Search
Close this search box.
Search
Map View
Table View
Projects
Filters:
Clear Filters Export All Entries (CSV)
NameProjectTypeCompare
Örebro-Vivalla JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Texel JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hällefors, Sweden JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Uncompare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Uncompare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study
TitleKifissia, Energy community
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus
«×»
Ankara, Çamlık District
«×»
Zaragoza, Actur
«×»
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal
«×»
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka
«×»
City of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block
«×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabKifissia, Energy communityIstanbul, Ozyegin University CampusAnkara, Çamlık DistrictZaragoza, ActurInnsbruck, Campagne-ArealIzmir, District of KarşıyakaCity of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynonoyesnonoyesyes
PED relevant case studyyesyesyesyesyesnono
PED Lab.nonononononono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralitynoyesyesyesyesyesno
Annual energy surplusnonoyesyesnoyesno
Energy communityyesnoyesnononono
Circularitynonononononono
Air quality and urban comfortyesyesnononoyesno
Electrificationyesyesyesyesnonono
Net-zero energy costnonoyesnonoyesno
Net-zero emissionnonoyesyesyesnono
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nonononononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynonoyesnonoyesyes
Othernoyesnonononono
Other (A1P004)almost nZEB district
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabPlanning PhaseImplementation PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhaseCompletedPlanning PhaseIn operation
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date10/2410/2201/2304/1610/2206/18
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date10/2809/2504/2210/2503/22
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • General statistical datasets
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • General statistical datasets
A1P009: OtherOther
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
      • M. Hukkalainen, F. Zarrin, K. Klobut, O. Lindholm, M. Ranta, P. Hajduk, T. Vainio-Kaila, E. Wanne, J. Tartia, H. Horn, K. Kontu, J. Juhmen, S. Santala, R. Turtiainen, J. Töyräs, T. Koljonen. (2020). Deliverable D3.1 Detailed plan of the Espoo smart city lighthouse demonstrations. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2020-09/SPARCS_D3.1_Detailed_plan_Espoo.pdf,
      • Hukkalainen, Zarrin Fatima, Krzysztof Klobut, Kalevi Piira, Mikaela Ranta, Petr Hajduk, Tiina Vainio-Kaila , Elina Wanne, Jani Tartia, Angela Bartel, Joni Mäkinen, Mia Kaurila, Kaisa Kontu, Jaano Juhmen, Merja Ryöppy, Reetta Turtiainen, Joona Töyräs, Timo Koljonen (2021) Deliverable 3.2 Midterm report on the implemented demonstrations of solutions for energy positive blocks in Espoo. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2022-02/SPARCS_D3.2.pdf,
      • www.lippulaiva.fi
      A1P011: Geographic coordinates
      X Coordinate (longitude):23.81458829.25830032.795369-0.889111.42434673814025627.11004924.6543
      Y Coordinate (latitude):38.07734941.03060039.88181241.648847.27147078672910438.49605460.1491
      A1P012: Country
      A1P012: CountryGreeceTurkeyTurkeySpainAustriaTurkeyFinland
      A1P013: City
      A1P013: CityMunicipality of KifissiaIstanbulAnkaraZaragozaInnsbruckİzmirEspoo
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CsaCfaDsbBSkDfbCsaDfb
      A1P015: District boundary
      A1P015: District boundaryVirtualGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographic
      OtherThe energy will be produced by a PV plant installed on the terrace of a municipal building. Members of the energy community (that is under formation) will benefit from the energy produced via virtual net metering. PV instalment and the buildings (owned by the members of the community) will be within the boundaries of the Municipality but not necessary in the same area/district/neighbourhood
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:PrivatePrivatePublicMixedPrivatePrivate
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Single OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle Owner
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED1525764219
      A1P019: Conditioned space
      A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]2260022277102795112000
      A1P020: Total ground area
      A1P020: Total ground area [m²]285.400508001135132600165000
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0000231
      A1P022: Financial schemes
      A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estatenoyesnonononoyes
      A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
      A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernonononononono
      A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononononono
      A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnonononononono
      A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonononononono
      A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnonononononono
      A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononono
      A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnoyesyesnonoyesyes
      A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]1193355308875
      A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonoyesnoyesyesno
      A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonononononono
      A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononono
      A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022: Other
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production,
      • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      • Job creation,
      • Other
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      • Job creation,
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local businesses
      A1P023: OtherCreate affordable appartments for the citizens
      A1P024: More comments:
      A1P024: More comments:In addition to having the most energy efficient academic building in Turkey, the university campus also has 3 buildings with LEED NC Campus certificate and LEED BD+C Gold certificate. In addition, it aims to continuously improve the energy efficiency objectives on campus in an innovative way. For this purpose, energy management and storage systems are being installed in the Dormitory 6 building, which is used as the demo area of the LEGOFIT project, for the purpose of turning it into a PED project.The urban morphology of Çamlık District differs in several ways, compared with the typical urban fabric in Türkiye, along with the capital city of Ankara. The houses on the site are composed of three-story attached single-housing units with multiple rows, creating a total of 257 housing units in total. Low-rise buildings coupled with suitably oriented rooftop surfaces brings about significant advantages in the site. Dense greenery in the site also results in reduced cooling energy demand in the buildings.Owners are two local social housing companies. The complete district will consist 4 building blocks, from which only the first one with 4 building is ready built and occupied. At the end, it would be a district of ca. 1100 flats in 16 buildings with 78000 m2The Espoonlahti district is located on the south-western coast of Espoo. With 56,000 inhabitants, it is the second largest of the Espoo city centres. The number of inhabitants is estimated to grow to 70,000 within the next 10 years. Espoonlahti will be a future transit hub of the south-western Espoo, along the metro line, and the increasing stream of passengers provides a huge potential for retail, business and residential developments. E-mobility solutions and last-mile services have strong potential in the area when subway extension is finished and running. The extensive (re)development of the Lippulaiva blocks make a benchmark catering to the everyday needs of residents. The completely new shopping centre is a state-of-the-art cross point with 20,000 daily customers and 10,000 daily commuters (3.5 million/year). The new underground metro line and station, and feeder line bus terminal, are fully integrated. Residential housing of approximately 550 new apartments will be built on top. Lippulaiva is a large traffic hub, directly connected to public transport and right next to the Länsiväylä highway and extensive cycle paths. Lippulaiva offers diverse, mixed-use services, such as a shopping mall, public services, a day care centre, residential apartment buildings, and underground parking facilities. Lippulaiva received the LEED Gold environmental certificate and Smart Building Gold certificate. • Flagship of sustainability • Cooling and heating demand from geothermal energy system (on-site) with energy storage system, 4 MW • PV panels: roof and façade, 630 kWp • Smart control strategies for electricity and thermal energy, smart microgrid-system and battery storage • Charging capacity for 134 EVs
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]1
      Contact person for general enquiries
      A1P026: NameArtemis Giavasoglou, Kleopatra KalampokaCem KeskinProf. Dr. İpek Gürsel DİNOClara LorenteGeorgios DermentzisOzlem SenyolElina Ekelund
      A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of Kifissia – SPARCS local teamCenter for Energy, Environment and Economy, Ozyegin UniversityMiddle East Technical UniversityCIRCEUniversity of InnsbruckKarsiyaka MunicipalityCitycon Oyj
      A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public BodiesSME / Industry
      A1P028: Other
      A1P029: Emailgiavasoglou@kifissia.grcem.keskin@ozyegin.edu.tripekg@metu.edu.trCLORENTEM@FCIRCE.COMGeorgios.Dermentzis@uibk.ac.atozlemkocaer2@gmail.comElina.ekelund@citycon.com
      Contact person for other special topics
      A1P030: NameStavros Zapantis - vice mayorM. Pınar MengüçAssoc. Prof. Onur TaylanHasan Burak CavkaElina Ekelund
      A1P031: Emailstavros.zapantis@gmail.compinar.menguc@ozyegin.edu.trotaylan@metu.edu.trhasancavka@iyte.edu.trElina.ekelund@citycon.com
      Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYes
      A2P001: Fields of application
      A2P001: Fields of application
      • Energy production
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies,
      • Waste management,
      • Indoor air quality,
      • Construction materials
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy production,
      • Construction materials
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Construction materials
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy production,
      • Indoor air quality
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.)
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies
      A2P001: Other
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsLEED NC Campus + LEGOFIT Project Energy Efficiency: Tri- generation, Compliance with ISO 50001, ASHRAE 90.1, energy efficient appliances, HVAC and lighting Energy flexibility: Energy demand management Energy production: Solar PVs Onsite + (to be installed more) E-mobility: EV Charging stations Indoor Air Quality: Energy Management System, Compliance with ASHRAE 62.1, ASHRAE 55 Construction materials: Passive systems, LEED certified buildings, innovative materials such as PCM Waste Management: Zero waste documentThe energy consumption and efficiency of the energy model of Çamlık Site, created using EnergyPlus software, have been evaluated under the scenarios specified below. At each stage, a new system was incorporated to explore the potential of the area becoming a PED. In this context, four scenarios were created to compare different energy scenarios for the Ankara pilot area and to observe the impact of the included systems on energy efficiency: V_base; V_ER; V_ER,HP; V_ER,HP,PV. The basic scenario (V_base) was created using the current state without any improvement to the building envelope. This scenario was developed to determine the annual energy needs of the entire site without any intervention and serves as a reference point for the other developed models. The second scenario (V_ER) was created to improve the building envelopes of all residential units in the area, altering the U-values according to Türkiye's current building standards (TS-825). The third scenario (V_ER,HP) primarily includes a heat pump model that can use electrical energy to produce higher thermal energy and is added on top of the improvements in the second scenario. Finally, the V_ER,HP,PV scenario combines building envelope improvements, the heat pump, and the solar PV system.The buildings are designed based on Passive House standards and dynamic building and system simulations are performed to optimise the HVAC systems, that are a ground-water heat pump for space heating and district heating for domestic hot water preparation. Photovoltaic systems are installed in the available roof spaces, however, more renewable sources are required due to very large number of apartments (very high density) to reach PED, and thus, simulation studies are performed.Methods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4). In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED.Energy efficiency: - eliminating waste energy utilizing smart energy system - utilizing excess heat from grocery stores Energy flexibility: - A battery energy storage system (1,5 MW/1,5MWh); Active participation in Nordpool electricity market (FCR-N) Energy production: - heating and cooling from geothermal heat pump system; 171 energy wells (over 51 km); heat capacity 4 MW - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Estimation of annual production is about 540 MWh (630 kWp) E-mobility - Installation of charging stations for electric vehicles (for 134 EVs) - e-bike services (warm storage room, charging cabinets for e-bikes) Digital technologies: - Building Analytics system by Schneider Electric
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000YesYesNoYesYes
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceYesYesYesYesYes
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNoNoNo
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationNot included, the campus is a non car area except emergenciesMobility is not included in the calculations.Mobility is not included in the calculations.Mobility is not included in the energy model.
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]3.4460.393.8625.5
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.5280.6551.2265.8
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]0
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P011: PVyesyesyesnoyesyesyes
      A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]3.42400.421.0280.54
      A2P011: Windnonononononono
      A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Hydrononononononono
      A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_elnonononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: PVT_elnonononononono
      A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Othernonononononono
      A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P012: Geothermalnonononononoyes
      A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]5
      A2P012: Solar Thermalnonononononono
      A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_heatnonononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
      A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: PVT_thnonononononono
      A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Othernonononononono
      A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
      A2P014: Annual energy use
      A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]3.53.9760.965.08811.3
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]-25.76
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
      A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P017: Gasnonoyesnonoyesno
      A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
      A2P017: Coalnonononononono
      A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
      A2P017: Oilnonononononono
      A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
      A2P017: Othernonononononono
      A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P018: PVnoyesnononoyesno
      A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.000455470.707
      A2P018: Windnonononononono
      A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Hydrononononononono
      A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_elnonononononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
      A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Othernonononononoyes
      A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]5.26
      A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
      A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
      A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_heatnonononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
      A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
      A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Othernonononononono
      A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary000001.45403111739751.0532319391635
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]0
      A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
      A2P022: Safety & Security
      A2P022: Healthindoor air quility (indoor CO2 concentration) - measured on the extract air of the mechanical ventilation system. Relative humidity to avoid mold.
      A2P022: Education
      A2P022: Mobility
      A2P022: EnergySpace heating demand, thermal energy delivered by district heating, electricity of the heat pump, thermal losses of the pipes, and PV production.On-site energy ratio
      A2P022: Water
      A2P022: Economic development
      A2P022: Housing and Community
      A2P022: Waste
      A2P022: Other
      A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
      A2P023: Photovoltaicsnoyesyesyesyesyesyes
      A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnonononononono
      A2P023: Wind Turbinesnoyesnonononono
      A2P023: Geothermal energy systemnononoyesnonoyes
      A2P023: Waste heat recoverynonononononoyes
      A2P023: Waste to energynonononononono
      A2P023: Polygenerationnonononononono
      A2P023: Co-generationnoyesnonononono
      A2P023: Heat Pumpnoyesyesyesyesyesno
      A2P023: Hydrogennonononononono
      A2P023: Hydropower plantnonononononono
      A2P023: Biomassnonononononono
      A2P023: Biogasnonononononono
      A2P023: Other
      A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
      A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)noyesnonononoyes
      A2P024: Energy management systemnoyesnoyesnonoyes
      A2P024: Demand-side managementnoyesnonononono
      A2P024: Smart electricity gridnonononononoyes
      A2P024: Thermal Storagenonononoyesnoyes
      A2P024: Electric Storagenoyesnonononoyes
      A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnoyesnonoyesnono
      A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnoyesnonononono
      A2P024: P2P – buildingsnonononoyesnono
      A2P024: Other
      A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
      A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnonoyesnonoyesno
      A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnonononononono
      A2P025: High-performance new buildingsnoyesnonoyesnoyes
      A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)nonononononoyes
      A2P025: Urban data platformsnonononononono
      A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnonononononono
      A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)noyesyesnoyesyesyes
      A2P025: Smart irrigationnoyesnonononono
      A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonononononono
      A2P025: Smart surveillancenoyesnonononono
      A2P025: Other
      A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
      A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nonononononono
      A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)nonononononoyes
      A2P026: e-Mobilitynoyesnoyesnonoyes
      A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnoyesnonononono
      A2P026: Car-free areanoyesnonononono
      A2P026: OtherLocal transportation hub with direct connection to metro & bus terminal; parking spaces for 1,400 bicycles and for 1,300 cars Promoting e-Mobility: 134 charging stations, A technical reservation for expanding EV charging system 1400 bicycle racks and charging cabinets for 10 e-bicycle batteries
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesNoYesYesNoYes
      A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance Certificate - in Greece it is mandatory in order to buy or rent a house or a dwellingTwo buildings are certified "Passive House new build"Energy Performance Certificate => Energy efficiency class B (2018 version)
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesYesNoNoNoYes
      A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesLEED BD+C, LEED NC CAMPUSLEED (Core & Shell, v4) GOLD certification, Smart Building certification (GOLD)
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC)
      • Smart cities strategies,
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
      • Smart cities strategies
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • New development strategies,
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyKarşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030. System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023.Relevant city strategies behind PED development in Espoo include the following: - The Espoo Story: Sustainability is heavily included within the values and goals of the current Espoo city strategy, also known as the Espoo Story, running from 2021 to 2025. For example, the strategy names being a responsible pioneer as one of the main values of the city and has chosen achieving carbon neutrality by 2030 as one of the main goals of the current council term. In addition to the Espoo story, four cross-administrative development programmes act as cooperation platforms that allow the city, together with its partners, to develop innovative solutions through experiments and pilot projects in line with the Espoo Story. The Sustainable Espoo development programme is one of the four programmes, thus putting sustainability on the forefront in city development work. - EU Mission: 100 climate-neutral and smart cities by 2030: Cities selected for the Mission commit to achieving carbon-neutrality in 2030. A key tool in the Mission is the Climate City Contract. Each selected city will prepare and implement its contracts in collaboration with local businesses as well as other stakeholders and residents. - Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy: Espoo is committed to the Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy, under which the signatories commit to supporting the European Union’s 40% greenhouse gas emission reduction goal by 2030. The Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP) is a key instrument for implementing the agreement. The Action Plan outlines the key measures the city will take to achieve its carbon neutrality goal. The plan also includes a mapping of climate change risks and vulnerabilities, adaptation measures, emission calculations, emission reduction scenarios and impact estimations of measures. The SECAP of the City of Espoo is available here (only available in Finnish). - UN Sustainable development Goals: The city of Espoo has committed to becoming a forerunner and achieving the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) by 2025. The goal is to make Espoo financially, ecologically, socially, and culturally sustainable. - The Circular Cities Declaration: At the end of 2020, Espoo signed the Europe-wide circular economy commitment Circular Cities Declaration. The ten goals of the declaration promote the implementation of the city’s circular economy. - Espoo Clean Heat: Fortum and the City of Espoo are committed to producing carbon-neutral district heating in the network operating in the areas of Espoo, Kauniainen and Kirkkonummi during the 2020s. The district heating network provides heating to some 250,000 end-users in homes and offices. Coal will be completely abandoned in the production of district heating by 2025. The main targets related to PED development included in the noted city strategies are the following: - Espoo will achieve carbon neutrality by 2030. To be precise, this carbon neutrality goal is defined as an 80% emission reduction from the 1990 level by the year 2030. The remaining 20% share can be absorbed in carbon sinks or compensated by other means. - District heating in Espoo will be carbon-neutral by 2029, and coal-based production will be phased out from district heating by 2025. - Espoo aims to end the use of fossil fuels in the heating of city-owned buildings by 2025. - Quantitative goals within the Espoo SECAP report: - Espoo aims to reduce total energy consumption within the municipal sector by 7.5% by the end of 2025 in comparison to the 2015 level. The social housing company Espoon Asunnot OY aims to meet the same target. - Espoo aims to cover 10% of the energy consumption of new buildings via on-site production. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of cycling to 15% by 2024. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of public transport by 1.1% yearly. - Espoo aims to reduce the emissions of bus transport by 90% by the end of 2025, when compared to 2010 levels.
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
      • Electrification of Cooking Methods
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
      • Other
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
      A3P003: OtherBoiler Automation, Energy Management System, Electric Battery Storage, Demand Management and Flexible PricingDistrict heating based mainly on heat pumps and renewable sources
      A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
      A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesCarbon and Energy NeutralityAccording to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary with heat pumps. Rooftop photovoltaic panels also have the potential for renewable energy generation. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity through this scenario.The priority was to eliminate the CO2 emissions by optimizing the building envelope and the heating systems.According to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario.- Citycon (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) aims to be carbon neutral in its energy use by 2030 - Lippulaiva is a unique urban centre with state-of-the-art energy concept. The centre has a smart managing system, which allows for example the temporary reduction of power used in air conditioning and charging stations when energy consumption is at its peak. In addition, a backup generator and a large electric battery will balance the operation of the electricity network. - Lippulaiva is also an important mobility hub for the people of Espoo. Espoonlahti metro station is located under the centre, and the West Metro started to operate to Espoonlahti in December 2022. Lippulaiva also has a bus terminal, which serves the metro’s feeder traffic in the Espoonlahti major district.
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviourUnder LEGOFIT project, promoting sustainable behavior for better occupant experience is a targeted aim under a work package.For Citycon, it was important to engage local people within the Lippulaiva project. During the construction period as well as after opening of the shopping center, citizens have been engaged in multiple ways, such as informing local citizens of the progress of construction, engaging young people in the design processes of the shopping centre and long-term commitment of youngsters with Lippulaiva Buddy class initiative. Users’ engagement activities are conducted in close co-operation with SPARCS partners.
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      • Innovative business models
      A3P006: Other
      A3P007: Social models
      A3P007: Social models
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Affordability
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Social incentives,
      • Affordability,
      • Prevention of energy poverty,
      • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Affordability
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
      A3P007: Other
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      • City Vision 2050,
      • SECAP Updates,
      • Building / district Certification
      • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
      • District Energy plans
      • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
      • District Energy plans,
      • SECAP Updates
      • Building / district Certification
      A3P008: Other
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Net zero carbon footprint,
      • Greening strategies,
      • Cool Materials
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Pollutants Reduction
      • Other
      A3P009: OtherEnergy Positive, Low Emission ZoneCarbon free in terms of energy
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsISO 45001, ISO 14001, ISO 50001, Zero Waste Policy- Energy efficiency regulations (Directive 2006/32/EC and 2009/72/EC) - EU directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings => all new buildings should be “nearly zero-energy buildings” (nZEB) from 2021
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionThe campus should be considered a PED case study due to its exemplary commitment to sustainability and energy efficiency, as evidenced by several of its buildings achieving LEED certification. This certification underscores the campus's adherence to rigorous environmental standards and its proactive steps towards reducing carbon footprints. Also, the integration of sustainable practices across the campus aligns with the PED framework, which aims to create urban areas that produce more energy than they consume. Therefore, this campus serves as a model of how educational institutions can lead the way in fostering sustainable communities and advancing the goals of PED.Çamlık District, unlike many other districts in Ankara, has a specific urban morphology that draws near the other pilot zones considered by the partners of PED-ACT. The site has three-storey single housing units, along with a fair amount of greenery around. Furthermore, the roof areas enable large amounts of PV installment, which results in higher amounts of local renewable energy potential. Therefore, the district is a good fit for PED development.Extremely low building energy demand, the electric energy of the heat pump used for space heating is significantly lower compared to thermal energy for the domestic hot water preparation.The pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED).Lippulaiva is a project with high level goal in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production.
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentThe purpose of implementing the PED project on this sustainable campus, where several buildings have LEED certification, is to further enhance its energy efficiency and environmental stewardship by creating a district that generates more energy than it consumes. The initiator was motivated by the need to address climate change, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and promote renewable energy sources. Additionally, the campus's existing commitment to sustainability and the success of its LEED-certified buildings provided a strong foundation for demonstrating the feasibility and benefits of PED development, serving as a model for sustainable urban living and energy self-sufficiency.PED-ACT project.Since it is an urban area, with high building and apartment density, the need for CO2 reduction is quite relevant and thus, in new built, the minimization of CO2 emissions is crucial.- Citycon’s (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) target is to be carbon neutral by 2030 - Increasing sustainability requirements from the financing, tenants, cities, other stakeholders
      B1P003: Environment of the case study area
      B2P003: Environment of the case study areaSuburban areaSuburban areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban area
      B1P004: Type of district
      B2P004: Type of district
      • Renovation
      • Renovation
      • Renovation
      • New construction
      • Renovation
      • New construction
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      • Retrofitting Area
      • Retrofitting Area
      • Retrofitting Area
      • Re-use / Transformation Area,
      • New Development
      • Retrofitting Area
      • Re-use / Transformation Area,
      • New Development
      B1P006: Year of construction
      B1P006: Year of construction20241986202220052022
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential780
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential9800
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential9800
      B1P011: Population density before intervention
      B1P011: Population density before intervention03400000
      B1P012: Population density after intervention
      B1P012: Population density after intervention034.337771548704000.06871641265086800
      B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
      B1P013: Residentialnonoyesnonoyesno
      B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]50800102795
      B1P013: Officenonononononono
      B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
      B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Commercialnonononononoyes
      B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Institutionalnoyesnonononono
      B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]285.400
      B1P013: Natural areasnonononononoyes
      B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Recreationalnonononononono
      B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Dismissed areasnonononononono
      B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Othernonononononono
      B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
      B1P014: Residentialnonoyesnoyesyesyes
      B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]50800102795
      B1P014: Officenonononononono
      B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
      B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Commercialnonononoyesnoyes
      B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Institutionalnoyesnonoyesnono
      B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]280000
      B1P014: Natural areasnonononononono
      B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Recreationalnonononoyesnono
      B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononononono
      B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Othernonononononono
      B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
      B2P002: Installation life time
      B2P002: Installation life time
      B2P003: Scale of action
      B2P003: Scale
      B2P004: Operator of the installation
      B2P004: Operator of the installation
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
      B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
      B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?
      B2P006: Other
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      B2P007: Other
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
      B2P008: Other
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      B2P009: Other
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      B2P011: Other
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      B2P016: Execution of operations
      B2P016: Execution of operations
      B2P017: Capacities
      B2P017: Capacities
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P020: External accessibility
      B2P020: External accessibility
      C1P001: Unlocking Factors
      C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
      C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
      C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
      C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
      C1P002: Driving Factors
      C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
      C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
      C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
      C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
      C1P003: Administrative barriers
      C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
      C1P003: Lack of public participation3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
      C1P004: Policy barriers
      C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
      C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
      C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
      C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
      C1P005: Non-effective regulations4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
      C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
      C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important
      C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
      C1P006: Environmental barriers
      C1P006: Environmental barriersAir Quality Management Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Energy Efficiency Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Water Conservation Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Waste Management Importance Level: 4 (Important) Material Selection Importance Level: 4 (Important) Renewable Energy Integration Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Heat Island Effect Mitigation Importance Level: 4 (Important) Noise Pollution Control Importance Level: 3 (Moderately Important)- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Water Scarcity: 1 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1Urban area very high buildings (and apartment) density and thus, less available space for renewable sources.- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 - Water Scarcity: 1
      C1P007: Technical barriers
      C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P007: Deficient planning3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P007: Lack of well-defined process4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
      C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
      C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
      C1P008: Inertia4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
      C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Rebound effect4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
      C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
      C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
      C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
      C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
      C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
      C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
      C1P010: Financial barriers
      C1P010: Hidden costs4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important
      C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
      C1P010: Economic crisis4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P010: Risk and uncertainty5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
      C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
      C1P011: Market barriers
      C1P011: Split incentives5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
      C1P011: Energy price distortion5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
      C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
      C1P012: Stakeholders involved
      C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: Research & Innovation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      C1P012: Financial/Funding
      • Planning/leading,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Construction/implementation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Business process management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: Urban Services providers
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Construction/implementation
      • None
      C1P012: Real Estate developers
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Design/Construction companies
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Other
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Other (if any)
      Summary

      Authors (framework concept)

      Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

      Contributors (to the content)

      Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

      Implemented by

      Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
      Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

      Join the Action

      PED-EU-NET is an open, interdisciplinary and growing network welcoming academics, practitioners and relevant stakeholders to contribute to the activities of the work plan.
      Join Now

      COST

      COST is an EU funding programme that enables researchers to set up their interdisciplinary research networks in Europe and beyond. We provide funds for organising conferences, meetings, training schools, short scientific exchanges or other networking activities in a wide range of scientific topics. By creating open spaces where people and ideas can grow, we unlock the full potential of science.

      PED-EU-NET

      The COST Action Positive Energy Districts European Network (PED-EU-NET) aims to mobilise researchers and other relevant stakeholders across different domains and sectors to drive the deployment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Europe through open sharing of knowledge, exchange of ideas, pooling of resources, experimentation of new methods and co-creation of novel solutions.

      Action Details

      Grant Holder
      Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome

      Start of Action: 10 September 2020
      End of Action: 09 September 2024
      CSO approval date: 24/03/2020

      © 2021-2023 PED-EU-NET COST Action CA19126. All rights reserved.