Filters:
NameProjectTypeCompare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Uncompare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Uncompare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Uncompare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleUden, Loopkantstraat
mySMARTlife, Helsinki
Aalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, Denmark
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabUden, LoopkantstraatmySMARTlife, HelsinkiAalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, DenmarkNTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, TrondheimIzmir, District of KarşıyakaRiga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynononoyesyesyes
PED relevant case studyyesyesyesnonono
PED Lab.nonoyesnonono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusyesnononoyesno
Energy communitynononononoyes
Circularitynononononono
Air quality and urban comfortnonononoyesno
Electrificationyesnonononono
Net-zero energy costnonononoyesno
Net-zero emissionnononoyesnono
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nononononoyes
Maximise self-sufficiencynonoyesnoyesyes
Othernononoyesnono
Other (A1P004)Energy neutral; Energy efficient; Sustainable neighbourhood
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabIn operationCompletedPlanning PhaseIn operationPlanning PhasePlanning Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date06/1711/1611/2201/1610/2201/24
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date05/2311/2111/2510/2512/26
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
A1P009: OtherOther
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
  • Inger Andresen, Tonje Healey Trulsrud, Luca Finocchiaro, Alessandro Nocente, Meril Tamm, Joana Ortiz, Jaume Salom, Abel Magyari, Linda Hoes-van Oeffelen, Wouter Borsboom, Wim Kornaat, Niki Gaitani, Design and performance predictions of plus energy neighbourhoods – Case studies of demonstration projects in four different European climates, Energy and Buildings, Volume 274, 2022, 112447, ISSN 0378-7788, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112447. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778822006181),
  • Deliverable, Report: Integrated Energy Design for Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods (syn.ikia),
  • Deliverable, Report: DEMONSTRATION CASE OF SUSTAINABLE PLUS ENERGY NEIGHBOURHOODS IN MARINE CLIMATE (syn.ikia),
  • https://www.synikia.eu/no/bibliotek/
A1P011: Geographic coordinates
X Coordinate (longitude):5.619124.98314810.00710.39647227.11004924.08168339
Y Coordinate (latitude):51.660660.18794757.04102863.42228038.49605456.95245956
A1P012: Country
A1P012: CountryNetherlandsFinlandDenmarkNorwayTurkeyLatvia
A1P013: City
A1P013: CityUdenHelsinkiAalborgTrondheimİzmirRiga
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CfbDfbDfbDfbCsaCfb
A1P015: District boundary
A1P015: District boundaryGeographicVirtualGeographicGeographic
Other
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:PrivateMixedPublicMixedPrivatePublic
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Single OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple Owners
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED12115
A1P019: Conditioned space
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]2360102795170000
A1P020: Total ground area
A1P020: Total ground area [m²]386031308000136.00032600119264
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area100031
A1P022: Financial schemes
A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estateyesnonononono
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]7804440
A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenononononono
A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernononononono
A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnononononono
A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnononononono
A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnononononono
A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnoyesnononono
A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernononononono
A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnonononoyesyes
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]11933557500000
A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonoyesnoyesno
A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnononononono
A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernononononono
A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022: Other
A1P023: Economic Targets
A1P023: Economic Targets
  • Positive externalities,
  • Boosting local businesses,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
  • Positive externalities,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
  • Boosting local businesses,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
A1P023: Other
A1P024: More comments:
A1P024: More comments:The project is a follow-up from the “Social Beautiful” concept which was developed in collaboration between Labyrint (Support in sheltered housing), Area (housing company), the municipality of Uden, and Hendriks Coppelmans (developer). The concept aims to provide an answer to changes in various policy areas and the changing demands of society. The Social Beautiful concept consists of the following elements: 1. Living, working, and community services are brought together in one location. A multifunctional residential and service centre is being realized at the location. 2. Housing is shaped by the realization of financially accessible homes suitable for the target group. The housing design is tailored to the target group. it may also include sheltered / protected living. 3. Work takes place at the location or from the same location. The work has a social function within the neighbourhood. Wage-related work must contribute to providing structure in the daily activities of the residents. 4. Neighbourhood management is organized from the location in the surrounding neighbourhood. A service package is provided from the residential and service centre that contributes to the ability of neighbourhood residents to live independently for longer, to strengthen the social network, and to improve the quality of life and safety in the neighbourhood. 5. The houses are suitable for use at all times for regular rental. Communal facilities must be realized within the contours of a regular apartment. The objective is to offer a suitable living and working situation to a group of vulnerable citizens. In this way they become a fully-fledged part of society. They not only make use of the facilities themselves, but also give substance to the level of facilities in the municipality. Due to the integrated approach, they experience a greater sense of well-being and security.
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]7804440
Contact person for general enquiries
A1P026: NameTonje Healey TrulsrudChristoph GollnerKristian OlesenChristoph GollnerOzlem SenyolJudith Stiekema
A1P027: OrganizationNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)FFGAalborg UniversityFFGKarsiyaka MunicipalityOASC
A1P028: AffiliationResearch Center / UniversityOtherResearch Center / UniversityOtherMunicipality / Public BodiesOther
A1P028: Othernot for profit private organisation
A1P029: Emailtonje.h.trulsrud@ntnu.nochristoph.gollner@ffg.atKristian@plan.aau.dkchristoph.gollner@ffg.atozlemkocaer2@gmail.comjudith@oascities.org
Contact person for other special topics
A1P030: NameAlex Søgaard MorenoHasan Burak Cavka
A1P031: Emailasm@aalborg.dkhasancavka@iyte.edu.tr
Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYes
A2P001: Fields of application
A2P001: Fields of application
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • Waste management,
  • Indoor air quality,
  • Construction materials
  • Energy efficiency,
  • E-mobility,
  • Digital technologies
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
  • Digital technologies
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.)
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Digital technologies
A2P001: Other
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: Energy efficient envelope, with good insulation, triple glazing windows and airtight envelope. (EPC = 0) Energy Flexibility: MCP controls for the heat pump in the apartments. Energy production: PV panels on the roof, Ground source heat pumps Waste management: construction waste was kept to a minimum and sorted and collected separately as much as possible. Indoor air quality: Exhaust ventilation and opening of windows Construction materials: low carbon emission building materialsStakeholder engagement, expert energy system analysis, future scenariosMethods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4). In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED.A suite of replicable modeling tools will enable stakeholders to analyze planning actions towards positive energy in a cost-effective fashion, aiding their evidence based decision-making process. The tools will be able to model the district’s energy production and demand, optimize for flexibility and simulate mobility and transport. By employing gamification and co-creation approaches, the project will enhance public awareness and engagement in energy efficiency. The project will culminate in the publication of practical guidelines, reusable models, algorithms, and training materials to aid other cities to replicate the digital twin for their districts, fostering widespread adoption of sustainable energy practices.
A2P003: Application of ISO52000
A2P003: Application of ISO52000YesNoYesNo
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoYesYes
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNoYes
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationnot includedLarge combined industrial, residential, and commercial area with complex flows of in- and outgoing traffic.Mobility is not included in the calculations.The university operates a fleet of 13 electric vehicles (EV) (61kW power each). There are 5 EV charging stations on campus.
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]0.1482183.8628000
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.1091481.2265000
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P011: PVyesnononoyesno
A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.0581.028
A2P011: Windnonoyesnonoyes
A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Hydronononononono
A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_elnononononono
A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnononononono
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: PVT_elnononononoyes
A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Othernonoyesnonono
A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P012: Geothermalyesnonononono
A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Solar Thermalnononononono
A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_heatnononononoyes
A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Waste heat+HPnonoyesnonono
A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]300
A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnononononono
A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: PVT_thnononononono
A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnononononono
A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Othernononononono
A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes*Annual energy use below is presentedin primary energy consumptionVery little wind production currently exists in the area. The electricity production of the waste incineration plant will be included at a later date. Aalborg East is partly a remarkable area for hosting a Portland cement factory that accounts for a substantial share of Denmark’s total CO2 emissions. In turn, it also provides waste heat to the district heating grid for all of Aalborg city and some of the smaller towns that are connected to the same DH grid.Conventional power generation: The university’s heat supply is designed as a local centralized heat supply system. Electrical power, generated in combined heat and power (CHP) units, is delivered to the distribution network and sold to energy traders as regulated by local legislation and norms. There are two natural gas burners acting as heat sources (3MW and 6MW capacity), and two CHP units (1.6MW and 0.45MW thermal capacity). All heating is supplied from the CHP plants. Renewable Energy Sources (RES): a wind turbine (3.6 kW) and PV panels (11.7 kW) are connected to the faculty microgrid. In the future it is planned to power the campus entirely from local RES.
A2P014: Annual energy use
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]0.1946205.088
A2P015: Annual energy delivered
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]0.0368399
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P017: Gasnonononoyesyes
A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Coalnononononono
A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Oilnononononono
A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Othernonoyesnonono
A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]300
A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P018: PVnonononoyesno
A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.707
A2P018: Windnononononono
A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Hydronononononono
A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_elnononononono
A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnononononono
A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: PVT_elnononononono
A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Othernononononono
A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P019: Geothermalnononononono
A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Solar Thermalnononononono
A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_heatnononononono
A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Waste heat+HPnononononono
A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnononononono
A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: PVT_thnononononono
A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnononononono
A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Othernononononono
A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary00001.45403111739750
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]-0.00043
A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
A2P022: Safety & SecurityPersonal Safety
A2P022: HealthHealthy community
A2P022: Education
A2P022: MobilitySustainable mobilityMode of transport; Access to public transport
A2P022: EnergyNOn-renewable primary energy balance, renewable energy ratio, grid purchase factor, load cover factor/self-generation, supply cover factor/self-consumption, net energy/net power, peak delivered/peak expoted, total greenhouse gas emissionEnergy efficiency in buildings; Net energy need; Gross energy need; Total energy need
A2P022: Water
A2P022: Economic developmentcapital costs, operational cots, overall economic performance (5 KPIs)
A2P022: Housing and Communitydemographic composition, diverse community, social cohesionDelivery and proximity to amenities
A2P022: Waste
A2P022: OtherSmartness and flecibility, Indoor Environmental Quality, Social performance - Equity (affordable housing, access to servicees and amenitioes, afforability of energy, living conditions, sustinable mobility, universal design)GHG emissions; Power/load; Life cycle cost (LCC); Demographic needs and consultation plan; Public Space
A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesnoyesnoyesno
A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnoyesyesnonono
A2P023: Wind Turbinesnononononono
A2P023: Geothermal energy systemyesyesnononono
A2P023: Waste heat recoverynoyesyesnonono
A2P023: Waste to energynonoyesnonono
A2P023: Polygenerationnononononono
A2P023: Co-generationnononononono
A2P023: Heat Pumpyesyesyesnoyesno
A2P023: Hydrogennononononono
A2P023: Hydropower plantnononononono
A2P023: Biomassnonoyesnonono
A2P023: Biogasnononononono
A2P023: Other
A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)noyesnononoyes
A2P024: Energy management systemyesnoyesnonoyes
A2P024: Demand-side managementyesnoyesnonoyes
A2P024: Smart electricity gridnoyesyesnonoyes
A2P024: Thermal Storagenonoyesnonoyes
A2P024: Electric Storagenonoyesnonoyes
A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnoyesyesnonoyes
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsyesyesyesnonoyes
A2P024: P2P – buildingsnononononono
A2P024: Other
A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnonoyesnoyesno
A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnononononono
A2P025: High-performance new buildingsyesnonononono
A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)noyesnononono
A2P025: Urban data platformsnononononoyes
A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnononononoyes
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)yesnononoyesyes
A2P025: Smart irrigationnononononono
A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnononononono
A2P025: Smart surveillancenonoyesnonono
A2P025: Other
A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nononononono
A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)nononononono
A2P026: e-Mobilitynoyesnononono
A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnononononono
A2P026: Car-free areanononononono
A2P026: Other
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesYesNoNo
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEPC = 0, energy neutral building
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoNoNo
A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
  • Smart cities strategies
  • Smart cities strategies,
  • Urban Renewal Strategies,
  • New development strategies,
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Smart cities strategies
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Smart cities strategies,
  • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyReduction of 1018000 tons CO2 by 2030Karşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030. System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023.
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
  • Biogas
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
A3P003: Other
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesDecarbonize part of Aalborg city as a way of working incrementally towards being a zero-emission city.According to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario.
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour- Stakeholder engagement; - Focus on implementing renewable energy production where possible; - Rretrofitting and energy optimization of existing buildings.
A3P006: Economic strategies
A3P006: Economic strategies
  • Life Cycle Cost,
  • Circular economy models
  • Open data business models,
  • Innovative business models,
  • Demand management Living Lab
A3P006: Other
A3P007: Social models
A3P007: Social models
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Social incentives,
  • Quality of Life
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Policy Forums,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Affordability
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
A3P007: Other
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
  • Strategic urban planning,
  • District Energy plans
  • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
  • District Energy plans,
  • SECAP Updates
  • Digital twinning and visual 3D models
A3P008: Other
A3P009: Environmental strategies
A3P009: Environmental strategies
  • Carbon-free
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Net zero carbon footprint
  • Energy Neutral
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone,
  • Pollutants Reduction
  • Energy Neutral
A3P009: Other
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsCurrent energy tariffs disincentivize both individual and collective PV systems – meaning energy communities are not economically feasible, housing associations and public buildings struggle with finding a secure RoI for solar panels, and citizens and local industry lack an incentive to install solar panels on their own
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionThe demonstration projects is a new residential development, which consists of an apartment complex which includes 39 apartments spread over 3 floors. It is a sustainble plus energy neighbouhood, and has reached a plus energy balance on its first year in operation. It has MPC controls on the individual heat pumps to improve the energy flexibility of the apartments. It includes the "social beatiful" concepts with a strong emphasis on the social sustainability of the project.The large scale provides interesting opportunities for both urban development and strategic energy planning; the diverse mix of buildings and functions also allow for interesting discussions regarding PEDs. Another interesting facet is that the district heating grid is almost fully supplied by waste heat.The pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED).ExPEDite aims at creating and deploying a novel digital twin, allowing for real-time monitoring, visualization and management of district-level energy flows. Cities consume 65% of the world’s energy supply and are responsible for 70% of the CO² emissions, hence sharing a lot of the responsibility for climate change. We are faced with the challenge of redesigning our existing cities to make them more sustainable, resilient, inclusive and safe. Developing Positive Energy Districts (PEDs), is a breakthrough way to deal with the issue of urban emissions and applying adaptation and mitigation strategies to climate change, while ensuring that these urban areas generate an annual surplus of renewable energy and net zero greenhouse gas emissions. PEDs must address environmental, economic and social issues, providing solutions to energy consumption, production, emissions, transport & mobility and livability. By constantly monitoring and evaluating parameters through existing and/or novel sensor systems (e.g., renewable energy production/supply, transport conditions, air quality, energy demand, meteorological conditions, etc.), unconventional techniques may be applied to provide more sustainable options for the district’s needs.
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentThe need for social housing and the ambition to create a great living environment with a high-performance apartment complex, supplied with renewable energy. It results in lower energy bills for the tenants and high-quality homes.The area has an interesting history of development and has recently undergone several urban improvements. This is coupled with a strong local network of business owners and other stakeholders, all with an interest in developing the area in the best way possible. This made for an interesting case from a planning perspective to investigate how this network would pick up on the concept of PED and whether they could see any potential utility in relation to their everyday experiences.Expected outcome 1 Increased number of (tangible) city planning actions for positive clean energy districts using the (proto-)PED design, development and management digital twin tools (based on pre-market research learnings) using open-standards based components which can be reused elsewhere. 2 Increased integration of existing smaller scale management systems (e.g. Building management systems) with open-standards based operational city platforms using sectorial data (e.g. building data, mobility, urban planning, etc.). 3 Enhanced data gathering approaches with identification of relevant multidimensional data sets (e.g. meteorological, load profile, social, geo-spatial, etc.) high-resolution real-time data streams (e.g. renewable energy production, energy consumption), and relevant forecasting data, drawing also on the work of common European data spaces. 4 Increased number of city planning departments / approaches using common data and (replicable) elements and processes. 5 Consolidated city sensor network specifications, complemented by appropriate data gathering approaches for soft data. 6 Improved performance of AI based self-learning systems for optimization of positive clean energy districts and bottom-up complex models. 7 Enhanced innovation capacity of local/regional administrations and accelerated uptake of shared, smart and sustainable zero emission solutions.
B1P003: Environment of the case study area
B2P003: Environment of the case study areaSuburban areaUrban areaSuburban areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban area
B1P004: Type of district
B2P004: Type of district
  • New construction
  • New construction,
  • Renovation
  • Renovation
  • New construction,
  • Renovation
  • Renovation
B1P005: Case Study Context
B1P005: Case Study Context
  • New Development
  • Re-use / Transformation Area,
  • New Development,
  • Retrofitting Area
  • Retrofitting Area
  • Re-use / Transformation Area,
  • New Development,
  • Retrofitting Area
  • Retrofitting Area
B1P006: Year of construction
B1P006: Year of construction2005
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential16.931
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P011: Population density before intervention
B1P011: Population density before intervention000000
B1P012: Population density after intervention
B1P012: Population density after intervention000000
B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
B1P013: Residentialnoyesnonoyesno
B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]102795
B1P013: Officenoyesnononono
B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Industry and Utilitynononononono
B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Commercialnononononono
B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Institutionalnononononono
B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Natural areasnononononono
B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Recreationalnononononono
B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Dismissed areasnononononono
B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Othernononononono
B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
B1P014: Residentialyesyesnonoyesno
B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]2394102795
B1P014: Officenoyesnononono
B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Industry and Utilitynononononono
B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Commercialnononononono
B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Institutionalnononononono
B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Natural areasnononononono
B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Recreationalnononononono
B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Dismissed areasnononononono
B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Othernononoyesnono
B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionAn ongoing process and dialogue with local stakeholders to determine the future development of the area.
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P002: Installation life timeNo new installation will be made throughout the project. Rather the project will attempt to establish a local PED network with the aim of empowering the stakeholders to better engage with sustainable technologies.
B2P003: Scale of action
B2P003: ScaleDistrictDistrictCampus
B2P004: Operator of the installation
B2P004: Operator of the installationKristian Olesen
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materialsReplication is primarily focused on the establishment of a local network with an interest in and understanding of PED.
B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?No
B2P006: Other
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
  • Civic
B2P007: Other
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabResearch center/University
B2P008: Other
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
  • Academia,
  • Private
B2P009: Other
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Other
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P017: Capacities
B2P017: Capacities
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P019: Available tools
B2P019: Available tools
  • Energy modelling
B2P019: Available tools
B2P020: External accessibility
B2P020: External accessibility
C1P001: Unlocking Factors
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
C1P002: Driving Factors
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P002: Economic growth need1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
C1P003: Administrative barriers
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)Delay in the Environmental Dialogue processing in the municipality
C1P004: Policy barriers
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P005: Regulatory instability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Non-effective regulations1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P006: Environmental barriers- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 - Water Scarcity: 1
C1P007: Technical barriers
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P007: Deficient planning1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
C1P008: Inertia1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Rebound effect1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
C1P010: Financial barriers
C1P010: Hidden costs1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
C1P011: Market barriers
C1P011: Split incentives1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P011: Energy price distortion1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
C1P012: Stakeholders involved
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Planning/leading
C1P012: Research & Innovation
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Financial/Funding
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
  • Planning/leading,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Business process management
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Urban Services providers
  • Planning/leading,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Real Estate developers
  • Planning/leading,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: Design/Construction companies
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
  • Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: Other
C1P012: Other (if any)
Summary

Authors (framework concept)

Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

Contributors (to the content)

Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

Implemented by

Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)