Search
Close this search box.
Search
Map View
Table View
Projects
Filters:
Clear Filters Export All Entries (CSV)
NameProjectTypeCompare
Örebro-Vivalla JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Texel JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hällefors, Sweden JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Uncompare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lecce, SmartEnCity SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Firenze, Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Uncompare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Uncompare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Uncompare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleUden, Loopkantstraat
Évora, Portugal
«×»
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka
«×»
Trondheim, Svartlamon
«×»
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city
«×»
Findhorn, the Park
«×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabUden, LoopkantstraatÉvora, PortugalIzmir, District of KarşıyakaTrondheim, SvartlamonRiga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student cityFindhorn, the Park
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynonoyesnoyesyes
PED relevant case studyyesyesnononono
PED Lab.noyesnoyesnono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesnoyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusyesyesyesnonoyes
Energy communitynoyesnoyesyesyes
Circularitynononononoyes
Air quality and urban comfortnonoyesnonono
Electrificationyesnonononoyes
Net-zero energy costnonoyesnonono
Net-zero emissionnononononoyes
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nonononoyesno
Maximise self-sufficiencynonoyesnoyesyes
Othernononononono
Other (A1P004)
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabIn operationImplementation PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhaseIn operation
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date06/1710/1910/2211/2401/2401/62
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date05/2309/2410/2503/2612/26
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data
A1P009: OtherOther
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
  • Inger Andresen, Tonje Healey Trulsrud, Luca Finocchiaro, Alessandro Nocente, Meril Tamm, Joana Ortiz, Jaume Salom, Abel Magyari, Linda Hoes-van Oeffelen, Wouter Borsboom, Wim Kornaat, Niki Gaitani, Design and performance predictions of plus energy neighbourhoods – Case studies of demonstration projects in four different European climates, Energy and Buildings, Volume 274, 2022, 112447, ISSN 0378-7788, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112447. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778822006181),
  • Deliverable, Report: Integrated Energy Design for Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods (syn.ikia),
  • Deliverable, Report: DEMONSTRATION CASE OF SUSTAINABLE PLUS ENERGY NEIGHBOURHOODS IN MARINE CLIMATE (syn.ikia),
  • https://www.synikia.eu/no/bibliotek/
      A1P011: Geographic coordinates
      X Coordinate (longitude):5.6191-7.90937727.11004910.4224.08168339-3.6099
      Y Coordinate (latitude):51.660638.57080438.49605463.436356.9524595657.6530
      A1P012: Country
      A1P012: CountryNetherlandsPortugalTurkeyNorwayLatviaUnited Kingdom
      A1P013: City
      A1P013: CityUdenÉvoraİzmirTrondheimRigaFindhorn
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CfbCsaCsaCfbCfbDwc
      A1P015: District boundary
      A1P015: District boundaryGeographicGeographicGeographicVirtualGeographicGeographic
      Other
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:PrivateMixedPrivatePrivatePublicMixed
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Single OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple Owners
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED12115160
      A1P019: Conditioned space
      A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]2360102795170000
      A1P020: Total ground area
      A1P020: Total ground area [m²]3860326003200119264180000
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area103010
      A1P022: Financial schemes
      A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estateyesnonononoyes
      A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]7804440
      A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenononononono
      A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernononononono
      A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnononononono
      A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnononoyesnoyes
      A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnononononono
      A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnononononono
      A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernononononono
      A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnoyesyesnoyesyes
      A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]1999827511933557500000
      A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonoyesnonono
      A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnononononono
      A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernononononono
      A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022: Other
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      • Boosting local businesses,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      A1P023: Other
      A1P024: More comments:
      A1P024: More comments:The project is a follow-up from the “Social Beautiful” concept which was developed in collaboration between Labyrint (Support in sheltered housing), Area (housing company), the municipality of Uden, and Hendriks Coppelmans (developer). The concept aims to provide an answer to changes in various policy areas and the changing demands of society. The Social Beautiful concept consists of the following elements: 1. Living, working, and community services are brought together in one location. A multifunctional residential and service centre is being realized at the location. 2. Housing is shaped by the realization of financially accessible homes suitable for the target group. The housing design is tailored to the target group. it may also include sheltered / protected living. 3. Work takes place at the location or from the same location. The work has a social function within the neighbourhood. Wage-related work must contribute to providing structure in the daily activities of the residents. 4. Neighbourhood management is organized from the location in the surrounding neighbourhood. A service package is provided from the residential and service centre that contributes to the ability of neighbourhood residents to live independently for longer, to strengthen the social network, and to improve the quality of life and safety in the neighbourhood. 5. The houses are suitable for use at all times for regular rental. Communal facilities must be realized within the contours of a regular apartment. The objective is to offer a suitable living and working situation to a group of vulnerable citizens. In this way they become a fully-fledged part of society. They not only make use of the facilities themselves, but also give substance to the level of facilities in the municipality. Due to the integrated approach, they experience a greater sense of well-being and security.
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]78044400.02
      Contact person for general enquiries
      A1P026: NameTonje Healey TrulsrudJoão Bravo DiasOzlem SenyolTatiana González Grandón; Raymundo E. Torres-OlguinJudith StiekemaStefano Nebiolo
      A1P027: OrganizationNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)EDP LabelecKarsiyaka MunicipalityNTNUOASCFindhorn Innovation Research and Education CIC
      A1P028: AffiliationResearch Center / UniversitySME / IndustryMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityOtherResearch Center / University
      A1P028: Othernot for profit private organisation
      A1P029: Emailtonje.h.trulsrud@ntnu.nojoao.bravodias@edp.ptozlemkocaer2@gmail.comtatiana.c.g.grandon@ntnu.nojudith@oascities.orgstefanonebiolo@gmail.com
      Contact person for other special topics
      A1P030: NameHasan Burak CavkaRaymundo E. Torres-Olguin
      A1P031: Emailhasancavka@iyte.edu.trraymundo.torres-olguin@sintef.no
      Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYes
      A2P001: Fields of application
      A2P001: Fields of application
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • Waste management,
      • Indoor air quality,
      • Construction materials
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies,
      • Waste management,
      • Construction materials
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.)
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Digital technologies
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Waste management
      A2P001: Other
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: Energy efficient envelope, with good insulation, triple glazing windows and airtight envelope. (EPC = 0) Energy Flexibility: MCP controls for the heat pump in the apartments. Energy production: PV panels on the roof, Ground source heat pumps Waste management: construction waste was kept to a minimum and sorted and collected separately as much as possible. Indoor air quality: Exhaust ventilation and opening of windows Construction materials: low carbon emission building materialsMethods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4). In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED.A suite of replicable modeling tools will enable stakeholders to analyze planning actions towards positive energy in a cost-effective fashion, aiding their evidence based decision-making process. The tools will be able to model the district’s energy production and demand, optimize for flexibility and simulate mobility and transport. By employing gamification and co-creation approaches, the project will enhance public awareness and engagement in energy efficiency. The project will culminate in the publication of practical guidelines, reusable models, algorithms, and training materials to aid other cities to replicate the digital twin for their districts, fostering widespread adoption of sustainable energy practices.
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000YesNoYesNo
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesYesYes
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesNoYes
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationnot includedMobility is not included in the calculations.The university operates a fleet of 13 electric vehicles (EV) (61kW power each). There are 5 EV charging stations on campus.
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]0.1483.862148000
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.1091.2269050001.2
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]0
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]9
      A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P011: PVyesnoyesnonoyes
      A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.0581.028
      A2P011: Windnonononoyesyes
      A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Hydronononononono
      A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_elnononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: PVT_elnonononoyesno
      A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Othernononononono
      A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P012: Geothermalyesnonononono
      A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Solar Thermalnononononoyes
      A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_heatnonononoyesyes
      A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Waste heat+HPnononononoyes
      A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: PVT_thnononononono
      A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnononononoyes
      A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Othernononononono
      A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes*Annual energy use below is presentedin primary energy consumptionConventional power generation: The university’s heat supply is designed as a local centralized heat supply system. Electrical power, generated in combined heat and power (CHP) units, is delivered to the distribution network and sold to energy traders as regulated by local legislation and norms. There are two natural gas burners acting as heat sources (3MW and 6MW capacity), and two CHP units (1.6MW and 0.45MW thermal capacity). All heating is supplied from the CHP plants. Renewable Energy Sources (RES): a wind turbine (3.6 kW) and PV panels (11.7 kW) are connected to the faculty microgrid. In the future it is planned to power the campus entirely from local RES.3x225 kW wind turbines + 100 kW PV
      A2P014: Annual energy use
      A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]0.1945.0881.2
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]0.03681.2
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
      A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P017: Gasnonoyesnoyesno
      A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Coalnononononono
      A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Oilnononononono
      A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Othernononononono
      A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P018: PVnonoyesnonono
      A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.707
      A2P018: Windnononononono
      A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Hydronononononono
      A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_elnononononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnononononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: PVT_elnononononono
      A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Othernononononono
      A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P019: Geothermalnononononono
      A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Solar Thermalnononononono
      A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_heatnononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Waste heat+HPnononononono
      A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: PVT_thnononononono
      A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Othernononononono
      A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary001.4540311173975000
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]-0.00043
      A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
      A2P022: Safety & SecurityPersonal Safety
      A2P022: HealthHealthy community
      A2P022: Education
      A2P022: MobilitySustainable mobility
      A2P022: EnergyNOn-renewable primary energy balance, renewable energy ratio, grid purchase factor, load cover factor/self-generation, supply cover factor/self-consumption, net energy/net power, peak delivered/peak expoted, total greenhouse gas emissionYes
      A2P022: Water
      A2P022: Economic developmentcapital costs, operational cots, overall economic performance (5 KPIs)
      A2P022: Housing and Communitydemographic composition, diverse community, social cohesion
      A2P022: Waste
      A2P022: OtherSmartness and flecibility, Indoor Environmental Quality, Social performance - Equity (affordable housing, access to servicees and amenitioes, afforability of energy, living conditions, sustinable mobility, universal design)
      A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
      A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesyesyesyesnoyes
      A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnoyesnononoyes
      A2P023: Wind Turbinesnononononoyes
      A2P023: Geothermal energy systemyesnonononono
      A2P023: Waste heat recoverynononononoyes
      A2P023: Waste to energynononononono
      A2P023: Polygenerationnononononono
      A2P023: Co-generationnononononono
      A2P023: Heat Pumpyesnoyesnonoyes
      A2P023: Hydrogennononononono
      A2P023: Hydropower plantnononononono
      A2P023: Biomassnononononoyes
      A2P023: Biogasnononononono
      A2P023: OtherBatteries
      A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
      A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)noyesnoyesyesno
      A2P024: Energy management systemyesyesnoyesyesyes
      A2P024: Demand-side managementyesnononoyesno
      A2P024: Smart electricity gridnoyesnonoyesno
      A2P024: Thermal Storagenoyesnonoyesyes
      A2P024: Electric Storagenoyesnonoyesyes
      A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnonononoyesyes
      A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsyesyesnonoyesno
      A2P024: P2P – buildingsnoyesnoyesnono
      A2P024: Other
      A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
      A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnonoyesnonono
      A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnoyesnononono
      A2P025: High-performance new buildingsyesnonononoyes
      A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)nononoyesnono
      A2P025: Urban data platformsnoyesnoyesyesno
      A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnoyesnonoyesno
      A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)yesyesyesnoyesno
      A2P025: Smart irrigationnononononono
      A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnoyesnononono
      A2P025: Smart surveillancenoyesnononono
      A2P025: Other
      A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
      A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nononononono
      A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)nononononono
      A2P026: e-Mobilitynoyesnononoyes
      A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnoyesnononono
      A2P026: Car-free areanononononono
      A2P026: Other
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesNoNoNo
      A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEPC = 0, energy neutral building
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoNoNo
      A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Smart cities strategies,
      • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyKarşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030. System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023.
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
      A3P003: Other
      A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
      A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesAccording to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario.
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      • Local trading,
      • Existing incentives
      • Open data business models,
      • Innovative business models,
      • Demand management Living Lab
      A3P006: Other
      A3P007: Social models
      A3P007: Social models
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Social incentives,
      • Quality of Life
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Affordability
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Quality of Life
      A3P007: Other
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
      • District Energy plans,
      • SECAP Updates
      • Digital twinning and visual 3D models
      A3P008: Other
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Pollutants Reduction
      • Low Emission Zone
      • Energy Neutral
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Net zero carbon footprint
      A3P009: Other
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionThe demonstration projects is a new residential development, which consists of an apartment complex which includes 39 apartments spread over 3 floors. It is a sustainble plus energy neighbouhood, and has reached a plus energy balance on its first year in operation. It has MPC controls on the individual heat pumps to improve the energy flexibility of the apartments. It includes the "social beatiful" concepts with a strong emphasis on the social sustainability of the project.The PED main objective is to achieve the energy transition while preserving cultural heritage and improving citizen’s quality of life.The pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED).ExPEDite aims at creating and deploying a novel digital twin, allowing for real-time monitoring, visualization and management of district-level energy flows. Cities consume 65% of the world’s energy supply and are responsible for 70% of the CO² emissions, hence sharing a lot of the responsibility for climate change. We are faced with the challenge of redesigning our existing cities to make them more sustainable, resilient, inclusive and safe. Developing Positive Energy Districts (PEDs), is a breakthrough way to deal with the issue of urban emissions and applying adaptation and mitigation strategies to climate change, while ensuring that these urban areas generate an annual surplus of renewable energy and net zero greenhouse gas emissions. PEDs must address environmental, economic and social issues, providing solutions to energy consumption, production, emissions, transport & mobility and livability. By constantly monitoring and evaluating parameters through existing and/or novel sensor systems (e.g., renewable energy production/supply, transport conditions, air quality, energy demand, meteorological conditions, etc.), unconventional techniques may be applied to provide more sustainable options for the district’s needs.
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentThe need for social housing and the ambition to create a great living environment with a high-performance apartment complex, supplied with renewable energy. It results in lower energy bills for the tenants and high-quality homes.POCITYF brings together eight cities (Lightouse and Fellow cities), all having cultural heritage areas in their territory. All are intrinsically motivated to participate in the necessary energy transition not only for their conventional city districts of mixed-used, but also for districts with individually specificities as those belonging in their cultural heritage, which at the moment may be acting as barriers for their further environmental sustainability, but after POCITYF will be acting as a promising building retrofits roadmap for similar and other EU cities.Expected outcome 1 Increased number of (tangible) city planning actions for positive clean energy districts using the (proto-)PED design, development and management digital twin tools (based on pre-market research learnings) using open-standards based components which can be reused elsewhere. 2 Increased integration of existing smaller scale management systems (e.g. Building management systems) with open-standards based operational city platforms using sectorial data (e.g. building data, mobility, urban planning, etc.). 3 Enhanced data gathering approaches with identification of relevant multidimensional data sets (e.g. meteorological, load profile, social, geo-spatial, etc.) high-resolution real-time data streams (e.g. renewable energy production, energy consumption), and relevant forecasting data, drawing also on the work of common European data spaces. 4 Increased number of city planning departments / approaches using common data and (replicable) elements and processes. 5 Consolidated city sensor network specifications, complemented by appropriate data gathering approaches for soft data. 6 Improved performance of AI based self-learning systems for optimization of positive clean energy districts and bottom-up complex models. 7 Enhanced innovation capacity of local/regional administrations and accelerated uptake of shared, smart and sustainable zero emission solutions.
      B1P003: Environment of the case study area
      B2P003: Environment of the case study areaSuburban areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban areaRural
      B1P004: Type of district
      B2P004: Type of district
      • New construction
      • Renovation
      • Renovation
      • New construction
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      • New Development
      • Preservation Area
      • Retrofitting Area
      • New Development
      B1P006: Year of construction
      B1P006: Year of construction2005
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
      B1P011: Population density before intervention
      B1P011: Population density before intervention000000
      B1P012: Population density after intervention
      B1P012: Population density after intervention000000
      B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
      B1P013: Residentialnonoyesnonono
      B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]102795
      B1P013: Officenononononono
      B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Industry and Utilitynononononono
      B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Commercialnononononono
      B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Institutionalnononononono
      B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Natural areasnononononoyes
      B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Recreationalnononononono
      B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Dismissed areasnononononono
      B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Othernononononono
      B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
      B1P014: Residentialyesnoyesnonoyes
      B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]2394102795
      B1P014: Officenononononoyes
      B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Industry and Utilitynononononono
      B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Commercialnononononono
      B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Institutionalnononononono
      B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Natural areasnononononoyes
      B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Recreationalnononononono
      B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Dismissed areasnononononono
      B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Othernononononono
      B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
      B2P002: Installation life time
      B2P002: Installation life time
      B2P003: Scale of action
      B2P003: ScaleDistrict
      B2P004: Operator of the installation
      B2P004: Operator of the installation
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
      B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
      B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?
      B2P006: Other
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      B2P007: Other
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
      B2P008: Other
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      B2P009: Other
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      • Buildings,
      • Demand-side management,
      • Prosumers,
      • Renewable generation,
      • Energy storage,
      • Energy networks,
      • Waste management,
      • E-mobility,
      • Social interactions,
      • Circular economy models
      B2P011: Other
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
      • Tools for prototyping and modelling,
      • Tools, spaces, events for testing and validation
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      • Energy
      B2P016: Execution of operations
      B2P016: Execution of operations
      B2P017: Capacities
      B2P017: Capacities
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P020: External accessibility
      B2P020: External accessibility
      C1P001: Unlocking Factors
      C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
      C1P002: Driving Factors
      C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Economic growth need1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
      C1P003: Administrative barriers
      C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)Delay in the Environmental Dialogue processing in the municipality
      C1P004: Policy barriers
      C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
      C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
      C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Regulatory instability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Non-effective regulations1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
      C1P006: Environmental barriers
      C1P006: Environmental barriers- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 - Water Scarcity: 1
      C1P007: Technical barriers
      C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Deficient planning1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Lack of well-defined process1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
      C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
      C1P008: Inertia1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Rebound effect1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
      C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
      C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
      C1P010: Financial barriers
      C1P010: Hidden costs1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Risk and uncertainty5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
      C1P011: Market barriers
      C1P011: Split incentives1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Energy price distortion1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
      C1P012: Stakeholders involved
      C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Planning/leading
      C1P012: Research & Innovation
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Financial/Funding
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
      • Planning/leading,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Business process management
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Urban Services providers
      • Planning/leading,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Real Estate developers
      • Planning/leading,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: Design/Construction companies
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Design/demand aggregation
      C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
      • Design/demand aggregation
      C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: Other
      C1P012: Other (if any)
      Summary

      Authors (framework concept)

      Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

      Contributors (to the content)

      Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

      Implemented by

      Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
      Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

      Join the Action

      PED-EU-NET is an open, interdisciplinary and growing network welcoming academics, practitioners and relevant stakeholders to contribute to the activities of the work plan.
      Join Now

      COST

      COST is an EU funding programme that enables researchers to set up their interdisciplinary research networks in Europe and beyond. We provide funds for organising conferences, meetings, training schools, short scientific exchanges or other networking activities in a wide range of scientific topics. By creating open spaces where people and ideas can grow, we unlock the full potential of science.

      PED-EU-NET

      The COST Action Positive Energy Districts European Network (PED-EU-NET) aims to mobilise researchers and other relevant stakeholders across different domains and sectors to drive the deployment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Europe through open sharing of knowledge, exchange of ideas, pooling of resources, experimentation of new methods and co-creation of novel solutions.

      Action Details

      Grant Holder
      Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome

      Start of Action: 10 September 2020
      End of Action: 09 September 2024
      CSO approval date: 24/03/2020

      © 2021-2023 PED-EU-NET COST Action CA19126. All rights reserved.