| Name | Project | Type | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winterthur, WinLab | PERSIST | PED Lab | Compare |
| Luzern Living Lab, Wesemlin-Dreilinden | PERSIST | PED Lab | Compare |
| Iruña-Pamplona, Rochapea, Navarra | PERSIST | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Hradec Králové, Kukleny | RESPED – Enabling Energy Resilience through new energy flexible and affordable PED concepts | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Thessaloniki, Residential buildings | FLEdge | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Kavala, Offices in University premises | FLEdge | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Sofia, Offices and Premises in university | FLEdge | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| The city of Carcavelos, Portugal | CSP – Cascais Smart Pole | PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
| Verdal Kommune, Trøndelag | PERSIST | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Cluj-Napoca, UTCN Dormitories | PERSIST | PED Lab | Compare |
| Alba Iulia, Social blocks, str. Marcus Aurelius | PERSIST | PED Lab | Compare |
| Leeuwarden/de Zwette | PED Lab | Compare | |
| Örebro-Vivalla | JUST PEPP | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Tiurberget, Kongsvinger | JUST PEPP | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Texel | JUST PEPP | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Hällefors, Sweden | JUST PEPP | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona | OPEN4CEC | PED Lab | Compare |
| Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab | OPEN4CEC | PED Lab | Compare |
| Pamplona | OPEN4CEC | PED Lab | Compare |
| Trondheim, Svartlamon | OPEN4CEC | PED Lab | Compare |
| Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus | OPEN4CEC | PED Lab | Compare |
| Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente | COPPER | PED Lab | Compare |
| Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) | PED StepWise | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park | PED StepWise | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten | PED StepWise | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg | HeatCOOP | PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
| Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH | HeatCOOP | PED Lab | Compare |
| Tartu, Annelinn | V2G-QUESTS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Utrecht, Kanaleneiland | V2G-QUESTS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Aveiro, Aradas district | V2G-QUESTS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Győr, Geothermal District Heating Project | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Drammen, Jacobs Borchs Gate | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Freiburg im Breisgau, Dietenbach | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Lecce, SmartEnCity | SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Trento, STARDUST | STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Malmö, Klimatkontrakt Hyllie | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Kaiserslautern, EnStadt:Pfaff | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
| Helsinki, mySMARTlife | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Firenze, Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Bolzano, Sinfonia | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Zürich, Hunziker Areal | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Hammarby Sjöstad, Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0 | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Milano, Sharing Cities | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Mieres, District Heating Pozo Barredo | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Lund, Cityfied (demo Linero) | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Espoo, Smart Otaniemi | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
| Vienna, Zukunftsquartier | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Trento, Santa Chiara Open Lab | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Paterna, Barrio La Pinada | PED Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
| Bergen, Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Võru, +CityxChange | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Trondheim, NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Oslo, Furuset project | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Măgurele, Laser Valley – Land of Lights | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Elverum, Ydalir project | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Bodø, Airport, NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Bærum, Fornebu | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Carquefou, Fleuraye west | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Åland, Smart Energy | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Romania, Alba Iulia PED | ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Romania, Alba Iulia PED | InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Munich, Harthof district | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Lublin | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran | CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Bærum, Eiksveien 116 | CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Findhorn, the Park | InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED | ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Umeå, Ålidhem district | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Aalborg East | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
| Ankara, Çamlık District | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Trenčín | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Luxembourg, Betzdorf | LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Vantaa, Aviapolis | NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Vidin, Himik and Bononia | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Oslo, Verksbyen | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Uden, Loopkantstraat | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Relevant Case Study | |
| Zaragoza, Actur | NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Aarhus, Brabrand | BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city | ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Izmir, District of Karşıyaka | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus | LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes | PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
| Espoo, Kera | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Freiburg, Waldsee | PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Graz, Reininghausgründe | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Oulu, Kaukovainio | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Halmstad, Fyllinge | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
| Lund, Brunnshög district | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Vienna, Am Kempelenpark | PED Case Study | Compare | |
| Évora, Portugal | POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Groningen, PED South | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Lab | Compare |
| Groningen, PED North | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Lab | Compare |
| Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Lab | Uncompare |
| Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT | PED Lab | Compare | |
| Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district | STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Leon, Former Sugar Factory district | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Uncompare |
| Salzburg, Gneis district | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Tartu, City centre area | SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
| Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district | GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab | PED Lab | Compare | |
| Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
| Kifissia, Energy community | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
| Title | Uden, Loopkantstraat | City of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block | Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus | Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing | Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg | The city of Carcavelos, Portugal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||
| A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab | Uden, Loopkantstraat | City of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block | Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus | Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing | Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg | The city of Carcavelos, Portugal |
| A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet | ||||||
| A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet |
|
|
| |||
| A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site | ||||||
| PED case study | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| PED relevant case study | yes | no | yes | no | yes | yes |
| PED Lab. | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||
| Climate neutrality | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| Annual energy surplus | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
| Energy community | no | no | no | no | yes | yes |
| Circularity | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| Air quality and urban comfort | no | no | yes | no | no | yes |
| Electrification | yes | no | yes | no | no | no |
| Net-zero energy cost | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| Net-zero emission | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous) | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| Maximise self-sufficiency | no | yes | no | yes | no | no |
| Other | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| Other (A1P004) | almost nZEB district | |||||
| A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||
| A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED Lab | In operation | In operation | Implementation Phase | Planning Phase | Planning Phase | Completed |
| A1P006: Start Date | ||||||
| A1P006: Start date | 06/17 | 06/18 | 10/24 | 10/21 | 03/24 | 04/20 |
| A1P007: End Date | ||||||
| A1P007: End date | 05/23 | 03/22 | 10/28 | 10/24 | 12/27 | 04/24 |
| A1P008: Reference Project | ||||||
| A1P008: Reference Project | ||||||
| A1P009: Data availability | ||||||
| A1P009: Data availability |
|
|
|
| ||
| A1P009: Other | ||||||
| A1P010: Sources | ||||||
| Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab |
|
| ||||
| A1P011: Geographic coordinates | ||||||
| X Coordinate (longitude): | 5.6191 | 24.6543 | 29.258300 | -8.373557 | 16.303112 | -9.323445 |
| Y Coordinate (latitude): | 51.6606 | 60.1491 | 41.030600 | 41.135804 | 48.218501 | 38.684036 |
| A1P012: Country | ||||||
| A1P012: Country | Netherlands | Finland | Turkey | Portugal | Austria | Portugal |
| A1P013: City | ||||||
| A1P013: City | Uden | Espoo | Istanbul | Maia | Vienna | Carcavelos |
| A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification) | ||||||
| A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification). | Cfb | Dfb | Cfa | Csb | Cfb | Csa |
| A1P015: District boundary | ||||||
| A1P015: District boundary | Geographic | Geographic | Geographic | Virtual | Virtual | Geographic |
| Other | ||||||
| A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab | ||||||
| A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab: | Private | Private | Private | Public | Private | Mixed |
| A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure | ||||||
| A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure: | Single Owner | Single Owner | Single Owner | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners |
| A1P018: Number of buildings in PED | ||||||
| A1P018: Number of buildings in PED | 1 | 9 | 15 | 22 | 60 | |
| A1P019: Conditioned space | ||||||
| A1P019: Conditioned space [m²] | 2360 | 112000 | 80.000 | |||
| A1P020: Total ground area | ||||||
| A1P020: Total ground area [m²] | 3860 | 165000 | 285.400 | 330.000 | ||
| A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area | ||||||
| A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| A1P022: Financial schemes | ||||||
| A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estate | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | no |
| A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | 7804440 | |||||
| A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO scheme | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Other | no | no | no | yes | no | yes |
| A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural funding | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National funding | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional funding | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal funding | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EU | no | yes | yes | yes | no | no |
| A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | 308875 | |||||
| A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - National | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regional | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | ||||||
| A1P022: Other | ||||||
| A1P023: Economic Targets | ||||||
| A1P023: Economic Targets |
|
|
|
| ||
| A1P023: Other | - Economic savings on water consumption and electricity - Promoting the circular economy and carbon neutrality in waste - Business oportunities resulting from less carbon-intensive practices created by the project - Financial benefits from using renewable energy sources –creation of Energy Communities | |||||
| A1P024: More comments: | ||||||
| A1P024: More comments: | The project is a follow-up from the “Social Beautiful” concept which was developed in collaboration between Labyrint (Support in sheltered housing), Area (housing company), the municipality of Uden, and Hendriks Coppelmans (developer). The concept aims to provide an answer to changes in various policy areas and the changing demands of society. The Social Beautiful concept consists of the following elements: 1. Living, working, and community services are brought together in one location. A multifunctional residential and service centre is being realized at the location. 2. Housing is shaped by the realization of financially accessible homes suitable for the target group. The housing design is tailored to the target group. it may also include sheltered / protected living. 3. Work takes place at the location or from the same location. The work has a social function within the neighbourhood. Wage-related work must contribute to providing structure in the daily activities of the residents. 4. Neighbourhood management is organized from the location in the surrounding neighbourhood. A service package is provided from the residential and service centre that contributes to the ability of neighbourhood residents to live independently for longer, to strengthen the social network, and to improve the quality of life and safety in the neighbourhood. 5. The houses are suitable for use at all times for regular rental. Communal facilities must be realized within the contours of a regular apartment. The objective is to offer a suitable living and working situation to a group of vulnerable citizens. In this way they become a fully-fledged part of society. They not only make use of the facilities themselves, but also give substance to the level of facilities in the municipality. Due to the integrated approach, they experience a greater sense of well-being and security. | The Espoonlahti district is located on the south-western coast of Espoo. With 56,000 inhabitants, it is the second largest of the Espoo city centres. The number of inhabitants is estimated to grow to 70,000 within the next 10 years. Espoonlahti will be a future transit hub of the south-western Espoo, along the metro line, and the increasing stream of passengers provides a huge potential for retail, business and residential developments. E-mobility solutions and last-mile services have strong potential in the area when subway extension is finished and running. The extensive (re)development of the Lippulaiva blocks make a benchmark catering to the everyday needs of residents. The completely new shopping centre is a state-of-the-art cross point with 20,000 daily customers and 10,000 daily commuters (3.5 million/year). The new underground metro line and station, and feeder line bus terminal, are fully integrated. Residential housing of approximately 550 new apartments will be built on top. Lippulaiva is a large traffic hub, directly connected to public transport and right next to the Länsiväylä highway and extensive cycle paths. Lippulaiva offers diverse, mixed-use services, such as a shopping mall, public services, a day care centre, residential apartment buildings, and underground parking facilities. Lippulaiva received the LEED Gold environmental certificate and Smart Building Gold certificate. • Flagship of sustainability • Cooling and heating demand from geothermal energy system (on-site) with energy storage system, 4 MW • PV panels: roof and façade, 630 kWp • Smart control strategies for electricity and thermal energy, smart microgrid-system and battery storage • Charging capacity for 134 EVs | In addition to having the most energy efficient academic building in Turkey, the university campus also has 3 buildings with LEED NC Campus certificate and LEED BD+C Gold certificate. In addition, it aims to continuously improve the energy efficiency objectives on campus in an innovative way. For this purpose, energy management and storage systems are being installed in the Dormitory 6 building, which is used as the demo area of the LEGOFIT project, for the purpose of turning it into a PED project. | The Cascais Smart Pole by NOVA SBE was implemented in a multifunctional area that integrates housing, commerce, facilities, and public spaces, acquiring a local identity through sociocultural interaction between residents, students, and visitors/tourists , also covering an area of 4.2ha of green spaces. Located in the Municipality of Cascais, a leading municipality in defining a Municipal Roadmap for Carbon Neutrality, the Cascais Smart Pole by NOVA SBE led the generation of change-makers, influencing people and all stakeholders on the path of innovation combined with carbon neutrality. The Cascais Smart Pole is a living lab pilot project that aims to create a carbon-neutral, sustainable urban environment by integrating innovative technological solutions and community engagement. The concept of the project is based on a physical space and a virtual space, providing testing ground for experimentation in domains of decarbonization, renewable energy, and climate resilience. Planned continuation of the project is establishing a Renewable Energy Community (REC) to promote local clean energy production and shared consumption. This initiative will support the Cascais 2030 Sustainable Energy Strategy and the Cascais 2050 Carbon Neutrality Roadmap, engaging residents and businesses in sustainable practices to drive collective impact. A Renewable Energy Community (CER) will be created from the Cascais Smart Pole, which will encourage residents, companies and NOVA SBE to jointly invest in the installation of photovoltaic panels, to share the consumption of the clean energy produced. The panels will be installed on the roof of NOVA SBE and surrounding residential buildings, and all interested parties will be able to participate in the CER by investing, purchasing energy or donating their roof or panels to the CER. The aim is for residents to not only save on their electricity bills, but also obtain social and financial returns and contribute to the decarbonization effort in that geographic area. Main objectives/activities and outcomes of the living lab include: 1. Roadmap for Carbon Neutrality: The project developed a comprehensive inventory of 2019 greenhouse gas emissions and modeled the path to carbon neutrality by 2050. Strategic options for decarbonization were outlined, with a focus on mobility and energy efficiency. The efforts resulted in a 65-ton CO₂ reduction during the project's duration. 2. Smart Pole Platform: A participatory digital platform was created, providing data on project activities and allowing public engagement through submissions of ideas. It also included tools like a carbon footprint calculator. The platform gained over 13,000 visits, fostering collaboration among stakeholders. 3. Smart Pole Community: Community-focused initiatives included renewable energy workshops and microgreen cultivation activities. Events engaged locals and students, with over 17 activities conducted, such as street fairs and environmental workshops. The Microgreen Community distributed kits to promote urban agriculture. 4. Urban Mobility: Sustainable transport behaviors were promoted via a mobile app (MobiCascais), tracking CO₂ emissions saved. Due to delays, some planned features were revised, but the app incorporated mobility KPIs and avoided emissions data. A campaign highlighted the importance of shared mobility. 5. Energy Efficiency: Smart energy management systems optimized HVAC and lighting, integrating occupancy data for predictive efficiency. Indoor air quality monitoring systems were deployed, and smart energy counters were installed in classrooms. The project saved energy while addressing privacy concerns. 6. Circular Economy in Waste: The initiative collected 19.4 tons of used cooking oil, surpassing the goal by 43%, producing biodiesel for municipal vehicles. A gamified "Pay-As-You-Throw" system incentivized recycling, reducing waste contamination rates. Smart bins monitored waste levels, improving collection efficiency. 7. Green Living: Urban green spaces were transformed with native plants and smart irrigation systems, reducing water consumption and enhancing biodiversity. Over 7,000 trees and shrubs were planted, and lawns were replaced with water-efficient meadows. Smart systems optimized water use and tracked conservation progress. 8. Smart Pole Market: Originally intended as a carbon credit marketplace, this activity shifted focus to creating a carbon footprint calculator for businesses. The tool provides actionable insights for companies to reduce their emissions. Workshops introduced the software to local entrepreneurs. 9. Smart Pole World: Communication efforts included public awareness campaigns, workshops, and art initiatives like "Sustent’Arte." Over 20 events engaged stakeholders, promoting the project's goals. The communication strategy emphasized local impact and scalability to inspire other municipalities. Main areas/axes of the living lab: Community, Water, Buildings, Energy, Green Spaces, Mobility, Circular Economy | ||
| A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs | ||||||
| A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR] | 7804440 | 1 | ||||
| Contact person for general enquiries | ||||||
| A1P026: Name | Tonje Healey Trulsrud | Elina Ekelund | Cem Keskin | Adelina Rodrigues | Rachel Leutgöb (e7) | Mariana Sardinha |
| A1P027: Organization | Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) | Citycon Oyj | Center for Energy, Environment and Economy, Ozyegin University | Maia Municipality (CM Maia) – Energy and Mobility division | e7 GmbH | Get2C Climate change, Energy, Carbon markets, Climate finance, Sustainable development |
| A1P028: Affiliation | Research Center / University | SME / Industry | Research Center / University | Municipality / Public Bodies | Research Center / University | SME / Industry |
| A1P028: Other | Mariana Sardinha | |||||
| A1P029: Email | tonje.h.trulsrud@ntnu.no | Elina.ekelund@citycon.com | cem.keskin@ozyegin.edu.tr | dscm.adelina@cm-maia.pt | rachel.leutgoeb@e-sieben.at | mariana.sardinha@get2c.com |
| Contact person for other special topics | ||||||
| A1P030: Name | Elina Ekelund | M. Pınar Mengüç | Carolina Gonçalves (AdEPorto) | Mariana SardinhaMariana Sardinha | ||
| A1P031: Email | Elina.ekelund@citycon.com | pinar.menguc@ozyegin.edu.tr | carolinagoncalves@adeporto.eu | mariana.sardinha@get2c.com | ||
| Pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| A2P001: Fields of application | ||||||
| A2P001: Fields of application |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A2P001: Other | 1. Roadmap for Carbon Neutrality • Tools: GHG emissions inventory tools and carbon modeling methodologies, with support from Get2C. • Methods: Data collection through surveys, energy use assessments, and direct engagement with stakeholders; scenario modeling for emissions reduction up to 2050. • Strategies: Alignment with the Cascais Municipal Roadmap for Carbon Neutrality and development of decarbonization pathways based on predictive modeling. 2. Smart Pole Platform • Tools: An interactive digital platform integrated with real-time data sharing and public participation features. Methods: Benchmarking similar IoT-enabled platforms and creating user-friendly UX/UI designs. • Methods: Benchmarking of similar platforms and custom UX/UI design to track project-specific KPIs like CO₂ emissions and participation rates. • Strategies: Enabling transparency and collaboration by integrating APIs for data collection and feedback loops for community input. 3. Smart Pole Community • Tools: Social media platforms and engagement tools for organizing events and activities. • Methods: Conducting workshops, technical visits, and environmental events to foster collaboration among residents, students, and stakeholders. • Strategies: Promoting sustainable habits through participatory activities such as microgreen cultivation and educational campaigns. 4. Urban Mobility • Tools: The Cascais Smart Pole platform mobility dashboard for monitoring metrics like avoided CO₂ emissions, trips taken, and kilometers traveled. • Methods: Integration of mobility data with platform analytics; promotion of shared transport options like bikes and scooters. • Strategies: Public awareness campaigns and gamification to encourage sustainable mobility behaviors and reduce reliance on private vehicles. 5. Energy Efficiency • Tools: Cisco CMX platform for zonal mapping, IAQ monitoring sensors for CO₂ and temperature tracking, intelligent energy systems, including occupancy-based HVAC and lighting controls managed via the Building Management System (BMS) by Veolia. • Methods: Integration of Wi-Fi-based occupancy data with HVAC and lighting systems for predictive energy adjustments. • Strategies: Real-time energy optimization algorithms and data-driven decision-making to improve efficiency and reduce emissions 6. Circular Economy in Waste • Tools: Smart waste bins with monitoring systems and a gamified "Pay-As-You-Throw" (PAYT) system using Citypoints by PRIO. • Methods: Collection of used cooking oils for biodiesel production, incentivized through gamification. • Strategies: Promoting recycling behaviors via smart monitoring and awareness campaigns while integrating circular economy practices 7. Water Use • Tools: Installation of water refill stations integrated with a digital mapping system for real-time updates on station locations. • Methods: Community campaigns promoting tap water use and workshops highlighting the environmental benefits of refill infrastructure. • Strategies: Educating residents and visitors about sustainable water use practices and providing accessible refill infrastructure. 8. Green Living • Tools: Smart irrigation systems, including various controllers, including Hunter's ACC2-75D-P controller and the MySOLEM app, with geolocation-based control and sensors for soil moisture, leaks, and water usage. Transformation of urban green spaces with native plants, planting trees. • Methods: Conversion of traditional lawns to rainfed meadows; installation of localized irrigation equipment to minimize water consumption. • Strategies: Expansion of smart irrigation systems to additional areas, enhancing biodiversity, and involving the community in sustainable practices 9. Smart Pole Market • Tools: A carbon footprint calculator – a software by Delta Soluções designed to assist businesses in assessing and reducing their emissions. • Methods: Workshops and municipal partnerships to encourage software adoption among local companies. • Strategies: Supporting businesses in carbon reporting and neutrality planning through accessible tools and guidance. 10. Smart Pole World • Tools: Cascais Smart Pole World website, multimedia campaigns, educational programs and Sustent’Arte artistic initiatives. • Methods: Stakeholder engagement through events like GreenFest and knowledge transfer via workshops and summer schools. • Strategies: Leveraging digital communication and interactive events to raise awareness and inspire community-driven sustainability efforts. | |||||
| A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields | ||||||
| A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields | Energy efficiency: Energy efficient envelope, with good insulation, triple glazing windows and airtight envelope. (EPC = 0) Energy Flexibility: MCP controls for the heat pump in the apartments. Energy production: PV panels on the roof, Ground source heat pumps Waste management: construction waste was kept to a minimum and sorted and collected separately as much as possible. Indoor air quality: Exhaust ventilation and opening of windows Construction materials: low carbon emission building materials | Energy efficiency: - eliminating waste energy utilizing smart energy system - utilizing excess heat from grocery stores Energy flexibility: - A battery energy storage system (1,5 MW/1,5MWh); Active participation in Nordpool electricity market (FCR-N) Energy production: - heating and cooling from geothermal heat pump system; 171 energy wells (over 51 km); heat capacity 4 MW - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Estimation of annual production is about 540 MWh (630 kWp) E-mobility - Installation of charging stations for electric vehicles (for 134 EVs) - e-bike services (warm storage room, charging cabinets for e-bikes) Digital technologies: - Building Analytics system by Schneider Electric | LEED NC Campus + LEGOFIT Project Energy Efficiency: Tri- generation, Compliance with ISO 50001, ASHRAE 90.1, energy efficient appliances, HVAC and lighting Energy flexibility: Energy demand management Energy production: Solar PVs Onsite + (to be installed more) E-mobility: EV Charging stations Indoor Air Quality: Energy Management System, Compliance with ASHRAE 62.1, ASHRAE 55 Construction materials: Passive systems, LEED certified buildings, innovative materials such as PCM Waste Management: Zero waste document | Energy production: - installation of photovoltaic systems for renewable on-site energy production; - installation of a BIPV demonstrator for the City Hall building. Energy flexibility: - implementation of an energy community through an active citizens involvement process. Digital technologies: - smart-meters installation in some dwellings in order to monitor consumption and suggest more sustainable energy behaviours. [PCP] Through https://balcaodigital.e-redes.pt/consumptions/history “Espaço Municipal” (https://www.espacomunicipal.pt/pt/) might access history of consumption up to midnight of the previous day. E-mobility: - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban comfort and air quality: - Monitoring units for air pollutants concentration (PM2.5, PM10, NO2) [PCP] Currently we are monitoring CO, O3, NO2, SO2, noise, PM2.5 and PM10 at a point 267 m east from the four buildings southeast of Sobreiro area: | ||
| A2P003: Application of ISO52000 | ||||||
| A2P003: Application of ISO52000 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | |
| A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance | ||||||
| A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance | ||||||
| A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance | No | No | No | No | Yes | |
| A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation | ||||||
| A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation | not included | Mobility is not included in the energy model. | Not included, the campus is a non car area except emergencies | Mobility was an integral part of the CO₂ inventory for the Cascais Smart Pole project, assessed through surveys capturing commuting behaviors among the NOVA SBE community. Emission factors for various transport modes, including private cars, public transport, and active mobility, were calculated to quantify contributions to greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, the MobiCascais app tracked avoided CO₂ emissions from shifts to sustainable mobility options like shared bicycles and public transport. This data was integrated into the project’s digital platform, providing key metrics such as trips taken, kilometers traveled, and tons of CO₂ avoided, supporting the roadmap toward carbon neutrality. | ||
| A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand | ||||||
| A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum] | 0.148 | 5.5 | 1 | |||
| A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand | ||||||
| A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum] | 0.109 | 5.8 | ||||
| A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility | ||||||
| A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure | ||||||
| A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year | ||||||
| A2P011: PV | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
| A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.058 | 0.54 | ||||
| A2P011: Wind | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P011: Hydro | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P011: Biomass_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P011: Biomass_peat_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P011: PVT_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P011: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year | ||||||
| A2P012: Geothermal | yes | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 5 | |||||
| A2P012: Solar Thermal | no | no | no | yes | no | yes |
| A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Biomass_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Waste heat+HP | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Biomass_peat_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: PVT_th | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Biomass_firewood_th | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P012: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes | ||||||
| A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes | *Annual energy use below is presentedin primary energy consumption | The photovoltaic panels installed as part of the Cascais Smart Pole project are currently set up within a self-consumption production unit (UPAC). While a contract was signed to allow sharing surplus production with nearby facilities, such as a school and a paddle tennis court, this setup remains in preliminary stages and has not yet been fully implemented. This arrangement is intended to eventually support shared energy use as part of the ongoing Renewable Energy Community (REC) initiative. Additionally, the project incorporates the production of biodiesel from collected used cooking oil (UCO), which is processed and utilized in municipal vehicles. | ||||
| A2P014: Annual energy use | ||||||
| A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum] | 0.194 | 11.3 | 3.5 | |||
| A2P015: Annual energy delivered | ||||||
| A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum] | 0.0368 | 5.76 | ||||
| A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year | ||||||
| A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | 0 | 0 | ||||
| A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year | ||||||
| A2P017: Gas | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | 0 | |||||
| A2P017: Coal | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | 0 | |||||
| A2P017: Oil | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | 0 | |||||
| A2P017: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year | ||||||
| A2P018: PV | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | 0.00045547 | |||||
| A2P018: Wind | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: Hydro | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: Biomass_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: Biomass_peat_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: PVT_el | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P018: Other | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | 5.26 | |||||
| A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year | ||||||
| A2P019: Geothermal | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Solar Thermal | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Biomass_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Waste heat+HP | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Biomass_peat_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: PVT_th | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Biomass_firewood_th | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P019: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | ||||||
| A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary | ||||||
| A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary | 0 | 1.0532319391635 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED | ||||||
| A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum] | -0.00043 | 0 | ||||
| A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab | ||||||
| A2P022: Safety & Security | Personal Safety | |||||
| A2P022: Health | Healthy community | |||||
| A2P022: Education | ||||||
| A2P022: Mobility | Sustainable mobility | |||||
| A2P022: Energy | NOn-renewable primary energy balance, renewable energy ratio, grid purchase factor, load cover factor/self-generation, supply cover factor/self-consumption, net energy/net power, peak delivered/peak expoted, total greenhouse gas emission | On-site energy ratio | Yes | |||
| A2P022: Water | ||||||
| A2P022: Economic development | capital costs, operational cots, overall economic performance (5 KPIs) | |||||
| A2P022: Housing and Community | demographic composition, diverse community, social cohesion | |||||
| A2P022: Waste | ||||||
| A2P022: Other | Smartness and flecibility, Indoor Environmental Quality, Social performance - Equity (affordable housing, access to servicees and amenitioes, afforability of energy, living conditions, sustinable mobility, universal design) | |||||
| A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation | ||||||
| A2P023: Photovoltaics | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| A2P023: Solar thermal collectors | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P023: Wind Turbines | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Geothermal energy system | yes | yes | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P023: Waste heat recovery | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Waste to energy | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P023: Polygeneration | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Co-generation | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Heat Pump | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | no |
| A2P023: Hydrogen | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Hydropower plant | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Biomass | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Biogas | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P023: Other | ||||||
| A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility | ||||||
| A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) | no | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
| A2P024: Energy management system | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
| A2P024: Demand-side management | yes | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P024: Smart electricity grid | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
| A2P024: Thermal Storage | no | yes | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P024: Electric Storage | no | yes | yes | yes | no | no |
| A2P024: District Heating and Cooling | no | no | yes | no | yes | no |
| A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systems | yes | no | yes | yes | no | yes |
| A2P024: P2P – buildings | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| A2P024: Other | ||||||
| A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency | ||||||
| A2P025: Deep Retrofitting | no | no | no | yes | yes | no |
| A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildings | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
| A2P025: High-performance new buildings | yes | yes | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting) | no | yes | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P025: Urban data platforms | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P025: Mobile applications for citizens | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting) | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
| A2P025: Smart irrigation | no | no | yes | no | no | yes |
| A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposal | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P025: Smart surveillance | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P025: Other | ||||||
| A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility | ||||||
| A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private) | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
| A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances) | no | yes | no | no | no | yes |
| A2P026: e-Mobility | no | yes | yes | yes | no | no |
| A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutions | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P026: Car-free area | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
| A2P026: Other | Local transportation hub with direct connection to metro & bus terminal; parking spaces for 1,400 bicycles and for 1,300 cars Promoting e-Mobility: 134 charging stations, A technical reservation for expanding EV charging system 1400 bicycle racks and charging cabinets for 10 e-bicycle batteries | |||||
| A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes | ||||||
| A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes | ||||||
| A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates | ||||||
| A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes | EPC = 0, energy neutral building | Energy Performance Certificate => Energy efficiency class B (2018 version) | The Municipal Buildings have an energy certificate, according to the Portuguese legislation. | |||
| A2P029: Any other building / district certificates | ||||||
| A2P029: Any other building / district certificates | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | |
| A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes | LEED (Core & Shell, v4) GOLD certification, Smart Building certification (GOLD) | LEED BD+C, LEED NC CAMPUS | ||||
| A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy | ||||||
| A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy |
|
|
|
| ||
| A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy | ||||||
| A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy | Relevant city strategies behind PED development in Espoo include the following: - The Espoo Story: Sustainability is heavily included within the values and goals of the current Espoo city strategy, also known as the Espoo Story, running from 2021 to 2025. For example, the strategy names being a responsible pioneer as one of the main values of the city and has chosen achieving carbon neutrality by 2030 as one of the main goals of the current council term. In addition to the Espoo story, four cross-administrative development programmes act as cooperation platforms that allow the city, together with its partners, to develop innovative solutions through experiments and pilot projects in line with the Espoo Story. The Sustainable Espoo development programme is one of the four programmes, thus putting sustainability on the forefront in city development work. - EU Mission: 100 climate-neutral and smart cities by 2030: Cities selected for the Mission commit to achieving carbon-neutrality in 2030. A key tool in the Mission is the Climate City Contract. Each selected city will prepare and implement its contracts in collaboration with local businesses as well as other stakeholders and residents. - Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy: Espoo is committed to the Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy, under which the signatories commit to supporting the European Union’s 40% greenhouse gas emission reduction goal by 2030. The Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP) is a key instrument for implementing the agreement. The Action Plan outlines the key measures the city will take to achieve its carbon neutrality goal. The plan also includes a mapping of climate change risks and vulnerabilities, adaptation measures, emission calculations, emission reduction scenarios and impact estimations of measures. The SECAP of the City of Espoo is available here (only available in Finnish). - UN Sustainable development Goals: The city of Espoo has committed to becoming a forerunner and achieving the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) by 2025. The goal is to make Espoo financially, ecologically, socially, and culturally sustainable. - The Circular Cities Declaration: At the end of 2020, Espoo signed the Europe-wide circular economy commitment Circular Cities Declaration. The ten goals of the declaration promote the implementation of the city’s circular economy. - Espoo Clean Heat: Fortum and the City of Espoo are committed to producing carbon-neutral district heating in the network operating in the areas of Espoo, Kauniainen and Kirkkonummi during the 2020s. The district heating network provides heating to some 250,000 end-users in homes and offices. Coal will be completely abandoned in the production of district heating by 2025. The main targets related to PED development included in the noted city strategies are the following: - Espoo will achieve carbon neutrality by 2030. To be precise, this carbon neutrality goal is defined as an 80% emission reduction from the 1990 level by the year 2030. The remaining 20% share can be absorbed in carbon sinks or compensated by other means. - District heating in Espoo will be carbon-neutral by 2029, and coal-based production will be phased out from district heating by 2025. - Espoo aims to end the use of fossil fuels in the heating of city-owned buildings by 2025. - Quantitative goals within the Espoo SECAP report: - Espoo aims to reduce total energy consumption within the municipal sector by 7.5% by the end of 2025 in comparison to the 2015 level. The social housing company Espoon Asunnot OY aims to meet the same target. - Espoo aims to cover 10% of the energy consumption of new buildings via on-site production. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of cycling to 15% by 2024. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of public transport by 1.1% yearly. - Espoo aims to reduce the emissions of bus transport by 90% by the end of 2025, when compared to 2010 levels. | National Roadmap for Carbon Neutrality 2050 (RNC2050): 1. GHG Emissions Reduction: 55% reduction by 2030 (from 2005 levels). 100% reduction by 2050. 2. Renewable Energy: 47% share of renewables in final energy consumption by 2030. 20% renewable energy in transport by 2030. 3. Energy Efficiency: 35% improvement in primary energy consumption by 2030. Cascais 2050 Municipal Roadmap for Carbon Neutrality: 1. Renewable Energy Production: Local Energy Communities: Initiated in 2022, Cascais aims to generate 213 GWh annually through photovoltaic installations (23% of town’s electricity consumption). 2. Waste Management: 152% increase in plastic recycling (2014-2022) 3. Electric Mobility: Adoption of 100% electric waste collection vehicles | ||||
| A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid | ||||||
| A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid |
|
|
| |||
| A3P003: Other | Boiler Automation, Energy Management System, Electric Battery Storage, Demand Management and Flexible Pricing | At a national level there are some studies regarding the decarbonization of the gas grid, but no concrete strategies so far. | ||||
| A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities | ||||||
| A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities | - Citycon (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) aims to be carbon neutral in its energy use by 2030 - Lippulaiva is a unique urban centre with state-of-the-art energy concept. The centre has a smart managing system, which allows for example the temporary reduction of power used in air conditioning and charging stations when energy consumption is at its peak. In addition, a backup generator and a large electric battery will balance the operation of the electricity network. - Lippulaiva is also an important mobility hub for the people of Espoo. Espoonlahti metro station is located under the centre, and the West Metro started to operate to Espoonlahti in December 2022. Lippulaiva also has a bus terminal, which serves the metro’s feeder traffic in the Espoonlahti major district. | Carbon and Energy Neutrality | • Reduction of GHG Emissions and Decarbonization Pathways (renewable energy adoption, energy-efficient retrofitting, reducing individual vehicle use) • Infrastructure and Technological Development (sustainable mobility infrastructure - public transportation, EV charging stations, cycling networks; Green spaces adaptation to climate change – biodiversity planting, smart irrigation systems; Digital tools development - carbon footprint calculators, mobility information hubs to support decision-making and track progress) • Promotion of Circular Economy and Waste Management (biodiesel production from used cooking oil, community composting, home composting, waste sorting systems) • Community Engagement and Behavioral Change (renewable energy communities, sustainable/soft mobility practices, waste reduction behaviors, awareness and education, workshops, campaigns, events) • Stakeholder Collaboration (strengthen partnerships among local businesses, public authorities, educational institutions, and community members; shared ownership of initiatives through participatory planning and implementation) • Policy Integration and Planning (alignment with Cascais 2050 Roadmap, the National Roadmap for Carbon Neutrality, and European decarbonization strategies; share of best practices; set up of a legal framework for REC (Renewable energy Community in the area) • Monitoring and Scaling Successful Pilots (Establish robust monitoring systems for energy, water, and waste management; Replicate and expand pilot projects like smart irrigation, carbon footprint tools, and renewable energy communities to other areas) | |||
| A3P005: Sustainable behaviour | ||||||
| A3P005: Sustainable behaviour | For Citycon, it was important to engage local people within the Lippulaiva project. During the construction period as well as after opening of the shopping center, citizens have been engaged in multiple ways, such as informing local citizens of the progress of construction, engaging young people in the design processes of the shopping centre and long-term commitment of youngsters with Lippulaiva Buddy class initiative. Users’ engagement activities are conducted in close co-operation with SPARCS partners. | Under LEGOFIT project, promoting sustainable behavior for better occupant experience is a targeted aim under a work package. | Use of public transport, bicycles, and shared mobility options; using carbon footprint calculators to understand and reduce emissions; recycling and proper waste sorting, including biodiesel production from used cooking oil; adopting smart irrigation systems to conserve water in green spaces; engagement in community composting and home composting to reduce organic waste; preparedness for participation in Renewable Energy Communities (RECs) for shared renewable energy production; switching to energy-efficient technologies like LED lighting and A+ rated appliances; participation in events, workshops, and educational courses on sustainability and climate action. | |||
| A3P006: Economic strategies | ||||||
| A3P006: Economic strategies |
|
|
|
| ||
| A3P006: Other | Collaborative energy models: Renewable Energy Communities (RECs) | |||||
| A3P007: Social models | ||||||
| A3P007: Social models |
|
|
|
|
| |
| A3P007: Other | ||||||
| A3P008: Integrated urban strategies | ||||||
| A3P008: Integrated urban strategies |
|
|
|
| ||
| A3P008: Other | ||||||
| A3P009: Environmental strategies | ||||||
| A3P009: Environmental strategies |
|
|
|
|
| |
| A3P009: Other | Carbon free in terms of energy | |||||
| A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects | ||||||
| A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects | - Energy efficiency regulations (Directive 2006/32/EC and 2009/72/EC) - EU directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings => all new buildings should be “nearly zero-energy buildings” (nZEB) from 2021 | ISO 45001, ISO 14001, ISO 50001, Zero Waste Policy | compliance with Renewable Energy Communities (REC) regulations for energy sharing; •adherence to General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) for data privacy in smart systems; •following EEA Grants public procurement rules for tendering and service hiring; •meeting urban mobility and transportation regulations for low-emission zones and EV infrastructure; •fulfilling waste management regulations for biodiesel production and organic waste processing | |||
| B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition | ||||||
| B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition | The demonstration projects is a new residential development, which consists of an apartment complex which includes 39 apartments spread over 3 floors. It is a sustainble plus energy neighbouhood, and has reached a plus energy balance on its first year in operation. It has MPC controls on the individual heat pumps to improve the energy flexibility of the apartments. It includes the "social beatiful" concepts with a strong emphasis on the social sustainability of the project. | Lippulaiva is a project with high level goal in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production. | The campus should be considered a PED case study due to its exemplary commitment to sustainability and energy efficiency, as evidenced by several of its buildings achieving LEED certification. This certification underscores the campus's adherence to rigorous environmental standards and its proactive steps towards reducing carbon footprints. Also, the integration of sustainable practices across the campus aligns with the PED framework, which aims to create urban areas that produce more energy than they consume. Therefore, this campus serves as a model of how educational institutions can lead the way in fostering sustainable communities and advancing the goals of PED. | The Cascais Smart Pole (CSP) is a relevant PED case study as it is a district-level project with high level of aspiration in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production. It employs core PED principles—energy production, efficiency, and sustainability—by integrating renewable energy, efficiency measures, community engagement, smart technologies, and scalable and replicable practices. Its outcomes align with the PED vision by fostering renewable energy, establishing Renewable Energy Communities, aiming for energy surplus, enhancing quality of life, and reducing environmental impacts. | ||
| B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development | ||||||
| B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development | The need for social housing and the ambition to create a great living environment with a high-performance apartment complex, supplied with renewable energy. It results in lower energy bills for the tenants and high-quality homes. | - Citycon’s (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) target is to be carbon neutral by 2030 - Increasing sustainability requirements from the financing, tenants, cities, other stakeholders | The purpose of implementing the PED project on this sustainable campus, where several buildings have LEED certification, is to further enhance its energy efficiency and environmental stewardship by creating a district that generates more energy than it consumes. The initiator was motivated by the need to address climate change, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and promote renewable energy sources. Additionally, the campus's existing commitment to sustainability and the success of its LEED-certified buildings provided a strong foundation for demonstrating the feasibility and benefits of PED development, serving as a model for sustainable urban living and energy self-sufficiency. | CSP aims to serve as a living lab that demonstrates innovative solutions for achieving carbon neutrality and addressing climate change. Living Lab not only reduces carbon emissions but also creates a blueprint for replicable and scalable solutions, addressing the urgent need for climate action while improving quality of life, enabling energy efficiency, renewable energy production, energy sharing through REC (to be established), and aligning with global decarbonization goals. | ||
| B1P003: Environment of the case study area | ||||||
| B2P003: Environment of the case study area | Suburban area | Urban area | Suburban area | Urban area | ||
| B1P004: Type of district | ||||||
| B2P004: Type of district |
|
|
|
| ||
| B1P005: Case Study Context | ||||||
| B1P005: Case Study Context |
|
|
|
| ||
| B1P006: Year of construction | ||||||
| B1P006: Year of construction | 2022 | 2024 | 2020 | |||
| B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential | ||||||
| B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential | 1662 | |||||
| B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential | ||||||
| B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential | 1878 | |||||
| B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential | ||||||
| B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential | 9800 | 4925 | ||||
| B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential | ||||||
| B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential | 9800 | 6126 | ||||
| B1P011: Population density before intervention | ||||||
| B1P011: Population density before intervention | 0 | 0 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| B1P012: Population density after intervention | ||||||
| B1P012: Population density after intervention | 0 | 0 | 34.337771548704 | 0 | 0 | 24.254545454545 |
| B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention | ||||||
| B1P013: Residential | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Office | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Industry and Utility | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Commercial | no | yes | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Institutional | no | no | yes | no | no | yes |
| B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²] | 285.400 | |||||
| B1P013: Natural areas | no | yes | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Recreational | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Dismissed areas | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P013: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention | ||||||
| B1P014: Residential | yes | yes | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²] | 2394 | |||||
| B1P014: Office | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Industry and Utility | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Commercial | no | yes | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Institutional | no | no | yes | no | no | yes |
| B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²] | 280000 | |||||
| B1P014: Natural areas | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Recreational | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
| B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Dismissed areas | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B1P014: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no |
| B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²] | ||||||
| B2P001: PED Lab concept definition | ||||||
| B2P001: PED Lab concept definition | ||||||
| B2P002: Installation life time | ||||||
| B2P002: Installation life time | Permanent installation | |||||
| B2P003: Scale of action | ||||||
| B2P003: Scale | Virtual | |||||
| B2P004: Operator of the installation | ||||||
| B2P004: Operator of the installation | CM Maia, IPMAIA, NEW, AdEP. | |||||
| B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials | ||||||
| B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials | ||||||
| B2P006: Circular Economy Approach | ||||||
| B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials? | No | |||||
| B2P006: Other | ||||||
| B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab |
| |||||
| B2P007: Other | ||||||
| B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab | Municipality | |||||
| B2P008: Other | ||||||
| B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab |
| |||||
| B2P009: Other | Energy Agency | |||||
| B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities | ||||||
| B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities | ||||||
| B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab |
| |||||
| B2P011: Other | ||||||
| B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab | ||||||
| B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab |
| |||||
| B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people | ||||||
| B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people | Depends on the building: _Tecmaia is open to the public but the buildings are for the exclusive use of companies allocated at the industrial site; _The municipal buildings have public access; _The residential buildings have an exclusive use for the residents. | |||||
| B2P014: Monitoring measures | ||||||
| B2P014: Monitoring measures |
| |||||
| B2P015: Key Performance indicators | ||||||
| B2P015: Key Performance indicators |
| |||||
| B2P016: Execution of operations | ||||||
| B2P016: Execution of operations | Current PED status (WP5 SPARCS): Conceptualization and methodology definition of the (virtual) PED for Maia Municipality with real monitoring and assessment in order to replicate and scale up to a city-level PED. The financial investments were already targeted. | |||||
| B2P017: Capacities | ||||||
| B2P017: Capacities | _Energy production and storage, _Monitoring; _Digitization. | |||||
| B2P018: Relations with stakeholders | ||||||
| B2P018: Relations with stakeholders | The relationship with stakeholders (municipal companies, industry, citizens, etc) has been fundamental for the definition of the PED. In this sense, some sessions were organized to gather different points of view in order to trace the best path for the PED. Also, the participation of Maia Municipality in EU projects, as EHHUR and OMEGA-X, makes possible the share of knowledge between different partners. | |||||
| B2P019: Available tools | ||||||
| B2P019: Available tools |
| |||||
| B2P019: Available tools | ||||||
| B2P020: External accessibility | ||||||
| B2P020: External accessibility | ||||||
| C1P001: Unlocking Factors | ||||||
| C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up) | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down) | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.) | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important |
| C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES) | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any) | ||||||
| C1P002: Driving Factors | ||||||
| C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important |
| C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency) | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important |
| C1P002: Economic growth need | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.) | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important |
| C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any) | ||||||
| C1P003: Administrative barriers | ||||||
| C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P003: Lack of public participation | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important |
| C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important |
| C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important |
| C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos) | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important |
| C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any) | Delay in the Environmental Dialogue processing in the municipality | |||||
| C1P004: Policy barriers | ||||||
| C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important |
| C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers | ||||||
| C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important |
| C1P005: Regulatory instability | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P005: Non-effective regulations | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important |
| C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P006: Environmental barriers | ||||||
| C1P006: Environmental barriers | Air Quality Management Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Energy Efficiency Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Water Conservation Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Waste Management Importance Level: 4 (Important) Material Selection Importance Level: 4 (Important) Renewable Energy Integration Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Heat Island Effect Mitigation Importance Level: 4 (Important) Noise Pollution Control Importance Level: 3 (Moderately Important) | |||||
| C1P007: Technical barriers | ||||||
| C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P007: Deficient planning | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P007: Lack of well-defined process | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers | ||||||
| C1P008: Inertia | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important |
| C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important |
| C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important |
| C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important |
| C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P008: Rebound effect | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important |
| C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important |
| C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers | ||||||
| C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important |
| C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important |
| C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P010: Financial barriers | ||||||
| C1P010: Hidden costs | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important |
| C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P010: Economic crisis | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P010: Risk and uncertainty | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important |
| C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important |
| C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P011: Market barriers | ||||||
| C1P011: Split incentives | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important |
| C1P011: Energy price distortion | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs) | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important |
| C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant |
| C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any) | ||||||
| C1P012: Stakeholders involved | ||||||
| C1P012: Government/Public Authorities |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: Research & Innovation |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: Financial/Funding |
|
| ||||
| C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data |
|
| ||||
| C1P012: Business process management |
|
| ||||
| C1P012: Urban Services providers |
|
| ||||
| C1P012: Real Estate developers |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: Design/Construction companies |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens |
|
|
| |||
| C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs |
|
| ||||
| C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce |
|
| ||||
| C1P012: Other |
| |||||
| C1P012: Other (if any) | ||||||
| Summary |
Authors (framework concept)
Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)
Contributors (to the content)
Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haase (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv), Oya Tabanoglu (Demir Enerji), Jelena Brajković (University of Belgrade), Juveria Shah (Dalarna University), Michela Pirro (ENEA), Francesca Sabatini (University of Bologna)
Implemented by
Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)
