PED DB: Case Studies – PED-EU-NET

Filters:

Name	Project	Type	Compare
Örebro-Vivalla	JUST PEPP	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger	JUST PEPP	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Texel	JUST PEPP	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Hällefors, Sweden	JUST PEPP	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Pamplona	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus	OPEN4CEC	PED Lab	Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente	COPPER	PED Lab	Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet)	PED StepWise	PED Case Study	Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park	PED StepWise	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten	PED StepWise	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg	HeatCOOP	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH	HeatCOOP	PED Lab	Compare
Tartu, Annelinn	V2G-QUESTS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland	V2G-QUESTS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district	V2G-QUESTS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Lecce, SmartEnCity	SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
STARDUST, Trento	STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities	PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Uncompare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern		PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Firenze, Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0,		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano		PED Relevant Case Study	Uncompare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo		PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna		PED Case Study	Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento		PED Case Study	Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna		PED Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB)	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Võru +CityxChange		PED Case Study	Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Furuset project, Oslo	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights		PED Case Study	Compare
Ydalir project	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport)	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Fornebu, Bærum	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou		PED Case Study	Uncompare
Smart Energy Åland		PED Case Study	Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED	ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts	PED Case Study	Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED	InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts	PED Case Study	Compare
Munich, Harthof district		PED Case Study	Compare
Lublin	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran	CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116	CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Findhorn, the Park	InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts	PED Case Study	Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED	ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Case Study	Compare
Aalborg East		PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Uncompare
Ankara, Çamlık District	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Trenčín	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf	LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis	NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts	PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Uncompare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods	PED Case Study	Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Zaragoza, Actur	NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand	BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts	PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city	ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins	PED Case Study	Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Case Study	Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus	LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Espoo, Kera	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee	PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district	PED Case Study	Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe		PED Case Study	Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district		PED Case Study	Uncompare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark		PED Case Study	Compare
Évora, Portugal	POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework	PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Groningen, PED South	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Lab	Compare
Groningen, PED North	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Lab	Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Lab	Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT		PED Lab	Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district	STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Case Study	Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Case Study	Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods	PED Case Study
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods	PED Case Study	Compare
Tartu, City centre area	SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe	PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district	GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab		PED Lab	Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Case Study	Compare
Kifissia, Energy community	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare

Title	Salzburg, Gneis district	Lund, Brunnshög district «×»	Trento, STARDUST «×»	Fleuraye west, Carquefou «×»	Sharing Cities, Milano «×»	Aalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, Denmark «×»	Vantaa, Aviapolis «×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab	Salzburg, Gneis district	Lund, Brunnshög district	Trento, STARDUST	Fleuraye west, Carquefou	Sharing Cities, Milano	Aalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, Denmark	Vantaa, Aviapolis
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2022/08/Fig.2_Aerial-view_©Gneis-Salzburg-SIR.jpg, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2022/08/Fig.1_Visualisation_©Gneis-Salzburg-SIR.jpg	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2023/03/Brunnshog-vision.png, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2023/03/Brunnshog-visionsbild.jpg, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2023/03/Brunnshog-strukturplan-2023-02.png, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2023/03/Brunnshog-flygbild-2023-02.png	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/ICT_imagefull.png	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/Carquefou-4.jpg, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/Carquefou-3.jpg, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/Carquefou-1.jpg	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/SHARINGCITIES.jpg	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/07/Picture.png	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/07/Aviapolis-PED-Lab-development-area.png
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case study	yes	yes	no	yes	no	no	yes
PED relevant case study	no	no	yes	no	yes	yes	yes
PED Lab.	no	no	yes	no	no	yes	yes
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutrality	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes
Annual energy surplus	yes	yes	no	no	no	no	no
Energy community	yes	yes	no	no	no	no	no
Circularity	no	yes	no	no	no	no	yes
Air quality and urban comfort	yes	yes	no	no	no	no	no
Electrification	no	yes	no	no	no	no	no
Net-zero energy cost	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
Net-zero emission	no	yes	no	yes	no	no	no
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
Maximise self-sufficiency	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
Other	no	yes	yes	yes	yes	no	no
Other (A1P004)		Holistic approach on city planning; Minimise car traffic - walkability; Local service; Climate neutral buildings 2030;	Energy neutral; Energy efficient; Sustainable neighbourhood	Energy neutral; Energy efficient; Social aspects/affordability; Sustainable neighbourhood	Energy efficient; Sustainable neighbourhood; Social aspects/affordability
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED Lab	Completed	In operation	Completed	Completed	Completed	Planning Phase	Planning Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date	01/20	2015	10/17	01/13	01/16	11/22	01/23
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date	01/24	2040	03/24	31/22	12/20	11/25	12/27
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods,		STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities,				NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts,
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability	Monitoring data available within the districts					Monitoring data available within the districts, GIS open datasets	General statistical datasets, GIS open datasets
A1P009: Other		GIS open dataset is under construction
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab	https://www.synikia.eu/neighbourhoods/demo-neighbourhood-austria/	www.lund.se/brunnshog	https://www.comune.trento.it/Aree-tematiche/Smart-city/Progetti-d-innovazione-conclusi/Stardust/Stardust-che-cos-e, https://stardustproject.eu/cities/trento/	www.quartierlafleuriaye.fr, https://www.construction21.org/france/city/fr/quartier-de-la-fleuriaye-a-carquefou.html, http://www.quartierlafleuriaye.fr/actus/le-quartier-la-fleuriaye-2-gagne-son-pari-energetique/	https://sharingcities.eu/city-milan/, https://www.fondazionepolitecnico.it/progetti/sharing-cities/, https://economiaelavoro.comune.milano.it/progetti/smart-cities-lighthouse-sharing-cities	https://greenhubdenmark.dk/en/flexposts/	https://neutralpath.eu/city/vantaa/
A1P011: Geographic coordinates
X Coordinate (longitude):	13.041216	13.232469400769599	11.134148	-1.514197	9.202527	10.007	24.958821
Y Coordinate (latitude):	47.771019	55.71989792207193	46.041160	47.298564	45.452203	57.041028	60.305488
A1P012: Country
A1P012: Country	Austria	Sweden	Italy	France	Italy	Denmark	Finland
A1P013: City
A1P013: City	Salzburg	Lund	Trento	Carquefou	Milano	Aalborg	Vantaa
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).	Dfb	Dfb	Cfb	Cfb	Cfa	Dfb	Dfb
A1P015: District boundary
A1P015: District boundary	Geographic	Geographic				Virtual	Geographic
Other
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:	Mixed	Public	Mixed	Public	Private	Public	Mixed
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:	Single Owner	Multiple Owners	Multiple Owners	Single Owner	Multiple Owners	Multiple Owners	Multiple Owners
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED	17	200
A1P019: Conditioned space
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]	199762	1500000
A1P020: Total ground area
A1P020: Total ground area [m²]		1500000			28.000	31308000	3881000
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area	0	1	0	0	0	0	0
A1P022: Financial schemes
A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estate	no	yes	no	no	no	no	yes
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]		99999999
A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO scheme	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural funding	no	yes	yes	no	yes	no	no
A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]		1000000
A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National funding	no	yes	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]		30000000
A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional funding	no	yes	no	yes	no	no	no
A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]		30000000
A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal funding	no	yes	no	no	yes	no	yes
A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]		180000000
A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EU	yes	yes	no	no	no	no	yes
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]		2000000
A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - National	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regional	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Other	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022: Other			Green financing				Multiple different funding schemes depending on the development site within the District and Lab.
A1P023: Economic Targets
A1P023: Economic Targets	Positive externalities, Other	Other		Boosting local businesses		Positive externalities, Boosting local businesses, Boosting local and sustainable production	Positive externalities, Boosting local businesses, Boosting local and sustainable production
A1P023: Other	Boosting social cooperation and social aid	World class sustainable living and research environments
A1P024: More comments:
A1P024: More comments:
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]
Contact person for general enquiries
A1P026: Name	Abel Magyari	Markus Paulsson	Christoph Gollner	Christoph Gollner	Christoph Gollner	Kristian Olesen	Eira Linko
A1P027: Organization	ABUD	City of Lund	FFG	FFG	FFG	Aalborg University	City of Vantaa
A1P028: Affiliation	Research Center / University	Municipality / Public Bodies	Other	Other	Other	Research Center / University	Municipality / Public Bodies
A1P028: Other
A1P029: Email	magyari.abel@abud.hu	markus.paulsson@lund.se	christoph.gollner@ffg.at	christoph.gollner@ffg.at	christoph.gollner@ffg.at	Kristian@plan.aau.dk	eira.linko@vantaa.fi
Contact person for other special topics
A1P030: Name	Strassl Ingeborg	Eva Dalman				Alex Søgaard Moreno
A1P031: Email	inge.strassl@salzburg.gv.at	eva.dalman@lund.se				asm@aalborg.dk
Pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
A2P001: Fields of application
A2P001: Fields of application	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production, E-mobility, Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.), Digital technologies, Water use, Waste management, Construction materials, Other	Energy efficiency, Energy production, Digital technologies	Energy efficiency, Energy production, Digital technologies, Indoor air quality	Energy efficiency, E-mobility, Digital technologies	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production, Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.), Digital technologies	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production, E-mobility, Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.), Digital technologies, Construction materials, Other
A2P001: Other		Walkability and biking
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields	- Dynamic district, and building scale energy modelling - Microclimate modelling - Klimaaktiv certification system - Energy community - Flexibility with shared heating and electricity systems	LundaMaTs methodology for traffic and city planning. LundaEko - Lund's programme for ecological sustainability. Municipally owned land is sold to property developers on environmental conditions.				Stakeholder engagement, expert energy system analysis, future scenarios	Pilot collaboration with landowners. Carbon footprint assessment and planning guidelines in zoning planning. Green infrastructure requirements. Examples of considered energy solutions: waste heat recovery and utilization, geothermal, air-water heat pumps, district heating return water, photovoltaics, A-class energy efficiency, smart control and monitoring, energy storages, E-mobility above national requirements, cooling
A2P003: Application of ISO52000
A2P003: Application of ISO52000	Yes	No				No	No
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance	No	Yes				No
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance	No	Yes				No
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation		Today electrically charged vehicles are included in the energy balance. In the future also other fuels should be included.				Large combined industrial, residential, and commercial area with complex flows of in- and outgoing traffic.	The calculation of the energy balance will be further developed and specified under the Neutralpath-project. Mobility related emissions are taken into account in the carbon footprint calculation of each zoning plan in the development area.
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]		25				218
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]		30				148
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P011: PV	yes	yes	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]	0.7770664
A2P011: Wind	no	yes	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Hydro	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: PVT_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Other	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P012: Geothermal	yes	no	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Solar Thermal	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_heat	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Waste heat+HP	no	yes	no	no	no	yes	yes
A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]		200				300
A2P012: Biomass_peat_heat	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: PVT_th	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_firewood_th	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes						Very little wind production currently exists in the area. The electricity production of the waste incineration plant will be included at a later date. Aalborg East is partly a remarkable area for hosting a Portland cement factory that accounts for a substantial share of Denmark’s total CO2 emissions. In turn, it also provides waste heat to the district heating grid for all of Aalborg city and some of the smaller towns that are connected to the same DH grid.
A2P014: Annual energy use
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]	0.819016					620
A2P015: Annual energy delivered
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]						399
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]	-1	0
A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P017: Gas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Coal	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Oil	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Other	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]						300
A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P018: PV	no	yes	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Wind	no	yes	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Hydro	no	yes	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_el	no	yes	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_peat_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: PVT_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P019: Geothermal	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Solar Thermal	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_heat	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Waste heat+HP	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_peat_heat	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: PVT_th	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_firewood_th	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]
A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
A2P022: Safety & Security
A2P022: Health	CO2) levels, Predicted Mean Vote,Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied, Temperature, Relative Humidity, Illuminance, Daylight factor, Sound pressure levels
A2P022: Education
A2P022: Mobility		Maximum 1/3 transport with car
A2P022: Energy	Non-renewable primary energy balance, Renewable energy ratio, Grid Purchase factor, Load cover factor/Self-generation, Supply cover factor/Self-consumption, Net energy/Net power, Peak delivered/exported power, Connection capacity credit, Total greenhouse gas emissions	Local energy production 150% of energy need
A2P022: Water
A2P022: Economic development	Investment costs, Share of investments covered by grants, Maintenance-related costs, Requirement-related costs, Operation-related costs, Other costs, Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return, Economic Value Added, Payback Period, nZEB Cost Comparison
A2P022: Housing and Community	Access to services, Affordability of energy, Affordability of housing, Democratic legitimacy, Living conditions, Social cohesion, Personal safety, Energy consciousness	50% rental apartments and 50% owner apartments
A2P022: Waste
A2P022: Other
A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
A2P023: Photovoltaics	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes
A2P023: Solar thermal collectors	no	yes	yes	no	yes	yes	no
A2P023: Wind Turbines	no	yes	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Geothermal energy system	yes	yes	yes	no	yes	no	yes
A2P023: Waste heat recovery	no	yes	yes	no	no	yes	yes
A2P023: Waste to energy	no	no	no	no	no	yes	yes
A2P023: Polygeneration	no	yes	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P023: Co-generation	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Heat Pump	no	yes	yes	no	yes	yes	yes
A2P023: Hydrogen	no	yes	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Hydropower plant	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Biomass	no	no	no	no	no	yes	yes
A2P023: Biogas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Other							The technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case.
A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)	no	yes	yes	no	no	no	yes
A2P024: Energy management system	yes	yes	no	no	yes	yes	yes
A2P024: Demand-side management	yes	yes	no	no	no	yes	yes
A2P024: Smart electricity grid	yes	yes	yes	yes	no	yes	yes
A2P024: Thermal Storage	no	yes	no	no	no	yes	yes
A2P024: Electric Storage	no	yes	no	no	no	yes	yes
A2P024: District Heating and Cooling	no	yes	yes	no	yes	yes	yes
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systems	no	yes	yes	no	no	yes	yes
A2P024: P2P – buildings	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P024: Other							The technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case.
A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
A2P025: Deep Retrofitting	no	no	no	no	yes	yes	no
A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildings	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: High-performance new buildings	yes	yes	no	yes	no	no	yes
A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)	no	yes	yes	no	yes	no	no
A2P025: Urban data platforms	no	yes	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Mobile applications for citizens	no	no	no	no	yes	no	no
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)	yes	yes	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P025: Smart irrigation	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposal	no	yes	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Smart surveillance	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P025: Other							The technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case.
A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)	no	no	yes	no	yes	no	yes
A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)	yes	yes	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P026: e-Mobility	yes	yes	yes	no	yes	no	yes
A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutions	no	yes	no	no	yes	no	yes
A2P026: Car-free area	no	yes	no	no	no	no	no
A2P026: Other
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes	Shared mobility: a mobility point will be implemented and ensure the flexible use of different mobility services.	Walkability
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates	Yes	Yes				Yes	Yes
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes	Energy Performance Certificate	Miljöbyggnad silver/guld
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates	Yes	No		Yes		No
A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes	Klimaaktiv certificate, Greenpass certificate			300 LOGEMENTS PASSIFS CERTIFIÉS PASSIVHAUS
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy		Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)	Smart cities strategies, Urban Renewal Strategies, Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.)	Smart cities strategies, Urban Renewal Strategies	Smart cities strategies, Urban Renewal Strategies	Smart cities strategies, Urban Renewal Strategies, New development strategies, National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality	Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.), New development strategies, Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract), National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy		City strategy: Net climate neutrality 2030				Reduction of 1018000 tons CO2 by 2030	Carbon-Neutral Vantaa by 2030 (min. 80 % reduction of yearly emissions, capture or compensation os the residual 20 %),
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid	Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps					Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps, Biogas
A3P003: Other		No gas grid in Brunnshög
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities		Local waste heat is utlized to a very large extent. More local electricity production is needed. Need to minimise the use of private cars.				Decarbonize part of Aalborg city as a way of working incrementally towards being a zero-emission city.
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour		Need to minimise the use of private cars. Need to provide efficient methods for sorce separated waste collection.				- Stakeholder engagement; - Focus on implementing renewable energy production where possible; - Rretrofitting and energy optimization of existing buildings.
A3P006: Economic strategies
A3P006: Economic strategies	Innovative business models, Local trading	PPP models, Other	Innovative business models	Circular economy models		Life Cycle Cost, Circular economy models	Innovative business models, PPP models, Life Cycle Cost, Circular economy models
A3P006: Other		Attractivenes
A3P007: Social models
A3P007: Social models	Strategies towards (local) community-building, Behavioural Change / End-users engagement, Social incentives, Quality of Life, Strategies towards social mix, Affordability, Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance	Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies, Behavioural Change / End-users engagement, Quality of Life, Strategies towards social mix	Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies	Quality of Life	Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies, Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance	Strategies towards (local) community-building, Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies, Policy Forums, Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance	Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies, Behavioural Change / End-users engagement, Citizen Social Research, Policy Forums, Quality of Life, Strategies towards social mix, Affordability, Prevention of energy poverty, Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance, Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
A3P007: Other
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies	Building / district Certification	Strategic urban planning, Digital twinning and visual 3D models, City Vision 2050, SECAP Updates				Strategic urban planning, District Energy plans	Strategic urban planning, SECAP Updates
A3P008: Other
A3P009: Environmental strategies
A3P009: Environmental strategies	Energy Neutral, Low Emission Zone	Net zero carbon footprint, Greening strategies, Sustainable Urban drainage systems (SUDS), Nature Based Solutions (NBS)	Energy Neutral	Energy Neutral, Net zero carbon footprint, Carbon-free		Energy Neutral, Net zero carbon footprint	Net zero carbon footprint, Life Cycle approach, Greening strategies, Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
A3P009: Other
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects		The municipality cannot demand a specific energy solution to private property owners. It has to be voluntary and market based solutions.				Current energy tariffs disincentivize both individual and collective PV systems – meaning energy communities are not economically feasible, housing associations and public buildings struggle with finding a secure RoI for solar panels, and citizens and local industry lack an incentive to install solar panels on their own
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition		Vision: The city as a power plant. The ultimate goal is that more energy is produced within the distric boundaries than is being used (heating, electricity & mobility). Energy efficient buildings, efficient mobility, reuse of residual heat and solar electricity are the main methods.				The large scale provides interesting opportunities for both urban development and strategic energy planning; the diverse mix of buildings and functions also allow for interesting discussions regarding PEDs. Another interesting facet is that the district heating grid is almost fully supplied by waste heat.	Neutralpath-project is working with the cocept of PCEDs = Positive and Clean Energy Districts (energy-efficient and energy-flexible districts with net zero greenhouse gas emissions and a surplus of renewable energy). Aviapolis Climate-Neutral Lab will work with both PCED and PCED relevant cases within the district.
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development		The aim is to build a sustainable city with minimal climate impact and maximum quality of life. PED is an important step to acheive the aims of a very ambitious city development.				The area has an interesting history of development and has recently undergone several urban improvements. This is coupled with a strong local network of business owners and other stakeholders, all with an interest in developing the area in the best way possible. This made for an interesting case from a planning perspective to investigate how this network would pick up on the concept of PED and whether they could see any potential utility in relation to their everyday experiences.	According to Vantaa city strategy 2021-2025 Aviapolis area aims to become the greenest airport city in Europe. The district is transforming from a logistics and business focused area to a lively urban district which gives an opportunity to rethink the areas energy solutions. With Neutralpath-project Vantaa aims to support the development of the district's energy system and explore innovative, energy efficient and fossil free district energy solutions.
B1P003: Environment of the case study area
B2P003: Environment of the case study area	Suburban area	Urban area	Suburban area		Urban area	Suburban area	Urban area
B1P004: Type of district
B2P004: Type of district	New construction	New construction	Renovation	New construction	Renovation	Renovation	New construction, Renovation
B1P005: Case Study Context
B1P005: Case Study Context	New Development	New Development	Retrofitting Area	New Development	Retrofitting Area	Retrofitting Area	Re-use / Transformation Area, New Development
B1P006: Year of construction
B1P006: Year of construction	2024
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential		0				16.931
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential		18000
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential		2000
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential		22000
B1P011: Population density before intervention
B1P011: Population density before intervention	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
B1P012: Population density after intervention
B1P012: Population density after intervention	0	0.026666666666667	0	0	0	0	0
B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
B1P013: Residential	no	no	yes	no	yes	no	yes
B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Office	no	yes	no	no	no	no	yes
B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]		60000
B1P013: Industry and Utility	no	no	yes	no	no	no	yes
B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Commercial	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Institutional	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Natural areas	yes	yes	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]		2000000
B1P013: Recreational	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Dismissed areas	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Other	no	yes	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]		Outdoor parking: 100000
B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
B1P014: Residential	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes	no	yes
B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]		600000
B1P014: Office	no	yes	no	no	no	no	yes
B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]		650000
B1P014: Industry and Utility	no	no	yes	yes	no	no	yes
B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]				10000
B1P014: Commercial	no	no	no	yes	no	no	yes
B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Institutional	no	yes	no	no	no	no	yes
B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]		50000
B1P014: Natural areas	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Recreational	no	yes	no	yes	no	no	yes
B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]		400000
B1P014: Dismissed areas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition						An ongoing process and dialogue with local stakeholders to determine the future development of the area.	Neutralpath-project is working with the cocept of PCEDs = Positive and Clean Energy Districts (energy-efficient and energy-flexible districts with net zero greenhouse gas emissions and a surplus of renewable energy). Aviapolis Climate-Neutral Lab will work with both PCED and PCED relevant cases within the district.
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P002: Installation life time						No new installation will be made throughout the project. Rather the project will attempt to establish a local PED network with the aim of empowering the stakeholders to better engage with sustainable technologies.
B2P003: Scale of action
B2P003: Scale				District	District	District	District
B2P004: Operator of the installation
B2P004: Operator of the installation						Kristian Olesen	The City of Vantaa manages the lab, working closely with landowners and other stakeholders such as energy companies, solution providers, universities and citizens.
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials						Replication is primarily focused on the establishment of a local network with an interest in and understanding of PED.
B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?						No
B2P006: Other
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab						Civic	Strategic
B2P007: Other
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab						Research center/University	Municipality
B2P008: Other
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab						Academia, Private	Academia, Private, Industrial, Citizens, public, NGO
B2P009: Other
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Other
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P015: Key Performance indicators							Energy, Environmental, Social, Economical / Financial
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P017: Capacities
B2P017: Capacities
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P019: Available tools
B2P019: Available tools							Energy modelling
B2P019: Available tools
B2P020: External accessibility
B2P020: External accessibility							To follow the lab and Vantaa's activities in Neutralpath, fill in the following form: https://neutralpath.eu/fi/tayta-lomake-liittyaksesi-cn-labiin/
C1P001: Unlocking Factors
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	5 - Very important
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	4 - Important
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	4 - Important
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	5 - Very important
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	5 - Very important
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)							Real-estate market situation
C1P002: Driving Factors
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	4 - Important
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	5 - Very important
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	5 - Very important
C1P002: Economic growth need	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	4 - Important
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
C1P003: Administrative barriers
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P003: Lack of public participation	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	2 - Slightly important
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
C1P004: Policy barriers
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	3 - Moderately important
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Regulatory instability	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important
C1P005: Non-effective regulations	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	4 - Important
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	2 - Slightly important
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P006: Environmental barriers		?
C1P007: Technical barriers
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Deficient planning	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
C1P008: Inertia	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	4 - Important
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Rebound effect	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	2 - Slightly important
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	4 - Important
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	2 - Slightly important
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
C1P010: Financial barriers
C1P010: Hidden costs	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important
C1P010: Economic crisis	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	4 - Important
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	2 - Slightly important
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
C1P011: Market barriers
C1P011: Split incentives	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	2 - Slightly important
C1P011: Energy price distortion	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	2 - Slightly important
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)	1 - Unimportant	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	2 - Slightly important
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
C1P012: Stakeholders involved
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities		Planning/leading, Monitoring/operation/management					Planning/leading
C1P012: Research & Innovation		Design/demand aggregation					Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: Financial/Funding		Construction/implementation
C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data		Monitoring/operation/management					Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: Business process management		Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation
C1P012: Urban Services providers		Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation, Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Real Estate developers		Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation, Monitoring/operation/management					Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation, Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Design/Construction companies		Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation					Construction/implementation
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens		Monitoring/operation/management					Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs		None
C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce		Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation, Monitoring/operation/management					Construction/implementation
C1P012: Other
C1P012: Other (if any)
Summary

Authors (framework concept)

Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

Contributors (to the content)

Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

Implemented by

Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

Join the Action

COST

PED-EU-NET

Action Details