Search
Close this search box.
Search
Map View
Table View
Projects
Filters:
Clear Filters Export All Entries (CSV)
NameProjectTypeCompare
Tartu, Estonia V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, the Netherlands (District of Kanaleneiland) V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Portugal V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Uncompare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Uncompare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Uncompare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Uncompare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study
TitleKifissia, Energy community
City of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block
«×»
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT
«×»
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city
«×»
Halmstad, Fyllinge
«×»
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark
«×»
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus
«×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabKifissia, Energy communityCity of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva blockLubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMATRiga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student cityHalmstad, FyllingeVienna, Am KempelenparkIstanbul, Ozyegin University Campus
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynoyesnoyesnoyesno
PED relevant case studyyesnononoyesnoyes
PED Lab.nonoyesnononono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralitynononoyesnoyesyes
Annual energy surplusnononononoyesno
Energy communityyesnonoyesyesnono
Circularitynonononononono
Air quality and urban comfortyesnoyesnononoyes
Electrificationyesnononononoyes
Net-zero energy costnonononononono
Net-zero emissionnonoyesnononono
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nonoyesyesnonono
Maximise self-sufficiencynoyesnoyesnonono
Othernonononononoyes
Other (A1P004)almost nZEB district
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabPlanning PhaseIn operationImplementation PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhaseImplementation Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date06/1811/1901/2401/2107/1610/24
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date03/2212/2312/2601/3002/2510/28
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • General statistical datasets
  • General statistical datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • General statistical datasets
  • General statistical datasets
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
    • M. Hukkalainen, F. Zarrin, K. Klobut, O. Lindholm, M. Ranta, P. Hajduk, T. Vainio-Kaila, E. Wanne, J. Tartia, H. Horn, K. Kontu, J. Juhmen, S. Santala, R. Turtiainen, J. Töyräs, T. Koljonen. (2020). Deliverable D3.1 Detailed plan of the Espoo smart city lighthouse demonstrations. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2020-09/SPARCS_D3.1_Detailed_plan_Espoo.pdf,
    • Hukkalainen, Zarrin Fatima, Krzysztof Klobut, Kalevi Piira, Mikaela Ranta, Petr Hajduk, Tiina Vainio-Kaila , Elina Wanne, Jani Tartia, Angela Bartel, Joni Mäkinen, Mia Kaurila, Kaisa Kontu, Jaano Juhmen, Merja Ryöppy, Reetta Turtiainen, Joona Töyräs, Timo Koljonen (2021) Deliverable 3.2 Midterm report on the implemented demonstrations of solutions for energy positive blocks in Espoo. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2022-02/SPARCS_D3.2.pdf,
    • www.lippulaiva.fi
    • http://www.ceder.es/redes-inteligentes,
    • O. Izquierdo-Monge, Paula Peña-Carro et al. Conversion of a network section with loads, storage systems and renewable generation sources into a smart microgrid. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(11), 5012. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115012,
    • O. Izquierdo-Monge, Paula Peña-Carro et al. A Methodology for the Conversion of a Network Section with Generation Sources, Storage and Loads into an Electrical Microgrid Based on Raspberry Pi and Home Assistant. ICSC-Cities 2020, CCIS 1359 proceedings. Springer. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69136-3_1
        A1P011: Geographic coordinates
        X Coordinate (longitude):23.81458824.6543-2.50824.0816833912.9205416.39529229.258300
        Y Coordinate (latitude):38.07734960.149141.60356.9524595656.6519448.17359841.030600
        A1P012: Country
        A1P012: CountryGreeceFinlandSpainLatviaSwedenAustriaTurkey
        A1P013: City
        A1P013: CityMunicipality of KifissiaEspooLubia - SoriaRigaHalmstadViennaIstanbul
        A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
        A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CsaDfbCfbCfbDwbCwbCfa
        A1P015: District boundary
        A1P015: District boundaryVirtualGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographic
        OtherThe energy will be produced by a PV plant installed on the terrace of a municipal building. Members of the energy community (that is under formation) will benefit from the energy produced via virtual net metering. PV instalment and the buildings (owned by the members of the community) will be within the boundaries of the Municipality but not necessary in the same area/district/neighbourhood
        A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
        A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:PrivatePublicPublicMixedPrivatePrivate
        A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
        A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Single OwnerSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerSingle Owner
        A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
        A1P018: Number of buildings in PED9615250615
        A1P019: Conditioned space
        A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]112000170000
        A1P020: Total ground area
        A1P020: Total ground area [m²]1650006400000119264285.400
        A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
        A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0101000
        A1P022: Financial schemes
        A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estatenoyesnonoyesnoyes
        A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
        A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernonononononono
        A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononononono
        A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnonononononono
        A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonononononono
        A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnonononononono
        A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononono
        A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnoyesnoyesyesnoyes
        A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]3088757500000
        A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonoyesnononono
        A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonoyesnononono
        A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononono
        A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022: Other
        A1P023: Economic Targets
        A1P023: Economic Targets
        • Job creation,
        • Positive externalities,
        • Boosting local businesses
        • Boosting local and sustainable production,
        • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
        • Boosting local businesses,
        • Boosting local and sustainable production
        • Boosting local and sustainable production
        • Positive externalities,
        • Boosting local and sustainable production,
        • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
        A1P023: Other
        A1P024: More comments:
        A1P024: More comments:The Espoonlahti district is located on the south-western coast of Espoo. With 56,000 inhabitants, it is the second largest of the Espoo city centres. The number of inhabitants is estimated to grow to 70,000 within the next 10 years. Espoonlahti will be a future transit hub of the south-western Espoo, along the metro line, and the increasing stream of passengers provides a huge potential for retail, business and residential developments. E-mobility solutions and last-mile services have strong potential in the area when subway extension is finished and running. The extensive (re)development of the Lippulaiva blocks make a benchmark catering to the everyday needs of residents. The completely new shopping centre is a state-of-the-art cross point with 20,000 daily customers and 10,000 daily commuters (3.5 million/year). The new underground metro line and station, and feeder line bus terminal, are fully integrated. Residential housing of approximately 550 new apartments will be built on top. Lippulaiva is a large traffic hub, directly connected to public transport and right next to the Länsiväylä highway and extensive cycle paths. Lippulaiva offers diverse, mixed-use services, such as a shopping mall, public services, a day care centre, residential apartment buildings, and underground parking facilities. Lippulaiva received the LEED Gold environmental certificate and Smart Building Gold certificate. • Flagship of sustainability • Cooling and heating demand from geothermal energy system (on-site) with energy storage system, 4 MW • PV panels: roof and façade, 630 kWp • Smart control strategies for electricity and thermal energy, smart microgrid-system and battery storage • Charging capacity for 134 EVsThe Centre for the Development of Renewable Energy (CEDER)is specialized in applied research, development and promotion of renewable energy. Among the facilities of this Centre, the urban laboratory CEDER-CIEMAT assess the performance of different configurations of energy networks at the district level. This PED-Lab infrastructure is an energy district that connects six office buildings with energy generation installations by means of two energy rings: electrical grid (in operation phase) and thermal network (in the implementation phase). The buildings of this PED Lab can act as energy demanders or suppliers depending on the climatic and operational conditions. The majority of these buildings are constructed with conventional technologies but some of them are implemented with efficient and sustainable measures. The thermal network is composed by two biomass boilers, 300 kW power each, and water tanks with 90 kWh of thermal storage. This network will shortly be expanded with a low temperature (90°C) and high temperature (150°-250°C) rings. The low-temperature ring is made up by two Stirling engine cogeneration boilers (one biomass gasification boiler and one gas boiler). The high-temperature ring has a thermal generator made up of Fresnel solar concentrators and an ORC cogeneration system fed directly from the solar concentrator. The high-temperature ring is interconnected with the low-temperature ring through an oil/water heat exchanger. This network has thermal storage systems in the modalities of: aquifers, boreholes, phase change materials, cold storage with geothermal exchange ground recovery and thermal storage at very low temperature with zeolites. The electrical grid incorporates different renewable generation technologies (50 kW wind turbine and eight different photovoltaic systems, a reversible hydraulic system), and engine generator of 100 kVA, electricity storages (batteries) and flexible loads.In addition to having the most energy efficient academic building in Turkey, the university campus also has 3 buildings with LEED NC Campus certificate and LEED BD+C Gold certificate. In addition, it aims to continuously improve the energy efficiency objectives on campus in an innovative way. For this purpose, energy management and storage systems are being installed in the Dormitory 6 building, which is used as the demo area of the LEGOFIT project, for the purpose of turning it into a PED project.
        A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
        A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]1
        Contact person for general enquiries
        A1P026: NameArtemis Giavasoglou, Kleopatra KalampokaElina EkelundDr. Raquel RamosJudith StiekemaMarkus OlofsgårdGerhard HoferCem Keskin
        A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of Kifissia – SPARCS local teamCitycon OyjCentre for the Development of Renewable Energy (CEDER) - Centre for Energy, Environment and Technology Research (CIEMAT)OASCAFRYe7 energy innovation & engineeringCenter for Energy, Environment and Economy, Ozyegin University
        A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesSME / IndustryResearch Center / UniversityOtherOtherSME / IndustryResearch Center / University
        A1P028: Othernot for profit private organisation
        A1P029: Emailgiavasoglou@kifissia.grElina.ekelund@citycon.comraquel.ramos@ciemat.esjudith@oascities.orgmarkus.olofsgard@afry.comgerhard.hofer@e-sieben.atcem.keskin@ozyegin.edu.tr
        Contact person for other special topics
        A1P030: NameStavros Zapantis - vice mayorElina EkelundDr. Oscar SecoM. Pınar Mengüç
        A1P031: Emailstavros.zapantis@gmail.comElina.ekelund@citycon.comoscar.seco@ciemat.espinar.menguc@ozyegin.edu.tr
        Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYes
        A2P001: Fields of application
        A2P001: Fields of application
        • Energy production
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production,
        • E-mobility,
        • Digital technologies
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production,
        • Digital technologies,
        • Indoor air quality
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production,
        • E-mobility,
        • Digital technologies
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production,
        • E-mobility,
        • Digital technologies
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy production,
        • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
        • Digital technologies,
        • Waste management
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production,
        • E-mobility,
        • Digital technologies,
        • Waste management,
        • Indoor air quality,
        • Construction materials
        A2P001: Other
        A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
        A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: - eliminating waste energy utilizing smart energy system - utilizing excess heat from grocery stores Energy flexibility: - A battery energy storage system (1,5 MW/1,5MWh); Active participation in Nordpool electricity market (FCR-N) Energy production: - heating and cooling from geothermal heat pump system; 171 energy wells (over 51 km); heat capacity 4 MW - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Estimation of annual production is about 540 MWh (630 kWp) E-mobility - Installation of charging stations for electric vehicles (for 134 EVs) - e-bike services (warm storage room, charging cabinets for e-bikes) Digital technologies: - Building Analytics system by Schneider ElectricEnergy efficiency: - Buildings energy retrofit. Energy production: - Biomass Boiler capacity: 0.6 MW. Annual production: 1.2 GWh - Solar thermal collectors: 70 kW, planned extended to: 0.47MW - Geotermal & Absorption Pumps: 100 kW - Share of renewables after extension: 100% (30% solar thermal and 70% biomass) - AOC 50kW wind turbine. Awaiting installation of a two-way AC-AC converter for subsequent connection to the grid - Bornay Inclin 3 kW wind turbine, connected to 24 Vdc batteries, to be connected to the grid by means of Xantrex inverter/charger - 9kW photovoltaic park (66PV panels, brand BP Solar,type BP5140,of 140W) connected to the grid by means of two INGECON SUN 5 inverters - 5kW photovoltaic pergola (24PV panels, brand Solon, type P200, of 210W) connected to the grid by means of one INGECON SUN 5 inverter - 8.28kW photovoltaic roof (36PV panels, Brand LDK, type LDK-230P-20), connected to the grid by means of one INGECONSUN 10 inverter - 12kW photovoltaic roof (80PV panels, brand Gamesa, type GS-1501), connected to the grid. - Reversible hydraulic system connected to a 60 kW electric generator and a pumping system. -Stirling engine with a heat lamp based on natural gas, a helium cool lamp, 10kWe maximum power delivered and global performance of approximately 33%. Energy flexibility: - Thermal storage systems: water tanks 90kW, aquifers, boreholes, phase change materials, cold storage with geothermal exchange ground recovery and thermal storage at very low temperature with zeolites. - Electrical storage systems: batteries (lead-acid and lithium-ion). - Flexible loads. Control systems and Digital technologies: - Full monitoring campaign. - Smart-meters installation to monitor consumption and suggest another energy behaviours. - Dynamic simulation tools to optimize the energy performance. Urban comfort and air quality: - Meteorological stations to monitor the climate evolution. - Microclimatic simulation tools to quantify the thermal behaviour.A suite of replicable modeling tools will enable stakeholders to analyze planning actions towards positive energy in a cost-effective fashion, aiding their evidence based decision-making process. The tools will be able to model the district’s energy production and demand, optimize for flexibility and simulate mobility and transport. By employing gamification and co-creation approaches, the project will enhance public awareness and engagement in energy efficiency. The project will culminate in the publication of practical guidelines, reusable models, algorithms, and training materials to aid other cities to replicate the digital twin for their districts, fostering widespread adoption of sustainable energy practices.link based regulation of electricity gridLEED NC Campus + LEGOFIT Project Energy Efficiency: Tri- generation, Compliance with ISO 50001, ASHRAE 90.1, energy efficient appliances, HVAC and lighting Energy flexibility: Energy demand management Energy production: Solar PVs Onsite + (to be installed more) E-mobility: EV Charging stations Indoor Air Quality: Energy Management System, Compliance with ASHRAE 62.1, ASHRAE 55 Construction materials: Passive systems, LEED certified buildings, innovative materials such as PCM Waste Management: Zero waste document
        A2P003: Application of ISO52000
        A2P003: Application of ISO52000YesNoNoNoYes
        A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
        A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceYesYesYesNoYes
        A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
        A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoYesYesNoNo
        A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
        A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationMobility is not included in the energy model.The university operates a fleet of 13 electric vehicles (EV) (61kW power each). There are 5 EV charging stations on campus.Not included, the campus is a non car area except emergencies
        A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
        A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]5.58000
        A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
        A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]5.85000
        A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
        A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
        A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
        A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
        A2P011: PVyesyesyesnoyesnoyes
        A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.54
        A2P011: Windnonoyesyesnonono
        A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Hydrononoyesnononono
        A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Biomass_elnonoyesnononono
        A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
        A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: PVT_elnononoyesnonono
        A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Othernonononononono
        A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
        A2P012: Geothermalnoyesyesnoyesnono
        A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]5
        A2P012: Solar Thermalnonoyesnononono
        A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Biomass_heatnonoyesyesnonono
        A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Waste heat+HPnonoyesnononono
        A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
        A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: PVT_thnonononononono
        A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonoyesnononono
        A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Othernonononononono
        A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
        A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesConventional power generation: The university’s heat supply is designed as a local centralized heat supply system. Electrical power, generated in combined heat and power (CHP) units, is delivered to the distribution network and sold to energy traders as regulated by local legislation and norms. There are two natural gas burners acting as heat sources (3MW and 6MW capacity), and two CHP units (1.6MW and 0.45MW thermal capacity). All heating is supplied from the CHP plants. Renewable Energy Sources (RES): a wind turbine (3.6 kW) and PV panels (11.7 kW) are connected to the faculty microgrid. In the future it is planned to power the campus entirely from local RES.
        A2P014: Annual energy use
        A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]11.33.5
        A2P015: Annual energy delivered
        A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]5.76
        A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
        A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
        A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
        A2P017: Gasnononoyesnonono
        A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
        A2P017: Coalnonononononono
        A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
        A2P017: Oilnonononononono
        A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
        A2P017: Othernonononononono
        A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
        A2P018: PVnonononononoyes
        A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.00045547
        A2P018: Windnonononononono
        A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Hydrononononononono
        A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Biomass_elnonononononono
        A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
        A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
        A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Othernoyesnonononono
        A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]5.26
        A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
        A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
        A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
        A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Biomass_heatnonononononono
        A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
        A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
        A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
        A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
        A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Othernonononononono
        A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
        A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary01.053231939163500000
        A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
        A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]0
        A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
        A2P022: Safety & Security
        A2P022: Health
        A2P022: Education
        A2P022: Mobility
        A2P022: EnergyOn-site energy ratio
        A2P022: Water
        A2P022: Economic development
        A2P022: Housing and Community
        A2P022: Waste
        A2P022: Other
        A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
        A2P023: Photovoltaicsnoyesyesnoyesnoyes
        A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnonoyesnononono
        A2P023: Wind Turbinesnonoyesnononoyes
        A2P023: Geothermal energy systemnoyesyesnononono
        A2P023: Waste heat recoverynoyesyesnononono
        A2P023: Waste to energynonononononono
        A2P023: Polygenerationnonoyesnononono
        A2P023: Co-generationnonoyesnononoyes
        A2P023: Heat Pumpnonoyesnononoyes
        A2P023: Hydrogennonoyesnononono
        A2P023: Hydropower plantnonoyesnononono
        A2P023: Biomassnonoyesnononono
        A2P023: Biogasnonononononono
        A2P023: Other
        A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
        A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)noyesyesyesyesnoyes
        A2P024: Energy management systemnoyesyesyesnonoyes
        A2P024: Demand-side managementnonoyesyesyesnoyes
        A2P024: Smart electricity gridnoyesyesyesyesnono
        A2P024: Thermal Storagenoyesyesyesnonono
        A2P024: Electric Storagenoyesyesyesnonoyes
        A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnonoyesyesnonoyes
        A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnonoyesyesyesnoyes
        A2P024: P2P – buildingsnonononononono
        A2P024: Other
        A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
        A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnonoyesnononono
        A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnonononononono
        A2P025: High-performance new buildingsnoyesnonononoyes
        A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)noyesnonononono
        A2P025: Urban data platformsnononoyesnonono
        A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnononoyesnonono
        A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)noyesyesyesnonoyes
        A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononononoyes
        A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonononononono
        A2P025: Smart surveillancenonononononoyes
        A2P025: Other
        A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
        A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nonononononono
        A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)noyesnonononono
        A2P026: e-Mobilitynoyesnonononoyes
        A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnonononononoyes
        A2P026: Car-free areanonoyesnononoyes
        A2P026: OtherLocal transportation hub with direct connection to metro & bus terminal; parking spaces for 1,400 bicycles and for 1,300 cars Promoting e-Mobility: 134 charging stations, A technical reservation for expanding EV charging system 1400 bicycle racks and charging cabinets for 10 e-bicycle batteries
        A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
        A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
        A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
        A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesYesNoNoYes
        A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance Certificate - in Greece it is mandatory in order to buy or rent a house or a dwellingEnergy Performance Certificate => Energy efficiency class B (2018 version)In Spain it is mandatory the Energy Performance Certificate in order to buy or rent a house or a dwelling
        A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
        A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesYesNoNoNoYes
        A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesLEED (Core & Shell, v4) GOLD certification, Smart Building certification (GOLD)LEED BD+C, LEED NC CAMPUS
        A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
        A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
        • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
        • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC)
        • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
        • New development strategies,
        • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
        • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
        • Smart cities strategies,
        • New development strategies,
        • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
        • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
        • Smart cities strategies,
        • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
        • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
        • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
        • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC)
        • Smart cities strategies,
        • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
        • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
        • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
        A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
        A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyRelevant city strategies behind PED development in Espoo include the following: - The Espoo Story: Sustainability is heavily included within the values and goals of the current Espoo city strategy, also known as the Espoo Story, running from 2021 to 2025. For example, the strategy names being a responsible pioneer as one of the main values of the city and has chosen achieving carbon neutrality by 2030 as one of the main goals of the current council term. In addition to the Espoo story, four cross-administrative development programmes act as cooperation platforms that allow the city, together with its partners, to develop innovative solutions through experiments and pilot projects in line with the Espoo Story. The Sustainable Espoo development programme is one of the four programmes, thus putting sustainability on the forefront in city development work. - EU Mission: 100 climate-neutral and smart cities by 2030: Cities selected for the Mission commit to achieving carbon-neutrality in 2030. A key tool in the Mission is the Climate City Contract. Each selected city will prepare and implement its contracts in collaboration with local businesses as well as other stakeholders and residents. - Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy: Espoo is committed to the Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy, under which the signatories commit to supporting the European Union’s 40% greenhouse gas emission reduction goal by 2030. The Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP) is a key instrument for implementing the agreement. The Action Plan outlines the key measures the city will take to achieve its carbon neutrality goal. The plan also includes a mapping of climate change risks and vulnerabilities, adaptation measures, emission calculations, emission reduction scenarios and impact estimations of measures. The SECAP of the City of Espoo is available here (only available in Finnish). - UN Sustainable development Goals: The city of Espoo has committed to becoming a forerunner and achieving the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) by 2025. The goal is to make Espoo financially, ecologically, socially, and culturally sustainable. - The Circular Cities Declaration: At the end of 2020, Espoo signed the Europe-wide circular economy commitment Circular Cities Declaration. The ten goals of the declaration promote the implementation of the city’s circular economy. - Espoo Clean Heat: Fortum and the City of Espoo are committed to producing carbon-neutral district heating in the network operating in the areas of Espoo, Kauniainen and Kirkkonummi during the 2020s. The district heating network provides heating to some 250,000 end-users in homes and offices. Coal will be completely abandoned in the production of district heating by 2025. The main targets related to PED development included in the noted city strategies are the following: - Espoo will achieve carbon neutrality by 2030. To be precise, this carbon neutrality goal is defined as an 80% emission reduction from the 1990 level by the year 2030. The remaining 20% share can be absorbed in carbon sinks or compensated by other means. - District heating in Espoo will be carbon-neutral by 2029, and coal-based production will be phased out from district heating by 2025. - Espoo aims to end the use of fossil fuels in the heating of city-owned buildings by 2025. - Quantitative goals within the Espoo SECAP report: - Espoo aims to reduce total energy consumption within the municipal sector by 7.5% by the end of 2025 in comparison to the 2015 level. The social housing company Espoon Asunnot OY aims to meet the same target. - Espoo aims to cover 10% of the energy consumption of new buildings via on-site production. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of cycling to 15% by 2024. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of public transport by 1.1% yearly. - Espoo aims to reduce the emissions of bus transport by 90% by the end of 2025, when compared to 2010 levels.- Testing the combination of renewable technologies at district level. - Optimization of the generation side based on the weather forecasting and demand side. - Optimization of the control system, connected to the central node, to design and perform virtual analyses based on the combination of all the systems and infrastructures. - Optimization of ICT systems. - Design and management of a virtual analysis - Optimization of efficient measures: building performance, user´s behaviour… - Combination of flexible storage systems to operate the global installation.
        A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
        A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
        • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
        • Biogas,
        • Hydrogen
        • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
        • Electrification of Cooking Methods
        A3P003: OtherBoiler Automation, Energy Management System, Electric Battery Storage, Demand Management and Flexible Pricing
        A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
        A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities- Citycon (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) aims to be carbon neutral in its energy use by 2030 - Lippulaiva is a unique urban centre with state-of-the-art energy concept. The centre has a smart managing system, which allows for example the temporary reduction of power used in air conditioning and charging stations when energy consumption is at its peak. In addition, a backup generator and a large electric battery will balance the operation of the electricity network. - Lippulaiva is also an important mobility hub for the people of Espoo. Espoonlahti metro station is located under the centre, and the West Metro started to operate to Espoonlahti in December 2022. Lippulaiva also has a bus terminal, which serves the metro’s feeder traffic in the Espoonlahti major district.- Create a thermal energy storage tank to be used for air conditioning the buildings. - Some buildings need to be renovated both to increase the energy performance, the seismic behaviour and spaces liveability and comfort. - Optimizing the coupling between technologies. - Guarantee the flexibility to operate the renewable installations to operate in different phases and with different configurations. - CEDER is a public research center and needs to have connected any energy system to the same grid. - CEDER has an industrial develop area where some experimental thermal storage system could be tested.Carbon and Energy Neutrality
        A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
        A3P005: Sustainable behaviourFor Citycon, it was important to engage local people within the Lippulaiva project. During the construction period as well as after opening of the shopping center, citizens have been engaged in multiple ways, such as informing local citizens of the progress of construction, engaging young people in the design processes of the shopping centre and long-term commitment of youngsters with Lippulaiva Buddy class initiative. Users’ engagement activities are conducted in close co-operation with SPARCS partners.- Minimize the building energy consumption while maintaining indoor comfort levels. - Onsite renewable production with flexible storage elements to fix demand side and generation side. - Flexible control solutions through digitalization systems.Under LEGOFIT project, promoting sustainable behavior for better occupant experience is a targeted aim under a work package.
        A3P006: Economic strategies
        A3P006: Economic strategies
        • Innovative business models
        • Demand management Living Lab
        • Open data business models,
        • Innovative business models,
        • Demand management Living Lab
        • Local trading
        A3P006: Other
        A3P007: Social models
        A3P007: Social models
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
        • Digital Inclusion,
        • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
        • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
        • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
        • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
        A3P007: Other
        A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
        A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
        • Building / district Certification
        • District Energy plans,
        • Building / district Certification
        • Digital twinning and visual 3D models
        • Strategic urban planning
        • City Vision 2050,
        • SECAP Updates,
        • Building / district Certification
        A3P008: Other
        A3P009: Environmental strategies
        A3P009: Environmental strategies
        • Other
        • Energy Neutral,
        • Low Emission Zone,
        • Pollutants Reduction,
        • Greening strategies
        • Energy Neutral
        • Energy Neutral,
        • Carbon-free
        • Energy Neutral,
        • Low Emission Zone,
        • Net zero carbon footprint,
        • Greening strategies,
        • Cool Materials
        A3P009: OtherCarbon free in terms of energy
        A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
        A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects- Energy efficiency regulations (Directive 2006/32/EC and 2009/72/EC) - EU directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings => all new buildings should be “nearly zero-energy buildings” (nZEB) from 2021- European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (Renewable energy directive - 2018/2001/EU and Common rules for the internal electricity market directive- 2019/944/EU). - Spanish building certification is regulated through Royal Decree 235/2013.ISO 45001, ISO 14001, ISO 50001, Zero Waste Policy
        B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
        B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionLippulaiva is a project with high level goal in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production.ExPEDite aims at creating and deploying a novel digital twin, allowing for real-time monitoring, visualization and management of district-level energy flows. Cities consume 65% of the world’s energy supply and are responsible for 70% of the CO² emissions, hence sharing a lot of the responsibility for climate change. We are faced with the challenge of redesigning our existing cities to make them more sustainable, resilient, inclusive and safe. Developing Positive Energy Districts (PEDs), is a breakthrough way to deal with the issue of urban emissions and applying adaptation and mitigation strategies to climate change, while ensuring that these urban areas generate an annual surplus of renewable energy and net zero greenhouse gas emissions. PEDs must address environmental, economic and social issues, providing solutions to energy consumption, production, emissions, transport & mobility and livability. By constantly monitoring and evaluating parameters through existing and/or novel sensor systems (e.g., renewable energy production/supply, transport conditions, air quality, energy demand, meteorological conditions, etc.), unconventional techniques may be applied to provide more sustainable options for the district’s needs.The campus should be considered a PED case study due to its exemplary commitment to sustainability and energy efficiency, as evidenced by several of its buildings achieving LEED certification. This certification underscores the campus's adherence to rigorous environmental standards and its proactive steps towards reducing carbon footprints. Also, the integration of sustainable practices across the campus aligns with the PED framework, which aims to create urban areas that produce more energy than they consume. Therefore, this campus serves as a model of how educational institutions can lead the way in fostering sustainable communities and advancing the goals of PED.
        B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
        B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development- Citycon’s (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) target is to be carbon neutral by 2030 - Increasing sustainability requirements from the financing, tenants, cities, other stakeholdersExpected outcome 1 Increased number of (tangible) city planning actions for positive clean energy districts using the (proto-)PED design, development and management digital twin tools (based on pre-market research learnings) using open-standards based components which can be reused elsewhere. 2 Increased integration of existing smaller scale management systems (e.g. Building management systems) with open-standards based operational city platforms using sectorial data (e.g. building data, mobility, urban planning, etc.). 3 Enhanced data gathering approaches with identification of relevant multidimensional data sets (e.g. meteorological, load profile, social, geo-spatial, etc.) high-resolution real-time data streams (e.g. renewable energy production, energy consumption), and relevant forecasting data, drawing also on the work of common European data spaces. 4 Increased number of city planning departments / approaches using common data and (replicable) elements and processes. 5 Consolidated city sensor network specifications, complemented by appropriate data gathering approaches for soft data. 6 Improved performance of AI based self-learning systems for optimization of positive clean energy districts and bottom-up complex models. 7 Enhanced innovation capacity of local/regional administrations and accelerated uptake of shared, smart and sustainable zero emission solutions.The purpose of implementing the PED project on this sustainable campus, where several buildings have LEED certification, is to further enhance its energy efficiency and environmental stewardship by creating a district that generates more energy than it consumes. The initiator was motivated by the need to address climate change, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and promote renewable energy sources. Additionally, the campus's existing commitment to sustainability and the success of its LEED-certified buildings provided a strong foundation for demonstrating the feasibility and benefits of PED development, serving as a model for sustainable urban living and energy self-sufficiency.
        B1P003: Environment of the case study area
        B2P003: Environment of the case study areaUrban areaRuralUrban areaSuburban areaUrban areaSuburban area
        B1P004: Type of district
        B2P004: Type of district
        • New construction
        • New construction
        • Renovation
        • Renovation
        B1P005: Case Study Context
        B1P005: Case Study Context
        • Re-use / Transformation Area,
        • New Development
        • New Development
        • Re-use / Transformation Area,
        • New Development
        • Retrofitting Area
        B1P006: Year of construction
        B1P006: Year of construction20222024
        B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
        B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
        B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
        B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
        B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
        B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential9800
        B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
        B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential9800
        B1P011: Population density before intervention
        B1P011: Population density before intervention00000034
        B1P012: Population density after intervention
        B1P012: Population density after intervention00000034.337771548704
        B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
        B1P013: Residentialnonononononono
        B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Officenononononoyesno
        B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
        B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Commercialnoyesnononoyesno
        B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Institutionalnonononononoyes
        B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]285.400
        B1P013: Natural areasnoyesnonoyesnono
        B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Recreationalnonononononono
        B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Dismissed areasnonononononono
        B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Othernonononononono
        B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
        B1P014: Residentialnoyesnononoyesno
        B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Officenononononoyesno
        B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
        B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Commercialnoyesnononoyesno
        B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Institutionalnonononononoyes
        B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]280000
        B1P014: Natural areasnonononononono
        B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Recreationalnonononononono
        B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononononono
        B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Othernonononononono
        B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
        B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
        B2P002: Installation life time
        B2P002: Installation life timeCEDER will follow an integrative approach including technology for a permanent installation.
        B2P003: Scale of action
        B2P003: ScaleDistrict
        B2P004: Operator of the installation
        B2P004: Operator of the installationCIEMAT. Data detail in contact: mariano.martin@ciemat.es and oscar.izquiedo@ciemat.es
        B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
        B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
        B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
        B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?No
        B2P006: Other
        B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
        B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
        • Strategic
        B2P007: Other
        B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
        B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabResearch center/University
        B2P008: Other
        B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
        B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
        • Academia,
        • Industrial
        B2P009: Other
        B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
        B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activitiesThe operation of the laboratory with all the components of the energy networks requires a collaborative work between various departments and entities. On the one hand, it is necessary to optimize the operation of renewable systems based on the weather conditions, forecast of the demand side and the flexibility of the generation systems. On the other hand, the optimization of the energy demands through a more sustainable behaviour of both the building and the users want to be acquired. For this, it is necessary to take into account technical aspects but also market, comfort and encourage the user participation, creating a decision-making matrix that allows optimizing the operation of the global system.
        B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
        B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
        • Buildings,
        • Demand-side management,
        • Prosumers,
        • Renewable generation,
        • Energy storage,
        • Energy networks,
        • Efficiency measures,
        • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
        • Ambient measures,
        • Social interactions
        B2P011: Other
        B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
        B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
        • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
        • Tools for prototyping and modelling
        B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
        B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
        B2P014: Monitoring measures
        B2P014: Monitoring measures
        • Equipment
        B2P015: Key Performance indicators
        B2P015: Key Performance indicators
        • Energy,
        • Environmental,
        • Economical / Financial
        B2P016: Execution of operations
        B2P016: Execution of operations
        B2P017: Capacities
        B2P017: Capacities- Innovative grid configuration to connect bio boilers and solar thermal on buildings. - Environmental & air quality evaluation. - Testing and evaluation of high efficient heating & cooling systems: Gas, biomass, geothermal and absorption H&C pumps … - Definition and implementation of the different regulation modes for the global system. Using the data from the research focused-partners, several regulation modes for the DH network could be defined and implemented in order to obtain an optimal operation of the network. - Innovation in MPC control to enable harvesting 100% renewables in the most efficient way. - Physical integration of the technologies with the existing facilities at the living lab. - Connection between the solar thermal collectors to achieve the lowest heat losses, providing the possibility to use the grid as high or low temperature DH, according to the demand schedule of the buildings. - Test the bio-boiler of the last generation and ultra-low emissions biomass condensing boiler in order to increase efficiency and reduce GHG and air pollutant emissions of the DH plant. - Control of the supply temperature of the DH grid to enable 100% renewables harvesting in the most efficient way. - Research of the incidence of a normal building or a bioclimatic building in the DH grid demand. - Methodologies for concept validation: Definition of the minimum requirements to verify the suitability of the solutions proposed. - Tests campaign: Experimental operation and characterization in a relevant environment, to exploit the technologies at their best and test different demand profiles, different configuration and loads, with real time monitoring and continuous commissioning to control the performance of the technology. - Validation and upgrading recommendation for the DH&C at district level. - Evaluation of innovation actions for potential energy interventions with demand response in buildings. - The complete available infrastructure (MV and LV electric systems, transformation hubs, end consumption, generation sources, communication elements, etc.) belongs to CEDER-CIEMAT, making this the perfect scenario to test and try the performance of “Smart Grid” and “Microgrid” projects. - The type of electric grid, its voltage levels (MV or LV), its variety of real loads (different buildings with different profiles: industrial buildings, offices and so on) and its sources of renewable generation and storage, mean it is ideal for intermediate tests between a small-scale laboratory and final deployment of the real product.
        B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
        B2P018: Relations with stakeholdersCEDER - CIEMAT is a public research body assigned to the Ministry of Science and Innovation under the General Secretariat for Research, focusing on energy and environment. To develop this lab CIEMAT has relations with private renewable companies, research centers and academia institutions.
        B2P019: Available tools
        B2P019: Available tools
        • Energy modelling
        B2P019: Available tools
        B2P020: External accessibility
        B2P020: External accessibilityCIEMAT is a public body, so it´s open to any institution according the actual regulation and agreements.
        C1P001: Unlocking Factors
        C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
        C1P002: Driving Factors
        C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
        C1P003: Administrative barriers
        C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P003: Lack of public participation3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
        C1P004: Policy barriers
        C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
        C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
        C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P005: Non-effective regulations4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies4 - Important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
        C1P006: Environmental barriers
        C1P006: Environmental barriers3 - Moderately importantAir Quality Management Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Energy Efficiency Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Water Conservation Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Waste Management Importance Level: 4 (Important) Material Selection Importance Level: 4 (Important) Renewable Energy Integration Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Heat Island Effect Mitigation Importance Level: 4 (Important) Noise Pollution Control Importance Level: 3 (Moderately Important)
        C1P007: Technical barriers
        C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P007: Deficient planning3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P007: Lack of well-defined process4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
        C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
        C1P008: Inertia4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P008: Rebound effect4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
        C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
        C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
        C1P010: Financial barriers
        C1P010: Hidden costs2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P010: Economic crisis4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P010: Risk and uncertainty3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
        C1P011: Market barriers
        C1P011: Split incentives3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P011: Energy price distortion3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
        C1P012: Stakeholders involved
        C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Planning/leading
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Research & Innovation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Financial/Funding
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        • None
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Planning/leading,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Planning/leading,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Business process management
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Urban Services providers
        • None
        • Planning/leading
        • Planning/leading,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Real Estate developers
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • None
        • Construction/implementation
        • Construction/implementation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Design/Construction companies
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        • Construction/implementation
        • Construction/implementation
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        • None
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Construction/implementation
        • Construction/implementation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Other
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Other (if any)
        Summary

        Authors (framework concept)

        Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

        Contributors (to the content)

        Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

        Implemented by

        Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
        Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

        Join the Action

        PED-EU-NET is an open, interdisciplinary and growing network welcoming academics, practitioners and relevant stakeholders to contribute to the activities of the work plan.
        Join Now

        COST

        COST is an EU funding programme that enables researchers to set up their interdisciplinary research networks in Europe and beyond. We provide funds for organising conferences, meetings, training schools, short scientific exchanges or other networking activities in a wide range of scientific topics. By creating open spaces where people and ideas can grow, we unlock the full potential of science.

        PED-EU-NET

        The COST Action Positive Energy Districts European Network (PED-EU-NET) aims to mobilise researchers and other relevant stakeholders across different domains and sectors to drive the deployment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Europe through open sharing of knowledge, exchange of ideas, pooling of resources, experimentation of new methods and co-creation of novel solutions.

        Action Details

        Grant Holder
        Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome

        Start of Action: 10 September 2020
        End of Action: 09 September 2024
        CSO approval date: 24/03/2020

        © 2021-2023 PED-EU-NET COST Action CA19126. All rights reserved.