| Name | Project | Type | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|
| Romania, Alba Iulia PED | ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Romania, Alba Iulia PED | InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Munich, Harthof district | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Lublin | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran | CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Bærum, Eiksveien 116 | CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Findhorn, the Park | InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED | ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Umeå, Ålidhem district | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Aalborg East | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
| Ankara, Çamlık District | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Trenčín | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Luxembourg, Betzdorf | LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Vantaa, Aviapolis | NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Vidin, Himik and Bononia | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Oslo, Verksbyen | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Uden, Loopkantstraat | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Zaragoza, Actur | NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Aarhus, Brabrand | BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city | ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Izmir, District of Karşıyaka | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study | Uncompare |
| Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus | LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Espoo, Kera | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
| Freiburg, Waldsee | PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district | PED Case Study | Uncompare |
| Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Graz, Reininghausgründe | PED Case Study | Uncompare | |
| Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
| Oulu, Kaukovainio | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Halmstad, Fyllinge | PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare | |
| Lund, Brunnshög district | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Vienna, Am Kempelenpark | PED Case Study | Uncompare | |
| Évora, Portugal | POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Groningen, PED South | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Lab | Uncompare |
| Groningen, PED North | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Lab | Compare |
| Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Lab | Uncompare |
| Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT | PED Lab | Compare | |
| Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district | STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
| Leon, Former Sugar Factory district | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Uncompare |
| Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Salzburg, Gneis district | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Tartu, City centre area | SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district | GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab | PED Lab | Uncompare | |
| Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Uncompare |
| Kifissia, Energy community | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Relevant Case Study |
| Title | Kifissia, Energy community | Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing | Leon, Former Sugar Factory district | Groningen, PED South | Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district | Halmstad, Fyllinge | Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district | Freiburg, Waldsee | Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab | Vienna, Am Kempelenpark | Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad | Izmir, District of Karşıyaka | Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio | Graz, Reininghausgründe |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||||||||||
| A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab | Kifissia, Energy community | Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing | Leon, Former Sugar Factory district | Groningen, PED South | Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district | Halmstad, Fyllinge | Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district | Freiburg, Waldsee | Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab | Vienna, Am Kempelenpark | Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad | Izmir, District of Karşıyaka | Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio | Graz, Reininghausgründe |
| A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet | ||||||||||||||
| A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site | ||||||||||||||
| PED case study | no | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | yes | no | yes | no | yes | no | yes |
| PED relevant case study | yes | no | no | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | yes | no |
| PED Lab. | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||||||||||
| Climate neutrality | no | yes | no | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| Annual energy surplus | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | no | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no |
| Energy community | yes | no | no | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | no | no | yes | no |
| Circularity | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| Air quality and urban comfort | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| Electrification | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | no | no | no | yes | no |
| Net-zero energy cost | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| Net-zero emission | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | yes | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
| Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous) | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
| Maximise self-sufficiency | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | yes | no |
| Other | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | no |
| Other (A1P004) | Net-zero emission; Annual energy surplus | Green IT | Energy-flexibility | |||||||||||
| A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||||||||||
| A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED Lab | Planning Phase | Planning Phase | Planning Phase | Implementation Phase | Implementation Phase | Planning Phase | Completed | Planning Phase | In operation | Planning Phase | In operation | Planning Phase | Planning Phase | Implementation Phase |
| A1P006: Start Date | ||||||||||||||
| A1P006: Start date | 10/21 | 12/18 | 12/18 | 01/21 | 04/14 | 11/21 | 01/2011 | 07/16 | 01/13 | 10/22 | 2019 | |||
| A1P007: End Date | ||||||||||||||
| A1P007: End date | 10/24 | 12/23 | 12/23 | 01/30 | 10/23 | 11/24 | 02/2013 | 02/25 | 12/24 | 10/25 | 2025 | |||
| A1P008: Reference Project | ||||||||||||||
| A1P008: Reference Project | ||||||||||||||
| A1P009: Data availability | ||||||||||||||
| A1P009: Data availability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| A1P009: Other | Other | |||||||||||||
| A1P010: Sources | ||||||||||||||
| Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| A1P011: Geographic coordinates | ||||||||||||||
| X Coordinate (longitude): | 23.814588 | -8.373557 | -5.584795 | 6.590655 | 12.318458 | 12.92054 | 23.798083 | 7.885857135842917 | 2.1 | 16.395292 | 11.078770773531746 | 27.110049 | 15.394495 | 15.407440 |
| Y Coordinate (latitude): | 38.077349 | 41.135804 | 42.593391 | 53.204087 | 51.326492 | 56.65194 | 61.464088 | 47.986535207080045 | 41.3 | 48.173598 | 61.42604420399112 | 38.496054 | 60.486609 | 47.0607 |
| A1P012: Country | ||||||||||||||
| A1P012: Country | Greece | Portugal | Spain | Netherlands | Germany | Sweden | Finland | Germany | Spain | Austria | Norway | Turkey | Sweden | Austria |
| A1P013: City | ||||||||||||||
| A1P013: City | Municipality of Kifissia | Maia | Leon | Groningen | Leipzig | Halmstad | Tampere | Freiburg im Breisgau | Barcelona and Tarragona | Vienna | Evenstad, Stor-Elvdal municipality | İzmir | Borlänge | Graz |
| A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification) | ||||||||||||||
| A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification). | Csa | Csb | Csb | Cfa | Dfb | Dwb | Dfb | Cfb | Csa | Cwb | Dwc | Csa | Dsb | Dfb |
| A1P015: District boundary | ||||||||||||||
| A1P015: District boundary | Virtual | Virtual | Geographic | Functional | Functional | Geographic | Virtual | Virtual | Virtual | Geographic | Geographic | Geographic | Geographic | Geographic |
| Other | The energy will be produced by a PV plant installed on the terrace of a municipal building. Members of the energy community (that is under formation) will benefit from the energy produced via virtual net metering. PV instalment and the buildings (owned by the members of the community) will be within the boundaries of the Municipality but not necessary in the same area/district/neighbourhood | Geographic | ||||||||||||
| A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab | ||||||||||||||
| A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab: | Public | Mixed | Mixed | Mixed | Mixed | Mixed | Public | Private | Public | Private | Mixed | Mixed | ||
| A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure | ||||||||||||||
| A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure: | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | Single Owner | Single Owner | Single Owner | Multiple Owners | Single Owner | Multiple Owners | ||
| A1P018: Number of buildings in PED | ||||||||||||||
| A1P018: Number of buildings in PED | 22 | 21 | 4 | 2 | 250 | 6 | 2941 | 0 | 6 | 22 | 21 | 10 | 100 | |
| A1P019: Conditioned space | ||||||||||||||
| A1P019: Conditioned space [m²] | 16.06900 | 7.86 | 17000 | 9.000 | 284070 | 10000 | 102795 | 3700 | ||||||
| A1P020: Total ground area | ||||||||||||||
| A1P020: Total ground area [m²] | 73.14569 | 45.093 | 30000 | 25.000 | 4920000 | 32600 | 9945 | 1000000 | ||||||
| A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area | ||||||||||||||
| A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| A1P022: Financial schemes | ||||||||||||||
| A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estate | no | no | no | yes | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||||||||||
| A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO scheme | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||||||||||
| A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Other | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||||||||||
| A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural funding | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||||||||||
| A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National funding | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes |
| A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||||||||||
| A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional funding | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||||||||||
| A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal funding | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||||||||||
| A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Other | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||||||||||
| A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EU | no | yes | no | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | 1193355 | |||||||||||||
| A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - National | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | yes | no | no |
| A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||||||||||
| A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regional | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||||||||||
| A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Other | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||||||||||
| A1P022: Other | ||||||||||||||
| A1P023: Economic Targets | ||||||||||||||
| A1P023: Economic Targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| A1P023: Other | Sustainable and replicable business models regarding renewable energy systems | |||||||||||||
| A1P024: More comments: | ||||||||||||||
| A1P024: More comments: | Semi-Virtual Energy Integration Laboratory (SEILAB) The Energy Smart Lab is an infrastructure conceived as a flexible and versatile platform for innovative technological developments for both industry and competitive R+D projects. The areas of expertise of this laboratory pivot around the following technologies: – Power Electronics for the integration and control of the elements within a building or community: Renewable Energy Sources (RES), Energy Storage Systems and Electric Vehicles (EV) – ICT Platform for smart communications and energy management of systems, building, networks and communities. – Energy System Integration technologies for smart and flexible buildings and grids including RES and EV. The laboratory operation is based on the hardware emulation approach, which allows for real physical equipment to be operated under a broad range of scenarios without depending on the real occurrence of the boundary conditions suitable for the experimental validation. The laboratory is pioneer in addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation. | The “Reininghausgründe” are a new quarter near the centre of the City of Graz. In the area of a former brewery, close to more, still working industries, a new town centre is being established. It will include living areas, workplaces, shops, schools and a park, so that the need for individual mobility is minimized. It is connected to the city centre by bike paths, busses and a tram. Car sharing is provided as well. Some key-energy aspects: • characteristic 1: For the heat supply in the innovative Reininghaus energy model, low-temperature waste heat from a nearby steel plant is harnessed through the use of heat pumps. • characteristic 2: The district heating system operates at low temperatures. • characteristic 3: Generated heat that is not used immediately is stored in the power tower and supplied on demand. Other important aspects of the project are the following: • characteristic 1: Most houses are low-energy houses, some of the certified with the “Klima Aktiv” label • characteristic 2: There are extremely few parking possibilities for residents and visitors; this will foster the use of public transport and bikes • characteristic 3: All the necessary infrastructure for the “daily need” can be reached within walking distance The area of the project is going to be very “green” when finished. Featuring a big district parc, lots of other green spaces are in planning. | ||||||||||||
| A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs | ||||||||||||||
| A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR] | ||||||||||||||
| Contact person for general enquiries | ||||||||||||||
| A1P026: Name | Artemis Giavasoglou, Kleopatra Kalampoka | Adelina Rodrigues | Begoña Gonzalo Orden | Jasper Tonen, Elisabeth Koops | Simon Baum | Markus Olofsgård | Senior Scientist Terttu Vainio | Dr. Annette Steingrube | Dr. Jaume Salom, Dra. Cristina Corchero | Gerhard Hofer | Åse Lekang Sørensen | Ozlem Senyol | Jingchun Shen | Katharina Schwarz |
| A1P027: Organization | Municipality of Kifissia – SPARCS local team | Maia Municipality (CM Maia) – Energy and Mobility division | Municipality of Leon | Municipality of Groningen | CENERO Energy GmbH | AFRY | VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland | Fraunhofer Institute for solar energy systems | IREC | e7 energy innovation & engineering | SINTEF / The Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods (ZEN) in Smart Cities | Karsiyaka Municipality | Högskolan Dalarna | StadtLABOR, Innovationen für urbane Lebensqualität GmbH |
| A1P028: Affiliation | Municipality / Public Bodies | Municipality / Public Bodies | Other | Municipality / Public Bodies | Other | Other | Research Center / University | Research Center / University | Research Center / University | SME / Industry | Research Center / University | Municipality / Public Bodies | Research Center / University | SME / Industry |
| A1P028: Other | Municipality of Leon - ILRUV | CENERO Energy GmbH | ||||||||||||
| A1P029: Email | giavasoglou@kifissia.gr | dscm.adelina@cm-maia.pt | begona.gonzalo@aytoleon.es | Jasper.tonen@groningen.nl | sib@cenero.de | markus.olofsgard@afry.com | terttu.vainio@vtt.fi | Annette.Steingrube@ise.fraunhofer.de | Jsalom@irec.cat | gerhard.hofer@e-sieben.at | ase.sorensen@sintef.no | ozlemkocaer2@gmail.com | jih@du.se | katharina.schwarz@stadtlaborgraz.at |
| Contact person for other special topics | ||||||||||||||
| A1P030: Name | Stavros Zapantis - vice mayor | Carolina Gonçalves (AdEPorto) | Monica Prada Corral | Simon Baum | Hasan Burak Cavka | Xingxing Zhang | Hans Schnitzer | |||||||
| A1P031: Email | stavros.zapantis@gmail.com | carolinagoncalves@adeporto.eu | Monica.Prada@ilruv.es | sib@cenero.de | hasancavka@iyte.edu.tr | xza@du.se | hans.schnitzer@stadtlaborgraz.at | |||||||
| Pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| A2P001: Fields of application | ||||||||||||||
| A2P001: Fields of application |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A2P001: Other | Urban Management; Air Quality | |||||||||||||
| A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields | ||||||||||||||
| A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields | Energy production: - installation of photovoltaic systems for renewable on-site energy production; - installation of a BIPV demonstrator for the City Hall building. Energy flexibility: - implementation of an energy community through an active citizens involvement process. Digital technologies: - smart-meters installation in some dwellings in order to monitor consumption and suggest more sustainable energy behaviours. [PCP] Through https://balcaodigital.e-redes.pt/consumptions/history “Espaço Municipal” (https://www.espacomunicipal.pt/pt/) might access history of consumption up to midnight of the previous day. E-mobility: - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban comfort and air quality: - Monitoring units for air pollutants concentration (PM2.5, PM10, NO2) [PCP] Currently we are monitoring CO, O3, NO2, SO2, noise, PM2.5 and PM10 at a point 267 m east from the four buildings southeast of Sobreiro area: | Energy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit Energy production: - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Energy flexibility: - testing share energy solutions (public-private stakeholders) Digital technologies - smart city platform - smart energy management E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; - e-bike/bikesharing services implementation. | Energy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streams | link based regulation of electricity grid | Energy efficiency: - A-class buildings - Heating by GSHP Energy production: - Installation of photovoltaic (PV) Digital technologies: - Smart control and monitoring of HVAC and indoor circumstances E-mobility - Installation of charging stations for electric vehicles; | Energy system modeling | Energy SmartLab capacities - Building simulation model: thermal inertia and thermal loads of a building or community can be co-simulated with a building model. – System Operator and Aggregator simulation models: the interaction with remote control actions carried out by electricity System Operators or flexibility Aggregators can be simulated as well. – Grid simulation model: the physical interaction of the building with the grid power supply can be simulated enabling the experimental validation of flexibility services to the network. Energy SmartLab systems - SAFT Li-ion battery: maximum stored energy 20000 Wh, rated power 150 kW, rated discharge current 200 A, rated charge current 34 A, operating voltage 189 V – 227 V – 254 V, capacity 82 Ah. – Ultracapacitors: maximum stored energy 57 Wh, rated power 10 kW, rated current 20 A, peak current (<1s) 200 Apk, operating voltage 250 V – 500 V, capacity 1,65 F. – Electric vehicle second life battery: maximum stored energy 23300 Wh, rated power 40 kW, rated current 150 A, operating voltage 240 V – 400 V, capacity 32 Ah - 5 microgrid emulators (emulated power 5.5 kVA, max generation connected 10kVA, max consumption connected 10 kVA) - 1 grid emulator (Rated power: 200 kVA, Rated current per phase: 350 A, Rated current per neutral conductor: 35) | Campus Evenstad is a small department at Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, with 220 students. The vision for Campus Evenstad is an energy-flexible Campus Evenstad in an emission-free Europe. The area consists of approx. 20 buildings managed and owned by Statsbygg; the Norwegian government’s building commissioner, property manager and developer. The oldest building is from the 1700-century and the newest is the administration centre (2017) which is a Zero Emission Building (ZEB) with the highest ambitions (ZEB-COM). Their concept has been to realize Campus Evenstad as an energy pilot, where innovative energy solutions are demonstrated, showing how local areas can become more self-sufficient in energy. The energy system at Evenstad consists of several innovative energy solutions that are new in a Norwegian and European context. They are combined in local infrastructure for electricity and heat, which has led to new knowledge and learning about how the solutions work together, and how the interaction is between the local and the national energy system. The solutions consist of solar cells (PV), solar collectors, combined heat and power plant (CHP) based on wood chips, biofuel boiler, electric boiler, grid connection, district heating, heat storage, stationary battery and bidirectional electric vehicle (EV) charging (V2G). Statsbygg has gained a lot of operational experience from Campus Evenstad - both from individual technologies and from the interaction between these, which benefits Statsbygg's 2,200 buildings and 3 million m2 around Norway. Sharing of experiences is central. Campus Evenstad is a pilot in the Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods (ZEN) in Smart Cities were several of the solutions has been developed and studied. | Methods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4). In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED. | Load calculation and system optimisation: City Energy Analyst Identification of stranded assets for asset owners and investors to understand the carbon risks: CRREM | Energy efficiency: o Several activities: Workshops, Webinars to deepen the knowledge and raise awareness renewable energies o for example rooftop Photovoltaics green & blue infrastructures o Parks, Rooftop Gardens, Quarter Parks, Water elements included in the parks rooftop farming o To produce vegetables in the quarter stormwater management mobility o less parking and less cars in the district. Solutions for boosting public transport with sponsored public transport tickets; building of better bike and pedestrian infrastructure social aspects o district management was established in the district local supply of goods of daily need o Schools within 15 minutes walking distance Supermarkets and other shops within the district | |||
| A2P003: Application of ISO52000 | ||||||||||||||
| A2P003: Application of ISO52000 | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | ||||
| A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance | ||||||||||||||
| A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
| A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance | ||||||||||||||
| A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance | No | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | ||
| A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation | ||||||||||||||
| A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation | Mobility, till now, is not included in the energy model. | All energy demands are included in energy balance, either fuel demands or electrical demand of transport sector; Projection is made of future share of electric mobilty, rest is covered with synthetic fuels to achieve climate neutrality | – Electric vehicle second life battery: maximum stored energy 23300 Wh, rated power 40 kW, rated current 150 A, operating voltage 240 V – 400 V, capacity 32 Ah | At Campus Evenstad there is infrastructure for EV charging and bidirectional charging (V2G). EV charging is included in the energy balance. | Mobility is not included in the calculations. | - Number of cars per household - Fraction of electric cars - Number of public transport tickets (week/ annual tickets) | ||||||||
| A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand | ||||||||||||||
| A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum] | 3.49 | 1.86 | 1.65 | 0 | 135.715 | 0.77 | 3.862 | 0.6777 | ||||||
| A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand | ||||||||||||||
| A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum] | 0.57 | 1.45 | 0.7 | 31.76 | 0.76 | 1.226 | 0.03656 | |||||||
| A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility | ||||||||||||||
| A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum] | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
| A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure | ||||||||||||||
| A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum] | 0 | |||||||||||||
| A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year | ||||||||||||||
| A2P011: PV | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | no | yes | yes | no | yes |
| A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 1.24 | 0.7 | 0.065 | 1.028 | ||||||||||
| A2P011: Wind | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||||||||
| A2P011: Hydro | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 1.28 | |||||||||||||
| A2P011: Biomass_el | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.050 | |||||||||||||
| A2P011: Biomass_peat_el | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||||||||
| A2P011: PVT_el | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.28 | 0.01818 | ||||||||||||
| A2P011: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||||||||
| A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year | ||||||||||||||
| A2P012: Geothermal | no | no | no | yes | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||||||||
| A2P012: Solar Thermal | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes |
| A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.045 | |||||||||||||
| A2P012: Biomass_heat | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.35 | |||||||||||||
| A2P012: Waste heat+HP | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||||||||
| A2P012: Biomass_peat_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||||||||
| A2P012: PVT_th | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.0825 | |||||||||||||
| A2P012: Biomass_firewood_th | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||||||||
| A2P012: Other | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||||||||
| A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes | ||||||||||||||
| A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes | Geothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centers | PV plant of energy community locates outside of the city, not on the slot | 53 MW PV potential in all three quarters; no other internal renewable energy potentials known | Listed values are measurements from 2018. Renewable energy share is increasing. | Groundwater (used for heat pumps) | |||||||||
| A2P014: Annual energy use | ||||||||||||||
| A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum] | 2.421 | 0.7 | 132.5 | 1.500 | 5.088 | 0.318 | ||||||||
| A2P015: Annual energy delivered | ||||||||||||||
| A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum] | 1 | 0.2055 | ||||||||||||
| A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year | ||||||||||||||
| A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
| A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year | ||||||||||||||
| A2P017: Gas | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | ||||||||||||||
| A2P017: Coal | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | ||||||||||||||
| A2P017: Oil | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | ||||||||||||||
| A2P017: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | 0 | |||||||||||||
| A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year | ||||||||||||||
| A2P018: PV | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | yes |
| A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | 0.707 | |||||||||||||
| A2P018: Wind | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||||||||||
| A2P018: Hydro | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||||||||||
| A2P018: Biomass_el | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||||||||||
| A2P018: Biomass_peat_el | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||||||||||
| A2P018: PVT_el | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||||||||||
| A2P018: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | 0.187 | |||||||||||||
| A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year | ||||||||||||||
| A2P019: Geothermal | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||||||||
| A2P019: Solar Thermal | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||||||||
| A2P019: Biomass_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||||||||
| A2P019: Waste heat+HP | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||||||||
| A2P019: Biomass_peat_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||||||||
| A2P019: PVT_th | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||||||||
| A2P019: Biomass_firewood_th | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||||||||||
| A2P019: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0 | |||||||||||||
| A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary | ||||||||||||||
| A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.4540311173975 | 0.53839572192513 | 0 |
| A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED | ||||||||||||||
| A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum] | 0 | 6.93 | 0.036 | |||||||||||
| A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||||||||||
| A2P022: Safety & Security | none | |||||||||||||
| A2P022: Health | thermal comfort diagram | |||||||||||||
| A2P022: Education | none | |||||||||||||
| A2P022: Mobility | yes | none | x | |||||||||||
| A2P022: Energy | apply | yes | normalized CO2/GHG & Energy intensity | x | ||||||||||
| A2P022: Water | x | |||||||||||||
| A2P022: Economic development | cost of excess emissions | x | ||||||||||||
| A2P022: Housing and Community | yes | x | ||||||||||||
| A2P022: Waste | ||||||||||||||
| A2P022: Other | ||||||||||||||
| A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation | ||||||||||||||
| A2P023: Photovoltaics | no | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| A2P023: Solar thermal collectors | no | yes | yes | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | no | yes | no |
| A2P023: Wind Turbines | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Geothermal energy system | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P023: Waste heat recovery | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | no | yes | yes |
| A2P023: Waste to energy | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Polygeneration | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Co-generation | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Heat Pump | no | yes | yes | yes | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | yes | yes | yes |
| A2P023: Hydrogen | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Hydropower plant | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Biomass | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Biogas | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Other | The Co-generation is biomass based. | |||||||||||||
| A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility | ||||||||||||||
| A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) | no | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | no | yes | yes |
| A2P024: Energy management system | no | yes | yes | yes | no | no | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P024: Demand-side management | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | yes | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P024: Smart electricity grid | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P024: Thermal Storage | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | no | yes | yes |
| A2P024: Electric Storage | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | yes | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P024: District Heating and Cooling | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | no | yes | yes |
| A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systems | no | yes | no | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P024: P2P – buildings | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P024: Other | Electric grid as virtual battery | Bidirectional electric vehicle (EV) charging (V2G) | ||||||||||||
| A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency | ||||||||||||||
| A2P025: Deep Retrofitting | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | yes | no |
| A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildings | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P025: High-performance new buildings | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes |
| A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting) | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P025: Urban data platforms | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Mobile applications for citizens | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting) | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | yes | yes | no |
| A2P025: Smart irrigation | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposal | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Smart surveillance | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Other | ||||||||||||||
| A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility | ||||||||||||||
| A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private) | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances) | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P026: e-Mobility | no | yes | yes | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | yes |
| A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutions | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P026: Car-free area | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P026: Other | ||||||||||||||
| A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes | ||||||||||||||
| A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes | Test-Concept for bidirectional charging. | - Multimodal mobility nodes - Support of public transport tickets - Mobility consulting - District management | ||||||||||||
| A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates | ||||||||||||||
| A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | ||||
| A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes | Energy Performance Certificate - in Greece it is mandatory in order to buy or rent a house or a dwelling | The Municipal Buildings have an energy certificate, according to the Portuguese legislation. | Energy Performance Certificate - in Spain it is mandatory in order to buy or rent a house or a dwelling) | Energy Performance Certificate | Passive house (2 buildings, 4 200 m2, from 2015) | Energieausweis mandatory if buildings/ flats/ apartments are sold | ||||||||
| A2P029: Any other building / district certificates | ||||||||||||||
| A2P029: Any other building / district certificates | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | |||||
| A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes | Zero Emission Building (ZEB) with the highest ambitions (ZEB-COM) (admin building, 1 141 m2, 2016) | Klimaaktiv standard Voluntary! Certification can be for buildings and/or quarters. The different quarters are built in different standards. Ranging from bronze/silver/gold | ||||||||||||
| A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy | ||||||||||||||
| A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy | ||||||||||||||
| A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy | Climate neutrality by 2035 | Karşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030. System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023. | The study aligns closely with the decarbonisation and energy reduction pathways of residential multi family buildings with 1.5°C global warming target in Sweden. This study will also contribute to the achievement of the carbon neturality of whole Borlänge city by 2030. | City level targets Klimaschutzplan Graz - 2022 | Targets: - Climate neutrality until 2040 - Social justice and high quality of life - High innovation levels Mobilitätsplan Graz 2040 – under development | Targets: - Modal Split 80:20 until 2040 80% Public transport, bike, walking | 20% cars Kommunales Energiekonzept (2017) | Targets: - Increase of district heating Energiemasterplan Graz (2018) | Targets: - Energy efficiency of urban dwellings and infrastructures - District heating and solar energy - Energy efficiency of private dwellings - Climate conscious mobility National level targets Klimaschutzplan Österreich -draft, expected by 2024 | Targets: - Decarbonisation (reduction of GHG, renewable energies, - Climate neutrality until 2040 - Energy efficiency - Security of energy supply | ||||||||||
| A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid | ||||||||||||||
| A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| A3P003: Other | At a national level there are some studies regarding the decarbonization of the gas grid, but no concrete strategies so far. | |||||||||||||
| A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities | ||||||||||||||
| A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities | Freiburg has ambitious goals and wants to achieve climate neutrality until 2035, the PED concept could help to develop suitable strategies on district level | -Allows for real physical equipment to be operated under a broad range of scenarios without depending on the real occurrence of the boundary conditions suitable for the experimental validation -Pioneer in addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation. | According to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario. | In our project, we carried out a comprehensive exploration of strategies to achieve positive energy districts in a Swedish residential portfolio. The focus on urban energy transitions necessitates a holistic approach that integrates building retrofit, solar technology exploration, and heating supply optimisation. Exploration of Local Solar Sources: The analysis reveals varying solar irradiance resources throughout the year, emphasizing the importance of strategic placement. Integration of combined photovoltaic and thermal panels into building envelopes demonstrates the potential to cover a significant portion of the energy demand even in Sweden. Heating Supply Optimisation with Solar Technologies: Despite the surplus energy production from on-site solar technology, challenges arise due to temporal energy asymmetry. The introduction of heat pumps emerges as a feasible solution to balance energy gaps, utilising both rejected and free heat. Optimisation scenarios, utilising a combination of geothermal heat pumps, water source heat pumps, and PVT, showcase remarkable reductions in emissions and primary energy consumption. Urban Form and Energy Infrastructure Design: We realised the importance of returning to urban form and energy infrastructure design to optimise future residential portfolio potential. Building layout design, influenced by zoning regulations and innovative typologies, plays a crucial role in achieving district level energy efficiency. Future challenges, including demographic shifts, e-mobility, and climate change, necessitate a more holistic approach to energy infrastructure design, addressing not only heating and electricity demands but also cooling requirements. | Reininghaus needs green spaces and places Sector coupling of water, waste water, electricity ICT and demand side management Mobility - Reininghaus needs better infrastructure for bikes and pedestrians - Public transportation should be more affordable and Sharing should be implemented in the district Infrastructure should cover daily needs within walking distance Infrastructure for local jobs and shared offices | |||||||||
| A3P005: Sustainable behaviour | ||||||||||||||
| A3P005: Sustainable behaviour | In Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed. | Energy efficiency by renovation measures for buildings and measures for saving electricity; electrification by installation of heat pumps and photovoltaics and switching to electric cars, additional measures not directly related to PED like sustainable diet and sharing economy | -Improving the development of Net Zero Energy Buildings and Flexible Energy buildings. | While our investigation primarily centres on technical optimisation within Positive Energy District (PED) development, it is essential to acknowledge the broader scope encompassing social and governance dimensions. Specifically, understanding stakeholders' willingness to embrace technical recommendations upon project completion is important. Several potential influencing factors merit exploration, including economic considerations, technical optimisation-associated embodied carbon balance, the general public's technical perceptions, and operational feasibility. Evaluating these aspects holistically not only enhances the efficacy of PED initiatives but also fosters greater acceptance and participation within the communities they serve. | - citizen participation and promotion of functioning neighbourhoods (e.g., through city district management) As of today, solutions for the energy transition in the residential sector have focused on the construction of energy-efficient buildings and on the energy-efficient refurbishment of existing buildings. Measures to influence user behaviour and to directly address residents and neighbourhoods as actors of the energy transition play a minor role and are also not formalized. At the same time, moving into a new apartment offers a ‘window of opportunity’ to establish new everyday practices and behaviour. In already inhabited housing developments, well-functioning neighbourhoods or existing, ‘sustainability pioneers’ are key to motivating people to adopt more resource-efficient lifestyles. In order to prepare such agents of change towards more climate protection and sustainability in the context of housing, Austria launched the BAREWO project. The aim is to develop a kit of formats, methods, and interventions for resource-efficient housing. This toolkit will be tested in six testbeds, among which quarter 12 (Q12) of Graz- Reininghaus, as soon as first residents move in (approx. 2024). Austrian TRANS-PED partner StadtLABOR, which is also a partner in the BAREWO project, will support Q12 in this process. In parallel, a monitoring system will be developed to make the (climate) effects of the kit measurable. In addition, a guideline for property managers will be developed, which will serve as an orientation for them on how their residents can be coached in matters of climate protection and sustainability in everyday (residential) life. From the very beginning, (communication) measures are implemented and relevant stakeholders are involved in the project (project advisory board) to ensure the multiplicability, financing and broad application of the toolkit. If successful, the toolkit could also be scaled up to other quarters in Reininghaus. | |||||||||
| A3P006: Economic strategies | ||||||||||||||
| A3P006: Economic strategies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| A3P006: Other | operational savings through efficiency measures | |||||||||||||
| A3P007: Social models | ||||||||||||||
| A3P007: Social models |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| A3P007: Other | Campus Evenstad is a small department at Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, with 220 students. Sharing knowledge is essential: Evenstad has regular visits from Politicians, decision-makers, researchers, environmental organizations, and energy- and building companies. | |||||||||||||
| A3P008: Integrated urban strategies | ||||||||||||||
| A3P008: Integrated urban strategies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| A3P008: Other | ||||||||||||||
| A3P009: Environmental strategies | ||||||||||||||
| A3P009: Environmental strategies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| A3P009: Other | Positive Energy Balance for the demo site | |||||||||||||
| A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects | ||||||||||||||
| A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects | At national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen: Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation. Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries. The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals. Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricity | - European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (‘Renewable energy’ directive - 2018/2001/EU and ‘Common rules for the internal electricity market’ directive- 2019/944/EU). - Spanish building certification is regulated through Royal Decree 235/2013. | Campus Evenstad became a prosumer in 2016, as the first with DSO Eidsiva. Evenstad is also one of the first three PV systems in Norway to receive green certificates. | Mobility contracts: A mobility contract is concluded between the City of Graz and the property developers in the course of development plans and serves to reduce the motor vehicle traffic to be expected as a result of the construction project. Push & pull measures are agreed: With a lower car parking space key, which is significantly lower than today's usual requirements, offers and information for easier use of public transport, walking and cycling, as well as car sharing and e-mobility are simultaneously created by the property developers, leading to a win-win-win situation for all parties involved. Basic principles - Possibility of combining effective "push & pull" measures => control option (e.g. reduction of car parking spaces, but optimisation of accessibility to public transport and walking and cycling networks, public transport tickets, mobility information, ... etc.) - Changing mobility behaviour in favour of sustainable forms of transport from the moment the flat is handed over ("upheaval" in personal mobility behaviour when changing the residential location) - Reduction in construction and maintenance costs (underground car parks, public road infrastructure) - Easier realisation of larger construction projects in the inner city area with lower generation of vehicle demand Städtebauliche Verträge in Graz / Urban development contracts in Graz Qualitative urban (neighbourhood) development with added value for all stakeholders: urban development contracts are modern instruments in the development of cities and neighbourhoods. As one of the pioneers in this field, the City of Graz also increasingly favours this form of quality assurance. Urban development contracts are a contractual form of regulation between the City of Graz and landowners, which enables flexible control of urban (sub)development in the interests of the common interests while at the same time relieving the public authorities. The contracts make property-related stipulations in accordance with urban planning requirements (e.g. urban development concept, development concept, framework plan, zoning plan) and the specialist planning requirements in particular infrastructure, development, design and mobility. This is intended to infrastructure, services of general interest, building land quality and settlement development required for the (parts of the) city. | ||||||||||
| B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition | ||||||||||||||
| B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition | Assessment methods for this ped (and for germany) is defined in this project at the moment and will be tested at that case study | The biggest impact is the demonstration of several new energy solutions for local communities. Statsbygg/Campus Evenstad contributes to the development of innovations, pushing technological development through purchasing and demonstration of the solutions. This is a benefit for both end users, energy service providers and society at large. Evenstad also contribute to developing the local business community. For example, local biomass chip production for CHP, development of V2G-software etc. Several key solutions have been important when aiming to achieve the goals of reduced emissions, increased self-sufficiency in energy, and an energy-flexible campus. Example Vehicle-to-grid (V2G): We realized bidirectional EV charging at Campus Evenstad in 2019, demonstrating V2G for the first time in Norway. The experiences from Evenstad provide increased knowledge and practical experience from purchasing, installing and operating the V2G solution, and can contribute to creating new solutions within the energy system. With the equipment installed, the batteries in EVs can supply power back to buildings or the power grid. Example solar cells (PV): We installed PV in 2013 when there were only a few grid-connected PV systems in Norway. The PV system was an important piece in changing the view on solar energy in Norway, where businesses, the public sector and private individuals started seeing the potential for solar energy also this far north. In 2022, the PV system was expanded with PV cells on the facade of the energy center. Example Solar collector system: Covers 100m2 of the roof surface of dormitories and supplies supplies 117 dormitories with all the hot water they need (4000m2 floor area. The solar collector system is connected to the district heating system, where the main heat source is bioenergy. Solar energy and bioenergy complement each other at different times of the year. Example battery bank: Among the 5 largest electrical batteries in Norway connected to the grid. Example CHP: First of its kind in Norway, generating heat and electricity from biomass. Already in 2010, fossil fuels were phased out by converting from oil to wood-chip heating. | The pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED). | The Rymdgatan's Residential Portfolio in Sweden presents a compelling case study for its classification as a PED-related research, given its alignment with sustainable behaviours and overarching PED development principles as follows: Inclusivity and Social Equity: The residential portfolio situated in Rymdgatan caters primarily to a low-income community. By focusing on this demographic, the project addresses critical aspects of social equity within sustainable urban development. Ensuring access to energy-efficient housing and amenities for economically disadvantaged populations not only fosters social cohesion but also mitigates energy poverty, a pressing concern in many urban contexts. Multifamily Residential Building: The inclusion of multifamily residential buildings within the portfolio underscores a commitment to density and efficient land use, both essential components of sustainable urban design. Such developments promote resource optimisation by consolidating housing units, thereby reducing per capita energy consumption and infrastructure demands. Moreover, multifamily dwellings often facilitate community engagement and shared resource management, fostering a culture of sustainability among residents. Low Carbon Retrofitting and Transition: The overarching initiative to transition the entire Jakobsgårdarna district. The included Rymdgatan portfolio, towards low carbon retrofitting, represents a significant example of decarbonization and climate resilience. By integrating energy-efficient technologies and renewable energy solutions into existing infrastructure, the project not only reduces carbon emissions but also serves as a blueprint for revitalising old urban environments sustainably. This holistic approach to retrofitting demonstrates a systemic commitment to environmental stewardship and long-term sustainability. Climate Adaptation and Renewable Energy Integration: Despite Sweden's climatic challenges, including lower solar resources during winter months, the Rymdgatan project leverages its geographical context to optimize renewable energy utilization. Sweden's greater solar resource availability during summer and geothermal potentials complement the design's emphasis on seasonal energy planning, where surplus energy generated during peak periods can be stored or redistributed efficiently. By embracing climate-responsive design strategies, the project demonstrates resilience in the face of climate variability while harnessing renewable energy potential effectively. | Reininghaus addresses some relevant key aspects listed in the JPI UE PED Framework Definition such as: - high level of aspiration in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production; - integration of different systems and infrastructures; - inclusion of aspects not only related to energy sector, but also connected with social, economic and environmental sustainability. | |||||||||
| B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development | ||||||||||||||
| B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development | City is interested in transforming the quarter, as many buildings are old, have private owner structures and have decentralised heating systems. As the city wants to become climate neutral by 2035 action is needed now. In the research project PED urban the idea is to focus on the future energy system of the quarter and use it as a case study to develop a common assessment method for PEDs in alignment with european efforts in that regard | In line with the EU's vision of "local energy communities", Campus Evenstad demonstrates energy actions that contribute to the clean energy transition. The campus has been developed over several years, demonstrating several innovative and sustainable technologies and energy solutions in a microgrid, e.g. vehicle to grid (V2G), biomass-based combined heat and power (CHP), solar energy, energy storage and zero emission buildings. It shows how to use new technology to enable zero emissions areas. Dedicated professionals, both Statsbygg's operating staff and researchers from FME ZEN have been central to the realization, together with dedicated management at the University campus, who have shown a great willingness to implement new solutions. | Borlänge city has committed to become the carbon-neutral city by 2030. | The Reininghausgründe is a new quarter near the centre of the City of Graz. On the area of a former brewery, close to more, still working industries, a new town centre is being established. The quarter will include living areas, workplaces, shops, schools and a park, so that the need for individual mobility is minimized. It is connected to the historical city centre by bike paths, busses and a tram. Car sharing is provided as well. | ||||||||||
| B1P003: Environment of the case study area | ||||||||||||||
| B2P003: Environment of the case study area | Urban area | Suburban area | Suburban area | Suburban area | Urban area | Rural | Urban area | Urban area | Urban area | |||||
| B1P004: Type of district | ||||||||||||||
| B2P004: Type of district |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| B1P005: Case Study Context | ||||||||||||||
| B1P005: Case Study Context |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| B1P006: Year of construction | ||||||||||||||
| B1P006: Year of construction | 2005 | 1990 | 2025 | |||||||||||
| B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential | ||||||||||||||
| B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential | 0 | 5898 | 100 | 0 | ||||||||||
| B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential | ||||||||||||||
| B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential | 300 | 5898 | 100 | 10000 | ||||||||||
| B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential | ||||||||||||||
| B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential | 6 | 0 | ||||||||||||
| B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential | ||||||||||||||
| B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential | 6 | |||||||||||||
| B1P011: Population density before intervention | ||||||||||||||
| B1P011: Population density before intervention | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| B1P012: Population density after intervention | ||||||||||||||
| B1P012: Population density after intervention | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0.0011987804878049 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.010658622423328 | 0.01 |
| B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention | ||||||||||||||
| B1P013: Residential | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | yes | no |
| B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²] | 102795 | 4360 | ||||||||||||
| B1P013: Office | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||||||||
| B1P013: Industry and Utility | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||||||||
| B1P013: Commercial | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||||||||
| B1P013: Institutional | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||||||||
| B1P013: Natural areas | no | no | no | no | no | yes | yes | yes | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||||||||
| B1P013: Recreational | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||||||||
| B1P013: Dismissed areas | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||||||||
| B1P013: Other | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²] | 706 | |||||||||||||
| B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention | ||||||||||||||
| B1P014: Residential | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | yes | no | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
| B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²] | 102795 | 4360 | ||||||||||||
| B1P014: Office | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||||||||
| B1P014: Industry and Utility | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||||||||
| B1P014: Commercial | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||||||||
| B1P014: Institutional | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||||||||
| B1P014: Natural areas | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||||||||
| B1P014: Recreational | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||||||||
| B1P014: Dismissed areas | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||||||||||
| B1P014: Other | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²] | 706 | |||||||||||||
| B2P001: PED Lab concept definition | ||||||||||||||
| B2P001: PED Lab concept definition | Groningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city. | addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation | ||||||||||||
| B2P002: Installation life time | ||||||||||||||
| B2P002: Installation life time | Permanent installation | The MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact. | ||||||||||||
| B2P003: Scale of action | ||||||||||||||
| B2P003: Scale | Virtual | District | Virtual | |||||||||||
| B2P004: Operator of the installation | ||||||||||||||
| B2P004: Operator of the installation | CM Maia, IPMAIA, NEW, AdEP. | The Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties. | IREC | |||||||||||
| B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials | ||||||||||||||
| B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials | Groningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materials | |||||||||||||
| B2P006: Circular Economy Approach | ||||||||||||||
| B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials? | No | No | No | |||||||||||
| B2P006: Other | ||||||||||||||
| B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab | ||||||||||||||
| B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab |
|
|
| |||||||||||
| B2P007: Other | ||||||||||||||
| B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab | ||||||||||||||
| B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab | Municipality | Municipality | Research center/University | |||||||||||
| B2P008: Other | ||||||||||||||
| B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab | ||||||||||||||
| B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab |
|
| ||||||||||||
| B2P009: Other | Energy Agency | research companies, monitoring company, ict company | ||||||||||||
| B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities | ||||||||||||||
| B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities | ||||||||||||||
| B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab | ||||||||||||||
| B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab |
|
|
| |||||||||||
| B2P011: Other | ||||||||||||||
| B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab | ||||||||||||||
| B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab |
|
|
| |||||||||||
| B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people | ||||||||||||||
| B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people | Depends on the building: _Tecmaia is open to the public but the buildings are for the exclusive use of companies allocated at the industrial site; _The municipal buildings have public access; _The residential buildings have an exclusive use for the residents. | |||||||||||||
| B2P014: Monitoring measures | ||||||||||||||
| B2P014: Monitoring measures |
|
|
| |||||||||||
| B2P015: Key Performance indicators | ||||||||||||||
| B2P015: Key Performance indicators |
|
|
| |||||||||||
| B2P016: Execution of operations | ||||||||||||||
| B2P016: Execution of operations | Current PED status (WP5 SPARCS): Conceptualization and methodology definition of the (virtual) PED for Maia Municipality with real monitoring and assessment in order to replicate and scale up to a city-level PED. The financial investments were already targeted. | |||||||||||||
| B2P017: Capacities | ||||||||||||||
| B2P017: Capacities | _Energy production and storage, _Monitoring; _Digitization. | - Building simulation model: thermal inertia and thermal loads of a building or community can be co-simulated with a building model. – System Operator and Aggregator simulation models: the interaction with remote control actions carried out by electricity System Operators or flexibility Aggregators can be simulated as well. – Grid simulation model: the physical interaction of the building with the grid power supply can be simulated enabling the experimental validation of flexibility services to the network. | ||||||||||||
| B2P018: Relations with stakeholders | ||||||||||||||
| B2P018: Relations with stakeholders | The relationship with stakeholders (municipal companies, industry, citizens, etc) has been fundamental for the definition of the PED. In this sense, some sessions were organized to gather different points of view in order to trace the best path for the PED. Also, the participation of Maia Municipality in EU projects, as EHHUR and OMEGA-X, makes possible the share of knowledge between different partners. | |||||||||||||
| B2P019: Available tools | ||||||||||||||
| B2P019: Available tools |
|
|
| |||||||||||
| B2P019: Available tools | ||||||||||||||
| B2P020: External accessibility | ||||||||||||||
| B2P020: External accessibility | ||||||||||||||
| C1P001: Unlocking Factors | ||||||||||||||
| C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | |
| C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | |
| C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | |
| C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | ||
| C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | |
| C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | |
| C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | ||
| C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | ||
| C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up) | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | |
| C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down) | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | |
| C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.) | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | |
| C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | |
| C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | |
| C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | |
| C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES) | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | ||
| C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | |
| C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | ||
| C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any) | ||||||||||||||
| C1P002: Driving Factors | ||||||||||||||
| C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | |
| C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency) | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | |
| C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | |
| C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | |
| C1P002: Economic growth need | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | |
| C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.) | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | |
| C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | |
| C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | |
| C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | ||
| C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any) | Earthquakes due to gas extraction | |||||||||||||
| C1P003: Administrative barriers | ||||||||||||||
| C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | |
| C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | |
| C1P003: Lack of public participation | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | |
| C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | |
| C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | |
| C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | |
| C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | |
| C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | |
| C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos) | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | |
| C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | |
| C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | ||
| C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any) | ||||||||||||||
| C1P004: Policy barriers | ||||||||||||||
| C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | |
| C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | |
| C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | |
| C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | ||
| C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any) | ||||||||||||||
| C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers | ||||||||||||||
| C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | |
| C1P005: Regulatory instability | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | |
| C1P005: Non-effective regulations | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | |
| C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | |
| C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | |
| C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | |
| C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | |
| C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | ||
| C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | ||
| C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any) | laws favouring big energy companies | |||||||||||||
| C1P006: Environmental barriers | ||||||||||||||
| C1P006: Environmental barriers | - Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 - Water Scarcity: 1 | 2 - Slightly important | ||||||||||||
| C1P007: Technical barriers | ||||||||||||||
| C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | |
| C1P007: Deficient planning | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | |
| C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | |
| C1P007: Lack of well-defined process | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | |
| C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | |
| C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | |
| C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | |
| C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | |
| C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
| C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
| C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | ||
| C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any) | Energy management systems of different new technologies does not "talk together" (e.g. solar inverter, V2G inverter). This creates challenges. | |||||||||||||
| C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers | ||||||||||||||
| C1P008: Inertia | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | |
| C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | |
| C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | |
| C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | |
| C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | |
| C1P008: Rebound effect | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | |
| C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | |
| C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | |
| C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | |
| C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | ||
| C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | ||
| C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any) | ||||||||||||||
| C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers | ||||||||||||||
| C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | ||
| C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | ||
| C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | ||
| C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | ||
| C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | ||
| C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | ||
| C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any) | Different interests - Grid/energy stakeholders and building stakeholders | |||||||||||||
| C1P010: Financial barriers | ||||||||||||||
| C1P010: Hidden costs | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | ||
| C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | ||
| C1P010: Economic crisis | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | ||
| C1P010: Risk and uncertainty | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | ||
| C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | ||
| C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | |||
| C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | ||
| C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any) | ||||||||||||||
| C1P011: Market barriers | ||||||||||||||
| C1P011: Split incentives | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | ||
| C1P011: Energy price distortion | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | ||
| C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs) | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | ||
| C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | ||
| C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any) | ||||||||||||||
| C1P012: Stakeholders involved | ||||||||||||||
| C1P012: Government/Public Authorities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| C1P012: Research & Innovation |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| C1P012: Financial/Funding |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| C1P012: Business process management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| C1P012: Urban Services providers |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| C1P012: Real Estate developers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| C1P012: Design/Construction companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| C1P012: Other |
| |||||||||||||
| C1P012: Other (if any) | ||||||||||||||
| Summary |
Authors (framework concept)
Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)
Contributors (to the content)
Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)
Implemented by
Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)
