Search
Close this search box.
Search
Map View
Table View
Projects
Filters:
Clear Filters Export All Entries (CSV)
NameProjectTypeCompare
Örebro-Vivalla JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Texel JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hällefors, Sweden JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Uncompare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Uncompare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study
TitleKifissia, Energy community
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka
«×»
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district
«×»
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund
«×»
Ydalir project, Elverum
«×»
Ankara, Çamlık District
«×»
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo
«×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabKifissia, Energy communityIzmir, District of KarşıyakaBologna, Pilastro-Roveri districtCityfied (demo Linero), LundYdalir project, ElverumAnkara, Çamlık DistrictSmart Otaniemi, Espoo
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynoyesnonoyesyesno
PED relevant case studyyesnoyesyesnoyesyes
PED Lab.nonononononoyes
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralitynoyesyesyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusnoyesnononoyesno
Energy communityyesnoyesnonoyesno
Circularitynonononononono
Air quality and urban comfortyesyesnonononono
Electrificationyesnonononoyesno
Net-zero energy costnoyesnononoyesno
Net-zero emissionnononoyesyesyesno
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nonononononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynoyesnononoyesno
Othernononoyesyesnoyes
Other (A1P004)Social aspects/affordabilityEnergy efficient; Sustainable neighbourhood; Energy neutralSocial aspects/affordability; societal development, innovation capabilities, export businesses; new investing possibilities
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabPlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhaseCompletedIn operationPlanning PhaseIn operation
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date10/2209/1901/1401/1610/2201/18
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date10/2510/2312/1909/25
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets
A1P009: OtherOther
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
    • Boeri, A., Boulanger, S., Turci, G., Pagliula, S. (2021) Strategie e tecnologie abilitanti per PED misti: efficienza tra smart cities e industria 4.0. TECHNE, 22, 180-190,
    • Barroco Fontes Cunha F., Carani C., Nucci C.A., Castro C., Santana Silva M., Andrade Torres E. (2021) Transitioning to a low carbon society through energy communities: Lessons learned from Brazil and Italy, ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2021, 75, 1-19.,
    • GRETA Project, Pilastro-Roveri case study. Available at: https://projectgreta.eu/case-study/renewable-energy-district/
    A1P011: Geographic coordinates
    X Coordinate (longitude):23.81458827.11004911.39732313.24337511.58020432.79536924.830265
    Y Coordinate (latitude):38.07734938.49605444.50710655.69922360.89187839.88181260.183989
    A1P012: Country
    A1P012: CountryGreeceTurkeyItalySwedenNorwayTurkeyFinland
    A1P013: City
    A1P013: CityMunicipality of KifissiaİzmirBolognaLundElverumAnkaraEspoo
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CsaCsaCfaCfbDfbDsbDfb
    A1P015: District boundary
    A1P015: District boundaryVirtualGeographicGeographicGeographic
    OtherThe energy will be produced by a PV plant installed on the terrace of a municipal building. Members of the energy community (that is under formation) will benefit from the energy produced via virtual net metering. PV instalment and the buildings (owned by the members of the community) will be within the boundaries of the Municipality but not necessary in the same area/district/neighbourhood
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:PrivateMixedMixedPublicPrivateMixed
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple Owners
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED211962257
    A1P019: Conditioned space
    A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]10279522600
    A1P020: Total ground area
    A1P020: Total ground area [m²]3260078000008000043000050800
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0300000
    A1P022: Financial schemes
    A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estatenonononononono
    A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
    A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernonononononoyes
    A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]39000000
    A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononononono
    A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnonoyesnononono
    A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonoyesnononono
    A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnonoyesnononono
    A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernononoyesnonono
    A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnoyesyesnonoyesno
    A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]1193355
    A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnoyesnononoyesno
    A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonoyesnononono
    A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernononoyesnonoyes
    A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]27000000
    A1P022: Other
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Job creation,
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local businesses
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    A1P023: Other
    A1P024: More comments:
    A1P024: More comments:The Pilastro-Roveri area is a large peri-urban district in the northeast of the city of Bologna (about 650 hectares). In particular, the northern area is mainly characterised by the residential sector of Rione Pilastro, a significant complex of social housing built in the 1960s in response to the housing emergency due to migrations from southern Italy and nowadays satisfying more global migrations. The southern area is instead characterised by the presence of the production district called Roveri. The area appears relevant for the research as it has several evolution potentials towards a climate-neutral district. In particular some key factors are interesting: - the presence of one of the largest photovoltaic parks in Europe on the roofs of CAAB, characterised by a production of 11,350,000 Kw/h of primary energy; - the presence of companies attentive to the issues of climate change and energy, able to act as facilitators for the area. This is the case of FIVE, a leader in the production of electric bicycles, whose plant is the first nZEB (nearly Zero Energy Building) productive building in the city; - the high presence of industrial buildings of different sizes needing a reduction in energy consumption; - the presence of obsolete, sometimes in decay, and of general highly energy-intensive buildings in the Pilastro area, accompanied by spread phenomena of energy poverty; - the presence of spaces that could be converted (e.g. unused warehouses, unexploited green areas, etc.); - the presence of an active community, characterised by numerous associations, but also by social challenges linked to multiple vulnerabilities; - the presence of local actors interested in the development of the area (including the Municipality, the University, Confindustria, ENEA, Confartigianato, etc.). Two main research projects are actually ongoing in the area, applying solutions towards energy improvement and transition strategies to guide the area towards climate neutrality: - GECO - Green Energy Community, funded by EIT Climate-KIC and active since 2019, aims to trigger a virtuous path of energy sharing between companies and citizens through the creation of an energy community. - GRETA - Green Energy Transition Actions, funded by the H2020 programme, aims to understand drivers and barriers on the involvement of citizens in the energy transition processes, by formulating Community Transition Pathways and Energy Citizenship Contracts. [from: Boeri, A., Boulanger, S., Turci, G., Pagliula, S. (2021) Strategie e tecnologie abilitanti per PED misti: efficienza tra smart cities e industria 4.0. TECHNE, 22, 180-190]The urban morphology of Çamlık District differs in several ways, compared with the typical urban fabric in Türkiye, along with the capital city of Ankara. The houses on the site are composed of three-story attached single-housing units with multiple rows, creating a total of 257 housing units in total. Low-rise buildings coupled with suitably oriented rooftop surfaces brings about significant advantages in the site. Dense greenery in the site also results in reduced cooling energy demand in the buildings.
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]
    Contact person for general enquiries
    A1P026: NameArtemis Giavasoglou, Kleopatra KalampokaOzlem SenyolProf. Danila LongoChristoph GollnerChristoph GollnerProf. Dr. İpek Gürsel DİNOChristoph Gollner
    A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of Kifissia – SPARCS local teamKarsiyaka MunicipalityUniversity of Bologna - Architecture DepartmentFFGFFGMiddle East Technical UniversityFFG
    A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityOtherOtherResearch Center / UniversityOther
    A1P028: Other
    A1P029: Emailgiavasoglou@kifissia.grozlemkocaer2@gmail.comchristoph.gollner@ffg.atchristoph.gollner@ffg.atipekg@metu.edu.trchristoph.gollner@ffg.at
    Contact person for other special topics
    A1P030: NameStavros Zapantis - vice mayorHasan Burak CavkaAssoc. Prof. Onur Taylan
    A1P031: Emailstavros.zapantis@gmail.comhasancavka@iyte.edu.trotaylan@metu.edu.tr
    Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYes
    A2P001: Fields of application
    A2P001: Fields of application
    • Energy production
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.)
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Digital technologies,
    • Waste management
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy production
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy production,
    • Construction materials
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy production,
    • Construction materials
    • Digital technologies
    A2P001: Other
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsMethods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4). In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED.Energy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax incentives (110%, façade bonus, eco-bonus, sismabonus, renovation bonus, etc.); - several activities - such as Workshops, Webinars, Roundtables, Urban Trekking, etc…- are encouraged in the area to deepen knowledge and raise awareness on energy issues among urban stakeholders (householders, occupants, workers, etc..); - reduction in energy consumption also through every day energy saving actions. The spread of energy poverty phenomena in the area is considered urgent both for the medium-low-income population living in Pilastro and for small and medium-sized enterprises placed in Roveri; - Project for a One-stop-shop to guide residents and enterprises towards more conscious energy behaviours (planned in Bologna SECAP). Energy production: - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a waste to energy plant connected to the district heating system; - presence of a large PV plant in the CAAB area - 11,350,000 Kw/h Energy flexibility: - testing energy community and collective self-consumption feasibility in Pilastro area through an active citizens involvement process; - testing energy community feasibility among SMEs in Roveri industrial area; - testing the potential of complementary energy consumption profiles between residential area (Pilastro) and industrial area (Roveri). Digital technologies: - smart-meters installation in some dwellings in order to monitor consumption and suggest more sustainable energy behaviors; - Blog Pilastro as a tool to inform about the main activities and events ongoing in the area; E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; - e-bike/bikesharing services recovery (in fact during Covid-19 in the area Mobike service was suspended) and implementation. Urban comfort and air quality - Control units for air pollutants concentration (PM2.5, PM10, NO2); - Microclimatic simulationThe energy consumption and efficiency of the energy model of Çamlık Site, created using EnergyPlus software, have been evaluated under the scenarios specified below. At each stage, a new system was incorporated to explore the potential of the area becoming a PED. In this context, four scenarios were created to compare different energy scenarios for the Ankara pilot area and to observe the impact of the included systems on energy efficiency: V_base; V_ER; V_ER,HP; V_ER,HP,PV. The basic scenario (V_base) was created using the current state without any improvement to the building envelope. This scenario was developed to determine the annual energy needs of the entire site without any intervention and serves as a reference point for the other developed models. The second scenario (V_ER) was created to improve the building envelopes of all residential units in the area, altering the U-values according to Türkiye's current building standards (TS-825). The third scenario (V_ER,HP) primarily includes a heat pump model that can use electrical energy to produce higher thermal energy and is added on top of the improvements in the second scenario. Finally, the V_ER,HP,PV scenario combines building envelope improvements, the heat pump, and the solar PV system.
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000YesYesYes
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceYesNoYes
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNo
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationMobility is not included in the calculations.Mobility is not included in the calculations.
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]3.8623.446
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]1.2260.528
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P011: PVyesyesyesnonoyesno
    A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]1.0283.4240
    A2P011: Windnonononononono
    A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Hydrononononononono
    A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Biomass_elnonononononono
    A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: PVT_elnonononononono
    A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Othernonononononono
    A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P012: Geothermalnonononononono
    A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Solar Thermalnonoyesnononono
    A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Biomass_heatnonoyesnononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
    A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: PVT_thnonononononono
    A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Othernonononononono
    A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
    A2P014: Annual energy use
    A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]5.0883.976
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P017: Gasnoyesnononoyesno
    A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Coalnonononononono
    A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Oilnonononononono
    A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Othernonononononono
    A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P018: PVnoyesnonononono
    A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.707
    A2P018: Windnonononononono
    A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Hydrononononononono
    A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_elnonononononono
    A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
    A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
    A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Othernonononononono
    A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
    A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
    A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_heatnonononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
    A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
    A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Othernonononononono
    A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary01.454031117397500000
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]
    A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
    A2P022: Safety & Security
    A2P022: Health
    A2P022: Education
    A2P022: MobilityMode of transport; Access to public transport
    A2P022: EnergyEnergy efficiency in buildings; Net energy need; Gross energy need; Total energy need
    A2P022: Water
    A2P022: Economic development
    A2P022: Housing and CommunityDelivery and proximity to amenities
    A2P022: Waste
    A2P022: OtherGHG emissions; Power/load; Life cycle cost (LCC); Demographic needs and consultation plan; Public Space
    A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
    A2P023: Photovoltaicsnoyesyesyesnoyesno
    A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnonoyesyesyesnono
    A2P023: Wind Turbinesnonononononono
    A2P023: Geothermal energy systemnonoyesnononoyes
    A2P023: Waste heat recoverynonononononono
    A2P023: Waste to energynonoyesnononono
    A2P023: Polygenerationnonononononono
    A2P023: Co-generationnonoyesnononono
    A2P023: Heat Pumpnoyesyesyesnoyesno
    A2P023: Hydrogennonononononono
    A2P023: Hydropower plantnonononononono
    A2P023: Biomassnonononononono
    A2P023: Biogasnonononononono
    A2P023: Other
    A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
    A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)nonoyesnononono
    A2P024: Energy management systemnonononononono
    A2P024: Demand-side managementnonononononono
    A2P024: Smart electricity gridnonononononono
    A2P024: Thermal Storagenonononononono
    A2P024: Electric Storagenonoyesnononono
    A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnonoyesyesyesnoyes
    A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnonononononono
    A2P024: P2P – buildingsnonononononono
    A2P024: Other
    A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
    A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnoyesyesyesnoyesno
    A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnonononononono
    A2P025: High-performance new buildingsnonoyesnononono
    A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)nonoyesnononono
    A2P025: Urban data platformsnonononononono
    A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnonoyesnononono
    A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)noyesyesnonoyesno
    A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononononono
    A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonoyesnononono
    A2P025: Smart surveillancenonoyesnononono
    A2P025: Other
    A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
    A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nonoyesnononono
    A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)nonoyesnoyesnono
    A2P026: e-Mobilitynonoyesnononono
    A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnonoyesnononono
    A2P026: Car-free areanonononononono
    A2P026: Other
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesNoYesNo
    A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance Certificate - in Greece it is mandatory in order to buy or rent a house or a dwellingEnergy Performance Certificate for each dwelling
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoNo
    A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC)
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Urban Renewal Strategies,
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Smart cities strategies
    • Smart cities strategies
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Smart cities strategies
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyKarşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030. System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023.City level targets Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (PUMS) - 2019 | Targets: - by 2030 440,000 daily trips will no longer be made by car but on foot, by bike or by public transport; - by 2030 12% of vehicles will be electric; Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP) - 2021 | Targets: - by 2025 deep renovation of 3% per year of residential homes (insulation of building envelopes and adoption of heat pump heating system); - by 2030 reduction of electricity consumption at least of 20% compared to 2018; - by 2030 100% coverage of electricity consumption for municipal buildings; - by 2030 increase public green areas by at least 10% Urban General Plan (PUG) - 2021 | Targets: - by 2030 net zero land consumption; National level targets Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan - 2020 | Targets: - by 2030 reduction of 43% for primary energy consumption, with respect to the reference 2007 scenario. - by 2030 increase of 30% of energy production from renewable sources; - by 2025 energy generation for electricity independent from the use of coal;
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
    • Electrification of Cooking Methods
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
    A3P003: Other
    A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
    A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesAccording to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario.Bologna needs to reach the climate neutrality proceeding by ‘part’ of the city. Pilastro-Roveri is a promising district due to the following reasons: - some buildings need to be renovated both to increase the energy performance, the seismic behaviour, spaces liveability and comfort; - Pilastro is a residential area with the presence of a high percentage of vulnerable inhabitants affected by energy poverty phenomenon. This situation needs to be prioritized; - Pilastro is characterized by the presence of large underused green spaces that can represent a valuable resource for social cohesion and for heat island phenomenon mitigation; - Roveri is an industrial area where some small-medium enterprises are investing in order to improve their facilities and to efficiency their production cycle; - Roveri and Pilastro areas present complementary energy consumption curves throughout the day/week with a high potential for energy sharing and flexibility.According to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary with heat pumps. Rooftop photovoltaic panels also have the potential for renewable energy generation. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity through this scenario.
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviourBologna SECAP, as well as the participation to the 100 Climate-Neutral Cities, promotes the PED model as an enabling tool to foster city energy transition process. In Pilastro-Roveri district two main sustainable behaviours approaches can be identified: - bottom-up approach - some citizens are joining forces to create groups of energy self-consumption, in view of energy communities’ implementation and, at the same time, some companies have already undertaken some efficiency intervention on the production system by leveraging highly energy-efficient technologies; - top-down approach - GECO and GRETA are international ongoing projects on the area that promote innovation and energy transition with important fundings from the European Union, but with a particular focus on citizen engagement and participatory approach. Simultaneously, new and updated planning tools such as PUG, SECAP and SUMP identify in this part of Bologna city a key area to enable an ecological transition process holding together all relevant stakeholders - citizens, small-medium enterprises and Institutions. These two thrusts (bottom-up and top-down) need to be optimized in view of a participatory pathway towards the grounding of a Positive Energy District in Pilastro-Roveri.
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    • Innovative business models,
    • PPP models,
    • Circular economy models,
    • Demand management Living Lab,
    • Existing incentives
    • Innovative business models
    A3P006: Other
    A3P007: Social models
    A3P007: Social models
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Affordability
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Citizen Social Research,
    • Policy Forums,
    • Affordability,
    • Prevention of energy poverty,
    • Digital Inclusion,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
    • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Affordability
    A3P007: Other
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
    • District Energy plans,
    • SECAP Updates
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
    • City Vision 2050,
    • SECAP Updates,
    • Building / district Certification
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
    • District Energy plans
    A3P008: Other
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Low Emission Zone,
    • Pollutants Reduction
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Low Emission Zone,
    • Net zero carbon footprint,
    • Life Cycle approach,
    • Pollutants Reduction,
    • Greening strategies
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Net zero carbon footprint,
    • Carbon-free
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Low Emission Zone
    • Energy Neutral
    A3P009: OtherEnergy Positive, Low Emission Zone
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsPEDs in Italy are meant as strategies towards climate-neutrality: at national/regional/local level a specific legislation on PEDs development is not yet available. However, the European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (‘Renewable energy’ directive - 2018/2001/EU and ‘Common rules for the internal electricity market’ directive- 2019/944/EU). Italy, starting from 2020, has transposed the Directives at national level (‘Milleproroghe’ decree then made effective by ‘Promotion of Renewable sources’ decree 199/2021). At regional level Emilia Romagna in May 2022 developed a law encouraging EC model diffusion (LR 5/2022 ‘Promotion and support of renewable energy communities and renewable energy self-consumers acting collectively’). Energy Community, according to Lindholm et al. 2021, can be considered as ‘a first implementation step towards PEDs.’
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionThe pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED).Pilastro-Roveri district can be considered as a PED-relevant area. Even though at the moment the area doesn’t meet annual energy positive balance, it addresses some relevant key aspects listed in the JPI UE PED Framework Definition such as: - high level of aspiration in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production; - integration of different systems and infrastructures; - inclusion of aspects not only related to energy sector, but also connected with social, economic and environmental sustainability.Çamlık District, unlike many other districts in Ankara, has a specific urban morphology that draws near the other pilot zones considered by the partners of PED-ACT. The site has three-storey single housing units, along with a fair amount of greenery around. Furthermore, the roof areas enable large amounts of PV installment, which results in higher amounts of local renewable energy potential. Therefore, the district is a good fit for PED development.
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentPilastro-Roveri district is not actually meant to become a PEDs. However, it can be considered as a PED-relevant case-study since a participatory transition pathway towards a more sustainable, efficient and resilient district is gaining ground, involving the main urban stakeholders. At the same time, the most recent city plan and policies (such as the city SECAPs - updated in 2021) are promoting PED model as a key strategy to guide Bologna towards climate neutrality by 2030.PED-ACT project.
    B1P003: Environment of the case study area
    B2P003: Environment of the case study areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban areaSuburban areaSuburban areaUrban area
    B1P004: Type of district
    B2P004: Type of district
    • Renovation
    • Renovation
    • Renovation
    • New construction
    • Renovation
    • New construction,
    • Renovation
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Retrofitting Area
    • New Development
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Re-use / Transformation Area,
    • New Development
    B1P006: Year of construction
    B1P006: Year of construction20051986
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
    B1P011: Population density before intervention
    B1P011: Population density before intervention0000000
    B1P012: Population density after intervention
    B1P012: Population density after intervention0000000
    B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
    B1P013: Residentialnoyesyesyesnoyesno
    B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]10279550800
    B1P013: Officenonoyesnononono
    B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Industry and Utilitynonoyesnononono
    B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Commercialnonoyesnononono
    B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Institutionalnonoyesnononono
    B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Natural areasnonoyesnononono
    B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Recreationalnonoyesnononono
    B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Dismissed areasnonoyesnononono
    B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Othernonononononono
    B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
    B1P014: Residentialnoyesyesyesyesyesno
    B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]10279510000050800
    B1P014: Officenonoyesnononono
    B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonoyesnononono
    B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Commercialnonoyesnononono
    B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Institutionalnonoyesnoyesnono
    B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]2000
    B1P014: Natural areasnonoyesnononono
    B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Recreationalnonoyesnononono
    B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Dismissed areasnonoyesnononono
    B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Othernonononononono
    B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
    B2P002: Installation life time
    B2P002: Installation life time
    B2P003: Scale of action
    B2P003: ScaleDistrictDistrict
    B2P004: Operator of the installation
    B2P004: Operator of the installation
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
    B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
    B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?
    B2P006: Other
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    B2P007: Other
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
    B2P008: Other
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    • Academia,
    • Private
    B2P009: Other
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    B2P011: Other
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P017: Capacities
    B2P017: Capacities
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P020: External accessibility
    B2P020: External accessibility
    C1P001: Unlocking Factors
    C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
    C1P002: Driving Factors
    C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
    C1P003: Administrative barriers
    C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Lack of public participation3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
    C1P004: Policy barriers
    C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
    C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
    C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Non-effective regulations4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
    C1P006: Environmental barriers
    C1P006: Environmental barriers- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 - Water Scarcity: 1- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Water Scarcity: 1 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1
    C1P007: Technical barriers
    C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Deficient planning3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Lack of well-defined process4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
    C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
    C1P008: Inertia4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Rebound effect4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
    C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
    C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
    C1P010: Financial barriers
    C1P010: Hidden costs4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Economic crisis5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Risk and uncertainty4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
    C1P011: Market barriers
    C1P011: Split incentives5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Energy price distortion5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
    C1P012: Stakeholders involved
    C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    C1P012: Research & Innovation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    C1P012: Financial/Funding
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Business process management
    • None
    C1P012: Urban Services providers
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    C1P012: Real Estate developers
    • None
    C1P012: Design/Construction companies
    • Construction/implementation
    C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Other
    C1P012: Other (if any)
    Summary

    Authors (framework concept)

    Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

    Contributors (to the content)

    Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

    Implemented by

    Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
    Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

    Join the Action

    PED-EU-NET is an open, interdisciplinary and growing network welcoming academics, practitioners and relevant stakeholders to contribute to the activities of the work plan.
    Join Now

    COST

    COST is an EU funding programme that enables researchers to set up their interdisciplinary research networks in Europe and beyond. We provide funds for organising conferences, meetings, training schools, short scientific exchanges or other networking activities in a wide range of scientific topics. By creating open spaces where people and ideas can grow, we unlock the full potential of science.

    PED-EU-NET

    The COST Action Positive Energy Districts European Network (PED-EU-NET) aims to mobilise researchers and other relevant stakeholders across different domains and sectors to drive the deployment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Europe through open sharing of knowledge, exchange of ideas, pooling of resources, experimentation of new methods and co-creation of novel solutions.

    Action Details

    Grant Holder
    Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome

    Start of Action: 10 September 2020
    End of Action: 09 September 2024
    CSO approval date: 24/03/2020

    © 2021-2023 PED-EU-NET COST Action CA19126. All rights reserved.