Name | Project | Type | Compare |
---|---|---|---|
Kriegerheimstätten | PED StepWise | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Vienna/16. District | HeatCOOP | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Laxenburgerstraße AH | HeatCOOP | PED Lab | Compare |
Tartu, Estonia | V2G-QUESTS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Utrecht, the Netherlands (District of Kanaleneiland) | V2G-QUESTS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Aveiro, Portugal | V2G-QUESTS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
SmartEnCity, Lecce | SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
STARDUST, Trento | STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
mySMARTlife, Helsinki | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Sinfonia, Bolzano | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Hunziker Areal, Zürich | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Sharing Cities, Milano | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna | PED Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
Võru +CityxChange | PED Case Study | Compare | |
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
Furuset project, Oslo | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Uncompare |
Laser Valley – Land of Lights | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Ydalir project | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
Fornebu, Bærum | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
Fleuraye west, Carquefou | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Smart Energy Åland | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Romania, Alba Iulia PED | ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
Romania, Alba Iulia PED | InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study | Uncompare |
Munich, Harthof district | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Lublin | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran | CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 | CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Findhorn, the Park | InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED | ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Umeå, Ålidhem district | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study | Compare |
Aalborg East | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
Ankara, Çamlık District | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Trenčín | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Luxembourg, Betzdorf | LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Vantaa, Aviapolis | NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
Vidin, Himik and Bononia | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Oslo, Verksbyen | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
Uden, Loopkantstraat | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Relevant Case Study | |
Zaragoza, Actur | NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Aarhus, Brabrand | BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city | ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins | PED Case Study | Compare |
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study | Compare |
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus | LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Espoo, Kera | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Freiburg, Waldsee | PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district | PED Case Study | Compare |
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Graz, Reininghausgründe | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Oulu, Kaukovainio | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Halmstad, Fyllinge | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Lund, Brunnshög district | PED Case Study | Uncompare | |
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Évora, Portugal | POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
Groningen, PED South | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Lab | Compare |
Groningen, PED North | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Lab | Compare |
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Lab | Compare |
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT | PED Lab | Compare | |
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district | STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
Salzburg, Gneis district | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
Tartu, City centre area | SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district | GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab | PED Lab | Compare | |
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Uncompare |
Kifissia, Energy community | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Title | Uden, Loopkantstraat | Lund, Brunnshög district | Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium | Furuset project, Oslo | Romania, Alba Iulia PED | Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab | Uden, Loopkantstraat | Lund, Brunnshög district | Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium | Furuset project, Oslo | Romania, Alba Iulia PED | Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district |
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet | ||||||
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet |
|
|
| |||
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site | ||||||
PED case study | no | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
PED relevant case study | yes | no | yes | no | no | no |
PED Lab. | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||
Climate neutrality | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
Annual energy surplus | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | no |
Energy community | no | yes | yes | no | yes | no |
Circularity | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
Air quality and urban comfort | no | yes | no | no | yes | yes |
Electrification | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | yes |
Net-zero energy cost | no | no | no | no | no | no |
Net-zero emission | no | yes | no | yes | no | no |
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous) | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
Maximise self-sufficiency | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
Other | no | yes | no | yes | no | yes |
Other (A1P004) | Holistic approach on city planning; Minimise car traffic - walkability; Local service; Climate neutral buildings 2030; | Energy efficient; Sustainable neighbourhood; Social aspects/affordability | Net-zero emission; Annual energy surplus | |||
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED Lab | In operation | In operation | Planning Phase | In operation | Implementation Phase | Implementation Phase |
A1P006: Start Date | ||||||
A1P006: Start date | 06/17 | 2015 | 2022 | 01/24 | ||
A1P007: End Date | ||||||
A1P007: End date | 05/23 | 2040 | 12/26 | |||
A1P008: Reference Project | ||||||
A1P008: Reference Project | ||||||
A1P009: Data availability | ||||||
A1P009: Data availability |
|
| ||||
A1P009: Other | GIS open dataset is under construction | |||||
A1P010: Sources | ||||||
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab |
|
| ||||
A1P011: Geographic coordinates | ||||||
X Coordinate (longitude): | 5.6191 | 13.232469400769599 | 14.09296 | 10.896711 | 23.580112098023235 | 12.318458 |
Y Coordinate (latitude): | 51.6606 | 55.71989792207193 | 50.13715 | 59.941823 | 46.077015278680115 | 51.326492 |
A1P012: Country | ||||||
A1P012: Country | Netherlands | Sweden | Czech Republic | Norway | Romania | Germany |
A1P013: City | ||||||
A1P013: City | Uden | Lund | Kladno | Oslo | Alba Iulia | Leipzig |
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification) | ||||||
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification). | Cfb | Dfb | Cfb | Cfb | Dfb | Dfb |
A1P015: District boundary | ||||||
A1P015: District boundary | Geographic | Geographic | Geographic | Functional | Functional | |
Other | V1* (ca 8 buildings) | Geographic | Geographic | |||
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab | ||||||
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab: | Private | Public | Mixed | Mixed | Public | |
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure | ||||||
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure: | Single Owner | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | Single Owner | |
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED | ||||||
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED | 1 | 200 | 8 | 6 | 2 | |
A1P019: Conditioned space | ||||||
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²] | 2360 | 1500000 | 17000 | |||
A1P020: Total ground area | ||||||
A1P020: Total ground area [m²] | 3860 | 1500000 | 870000 | 8423.45 | 30000 | |
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area | ||||||
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
A1P022: Financial schemes | ||||||
A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estate | yes | yes | yes | no | no | no |
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | 7804440 | 99999999 | ||||
A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO scheme | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural funding | no | yes | yes | no | yes | no |
A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | 1000000 | |||||
A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National funding | no | yes | no | no | yes | no |
A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | 30000000 | |||||
A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional funding | no | yes | no | no | yes | no |
A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | 30000000 | |||||
A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal funding | no | yes | yes | no | yes | no |
A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | 180000000 | |||||
A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EU | no | yes | yes | no | no | no |
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | 2000000 | |||||
A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - National | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regional | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
A1P022: Other | ||||||
A1P023: Economic Targets | ||||||
A1P023: Economic Targets |
|
|
| |||
A1P023: Other | World class sustainable living and research environments | Boosting sustainability for public schools | Sustainable and replicable business models regarding renewable energy systems | |||
A1P024: More comments: | ||||||
A1P024: More comments: | The project is a follow-up from the “Social Beautiful” concept which was developed in collaboration between Labyrint (Support in sheltered housing), Area (housing company), the municipality of Uden, and Hendriks Coppelmans (developer). The concept aims to provide an answer to changes in various policy areas and the changing demands of society. The Social Beautiful concept consists of the following elements: 1. Living, working, and community services are brought together in one location. A multifunctional residential and service centre is being realized at the location. 2. Housing is shaped by the realization of financially accessible homes suitable for the target group. The housing design is tailored to the target group. it may also include sheltered / protected living. 3. Work takes place at the location or from the same location. The work has a social function within the neighbourhood. Wage-related work must contribute to providing structure in the daily activities of the residents. 4. Neighbourhood management is organized from the location in the surrounding neighbourhood. A service package is provided from the residential and service centre that contributes to the ability of neighbourhood residents to live independently for longer, to strengthen the social network, and to improve the quality of life and safety in the neighbourhood. 5. The houses are suitable for use at all times for regular rental. Communal facilities must be realized within the contours of a regular apartment. The objective is to offer a suitable living and working situation to a group of vulnerable citizens. In this way they become a fully-fledged part of society. They not only make use of the facilities themselves, but also give substance to the level of facilities in the municipality. Due to the integrated approach, they experience a greater sense of well-being and security. | |||||
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs | ||||||
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR] | 7804440 | 3.5 | ||||
Contact person for general enquiries | ||||||
A1P026: Name | Tonje Healey Trulsrud | Markus Paulsson | David Škorňa | Christoph Gollner | Tudor Drâmbărean | Simon Baum |
A1P027: Organization | Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) | City of Lund | Město Kladno | FFG | Municipality of Alba Iulia | CENERO Energy GmbH |
A1P028: Affiliation | Research Center / University | Municipality / Public Bodies | Municipality / Public Bodies | Other | Municipality / Public Bodies | Other |
A1P028: Other | Maria Elena Seemann | CENERO Energy GmbH | ||||
A1P029: Email | tonje.h.trulsrud@ntnu.no | markus.paulsson@lund.se | david.skorna@mestokladno.cz | christoph.gollner@ffg.at | tudor.drambarean@apulum.ro | sib@cenero.de |
Contact person for other special topics | ||||||
A1P030: Name | Eva Dalman | Michal Kuzmič | Maria-Elena Seemann | Simon Baum | ||
A1P031: Email | eva.dalman@lund.se | michal.kuzmic@cvut.cz | maria.seemann@apulum.roapul | sib@cenero.de | ||
Pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
A2P001: Fields of application | ||||||
A2P001: Fields of application |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A2P001: Other | Walkability and biking | |||||
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields | ||||||
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields | Energy efficiency: Energy efficient envelope, with good insulation, triple glazing windows and airtight envelope. (EPC = 0) Energy Flexibility: MCP controls for the heat pump in the apartments. Energy production: PV panels on the roof, Ground source heat pumps Waste management: construction waste was kept to a minimum and sorted and collected separately as much as possible. Indoor air quality: Exhaust ventilation and opening of windows Construction materials: low carbon emission building materials | LundaMaTs methodology for traffic and city planning. LundaEko - Lund's programme for ecological sustainability. Municipally owned land is sold to property developers on environmental conditions. | Trnsys, PV modelling tools, CAD | Thermal rehabilitation of the main building, and investments in the energy efficiency and consumption fields. | ||
A2P003: Application of ISO52000 | ||||||
A2P003: Application of ISO52000 | Yes | No | No | Yes | ||
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance | ||||||
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance | ||||||
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance | No | Yes | No | No | ||
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation | ||||||
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation | not included | Today electrically charged vehicles are included in the energy balance. In the future also other fuels should be included. | Not yet included. | There will be 1 EV station placed nearby the main building. This would be the link to the mobility field. | ||
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand | ||||||
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum] | 0.148 | 25 | 1.4 | 0.982 | 1.65 | |
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand | ||||||
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum] | 0.109 | 30 | 0.3 | 0.048441 | ||
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility | ||||||
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum] | 0 | |||||
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure | ||||||
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year | ||||||
A2P011: PV | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | yes |
A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.058 | 1.1 | ||||
A2P011: Wind | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P011: Hydro | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P011: Biomass_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P011: PVT_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P011: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year | ||||||
A2P012: Geothermal | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P012: Solar Thermal | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P012: Biomass_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P012: Waste heat+HP | no | yes | yes | no | no | no |
A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 200 | 1.7 | ||||
A2P012: Biomass_peat_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P012: PVT_th | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P012: Biomass_firewood_th | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P012: Other | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes | ||||||
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes | *Annual energy use below is presentedin primary energy consumption | Waste heat from cooling the ice rink. | Only PVs - 940 PVs on the main building | |||
A2P014: Annual energy use | ||||||
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum] | 0.194 | 2.1 | 0.000048441 | 2.421 | ||
A2P015: Annual energy delivered | ||||||
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum] | 0.0368 | 0.000113331 | ||||
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year | ||||||
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | 0 | |||||
A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year | ||||||
A2P017: Gas | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P017: Coal | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P017: Oil | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P017: Other | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year | ||||||
A2P018: PV | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P018: Wind | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P018: Hydro | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P018: Biomass_el | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P018: Biomass_peat_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P018: PVT_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P018: Other | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year | ||||||
A2P019: Geothermal | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P019: Solar Thermal | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P019: Biomass_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P019: Waste heat+HP | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P019: Biomass_peat_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P019: PVT_th | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P019: Biomass_firewood_th | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P019: Other | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary | ||||||
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED | ||||||
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum] | -0.00043 | -104 | ||||
A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||
A2P022: Safety & Security | Personal Safety | yes | ||||
A2P022: Health | Healthy community | yes | ||||
A2P022: Education | yes | |||||
A2P022: Mobility | Sustainable mobility | Maximum 1/3 transport with car | Mode of transport; Access to public transport | yes | ||
A2P022: Energy | NOn-renewable primary energy balance, renewable energy ratio, grid purchase factor, load cover factor/self-generation, supply cover factor/self-consumption, net energy/net power, peak delivered/peak expoted, total greenhouse gas emission | Local energy production 150% of energy need | Energy demand (heating and hot water), Energy demand (cooling), Cooling demand, Distributin losses, PV production, RES production, OER, Primafry Non-renewable energy balance, AMR, HMR, CO2 balance | Energy efficiency in buildings; Net energy need; Gross energy need; Total energy need | yes | apply |
A2P022: Water | yes | |||||
A2P022: Economic development | capital costs, operational cots, overall economic performance (5 KPIs) | Investment cost, Caputal cost, Operation cost, payback period, NPV, cummulated cash flow, savings, Life cycle, ROI, SROI | yes | |||
A2P022: Housing and Community | demographic composition, diverse community, social cohesion | 50% rental apartments and 50% owner apartments | Delivery and proximity to amenities | |||
A2P022: Waste | ||||||
A2P022: Other | Smartness and flecibility, Indoor Environmental Quality, Social performance - Equity (affordable housing, access to servicees and amenitioes, afforability of energy, living conditions, sustinable mobility, universal design) | GHG emissions; Power/load; Life cycle cost (LCC); Demographic needs and consultation plan; Public Space | ||||
A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation | ||||||
A2P023: Photovoltaics | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | no |
A2P023: Solar thermal collectors | no | yes | no | no | yes | yes |
A2P023: Wind Turbines | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
A2P023: Geothermal energy system | yes | yes | no | no | no | no |
A2P023: Waste heat recovery | no | yes | yes | no | no | no |
A2P023: Waste to energy | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P023: Polygeneration | no | yes | no | no | yes | no |
A2P023: Co-generation | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
A2P023: Heat Pump | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | yes |
A2P023: Hydrogen | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
A2P023: Hydropower plant | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P023: Biomass | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P023: Biogas | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P023: Other | ||||||
A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility | ||||||
A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) | no | yes | yes | no | yes | no |
A2P024: Energy management system | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | no |
A2P024: Demand-side management | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | no |
A2P024: Smart electricity grid | no | yes | no | no | yes | no |
A2P024: Thermal Storage | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
A2P024: Electric Storage | no | yes | no | no | yes | no |
A2P024: District Heating and Cooling | no | yes | yes | no | no | no |
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systems | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | no |
A2P024: P2P – buildings | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
A2P024: Other | ||||||
A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency | ||||||
A2P025: Deep Retrofitting | no | no | yes | no | yes | no |
A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildings | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P025: High-performance new buildings | yes | yes | no | no | no | no |
A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting) | no | yes | no | no | yes | no |
A2P025: Urban data platforms | no | yes | yes | no | yes | no |
A2P025: Mobile applications for citizens | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting) | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | no |
A2P025: Smart irrigation | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposal | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
A2P025: Smart surveillance | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P025: Other | ||||||
A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility | ||||||
A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private) | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances) | no | yes | no | no | yes | yes |
A2P026: e-Mobility | no | yes | no | no | yes | yes |
A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutions | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
A2P026: Car-free area | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
A2P026: Other | ||||||
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes | ||||||
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes | Walkability | The new mobility plan integrates the PED area | Test-Concept for bidirectional charging. | |||
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates | ||||||
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes | EPC = 0, energy neutral building | Miljöbyggnad silver/guld | National standards apply. | |||
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates | ||||||
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates | No | No | No | Yes | ||
A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes | ||||||
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy | ||||||
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy |
|
|
|
| ||
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy | ||||||
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy | City strategy: Net climate neutrality 2030 | Carbon neutrality 2050 | 40% reduction in emissions by 2030 according to the Covenant of Mayors | |||
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid | ||||||
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid |
|
|
| |||
A3P003: Other | No gas grid in Brunnshög | |||||
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities | ||||||
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities | Local waste heat is utlized to a very large extent. More local electricity production is needed. Need to minimise the use of private cars. | - Thermal rehabilitation - Heat pumps - Smart system capable o various connections and data export - Usage of the energy produced by PVs placed on 3 buildings within the PED | ||||
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour | ||||||
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour | Need to minimise the use of private cars. Need to provide efficient methods for sorce separated waste collection. | - Education - Replacement of the non-performant PVs - Professional maintenance of the PV system - Reduce of consumptions - Intelligent systems to recover heat - Intelligent system to permit the usage of domestic water from the heating system | ||||
A3P006: Economic strategies | ||||||
A3P006: Economic strategies |
|
|
|
| ||
A3P006: Other | Attractivenes | operational savings through efficiency measures | ||||
A3P007: Social models | ||||||
A3P007: Social models |
|
|
|
|
| |
A3P007: Other | ||||||
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies | ||||||
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies |
|
|
| |||
A3P008: Other | ||||||
A3P009: Environmental strategies | ||||||
A3P009: Environmental strategies |
|
|
|
|
| |
A3P009: Other | Positive Energy Balance for the demo site | |||||
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects | ||||||
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects | The municipality cannot demand a specific energy solution to private property owners. It has to be voluntary and market based solutions. | |||||
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition | ||||||
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition | The demonstration projects is a new residential development, which consists of an apartment complex which includes 39 apartments spread over 3 floors. It is a sustainble plus energy neighbouhood, and has reached a plus energy balance on its first year in operation. It has MPC controls on the individual heat pumps to improve the energy flexibility of the apartments. It includes the "social beatiful" concepts with a strong emphasis on the social sustainability of the project. | Vision: The city as a power plant. The ultimate goal is that more energy is produced within the distric boundaries than is being used (heating, electricity & mobility). Energy efficient buildings, efficient mobility, reuse of residual heat and solar electricity are the main methods. | Onsite Energy Ratio > 1 | Positive energy district | ||
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development | ||||||
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development | The need for social housing and the ambition to create a great living environment with a high-performance apartment complex, supplied with renewable energy. It results in lower energy bills for the tenants and high-quality homes. | The aim is to build a sustainable city with minimal climate impact and maximum quality of life. PED is an important step to acheive the aims of a very ambitious city development. | Strategic, economic | Creation of an area which aims to be sustainable in terms of energy sufficiency and efficiency. | ||
B1P003: Environment of the case study area | ||||||
B2P003: Environment of the case study area | Suburban area | Urban area | Urban area | Urban area | ||
B1P004: Type of district | ||||||
B2P004: Type of district |
|
|
|
|
| |
B1P005: Case Study Context | ||||||
B1P005: Case Study Context |
|
|
|
|
|
|
B1P006: Year of construction | ||||||
B1P006: Year of construction | 1976 | |||||
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential | ||||||
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential | 0 | |||||
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential | ||||||
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential | 18000 | |||||
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential | ||||||
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential | 2000 | |||||
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential | ||||||
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential | 22000 | |||||
B1P011: Population density before intervention | ||||||
B1P011: Population density before intervention | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
B1P012: Population density after intervention | ||||||
B1P012: Population density after intervention | 0 | 0.026666666666667 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention | ||||||
B1P013: Residential | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
B1P013: Office | no | yes | yes | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²] | 60000 | |||||
B1P013: Industry and Utility | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
B1P013: Commercial | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
B1P013: Institutional | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
B1P013: Natural areas | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | 2000000 | |||||
B1P013: Recreational | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
B1P013: Dismissed areas | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
B1P013: Other | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²] | Outdoor parking: 100000 | |||||
B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention | ||||||
B1P014: Residential | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | no |
B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²] | 2394 | 600000 | ||||
B1P014: Office | no | yes | yes | yes | no | no |
B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²] | 650000 | |||||
B1P014: Industry and Utility | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
B1P014: Commercial | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
B1P014: Institutional | no | yes | no | no | yes | no |
B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²] | 50000 | |||||
B1P014: Natural areas | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
B1P014: Recreational | no | yes | yes | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²] | 400000 | |||||
B1P014: Dismissed areas | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
B1P014: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition | ||||||
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition | ||||||
B2P002: Installation life time | ||||||
B2P002: Installation life time | ||||||
B2P003: Scale of action | ||||||
B2P003: Scale | ||||||
B2P004: Operator of the installation | ||||||
B2P004: Operator of the installation | ||||||
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials | ||||||
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials | ||||||
B2P006: Circular Economy Approach | ||||||
B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials? | ||||||
B2P006: Other | ||||||
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab | ||||||
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab | ||||||
B2P007: Other | ||||||
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab | ||||||
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab | ||||||
B2P008: Other | ||||||
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab | ||||||
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab | ||||||
B2P009: Other | ||||||
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities | ||||||
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities | ||||||
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab | ||||||
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab | ||||||
B2P011: Other | ||||||
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab | ||||||
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab | ||||||
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people | ||||||
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people | ||||||
B2P014: Monitoring measures | ||||||
B2P014: Monitoring measures | ||||||
B2P015: Key Performance indicators | ||||||
B2P015: Key Performance indicators | ||||||
B2P016: Execution of operations | ||||||
B2P016: Execution of operations | ||||||
B2P017: Capacities | ||||||
B2P017: Capacities | ||||||
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders | ||||||
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders | ||||||
B2P019: Available tools | ||||||
B2P019: Available tools | ||||||
B2P019: Available tools | ||||||
B2P020: External accessibility | ||||||
B2P020: External accessibility | ||||||
C1P001: Unlocking Factors | ||||||
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | |
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up) | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down) | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.) | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | |
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | |
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES) | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | |
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any) | Collaboration with the local partners | |||||
C1P002: Driving Factors | ||||||
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | |
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency) | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | |
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | |
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P002: Economic growth need | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.) | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | |
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | |
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any) | ||||||
C1P003: Administrative barriers | ||||||
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P003: Lack of public participation | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | |
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | |
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos) | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any) | Delay in the Environmental Dialogue processing in the municipality | Fragmented financial support; lack of experimental budget for complex projects, etc. | ||||
C1P004: Policy barriers | ||||||
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any) | Different priorities; overall problematic system od decentralization powers; non-fuctioning model of local development funding, etc. | |||||
C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers | ||||||
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P005: Regulatory instability | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P005: Non-effective regulations | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
C1P006: Environmental barriers | ||||||
C1P006: Environmental barriers | ? | |||||
C1P007: Technical barriers | ||||||
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P007: Deficient planning | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any) | Inadequate regulation towards energy transition | |||||
C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers | ||||||
C1P008: Inertia | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P008: Rebound effect | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers | ||||||
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | |
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
C1P010: Financial barriers | ||||||
C1P010: Hidden costs | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | |
C1P010: Economic crisis | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
C1P011: Market barriers | ||||||
C1P011: Split incentives | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P011: Energy price distortion | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs) | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
C1P012: Stakeholders involved | ||||||
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities |
|
|
|
| ||
C1P012: Research & Innovation |
|
|
| |||
C1P012: Financial/Funding |
| |||||
C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data |
| |||||
C1P012: Business process management |
| |||||
C1P012: Urban Services providers |
|
| ||||
C1P012: Real Estate developers |
|
|
| |||
C1P012: Design/Construction companies |
|
| ||||
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens |
|
|
| |||
C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs |
| |||||
C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce |
| |||||
C1P012: Other | ||||||
C1P012: Other (if any) | ||||||
Summary |
Authors (framework concept)
Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)
Contributors (to the content)
Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)
Implemented by
Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)