Search
Close this search box.
Search
Map View
Table View
Projects
Filters:
Clear Filters Export All Entries (CSV)
NameProjectTypeCompare
Örebro-Vivalla JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Texel JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hällefors, Sweden JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Uncompare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Uncompare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Uncompare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study
TitleKifissia, Energy community
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres
«×»
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT
«×»
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka
«×»
Aarhus, Brabrand
«×»
Freiburg, Waldsee
«×»
Drammen, Jacobs Borchs Gate
«×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabKifissia, Energy communityDistrict Heating Pozo Barredo, MieresLubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMATIzmir, District of KarşıyakaAarhus, BrabrandFreiburg, WaldseeDrammen, Jacobs Borchs Gate
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynononoyesyesyesno
PED relevant case studyyesyesnonoyesnoyes
PED Lab.nonoyesnoyesnono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralitynoyesnoyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusnononoyesyesnono
Energy communityyesnononoyesyesno
Circularitynonononononono
Air quality and urban comfortyesnoyesyesnonono
Electrificationyesnonononoyesno
Net-zero energy costnononoyesnonono
Net-zero emissionnonoyesnoyesyesyes
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nonoyesnononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynononoyesnonono
Othernoyesnonononoyes
Other (A1P004)Energy efficient; Carbon-freeEnergy efficient; Carbon-free; A drive for both non fossil fuel and non-greenhouse gas working fluids plus maximum efficiency led to deploying ammonia fjord source heat pumps
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabPlanning PhaseCompletedImplementation PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhaseCompleted
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date12/1711/1910/2201/2411/2101/09
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date04/1912/2310/2512/2611/2412/12
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • General statistical datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
A1P009: OtherOther
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
    • http://www.ceder.es/redes-inteligentes,
    • O. Izquierdo-Monge, Paula Peña-Carro et al. Conversion of a network section with loads, storage systems and renewable generation sources into a smart microgrid. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(11), 5012. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115012,
    • O. Izquierdo-Monge, Paula Peña-Carro et al. A Methodology for the Conversion of a Network Section with Generation Sources, Storage and Loads into an Electrical Microgrid Based on Raspberry Pi and Home Assistant. ICSC-Cities 2020, CCIS 1359 proceedings. Springer. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69136-3_1
    • Data from the local energy provider available (restricted usage for some data points because of data security reasons,
    • renewable energy potential,
    • own calculations based on publicly available data,
    • Some data can be found in https://geoportal.freiburg.de/freigis/
    A1P011: Geographic coordinates
    X Coordinate (longitude):23.814588-5.774971-2.50827.11004910.2134057.88585713584291710.230603
    Y Coordinate (latitude):38.07734943.24314241.60338.49605456.14962847.98653520708004559.741334
    A1P012: Country
    A1P012: CountryGreeceSpainSpainTurkeyDenmarkGermanyNorway
    A1P013: City
    A1P013: CityMunicipality of KifissiaMieresLubia - SoriaİzmirAarhusFreiburg im BreisgauDrammen
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CsaCsbCfbCsaCfbCfbDfb
    A1P015: District boundary
    A1P015: District boundaryVirtualGeographicGeographicGeographicVirtual
    OtherThe energy will be produced by a PV plant installed on the terrace of a municipal building. Members of the energy community (that is under formation) will benefit from the energy produced via virtual net metering. PV instalment and the buildings (owned by the members of the community) will be within the boundaries of the Municipality but not necessary in the same area/district/neighbourhood
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:PrivatePublicPrivateMixedMixedPrivate
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Single OwnerSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersSingle Owner
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED6212941
    A1P019: Conditioned space
    A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]102795284070
    A1P020: Total ground area
    A1P020: Total ground area [m²]64000003260049200001000
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0003000
    A1P022: Financial schemes
    A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estatenonononononono
    A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
    A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernonononononoyes
    A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononononono
    A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnonononononono
    A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonononononono
    A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnoyesnononoyesno
    A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]25000000
    A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononono
    A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnononoyesyesyesno
    A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]1193355
    A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonoyesyesnoyesno
    A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonoyesnononono
    A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononono
    A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022: Other
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    • Boosting local and sustainable production,
    • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    A1P023: Other
    A1P024: More comments:
    A1P024: More comments:The Centre for the Development of Renewable Energy (CEDER)is specialized in applied research, development and promotion of renewable energy. Among the facilities of this Centre, the urban laboratory CEDER-CIEMAT assess the performance of different configurations of energy networks at the district level. This PED-Lab infrastructure is an energy district that connects six office buildings with energy generation installations by means of two energy rings: electrical grid (in operation phase) and thermal network (in the implementation phase). The buildings of this PED Lab can act as energy demanders or suppliers depending on the climatic and operational conditions. The majority of these buildings are constructed with conventional technologies but some of them are implemented with efficient and sustainable measures. The thermal network is composed by two biomass boilers, 300 kW power each, and water tanks with 90 kWh of thermal storage. This network will shortly be expanded with a low temperature (90°C) and high temperature (150°-250°C) rings. The low-temperature ring is made up by two Stirling engine cogeneration boilers (one biomass gasification boiler and one gas boiler). The high-temperature ring has a thermal generator made up of Fresnel solar concentrators and an ORC cogeneration system fed directly from the solar concentrator. The high-temperature ring is interconnected with the low-temperature ring through an oil/water heat exchanger. This network has thermal storage systems in the modalities of: aquifers, boreholes, phase change materials, cold storage with geothermal exchange ground recovery and thermal storage at very low temperature with zeolites. The electrical grid incorporates different renewable generation technologies (50 kW wind turbine and eight different photovoltaic systems, a reversible hydraulic system), and engine generator of 100 kVA, electricity storages (batteries) and flexible loads.
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]
    Contact person for general enquiries
    A1P026: NameArtemis Giavasoglou, Kleopatra KalampokaChristoph GollnerDr. Raquel RamosOzlem SenyolJohanne Bräuner Nygaard HansenDr. Annette SteingrubeChristoph Gollner
    A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of Kifissia – SPARCS local teamFFGCentre for the Development of Renewable Energy (CEDER) - Centre for Energy, Environment and Technology Research (CIEMAT)Karsiyaka MunicipalityITK, the city of AarhusFraunhofer Institute for solar energy systemsFFG
    A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesOtherResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityOther
    A1P028: Other
    A1P029: Emailgiavasoglou@kifissia.grchristoph.gollner@ffg.atraquel.ramos@ciemat.esozlemkocaer2@gmail.comhjobr@aarhus.dkAnnette.Steingrube@ise.fraunhofer.dechristoph.gollner@ffg.at
    Contact person for other special topics
    A1P030: NameStavros Zapantis - vice mayorDr. Oscar SecoHasan Burak Cavka
    A1P031: Emailstavros.zapantis@gmail.comoscar.seco@ciemat.eshasancavka@iyte.edu.tr
    Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYes
    A2P001: Fields of application
    A2P001: Fields of application
    • Energy production
    • Energy efficiency
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • Digital technologies,
    • Indoor air quality
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.)
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Digital technologies
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Waste management
    • Energy efficiency
    A2P001: Other
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: - Buildings energy retrofit. Energy production: - Biomass Boiler capacity: 0.6 MW. Annual production: 1.2 GWh - Solar thermal collectors: 70 kW, planned extended to: 0.47MW - Geotermal & Absorption Pumps: 100 kW - Share of renewables after extension: 100% (30% solar thermal and 70% biomass) - AOC 50kW wind turbine. Awaiting installation of a two-way AC-AC converter for subsequent connection to the grid - Bornay Inclin 3 kW wind turbine, connected to 24 Vdc batteries, to be connected to the grid by means of Xantrex inverter/charger - 9kW photovoltaic park (66PV panels, brand BP Solar,type BP5140,of 140W) connected to the grid by means of two INGECON SUN 5 inverters - 5kW photovoltaic pergola (24PV panels, brand Solon, type P200, of 210W) connected to the grid by means of one INGECON SUN 5 inverter - 8.28kW photovoltaic roof (36PV panels, Brand LDK, type LDK-230P-20), connected to the grid by means of one INGECONSUN 10 inverter - 12kW photovoltaic roof (80PV panels, brand Gamesa, type GS-1501), connected to the grid. - Reversible hydraulic system connected to a 60 kW electric generator and a pumping system. -Stirling engine with a heat lamp based on natural gas, a helium cool lamp, 10kWe maximum power delivered and global performance of approximately 33%. Energy flexibility: - Thermal storage systems: water tanks 90kW, aquifers, boreholes, phase change materials, cold storage with geothermal exchange ground recovery and thermal storage at very low temperature with zeolites. - Electrical storage systems: batteries (lead-acid and lithium-ion). - Flexible loads. Control systems and Digital technologies: - Full monitoring campaign. - Smart-meters installation to monitor consumption and suggest another energy behaviours. - Dynamic simulation tools to optimize the energy performance. Urban comfort and air quality: - Meteorological stations to monitor the climate evolution. - Microclimatic simulation tools to quantify the thermal behaviour.Methods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4). In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED.Energy system modeling
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoYesYes
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceYesYesNoYes
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoYesYes
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationMobility is not included in the calculations.Not determined yetAll energy demands are included in energy balance, either fuel demands or electrical demand of transport sector; Projection is made of future share of electric mobilty, rest is covered with synthetic fuels to achieve climate neutrality
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]3.862135.715
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]1.22631.76
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P011: PVyesnoyesyesnonono
    A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]1.028
    A2P011: Windnonoyesnononono
    A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Hydrononoyesnononono
    A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Biomass_elnonoyesnononono
    A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: PVT_elnonononononono
    A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Othernonononononono
    A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P012: Geothermalnonoyesnononono
    A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Solar Thermalnonoyesnononono
    A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Biomass_heatnonoyesnononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Waste heat+HPnonoyesnononono
    A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: PVT_thnonononononono
    A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonoyesnononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Othernonononononono
    A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes53 MW PV potential in all three quarters; no other internal renewable energy potentials known
    A2P014: Annual energy use
    A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]5.088132.5
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P017: Gasnononoyesnonono
    A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Coalnonononononono
    A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Oilnonononononono
    A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Othernonononononono
    A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P018: PVnononoyesnonono
    A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.707
    A2P018: Windnonononononono
    A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Hydrononononononono
    A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_elnonononononono
    A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
    A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
    A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Othernonononononono
    A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
    A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
    A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_heatnonononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
    A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
    A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Othernonononononono
    A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary0001.4540311173975000
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]
    A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
    A2P022: Safety & Security
    A2P022: Health
    A2P022: Education
    A2P022: Mobilityyes
    A2P022: Energyyes
    A2P022: Water
    A2P022: Economic development
    A2P022: Housing and Communityyes
    A2P022: Waste
    A2P022: Other
    A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
    A2P023: Photovoltaicsnonoyesyesnoyesno
    A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnonoyesnonoyesno
    A2P023: Wind Turbinesnonoyesnononono
    A2P023: Geothermal energy systemnoyesyesnonoyesno
    A2P023: Waste heat recoverynonoyesnonoyesno
    A2P023: Waste to energynononononoyesno
    A2P023: Polygenerationnonoyesnononono
    A2P023: Co-generationnonoyesnonoyesno
    A2P023: Heat Pumpnonoyesyesnoyesyes
    A2P023: Hydrogennonoyesnonoyesno
    A2P023: Hydropower plantnonoyesnonoyesno
    A2P023: Biomassnonoyesnonoyesno
    A2P023: Biogasnononononoyesno
    A2P023: Other
    A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
    A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)nonoyesnonoyesno
    A2P024: Energy management systemnonoyesnonoyesno
    A2P024: Demand-side managementnonoyesnonoyesno
    A2P024: Smart electricity gridnonoyesnonoyesno
    A2P024: Thermal Storagenonoyesnonoyesno
    A2P024: Electric Storagenonoyesnonoyesno
    A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnoyesyesnonoyesyes
    A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnonoyesnonoyesno
    A2P024: P2P – buildingsnononononoyesno
    A2P024: Other
    A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
    A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnonoyesyesnoyesno
    A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnononononoyesno
    A2P025: High-performance new buildingsnonononononono
    A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)nonononononono
    A2P025: Urban data platformsnononononoyesno
    A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnonononononono
    A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)nonoyesyesnonono
    A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononononono
    A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonononononono
    A2P025: Smart surveillancenonononononono
    A2P025: Other
    A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
    A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nononononoyesno
    A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)nononononoyesno
    A2P026: e-Mobilitynononononoyesno
    A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnononononoyesno
    A2P026: Car-free areanonoyesnononono
    A2P026: Other
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesNoNo
    A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance Certificate - in Greece it is mandatory in order to buy or rent a house or a dwellingIn Spain it is mandatory the Energy Performance Certificate in order to buy or rent a house or a dwelling
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoNo
    A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC)
    • Urban Renewal Strategies
    • Smart cities strategies,
    • New development strategies,
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Smart cities strategies
    • Smart cities strategies
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy- Testing the combination of renewable technologies at district level. - Optimization of the generation side based on the weather forecasting and demand side. - Optimization of the control system, connected to the central node, to design and perform virtual analyses based on the combination of all the systems and infrastructures. - Optimization of ICT systems. - Design and management of a virtual analysis - Optimization of efficient measures: building performance, user´s behaviour… - Combination of flexible storage systems to operate the global installation.Karşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030. System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023.Climate neutrality by 2035
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
    • Biogas,
    • Hydrogen
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
    • Biogas,
    • Hydrogen
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
    A3P003: Other
    A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
    A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities- Create a thermal energy storage tank to be used for air conditioning the buildings. - Some buildings need to be renovated both to increase the energy performance, the seismic behaviour and spaces liveability and comfort. - Optimizing the coupling between technologies. - Guarantee the flexibility to operate the renewable installations to operate in different phases and with different configurations. - CEDER is a public research center and needs to have connected any energy system to the same grid. - CEDER has an industrial develop area where some experimental thermal storage system could be tested.According to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario.Freiburg has ambitious goals and wants to achieve climate neutrality until 2035, the PED concept could help to develop suitable strategies on district level
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviour- Minimize the building energy consumption while maintaining indoor comfort levels. - Onsite renewable production with flexible storage elements to fix demand side and generation side. - Flexible control solutions through digitalization systems.Energy efficiency by renovation measures for buildings and measures for saving electricity; electrification by installation of heat pumps and photovoltaics and switching to electric cars, additional measures not directly related to PED like sustainable diet and sharing economy
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    • Innovative business models
    • Demand management Living Lab
    • Demand management Living Lab,
    • Local trading,
    • Existing incentives
    A3P006: Other
    A3P007: Social models
    A3P007: Social models
    • Digital Inclusion,
    • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Affordability
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
    • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
    A3P007: Other
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    • District Energy plans,
    • Building / district Certification
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
    • District Energy plans,
    • SECAP Updates
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
    • District Energy plans
    A3P008: Other
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    • Carbon-free
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Low Emission Zone,
    • Pollutants Reduction,
    • Greening strategies
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Low Emission Zone,
    • Pollutants Reduction
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Carbon-free
    A3P009: Other
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects- European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (Renewable energy directive - 2018/2001/EU and Common rules for the internal electricity market directive- 2019/944/EU). - Spanish building certification is regulated through Royal Decree 235/2013.
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionThe pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED).Assessment methods for this ped (and for germany) is defined in this project at the moment and will be tested at that case study
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentCity is interested in transforming the quarter, as many buildings are old, have private owner structures and have decentralised heating systems. As the city wants to become climate neutral by 2035 action is needed now. In the research project PED urban the idea is to focus on the future energy system of the quarter and use it as a case study to develop a common assessment method for PEDs in alignment with european efforts in that regard
    B1P003: Environment of the case study area
    B2P003: Environment of the case study areaSuburban areaRuralUrban areaSuburban areaSuburban area
    B1P004: Type of district
    B2P004: Type of district
    • Renovation
    • Renovation
    • Renovation
    • Renovation
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Retrofitting Area
    B1P006: Year of construction
    B1P006: Year of construction2005
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential5898
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential5898
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
    B1P011: Population density before intervention
    B1P011: Population density before intervention0000000
    B1P012: Population density after intervention
    B1P012: Population density after intervention000000.00119878048780490
    B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
    B1P013: Residentialnononoyesnoyesno
    B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]102795
    B1P013: Officenononononoyesno
    B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Industry and Utilitynononononoyesno
    B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Commercialnononononoyesno
    B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Institutionalnoyesnononoyesno
    B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Natural areasnononononoyesno
    B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Recreationalnononononoyesno
    B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Dismissed areasnonononononono
    B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Othernoyesnonononono
    B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
    B1P014: Residentialnononoyesnoyesno
    B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]102795
    B1P014: Officenononononoyesno
    B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Industry and Utilitynononononoyesno
    B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Commercialnononononoyesno
    B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Institutionalnoyesnononoyesno
    B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Natural areasnononononoyesno
    B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Recreationalnononononoyesno
    B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononononono
    B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Othernoyesnonononono
    B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
    B2P002: Installation life time
    B2P002: Installation life timeCEDER will follow an integrative approach including technology for a permanent installation.
    B2P003: Scale of action
    B2P003: ScaleDistrictDistrictDistrictDistrict
    B2P004: Operator of the installation
    B2P004: Operator of the installationCIEMAT. Data detail in contact: mariano.martin@ciemat.es and oscar.izquiedo@ciemat.es
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
    B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
    B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?No
    B2P006: Other
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    • Strategic
    • Strategic
    B2P007: Other
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabResearch center/UniversityResearch center/University
    B2P008: Other
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    • Academia,
    • Industrial
    • Academia,
    • Private,
    • Citizens, public, NGO
    B2P009: Other
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activitiesThe operation of the laboratory with all the components of the energy networks requires a collaborative work between various departments and entities. On the one hand, it is necessary to optimize the operation of renewable systems based on the weather conditions, forecast of the demand side and the flexibility of the generation systems. On the other hand, the optimization of the energy demands through a more sustainable behaviour of both the building and the users want to be acquired. For this, it is necessary to take into account technical aspects but also market, comfort and encourage the user participation, creating a decision-making matrix that allows optimizing the operation of the global system.
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    • Buildings,
    • Demand-side management,
    • Prosumers,
    • Renewable generation,
    • Energy storage,
    • Energy networks,
    • Efficiency measures,
    • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
    • Ambient measures,
    • Social interactions
    B2P011: Other
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
    • Tools for prototyping and modelling
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    • Equipment
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    • Energy,
    • Environmental,
    • Economical / Financial
    • Energy,
    • Environmental,
    • Sustainability,
    • Social,
    • Economical / Financial
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P017: Capacities
    B2P017: Capacities- Innovative grid configuration to connect bio boilers and solar thermal on buildings. - Environmental & air quality evaluation. - Testing and evaluation of high efficient heating & cooling systems: Gas, biomass, geothermal and absorption H&C pumps … - Definition and implementation of the different regulation modes for the global system. Using the data from the research focused-partners, several regulation modes for the DH network could be defined and implemented in order to obtain an optimal operation of the network. - Innovation in MPC control to enable harvesting 100% renewables in the most efficient way. - Physical integration of the technologies with the existing facilities at the living lab. - Connection between the solar thermal collectors to achieve the lowest heat losses, providing the possibility to use the grid as high or low temperature DH, according to the demand schedule of the buildings. - Test the bio-boiler of the last generation and ultra-low emissions biomass condensing boiler in order to increase efficiency and reduce GHG and air pollutant emissions of the DH plant. - Control of the supply temperature of the DH grid to enable 100% renewables harvesting in the most efficient way. - Research of the incidence of a normal building or a bioclimatic building in the DH grid demand. - Methodologies for concept validation: Definition of the minimum requirements to verify the suitability of the solutions proposed. - Tests campaign: Experimental operation and characterization in a relevant environment, to exploit the technologies at their best and test different demand profiles, different configuration and loads, with real time monitoring and continuous commissioning to control the performance of the technology. - Validation and upgrading recommendation for the DH&C at district level. - Evaluation of innovation actions for potential energy interventions with demand response in buildings. - The complete available infrastructure (MV and LV electric systems, transformation hubs, end consumption, generation sources, communication elements, etc.) belongs to CEDER-CIEMAT, making this the perfect scenario to test and try the performance of “Smart Grid” and “Microgrid” projects. - The type of electric grid, its voltage levels (MV or LV), its variety of real loads (different buildings with different profiles: industrial buildings, offices and so on) and its sources of renewable generation and storage, mean it is ideal for intermediate tests between a small-scale laboratory and final deployment of the real product.
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholdersCEDER - CIEMAT is a public research body assigned to the Ministry of Science and Innovation under the General Secretariat for Research, focusing on energy and environment. To develop this lab CIEMAT has relations with private renewable companies, research centers and academia institutions.
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P019: Available tools
    • Energy modelling
    • Energy modelling,
    • Decision making models
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P020: External accessibility
    B2P020: External accessibilityCIEMAT is a public body, so it´s open to any institution according the actual regulation and agreements.
    C1P001: Unlocking Factors
    C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
    C1P002: Driving Factors
    C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
    C1P003: Administrative barriers
    C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Lack of public participation3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
    C1P004: Policy barriers
    C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
    C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
    C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Non-effective regulations4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
    C1P006: Environmental barriers
    C1P006: Environmental barriers3 - Moderately important- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 - Water Scarcity: 1
    C1P007: Technical barriers
    C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Deficient planning3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Lack of well-defined process4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
    C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
    C1P008: Inertia4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Rebound effect4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
    C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
    C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
    C1P010: Financial barriers
    C1P010: Hidden costs1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Risk and uncertainty1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
    C1P011: Market barriers
    C1P011: Split incentives1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Energy price distortion1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
    C1P012: Stakeholders involved
    C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading
    C1P012: Research & Innovation
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Financial/Funding
    • None
    • None
    C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    C1P012: Business process management
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    C1P012: Urban Services providers
    • Planning/leading
    • None
    C1P012: Real Estate developers
    • None
    • None
    C1P012: Design/Construction companies
    • Construction/implementation
    • Construction/implementation
    C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
    • None
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    C1P012: Other
    C1P012: Other (if any)
    Summary

    Authors (framework concept)

    Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

    Contributors (to the content)

    Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

    Implemented by

    Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
    Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

    Join the Action

    PED-EU-NET is an open, interdisciplinary and growing network welcoming academics, practitioners and relevant stakeholders to contribute to the activities of the work plan.
    Join Now

    COST

    COST is an EU funding programme that enables researchers to set up their interdisciplinary research networks in Europe and beyond. We provide funds for organising conferences, meetings, training schools, short scientific exchanges or other networking activities in a wide range of scientific topics. By creating open spaces where people and ideas can grow, we unlock the full potential of science.

    PED-EU-NET

    The COST Action Positive Energy Districts European Network (PED-EU-NET) aims to mobilise researchers and other relevant stakeholders across different domains and sectors to drive the deployment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Europe through open sharing of knowledge, exchange of ideas, pooling of resources, experimentation of new methods and co-creation of novel solutions.

    Action Details

    Grant Holder
    Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome

    Start of Action: 10 September 2020
    End of Action: 09 September 2024
    CSO approval date: 24/03/2020

    © 2021-2023 PED-EU-NET COST Action CA19126. All rights reserved.