site, created using EnergyPlus software, have been evaluated under the scenarios specified below. At each stage, a new system was incorporated to explore the potential of the area becoming a PED. In this context, four scenarios were created to compare different energy scenarios for the Ankara pilot area and to observe the impact of the included systems on energy efficiency: V_base; V_ER; V_ER,HP; V_ER,HP,PV. The basic scenario (V_base) was created using the current state without any improvement to the building envelope. This scenario was developed to determine the annual energy needs of the entire site without any intervention and serves as a reference point for the other developed models. The second scenario (V_ER) was created to improve the building envelopes of all residential units in the area, altering the U-values according to Türkiye's current building standards (TS-825). The third scenario (V_ER,HP) primarily includes a heat pump model that can use electrical energy to produce higher thermal energy and is added on top of the improvements in the second scenario. Finally, the V_ER,HP,PV scenario combines building envelope improvements, the heat pump, and the solar PV system.Campus Evenstad is a small department at Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, with 220 students. The vision for Campus Evenstad is an energy-flexible Campus Evenstad in an emission-free Europe. The area consists of approx. 20 buildings managed and owned by Statsbygg; the Norwegian government’s building commissioner, property manager and developer. The oldest building is from the 1700-century and the newest is the administration centre (2017) which is a Zero Emission Building (ZEB) with the highest ambitions (ZEB-COM). Their concept has been to realize Campus Evenstad as an energy pilot, where innovative energy solutions are demonstrated, showing how local areas can become more self-sufficient in energy. The energy system at Evenstad consists of several innovative energy solutions that are new in a Norwegian and European context. They are combined in local infrastructure for electricity and heat, which has led to new knowledge and learning about how the solutions work together, and how the interaction is between the local and the national energy system. The solutions consist of solar cells (PV), solar collectors, combined heat and power plant (CHP) based on wood chips, biofuel boiler, electric boiler, grid connection, district heating, heat storage, stationary battery and bidirectional electric vehicle (EV) charging (V2G). Statsbygg has gained a lot of operational experience from Campus Evenstad - both from individual technologies and from the interaction between these, which benefits Statsbygg's 2,200 buildings and 3 million m2 around Norway. Sharing of experiences is central. Campus Evenstad is a pilot in the Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods (ZEN) in Smart Cities were several of the solutions has been developed and studied.
A2P003: Application of ISO52000
A2P003: Application of ISO52000YesNoYesYesNo
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesNoYesYes
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesNoNoYes
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationThe university operates a fleet of 13 electric vehicles (EV) (61kW power each). There are 5 EV charging stations on campus.Mobility is not included in the calculations.At Campus Evenstad there is infrastructure for EV charging and bidirectional charging (V2G). EV charging is included in the energy balance.
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]80003.4460.77
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]50000.5280.76
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P011: PVyesnoyesnoyesnoyes
A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.77706643.42400.065
A2P011: Windnoyesnonononono
A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Hydrononononononono
A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_elnonononononoyes
A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.050
A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: PVT_elnoyesnonononono
A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Othernonononononono
A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P012: Geothermalyesnononononono
A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Solar Thermalnonoyesnononoyes
A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.045
A2P012: Biomass_heatnoyesyesnononoyes
A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.35
A2P012: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: PVT_thnonononononono
A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Othernonononononono
A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesConventional power generation: The university’s heat supply is designed as a local centralized heat supply system. Electrical power, generated in combined heat and power (CHP) units, is delivered to the distribution network and sold to energy traders as regulated by local legislation and norms. There are two natural gas burners acting as heat sources (3MW and 6MW capacity), and two CHP units (1.6MW and 0.45MW thermal capacity). All heating is supplied from the CHP plants. Renewable Energy Sources (RES): a wind turbine (3.6 kW) and PV panels (11.7 kW) are connected to the faculty microgrid. In the future it is planned to power the campus entirely from local RES.Listed values are measurements from 2018. Renewable energy share is increasing.
A2P014: Annual energy use
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]0.8190163.9761.500
A2P015: Annual energy delivered
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]1
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]-1
A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P017: Gasnoyesnonoyesnono
A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Coalnonononononono
A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Oilnonononononono
A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Othernonononononono
A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P018: PVnonononononono
A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Windnonononononono
A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Hydrononononononono
A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_elnonononononono
A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Othernonononononono
A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_heatnonononononono
A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Othernonononononono
A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary0000000
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]
A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
A2P022: Safety & Security
A2P022: HealthCO2) levels, Predicted Mean Vote,Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied, Temperature, Relative Humidity, Illuminance, Daylight factor, Sound pressure levels
A2P022: Education
A2P022: MobilityMode of transport; Access to public transport
A2P022: EnergyNon-renewable primary energy balance, Renewable energy ratio, Grid Purchase factor, Load cover factor/Self-generation, Supply cover factor/Self-consumption, Net energy/Net power, Peak delivered/exported power, Connection capacity credit, Total greenhouse gas emissionsEnergy efficiency in buildings; Net energy need; Gross energy need; Total energy need
A2P022: Water
A2P022: Economic developmentInvestment costs, Share of investments covered by grants, Maintenance-related costs, Requirement-related costs, Operation-related costs, Other costs, Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return, Economic Value Added, Payback Period, nZEB Cost Comparison
A2P022: Housing and CommunityAccess to services, Affordability of energy, Affordability of housing, Democratic legitimacy, Living conditions, Social cohesion, Personal safety, Energy consciousnessDelivery and proximity to amenities
A2P022: Waste
A2P022: OtherGHG emissions; Power/load; Life cycle cost (LCC); Demographic needs and consultation plan; Public Space
A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesnoyesnoyesnoyes
A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnonoyesnonoyesyes
A2P023: Wind Turbinesnonononononono
A2P023: Geothermal energy systemyesnoyesnonoyesno
A2P023: Waste heat recoverynononononoyesno
A2P023: Waste to energynonoyesnononono
A2P023: Polygenerationnonononononono
A2P023: Co-generationnonoyesnononoyes
A2P023: Heat Pumpnonoyesnoyesyesno
A2P023: Hydrogennonononononono
A2P023: Hydropower plantnonononononono
A2P023: Biomassnonononononoyes
A2P023: Biogasnonononononono
A2P023: OtherThe Co-generation is biomass based.
A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)noyesyesnononoyes
A2P024: Energy management systemyesyesnonononoyes
A2P024: Demand-side managementyesyesnonononoyes
A2P024: Smart electricity gridyesyesnonononono
A2P024: Thermal Storagenoyesnonononoyes
A2P024: Electric Storagenoyesyesnononoyes
A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnoyesyesnonoyesyes
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnoyesnonononoyes
A2P024: P2P – buildingsyesnononononono
A2P024: OtherBidirectional electric vehicle (EV) charging (V2G)
A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnonoyesnoyesnono
A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnonononononono
A2P025: High-performance new buildingsyesnoyesnononoyes
A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)nonoyesnononono
A2P025: Urban data platformsnoyesnonononono
A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnoyesyesnononono
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)yesyesyesnoyesnono
A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononononono
A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonoyesnononono
A2P025: Smart surveillancenonoyesnononono
A2P025: Other
A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nonoyesnononono
A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)yesnoyesnononono
A2P026: e-Mobilityyesnoyesnononoyes
A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnonoyesnononono
A2P026: Car-free areanonononononono
A2P026: Other
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notesShared mobility: a mobility point will be implemented and ensure the flexible use of different mobility services.
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesNoYesNoYes
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance CertificateEnergy Performance Certificate for each dwellingPassive house (2 buildings, 4 200 m2, from 2015)
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesYesNoNoNoYes
A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesKlimaaktiv certificate, Greenpass certificateZero Emission Building (ZEB) with the highest ambitions (ZEB-COM) (admin building, 1 141 m2, 2016)
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
  • Smart cities strategies,
  • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Urban Renewal Strategies,
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyCity level targets Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (PUMS) - 2019 | Targets: - by 2030 440,000 daily trips will no longer be made by car but on foot, by bike or by public transport; - by 2030 12% of vehicles will be electric; Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP) - 2021 | Targets: - by 2025 deep renovation of 3% per year of residential homes (insulation of building envelopes and adoption of heat pump heating system); - by 2030 reduction of electricity consumption at least of 20% compared to 2018; - by 2030 100% coverage of electricity consumption for municipal buildings; - by 2030 increase public green areas by at least 10% Urban General Plan (PUG) - 2021 | Targets: - by 2030 net zero land consumption; National level targets Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan - 2020 | Targets: - by 2030 reduction of 43% for primary energy consumption, with respect to the reference 2007 scenario. - by 2030 increase of 30% of energy production from renewable sources; - by 2025 energy generation for electricity independent from the use of coal;
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
  • Electrification of Cooking Methods
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
A3P003: Other
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesBologna needs to reach the climate neutrality proceeding by ‘part’ of the city. Pilastro-Roveri is a promising district due to the following reasons: - some buildings need to be renovated both to increase the energy performance, the seismic behaviour, spaces liveability and comfort; - Pilastro is a residential area with the presence of a high percentage of vulnerable inhabitants affected by energy poverty phenomenon. This situation needs to be prioritized; - Pilastro is characterized by the presence of large underused green spaces that can represent a valuable resource for social cohesion and for heat island phenomenon mitigation; - Roveri is an industrial area where some small-medium enterprises are investing in order to improve their facilities and to efficiency their production cycle; - Roveri and Pilastro areas present complementary energy consumption curves throughout the day/week with a high potential for energy sharing and flexibility.Nursing home for people with special needsAccording to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary with heat pumps. Rooftop photovoltaic panels also have the potential for renewable energy generation. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity through this scenario.
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
A3P005: Sustainable behaviourBologna SECAP, as well as the participation to the 100 Climate-Neutral Cities, promotes the PED model as an enabling tool to foster city energy transition process. In Pilastro-Roveri district two main sustainable behaviours approaches can be identified: - bottom-up approach - some citizens are joining forces to create groups of energy self-consumption, in view of energy communities’ implementation and, at the same time, some companies have already undertaken some efficiency intervention on the production system by leveraging highly energy-efficient technologies; - top-down approach - GECO and GRETA are international ongoing projects on the area that promote innovation and energy transition with important fundings from the European Union, but with a particular focus on citizen engagement and participatory approach. Simultaneously, new and updated planning tools such as PUG, SECAP and SUMP identify in this part of Bologna city a key area to enable an ecological transition process holding together all relevant stakeholders - citizens, small-medium enterprises and Institutions. These two thrusts (bottom-up and top-down) need to be optimized in view of a participatory pathway towards the grounding of a Positive Energy District in Pilastro-Roveri.
A3P006: Economic strategies
A3P006: Economic strategies
  • Innovative business models,
  • Local trading
  • Open data business models,
  • Innovative business models,
  • Demand management Living Lab
  • Innovative business models,
  • PPP models,
  • Circular economy models,
  • Demand management Living Lab,
  • Existing incentives
A3P006: Other
A3P007: Social models
A3P007: Social models
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
  • Social incentives,
  • Quality of Life,
  • Strategies towards social mix,
  • Affordability,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
  • Citizen Social Research,
  • Policy Forums,
  • Affordability,
  • Prevention of energy poverty,
  • Digital Inclusion,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
  • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
  • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Affordability
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
  • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
  • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour),
  • Other
A3P007: OtherCampus Evenstad is a small department at Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, with 220 students. Sharing knowledge is essential: Evenstad has regular visits from Politicians, decision-makers, researchers, environmental organizations, and energy- and building companies.
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
  • Building / district Certification
  • Digital twinning and visual 3D models
  • Strategic urban planning,
  • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
  • City Vision 2050,
  • SECAP Updates,
  • Building / district Certification
  • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
  • District Energy plans
A3P008: Other
A3P009: Environmental strategies
A3P009: Environmental strategies
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone
  • Energy Neutral
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone,
  • Net zero carbon footprint,
  • Life Cycle approach,
  • Pollutants Reduction,
  • Greening strategies
  • Other
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone
  • Low Emission Zone
A3P009: OtherPEBEnergy Positive, Low Emission Zone
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsPEDs in Italy are meant as strategies towards climate-neutrality: at national/regional/local level a specific legislation on PEDs development is not yet available. However, the European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (‘Renewable energy’ directive - 2018/2001/EU and ‘Common rules for the internal electricity market’ directive- 2019/944/EU). Italy, starting from 2020, has transposed the Directives at national level (‘Milleproroghe’ decree then made effective by ‘Promotion of Renewable sources’ decree 199/2021). At regional level Emilia Romagna in May 2022 developed a law encouraging EC model diffusion (LR 5/2022 ‘Promotion and support of renewable energy communities and renewable energy self-consumers acting collectively’). Energy Community, according to Lindholm et al. 2021, can be considered as ‘a first implementation step towards PEDs.’Campus Evenstad became a prosumer in 2016, as the first with DSO Eidsiva. Evenstad is also one of the first three PV systems in Norway to receive green certificates.
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionExPEDite aims at creating and deploying a novel digital twin, allowing for real-time monitoring, visualization and management of district-level energy flows. Cities consume 65% of the world’s energy supply and are responsible for 70% of the CO² emissions, hence sharing a lot of the responsibility for climate change. We are faced with the challenge of redesigning our existing cities to make them more sustainable, resilient, inclusive and safe. Developing Positive Energy Districts (PEDs), is a breakthrough way to deal with the issue of urban emissions and applying adaptation and mitigation strategies to climate change, while ensuring that these urban areas generate an annual surplus of renewable energy and net zero greenhouse gas emissions. PEDs must address environmental, economic and social issues, providing solutions to energy consumption, production, emissions, transport & mobility and livability. By constantly monitoring and evaluating parameters through existing and/or novel sensor systems (e.g., renewable energy production/supply, transport conditions, air quality, energy demand, meteorological conditions, etc.), unconventional techniques may be applied to provide more sustainable options for the district’s needs.Pilastro-Roveri district can be considered as a PED-relevant area. Even though at the moment the area doesn’t meet annual energy positive balance, it addresses some relevant key aspects listed in the JPI UE PED Framework Definition such as: - high level of aspiration in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production; - integration of different systems and infrastructures; - inclusion of aspects not only related to energy sector, but also connected with social, economic and environmental sustainability.PEBÇamlık District, unlike many other districts in Ankara, has a specific urban morphology that draws near the other pilot zones considered by the partners of PED-ACT. The site has three-storey single housing units, along with a fair amount of greenery around. Furthermore, the roof areas enable large amounts of PV installment, which results in higher amounts of local renewable energy potential. Therefore, the district is a good fit for PED development.The biggest impact is the demonstration of several new energy solutions for local communities. Statsbygg/Campus Evenstad contributes to the development of innovations, pushing technological development through purchasing and demonstration of the solutions. This is a benefit for both end users, energy service providers and society at large. Evenstad also contribute to developing the local business community. For example, local biomass chip production for CHP, development of V2G-software etc. Several key solutions have been important when aiming to achieve the goals of reduced emissions, increased self-sufficiency in energy, and an energy-flexible campus. Example Vehicle-to-grid (V2G): We realized bidirectional EV charging at Campus Evenstad in 2019, demonstrating V2G for the first time in Norway. The experiences from Evenstad provide increased knowledge and practical experience from purchasing, installing and operating the V2G solution, and can contribute to creating new solutions within the energy system. With the equipment installed, the batteries in EVs can supply power back to buildings or the power grid. Example solar cells (PV): We installed PV in 2013 when there were only a few grid-connected PV systems in Norway. The PV system was an important piece in changing the view on solar energy in Norway, where businesses, the public sector and private individuals started seeing the potential for solar energy also this far north. In 2022, the PV system was expanded with PV cells on the facade of the energy center. Example Solar collector system: Covers 100m2 of the roof surface of dormitories and supplies supplies 117 dormitories with all the hot water they need (4000m2 floor area. The solar collector system is connected to the district heating system, where the main heat source is bioenergy. Solar energy and bioenergy complement each other at different times of the year. Example battery bank: Among the 5 largest electrical batteries in Norway connected to the grid. Example CHP: First of its kind in Norway, generating heat and electricity from biomass. Already in 2010, fossil fuels were phased out by converting from oil to wood-chip heating.
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentExpected outcome 1 Increased number of (tangible) city planning actions for positive clean energy districts using the (proto-)PED design, development and management digital twin tools (based on pre-market research learnings) using open-standards based components which can be reused elsewhere. 2 Increased integration of existing smaller scale management systems (e.g. Building management systems) with open-standards based operational city platforms using sectorial data (e.g. building data, mobility, urban planning, etc.). 3 Enhanced data gathering approaches with identification of relevant multidimensional data sets (e.g. meteorological, load profile, social, geo-spatial, etc.) high-resolution real-time data streams (e.g. renewable energy production, energy consumption), and relevant forecasting data, drawing also on the work of common European data spaces. 4 Increased number of city planning departments / approaches using common data and (replicable) elements and processes. 5 Consolidated city sensor network specifications, complemented by appropriate data gathering approaches for soft data. 6 Improved performance of AI based self-learning systems for optimization of positive clean energy districts and bottom-up complex models. 7 Enhanced innovation capacity of local/regional administrations and accelerated uptake of shared, smart and sustainable zero emission solutions.Pilastro-Roveri district is not actually meant to become a PEDs. However, it can be considered as a PED-relevant case-study since a participatory transition pathway towards a more sustainable, efficient and resilient district is gaining ground, involving the main urban stakeholders. At the same time, the most recent city plan and policies (such as the city SECAPs - updated in 2021) are promoting PED model as a key strategy to guide Bologna towards climate neutrality by 2030.PED-ACT project.In line with the EU's vision of "local energy communities", Campus Evenstad demonstrates energy actions that contribute to the clean energy transition. The campus has been developed over several years, demonstrating several innovative and sustainable technologies and energy solutions in a microgrid, e.g. vehicle to grid (V2G), biomass-based combined heat and power (CHP), solar energy, energy storage and zero emission buildings. It shows how to use new technology to enable zero emissions areas. Dedicated professionals, both Statsbygg's operating staff and researchers from FME ZEN have been central to the realization, together with dedicated management at the University campus, who have shown a great willingness to implement new solutions.
B1P003: Environment of the case study area
B2P003: Environment of the case study areaSuburban areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban areaSuburban areaSuburban areaRural
B1P004: Type of district
B2P004: Type of district
  • New construction
  • Renovation
  • New construction
  • Renovation
  • New construction
  • New construction,
  • Renovation
B1P005: Case Study Context
B1P005: Case Study Context
  • New Development
  • Retrofitting Area
  • New Development
  • Retrofitting Area
  • New Development
  • Retrofitting Area
B1P006: Year of construction
B1P006: Year of construction20241986
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P011: Population density before intervention
B1P011: Population density before intervention0000000
B1P012: Population density after intervention
B1P012: Population density after intervention0000000
B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
B1P013: Residentialnonoyesnoyesnono
B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]50800
B1P013: Officenonoyesnononono
B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Industry and Utilitynonoyesnononono
B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Commercialnonoyesnononono
B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Institutionalnonoyesnononono
B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Natural areasyesnoyesnononono
B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Recreationalnonoyesnononono
B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Dismissed areasnonoyesnononono
B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Othernonononononono
B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
B1P014: Residentialyesnoyesnoyesyesno
B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]50800
B1P014: Officenonoyesnononono
B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonoyesnononono
B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Commercialnonoyesnononono
B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Institutionalnonoyesnononono
B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Natural areasyesnoyesnononono
B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Recreationalnonoyesnononono
B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Dismissed areasnonoyesnononono
B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Othernononononoyesno
B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P003: Scale of action
B2P003: Scale
B2P004: Operator of the installation
B2P004: Operator of the installation
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?
B2P006: Other
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
B2P007: Other
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
B2P008: Other
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
B2P009: Other
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Other
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P017: Capacities
B2P017: Capacities
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P019: Available tools
B2P019: Available tools
B2P019: Available tools
B2P020: External accessibility
B2P020: External accessibility
C1P001: Unlocking Factors
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
C1P002: Driving Factors
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Economic growth need1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
C1P003: Administrative barriers
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
C1P004: Policy barriers
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P005: Regulatory instability1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Non-effective regulations1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P006: Environmental barriers- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Water Scarcity: 1 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1
C1P007: Technical barriers
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Deficient planning1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)Energy management systems of different new technologies does not "talk together" (e.g. solar inverter, V2G inverter). This creates challenges.
C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
C1P008: Inertia1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Rebound effect1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)Different interests - Grid/energy stakeholders and building stakeholders
C1P010: Financial barriers
C1P010: Hidden costs1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
C1P011: Market barriers
C1P011: Split incentives1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Energy price distortion1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
C1P012: Stakeholders involved
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
  • Planning/leading
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • Planning/leading
C1P012: Research & Innovation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Financial/Funding
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
  • Planning/leading,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Business process management
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • None
  • Planning/leading
C1P012: Urban Services providers
  • Planning/leading,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: Real Estate developers
  • Construction/implementation
  • None
  • Planning/leading,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Design/Construction companies
  • Construction/implementation
  • Construction/implementation
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • None
C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
  • Construction/implementation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: Other
C1P012: Other (if any)
Summary

Authors (framework concept)

Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

Contributors (to the content)

Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

Implemented by

Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

Join the Action

PED-EU-NET is an open, interdisciplinary and growing network welcoming academics, practitioners and relevant stakeholders to contribute to the activities of the work plan.
Join Now

COST

COST is an EU funding programme that enables researchers to set up their interdisciplinary research networks in Europe and beyond. We provide funds for organising conferences, meetings, training schools, short scientific exchanges or other networking activities in a wide range of scientific topics. By creating open spaces where people and ideas can grow, we unlock the full potential of science.

PED-EU-NET

The COST Action Positive Energy Districts European Network (PED-EU-NET) aims to mobilise researchers and other relevant stakeholders across different domains and sectors to drive the deployment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Europe through open sharing of knowledge, exchange of ideas, pooling of resources, experimentation of new methods and co-creation of novel solutions.

Action Details

Grant Holder
Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome

Start of Action: 10 September 2020
End of Action: 09 September 2024
CSO approval date: 24/03/2020

© 2021-2023 PED-EU-NET COST Action CA19126. All rights reserved.