Search
Close this search box.
Search
Map View
Table View
Projects
Filters:
Clear Filters Export All Entries (CSV)
NameProjectTypeCompare
Tartu, Estonia V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, the Netherlands (District of Kanaleneiland) V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Portugal V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Uncompare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Uncompare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Uncompare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Uncompare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Uncompare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleUden, Loopkantstraat
Lublin
«×»
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab
«×»
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium
«×»
Ydalir project, Elverum
«×»
City of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block
«×»
Aalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, Denmark
«×»
Fleuraye west, Carquefou
«×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabUden, LoopkantstraatLublinBarcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLabKladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter StadiumYdalir project, ElverumCity of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva blockAalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, DenmarkFleuraye west, Carquefou
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynoyesnonoyesyesnoyes
PED relevant case studyyesnonoyesnonoyesno
PED Lab.nonoyesnononoyesno
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesnoyesyesnoyesyes
Annual energy surplusyesyesnoyesnononono
Energy communitynoyesyesyesnononono
Circularitynoyesnononononono
Air quality and urban comfortnoyesnononononono
Electrificationyesnoyesyesnononono
Net-zero energy costnoyesnononononono
Net-zero emissionnoyesyesnoyesnonoyes
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)noyesyesnonononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynoyesnononoyesyesno
Othernonoyesnoyesnonoyes
Other (A1P004)Green ITEnergy efficient; Sustainable neighbourhood; Energy neutralEnergy neutral; Energy efficient; Social aspects/affordability; Sustainable neighbourhood
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabIn operationPlanning PhaseIn operationPlanning PhaseIn operationIn operationPlanning PhaseCompleted
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date06/1701/2011202201/1606/1811/2201/13
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date05/2302/201303/2211/2531/22
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets,
  • Vehicle registration datasets
  • General statistical datasets
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • General statistical datasets
  • General statistical datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • GIS open datasets
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
  • Inger Andresen, Tonje Healey Trulsrud, Luca Finocchiaro, Alessandro Nocente, Meril Tamm, Joana Ortiz, Jaume Salom, Abel Magyari, Linda Hoes-van Oeffelen, Wouter Borsboom, Wim Kornaat, Niki Gaitani, Design and performance predictions of plus energy neighbourhoods – Case studies of demonstration projects in four different European climates, Energy and Buildings, Volume 274, 2022, 112447, ISSN 0378-7788, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112447. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778822006181),
  • Deliverable, Report: Integrated Energy Design for Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods (syn.ikia),
  • Deliverable, Report: DEMONSTRATION CASE OF SUSTAINABLE PLUS ENERGY NEIGHBOURHOODS IN MARINE CLIMATE (syn.ikia),
  • https://www.synikia.eu/no/bibliotek/
  • M. Hukkalainen, F. Zarrin, K. Klobut, O. Lindholm, M. Ranta, P. Hajduk, T. Vainio-Kaila, E. Wanne, J. Tartia, H. Horn, K. Kontu, J. Juhmen, S. Santala, R. Turtiainen, J. Töyräs, T. Koljonen. (2020). Deliverable D3.1 Detailed plan of the Espoo smart city lighthouse demonstrations. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2020-09/SPARCS_D3.1_Detailed_plan_Espoo.pdf,
  • Hukkalainen, Zarrin Fatima, Krzysztof Klobut, Kalevi Piira, Mikaela Ranta, Petr Hajduk, Tiina Vainio-Kaila , Elina Wanne, Jani Tartia, Angela Bartel, Joni Mäkinen, Mia Kaurila, Kaisa Kontu, Jaano Juhmen, Merja Ryöppy, Reetta Turtiainen, Joona Töyräs, Timo Koljonen (2021) Deliverable 3.2 Midterm report on the implemented demonstrations of solutions for energy positive blocks in Espoo. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2022-02/SPARCS_D3.2.pdf,
  • www.lippulaiva.fi
A1P011: Geographic coordinates
X Coordinate (longitude):5.619122.56842.114.0929611.58020424.654310.007-1.514197
Y Coordinate (latitude):51.660651.246541.350.1371560.89187860.149157.04102847.298564
A1P012: Country
A1P012: CountryNetherlandsPolandSpainCzech RepublicNorwayFinlandDenmarkFrance
A1P013: City
A1P013: CityUdenLublinBarcelona and TarragonaKladnoElverumEspooAalborgCarquefou
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CfbCfbCsaCfbDfbDfbDfbCfb
A1P015: District boundary
A1P015: District boundaryGeographicGeographicVirtualGeographicGeographicVirtual
OtherV1* (ca 8 buildings)
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:PrivatePrivatePublicMixedPublicPrivatePublicPublic
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Single OwnerMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersSingle Owner
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED15089
A1P019: Conditioned space
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]236021664.73112000
A1P020: Total ground area
A1P020: Total ground area [m²]386072833.4743000016500031308000
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area10000100
A1P022: Financial schemes
A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estateyesnonoyesnoyesnono
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]7804440
A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenononoyesnononono
A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernononononononono
A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnononoyesnononono
A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnononononononono
A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnononononononoyes
A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnononoyesnononono
A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernononononononono
A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnononoyesnoyesnono
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]308875
A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnononoyesnonoyesno
A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnononononononono
A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernononononononono
A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022: Other
A1P023: Economic Targets
A1P023: Economic Targets
  • Job creation,
  • Positive externalities,
  • Boosting local businesses,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production,
  • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
  • Job creation,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
  • Job creation,
  • Positive externalities
  • Job creation,
  • Positive externalities,
  • Boosting local businesses
  • Positive externalities,
  • Boosting local businesses,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
  • Boosting local businesses
A1P023: Other
A1P024: More comments:
A1P024: More comments:The project is a follow-up from the “Social Beautiful” concept which was developed in collaboration between Labyrint (Support in sheltered housing), Area (housing company), the municipality of Uden, and Hendriks Coppelmans (developer). The concept aims to provide an answer to changes in various policy areas and the changing demands of society. The Social Beautiful concept consists of the following elements: 1. Living, working, and community services are brought together in one location. A multifunctional residential and service centre is being realized at the location. 2. Housing is shaped by the realization of financially accessible homes suitable for the target group. The housing design is tailored to the target group. it may also include sheltered / protected living. 3. Work takes place at the location or from the same location. The work has a social function within the neighbourhood. Wage-related work must contribute to providing structure in the daily activities of the residents. 4. Neighbourhood management is organized from the location in the surrounding neighbourhood. A service package is provided from the residential and service centre that contributes to the ability of neighbourhood residents to live independently for longer, to strengthen the social network, and to improve the quality of life and safety in the neighbourhood. 5. The houses are suitable for use at all times for regular rental. Communal facilities must be realized within the contours of a regular apartment. The objective is to offer a suitable living and working situation to a group of vulnerable citizens. In this way they become a fully-fledged part of society. They not only make use of the facilities themselves, but also give substance to the level of facilities in the municipality. Due to the integrated approach, they experience a greater sense of well-being and security.Lublin PED Area is geographically bounded and the ambition is to reach Self-Sufficiency. There is a shopping centre with a large rooftop area for solar generation and there are also an empty lot (just on the east side of the building) and a carpark area (on the north side) next to the commercial centre. These areas can also be evaluated for on-site (on the ground – or canopies for cars) energy generation. There are also new built (mainly in 2012) residential blocks with high efficiency and this district is so-called an “eco-district”. Thanks to the District Heating Grid (DHN), all buildings are connected to each other the network has potential for sharing mechanisms in the PED Area. Another opportunity for renewable energy is that these buildings are connected to more or less the end point of DHN and for this reason, a waste heat potential from the return pipe may also be considered. There are also small size residentials, that are not connected to the DHN, around the PED area and this enlightened the technical team for exporting energy from PED to these areas with a new infrastructure.Semi-Virtual Energy Integration Laboratory (SEILAB) The Energy Smart Lab is an infrastructure conceived as a flexible and versatile platform for innovative technological developments for both industry and competitive R+D projects. The areas of expertise of this laboratory pivot around the following technologies: – Power Electronics for the integration and control of the elements within a building or community: Renewable Energy Sources (RES), Energy Storage Systems and Electric Vehicles (EV) – ICT Platform for smart communications and energy management of systems, building, networks and communities. – Energy System Integration technologies for smart and flexible buildings and grids including RES and EV. The laboratory operation is based on the hardware emulation approach, which allows for real physical equipment to be operated under a broad range of scenarios without depending on the real occurrence of the boundary conditions suitable for the experimental validation. The laboratory is pioneer in addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation.The Espoonlahti district is located on the south-western coast of Espoo. With 56,000 inhabitants, it is the second largest of the Espoo city centres. The number of inhabitants is estimated to grow to 70,000 within the next 10 years. Espoonlahti will be a future transit hub of the south-western Espoo, along the metro line, and the increasing stream of passengers provides a huge potential for retail, business and residential developments. E-mobility solutions and last-mile services have strong potential in the area when subway extension is finished and running. The extensive (re)development of the Lippulaiva blocks make a benchmark catering to the everyday needs of residents. The completely new shopping centre is a state-of-the-art cross point with 20,000 daily customers and 10,000 daily commuters (3.5 million/year). The new underground metro line and station, and feeder line bus terminal, are fully integrated. Residential housing of approximately 550 new apartments will be built on top. Lippulaiva is a large traffic hub, directly connected to public transport and right next to the Länsiväylä highway and extensive cycle paths. Lippulaiva offers diverse, mixed-use services, such as a shopping mall, public services, a day care centre, residential apartment buildings, and underground parking facilities. Lippulaiva received the LEED Gold environmental certificate and Smart Building Gold certificate. • Flagship of sustainability • Cooling and heating demand from geothermal energy system (on-site) with energy storage system, 4 MW • PV panels: roof and façade, 630 kWp • Smart control strategies for electricity and thermal energy, smart microgrid-system and battery storage • Charging capacity for 134 EVs
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]7804440
Contact person for general enquiries
A1P026: NameTonje Healey TrulsrudDorota Wolińska-PietrzakDr. Jaume Salom, Dra. Cristina CorcheroDavid ŠkorňaChristoph GollnerElina EkelundKristian OlesenChristoph Gollner
A1P027: OrganizationNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)Lublin MunicipalityIRECMěsto KladnoFFGCitycon OyjAalborg UniversityFFG
A1P028: AffiliationResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public BodiesOtherSME / IndustryResearch Center / UniversityOther
A1P028: Other
A1P029: Emailtonje.h.trulsrud@ntnu.nodwolinska@lublin.euJsalom@irec.catdavid.skorna@mestokladno.czchristoph.gollner@ffg.atElina.ekelund@citycon.comKristian@plan.aau.dkchristoph.gollner@ffg.at
Contact person for other special topics
A1P030: NameMichal KuzmičElina EkelundAlex Søgaard Moreno
A1P031: Emailmichal.kuzmic@cvut.czElina.ekelund@citycon.comasm@aalborg.dk
Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
A2P001: Fields of application
A2P001: Fields of application
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • Waste management,
  • Indoor air quality,
  • Construction materials
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
  • Digital technologies,
  • Indoor air quality
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Digital technologies
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Digital technologies,
  • Indoor air quality
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy production,
  • Construction materials
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Digital technologies
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
  • Digital technologies
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy production,
  • Digital technologies,
  • Indoor air quality
A2P001: Other
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: Energy efficient envelope, with good insulation, triple glazing windows and airtight envelope. (EPC = 0) Energy Flexibility: MCP controls for the heat pump in the apartments. Energy production: PV panels on the roof, Ground source heat pumps Waste management: construction waste was kept to a minimum and sorted and collected separately as much as possible. Indoor air quality: Exhaust ventilation and opening of windows Construction materials: low carbon emission building materialsSEE: D4.1 - Methodology and Guidelines for PED design https://makingcity.eu/results/#1551708358627-aefa76ef-66b2Energy SmartLab capacities - Building simulation model: thermal inertia and thermal loads of a building or community can be co-simulated with a building model. – System Operator and Aggregator simulation models: the interaction with remote control actions carried out by electricity System Operators or flexibility Aggregators can be simulated as well. – Grid simulation model: the physical interaction of the building with the grid power supply can be simulated enabling the experimental validation of flexibility services to the network. Energy SmartLab systems - SAFT Li-ion battery: maximum stored energy 20000 Wh, rated power 150 kW, rated discharge current 200 A, rated charge current 34 A, operating voltage 189 V – 227 V – 254 V, capacity 82 Ah. – Ultracapacitors: maximum stored energy 57 Wh, rated power 10 kW, rated current 20 A, peak current (<1s) 200 Apk, operating voltage 250 V – 500 V, capacity 1,65 F. – Electric vehicle second life battery: maximum stored energy 23300 Wh, rated power 40 kW, rated current 150 A, operating voltage 240 V – 400 V, capacity 32 Ah - 5 microgrid emulators (emulated power 5.5 kVA, max generation connected 10kVA, max consumption connected 10 kVA) - 1 grid emulator (Rated power: 200 kVA, Rated current per phase: 350 A, Rated current per neutral conductor: 35)Trnsys, PV modelling tools, CADEnergy efficiency: - eliminating waste energy utilizing smart energy system - utilizing excess heat from grocery stores Energy flexibility: - A battery energy storage system (1,5 MW/1,5MWh); Active participation in Nordpool electricity market (FCR-N) Energy production: - heating and cooling from geothermal heat pump system; 171 energy wells (over 51 km); heat capacity 4 MW - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Estimation of annual production is about 540 MWh (630 kWp) E-mobility - Installation of charging stations for electric vehicles (for 134 EVs) - e-bike services (warm storage room, charging cabinets for e-bikes) Digital technologies: - Building Analytics system by Schneider ElectricStakeholder engagement, expert energy system analysis, future scenarios
A2P003: Application of ISO52000
A2P003: Application of ISO52000YesNoNoYesNo
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesYesYesYesNo
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoYesNoNoNo
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationnot included– Electric vehicle second life battery: maximum stored energy 23300 Wh, rated power 40 kW, rated current 150 A, operating voltage 240 V – 400 V, capacity 32 AhNot yet included.Mobility is not included in the energy model.Large combined industrial, residential, and commercial area with complex flows of in- and outgoing traffic.
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]0.1481.45.5218
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.1090.35.8148
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P011: PVyesnoyesyesnoyesnono
A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.0581.10.54
A2P011: Windnonononononoyesno
A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Hydronononononononono
A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_elnononononononono
A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnononononononono
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: PVT_elnononononononono
A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Othernonononononoyesno
A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P012: Geothermalyesnonononoyesnono
A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]5
A2P012: Solar Thermalnononononononono
A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_heatnononononononono
A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Waste heat+HPnononoyesnonoyesno
A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]1.7300
A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnononononononono
A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: PVT_thnononononononono
A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnononononononono
A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Othernononononononono
A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes*Annual energy use below is presentedin primary energy consumptionWaste heat from cooling the ice rink.Very little wind production currently exists in the area. The electricity production of the waste incineration plant will be included at a later date. Aalborg East is partly a remarkable area for hosting a Portland cement factory that accounts for a substantial share of Denmark’s total CO2 emissions. In turn, it also provides waste heat to the district heating grid for all of Aalborg city and some of the smaller towns that are connected to the same DH grid.
A2P014: Annual energy use
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]0.1942.111.3620
A2P015: Annual energy delivered
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]0.03685.76399
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P017: Gasnonoyesnonononono
A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
A2P017: Coalnononononononono
A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
A2P017: Oilnononononononono
A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
A2P017: Othernonononononoyesno
A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]300
A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P018: PVnononononononono
A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Windnononononononono
A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Hydronononononononono
A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_elnononononononono
A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnononononononono
A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: PVT_elnononononononono
A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Othernononononoyesnono
A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]5.26
A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P019: Geothermalnononononononono
A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Solar Thermalnononononononono
A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_heatnononononononono
A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Waste heat+HPnononononononono
A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnononononononono
A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: PVT_thnononononononono
A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnononononononono
A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Othernononononononono
A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary000001.053231939163500
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]-0.00043-1040
A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
A2P022: Safety & SecurityPersonal Safety
A2P022: HealthHealthy community
A2P022: Education
A2P022: MobilitySustainable mobilityMode of transport; Access to public transport
A2P022: EnergyNOn-renewable primary energy balance, renewable energy ratio, grid purchase factor, load cover factor/self-generation, supply cover factor/self-consumption, net energy/net power, peak delivered/peak expoted, total greenhouse gas emissionEnergy demand (heating and hot water), Energy demand (cooling), Cooling demand, Distributin losses, PV production, RES production, OER, Primafry Non-renewable energy balance, AMR, HMR, CO2 balanceEnergy efficiency in buildings; Net energy need; Gross energy need; Total energy needOn-site energy ratio
A2P022: Water
A2P022: Economic developmentcapital costs, operational cots, overall economic performance (5 KPIs)Investment cost, Caputal cost, Operation cost, payback period, NPV, cummulated cash flow, savings, Life cycle, ROI, SROI
A2P022: Housing and Communitydemographic composition, diverse community, social cohesionDelivery and proximity to amenities
A2P022: Waste
A2P022: OtherSmartness and flecibility, Indoor Environmental Quality, Social performance - Equity (affordable housing, access to servicees and amenitioes, afforability of energy, living conditions, sustinable mobility, universal design)GHG emissions; Power/load; Life cycle cost (LCC); Demographic needs and consultation plan; Public Space
A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesyesyesyesnoyesyesyes
A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnonononoyesnoyesno
A2P023: Wind Turbinesnononononononono
A2P023: Geothermal energy systemyesnonononoyesnono
A2P023: Waste heat recoverynononoyesnoyesyesno
A2P023: Waste to energynonononononoyesno
A2P023: Polygenerationnononononononono
A2P023: Co-generationnononononononono
A2P023: Heat Pumpyesyesnoyesnonoyesno
A2P023: Hydrogennoyesnononononono
A2P023: Hydropower plantnononononononono
A2P023: Biomassnonononononoyesno
A2P023: Biogasnononononononono
A2P023: Other
A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)noyesyesyesnoyesnono
A2P024: Energy management systemyesyesyesyesnoyesyesno
A2P024: Demand-side managementyesyesnoyesnonoyesno
A2P024: Smart electricity gridnoyesyesnonoyesyesyes
A2P024: Thermal Storagenoyesnononoyesyesno
A2P024: Electric Storagenoyesyesnonoyesyesno
A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnoyesnoyesyesnoyesno
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsyesyesnoyesnonoyesno
A2P024: P2P – buildingsnononononononono
A2P024: Other
A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnoyesnoyesnonoyesno
A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnoyesnononononono
A2P025: High-performance new buildingsyesyesnononoyesnoyes
A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)noyesnononoyesnono
A2P025: Urban data platformsnoyesnoyesnononono
A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnoyesnononononono
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)yesyesyesyesnoyesnono
A2P025: Smart irrigationnononononononono
A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnononononononono
A2P025: Smart surveillancenonononononoyesno
A2P025: Other
A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)noyesyesnonononono
A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)noyesnonoyesyesnono
A2P026: e-Mobilitynoyesnononoyesnono
A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnononononononono
A2P026: Car-free areanononononononono
A2P026: OtherLocal transportation hub with direct connection to metro & bus terminal; parking spaces for 1,400 bicycles and for 1,300 cars Promoting e-Mobility: 134 charging stations, A technical reservation for expanding EV charging system 1400 bicycle racks and charging cabinets for 10 e-bicycle batteries
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesNoYesYesYes
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEPC = 0, energy neutral buildingNational standards apply.Energy Performance Certificate => Energy efficiency class B (2018 version)
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoNoYesNoYes
A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesLEED (Core & Shell, v4) GOLD certification, Smart Building certification (GOLD)300 LOGEMENTS PASSIFS CERTIFIÉS PASSIVHAUS
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
  • Smart cities strategies,
  • Urban Renewal Strategies,
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • New development strategies,
  • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Smart cities strategies,
  • New development strategies
  • Smart cities strategies,
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Smart cities strategies
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • New development strategies,
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Smart cities strategies,
  • Urban Renewal Strategies,
  • New development strategies,
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Smart cities strategies,
  • Urban Renewal Strategies
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyCarbon neutrality 2050Relevant city strategies behind PED development in Espoo include the following: - The Espoo Story: Sustainability is heavily included within the values and goals of the current Espoo city strategy, also known as the Espoo Story, running from 2021 to 2025. For example, the strategy names being a responsible pioneer as one of the main values of the city and has chosen achieving carbon neutrality by 2030 as one of the main goals of the current council term. In addition to the Espoo story, four cross-administrative development programmes act as cooperation platforms that allow the city, together with its partners, to develop innovative solutions through experiments and pilot projects in line with the Espoo Story. The Sustainable Espoo development programme is one of the four programmes, thus putting sustainability on the forefront in city development work. - EU Mission: 100 climate-neutral and smart cities by 2030: Cities selected for the Mission commit to achieving carbon-neutrality in 2030. A key tool in the Mission is the Climate City Contract. Each selected city will prepare and implement its contracts in collaboration with local businesses as well as other stakeholders and residents. - Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy: Espoo is committed to the Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy, under which the signatories commit to supporting the European Union’s 40% greenhouse gas emission reduction goal by 2030. The Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP) is a key instrument for implementing the agreement. The Action Plan outlines the key measures the city will take to achieve its carbon neutrality goal. The plan also includes a mapping of climate change risks and vulnerabilities, adaptation measures, emission calculations, emission reduction scenarios and impact estimations of measures. The SECAP of the City of Espoo is available here (only available in Finnish). - UN Sustainable development Goals: The city of Espoo has committed to becoming a forerunner and achieving the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) by 2025. The goal is to make Espoo financially, ecologically, socially, and culturally sustainable. - The Circular Cities Declaration: At the end of 2020, Espoo signed the Europe-wide circular economy commitment Circular Cities Declaration. The ten goals of the declaration promote the implementation of the city’s circular economy. - Espoo Clean Heat: Fortum and the City of Espoo are committed to producing carbon-neutral district heating in the network operating in the areas of Espoo, Kauniainen and Kirkkonummi during the 2020s. The district heating network provides heating to some 250,000 end-users in homes and offices. Coal will be completely abandoned in the production of district heating by 2025. The main targets related to PED development included in the noted city strategies are the following: - Espoo will achieve carbon neutrality by 2030. To be precise, this carbon neutrality goal is defined as an 80% emission reduction from the 1990 level by the year 2030. The remaining 20% share can be absorbed in carbon sinks or compensated by other means. - District heating in Espoo will be carbon-neutral by 2029, and coal-based production will be phased out from district heating by 2025. - Espoo aims to end the use of fossil fuels in the heating of city-owned buildings by 2025. - Quantitative goals within the Espoo SECAP report: - Espoo aims to reduce total energy consumption within the municipal sector by 7.5% by the end of 2025 in comparison to the 2015 level. The social housing company Espoon Asunnot OY aims to meet the same target. - Espoo aims to cover 10% of the energy consumption of new buildings via on-site production. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of cycling to 15% by 2024. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of public transport by 1.1% yearly. - Espoo aims to reduce the emissions of bus transport by 90% by the end of 2025, when compared to 2010 levels.Reduction of 1018000 tons CO2 by 2030
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
  • Other
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
  • Biogas
A3P003: OtherHeating Grid
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities-Allows for real physical equipment to be operated under a broad range of scenarios without depending on the real occurrence of the boundary conditions suitable for the experimental validation -Pioneer in addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation.- Citycon (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) aims to be carbon neutral in its energy use by 2030 - Lippulaiva is a unique urban centre with state-of-the-art energy concept. The centre has a smart managing system, which allows for example the temporary reduction of power used in air conditioning and charging stations when energy consumption is at its peak. In addition, a backup generator and a large electric battery will balance the operation of the electricity network. - Lippulaiva is also an important mobility hub for the people of Espoo. Espoonlahti metro station is located under the centre, and the West Metro started to operate to Espoonlahti in December 2022. Lippulaiva also has a bus terminal, which serves the metro’s feeder traffic in the Espoonlahti major district.Decarbonize part of Aalborg city as a way of working incrementally towards being a zero-emission city.
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour-Improving the development of Net Zero Energy Buildings and Flexible Energy buildings.For Citycon, it was important to engage local people within the Lippulaiva project. During the construction period as well as after opening of the shopping center, citizens have been engaged in multiple ways, such as informing local citizens of the progress of construction, engaging young people in the design processes of the shopping centre and long-term commitment of youngsters with Lippulaiva Buddy class initiative. Users’ engagement activities are conducted in close co-operation with SPARCS partners.- Stakeholder engagement; - Focus on implementing renewable energy production where possible; - Rretrofitting and energy optimization of existing buildings.
A3P006: Economic strategies
A3P006: Economic strategies
  • Demand management Living Lab
  • Innovative business models,
  • PPP models,
  • Existing incentives
  • Innovative business models
  • Life Cycle Cost,
  • Circular economy models
  • Circular economy models
A3P006: Other
A3P007: Social models
A3P007: Social models
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Social incentives,
  • Quality of Life
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
  • Digital Inclusion,
  • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Affordability
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Policy Forums,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
  • Quality of Life
A3P007: Other
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
  • City Vision 2050,
  • SECAP Updates
  • Strategic urban planning,
  • City Vision 2050,
  • SECAP Updates
  • Building / district Certification
  • Strategic urban planning,
  • District Energy plans
A3P008: Other
A3P009: Environmental strategies
A3P009: Environmental strategies
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone,
  • Net zero carbon footprint,
  • Carbon-free,
  • Life Cycle approach,
  • Greening strategies,
  • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone,
  • Pollutants Reduction,
  • Greening strategies
  • Net zero carbon footprint
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Net zero carbon footprint,
  • Carbon-free
  • Other
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Net zero carbon footprint
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Net zero carbon footprint,
  • Carbon-free
A3P009: OtherCarbon free in terms of energy
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects- European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (‘Renewable energy’ directive - 2018/2001/EU and ‘Common rules for the internal electricity market’ directive- 2019/944/EU). - Spanish building certification is regulated through Royal Decree 235/2013.- Energy efficiency regulations (Directive 2006/32/EC and 2009/72/EC) - EU directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings => all new buildings should be “nearly zero-energy buildings” (nZEB) from 2021Current energy tariffs disincentivize both individual and collective PV systems – meaning energy communities are not economically feasible, housing associations and public buildings struggle with finding a secure RoI for solar panels, and citizens and local industry lack an incentive to install solar panels on their own
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionThe demonstration projects is a new residential development, which consists of an apartment complex which includes 39 apartments spread over 3 floors. It is a sustainble plus energy neighbouhood, and has reached a plus energy balance on its first year in operation. It has MPC controls on the individual heat pumps to improve the energy flexibility of the apartments. It includes the "social beatiful" concepts with a strong emphasis on the social sustainability of the project.Onsite Energy Ratio > 1Lippulaiva is a project with high level goal in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production.The large scale provides interesting opportunities for both urban development and strategic energy planning; the diverse mix of buildings and functions also allow for interesting discussions regarding PEDs. Another interesting facet is that the district heating grid is almost fully supplied by waste heat.
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentThe need for social housing and the ambition to create a great living environment with a high-performance apartment complex, supplied with renewable energy. It results in lower energy bills for the tenants and high-quality homes.Strategic, economic- Citycon’s (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) target is to be carbon neutral by 2030 - Increasing sustainability requirements from the financing, tenants, cities, other stakeholdersThe area has an interesting history of development and has recently undergone several urban improvements. This is coupled with a strong local network of business owners and other stakeholders, all with an interest in developing the area in the best way possible. This made for an interesting case from a planning perspective to investigate how this network would pick up on the concept of PED and whether they could see any potential utility in relation to their everyday experiences.
B1P003: Environment of the case study area
B2P003: Environment of the case study areaSuburban areaUrban areaSuburban areaUrban areaSuburban area
B1P004: Type of district
B2P004: Type of district
  • New construction
  • New construction,
  • Renovation
  • New construction
  • New construction
  • Renovation
  • New construction
B1P005: Case Study Context
B1P005: Case Study Context
  • New Development
  • New Development,
  • Retrofitting Area
  • New Development
  • Re-use / Transformation Area,
  • New Development
  • Retrofitting Area
  • New Development
B1P006: Year of construction
B1P006: Year of construction2022
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential16.931
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P011: Population density before intervention
B1P011: Population density before intervention00000000
B1P012: Population density after intervention
B1P012: Population density after intervention00000000
B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
B1P013: Residentialnononoyesnononono
B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Officenononoyesnononono
B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Industry and Utilitynononononononono
B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Commercialnononononoyesnono
B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Institutionalnononononononono
B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Natural areasnononononoyesnono
B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Recreationalnononoyesnononono
B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Dismissed areasnononononononono
B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Othernononononononono
B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
B1P014: Residentialyesnonoyesyesyesnoyes
B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]2394100000
B1P014: Officenononoyesnononono
B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Industry and Utilitynononononononoyes
B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]10000
B1P014: Commercialnononononoyesnoyes
B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Institutionalnonononoyesnonono
B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]2000
B1P014: Natural areasnononononononono
B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Recreationalnononoyesnononoyes
B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Dismissed areasnononononononono
B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Othernononononononono
B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionaddressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility AggregationAn ongoing process and dialogue with local stakeholders to determine the future development of the area.
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P002: Installation life timeNo new installation will be made throughout the project. Rather the project will attempt to establish a local PED network with the aim of empowering the stakeholders to better engage with sustainable technologies.
B2P003: Scale of action
B2P003: ScaleDistrictVirtualDistrictDistrict
B2P004: Operator of the installation
B2P004: Operator of the installationIRECKristian Olesen
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materialsReplication is primarily focused on the establishment of a local network with an interest in and understanding of PED.
B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?YesNoNo
B2P006: Other
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
  • Strategic
  • Strategic,
  • Private
  • Civic
B2P007: Other
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipalityResearch center/UniversityResearch center/University
B2P008: Other
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
  • Academia,
  • Private,
  • Industrial,
  • Citizens, public, NGO
  • Academia,
  • Private
B2P009: Other
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
  • Buildings,
  • Demand-side management,
  • Prosumers,
  • Renewable generation,
  • Efficiency measures,
  • Waste management,
  • Water treatment,
  • Lighting,
  • E-mobility,
  • Green areas,
  • Circular economy models
  • Demand-side management,
  • Energy storage,
  • Energy networks,
  • Efficiency measures,
  • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)
B2P011: Other
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
  • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure
  • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
  • Tools for prototyping and modelling,
  • Tools, spaces, events for testing and validation
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P014: Monitoring measures
  • Available data
  • Equipment
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
  • Energy
  • Energy,
  • Environmental
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P017: Capacities
B2P017: Capacities- Building simulation model: thermal inertia and thermal loads of a building or community can be co-simulated with a building model. – System Operator and Aggregator simulation models: the interaction with remote control actions carried out by electricity System Operators or flexibility Aggregators can be simulated as well. – Grid simulation model: the physical interaction of the building with the grid power supply can be simulated enabling the experimental validation of flexibility services to the network.
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P019: Available tools
B2P019: Available tools
  • Energy modelling
B2P019: Available tools
B2P020: External accessibility
B2P020: External accessibility
C1P001: Unlocking Factors
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)Collaboration with the local partners
C1P002: Driving Factors
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Economic growth need1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
C1P003: Administrative barriers
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)Delay in the Environmental Dialogue processing in the municipalityFragmented financial support; lack of experimental budget for complex projects, etc.
C1P004: Policy barriers
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)Different priorities; overall problematic system od decentralization powers; non-fuctioning model of local development funding, etc.
C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Regulatory instability1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Non-effective regulations1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P007: Technical barriers
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Deficient planning1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)Inadequate regulation towards energy transition
C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
C1P008: Inertia1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Rebound effect1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
C1P010: Financial barriers
C1P010: Hidden costs1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
C1P011: Market barriers
C1P011: Split incentives1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Energy price distortion1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
C1P012: Stakeholders involved
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Planning/leading
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: Research & Innovation
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: Financial/Funding
  • None
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
  • None
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Business process management
  • None
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: Urban Services providers
  • None
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • None
C1P012: Real Estate developers
  • Planning/leading,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • None
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Design/Construction companies
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • None
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • None
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
  • None
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
  • None
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Other
  • None
C1P012: Other (if any)
Summary

Authors (framework concept)

Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

Contributors (to the content)

Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

Implemented by

Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

Join the Action

PED-EU-NET is an open, interdisciplinary and growing network welcoming academics, practitioners and relevant stakeholders to contribute to the activities of the work plan.
Join Now

COST

COST is an EU funding programme that enables researchers to set up their interdisciplinary research networks in Europe and beyond. We provide funds for organising conferences, meetings, training schools, short scientific exchanges or other networking activities in a wide range of scientific topics. By creating open spaces where people and ideas can grow, we unlock the full potential of science.

PED-EU-NET

The COST Action Positive Energy Districts European Network (PED-EU-NET) aims to mobilise researchers and other relevant stakeholders across different domains and sectors to drive the deployment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Europe through open sharing of knowledge, exchange of ideas, pooling of resources, experimentation of new methods and co-creation of novel solutions.

Action Details

Grant Holder
Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome

Start of Action: 10 September 2020
End of Action: 09 September 2024
CSO approval date: 24/03/2020

© 2021-2023 PED-EU-NET COST Action CA19126. All rights reserved.