Search
Close this search box.
Search
Map View
Table View
Projects
Filters:
Clear Filters Export All Entries (CSV)
NameProjectTypeCompare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Uncompare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study
TitleKifissia, Energy community
Ankara, Çamlık District
«×»
City of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block
«×»
Évora, Portugal
«×»
Aalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, Denmark
«×»
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park
«×»
Sinfonia, Bolzano
«×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabKifissia, Energy communityAnkara, Çamlık DistrictCity of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva blockÉvora, PortugalAalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, DenmarkUtrecht, Utrecht Science ParkSinfonia, Bolzano
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynoyesyesnononono
PED relevant case studyyesyesnoyesyesyesyes
PED Lab.nononoyesyesnono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralitynoyesnonoyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusnoyesnoyesnonono
Energy communityyesyesnoyesnoyesno
Circularitynonononononono
Air quality and urban comfortyesnononononoyes
Electrificationyesyesnononoyesno
Net-zero energy costnoyesnononoyesno
Net-zero emissionnoyesnonononono
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nonononononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynoyesyesnoyesnono
Othernononononoyesyes
Other (A1P004)minimise grid-congestion problemsEnergy efficient; Sustainable neighbourhood; Social aspects/affordability
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabPlanning PhasePlanning PhaseIn operationImplementation PhasePlanning PhaseImplementation PhaseCompleted
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date10/2206/1810/1911/2202/2401/14
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date09/2503/2209/2411/2512/3012/20
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets
  • General statistical datasets
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • GIS open datasets
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
    • M. Hukkalainen, F. Zarrin, K. Klobut, O. Lindholm, M. Ranta, P. Hajduk, T. Vainio-Kaila, E. Wanne, J. Tartia, H. Horn, K. Kontu, J. Juhmen, S. Santala, R. Turtiainen, J. Töyräs, T. Koljonen. (2020). Deliverable D3.1 Detailed plan of the Espoo smart city lighthouse demonstrations. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2020-09/SPARCS_D3.1_Detailed_plan_Espoo.pdf,
    • Hukkalainen, Zarrin Fatima, Krzysztof Klobut, Kalevi Piira, Mikaela Ranta, Petr Hajduk, Tiina Vainio-Kaila , Elina Wanne, Jani Tartia, Angela Bartel, Joni Mäkinen, Mia Kaurila, Kaisa Kontu, Jaano Juhmen, Merja Ryöppy, Reetta Turtiainen, Joona Töyräs, Timo Koljonen (2021) Deliverable 3.2 Midterm report on the implemented demonstrations of solutions for energy positive blocks in Espoo. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2022-02/SPARCS_D3.2.pdf,
    • www.lippulaiva.fi
      A1P011: Geographic coordinates
      X Coordinate (longitude):23.81458832.79536924.6543-7.90937710.00752.0845691511.343447
      Y Coordinate (latitude):38.07734939.88181260.149138.57080457.0410285.1763231794933746.482310
      A1P012: Country
      A1P012: CountryGreeceTurkeyFinlandPortugalDenmarkNetherlandsItaly
      A1P013: City
      A1P013: CityMunicipality of KifissiaAnkaraEspooÉvoraAalborgUtrechtBolzano
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CsaDsbDfbCsaDfbCfbCfa
      A1P015: District boundary
      A1P015: District boundaryVirtualGeographicGeographicGeographicVirtualGeographic
      OtherThe energy will be produced by a PV plant installed on the terrace of a municipal building. Members of the energy community (that is under formation) will benefit from the energy produced via virtual net metering. PV instalment and the buildings (owned by the members of the community) will be within the boundaries of the Municipality but not necessary in the same area/district/neighbourhood
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:PrivatePrivateMixedPublicMixedPrivate
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple Owners
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED2579
      A1P019: Conditioned space
      A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]22600112000
      A1P020: Total ground area
      A1P020: Total ground area [m²]50800165000313080003000000
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0010000
      A1P022: Financial schemes
      A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estatenonoyesnononono
      A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
      A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernonononononono
      A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononononono
      A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnononononoyesno
      A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonononononono
      A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnonononononono
      A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononoyes
      A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnoyesyesyesnonono
      A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]30887519998275
      A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnoyesnonoyesnono
      A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonononononono
      A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononoyes
      A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022: OtherGreen financing
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      • Job creation,
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local businesses
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local businesses,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      A1P023: Other
      A1P024: More comments:
      A1P024: More comments:The urban morphology of Çamlık District differs in several ways, compared with the typical urban fabric in Türkiye, along with the capital city of Ankara. The houses on the site are composed of three-story attached single-housing units with multiple rows, creating a total of 257 housing units in total. Low-rise buildings coupled with suitably oriented rooftop surfaces brings about significant advantages in the site. Dense greenery in the site also results in reduced cooling energy demand in the buildings.The Espoonlahti district is located on the south-western coast of Espoo. With 56,000 inhabitants, it is the second largest of the Espoo city centres. The number of inhabitants is estimated to grow to 70,000 within the next 10 years. Espoonlahti will be a future transit hub of the south-western Espoo, along the metro line, and the increasing stream of passengers provides a huge potential for retail, business and residential developments. E-mobility solutions and last-mile services have strong potential in the area when subway extension is finished and running. The extensive (re)development of the Lippulaiva blocks make a benchmark catering to the everyday needs of residents. The completely new shopping centre is a state-of-the-art cross point with 20,000 daily customers and 10,000 daily commuters (3.5 million/year). The new underground metro line and station, and feeder line bus terminal, are fully integrated. Residential housing of approximately 550 new apartments will be built on top. Lippulaiva is a large traffic hub, directly connected to public transport and right next to the Länsiväylä highway and extensive cycle paths. Lippulaiva offers diverse, mixed-use services, such as a shopping mall, public services, a day care centre, residential apartment buildings, and underground parking facilities. Lippulaiva received the LEED Gold environmental certificate and Smart Building Gold certificate. • Flagship of sustainability • Cooling and heating demand from geothermal energy system (on-site) with energy storage system, 4 MW • PV panels: roof and façade, 630 kWp • Smart control strategies for electricity and thermal energy, smart microgrid-system and battery storage • Charging capacity for 134 EVs
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]
      Contact person for general enquiries
      A1P026: NameArtemis Giavasoglou, Kleopatra KalampokaProf. Dr. İpek Gürsel DİNOElina EkelundJoão Bravo DiasKristian OlesenSara Herreras MartinezChristoph Gollner
      A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of Kifissia – SPARCS local teamMiddle East Technical UniversityCitycon OyjEDP LabelecAalborg UniversityUniversity of Applied Science UtrechtFFG
      A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversitySME / IndustrySME / IndustryResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityOther
      A1P028: Other
      A1P029: Emailgiavasoglou@kifissia.gripekg@metu.edu.trElina.ekelund@citycon.comjoao.bravodias@edp.ptKristian@plan.aau.dkSara.herrerasmartinez@hu.nlchristoph.gollner@ffg.at
      Contact person for other special topics
      A1P030: NameStavros Zapantis - vice mayorAssoc. Prof. Onur TaylanElina EkelundAlex Søgaard Moreno
      A1P031: Emailstavros.zapantis@gmail.comotaylan@metu.edu.trElina.ekelund@citycon.comasm@aalborg.dk
      Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYes
      A2P001: Fields of application
      A2P001: Fields of application
      • Energy production
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy production,
      • Construction materials
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies,
      • Waste management,
      • Construction materials
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
      • Digital technologies
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies,
      • Indoor air quality,
      • Construction materials
      A2P001: Other
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsThe energy consumption and efficiency of the energy model of Çamlık Site, created using EnergyPlus software, have been evaluated under the scenarios specified below. At each stage, a new system was incorporated to explore the potential of the area becoming a PED. In this context, four scenarios were created to compare different energy scenarios for the Ankara pilot area and to observe the impact of the included systems on energy efficiency: V_base; V_ER; V_ER,HP; V_ER,HP,PV. The basic scenario (V_base) was created using the current state without any improvement to the building envelope. This scenario was developed to determine the annual energy needs of the entire site without any intervention and serves as a reference point for the other developed models. The second scenario (V_ER) was created to improve the building envelopes of all residential units in the area, altering the U-values according to Türkiye's current building standards (TS-825). The third scenario (V_ER,HP) primarily includes a heat pump model that can use electrical energy to produce higher thermal energy and is added on top of the improvements in the second scenario. Finally, the V_ER,HP,PV scenario combines building envelope improvements, the heat pump, and the solar PV system.Energy efficiency: - eliminating waste energy utilizing smart energy system - utilizing excess heat from grocery stores Energy flexibility: - A battery energy storage system (1,5 MW/1,5MWh); Active participation in Nordpool electricity market (FCR-N) Energy production: - heating and cooling from geothermal heat pump system; 171 energy wells (over 51 km); heat capacity 4 MW - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Estimation of annual production is about 540 MWh (630 kWp) E-mobility - Installation of charging stations for electric vehicles (for 134 EVs) - e-bike services (warm storage room, charging cabinets for e-bikes) Digital technologies: - Building Analytics system by Schneider ElectricStakeholder engagement, expert energy system analysis, future scenarios
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000YesYesNoNo
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceYesYesYesNo
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoYesNo
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationMobility is not included in the calculations.Mobility is not included in the energy model.Large combined industrial, residential, and commercial area with complex flows of in- and outgoing traffic.
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]3.4465.5218
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.5285.8148
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]2.35
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P011: PVyesyesyesnononono
      A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]3.42400.54
      A2P011: Windnonononoyesnono
      A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Hydrononononononono
      A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_elnonononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: PVT_elnonononononono
      A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Othernonononoyesnono
      A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P012: Geothermalnonoyesnononono
      A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]5
      A2P012: Solar Thermalnonononononono
      A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_heatnonononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Waste heat+HPnonononoyesnono
      A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]300
      A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: PVT_thnonononononono
      A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Othernonononononono
      A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesVery little wind production currently exists in the area. The electricity production of the waste incineration plant will be included at a later date. Aalborg East is partly a remarkable area for hosting a Portland cement factory that accounts for a substantial share of Denmark’s total CO2 emissions. In turn, it also provides waste heat to the district heating grid for all of Aalborg city and some of the smaller towns that are connected to the same DH grid.
      A2P014: Annual energy use
      A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]3.97611.3620
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]5.76399
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
      A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P017: Gasnoyesnonononono
      A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
      A2P017: Coalnonononononono
      A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
      A2P017: Oilnonononononono
      A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
      A2P017: Othernonononoyesnono
      A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]300
      A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P018: PVnonononononono
      A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Windnonononononono
      A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Hydrononononononono
      A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_elnonononononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
      A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Othernonoyesnononono
      A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]5.26
      A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
      A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
      A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_heatnonononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
      A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
      A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Othernonononononono
      A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary001.05323193916350000
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]0
      A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
      A2P022: Safety & Security
      A2P022: Health
      A2P022: Education
      A2P022: Mobility
      A2P022: EnergyOn-site energy ratio
      A2P022: Water
      A2P022: Economic development
      A2P022: Housing and Community
      A2P022: Waste
      A2P022: Other
      A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
      A2P023: Photovoltaicsnoyesyesyesyesyesyes
      A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnononoyesyesnoyes
      A2P023: Wind Turbinesnonononononono
      A2P023: Geothermal energy systemnonoyesnonoyesno
      A2P023: Waste heat recoverynonoyesnoyesnono
      A2P023: Waste to energynonononoyesnono
      A2P023: Polygenerationnonononononono
      A2P023: Co-generationnonononononono
      A2P023: Heat Pumpnoyesnonoyesyesyes
      A2P023: Hydrogennonononononono
      A2P023: Hydropower plantnonononononono
      A2P023: Biomassnonononoyesnono
      A2P023: Biogasnonononononono
      A2P023: Other
      A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
      A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)nonoyesyesnonoyes
      A2P024: Energy management systemnonoyesyesyesyesno
      A2P024: Demand-side managementnonononoyesnono
      A2P024: Smart electricity gridnonoyesyesyesnoyes
      A2P024: Thermal Storagenonoyesyesyesyesno
      A2P024: Electric Storagenonoyesyesyesnono
      A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnonononoyesyesyes
      A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnononoyesyesnono
      A2P024: P2P – buildingsnononoyesnonono
      A2P024: Other
      A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
      A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnoyesnonoyesyesno
      A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnononoyesnonono
      A2P025: High-performance new buildingsnonoyesnononono
      A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)nonoyesnononoyes
      A2P025: Urban data platformsnononoyesnonono
      A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnononoyesnonono
      A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)noyesyesyesnonono
      A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononononono
      A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnononoyesnonono
      A2P025: Smart surveillancenononoyesyesnono
      A2P025: Other
      A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
      A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nonononononono
      A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)nonoyesnononono
      A2P026: e-Mobilitynonoyesyesnonoyes
      A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnononoyesnonono
      A2P026: Car-free areanonononononono
      A2P026: OtherLocal transportation hub with direct connection to metro & bus terminal; parking spaces for 1,400 bicycles and for 1,300 cars Promoting e-Mobility: 134 charging stations, A technical reservation for expanding EV charging system 1400 bicycle racks and charging cabinets for 10 e-bicycle batteries
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesNoYesNoYes
      A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance Certificate - in Greece it is mandatory in order to buy or rent a house or a dwellingEnergy Performance Certificate => Energy efficiency class B (2018 version)
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoYesNoNo
      A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesLEED (Core & Shell, v4) GOLD certification, Smart Building certification (GOLD)
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC)
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • New development strategies,
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Smart cities strategies,
      • Urban Renewal Strategies,
      • New development strategies,
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.)
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyRelevant city strategies behind PED development in Espoo include the following: - The Espoo Story: Sustainability is heavily included within the values and goals of the current Espoo city strategy, also known as the Espoo Story, running from 2021 to 2025. For example, the strategy names being a responsible pioneer as one of the main values of the city and has chosen achieving carbon neutrality by 2030 as one of the main goals of the current council term. In addition to the Espoo story, four cross-administrative development programmes act as cooperation platforms that allow the city, together with its partners, to develop innovative solutions through experiments and pilot projects in line with the Espoo Story. The Sustainable Espoo development programme is one of the four programmes, thus putting sustainability on the forefront in city development work. - EU Mission: 100 climate-neutral and smart cities by 2030: Cities selected for the Mission commit to achieving carbon-neutrality in 2030. A key tool in the Mission is the Climate City Contract. Each selected city will prepare and implement its contracts in collaboration with local businesses as well as other stakeholders and residents. - Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy: Espoo is committed to the Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy, under which the signatories commit to supporting the European Union’s 40% greenhouse gas emission reduction goal by 2030. The Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP) is a key instrument for implementing the agreement. The Action Plan outlines the key measures the city will take to achieve its carbon neutrality goal. The plan also includes a mapping of climate change risks and vulnerabilities, adaptation measures, emission calculations, emission reduction scenarios and impact estimations of measures. The SECAP of the City of Espoo is available here (only available in Finnish). - UN Sustainable development Goals: The city of Espoo has committed to becoming a forerunner and achieving the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) by 2025. The goal is to make Espoo financially, ecologically, socially, and culturally sustainable. - The Circular Cities Declaration: At the end of 2020, Espoo signed the Europe-wide circular economy commitment Circular Cities Declaration. The ten goals of the declaration promote the implementation of the city’s circular economy. - Espoo Clean Heat: Fortum and the City of Espoo are committed to producing carbon-neutral district heating in the network operating in the areas of Espoo, Kauniainen and Kirkkonummi during the 2020s. The district heating network provides heating to some 250,000 end-users in homes and offices. Coal will be completely abandoned in the production of district heating by 2025. The main targets related to PED development included in the noted city strategies are the following: - Espoo will achieve carbon neutrality by 2030. To be precise, this carbon neutrality goal is defined as an 80% emission reduction from the 1990 level by the year 2030. The remaining 20% share can be absorbed in carbon sinks or compensated by other means. - District heating in Espoo will be carbon-neutral by 2029, and coal-based production will be phased out from district heating by 2025. - Espoo aims to end the use of fossil fuels in the heating of city-owned buildings by 2025. - Quantitative goals within the Espoo SECAP report: - Espoo aims to reduce total energy consumption within the municipal sector by 7.5% by the end of 2025 in comparison to the 2015 level. The social housing company Espoon Asunnot OY aims to meet the same target. - Espoo aims to cover 10% of the energy consumption of new buildings via on-site production. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of cycling to 15% by 2024. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of public transport by 1.1% yearly. - Espoo aims to reduce the emissions of bus transport by 90% by the end of 2025, when compared to 2010 levels.Reduction of 1018000 tons CO2 by 2030
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
      • Biogas
      A3P003: Other
      A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
      A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesAccording to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary with heat pumps. Rooftop photovoltaic panels also have the potential for renewable energy generation. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity through this scenario.- Citycon (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) aims to be carbon neutral in its energy use by 2030 - Lippulaiva is a unique urban centre with state-of-the-art energy concept. The centre has a smart managing system, which allows for example the temporary reduction of power used in air conditioning and charging stations when energy consumption is at its peak. In addition, a backup generator and a large electric battery will balance the operation of the electricity network. - Lippulaiva is also an important mobility hub for the people of Espoo. Espoonlahti metro station is located under the centre, and the West Metro started to operate to Espoonlahti in December 2022. Lippulaiva also has a bus terminal, which serves the metro’s feeder traffic in the Espoonlahti major district.Decarbonize part of Aalborg city as a way of working incrementally towards being a zero-emission city.
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviourFor Citycon, it was important to engage local people within the Lippulaiva project. During the construction period as well as after opening of the shopping center, citizens have been engaged in multiple ways, such as informing local citizens of the progress of construction, engaging young people in the design processes of the shopping centre and long-term commitment of youngsters with Lippulaiva Buddy class initiative. Users’ engagement activities are conducted in close co-operation with SPARCS partners.- Stakeholder engagement; - Focus on implementing renewable energy production where possible; - Rretrofitting and energy optimization of existing buildings.
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      • Innovative business models
      • Life Cycle Cost,
      • Circular economy models
      A3P006: Other
      A3P007: Social models
      A3P007: Social models
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Affordability
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Policy Forums,
      • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
      • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
      A3P007: Other
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
      • District Energy plans
      • Building / district Certification
      • Strategic urban planning,
      • District Energy plans
      • District Energy plans
      • SECAP Updates
      A3P008: Other
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone
      • Other
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Net zero carbon footprint
      • Energy Neutral
      • Energy Neutral
      A3P009: OtherEnergy Positive, Low Emission ZoneCarbon free in terms of energy
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects- Energy efficiency regulations (Directive 2006/32/EC and 2009/72/EC) - EU directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings => all new buildings should be “nearly zero-energy buildings” (nZEB) from 2021Current energy tariffs disincentivize both individual and collective PV systems – meaning energy communities are not economically feasible, housing associations and public buildings struggle with finding a secure RoI for solar panels, and citizens and local industry lack an incentive to install solar panels on their own
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionÇamlık District, unlike many other districts in Ankara, has a specific urban morphology that draws near the other pilot zones considered by the partners of PED-ACT. The site has three-storey single housing units, along with a fair amount of greenery around. Furthermore, the roof areas enable large amounts of PV installment, which results in higher amounts of local renewable energy potential. Therefore, the district is a good fit for PED development.Lippulaiva is a project with high level goal in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production.The PED main objective is to achieve the energy transition while preserving cultural heritage and improving citizen’s quality of life.The large scale provides interesting opportunities for both urban development and strategic energy planning; the diverse mix of buildings and functions also allow for interesting discussions regarding PEDs. Another interesting facet is that the district heating grid is almost fully supplied by waste heat.
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentPED-ACT project.- Citycon’s (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) target is to be carbon neutral by 2030 - Increasing sustainability requirements from the financing, tenants, cities, other stakeholdersPOCITYF brings together eight cities (Lightouse and Fellow cities), all having cultural heritage areas in their territory. All are intrinsically motivated to participate in the necessary energy transition not only for their conventional city districts of mixed-used, but also for districts with individually specificities as those belonging in their cultural heritage, which at the moment may be acting as barriers for their further environmental sustainability, but after POCITYF will be acting as a promising building retrofits roadmap for similar and other EU cities.The area has an interesting history of development and has recently undergone several urban improvements. This is coupled with a strong local network of business owners and other stakeholders, all with an interest in developing the area in the best way possible. This made for an interesting case from a planning perspective to investigate how this network would pick up on the concept of PED and whether they could see any potential utility in relation to their everyday experiences.
      B1P003: Environment of the case study area
      B2P003: Environment of the case study areaSuburban areaUrban areaUrban areaSuburban areaSuburban area
      B1P004: Type of district
      B2P004: Type of district
      • Renovation
      • New construction
      • Renovation
      • Renovation
      • Renovation
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      • Retrofitting Area
      • Re-use / Transformation Area,
      • New Development
      • Preservation Area
      • Retrofitting Area
      • Retrofitting Area
      B1P006: Year of construction
      B1P006: Year of construction19862022
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential16.931
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
      B1P011: Population density before intervention
      B1P011: Population density before intervention0000000
      B1P012: Population density after intervention
      B1P012: Population density after intervention0000000
      B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
      B1P013: Residentialnoyesnonononoyes
      B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]50800
      B1P013: Officenonononononono
      B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
      B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Commercialnonoyesnononono
      B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Institutionalnonononononono
      B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Natural areasnonoyesnononono
      B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Recreationalnonononononono
      B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Dismissed areasnonononononono
      B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Othernonononononono
      B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
      B1P014: Residentialnoyesyesnononoyes
      B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]50800
      B1P014: Officenonononononono
      B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
      B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Commercialnonoyesnononono
      B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Institutionalnonononononono
      B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Natural areasnonononononono
      B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Recreationalnonononononono
      B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononononono
      B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Othernonononononono
      B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionAn ongoing process and dialogue with local stakeholders to determine the future development of the area.
      B2P002: Installation life time
      B2P002: Installation life timeNo new installation will be made throughout the project. Rather the project will attempt to establish a local PED network with the aim of empowering the stakeholders to better engage with sustainable technologies.
      B2P003: Scale of action
      B2P003: ScaleDistrictDistrictDistrict
      B2P004: Operator of the installation
      B2P004: Operator of the installationKristian Olesen
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materialsReplication is primarily focused on the establishment of a local network with an interest in and understanding of PED.
      B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
      B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?No
      B2P006: Other
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      • Civic
      B2P007: Other
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabResearch center/University
      B2P008: Other
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      • Academia,
      • Private
      B2P009: Other
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      • Buildings,
      • Demand-side management,
      • Prosumers,
      • Renewable generation,
      • Energy storage,
      • Energy networks,
      • Waste management,
      • E-mobility,
      • Social interactions,
      • Circular economy models
      B2P011: Other
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
      • Tools for prototyping and modelling,
      • Tools, spaces, events for testing and validation
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      • Energy
      B2P016: Execution of operations
      B2P016: Execution of operations
      B2P017: Capacities
      B2P017: Capacities
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P020: External accessibility
      B2P020: External accessibility
      C1P001: Unlocking Factors
      C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)Grid congestion which limits electrification possibilities
      C1P002: Driving Factors
      C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
      C1P003: Administrative barriers
      C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of public participation3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
      C1P004: Policy barriers
      C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)Financial cuts announced to high-education institutes announced by the Dutch government might affect sustainability plans or key organisation of the PED project
      C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
      C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Non-effective regulations4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
      C1P006: Environmental barriers
      C1P006: Environmental barriers- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Water Scarcity: 1 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1
      C1P007: Technical barriers
      C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Deficient planning3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Lack of well-defined process4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
      C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
      C1P008: Inertia4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Rebound effect4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
      C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
      C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
      C1P010: Financial barriers
      C1P010: Hidden costs5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Economic crisis5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Risk and uncertainty4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
      C1P011: Market barriers
      C1P011: Split incentives5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Energy price distortion4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
      C1P012: Stakeholders involved
      C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: Research & Innovation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      C1P012: Financial/Funding
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Business process management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: Urban Services providers
      • None
      C1P012: Real Estate developers
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Design/Construction companies
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Other
      C1P012: Other (if any)
      Summary

      Authors (framework concept)

      Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

      Contributors (to the content)

      Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

      Implemented by

      Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
      Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

      Join the Action

      PED-EU-NET is an open, interdisciplinary and growing network welcoming academics, practitioners and relevant stakeholders to contribute to the activities of the work plan.
      Join Now

      COST

      COST is an EU funding programme that enables researchers to set up their interdisciplinary research networks in Europe and beyond. We provide funds for organising conferences, meetings, training schools, short scientific exchanges or other networking activities in a wide range of scientific topics. By creating open spaces where people and ideas can grow, we unlock the full potential of science.

      PED-EU-NET

      The COST Action Positive Energy Districts European Network (PED-EU-NET) aims to mobilise researchers and other relevant stakeholders across different domains and sectors to drive the deployment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Europe through open sharing of knowledge, exchange of ideas, pooling of resources, experimentation of new methods and co-creation of novel solutions.

      Action Details

      Grant Holder
      Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome

      Start of Action: 10 September 2020
      End of Action: 09 September 2024
      CSO approval date: 24/03/2020

      © 2021-2023 PED-EU-NET COST Action CA19126. All rights reserved.