Name | Project | Type | Compare |
---|---|---|---|
Romania, Alba Iulia PED | ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
Romania, Alba Iulia PED | InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
Munich, Harthof district | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Lublin | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran | CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 | CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Findhorn, the Park | InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED | ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Umeå, Ålidhem district | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study | Compare |
Aalborg East | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Uncompare | |
Ankara, Çamlık District | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Trenčín | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Luxembourg, Betzdorf | LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Vantaa, Aviapolis | NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Uncompare |
Vidin, Himik and Bononia | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Oslo, Verksbyen | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
Uden, Loopkantstraat | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Zaragoza, Actur | NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Aarhus, Brabrand | BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city | ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins | PED Case Study | Compare |
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study | Uncompare |
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus | LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Espoo, Kera | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Freiburg, Waldsee | PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district | PED Case Study | Compare |
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Graz, Reininghausgründe | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Oulu, Kaukovainio | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Uncompare |
Halmstad, Fyllinge | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Lund, Brunnshög district | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Évora, Portugal | POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Uncompare |
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Groningen, PED South | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Lab | Uncompare |
Groningen, PED North | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Lab | Compare |
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Lab | Compare |
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT | PED Lab | Uncompare | |
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district | STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
Salzburg, Gneis district | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
Tartu, City centre area | SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district | GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab | PED Lab | Compare | |
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
Kifissia, Energy community | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Relevant Case Study |
Title | Kifissia, Energy community | Izmir, District of Karşıyaka | Vantaa, Aviapolis | Groningen, PED South | Évora, Portugal | Aalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, Denmark | Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT | Oulu, Kaukovainio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||||
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab | Kifissia, Energy community | Izmir, District of Karşıyaka | Vantaa, Aviapolis | Groningen, PED South | Évora, Portugal | Aalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, Denmark | Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT | Oulu, Kaukovainio |
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet | ||||||||
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet |
|
| ||||||
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site | ||||||||
PED case study | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
PED relevant case study | yes | no | yes | no | yes | yes | no | no |
PED Lab. | no | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | no |
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||||
Climate neutrality | no | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | no | yes |
Annual energy surplus | no | yes | no | yes | yes | no | no | no |
Energy community | yes | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | no |
Circularity | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | yes |
Air quality and urban comfort | yes | yes | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
Electrification | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
Net-zero energy cost | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
Net-zero emission | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | no |
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous) | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
Maximise self-sufficiency | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
Other | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
Other (A1P004) | ||||||||
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||||
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED Lab | Planning Phase | Planning Phase | Planning Phase | Implementation Phase | Implementation Phase | Planning Phase | Implementation Phase | In operation |
A1P006: Start Date | ||||||||
A1P006: Start date | 10/22 | 01/23 | 12/18 | 10/19 | 11/22 | 11/19 | ||
A1P007: End Date | ||||||||
A1P007: End date | 10/25 | 12/27 | 12/23 | 09/24 | 11/25 | 12/23 | ||
A1P008: Reference Project | ||||||||
A1P008: Reference Project | ||||||||
A1P009: Data availability | ||||||||
A1P009: Data availability |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
A1P009: Other | Other | |||||||
A1P010: Sources | ||||||||
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab |
|
| ||||||
A1P011: Geographic coordinates | ||||||||
X Coordinate (longitude): | 23.814588 | 27.110049 | 24.958821 | 6.590655 | -7.909377 | 10.007 | -2.508 | 25.517595084093507 |
Y Coordinate (latitude): | 38.077349 | 38.496054 | 60.305488 | 53.204087 | 38.570804 | 57.041028 | 41.603 | 64.99288098173132 |
A1P012: Country | ||||||||
A1P012: Country | Greece | Turkey | Finland | Netherlands | Portugal | Denmark | Spain | Finland |
A1P013: City | ||||||||
A1P013: City | Municipality of Kifissia | İzmir | Vantaa | Groningen | Évora | Aalborg | Lubia - Soria | Oulu |
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification) | ||||||||
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification). | Csa | Csa | Dfb | Cfa | Csa | Dfb | Cfb | Dfc |
A1P015: District boundary | ||||||||
A1P015: District boundary | Virtual | Geographic | Geographic | Functional | Geographic | Virtual | Geographic | |
Other | The energy will be produced by a PV plant installed on the terrace of a municipal building. Members of the energy community (that is under formation) will benefit from the energy produced via virtual net metering. PV instalment and the buildings (owned by the members of the community) will be within the boundaries of the Municipality but not necessary in the same area/district/neighbourhood | Regional (close to virtual) | ||||||
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab | ||||||||
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab: | Private | Mixed | Mixed | Mixed | Public | Public | Mixed | |
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure | ||||||||
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure: | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | Single Owner | Single Owner | |
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED | ||||||||
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED | 21 | 4 | 6 | 6 | ||||
A1P019: Conditioned space | ||||||||
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²] | 102795 | 7.86 | 19700 | |||||
A1P020: Total ground area | ||||||||
A1P020: Total ground area [m²] | 32600 | 3881000 | 45.093 | 31308000 | 6400000 | 60000 | ||
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area | ||||||||
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A1P022: Financial schemes | ||||||||
A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estate | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | yes |
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||||
A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO scheme | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||||
A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Other | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | no |
A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||||
A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural funding | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||||
A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National funding | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||||
A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional funding | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||||
A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal funding | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | yes |
A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||||
A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Other | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||||
A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EU | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | no | yes |
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | 1193355 | 19998275 | ||||||
A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - National | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | yes | no |
A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||||
A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regional | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||||
A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Other | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||||
A1P022: Other | Multiple different funding schemes depending on the development site within the District and Lab. | |||||||
A1P023: Economic Targets | ||||||||
A1P023: Economic Targets |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
A1P023: Other | Developing and demonstrating new solutions | |||||||
A1P024: More comments: | ||||||||
A1P024: More comments: | The Centre for the Development of Renewable Energy (CEDER)is specialized in applied research, development and promotion of renewable energy. Among the facilities of this Centre, the urban laboratory CEDER-CIEMAT assess the performance of different configurations of energy networks at the district level. This PED-Lab infrastructure is an energy district that connects six office buildings with energy generation installations by means of two energy rings: electrical grid (in operation phase) and thermal network (in the implementation phase). The buildings of this PED Lab can act as energy demanders or suppliers depending on the climatic and operational conditions. The majority of these buildings are constructed with conventional technologies but some of them are implemented with efficient and sustainable measures. The thermal network is composed by two biomass boilers, 300 kW power each, and water tanks with 90 kWh of thermal storage. This network will shortly be expanded with a low temperature (90°C) and high temperature (150°-250°C) rings. The low-temperature ring is made up by two Stirling engine cogeneration boilers (one biomass gasification boiler and one gas boiler). The high-temperature ring has a thermal generator made up of Fresnel solar concentrators and an ORC cogeneration system fed directly from the solar concentrator. The high-temperature ring is interconnected with the low-temperature ring through an oil/water heat exchanger. This network has thermal storage systems in the modalities of: aquifers, boreholes, phase change materials, cold storage with geothermal exchange ground recovery and thermal storage at very low temperature with zeolites. The electrical grid incorporates different renewable generation technologies (50 kW wind turbine and eight different photovoltaic systems, a reversible hydraulic system), and engine generator of 100 kVA, electricity storages (batteries) and flexible loads. | |||||||
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs | ||||||||
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR] | 5 | |||||||
Contact person for general enquiries | ||||||||
A1P026: Name | Artemis Giavasoglou, Kleopatra Kalampoka | Ozlem Senyol | Eira Linko | Jasper Tonen, Elisabeth Koops | João Bravo Dias | Kristian Olesen | Dr. Raquel Ramos | Samuli Rinne |
A1P027: Organization | Municipality of Kifissia – SPARCS local team | Karsiyaka Municipality | City of Vantaa | Municipality of Groningen | EDP Labelec | Aalborg University | Centre for the Development of Renewable Energy (CEDER) - Centre for Energy, Environment and Technology Research (CIEMAT) | City of Oulu |
A1P028: Affiliation | Municipality / Public Bodies | Municipality / Public Bodies | Municipality / Public Bodies | Municipality / Public Bodies | SME / Industry | Research Center / University | Research Center / University | Municipality / Public Bodies |
A1P028: Other | ||||||||
A1P029: Email | giavasoglou@kifissia.gr | ozlemkocaer2@gmail.com | eira.linko@vantaa.fi | Jasper.tonen@groningen.nl | joao.bravodias@edp.pt | Kristian@plan.aau.dk | raquel.ramos@ciemat.es | samuli.rinne@ouka.fi |
Contact person for other special topics | ||||||||
A1P030: Name | Stavros Zapantis - vice mayor | Hasan Burak Cavka | Alex Søgaard Moreno | Dr. Oscar Seco | Samuli Rinne | |||
A1P031: Email | stavros.zapantis@gmail.com | hasancavka@iyte.edu.tr | asm@aalborg.dk | oscar.seco@ciemat.es | samuli.rinne@ouka.fi | |||
Pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
A2P001: Fields of application | ||||||||
A2P001: Fields of application |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A2P001: Other | ||||||||
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields | ||||||||
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields | Methods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4). In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED. | Pilot collaboration with landowners. Carbon footprint assessment and planning guidelines in zoning planning. Green infrastructure requirements. Examples of considered energy solutions: waste heat recovery and utilization, geothermal, air-water heat pumps, district heating return water, photovoltaics, A-class energy efficiency, smart control and monitoring, energy storages, E-mobility above national requirements, cooling | Energy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streams | Stakeholder engagement, expert energy system analysis, future scenarios | Energy efficiency: - Buildings energy retrofit. Energy production: - Biomass Boiler capacity: 0.6 MW. Annual production: 1.2 GWh - Solar thermal collectors: 70 kW, planned extended to: 0.47MW - Geotermal & Absorption Pumps: 100 kW - Share of renewables after extension: 100% (30% solar thermal and 70% biomass) - AOC 50kW wind turbine. Awaiting installation of a two-way AC-AC converter for subsequent connection to the grid - Bornay Inclin 3 kW wind turbine, connected to 24 Vdc batteries, to be connected to the grid by means of Xantrex inverter/charger - 9kW photovoltaic park (66PV panels, brand BP Solar,type BP5140,of 140W) connected to the grid by means of two INGECON SUN 5 inverters - 5kW photovoltaic pergola (24PV panels, brand Solon, type P200, of 210W) connected to the grid by means of one INGECON SUN 5 inverter - 8.28kW photovoltaic roof (36PV panels, Brand LDK, type LDK-230P-20), connected to the grid by means of one INGECONSUN 10 inverter - 12kW photovoltaic roof (80PV panels, brand Gamesa, type GS-1501), connected to the grid. - Reversible hydraulic system connected to a 60 kW electric generator and a pumping system. -Stirling engine with a heat lamp based on natural gas, a helium cool lamp, 10kWe maximum power delivered and global performance of approximately 33%. Energy flexibility: - Thermal storage systems: water tanks 90kW, aquifers, boreholes, phase change materials, cold storage with geothermal exchange ground recovery and thermal storage at very low temperature with zeolites. - Electrical storage systems: batteries (lead-acid and lithium-ion). - Flexible loads. Control systems and Digital technologies: - Full monitoring campaign. - Smart-meters installation to monitor consumption and suggest another energy behaviours. - Dynamic simulation tools to optimize the energy performance. Urban comfort and air quality: - Meteorological stations to monitor the climate evolution. - Microclimatic simulation tools to quantify the thermal behaviour. | Different kinds of waste heat streams are utilized by heat pumps. These are district heating return water (actually this is an indirect way to cool down the flue gas in the scrubber), ventilation exhaust air and sewage water. As a normal case, in ventilation also air-to-air heat exchanges are used. PV power is harvested also, in vertical and more horizontal panels. Buildings are well insulated to decrease the needed amount of heating energy in the first place. | ||
A2P003: Application of ISO52000 | ||||||||
A2P003: Application of ISO52000 | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | |
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance | ||||||||
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | ||
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance | ||||||||
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | ||
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation | ||||||||
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation | Mobility is not included in the calculations. | The calculation of the energy balance will be further developed and specified under the Neutralpath-project. Mobility related emissions are taken into account in the carbon footprint calculation of each zoning plan in the development area. | Mobility, till now, is not included in the energy model. | Large combined industrial, residential, and commercial area with complex flows of in- and outgoing traffic. | Not included. However, there is a charging place for a shared EV in one building. | |||
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand | ||||||||
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum] | 3.862 | 1.86 | 218 | 2.1 | ||||
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand | ||||||||
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum] | 1.226 | 1.45 | 148 | 0.2 | ||||
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility | ||||||||
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure | ||||||||
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year | ||||||||
A2P011: PV | yes | yes | yes | no | no | no | yes | yes |
A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 1.028 | 0.1 | ||||||
A2P011: Wind | no | no | no | no | no | yes | yes | no |
A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P011: Hydro | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P011: Biomass_el | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P011: PVT_el | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P011: Other | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year | ||||||||
A2P012: Geothermal | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | yes | no |
A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P012: Solar Thermal | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | no |
A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P012: Biomass_heat | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | no |
A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P012: Waste heat+HP | no | no | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 300 | 2.2 | ||||||
A2P012: Biomass_peat_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P012: PVT_th | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P012: Biomass_firewood_th | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P012: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes | ||||||||
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes | Geothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centers | Very little wind production currently exists in the area. The electricity production of the waste incineration plant will be included at a later date. Aalborg East is partly a remarkable area for hosting a Portland cement factory that accounts for a substantial share of Denmark’s total CO2 emissions. In turn, it also provides waste heat to the district heating grid for all of Aalborg city and some of the smaller towns that are connected to the same DH grid. | Heat is produced from DH return, refrigeration and exhaust air. The mentioned 2200 MWh/a includes HP el. consumption (about 1/6 of that) | |||||
A2P014: Annual energy use | ||||||||
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum] | 5.088 | 620 | 2.3 | |||||
A2P015: Annual energy delivered | ||||||||
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum] | 399 | |||||||
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year | ||||||||
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | 0 | |||||||
A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year | ||||||||
A2P017: Gas | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P017: Coal | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P017: Oil | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P017: Other | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | 300 | |||||||
A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year | ||||||||
A2P018: PV | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | 0.707 | |||||||
A2P018: Wind | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P018: Hydro | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P018: Biomass_el | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P018: Biomass_peat_el | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P018: PVT_el | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P018: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year | ||||||||
A2P019: Geothermal | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P019: Solar Thermal | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P019: Biomass_heat | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.7 | |||||||
A2P019: Waste heat+HP | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P019: Biomass_peat_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P019: PVT_th | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P019: Biomass_firewood_th | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P019: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary | ||||||||
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary | 0 | 1.4540311173975 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.2857142857143 |
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED | ||||||||
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum] | 0 | |||||||
A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||||
A2P022: Safety & Security | ||||||||
A2P022: Health | Encouraging a healthy lifestyle | |||||||
A2P022: Education | ||||||||
A2P022: Mobility | Modal Split, Fuel mix in mobility, Energy use for transportation, Access to public transport, Public infrastructure promoting low-carbon mobility, Number of public EV charging stations, Energy delivered for EV charging | |||||||
A2P022: Energy | Final energy consumption, Primary energy consumption, Energy imported to PED, Energy exported from PED, RES production, PED energy balance, Energy savings in the PED, GHG emissions, Reduction of emissions, Final energy consumption per capita, Primary energy consumption per capita, Primary energy sources (shares), Buildings connected to DH-network or renewable energy grid, GHG emissions per capita, System flexibility for energy players, RES storage usage, Peak load reduction | |||||||
A2P022: Water | ||||||||
A2P022: Economic development | Total investments, Payback time, Economic value of savings | |||||||
A2P022: Housing and Community | Development of housing prices, Housing cost overburden rate, Citizen engagement/empowerment to climate conscious actions, Inhabitants in dense areas, Energy poverty | |||||||
A2P022: Waste | Recycling rate | |||||||
A2P022: Other | Smart Cities strategies, Quality of open data | |||||||
A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation | ||||||||
A2P023: Photovoltaics | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
A2P023: Solar thermal collectors | no | no | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no |
A2P023: Wind Turbines | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
A2P023: Geothermal energy system | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | yes | no |
A2P023: Waste heat recovery | no | no | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
A2P023: Waste to energy | no | no | yes | yes | no | yes | no | no |
A2P023: Polygeneration | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no |
A2P023: Co-generation | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | yes |
A2P023: Heat Pump | no | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
A2P023: Hydrogen | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
A2P023: Hydropower plant | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
A2P023: Biomass | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | yes | yes |
A2P023: Biogas | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P023: Other | The technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case. | |||||||
A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility | ||||||||
A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) | no | no | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | yes |
A2P024: Energy management system | no | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
A2P024: Demand-side management | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | yes | no |
A2P024: Smart electricity grid | no | no | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | no |
A2P024: Thermal Storage | no | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
A2P024: Electric Storage | no | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | no |
A2P024: District Heating and Cooling | no | no | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systems | no | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | no |
A2P024: P2P – buildings | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
A2P024: Other | The technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case. | |||||||
A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency | ||||||||
A2P025: Deep Retrofitting | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | yes | yes |
A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildings | no | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | no |
A2P025: High-performance new buildings | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | yes |
A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting) | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
A2P025: Urban data platforms | no | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | yes |
A2P025: Mobile applications for citizens | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting) | no | yes | yes | no | yes | no | yes | yes |
A2P025: Smart irrigation | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposal | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
A2P025: Smart surveillance | no | no | no | no | yes | yes | no | no |
A2P025: Other | The technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case. | |||||||
A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility | ||||||||
A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private) | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances) | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P026: e-Mobility | no | no | yes | yes | yes | no | no | yes |
A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutions | no | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | yes |
A2P026: Car-free area | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
A2P026: Other | ||||||||
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes | ||||||||
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes | ||||||||
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates | ||||||||
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes | Energy Performance Certificate - in Greece it is mandatory in order to buy or rent a house or a dwelling | Energy Performance Certificate | In Spain it is mandatory the Energy Performance Certificate in order to buy or rent a house or a dwelling | The obligatory buildijng energy classification | ||||
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates | ||||||||
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates | No | No | No | No | No | |||
A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes | ||||||||
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy | ||||||||
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy | ||||||||
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy | Karşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030. System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023. | Carbon-Neutral Vantaa by 2030 (min. 80 % reduction of yearly emissions, capture or compensation os the residual 20 %), | Reduction of 1018000 tons CO2 by 2030 | - Testing the combination of renewable technologies at district level. - Optimization of the generation side based on the weather forecasting and demand side. - Optimization of the control system, connected to the central node, to design and perform virtual analyses based on the combination of all the systems and infrastructures. - Optimization of ICT systems. - Design and management of a virtual analysis - Optimization of efficient measures: building performance, user´s behaviour… - Combination of flexible storage systems to operate the global installation. | Carbon neutrality by 2035 | |||
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid | ||||||||
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid |
|
|
|
| ||||
A3P003: Other | ||||||||
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities | ||||||||
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities | According to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario. | Decarbonize part of Aalborg city as a way of working incrementally towards being a zero-emission city. | - Create a thermal energy storage tank to be used for air conditioning the buildings. - Some buildings need to be renovated both to increase the energy performance, the seismic behaviour and spaces liveability and comfort. - Optimizing the coupling between technologies. - Guarantee the flexibility to operate the renewable installations to operate in different phases and with different configurations. - CEDER is a public research center and needs to have connected any energy system to the same grid. - CEDER has an industrial develop area where some experimental thermal storage system could be tested. | Developing and demonstrating solutions for carbon neutrality | ||||
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour | ||||||||
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour | In Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed. | - Stakeholder engagement; - Focus on implementing renewable energy production where possible; - Rretrofitting and energy optimization of existing buildings. | - Minimize the building energy consumption while maintaining indoor comfort levels. - Onsite renewable production with flexible storage elements to fix demand side and generation side. - Flexible control solutions through digitalization systems. | E. g. visualizing energy and water consumption | ||||
A3P006: Economic strategies | ||||||||
A3P006: Economic strategies |
|
|
|
|
| |||
A3P006: Other | ||||||||
A3P007: Social models | ||||||||
A3P007: Social models |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
A3P007: Other | ||||||||
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies | ||||||||
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
A3P008: Other | ||||||||
A3P009: Environmental strategies | ||||||||
A3P009: Environmental strategies |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
A3P009: Other | ||||||||
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects | ||||||||
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects | At national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen: Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation. Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries. The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals. Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricity | Current energy tariffs disincentivize both individual and collective PV systems – meaning energy communities are not economically feasible, housing associations and public buildings struggle with finding a secure RoI for solar panels, and citizens and local industry lack an incentive to install solar panels on their own | - European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (Renewable energy directive - 2018/2001/EU and Common rules for the internal electricity market directive- 2019/944/EU). - Spanish building certification is regulated through Royal Decree 235/2013. | |||||
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition | ||||||||
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition | The pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED). | Neutralpath-project is working with the cocept of PCEDs = Positive and Clean Energy Districts (energy-efficient and energy-flexible districts with net zero greenhouse gas emissions and a surplus of renewable energy). Aviapolis Climate-Neutral Lab will work with both PCED and PCED relevant cases within the district. | The PED main objective is to achieve the energy transition while preserving cultural heritage and improving citizen’s quality of life. | The large scale provides interesting opportunities for both urban development and strategic energy planning; the diverse mix of buildings and functions also allow for interesting discussions regarding PEDs. Another interesting facet is that the district heating grid is almost fully supplied by waste heat. | The original idea is that the area produces at least as much it consumes. | |||
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development | ||||||||
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development | According to Vantaa city strategy 2021-2025 Aviapolis area aims to become the greenest airport city in Europe. The district is transforming from a logistics and business focused area to a lively urban district which gives an opportunity to rethink the areas energy solutions. With Neutralpath-project Vantaa aims to support the development of the district's energy system and explore innovative, energy efficient and fossil free district energy solutions. | POCITYF brings together eight cities (Lightouse and Fellow cities), all having cultural heritage areas in their territory. All are intrinsically motivated to participate in the necessary energy transition not only for their conventional city districts of mixed-used, but also for districts with individually specificities as those belonging in their cultural heritage, which at the moment may be acting as barriers for their further environmental sustainability, but after POCITYF will be acting as a promising building retrofits roadmap for similar and other EU cities. | The area has an interesting history of development and has recently undergone several urban improvements. This is coupled with a strong local network of business owners and other stakeholders, all with an interest in developing the area in the best way possible. This made for an interesting case from a planning perspective to investigate how this network would pick up on the concept of PED and whether they could see any potential utility in relation to their everyday experiences. | Developing systems towards carbon neutrality. Also urban renewal. | ||||
B1P003: Environment of the case study area | ||||||||
B2P003: Environment of the case study area | Urban area | Urban area | Urban area | Suburban area | Rural | Suburban area | ||
B1P004: Type of district | ||||||||
B2P004: Type of district |
|
|
|
|
| |||
B1P005: Case Study Context | ||||||||
B1P005: Case Study Context |
|
|
|
|
| |||
B1P006: Year of construction | ||||||||
B1P006: Year of construction | 2005 | |||||||
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential | ||||||||
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential | 16.931 | 3500 | ||||||
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential | ||||||||
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential | 3500 | |||||||
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential | ||||||||
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential | ||||||||
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential | ||||||||
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential | ||||||||
B1P011: Population density before intervention | ||||||||
B1P011: Population density before intervention | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
B1P012: Population density after intervention | ||||||||
B1P012: Population density after intervention | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.058333333333333 |
B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention | ||||||||
B1P013: Residential | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²] | 102795 | |||||||
B1P013: Office | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||
B1P013: Industry and Utility | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||
B1P013: Commercial | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||
B1P013: Institutional | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||
B1P013: Natural areas | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||
B1P013: Recreational | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||
B1P013: Dismissed areas | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||
B1P013: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||
B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention | ||||||||
B1P014: Residential | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²] | 102795 | |||||||
B1P014: Office | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||
B1P014: Industry and Utility | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||
B1P014: Commercial | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||
B1P014: Institutional | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||
B1P014: Natural areas | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||
B1P014: Recreational | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||
B1P014: Dismissed areas | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||
B1P014: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition | ||||||||
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition | Neutralpath-project is working with the cocept of PCEDs = Positive and Clean Energy Districts (energy-efficient and energy-flexible districts with net zero greenhouse gas emissions and a surplus of renewable energy). Aviapolis Climate-Neutral Lab will work with both PCED and PCED relevant cases within the district. | Groningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city. | An ongoing process and dialogue with local stakeholders to determine the future development of the area. | |||||
B2P002: Installation life time | ||||||||
B2P002: Installation life time | The MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact. | No new installation will be made throughout the project. Rather the project will attempt to establish a local PED network with the aim of empowering the stakeholders to better engage with sustainable technologies. | CEDER will follow an integrative approach including technology for a permanent installation. | |||||
B2P003: Scale of action | ||||||||
B2P003: Scale | District | District | District | District | District | |||
B2P004: Operator of the installation | ||||||||
B2P004: Operator of the installation | The City of Vantaa manages the lab, working closely with landowners and other stakeholders such as energy companies, solution providers, universities and citizens. | The Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties. | Kristian Olesen | CIEMAT. Data detail in contact: mariano.martin@ciemat.es and oscar.izquiedo@ciemat.es | ||||
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials | ||||||||
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials | Groningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materials | Replication is primarily focused on the establishment of a local network with an interest in and understanding of PED. | ||||||
B2P006: Circular Economy Approach | ||||||||
B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials? | No | No | No | |||||
B2P006: Other | ||||||||
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab | ||||||||
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab |
|
|
|
| ||||
B2P007: Other | ||||||||
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab | ||||||||
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab | Municipality | Municipality | Research center/University | Research center/University | ||||
B2P008: Other | ||||||||
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab | ||||||||
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab |
|
|
|
| ||||
B2P009: Other | research companies, monitoring company, ict company | |||||||
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities | ||||||||
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities | The operation of the laboratory with all the components of the energy networks requires a collaborative work between various departments and entities. On the one hand, it is necessary to optimize the operation of renewable systems based on the weather conditions, forecast of the demand side and the flexibility of the generation systems. On the other hand, the optimization of the energy demands through a more sustainable behaviour of both the building and the users want to be acquired. For this, it is necessary to take into account technical aspects but also market, comfort and encourage the user participation, creating a decision-making matrix that allows optimizing the operation of the global system. | |||||||
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab | ||||||||
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab |
|
|
| |||||
B2P011: Other | ||||||||
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab | ||||||||
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab |
|
|
| |||||
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people | ||||||||
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people | ||||||||
B2P014: Monitoring measures | ||||||||
B2P014: Monitoring measures |
|
| ||||||
B2P015: Key Performance indicators | ||||||||
B2P015: Key Performance indicators |
|
|
|
| ||||
B2P016: Execution of operations | ||||||||
B2P016: Execution of operations | ||||||||
B2P017: Capacities | ||||||||
B2P017: Capacities | - Innovative grid configuration to connect bio boilers and solar thermal on buildings. - Environmental & air quality evaluation. - Testing and evaluation of high efficient heating & cooling systems: Gas, biomass, geothermal and absorption H&C pumps … - Definition and implementation of the different regulation modes for the global system. Using the data from the research focused-partners, several regulation modes for the DH network could be defined and implemented in order to obtain an optimal operation of the network. - Innovation in MPC control to enable harvesting 100% renewables in the most efficient way. - Physical integration of the technologies with the existing facilities at the living lab. - Connection between the solar thermal collectors to achieve the lowest heat losses, providing the possibility to use the grid as high or low temperature DH, according to the demand schedule of the buildings. - Test the bio-boiler of the last generation and ultra-low emissions biomass condensing boiler in order to increase efficiency and reduce GHG and air pollutant emissions of the DH plant. - Control of the supply temperature of the DH grid to enable 100% renewables harvesting in the most efficient way. - Research of the incidence of a normal building or a bioclimatic building in the DH grid demand. - Methodologies for concept validation: Definition of the minimum requirements to verify the suitability of the solutions proposed. - Tests campaign: Experimental operation and characterization in a relevant environment, to exploit the technologies at their best and test different demand profiles, different configuration and loads, with real time monitoring and continuous commissioning to control the performance of the technology. - Validation and upgrading recommendation for the DH&C at district level. - Evaluation of innovation actions for potential energy interventions with demand response in buildings. - The complete available infrastructure (MV and LV electric systems, transformation hubs, end consumption, generation sources, communication elements, etc.) belongs to CEDER-CIEMAT, making this the perfect scenario to test and try the performance of “Smart Grid” and “Microgrid” projects. - The type of electric grid, its voltage levels (MV or LV), its variety of real loads (different buildings with different profiles: industrial buildings, offices and so on) and its sources of renewable generation and storage, mean it is ideal for intermediate tests between a small-scale laboratory and final deployment of the real product. | |||||||
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders | ||||||||
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders | CEDER - CIEMAT is a public research body assigned to the Ministry of Science and Innovation under the General Secretariat for Research, focusing on energy and environment. To develop this lab CIEMAT has relations with private renewable companies, research centers and academia institutions. | |||||||
B2P019: Available tools | ||||||||
B2P019: Available tools |
|
|
| |||||
B2P019: Available tools | ||||||||
B2P020: External accessibility | ||||||||
B2P020: External accessibility | To follow the lab and Vantaa's activities in Neutralpath, fill in the following form: https://neutralpath.eu/fi/tayta-lomake-liittyaksesi-cn-labiin/ | CIEMAT is a public body, so it´s open to any institution according the actual regulation and agreements. | ||||||
C1P001: Unlocking Factors | ||||||||
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important |
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important |
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important |
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | |
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up) | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important |
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down) | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important |
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.) | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important |
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important |
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important |
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important |
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES) | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | |
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important |
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any) | Real-estate market situation | |||||||
C1P002: Driving Factors | ||||||||
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency) | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important |
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important |
C1P002: Economic growth need | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important |
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.) | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important |
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important |
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important |
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any) | Earthquakes due to gas extraction | |||||||
C1P003: Administrative barriers | ||||||||
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important |
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant |
C1P003: Lack of public participation | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important |
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important |
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important |
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important |
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important |
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos) | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important |
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important |
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any) | ||||||||
C1P004: Policy barriers | ||||||||
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important |
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important |
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important |
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any) | ||||||||
C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers | ||||||||
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important |
C1P005: Regulatory instability | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important |
C1P005: Non-effective regulations | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important |
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant |
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important |
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important |
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important |
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any) | ||||||||
C1P006: Environmental barriers | ||||||||
C1P006: Environmental barriers | - Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 - Water Scarcity: 1 | 3 - Moderately important | ||||||
C1P007: Technical barriers | ||||||||
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important |
C1P007: Deficient planning | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant |
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant |
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant |
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important |
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important |
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any) | ||||||||
C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers | ||||||||
C1P008: Inertia | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important |
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant |
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important |
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant |
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant |
C1P008: Rebound effect | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant |
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important |
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant |
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important |
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any) | ||||||||
C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers | ||||||||
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any) | ||||||||
C1P010: Financial barriers | ||||||||
C1P010: Hidden costs | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P010: Economic crisis | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any) | ||||||||
C1P011: Market barriers | ||||||||
C1P011: Split incentives | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P011: Energy price distortion | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs) | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any) | ||||||||
C1P012: Stakeholders involved | ||||||||
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities |
|
|
|
| ||||
C1P012: Research & Innovation |
|
|
|
| ||||
C1P012: Financial/Funding |
|
|
| |||||
C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data |
|
|
|
| ||||
C1P012: Business process management |
|
|
| |||||
C1P012: Urban Services providers |
|
|
| |||||
C1P012: Real Estate developers |
|
|
|
| ||||
C1P012: Design/Construction companies |
|
|
|
| ||||
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens |
|
|
|
| ||||
C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs |
|
|
| |||||
C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce |
|
|
|
| ||||
C1P012: Other | ||||||||
C1P012: Other (if any) | ||||||||
Summary |
Authors (framework concept)
Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)
Contributors (to the content)
Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)
Implemented by
Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)