Filters:
NameProjectTypeCompare
Örebro-Vivalla JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Texel JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hällefors, Sweden JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lecce, SmartEnCity SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Firenze, Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Uncompare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Uncompare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Uncompare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Uncompare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleCityfied (demo Linero), Lund
Lublin
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district
Groningen, PED South
Munich, Harthof district
Freiburg, Waldsee
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabCityfied (demo Linero), LundLublinInnsbruck, Campagne-ArealBologna, Pilastro-Roveri districtGroningen, PED SouthMunich, Harthof districtFreiburg, Waldsee
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynoyesnononoyesyes
PED relevant case studyyesnoyesyesnonono
PED Lab.nonononoyesnono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusnoyesnonoyesyesno
Energy communitynoyesnoyesyesyesyes
Circularitynoyesnonoyesnono
Air quality and urban comfortnoyesnonononono
Electrificationnonononononoyes
Net-zero energy costnoyesnonononono
Net-zero emissionyesyesyesnoyesnoyes
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)noyesnonononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynoyesnonononono
Otheryesnononononono
Other (A1P004)Social aspects/affordability
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabCompletedPlanning PhaseCompletedPlanning PhaseImplementation PhaseImplementation PhasePlanning Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date01/1404/1609/1912/1801/2311/21
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date12/1904/2210/2312/2312/2711/24
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets,
  • Vehicle registration datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
  • Boeri, A., Boulanger, S., Turci, G., Pagliula, S. (2021) Strategie e tecnologie abilitanti per PED misti: efficienza tra smart cities e industria 4.0. TECHNE, 22, 180-190,
  • Barroco Fontes Cunha F., Carani C., Nucci C.A., Castro C., Santana Silva M., Andrade Torres E. (2021) Transitioning to a low carbon society through energy communities: Lessons learned from Brazil and Italy, ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2021, 75, 1-19.,
  • GRETA Project, Pilastro-Roveri case study. Available at: https://projectgreta.eu/case-study/renewable-energy-district/
  • TNO, Hanze, RUG,
  • Ped noord book
  • Data from the local energy provider available (restricted usage for some data points because of data security reasons,
  • renewable energy potential,
  • own calculations based on publicly available data,
  • Some data can be found in https://geoportal.freiburg.de/freigis/
A1P011: Geographic coordinates
X Coordinate (longitude):13.24337522.568411.42434673814025611.3973236.59065511.5696250599476047.885857135842917
Y Coordinate (latitude):55.69922351.246547.27147078672910444.50710653.20408748.2043626127515247.986535207080045
A1P012: Country
A1P012: CountrySwedenPolandAustriaItalyNetherlandsGermanyGermany
A1P013: City
A1P013: CityLundLublinInnsbruckBolognaGroningenMunichFreiburg im Breisgau
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CfbCfbDfbCfaCfaCfbCfb
A1P015: District boundary
A1P015: District boundaryGeographicGeographicGeographicFunctionalGeographicVirtual
Other
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:MixedPrivateMixedMixedMixedMixedMixed
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple Owners
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED54196241262941
A1P019: Conditioned space
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]21664.73222777.86206284070
A1P020: Total ground area
A1P020: Total ground area [m²]8000072833.4711351780000045.0935604920000
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0020000
A1P022: Financial schemes
A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estatenonononoyesnono
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernonononoyesnono
A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononononono
A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnononoyesyesnono
A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnononoyesnonono
A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnononoyesyesyesyes
A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Otheryesnononononono
A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnononoyesyesyesyes
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonoyesnononoyes
A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnononoyesnonono
A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Otheryesnononononono
A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022: Other
A1P023: Economic Targets
A1P023: Economic Targets
  • Job creation,
  • Positive externalities,
  • Boosting local businesses,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production,
  • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
  • Job creation,
  • Other
  • Job creation,
  • Positive externalities,
  • Boosting local businesses
  • Boosting local businesses,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
A1P023: OtherCreate affordable appartments for the citizens
A1P024: More comments:
A1P024: More comments:Lublin PED Area is geographically bounded and the ambition is to reach Self-Sufficiency. There is a shopping centre with a large rooftop area for solar generation and there are also an empty lot (just on the east side of the building) and a carpark area (on the north side) next to the commercial centre. These areas can also be evaluated for on-site (on the ground – or canopies for cars) energy generation. There are also new built (mainly in 2012) residential blocks with high efficiency and this district is so-called an “eco-district”. Thanks to the District Heating Grid (DHN), all buildings are connected to each other the network has potential for sharing mechanisms in the PED Area. Another opportunity for renewable energy is that these buildings are connected to more or less the end point of DHN and for this reason, a waste heat potential from the return pipe may also be considered. There are also small size residentials, that are not connected to the DHN, around the PED area and this enlightened the technical team for exporting energy from PED to these areas with a new infrastructure.Owners are two local social housing companies. The complete district will consist 4 building blocks, from which only the first one with 4 building is ready built and occupied. At the end, it would be a district of ca. 1100 flats in 16 buildings with 78000 m2The Pilastro-Roveri area is a large peri-urban district in the northeast of the city of Bologna (about 650 hectares). In particular, the northern area is mainly characterised by the residential sector of Rione Pilastro, a significant complex of social housing built in the 1960s in response to the housing emergency due to migrations from southern Italy and nowadays satisfying more global migrations. The southern area is instead characterised by the presence of the production district called Roveri. The area appears relevant for the research as it has several evolution potentials towards a climate-neutral district. In particular some key factors are interesting: - the presence of one of the largest photovoltaic parks in Europe on the roofs of CAAB, characterised by a production of 11,350,000 Kw/h of primary energy; - the presence of companies attentive to the issues of climate change and energy, able to act as facilitators for the area. This is the case of FIVE, a leader in the production of electric bicycles, whose plant is the first nZEB (nearly Zero Energy Building) productive building in the city; - the high presence of industrial buildings of different sizes needing a reduction in energy consumption; - the presence of obsolete, sometimes in decay, and of general highly energy-intensive buildings in the Pilastro area, accompanied by spread phenomena of energy poverty; - the presence of spaces that could be converted (e.g. unused warehouses, unexploited green areas, etc.); - the presence of an active community, characterised by numerous associations, but also by social challenges linked to multiple vulnerabilities; - the presence of local actors interested in the development of the area (including the Municipality, the University, Confindustria, ENEA, Confartigianato, etc.). Two main research projects are actually ongoing in the area, applying solutions towards energy improvement and transition strategies to guide the area towards climate neutrality: - GECO - Green Energy Community, funded by EIT Climate-KIC and active since 2019, aims to trigger a virtuous path of energy sharing between companies and citizens through the creation of an energy community. - GRETA - Green Energy Transition Actions, funded by the H2020 programme, aims to understand drivers and barriers on the involvement of citizens in the energy transition processes, by formulating Community Transition Pathways and Energy Citizenship Contracts. [from: Boeri, A., Boulanger, S., Turci, G., Pagliula, S. (2021) Strategie e tecnologie abilitanti per PED misti: efficienza tra smart cities e industria 4.0. TECHNE, 22, 180-190]
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]
Contact person for general enquiries
A1P026: NameChristoph GollnerDorota Wolińska-PietrzakGeorgios DermentzisProf. Danila LongoJasper Tonen, Elisabeth KoopsStefan SynekDr. Annette Steingrube
A1P027: OrganizationFFGLublin MunicipalityUniversity of InnsbruckUniversity of Bologna - Architecture DepartmentMunicipality of GroningenCity of MunichFraunhofer Institute for solar energy systems
A1P028: AffiliationOtherMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / University
A1P028: OtherAndreas Bärnreuther
A1P029: Emailchristoph.gollner@ffg.atdwolinska@lublin.euGeorgios.Dermentzis@uibk.ac.atJasper.tonen@groningen.nlstefan.synek@muenchen.deAnnette.Steingrube@ise.fraunhofer.de
Contact person for other special topics
A1P030: NameStefan Synek
A1P031: Emailstefan.synek@muenchen.de
Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
A2P001: Fields of application
A2P001: Fields of application
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy production
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
  • Digital technologies,
  • Indoor air quality
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy production,
  • Indoor air quality
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Digital technologies,
  • Waste management
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
  • Waste management
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Digital technologies,
  • Construction materials
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Waste management
A2P001: Other
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsSEE: D4.1 - Methodology and Guidelines for PED design https://makingcity.eu/results/#1551708358627-aefa76ef-66b2The buildings are designed based on Passive House standards and dynamic building and system simulations are performed to optimise the HVAC systems, that are a ground-water heat pump for space heating and district heating for domestic hot water preparation. Photovoltaic systems are installed in the available roof spaces, however, more renewable sources are required due to very large number of apartments (very high density) to reach PED, and thus, simulation studies are performed.Energy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax incentives (110%, façade bonus, eco-bonus, sismabonus, renovation bonus, etc.); - several activities - such as Workshops, Webinars, Roundtables, Urban Trekking, etc…- are encouraged in the area to deepen knowledge and raise awareness on energy issues among urban stakeholders (householders, occupants, workers, etc..); - reduction in energy consumption also through every day energy saving actions. The spread of energy poverty phenomena in the area is considered urgent both for the medium-low-income population living in Pilastro and for small and medium-sized enterprises placed in Roveri; - Project for a One-stop-shop to guide residents and enterprises towards more conscious energy behaviours (planned in Bologna SECAP). Energy production: - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a waste to energy plant connected to the district heating system; - presence of a large PV plant in the CAAB area - 11,350,000 Kw/h Energy flexibility: - testing energy community and collective self-consumption feasibility in Pilastro area through an active citizens involvement process; - testing energy community feasibility among SMEs in Roveri industrial area; - testing the potential of complementary energy consumption profiles between residential area (Pilastro) and industrial area (Roveri). Digital technologies: - smart-meters installation in some dwellings in order to monitor consumption and suggest more sustainable energy behaviors; - Blog Pilastro as a tool to inform about the main activities and events ongoing in the area; E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; - e-bike/bikesharing services recovery (in fact during Covid-19 in the area Mobike service was suspended) and implementation. Urban comfort and air quality - Control units for air pollutants concentration (PM2.5, PM10, NO2); - Microclimatic simulationEnergy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streamsEnergy system modeling
A2P003: Application of ISO52000
A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoNoYesNoYes
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceYesYesNoNoYesYes
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNoNoNoYes
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationMobility, till now, is not included in the energy model.All energy demands are included in energy balance, either fuel demands or electrical demand of transport sector; Projection is made of future share of electric mobilty, rest is covered with synthetic fuels to achieve climate neutrality
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]0.391.86135.715
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.6551.4531.76
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]0
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P011: PVnonoyesyesnoyesno
A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.42
A2P011: Windnonononononono
A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Hydrononononononono
A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_elnonononononono
A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: PVT_elnonononononono
A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Othernonononononono
A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P012: Geothermalnonononoyesnono
A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Solar Thermalnononoyesyesyesno
A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_heatnononoyesyesnono
A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Waste heat+HPnonononoyesnono
A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: PVT_thnonononoyesnono
A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Othernonononononono
A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesGeothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centers53 MW PV potential in all three quarters; no other internal renewable energy potentials known
A2P014: Annual energy use
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]0.96132.5
A2P015: Annual energy delivered
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]-2
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P017: Gasnononononoyesno
A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Coalnonononononono
A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Oilnononononoyesno
A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Othernonononononono
A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P018: PVnononononoyesno
A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Windnononononoyesno
A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Hydrononononononono
A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_elnononononoyesno
A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnononononoyesno
A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: PVT_elnononononoyesno
A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Othernonononononono
A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P019: Geothermalnononononoyesno
A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_heatnononononoyesno
A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Waste heat+HPnononononoyesno
A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Othernonononononono
A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary0000000
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]
A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
A2P022: Safety & Security
A2P022: Healthindoor air quility (indoor CO2 concentration) - measured on the extract air of the mechanical ventilation system. Relative humidity to avoid mold.
A2P022: Education
A2P022: Mobilityyes
A2P022: EnergySpace heating demand, thermal energy delivered by district heating, electricity of the heat pump, thermal losses of the pipes, and PV production.Energyyes
A2P022: Water
A2P022: Economic development
A2P022: Housing and Communityyes
A2P022: Waste
A2P022: Other
A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsyesnonoyesyesnoyes
A2P023: Wind Turbinesnonononononono
A2P023: Geothermal energy systemnononoyesyesyesyes
A2P023: Waste heat recoverynonononoyesnoyes
A2P023: Waste to energynononoyesyesnoyes
A2P023: Polygenerationnonononononono
A2P023: Co-generationnononoyesnonoyes
A2P023: Heat Pumpyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
A2P023: Hydrogennoyesnonononoyes
A2P023: Hydropower plantnonononononoyes
A2P023: Biomassnonononononoyes
A2P023: Biogasnonononononoyes
A2P023: Other
A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)noyesnoyesyesyesyes
A2P024: Energy management systemnoyesnonoyesyesyes
A2P024: Demand-side managementnoyesnonononoyes
A2P024: Smart electricity gridnoyesnonononoyes
A2P024: Thermal Storagenoyesyesnoyesyesyes
A2P024: Electric Storagenoyesnoyesyesyesyes
A2P024: District Heating and Coolingyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnoyesnonoyesyesyes
A2P024: P2P – buildingsnonoyesnononoyes
A2P024: Other
A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
A2P025: Deep Retrofittingyesyesnoyesnoyesyes
A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnoyesnonoyesnoyes
A2P025: High-performance new buildingsnoyesyesyesyesnono
A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)noyesnoyesyesnono
A2P025: Urban data platformsnoyesnonoyesyesyes
A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnoyesnoyesnonono
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)noyesyesyesnonono
A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononononono
A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnononoyesnonono
A2P025: Smart surveillancenononoyesnonono
A2P025: Other
A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)noyesnoyesnonoyes
A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)noyesnoyesnonoyes
A2P026: e-Mobilitynoyesnoyesyesyesyes
A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnononoyesnoyesyes
A2P026: Car-free areanonononononono
A2P026: Other
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesNoYesYesYesYesNo
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesTwo buildings are certified "Passive House new build"Energy Performance Certificate for each dwellingEnergy Performance Certificate
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoNoNo
A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
  • Smart cities strategies
  • Smart cities strategies,
  • Urban Renewal Strategies,
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • New development strategies,
  • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Smart cities strategies
  • Urban Renewal Strategies,
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • New development strategies,
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Smart cities strategies
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyCity level targets Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (PUMS) - 2019 | Targets: - by 2030 440,000 daily trips will no longer be made by car but on foot, by bike or by public transport; - by 2030 12% of vehicles will be electric; Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP) - 2021 | Targets: - by 2025 deep renovation of 3% per year of residential homes (insulation of building envelopes and adoption of heat pump heating system); - by 2030 reduction of electricity consumption at least of 20% compared to 2018; - by 2030 100% coverage of electricity consumption for municipal buildings; - by 2030 increase public green areas by at least 10% Urban General Plan (PUG) - 2021 | Targets: - by 2030 net zero land consumption; National level targets Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan - 2020 | Targets: - by 2030 reduction of 43% for primary energy consumption, with respect to the reference 2007 scenario. - by 2030 increase of 30% of energy production from renewable sources; - by 2025 energy generation for electricity independent from the use of coal;City wide climate neutrality by 2035, city administration climate neutrality by 2030Climate neutrality by 2035
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
  • Other
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
  • Other
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
  • Electrification of Cooking Methods
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
  • Electrification of Cooking Methods,
  • Biogas
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
  • Biogas,
  • Hydrogen
A3P003: OtherHeating GridDistrict heating based mainly on heat pumps and renewable sources
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesThe priority was to eliminate the CO2 emissions by optimizing the building envelope and the heating systems.Bologna needs to reach the climate neutrality proceeding by ‘part’ of the city. Pilastro-Roveri is a promising district due to the following reasons: - some buildings need to be renovated both to increase the energy performance, the seismic behaviour, spaces liveability and comfort; - Pilastro is a residential area with the presence of a high percentage of vulnerable inhabitants affected by energy poverty phenomenon. This situation needs to be prioritized; - Pilastro is characterized by the presence of large underused green spaces that can represent a valuable resource for social cohesion and for heat island phenomenon mitigation; - Roveri is an industrial area where some small-medium enterprises are investing in order to improve their facilities and to efficiency their production cycle; - Roveri and Pilastro areas present complementary energy consumption curves throughout the day/week with a high potential for energy sharing and flexibility.Freiburg has ambitious goals and wants to achieve climate neutrality until 2035, the PED concept could help to develop suitable strategies on district level
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
A3P005: Sustainable behaviourBologna SECAP, as well as the participation to the 100 Climate-Neutral Cities, promotes the PED model as an enabling tool to foster city energy transition process. In Pilastro-Roveri district two main sustainable behaviours approaches can be identified: - bottom-up approach - some citizens are joining forces to create groups of energy self-consumption, in view of energy communities’ implementation and, at the same time, some companies have already undertaken some efficiency intervention on the production system by leveraging highly energy-efficient technologies; - top-down approach - GECO and GRETA are international ongoing projects on the area that promote innovation and energy transition with important fundings from the European Union, but with a particular focus on citizen engagement and participatory approach. Simultaneously, new and updated planning tools such as PUG, SECAP and SUMP identify in this part of Bologna city a key area to enable an ecological transition process holding together all relevant stakeholders - citizens, small-medium enterprises and Institutions. These two thrusts (bottom-up and top-down) need to be optimized in view of a participatory pathway towards the grounding of a Positive Energy District in Pilastro-Roveri.In Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed.Energy efficiency by renovation measures for buildings and measures for saving electricity; electrification by installation of heat pumps and photovoltaics and switching to electric cars, additional measures not directly related to PED like sustainable diet and sharing economy
A3P006: Economic strategies
A3P006: Economic strategies
  • Innovative business models,
  • PPP models,
  • Circular economy models,
  • Demand management Living Lab,
  • Existing incentives
  • Innovative business models,
  • Blockchain
  • Open data business models
  • Demand management Living Lab,
  • Local trading,
  • Existing incentives
A3P006: Other
A3P007: Social models
A3P007: Social models
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Social incentives,
  • Affordability,
  • Prevention of energy poverty,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
  • Citizen Social Research,
  • Policy Forums,
  • Affordability,
  • Prevention of energy poverty,
  • Digital Inclusion,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
  • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Citizen Social Research,
  • Prevention of energy poverty,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
  • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
  • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
A3P007: Other
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
  • City Vision 2050,
  • SECAP Updates
  • Strategic urban planning,
  • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
  • City Vision 2050,
  • SECAP Updates,
  • Building / district Certification
  • Strategic urban planning,
  • District Energy plans,
  • City Vision 2050,
  • SECAP Updates
  • Strategic urban planning,
  • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
  • District Energy plans
A3P008: Other
A3P009: Environmental strategies
A3P009: Environmental strategies
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone,
  • Net zero carbon footprint,
  • Carbon-free,
  • Life Cycle approach,
  • Greening strategies,
  • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone,
  • Net zero carbon footprint,
  • Life Cycle approach,
  • Pollutants Reduction,
  • Greening strategies
  • Energy Neutral
A3P009: Other
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsPEDs in Italy are meant as strategies towards climate-neutrality: at national/regional/local level a specific legislation on PEDs development is not yet available. However, the European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (‘Renewable energy’ directive - 2018/2001/EU and ‘Common rules for the internal electricity market’ directive- 2019/944/EU). Italy, starting from 2020, has transposed the Directives at national level (‘Milleproroghe’ decree then made effective by ‘Promotion of Renewable sources’ decree 199/2021). At regional level Emilia Romagna in May 2022 developed a law encouraging EC model diffusion (LR 5/2022 ‘Promotion and support of renewable energy communities and renewable energy self-consumers acting collectively’). Energy Community, according to Lindholm et al. 2021, can be considered as ‘a first implementation step towards PEDs.’At national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen:  Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation.  Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries.  The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals.  Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricitydecision by the Munich City Council in 2019 to become climate neutral by 2030 / 2035
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionExtremely low building energy demand, the electric energy of the heat pump used for space heating is significantly lower compared to thermal energy for the domestic hot water preparation.Pilastro-Roveri district can be considered as a PED-relevant area. Even though at the moment the area doesn’t meet annual energy positive balance, it addresses some relevant key aspects listed in the JPI UE PED Framework Definition such as: - high level of aspiration in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production; - integration of different systems and infrastructures; - inclusion of aspects not only related to energy sector, but also connected with social, economic and environmental sustainability.Munich as demonstrator together with Lyon in ASCEND projectAssessment methods for this ped (and for germany) is defined in this project at the moment and will be tested at that case study
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentSince it is an urban area, with high building and apartment density, the need for CO2 reduction is quite relevant and thus, in new built, the minimization of CO2 emissions is crucial.Pilastro-Roveri district is not actually meant to become a PEDs. However, it can be considered as a PED-relevant case-study since a participatory transition pathway towards a more sustainable, efficient and resilient district is gaining ground, involving the main urban stakeholders. At the same time, the most recent city plan and policies (such as the city SECAPs - updated in 2021) are promoting PED model as a key strategy to guide Bologna towards climate neutrality by 2030.speed and scale of PEDsCity is interested in transforming the quarter, as many buildings are old, have private owner structures and have decentralised heating systems. As the city wants to become climate neutral by 2035 action is needed now. In the research project PED urban the idea is to focus on the future energy system of the quarter and use it as a case study to develop a common assessment method for PEDs in alignment with european efforts in that regard
B1P003: Environment of the case study area
B2P003: Environment of the case study areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban areaSuburban area
B1P004: Type of district
B2P004: Type of district
  • Renovation
  • New construction
  • Renovation
  • Renovation
  • Renovation
B1P005: Case Study Context
B1P005: Case Study Context
  • Retrofitting Area
  • Re-use / Transformation Area,
  • New Development
  • Retrofitting Area
  • Retrofitting Area
  • Retrofitting Area
B1P006: Year of construction
B1P006: Year of construction2022
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential65898
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential78065898
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P011: Population density before intervention
B1P011: Population density before intervention0000000
B1P012: Population density after intervention
B1P012: Population density after intervention000.068716412650868000.0107142857142860.0011987804878049
B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
B1P013: Residentialyesnonoyesnoyesyes
B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Officenononoyesnonoyes
B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Industry and Utilitynononoyesnonoyes
B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Commercialnononoyesnonoyes
B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Institutionalnononoyesnonoyes
B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Natural areasnononoyesnonoyes
B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Recreationalnononoyesnonoyes
B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Dismissed areasnononoyesnonono
B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Othernonononononono
B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
B1P014: Residentialyesnoyesyesnoyesyes
B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Officenononoyesnonoyes
B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Industry and Utilitynononoyesnonoyes
B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Commercialnonoyesyesnonoyes
B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Institutionalnonoyesyesnonoyes
B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Natural areasnononoyesnonoyes
B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Recreationalnonoyesyesnonoyes
B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Dismissed areasnononoyesnonono
B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Othernonononononono
B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionGroningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city.
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P002: Installation life timeThe MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact.
B2P003: Scale of action
B2P003: ScaleDistrictDistrictDistrict
B2P004: Operator of the installation
B2P004: Operator of the installationThe Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties.
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materialsGroningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materials
B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?YesNo
B2P006: Other
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
  • Strategic
  • Civic
B2P007: Other
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipalityMunicipality
B2P008: Other
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
  • Academia,
  • Private,
  • Industrial,
  • Citizens, public, NGO
  • Academia,
  • Private,
  • Industrial,
  • Other
B2P009: Otherresearch companies, monitoring company, ict company
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
  • Buildings,
  • Demand-side management,
  • Prosumers,
  • Renewable generation,
  • Efficiency measures,
  • Waste management,
  • Water treatment,
  • Lighting,
  • E-mobility,
  • Green areas,
  • Circular economy models
  • Buildings,
  • Demand-side management,
  • Energy storage,
  • Energy networks,
  • Waste management,
  • Lighting,
  • E-mobility,
  • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
  • Social interactions,
  • Business models
B2P011: Other
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
  • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure
  • Tools for prototyping and modelling
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P014: Monitoring measures
  • Available data
  • Execution plan,
  • Available data,
  • Type of measured data,
  • Equipment,
  • Level of access
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
  • Energy
  • Energy,
  • Social,
  • Economical / Financial
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P017: Capacities
B2P017: Capacities
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P019: Available tools
B2P019: Available tools
  • Energy modelling,
  • Social models,
  • Business and financial models
B2P019: Available tools
B2P020: External accessibility
B2P020: External accessibility
C1P001: Unlocking Factors
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
C1P002: Driving Factors
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important
C1P002: Economic growth need1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)Earthquakes due to gas extraction
C1P003: Administrative barriers
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
C1P004: Policy barriers
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P005: Regulatory instability1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
C1P005: Non-effective regulations1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P006: Environmental barriersUrban area very high buildings (and apartment) density and thus, less available space for renewable sources.
C1P007: Technical barriers
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important
C1P007: Deficient planning1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
C1P008: Inertia1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important2 - Slightly important
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Rebound effect1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important2 - Slightly important
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
C1P010: Financial barriers
C1P010: Hidden costs1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
C1P011: Market barriers
C1P011: Split incentives1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
C1P011: Energy price distortion1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
C1P012: Stakeholders involved
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
  • Planning/leading
  • Planning/leading
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • None
  • Planning/leading
C1P012: Research & Innovation
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • None
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Financial/Funding
  • None
  • Planning/leading,
  • Construction/implementation
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • None
  • None
C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
  • None
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • None
C1P012: Business process management
  • None
  • None
  • Planning/leading
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • None
C1P012: Urban Services providers
  • None
  • Construction/implementation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading
  • None
C1P012: Real Estate developers
  • None
  • Planning/leading
  • None
  • Construction/implementation
  • Planning/leading
  • None
C1P012: Design/Construction companies
  • None
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • Construction/implementation
  • Construction/implementation
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
  • None
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • None
  • None
  • Planning/leading,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
  • None
  • Planning/leading
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
  • None
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading
  • None
C1P012: Other
  • None
C1P012: Other (if any)
Summary

Authors (framework concept)

Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

Contributors (to the content)

Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

Implemented by

Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)