Search
Close this search box.
Search
Map View
Table View
Projects
Filters:
Clear Filters Export All Entries (CSV)
NameProjectTypeCompare
Tartu, Estonia V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, the Netherlands (District of Kanaleneiland) V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Portugal V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Uncompare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Uncompare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Uncompare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Uncompare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleTartu, City centre area
Bærum, Eiksveien 116
«×»
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium
«×»
City of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block
«×»
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT
«×»
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark
«×»
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab
«×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabTartu, City centre areaBærum, Eiksveien 116Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter StadiumCity of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva blockLubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMATVienna, Am KempelenparkBarcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynononoyesnoyesno
PED relevant case studyyesyesyesnononono
PED Lab.yesnononoyesnoyes
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesyesnonoyesno
Annual energy surplusnonoyesnonoyesno
Energy communitynonoyesnononoyes
Circularityyesnononononono
Air quality and urban comfortnonononoyesnono
Electrificationyesyesyesnononoyes
Net-zero energy costnoyesnonononono
Net-zero emissionyesyesnonoyesnoyes
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nonononoyesnoyes
Maximise self-sufficiencyyesnonoyesnonono
Othernonononononoyes
Other (A1P004)Green IT
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabImplementation PhaseCompletedPlanning PhaseIn operationImplementation PhasePlanning PhaseIn operation
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date02/1601/18202206/1811/1907/1601/2011
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date07/2206/2303/2212/2302/2502/2013
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards
  • Meteorological open data
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • General statistical datasets
  • General statistical datasets
  • General statistical datasets
  • General statistical datasets
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
  • M. Hukkalainen, F. Zarrin, K. Klobut, O. Lindholm, M. Ranta, P. Hajduk, T. Vainio-Kaila, E. Wanne, J. Tartia, H. Horn, K. Kontu, J. Juhmen, S. Santala, R. Turtiainen, J. Töyräs, T. Koljonen. (2020). Deliverable D3.1 Detailed plan of the Espoo smart city lighthouse demonstrations. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2020-09/SPARCS_D3.1_Detailed_plan_Espoo.pdf,
  • Hukkalainen, Zarrin Fatima, Krzysztof Klobut, Kalevi Piira, Mikaela Ranta, Petr Hajduk, Tiina Vainio-Kaila , Elina Wanne, Jani Tartia, Angela Bartel, Joni Mäkinen, Mia Kaurila, Kaisa Kontu, Jaano Juhmen, Merja Ryöppy, Reetta Turtiainen, Joona Töyräs, Timo Koljonen (2021) Deliverable 3.2 Midterm report on the implemented demonstrations of solutions for energy positive blocks in Espoo. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2022-02/SPARCS_D3.2.pdf,
  • www.lippulaiva.fi
  • http://www.ceder.es/redes-inteligentes,
  • O. Izquierdo-Monge, Paula Peña-Carro et al. Conversion of a network section with loads, storage systems and renewable generation sources into a smart microgrid. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(11), 5012. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115012,
  • O. Izquierdo-Monge, Paula Peña-Carro et al. A Methodology for the Conversion of a Network Section with Generation Sources, Storage and Loads into an Electrical Microgrid Based on Raspberry Pi and Home Assistant. ICSC-Cities 2020, CCIS 1359 proceedings. Springer. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69136-3_1
A1P011: Geographic coordinates
X Coordinate (longitude):26.72273710.533314.0929624.6543-2.50816.3952922.1
Y Coordinate (latitude):58.38071359.910050.1371560.149141.60348.17359841.3
A1P012: Country
A1P012: CountryEstoniaNorwayCzech RepublicFinlandSpainAustriaSpain
A1P013: City
A1P013: CityTartuBærumKladnoEspooLubia - SoriaViennaBarcelona and Tarragona
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).DfbDfbCfbDfbCfbCwbCsa
A1P015: District boundary
A1P015: District boundaryFunctionalOtherGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicVirtual
OtherBuildingV1* (ca 8 buildings)
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:PrivatePublicMixedPrivatePublicPrivatePublic
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerSingle OwnerSingle OwnerSingle Owner
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED18189660
A1P019: Conditioned space
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]35217112000
A1P020: Total ground area
A1P020: Total ground area [m²]7931441650006400000
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0001000
A1P022: Financial schemes
A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estateyesnoyesyesnonono
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]6500000
A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonoyesnononono
A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernonononononono
A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingyesnoyesnononono
A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]4000000
A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingyesnononononono
A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]8000000
A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonononononono
A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnoyesyesnononono
A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononono
A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnonoyesyesnonono
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]308875
A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonoyesnoyesnono
A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonononoyesnono
A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononono
A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022: Other
A1P023: Economic Targets
A1P023: Economic Targets
  • Positive externalities
  • Other
  • Job creation,
  • Positive externalities
  • Job creation,
  • Positive externalities,
  • Boosting local businesses
  • Boosting local and sustainable production,
  • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
  • Job creation,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
A1P023: OtherSocial housing
A1P024: More comments:
A1P024: More comments:The Espoonlahti district is located on the south-western coast of Espoo. With 56,000 inhabitants, it is the second largest of the Espoo city centres. The number of inhabitants is estimated to grow to 70,000 within the next 10 years. Espoonlahti will be a future transit hub of the south-western Espoo, along the metro line, and the increasing stream of passengers provides a huge potential for retail, business and residential developments. E-mobility solutions and last-mile services have strong potential in the area when subway extension is finished and running. The extensive (re)development of the Lippulaiva blocks make a benchmark catering to the everyday needs of residents. The completely new shopping centre is a state-of-the-art cross point with 20,000 daily customers and 10,000 daily commuters (3.5 million/year). The new underground metro line and station, and feeder line bus terminal, are fully integrated. Residential housing of approximately 550 new apartments will be built on top. Lippulaiva is a large traffic hub, directly connected to public transport and right next to the Länsiväylä highway and extensive cycle paths. Lippulaiva offers diverse, mixed-use services, such as a shopping mall, public services, a day care centre, residential apartment buildings, and underground parking facilities. Lippulaiva received the LEED Gold environmental certificate and Smart Building Gold certificate. • Flagship of sustainability • Cooling and heating demand from geothermal energy system (on-site) with energy storage system, 4 MW • PV panels: roof and façade, 630 kWp • Smart control strategies for electricity and thermal energy, smart microgrid-system and battery storage • Charging capacity for 134 EVsThe Centre for the Development of Renewable Energy (CEDER)is specialized in applied research, development and promotion of renewable energy. Among the facilities of this Centre, the urban laboratory CEDER-CIEMAT assess the performance of different configurations of energy networks at the district level. This PED-Lab infrastructure is an energy district that connects six office buildings with energy generation installations by means of two energy rings: electrical grid (in operation phase) and thermal network (in the implementation phase). The buildings of this PED Lab can act as energy demanders or suppliers depending on the climatic and operational conditions. The majority of these buildings are constructed with conventional technologies but some of them are implemented with efficient and sustainable measures. The thermal network is composed by two biomass boilers, 300 kW power each, and water tanks with 90 kWh of thermal storage. This network will shortly be expanded with a low temperature (90°C) and high temperature (150°-250°C) rings. The low-temperature ring is made up by two Stirling engine cogeneration boilers (one biomass gasification boiler and one gas boiler). The high-temperature ring has a thermal generator made up of Fresnel solar concentrators and an ORC cogeneration system fed directly from the solar concentrator. The high-temperature ring is interconnected with the low-temperature ring through an oil/water heat exchanger. This network has thermal storage systems in the modalities of: aquifers, boreholes, phase change materials, cold storage with geothermal exchange ground recovery and thermal storage at very low temperature with zeolites. The electrical grid incorporates different renewable generation technologies (50 kW wind turbine and eight different photovoltaic systems, a reversible hydraulic system), and engine generator of 100 kVA, electricity storages (batteries) and flexible loads.Semi-Virtual Energy Integration Laboratory (SEILAB) The Energy Smart Lab is an infrastructure conceived as a flexible and versatile platform for innovative technological developments for both industry and competitive R+D projects. The areas of expertise of this laboratory pivot around the following technologies: – Power Electronics for the integration and control of the elements within a building or community: Renewable Energy Sources (RES), Energy Storage Systems and Electric Vehicles (EV) – ICT Platform for smart communications and energy management of systems, building, networks and communities. – Energy System Integration technologies for smart and flexible buildings and grids including RES and EV. The laboratory operation is based on the hardware emulation approach, which allows for real physical equipment to be operated under a broad range of scenarios without depending on the real occurrence of the boundary conditions suitable for the experimental validation. The laboratory is pioneer in addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation.
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]25
Contact person for general enquiries
A1P026: NameJaanus TammJohn Einar ThommesenDavid ŠkorňaElina EkelundDr. Raquel RamosGerhard HoferDr. Jaume Salom, Dra. Cristina Corchero
A1P027: OrganizationTartu City GovernmentSINTEF CommunityMěsto KladnoCitycon OyjCentre for the Development of Renewable Energy (CEDER) - Centre for Energy, Environment and Technology Research (CIEMAT)e7 energy innovation & engineeringIREC
A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesSME / IndustryResearch Center / UniversitySME / IndustryResearch Center / University
A1P028: Other
A1P029: EmailJaanus.tamm@tartu.eejohn.thommesen@sintef.nodavid.skorna@mestokladno.czElina.ekelund@citycon.comraquel.ramos@ciemat.esgerhard.hofer@e-sieben.atJsalom@irec.cat
Contact person for other special topics
A1P030: NameKaspar AlevJohn Einar ThommesenMichal KuzmičElina EkelundDr. Oscar Seco
A1P031: EmailKaspar.alev@tartu.eejohn.thommesen@sintef.nomichal.kuzmic@cvut.czElina.ekelund@citycon.comoscar.seco@ciemat.es
Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
A2P001: Fields of application
A2P001: Fields of application
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
  • Digital technologies,
  • Indoor air quality
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Digital technologies,
  • Indoor air quality
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Digital technologies
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • Digital technologies,
  • Indoor air quality
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy production,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
  • Digital technologies,
  • Waste management
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Digital technologies
A2P001: Other
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: - buildings retrofitting - combined public and private financing - low temperature central heating - LED lighting Energy production: - installation of photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Digital technologies: - smart-meters smart home system. Smart city information platform E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; - e-bike/bikesharing services implementation. Urban comfort and air quality - Control units for air pollutants concentration (PM2.5, PM10, NO2) - Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan - SECAP)Trnsys, PV modelling tools, CADEnergy efficiency: - eliminating waste energy utilizing smart energy system - utilizing excess heat from grocery stores Energy flexibility: - A battery energy storage system (1,5 MW/1,5MWh); Active participation in Nordpool electricity market (FCR-N) Energy production: - heating and cooling from geothermal heat pump system; 171 energy wells (over 51 km); heat capacity 4 MW - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Estimation of annual production is about 540 MWh (630 kWp) E-mobility - Installation of charging stations for electric vehicles (for 134 EVs) - e-bike services (warm storage room, charging cabinets for e-bikes) Digital technologies: - Building Analytics system by Schneider ElectricEnergy efficiency: - Buildings energy retrofit. Energy production: - Biomass Boiler capacity: 0.6 MW. Annual production: 1.2 GWh - Solar thermal collectors: 70 kW, planned extended to: 0.47MW - Geotermal & Absorption Pumps: 100 kW - Share of renewables after extension: 100% (30% solar thermal and 70% biomass) - AOC 50kW wind turbine. Awaiting installation of a two-way AC-AC converter for subsequent connection to the grid - Bornay Inclin 3 kW wind turbine, connected to 24 Vdc batteries, to be connected to the grid by means of Xantrex inverter/charger - 9kW photovoltaic park (66PV panels, brand BP Solar,type BP5140,of 140W) connected to the grid by means of two INGECON SUN 5 inverters - 5kW photovoltaic pergola (24PV panels, brand Solon, type P200, of 210W) connected to the grid by means of one INGECON SUN 5 inverter - 8.28kW photovoltaic roof (36PV panels, Brand LDK, type LDK-230P-20), connected to the grid by means of one INGECONSUN 10 inverter - 12kW photovoltaic roof (80PV panels, brand Gamesa, type GS-1501), connected to the grid. - Reversible hydraulic system connected to a 60 kW electric generator and a pumping system. -Stirling engine with a heat lamp based on natural gas, a helium cool lamp, 10kWe maximum power delivered and global performance of approximately 33%. Energy flexibility: - Thermal storage systems: water tanks 90kW, aquifers, boreholes, phase change materials, cold storage with geothermal exchange ground recovery and thermal storage at very low temperature with zeolites. - Electrical storage systems: batteries (lead-acid and lithium-ion). - Flexible loads. Control systems and Digital technologies: - Full monitoring campaign. - Smart-meters installation to monitor consumption and suggest another energy behaviours. - Dynamic simulation tools to optimize the energy performance. Urban comfort and air quality: - Meteorological stations to monitor the climate evolution. - Microclimatic simulation tools to quantify the thermal behaviour.Energy SmartLab capacities - Building simulation model: thermal inertia and thermal loads of a building or community can be co-simulated with a building model. – System Operator and Aggregator simulation models: the interaction with remote control actions carried out by electricity System Operators or flexibility Aggregators can be simulated as well. – Grid simulation model: the physical interaction of the building with the grid power supply can be simulated enabling the experimental validation of flexibility services to the network. Energy SmartLab systems - SAFT Li-ion battery: maximum stored energy 20000 Wh, rated power 150 kW, rated discharge current 200 A, rated charge current 34 A, operating voltage 189 V – 227 V – 254 V, capacity 82 Ah. – Ultracapacitors: maximum stored energy 57 Wh, rated power 10 kW, rated current 20 A, peak current (<1s) 200 Apk, operating voltage 250 V – 500 V, capacity 1,65 F. – Electric vehicle second life battery: maximum stored energy 23300 Wh, rated power 40 kW, rated current 150 A, operating voltage 240 V – 400 V, capacity 32 Ah - 5 microgrid emulators (emulated power 5.5 kVA, max generation connected 10kVA, max consumption connected 10 kVA) - 1 grid emulator (Rated power: 200 kVA, Rated current per phase: 350 A, Rated current per neutral conductor: 35)
A2P003: Application of ISO52000
A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoNoYesNo
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceYesYesYesYesYes
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNoNoNoYes
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationNot yet included.Mobility is not included in the energy model.– Electric vehicle second life battery: maximum stored energy 23300 Wh, rated power 40 kW, rated current 150 A, operating voltage 240 V – 400 V, capacity 32 Ah
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]9.11.45.5
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.35.8
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P011: PVyesnoyesyesyesnoyes
A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]1.10.54
A2P011: Windnonononoyesnono
A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Hydrononononoyesnono
A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_elnonononoyesnono
A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: PVT_elnonononononono
A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Othernonononononono
A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P012: Geothermalnononoyesyesnono
A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]5
A2P012: Solar Thermalyesnononoyesnono
A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.5
A2P012: Biomass_heatnonononoyesnono
A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Waste heat+HPnonoyesnoyesnono
A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]1.7
A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: PVT_thnonononononono
A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononoyesnono
A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Othernonononononono
A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesWaste heat from cooling the ice rink.
A2P014: Annual energy use
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]2.111.3
A2P015: Annual energy delivered
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]5.76
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P017: Gasnonononononoyes
A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
A2P017: Coalnonononononono
A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
A2P017: Oilnonononononono
A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
A2P017: Othernonononononono
A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P018: PVnonononononono
A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Windnonononononono
A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Hydrononononononono
A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_elnonononononono
A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Othernononoyesnonono
A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]5.26
A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_heatnonononononono
A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Othernonononononono
A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary0001.0532319391635000
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]980-1040
A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
A2P022: Safety & Security
A2P022: Health
A2P022: Education
A2P022: Mobility
A2P022: EnergyEnergy demand (heating and hot water), Energy demand (cooling), Cooling demand, Distributin losses, PV production, RES production, OER, Primafry Non-renewable energy balance, AMR, HMR, CO2 balanceOn-site energy ratio
A2P022: Water
A2P022: Economic developmentInvestment cost, Caputal cost, Operation cost, payback period, NPV, cummulated cash flow, savings, Life cycle, ROI, SROI
A2P022: Housing and Community
A2P022: Waste
A2P022: Other
A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesnoyesyesyesnoyes
A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnonononoyesnono
A2P023: Wind Turbinesnonononoyesnono
A2P023: Geothermal energy systemnononoyesyesnono
A2P023: Waste heat recoverynonoyesyesyesnono
A2P023: Waste to energynonononononono
A2P023: Polygenerationnonononoyesnono
A2P023: Co-generationnonononoyesnono
A2P023: Heat Pumpnonoyesnoyesnono
A2P023: Hydrogennonononoyesnono
A2P023: Hydropower plantnonononoyesnono
A2P023: Biomassyesnononoyesnono
A2P023: Biogasyesnononononono
A2P023: Other
A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)yesnoyesyesyesnoyes
A2P024: Energy management systemyesnoyesyesyesnoyes
A2P024: Demand-side managementnonoyesnoyesnono
A2P024: Smart electricity gridnononoyesyesnoyes
A2P024: Thermal Storagenononoyesyesnono
A2P024: Electric Storagenononoyesyesnoyes
A2P024: District Heating and Coolingyesnoyesnoyesnono
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnonoyesnoyesnono
A2P024: P2P – buildingsnonononononono
A2P024: Other
A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
A2P025: Deep Retrofittingyesnoyesnoyesnono
A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnonononononono
A2P025: High-performance new buildingsnononoyesnonono
A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)yesnonoyesnonono
A2P025: Urban data platformsyesnoyesnononono
A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensyesnononononono
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)nonoyesyesyesnoyes
A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononononono
A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonononononono
A2P025: Smart surveillanceyesnononononono
A2P025: Other
A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)yesnononononoyes
A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)yesnonoyesnonono
A2P026: e-Mobilityyesnonoyesnonono
A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnonononononono
A2P026: Car-free areanonononoyesnono
A2P026: OtherLocal transportation hub with direct connection to metro & bus terminal; parking spaces for 1,400 bicycles and for 1,300 cars Promoting e-Mobility: 134 charging stations, A technical reservation for expanding EV charging system 1400 bicycle racks and charging cabinets for 10 e-bicycle batteries
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesYesYesYes
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesNational standards apply.Energy Performance Certificate => Energy efficiency class B (2018 version)In Spain it is mandatory the Energy Performance Certificate in order to buy or rent a house or a dwelling
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoYesNo
A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesLEED (Core & Shell, v4) GOLD certification, Smart Building certification (GOLD)
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.)
  • Smart cities strategies,
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • New development strategies,
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Smart cities strategies,
  • New development strategies,
  • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
  • Smart cities strategies,
  • New development strategies
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyCarbon neutrality 2050Relevant city strategies behind PED development in Espoo include the following: - The Espoo Story: Sustainability is heavily included within the values and goals of the current Espoo city strategy, also known as the Espoo Story, running from 2021 to 2025. For example, the strategy names being a responsible pioneer as one of the main values of the city and has chosen achieving carbon neutrality by 2030 as one of the main goals of the current council term. In addition to the Espoo story, four cross-administrative development programmes act as cooperation platforms that allow the city, together with its partners, to develop innovative solutions through experiments and pilot projects in line with the Espoo Story. The Sustainable Espoo development programme is one of the four programmes, thus putting sustainability on the forefront in city development work. - EU Mission: 100 climate-neutral and smart cities by 2030: Cities selected for the Mission commit to achieving carbon-neutrality in 2030. A key tool in the Mission is the Climate City Contract. Each selected city will prepare and implement its contracts in collaboration with local businesses as well as other stakeholders and residents. - Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy: Espoo is committed to the Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy, under which the signatories commit to supporting the European Union’s 40% greenhouse gas emission reduction goal by 2030. The Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP) is a key instrument for implementing the agreement. The Action Plan outlines the key measures the city will take to achieve its carbon neutrality goal. The plan also includes a mapping of climate change risks and vulnerabilities, adaptation measures, emission calculations, emission reduction scenarios and impact estimations of measures. The SECAP of the City of Espoo is available here (only available in Finnish). - UN Sustainable development Goals: The city of Espoo has committed to becoming a forerunner and achieving the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) by 2025. The goal is to make Espoo financially, ecologically, socially, and culturally sustainable. - The Circular Cities Declaration: At the end of 2020, Espoo signed the Europe-wide circular economy commitment Circular Cities Declaration. The ten goals of the declaration promote the implementation of the city’s circular economy. - Espoo Clean Heat: Fortum and the City of Espoo are committed to producing carbon-neutral district heating in the network operating in the areas of Espoo, Kauniainen and Kirkkonummi during the 2020s. The district heating network provides heating to some 250,000 end-users in homes and offices. Coal will be completely abandoned in the production of district heating by 2025. The main targets related to PED development included in the noted city strategies are the following: - Espoo will achieve carbon neutrality by 2030. To be precise, this carbon neutrality goal is defined as an 80% emission reduction from the 1990 level by the year 2030. The remaining 20% share can be absorbed in carbon sinks or compensated by other means. - District heating in Espoo will be carbon-neutral by 2029, and coal-based production will be phased out from district heating by 2025. - Espoo aims to end the use of fossil fuels in the heating of city-owned buildings by 2025. - Quantitative goals within the Espoo SECAP report: - Espoo aims to reduce total energy consumption within the municipal sector by 7.5% by the end of 2025 in comparison to the 2015 level. The social housing company Espoon Asunnot OY aims to meet the same target. - Espoo aims to cover 10% of the energy consumption of new buildings via on-site production. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of cycling to 15% by 2024. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of public transport by 1.1% yearly. - Espoo aims to reduce the emissions of bus transport by 90% by the end of 2025, when compared to 2010 levels.- Testing the combination of renewable technologies at district level. - Optimization of the generation side based on the weather forecasting and demand side. - Optimization of the control system, connected to the central node, to design and perform virtual analyses based on the combination of all the systems and infrastructures. - Optimization of ICT systems. - Design and management of a virtual analysis - Optimization of efficient measures: building performance, user´s behaviour… - Combination of flexible storage systems to operate the global installation.
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
  • Biogas,
  • Hydrogen
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
  • Biogas,
  • Hydrogen
A3P003: Other
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesNursing home for people with special needs- Citycon (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) aims to be carbon neutral in its energy use by 2030 - Lippulaiva is a unique urban centre with state-of-the-art energy concept. The centre has a smart managing system, which allows for example the temporary reduction of power used in air conditioning and charging stations when energy consumption is at its peak. In addition, a backup generator and a large electric battery will balance the operation of the electricity network. - Lippulaiva is also an important mobility hub for the people of Espoo. Espoonlahti metro station is located under the centre, and the West Metro started to operate to Espoonlahti in December 2022. Lippulaiva also has a bus terminal, which serves the metro’s feeder traffic in the Espoonlahti major district.- Create a thermal energy storage tank to be used for air conditioning the buildings. - Some buildings need to be renovated both to increase the energy performance, the seismic behaviour and spaces liveability and comfort. - Optimizing the coupling between technologies. - Guarantee the flexibility to operate the renewable installations to operate in different phases and with different configurations. - CEDER is a public research center and needs to have connected any energy system to the same grid. - CEDER has an industrial develop area where some experimental thermal storage system could be tested.-Allows for real physical equipment to be operated under a broad range of scenarios without depending on the real occurrence of the boundary conditions suitable for the experimental validation -Pioneer in addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation.
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
A3P005: Sustainable behaviourFor Citycon, it was important to engage local people within the Lippulaiva project. During the construction period as well as after opening of the shopping center, citizens have been engaged in multiple ways, such as informing local citizens of the progress of construction, engaging young people in the design processes of the shopping centre and long-term commitment of youngsters with Lippulaiva Buddy class initiative. Users’ engagement activities are conducted in close co-operation with SPARCS partners.- Minimize the building energy consumption while maintaining indoor comfort levels. - Onsite renewable production with flexible storage elements to fix demand side and generation side. - Flexible control solutions through digitalization systems.-Improving the development of Net Zero Energy Buildings and Flexible Energy buildings.
A3P006: Economic strategies
A3P006: Economic strategies
  • Innovative business models,
  • PPP models,
  • Life Cycle Cost,
  • Existing incentives
  • Innovative business models,
  • PPP models,
  • Existing incentives
  • Innovative business models
  • Demand management Living Lab
  • Demand management Living Lab
A3P006: Other
A3P007: Social models
A3P007: Social models
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
  • Citizen Social Research,
  • Policy Forums,
  • Social incentives,
  • Quality of Life,
  • Prevention of energy poverty,
  • Digital Inclusion,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
  • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
  • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Affordability
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
  • Digital Inclusion,
  • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
  • Digital Inclusion,
  • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
A3P007: Other
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
  • Strategic urban planning,
  • City Vision 2050,
  • SECAP Updates
  • Strategic urban planning,
  • City Vision 2050,
  • SECAP Updates
  • Building / district Certification
  • District Energy plans,
  • Building / district Certification
A3P008: Other
A3P009: Environmental strategies
A3P009: Environmental strategies
  • Net zero carbon footprint,
  • Carbon-free,
  • Pollutants Reduction,
  • Greening strategies,
  • Sustainable Urban drainage systems (SUDS),
  • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
  • Other
  • Net zero carbon footprint
  • Other
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone,
  • Pollutants Reduction,
  • Greening strategies
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone,
  • Pollutants Reduction,
  • Greening strategies
A3P009: OtherPEBCarbon free in terms of energy
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects- Energy efficiency regulations (Directive 2006/32/EC and 2009/72/EC) - EU directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings => all new buildings should be “nearly zero-energy buildings” (nZEB) from 2021- European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (Renewable energy directive - 2018/2001/EU and Common rules for the internal electricity market directive- 2019/944/EU). - Spanish building certification is regulated through Royal Decree 235/2013.- European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (‘Renewable energy’ directive - 2018/2001/EU and ‘Common rules for the internal electricity market’ directive- 2019/944/EU). - Spanish building certification is regulated through Royal Decree 235/2013.
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionPEBOnsite Energy Ratio > 1Lippulaiva is a project with high level goal in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production.
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentStrategic, economic- Citycon’s (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) target is to be carbon neutral by 2030 - Increasing sustainability requirements from the financing, tenants, cities, other stakeholders
B1P003: Environment of the case study area
B2P003: Environment of the case study areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban areaRuralUrban area
B1P004: Type of district
B2P004: Type of district
  • Renovation
  • New construction
  • New construction,
  • Renovation
  • New construction
  • Renovation
B1P005: Case Study Context
B1P005: Case Study Context
  • Retrofitting Area
  • New Development
  • New Development,
  • Retrofitting Area
  • Re-use / Transformation Area,
  • New Development
  • Re-use / Transformation Area,
  • New Development
B1P006: Year of construction
B1P006: Year of construction2022
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential4500
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P011: Population density before intervention
B1P011: Population density before intervention0000000
B1P012: Population density after intervention
B1P012: Population density after intervention0000000
B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
B1P013: Residentialyesnoyesnononono
B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Officenonoyesnonoyesno
B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Commercialyesnonoyesnoyesno
B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Institutionalnonononononono
B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Natural areasyesnonoyesnonono
B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Recreationalyesnoyesnononono
B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Dismissed areasnonononononono
B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Othernonononononono
B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
B1P014: Residentialyesnoyesyesnoyesno
B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Officenonoyesnonoyesno
B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Commercialyesnonoyesnoyesno
B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Institutionalnonononononono
B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Natural areasyesnononononono
B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Recreationalyesnoyesnononono
B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononononono
B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Othernonononononono
B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionaddressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P002: Installation life timeCEDER will follow an integrative approach including technology for a permanent installation.
B2P003: Scale of action
B2P003: ScaleDistrictDistrictVirtual
B2P004: Operator of the installation
B2P004: Operator of the installationCIEMAT. Data detail in contact: mariano.martin@ciemat.es and oscar.izquiedo@ciemat.esIREC
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?NoNoNo
B2P006: Other
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
  • Strategic
  • Strategic
  • Strategic,
  • Private
B2P007: Other
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipalityResearch center/UniversityResearch center/University
B2P008: Other
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
  • Academia,
  • Private,
  • Industrial,
  • Citizens, public, NGO
  • Academia,
  • Industrial
B2P009: Other
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activitiesThe operation of the laboratory with all the components of the energy networks requires a collaborative work between various departments and entities. On the one hand, it is necessary to optimize the operation of renewable systems based on the weather conditions, forecast of the demand side and the flexibility of the generation systems. On the other hand, the optimization of the energy demands through a more sustainable behaviour of both the building and the users want to be acquired. For this, it is necessary to take into account technical aspects but also market, comfort and encourage the user participation, creating a decision-making matrix that allows optimizing the operation of the global system.
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
  • Buildings,
  • Prosumers,
  • Renewable generation,
  • Energy networks,
  • Lighting,
  • E-mobility,
  • Green areas,
  • User interaction/participation,
  • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)
  • Buildings,
  • Demand-side management,
  • Prosumers,
  • Renewable generation,
  • Energy storage,
  • Energy networks,
  • Efficiency measures,
  • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
  • Ambient measures,
  • Social interactions
  • Demand-side management,
  • Energy storage,
  • Energy networks,
  • Efficiency measures,
  • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)
B2P011: Other
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
  • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
  • Pivoting and risk-mitigating measures
  • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
  • Tools for prototyping and modelling
  • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
  • Tools for prototyping and modelling,
  • Tools, spaces, events for testing and validation
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P014: Monitoring measures
  • Available data,
  • Life Cycle Analysis
  • Equipment
  • Equipment
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
  • Energy,
  • Sustainability,
  • Social,
  • Economical / Financial
  • Energy,
  • Environmental,
  • Economical / Financial
  • Energy,
  • Environmental
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P017: Capacities
B2P017: Capacities- Innovative grid configuration to connect bio boilers and solar thermal on buildings. - Environmental & air quality evaluation. - Testing and evaluation of high efficient heating & cooling systems: Gas, biomass, geothermal and absorption H&C pumps … - Definition and implementation of the different regulation modes for the global system. Using the data from the research focused-partners, several regulation modes for the DH network could be defined and implemented in order to obtain an optimal operation of the network. - Innovation in MPC control to enable harvesting 100% renewables in the most efficient way. - Physical integration of the technologies with the existing facilities at the living lab. - Connection between the solar thermal collectors to achieve the lowest heat losses, providing the possibility to use the grid as high or low temperature DH, according to the demand schedule of the buildings. - Test the bio-boiler of the last generation and ultra-low emissions biomass condensing boiler in order to increase efficiency and reduce GHG and air pollutant emissions of the DH plant. - Control of the supply temperature of the DH grid to enable 100% renewables harvesting in the most efficient way. - Research of the incidence of a normal building or a bioclimatic building in the DH grid demand. - Methodologies for concept validation: Definition of the minimum requirements to verify the suitability of the solutions proposed. - Tests campaign: Experimental operation and characterization in a relevant environment, to exploit the technologies at their best and test different demand profiles, different configuration and loads, with real time monitoring and continuous commissioning to control the performance of the technology. - Validation and upgrading recommendation for the DH&C at district level. - Evaluation of innovation actions for potential energy interventions with demand response in buildings. - The complete available infrastructure (MV and LV electric systems, transformation hubs, end consumption, generation sources, communication elements, etc.) belongs to CEDER-CIEMAT, making this the perfect scenario to test and try the performance of “Smart Grid” and “Microgrid” projects. - The type of electric grid, its voltage levels (MV or LV), its variety of real loads (different buildings with different profiles: industrial buildings, offices and so on) and its sources of renewable generation and storage, mean it is ideal for intermediate tests between a small-scale laboratory and final deployment of the real product.- Building simulation model: thermal inertia and thermal loads of a building or community can be co-simulated with a building model. – System Operator and Aggregator simulation models: the interaction with remote control actions carried out by electricity System Operators or flexibility Aggregators can be simulated as well. – Grid simulation model: the physical interaction of the building with the grid power supply can be simulated enabling the experimental validation of flexibility services to the network.
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P018: Relations with stakeholdersCEDER - CIEMAT is a public research body assigned to the Ministry of Science and Innovation under the General Secretariat for Research, focusing on energy and environment. To develop this lab CIEMAT has relations with private renewable companies, research centers and academia institutions.
B2P019: Available tools
B2P019: Available tools
  • Social models
  • Energy modelling
  • Energy modelling
B2P019: Available tools
B2P020: External accessibility
B2P020: External accessibilityCIEMAT is a public body, so it´s open to any institution according the actual regulation and agreements.
C1P001: Unlocking Factors
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)Collaboration with the local partners
C1P002: Driving Factors
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
C1P003: Administrative barriers
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)Fragmented financial support; lack of experimental budget for complex projects, etc.
C1P004: Policy barriers
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)Different priorities; overall problematic system od decentralization powers; non-fuctioning model of local development funding, etc.
C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
C1P005: Non-effective regulations4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P006: Environmental barriers3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Technical barriers
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P007: Deficient planning1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)Inadequate regulation towards energy transition
C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
C1P008: Inertia4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Rebound effect3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
C1P010: Financial barriers
C1P010: Hidden costs5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P010: Economic crisis3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
C1P011: Market barriers
C1P011: Split incentives4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P011: Energy price distortion3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
C1P012: Stakeholders involved
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Research & Innovation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: Financial/Funding
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • None
C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
  • Planning/leading,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Business process management
  • Planning/leading
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Urban Services providers
  • Construction/implementation
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • None
  • Planning/leading
C1P012: Real Estate developers
  • None
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • None
C1P012: Design/Construction companies
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • None
C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Other
C1P012: Other (if any)
Summary

Authors (framework concept)

Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

Contributors (to the content)

Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

Implemented by

Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

Join the Action

PED-EU-NET is an open, interdisciplinary and growing network welcoming academics, practitioners and relevant stakeholders to contribute to the activities of the work plan.
Join Now

COST

COST is an EU funding programme that enables researchers to set up their interdisciplinary research networks in Europe and beyond. We provide funds for organising conferences, meetings, training schools, short scientific exchanges or other networking activities in a wide range of scientific topics. By creating open spaces where people and ideas can grow, we unlock the full potential of science.

PED-EU-NET

The COST Action Positive Energy Districts European Network (PED-EU-NET) aims to mobilise researchers and other relevant stakeholders across different domains and sectors to drive the deployment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Europe through open sharing of knowledge, exchange of ideas, pooling of resources, experimentation of new methods and co-creation of novel solutions.

Action Details

Grant Holder
Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome

Start of Action: 10 September 2020
End of Action: 09 September 2024
CSO approval date: 24/03/2020

© 2021-2023 PED-EU-NET COST Action CA19126. All rights reserved.