| Name | Project | Type | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|
| Örebro-Vivalla | JUST PEPP | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Tiurberget, Kongsvinger | JUST PEPP | PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
| Texel | JUST PEPP | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Hällefors, Sweden | JUST PEPP | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona | OPEN4CEC | PED Lab | Compare |
| Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab | OPEN4CEC | PED Lab | Compare |
| Pamplona | OPEN4CEC | PED Lab | Compare |
| Trondheim, Svartlamon | OPEN4CEC | PED Lab | Compare |
| Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus | OPEN4CEC | PED Lab | Compare |
| Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente | COPPER | PED Lab | Compare |
| Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) | PED StepWise | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park | PED StepWise | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten | PED StepWise | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg | HeatCOOP | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH | HeatCOOP | PED Lab | Compare |
| Tartu, Annelinn | V2G-QUESTS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Utrecht, Kanaleneiland | V2G-QUESTS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Aveiro, Aradas district | V2G-QUESTS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Győr Geothermal District Heating Project | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Lecce, SmartEnCity | SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| STARDUST, Trento | STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
| mySMARTlife, Helsinki | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Firenze, Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Sinfonia, Bolzano | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Hunziker Areal, Zürich | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Sharing Cities, Milano | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Smart Otaniemi, Espoo | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
| Zukunftsquartier, Vienna | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Barrio La Pinada, Paterna | PED Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
| Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Võru +CityxChange | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Furuset project, Oslo | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Laser Valley – Land of Lights | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Ydalir project | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Fornebu, Bærum | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Fleuraye west, Carquefou | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Smart Energy Åland | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Romania, Alba Iulia PED | ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Romania, Alba Iulia PED | InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Munich, Harthof district | PED Case Study | Uncompare | |
| Lublin | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran | CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Bærum, Eiksveien 116 | CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Findhorn, the Park | InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED | ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Umeå, Ålidhem district | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Aalborg East | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
| Ankara, Çamlık District | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Trenčín | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Luxembourg, Betzdorf | LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Vantaa, Aviapolis | NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Uncompare |
| Vidin, Himik and Bononia | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Oslo, Verksbyen | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Uden, Loopkantstraat | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Relevant Case Study | |
| Zaragoza, Actur | NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Aarhus, Brabrand | BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city | ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Izmir, District of Karşıyaka | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus | LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes | PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
| Espoo, Kera | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
| Freiburg, Waldsee | PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Graz, Reininghausgründe | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Oulu, Kaukovainio | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Halmstad, Fyllinge | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Lund, Brunnshög district | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Vienna, Am Kempelenpark | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Évora, Portugal | POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Groningen, PED South | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Lab | Compare |
| Groningen, PED North | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Lab | Compare |
| Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Lab | Compare |
| Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT | PED Lab | Compare | |
| Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district | STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Leon, Former Sugar Factory district | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Salzburg, Gneis district | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Tartu, City centre area | SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district | GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab | PED Lab | Compare | |
| Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Kifissia, Energy community | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Title | Uden, Loopkantstraat | Munich, Harthof district | Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio | Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus | Tiurberget, Kongsvinger | Vantaa, Aviapolis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||
| A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab | Uden, Loopkantstraat | Munich, Harthof district | Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio | Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus | Tiurberget, Kongsvinger | Vantaa, Aviapolis |
| A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet | ||||||
| A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet |
| |||||
| A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site | ||||||
| PED case study | no | yes | no | no | no | yes |
| PED relevant case study | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| PED Lab. | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||
| Climate neutrality | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| Annual energy surplus | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | no |
| Energy community | no | yes | yes | no | yes | no |
| Circularity | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| Air quality and urban comfort | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| Electrification | yes | no | yes | yes | no | no |
| Net-zero energy cost | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| Net-zero emission | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous) | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| Maximise self-sufficiency | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| Other | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| Other (A1P004) | almost nZEB district | |||||
| A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||
| A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED Lab | In operation | Implementation Phase | Planning Phase | Implementation Phase | Planning Phase | Planning Phase |
| A1P006: Start Date | ||||||
| A1P006: Start date | 06/17 | 01/23 | 10/24 | 01/24 | 01/23 | |
| A1P007: End Date | ||||||
| A1P007: End date | 05/23 | 12/27 | 10/28 | 12/26 | 12/27 | |
| A1P008: Reference Project | ||||||
| A1P008: Reference Project | ||||||
| A1P009: Data availability | ||||||
| A1P009: Data availability |
|
|
|
| ||
| A1P009: Other | ||||||
| A1P010: Sources | ||||||
| Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab |
|
| ||||
| A1P011: Geographic coordinates | ||||||
| X Coordinate (longitude): | 5.6191 | 11.569625059947604 | 15.394495 | 29.258300 | 12.032023 | 24.958821 |
| Y Coordinate (latitude): | 51.6606 | 48.20436261275152 | 60.486609 | 41.030600 | 60.182035 | 60.305488 |
| A1P012: Country | ||||||
| A1P012: Country | Netherlands | Germany | Sweden | Turkey | Norway | Finland |
| A1P013: City | ||||||
| A1P013: City | Uden | Munich | Borlänge | Istanbul | Kongsvinger | Vantaa |
| A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification) | ||||||
| A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification). | Cfb | Cfb | Dsb | Cfa | Dfd | Dfb |
| A1P015: District boundary | ||||||
| A1P015: District boundary | Geographic | Geographic | Geographic | Geographic | Geographic | Geographic |
| Other | ||||||
| A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab | ||||||
| A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab: | Private | Mixed | Mixed | Private | Mixed | Mixed |
| A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure | ||||||
| A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure: | Single Owner | Multiple Owners | Single Owner | Single Owner | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners |
| A1P018: Number of buildings in PED | ||||||
| A1P018: Number of buildings in PED | 1 | 126 | 10 | 15 | ||
| A1P019: Conditioned space | ||||||
| A1P019: Conditioned space [m²] | 2360 | 206 | 3700 | |||
| A1P020: Total ground area | ||||||
| A1P020: Total ground area [m²] | 3860 | 560 | 9945 | 285.400 | 3881000 | |
| A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area | ||||||
| A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| A1P022: Financial schemes | ||||||
| A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estate | yes | no | no | yes | yes | yes |
| A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | 7804440 | |||||
| A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO scheme | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Other | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural funding | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National funding | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional funding | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal funding | no | yes | no | no | no | yes |
| A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EU | no | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
| A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - National | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regional | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022: Other | Multiple different funding schemes depending on the development site within the District and Lab. | |||||
| A1P023: Economic Targets | ||||||
| A1P023: Economic Targets |
|
|
| |||
| A1P023: Other | ||||||
| A1P024: More comments: | ||||||
| A1P024: More comments: | The project is a follow-up from the “Social Beautiful” concept which was developed in collaboration between Labyrint (Support in sheltered housing), Area (housing company), the municipality of Uden, and Hendriks Coppelmans (developer). The concept aims to provide an answer to changes in various policy areas and the changing demands of society. The Social Beautiful concept consists of the following elements: 1. Living, working, and community services are brought together in one location. A multifunctional residential and service centre is being realized at the location. 2. Housing is shaped by the realization of financially accessible homes suitable for the target group. The housing design is tailored to the target group. it may also include sheltered / protected living. 3. Work takes place at the location or from the same location. The work has a social function within the neighbourhood. Wage-related work must contribute to providing structure in the daily activities of the residents. 4. Neighbourhood management is organized from the location in the surrounding neighbourhood. A service package is provided from the residential and service centre that contributes to the ability of neighbourhood residents to live independently for longer, to strengthen the social network, and to improve the quality of life and safety in the neighbourhood. 5. The houses are suitable for use at all times for regular rental. Communal facilities must be realized within the contours of a regular apartment. The objective is to offer a suitable living and working situation to a group of vulnerable citizens. In this way they become a fully-fledged part of society. They not only make use of the facilities themselves, but also give substance to the level of facilities in the municipality. Due to the integrated approach, they experience a greater sense of well-being and security. | In addition to having the most energy efficient academic building in Turkey, the university campus also has 3 buildings with LEED NC Campus certificate and LEED BD+C Gold certificate. In addition, it aims to continuously improve the energy efficiency objectives on campus in an innovative way. For this purpose, energy management and storage systems are being installed in the Dormitory 6 building, which is used as the demo area of the LEGOFIT project, for the purpose of turning it into a PED project. | ||||
| A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs | ||||||
| A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR] | 7804440 | 1 | ||||
| Contact person for general enquiries | ||||||
| A1P026: Name | Tonje Healey Trulsrud | Stefan Synek | Jingchun Shen | Cem Keskin | Johan Kask | Eira Linko |
| A1P027: Organization | Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) | City of Munich | Högskolan Dalarna | Center for Energy, Environment and Economy, Ozyegin University | CREDS—Center for Research on Digitalization and Sustainability, University of Inland Norway | City of Vantaa |
| A1P028: Affiliation | Research Center / University | Municipality / Public Bodies | Research Center / University | Research Center / University | Research Center / University | Municipality / Public Bodies |
| A1P028: Other | Andreas Bärnreuther | |||||
| A1P029: Email | tonje.h.trulsrud@ntnu.no | stefan.synek@muenchen.de | jih@du.se | cem.keskin@ozyegin.edu.tr | johan.kask@inn.no | eira.linko@vantaa.fi |
| Contact person for other special topics | ||||||
| A1P030: Name | Stefan Synek | Xingxing Zhang | M. Pınar Mengüç | |||
| A1P031: Email | stefan.synek@muenchen.de | xza@du.se | pinar.menguc@ozyegin.edu.tr | |||
| Pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| A2P001: Fields of application | ||||||
| A2P001: Fields of application |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A2P001: Other | ||||||
| A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields | ||||||
| A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields | Energy efficiency: Energy efficient envelope, with good insulation, triple glazing windows and airtight envelope. (EPC = 0) Energy Flexibility: MCP controls for the heat pump in the apartments. Energy production: PV panels on the roof, Ground source heat pumps Waste management: construction waste was kept to a minimum and sorted and collected separately as much as possible. Indoor air quality: Exhaust ventilation and opening of windows Construction materials: low carbon emission building materials | Load calculation and system optimisation: City Energy Analyst Identification of stranded assets for asset owners and investors to understand the carbon risks: CRREM | LEED NC Campus + LEGOFIT Project Energy Efficiency: Tri- generation, Compliance with ISO 50001, ASHRAE 90.1, energy efficient appliances, HVAC and lighting Energy flexibility: Energy demand management Energy production: Solar PVs Onsite + (to be installed more) E-mobility: EV Charging stations Indoor Air Quality: Energy Management System, Compliance with ASHRAE 62.1, ASHRAE 55 Construction materials: Passive systems, LEED certified buildings, innovative materials such as PCM Waste Management: Zero waste document | Pilot collaboration with landowners. Carbon footprint assessment and planning guidelines in zoning planning. Green infrastructure requirements. Examples of considered energy solutions: waste heat recovery and utilization, geothermal, air-water heat pumps, district heating return water, photovoltaics, A-class energy efficiency, smart control and monitoring, energy storages, E-mobility above national requirements, cooling | ||
| A2P003: Application of ISO52000 | ||||||
| A2P003: Application of ISO52000 | Yes | No | Yes | No | ||
| A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance | ||||||
| A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance | ||||||
| A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance | No | No | No | No | ||
| A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation | ||||||
| A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation | not included | Not included, the campus is a non car area except emergencies | The calculation of the energy balance will be further developed and specified under the Neutralpath-project. Mobility related emissions are taken into account in the carbon footprint calculation of each zoning plan in the development area. | |||
| A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand | ||||||
| A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum] | 0.148 | 0.6777 | ||||
| A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand | ||||||
| A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum] | 0.109 | 0.03656 | ||||
| A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility | ||||||
| A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum] | 0 | |||||
| A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure | ||||||
| A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum] | 0 | |||||
| A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year | ||||||
| A2P011: PV | yes | yes | no | yes | no | yes |
| A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.058 | |||||
| A2P011: Wind | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P011: Hydro | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P011: Biomass_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P011: Biomass_peat_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P011: PVT_el | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.01818 | |||||
| A2P011: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year | ||||||
| A2P012: Geothermal | yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Solar Thermal | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Biomass_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Waste heat+HP | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Biomass_peat_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: PVT_th | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.0825 | |||||
| A2P012: Biomass_firewood_th | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes | ||||||
| A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes | *Annual energy use below is presentedin primary energy consumption | |||||
| A2P014: Annual energy use | ||||||
| A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum] | 0.194 | 0.318 | 3.5 | |||
| A2P015: Annual energy delivered | ||||||
| A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum] | 0.0368 | 0.2055 | ||||
| A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year | ||||||
| A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | 0 | |||||
| A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year | ||||||
| A2P017: Gas | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P017: Coal | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P017: Oil | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P017: Other | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | 0 | |||||
| A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year | ||||||
| A2P018: PV | no | yes | no | yes | no | yes |
| A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | 0.00045547 | |||||
| A2P018: Wind | no | yes | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: Hydro | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: Biomass_el | no | yes | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: Biomass_peat_el | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: PVT_el | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: Other | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | 0.187 | |||||
| A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year | ||||||
| A2P019: Geothermal | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Solar Thermal | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Biomass_heat | no | yes | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Waste heat+HP | no | yes | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Biomass_peat_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: PVT_th | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Biomass_firewood_th | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Other | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0 | |||||
| A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary | ||||||
| A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary | 0 | 0 | 0.53839572192513 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED | ||||||
| A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum] | -0.00043 | 6.93 | ||||
| A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||
| A2P022: Safety & Security | Personal Safety | none | ||||
| A2P022: Health | Healthy community | thermal comfort diagram | ||||
| A2P022: Education | none | |||||
| A2P022: Mobility | Sustainable mobility | none | Yes | |||
| A2P022: Energy | NOn-renewable primary energy balance, renewable energy ratio, grid purchase factor, load cover factor/self-generation, supply cover factor/self-consumption, net energy/net power, peak delivered/peak expoted, total greenhouse gas emission | Energy | normalized CO2/GHG & Energy intensity | Yes | ||
| A2P022: Water | ||||||
| A2P022: Economic development | capital costs, operational cots, overall economic performance (5 KPIs) | cost of excess emissions | ||||
| A2P022: Housing and Community | demographic composition, diverse community, social cohesion | |||||
| A2P022: Waste | ||||||
| A2P022: Other | Smartness and flecibility, Indoor Environmental Quality, Social performance - Equity (affordable housing, access to servicees and amenitioes, afforability of energy, living conditions, sustinable mobility, universal design) | |||||
| A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation | ||||||
| A2P023: Photovoltaics | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| A2P023: Solar thermal collectors | no | no | yes | no | yes | no |
| A2P023: Wind Turbines | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P023: Geothermal energy system | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | yes |
| A2P023: Waste heat recovery | no | no | yes | no | yes | yes |
| A2P023: Waste to energy | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P023: Polygeneration | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P023: Co-generation | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P023: Heat Pump | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| A2P023: Hydrogen | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Hydropower plant | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Biomass | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P023: Biogas | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Other | The technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case. | |||||
| A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility | ||||||
| A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) | no | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
| A2P024: Energy management system | yes | yes | no | yes | no | yes |
| A2P024: Demand-side management | yes | no | no | yes | yes | yes |
| A2P024: Smart electricity grid | no | no | no | no | yes | yes |
| A2P024: Thermal Storage | no | yes | yes | no | yes | yes |
| A2P024: Electric Storage | no | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
| A2P024: District Heating and Cooling | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systems | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
| A2P024: P2P – buildings | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P024: Other | The technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case. | |||||
| A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency | ||||||
| A2P025: Deep Retrofitting | no | yes | yes | no | yes | no |
| A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildings | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P025: High-performance new buildings | yes | no | no | yes | no | yes |
| A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting) | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Urban data platforms | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Mobile applications for citizens | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting) | yes | no | yes | yes | no | yes |
| A2P025: Smart irrigation | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposal | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Smart surveillance | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P025: Other | The technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case. | |||||
| A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility | ||||||
| A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private) | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances) | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P026: e-Mobility | no | yes | no | yes | no | yes |
| A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutions | no | yes | no | yes | no | yes |
| A2P026: Car-free area | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P026: Other | ||||||
| A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes | ||||||
| A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes | ||||||
| A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates | ||||||
| A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | |
| A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes | EPC = 0, energy neutral building | |||||
| A2P029: Any other building / district certificates | ||||||
| A2P029: Any other building / district certificates | No | No | Yes | |||
| A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes | LEED BD+C, LEED NC CAMPUS | |||||
| A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy | ||||||
| A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy |
|
|
| |||
| A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy | ||||||
| A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy | City wide climate neutrality by 2035, city administration climate neutrality by 2030 | The study aligns closely with the decarbonisation and energy reduction pathways of residential multi family buildings with 1.5°C global warming target in Sweden. This study will also contribute to the achievement of the carbon neturality of whole Borlänge city by 2030. | Carbon-Neutral Vantaa by 2030 (min. 80 % reduction of yearly emissions, capture or compensation os the residual 20 %), | |||
| A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid | ||||||
| A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid |
|
| ||||
| A3P003: Other | Boiler Automation, Energy Management System, Electric Battery Storage, Demand Management and Flexible Pricing | |||||
| A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities | ||||||
| A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities | In our project, we carried out a comprehensive exploration of strategies to achieve positive energy districts in a Swedish residential portfolio. The focus on urban energy transitions necessitates a holistic approach that integrates building retrofit, solar technology exploration, and heating supply optimisation. Exploration of Local Solar Sources: The analysis reveals varying solar irradiance resources throughout the year, emphasizing the importance of strategic placement. Integration of combined photovoltaic and thermal panels into building envelopes demonstrates the potential to cover a significant portion of the energy demand even in Sweden. Heating Supply Optimisation with Solar Technologies: Despite the surplus energy production from on-site solar technology, challenges arise due to temporal energy asymmetry. The introduction of heat pumps emerges as a feasible solution to balance energy gaps, utilising both rejected and free heat. Optimisation scenarios, utilising a combination of geothermal heat pumps, water source heat pumps, and PVT, showcase remarkable reductions in emissions and primary energy consumption. Urban Form and Energy Infrastructure Design: We realised the importance of returning to urban form and energy infrastructure design to optimise future residential portfolio potential. Building layout design, influenced by zoning regulations and innovative typologies, plays a crucial role in achieving district level energy efficiency. Future challenges, including demographic shifts, e-mobility, and climate change, necessitate a more holistic approach to energy infrastructure design, addressing not only heating and electricity demands but also cooling requirements. | Carbon and Energy Neutrality | ||||
| A3P005: Sustainable behaviour | ||||||
| A3P005: Sustainable behaviour | While our investigation primarily centres on technical optimisation within Positive Energy District (PED) development, it is essential to acknowledge the broader scope encompassing social and governance dimensions. Specifically, understanding stakeholders' willingness to embrace technical recommendations upon project completion is important. Several potential influencing factors merit exploration, including economic considerations, technical optimisation-associated embodied carbon balance, the general public's technical perceptions, and operational feasibility. Evaluating these aspects holistically not only enhances the efficacy of PED initiatives but also fosters greater acceptance and participation within the communities they serve. | Under LEGOFIT project, promoting sustainable behavior for better occupant experience is a targeted aim under a work package. | ||||
| A3P006: Economic strategies | ||||||
| A3P006: Economic strategies |
|
|
|
| ||
| A3P006: Other | ||||||
| A3P007: Social models | ||||||
| A3P007: Social models |
|
|
|
|
| |
| A3P007: Other | ||||||
| A3P008: Integrated urban strategies | ||||||
| A3P008: Integrated urban strategies |
|
|
|
| ||
| A3P008: Other | ||||||
| A3P009: Environmental strategies | ||||||
| A3P009: Environmental strategies |
|
|
|
| ||
| A3P009: Other | ||||||
| A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects | ||||||
| A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects | decision by the Munich City Council in 2019 to become climate neutral by 2030 / 2035 | ISO 45001, ISO 14001, ISO 50001, Zero Waste Policy | ||||
| B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition | ||||||
| B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition | The demonstration projects is a new residential development, which consists of an apartment complex which includes 39 apartments spread over 3 floors. It is a sustainble plus energy neighbouhood, and has reached a plus energy balance on its first year in operation. It has MPC controls on the individual heat pumps to improve the energy flexibility of the apartments. It includes the "social beatiful" concepts with a strong emphasis on the social sustainability of the project. | Munich as demonstrator together with Lyon in ASCEND project | The Rymdgatan's Residential Portfolio in Sweden presents a compelling case study for its classification as a PED-related research, given its alignment with sustainable behaviours and overarching PED development principles as follows: Inclusivity and Social Equity: The residential portfolio situated in Rymdgatan caters primarily to a low-income community. By focusing on this demographic, the project addresses critical aspects of social equity within sustainable urban development. Ensuring access to energy-efficient housing and amenities for economically disadvantaged populations not only fosters social cohesion but also mitigates energy poverty, a pressing concern in many urban contexts. Multifamily Residential Building: The inclusion of multifamily residential buildings within the portfolio underscores a commitment to density and efficient land use, both essential components of sustainable urban design. Such developments promote resource optimisation by consolidating housing units, thereby reducing per capita energy consumption and infrastructure demands. Moreover, multifamily dwellings often facilitate community engagement and shared resource management, fostering a culture of sustainability among residents. Low Carbon Retrofitting and Transition: The overarching initiative to transition the entire Jakobsgårdarna district. The included Rymdgatan portfolio, towards low carbon retrofitting, represents a significant example of decarbonization and climate resilience. By integrating energy-efficient technologies and renewable energy solutions into existing infrastructure, the project not only reduces carbon emissions but also serves as a blueprint for revitalising old urban environments sustainably. This holistic approach to retrofitting demonstrates a systemic commitment to environmental stewardship and long-term sustainability. Climate Adaptation and Renewable Energy Integration: Despite Sweden's climatic challenges, including lower solar resources during winter months, the Rymdgatan project leverages its geographical context to optimize renewable energy utilization. Sweden's greater solar resource availability during summer and geothermal potentials complement the design's emphasis on seasonal energy planning, where surplus energy generated during peak periods can be stored or redistributed efficiently. By embracing climate-responsive design strategies, the project demonstrates resilience in the face of climate variability while harnessing renewable energy potential effectively. | The campus should be considered a PED case study due to its exemplary commitment to sustainability and energy efficiency, as evidenced by several of its buildings achieving LEED certification. This certification underscores the campus's adherence to rigorous environmental standards and its proactive steps towards reducing carbon footprints. Also, the integration of sustainable practices across the campus aligns with the PED framework, which aims to create urban areas that produce more energy than they consume. Therefore, this campus serves as a model of how educational institutions can lead the way in fostering sustainable communities and advancing the goals of PED. | Neutralpath-project is working with the cocept of PCEDs = Positive and Clean Energy Districts (energy-efficient and energy-flexible districts with net zero greenhouse gas emissions and a surplus of renewable energy). Aviapolis Climate-Neutral Lab will work with both PCED and PCED relevant cases within the district. | |
| B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development | ||||||
| B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development | The need for social housing and the ambition to create a great living environment with a high-performance apartment complex, supplied with renewable energy. It results in lower energy bills for the tenants and high-quality homes. | speed and scale of PEDs | Borlänge city has committed to become the carbon-neutral city by 2030. | The purpose of implementing the PED project on this sustainable campus, where several buildings have LEED certification, is to further enhance its energy efficiency and environmental stewardship by creating a district that generates more energy than it consumes. The initiator was motivated by the need to address climate change, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and promote renewable energy sources. Additionally, the campus's existing commitment to sustainability and the success of its LEED-certified buildings provided a strong foundation for demonstrating the feasibility and benefits of PED development, serving as a model for sustainable urban living and energy self-sufficiency. | According to Vantaa city strategy 2021-2025 Aviapolis area aims to become the greenest airport city in Europe. The district is transforming from a logistics and business focused area to a lively urban district which gives an opportunity to rethink the areas energy solutions. With Neutralpath-project Vantaa aims to support the development of the district's energy system and explore innovative, energy efficient and fossil free district energy solutions. | |
| B1P003: Environment of the case study area | ||||||
| B2P003: Environment of the case study area | Suburban area | Urban area | Urban area | Suburban area | Urban area | |
| B1P004: Type of district | ||||||
| B2P004: Type of district |
|
|
|
|
| |
| B1P005: Case Study Context | ||||||
| B1P005: Case Study Context |
|
|
|
|
| |
| B1P006: Year of construction | ||||||
| B1P006: Year of construction | 1990 | 2024 | ||||
| B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential | ||||||
| B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential | 6 | 100 | ||||
| B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential | ||||||
| B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential | 6 | 100 | ||||
| B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential | ||||||
| B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential | 6 | 9800 | ||||
| B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential | ||||||
| B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential | 6 | 9800 | ||||
| B1P011: Population density before intervention | ||||||
| B1P011: Population density before intervention | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 0 | 0 |
| B1P012: Population density after intervention | ||||||
| B1P012: Population density after intervention | 0 | 0.010714285714286 | 0.010658622423328 | 34.337771548704 | 0 | 0 |
| B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention | ||||||
| B1P013: Residential | no | yes | yes | no | no | yes |
| B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²] | 4360 | |||||
| B1P013: Office | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Industry and Utility | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Commercial | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Institutional | no | no | no | yes | no | yes |
| B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²] | 285.400 | |||||
| B1P013: Natural areas | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Recreational | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Dismissed areas | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Other | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²] | 706 | |||||
| B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention | ||||||
| B1P014: Residential | yes | yes | yes | no | no | yes |
| B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²] | 2394 | 4360 | ||||
| B1P014: Office | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Industry and Utility | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Commercial | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Institutional | no | no | no | yes | no | yes |
| B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²] | 280000 | |||||
| B1P014: Natural areas | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Recreational | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Dismissed areas | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Other | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²] | 706 | |||||
| B2P001: PED Lab concept definition | ||||||
| B2P001: PED Lab concept definition | Neutralpath-project is working with the cocept of PCEDs = Positive and Clean Energy Districts (energy-efficient and energy-flexible districts with net zero greenhouse gas emissions and a surplus of renewable energy). Aviapolis Climate-Neutral Lab will work with both PCED and PCED relevant cases within the district. | |||||
| B2P002: Installation life time | ||||||
| B2P002: Installation life time | ||||||
| B2P003: Scale of action | ||||||
| B2P003: Scale | District | |||||
| B2P004: Operator of the installation | ||||||
| B2P004: Operator of the installation | The City of Vantaa manages the lab, working closely with landowners and other stakeholders such as energy companies, solution providers, universities and citizens. | |||||
| B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials | ||||||
| B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials | ||||||
| B2P006: Circular Economy Approach | ||||||
| B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials? | ||||||
| B2P006: Other | ||||||
| B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab |
| |||||
| B2P007: Other | ||||||
| B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab | Municipality | |||||
| B2P008: Other | ||||||
| B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab |
| |||||
| B2P009: Other | ||||||
| B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities | ||||||
| B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities | ||||||
| B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P011: Other | ||||||
| B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people | ||||||
| B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people | ||||||
| B2P014: Monitoring measures | ||||||
| B2P014: Monitoring measures | ||||||
| B2P015: Key Performance indicators | ||||||
| B2P015: Key Performance indicators |
| |||||
| B2P016: Execution of operations | ||||||
| B2P016: Execution of operations | ||||||
| B2P017: Capacities | ||||||
| B2P017: Capacities | ||||||
| B2P018: Relations with stakeholders | ||||||
| B2P018: Relations with stakeholders | ||||||
| B2P019: Available tools | ||||||
| B2P019: Available tools |
| |||||
| B2P019: Available tools | ||||||
| B2P020: External accessibility | ||||||
| B2P020: External accessibility | To follow the lab and Vantaa's activities in Neutralpath, fill in the following form: https://neutralpath.eu/fi/tayta-lomake-liittyaksesi-cn-labiin/ | |||||
| C1P001: Unlocking Factors | ||||||
| C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up) | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down) | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.) | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES) | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any) | Real-estate market situation | |||||
| C1P002: Driving Factors | ||||||
| C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency) | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P002: Economic growth need | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.) | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any) | ||||||
| C1P003: Administrative barriers | ||||||
| C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P003: Lack of public participation | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos) | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any) | Delay in the Environmental Dialogue processing in the municipality | |||||
| C1P004: Policy barriers | ||||||
| C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers | ||||||
| C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P005: Regulatory instability | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P005: Non-effective regulations | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P006: Environmental barriers | ||||||
| C1P006: Environmental barriers | 2 - Slightly important | Air Quality Management Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Energy Efficiency Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Water Conservation Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Waste Management Importance Level: 4 (Important) Material Selection Importance Level: 4 (Important) Renewable Energy Integration Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Heat Island Effect Mitigation Importance Level: 4 (Important) Noise Pollution Control Importance Level: 3 (Moderately Important) | ||||
| C1P007: Technical barriers | ||||||
| C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P007: Deficient planning | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Lack of well-defined process | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers | ||||||
| C1P008: Inertia | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P008: Rebound effect | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers | ||||||
| C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P010: Financial barriers | ||||||
| C1P010: Hidden costs | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P010: Economic crisis | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P010: Risk and uncertainty | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P011: Market barriers | ||||||
| C1P011: Split incentives | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P011: Energy price distortion | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs) | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P012: Stakeholders involved | ||||||
| C1P012: Government/Public Authorities |
|
|
|
|
| |
| C1P012: Research & Innovation |
|
|
|
|
| |
| C1P012: Financial/Funding |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data |
|
|
|
| ||
| C1P012: Business process management |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: Urban Services providers |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: Real Estate developers |
|
|
|
|
| |
| C1P012: Design/Construction companies |
|
|
|
|
| |
| C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens |
|
|
|
|
| |
| C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce |
|
|
|
| ||
| C1P012: Other |
| |||||
| C1P012: Other (if any) | ||||||
| Summary |
Authors (framework concept)
Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)
Contributors (to the content)
Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)
Implemented by
Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)
