PED DB: Case Studies – PED-EU-NET

Filters:

Name	Project	Type	Compare
Tartu, Estonia	V2G-QUESTS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Utrecht, the Netherlands (District of Kanaleneiland)	V2G-QUESTS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Aveiro, Portugal	V2G-QUESTS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen		PED Relevant Case Study	Uncompare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce	SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
STARDUST, Trento	STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities	PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern		PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Uncompare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki		PED Relevant Case Study	Uncompare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0,		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo		PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Uncompare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna		PED Case Study	Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento		PED Case Study	Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna		PED Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB)	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Võru +CityxChange		PED Case Study	Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Furuset project, Oslo	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights		PED Case Study	Compare
Ydalir project	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport)	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Fornebu, Bærum	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou		PED Case Study	Compare
Smart Energy Åland		PED Case Study	Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED	ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts	PED Case Study	Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED	InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts	PED Case Study	Compare
Munich, Harthof district		PED Case Study	Uncompare
Lublin	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran	CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116	CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Findhorn, the Park	InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts	PED Case Study	Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED	ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities	PED Case Study	Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Case Study	Compare
Aalborg East		PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Trenčín	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf	LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis	NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts	PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods	PED Case Study	Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Zaragoza, Actur	NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand	BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts	PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city	ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins	PED Case Study	Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Case Study	Uncompare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus	LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Espoo, Kera	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio	PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee	PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district	PED Case Study	Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe		PED Case Study	Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad	ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge		PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district		PED Case Study	Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark		PED Case Study	Compare
Évora, Portugal	POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework	PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Groningen, PED South	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Lab	Compare
Groningen, PED North	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Lab	Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Lab	Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT		PED Lab	Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district	STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga	MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future	PED Case Study	Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Case Study	Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Case Study	Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods	PED Case Study	Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet	Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods	PED Case Study	Compare
Tartu, City centre area	SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe	PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab	Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district	GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab		PED Lab	Compare
Kifissia, Energy community	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS	PED Relevant Case Study	Compare

Title	Espoo, Kera	EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern «×»	mySMARTlife, Helsinki «×»	Smart Otaniemi, Espoo «×»	Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen «×»	Munich, Harthof district «×»	Izmir, District of Karşıyaka «×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab	Espoo, Kera	EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern	mySMARTlife, Helsinki	Smart Otaniemi, Espoo	Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen	Munich, Harthof district	Izmir, District of Karşıyaka
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/05/20077_27_pieni.jpg, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/05/Kera020_dwg_Ortokartta_2015_Espoo_pieni.jpg	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/ew-of-the-Pfaff-site-through-the-gate-in-1960-left-and-of-the-boiler-house-the-old.png, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/180119_rahmenplan-pfaff_1000.jpg, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/1659_perspektive_platz_10-f976638f.jpg	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/csm_helsinki-merihaka1_3afe08d7cd.jpg	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/Smart-Otaniemi-Key-player-1.png	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/Drammen-Heat-Pump.jpg, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/10/Drammen-District-Heat-Pump.jpg	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/09/Bild-Quartier-Harthof.png	https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/06/Pamphlet_PED_view_only_27.09.pdf, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/06/Pamphlet_PED_print_only_27.09.pdf, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/06/Ekran-Resmi-2024-06-05-13.18.44.png, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/06/Ekran-Resmi-2024-06-05-13.17.41.png, https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/1-d6faa0a14b046858c1437faa1e19090d/2024/06/Ekran-Resmi-2024-06-05-13.16.52.png
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case study	yes	no	no	no	no	yes	yes
PED relevant case study	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes	no	no
PED Lab.	no	yes	no	yes	no	no	no
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutrality	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes	yes
Annual energy surplus	no	no	no	no	no	yes	yes
Energy community	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
Circularity	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
Air quality and urban comfort	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
Electrification	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
Net-zero energy cost	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
Net-zero emission	no	no	no	no	yes	no	no
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
Maximise self-sufficiency	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
Other	no	no	no	yes	yes	no	no
Other (A1P004)				Social aspects/affordability; societal development, innovation capabilities, export businesses; new investing possibilities	Energy efficient; Carbon-free; A drive for both non fossil fuel and non-greenhouse gas working fluids plus maximum efficiency led to deploying ammonia fjord source heat pumps
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED Lab	Planning Phase	In operation	Completed	In operation	Completed	Implementation Phase	Planning Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date	01/15	10/17	11/16	01/18	01/09	01/23	10/22
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date	12/35		11/21		12/12	12/27	10/25
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project	SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS,						PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation,
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability						Monitoring data available within the districts, Open data city platform – different dashboards, General statistical datasets, GIS open datasets	Monitoring data available within the districts
A1P009: Other							Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab	https://www.espoo.fi/en/housing-and-building/kera	www.pfaff-reallabor.de, www.pfaff-quartier.de	https://www.mysmartlife.eu/cities/helsinki/, https://kartta.hel.fi/3d/atlas/#/	https://smartotaniemi.fi/	https://www.df.no/, https://www.euroheat.org/dhc/knowledge-hub/100-re-district-drammen-norway, https://www.rhc-platform.org/content/uploads/2019/10/RHC-VISION-2050-WEB.pdf	www.ascend-project.eu, ascend-muenchen.de	https://ped-act.com/, https://www.linkedin.com/in/ped-act/, https://www.youtube.com/@PED-ACT
A1P011: Geographic coordinates
X Coordinate (longitude):	24.75377778	7.751684	24.983148	24.830265	10.230603	11.569625059947604	27.110049
Y Coordinate (latitude):	60.21622222	49.436062	60.187947	60.183989	59.741334	48.20436261275152	38.496054
A1P012: Country
A1P012: Country	Finland	Germany	Finland	Finland	Norway	Germany	Turkey
A1P013: City
A1P013: City	Espoo	Kaiserslautern	Helsinki	Espoo	Drammen	Munich	İzmir
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).	Dfb	Cfb	Dfb	Dfb	Dfb	Cfb	Csa
A1P015: District boundary
A1P015: District boundary	Geographic					Geographic	Geographic
Other
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:	Mixed	Public	Mixed	Mixed	Private	Mixed	Private
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:	Multiple Owners	Multiple Owners	Multiple Owners	Multiple Owners	Single Owner	Multiple Owners	Multiple Owners
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED						126	21
A1P019: Conditioned space
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]						206	102795
A1P020: Total ground area
A1P020: Total ground area [m²]	580000				1000	560	32600
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area	0	0	0	0	0	0	3
A1P022: Financial schemes
A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estate	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO scheme	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Other	no	no	no	yes	yes	no	no
A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]				39000000
A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural funding	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National funding	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional funding	no	yes	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal funding	no	yes	yes	no	no	yes	no
A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EU	no	no	no	no	no	yes	yes
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]							1193355
A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - National	no	no	no	no	no	no	yes
A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regional	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Other	no	yes	no	yes	no	no	no
A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]				27000000
A1P022: Other	Multiple different funding schemes depending on the case.
A1P023: Economic Targets
A1P023: Economic Targets	Job creation, Positive externalities, Boosting local businesses, Boosting local and sustainable production, Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products						Positive externalities, Boosting local and sustainable production
A1P023: Other	Circular economy
A1P024: More comments:
A1P024: More comments:
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]
Contact person for general enquiries
A1P026: Name	Joni Mäkinen	Christoph Gollner	Christoph Gollner	Christoph Gollner	Christoph Gollner	Stefan Synek	Ozlem Senyol
A1P027: Organization	City of Espoo	FFG	FFG	FFG	FFG	City of Munich	Karsiyaka Municipality
A1P028: Affiliation	Municipality / Public Bodies	Other	Other	Other	Other	Municipality / Public Bodies	Municipality / Public Bodies
A1P028: Other						Andreas Bärnreuther
A1P029: Email	joni.makinen@espoo.fi	christoph.gollner@ffg.at	christoph.gollner@ffg.at	christoph.gollner@ffg.at	christoph.gollner@ffg.at	stefan.synek@muenchen.de	ozlemkocaer2@gmail.com
Contact person for other special topics
A1P030: Name						Stefan Synek	Hasan Burak Cavka
A1P031: Email						stefan.synek@muenchen.de	hasancavka@iyte.edu.tr
Pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
A2P001: Fields of application
A2P001: Fields of application	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production, E-mobility, Digital technologies, Waste management, Construction materials	Energy efficiency, Energy production	Energy efficiency, E-mobility, Digital technologies	Digital technologies	Energy efficiency	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production, E-mobility, Digital technologies, Construction materials	Energy efficiency, Energy flexibility, Energy production, Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.)
A2P001: Other
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields	- Kera development commitment (https://www.espoo.fi/en/kera-development-commitment). - SPARCS Co-creation model for sustainable and smart urban areas (www.co-creatingsparcs.fi/en). - Kera area carbon neutrality roadmap (https://static.espoo.fi/cdn/ff/MHDdcMNJ9aYn7CjpoD4zNpo5M-M9HIDLXlJdUrUmf-8/1642756766/public/2022-01/Kera%20carbon%20neutrality%20map_EN.pdf)						Methods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4). In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED.
A2P003: Application of ISO52000
A2P003: Application of ISO52000	No						Yes
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance	No					Yes	Yes
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance	No					No	No
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation							Mobility is not included in the calculations.
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]	54.5						3.862
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]	19.4						1.226
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P011: PV	yes	no	no	no	no	yes	yes
A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]	4						1.028
A2P011: Wind	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Hydro	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: PVT_el	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P012: Geothermal	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Solar Thermal	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_heat	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Waste heat+HP	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_peat_heat	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: PVT_th	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_firewood_th	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes	Local energy utility will implement district level thermal solution. First, energy will be produced from waste heat from a local data center. Further thermal solutions are under discussion and development.
A2P014: Annual energy use
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]	78.8						5.088
A2P015: Annual energy delivered
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]	15.4
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]	0
A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P017: Gas	no	no	no	no	no	yes	yes
A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Coal	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Oil	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P018: PV	no	no	no	no	no	yes	yes
A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]							0.707
A2P018: Wind	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Hydro	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_el	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_peat_el	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: PVT_el	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P019: Geothermal	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Solar Thermal	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_heat	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Waste heat+HP	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_peat_heat	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: PVT_th	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_firewood_th	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary	0	0	0	0	0	0	1.4540311173975
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]	450000
A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
A2P022: Safety & Security
A2P022: Health
A2P022: Education
A2P022: Mobility
A2P022: Energy						Energy
A2P022: Water
A2P022: Economic development
A2P022: Housing and Community
A2P022: Waste
A2P022: Other
A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
A2P023: Photovoltaics	yes	yes	no	no	no	yes	yes
A2P023: Solar thermal collectors	no	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Wind Turbines	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Geothermal energy system	no	no	yes	yes	no	yes	no
A2P023: Waste heat recovery	yes	yes	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Waste to energy	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Polygeneration	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Co-generation	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Heat Pump	yes	yes	yes	no	yes	yes	yes
A2P023: Hydrogen	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Hydropower plant	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Biomass	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Biogas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P023: Other
A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)	yes	no	yes	no	no	yes	no
A2P024: Energy management system	yes	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P024: Demand-side management	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P024: Smart electricity grid	yes	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P024: Thermal Storage	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P024: Electric Storage	no	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P024: District Heating and Cooling	yes	no	yes	yes	yes	yes	no
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systems	no	no	yes	no	no	yes	no
A2P024: P2P – buildings	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P024: Other
A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
A2P025: Deep Retrofitting	no	yes	no	no	no	yes	yes
A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildings	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: High-performance new buildings	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)	yes	no	yes	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Urban data platforms	yes	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P025: Mobile applications for citizens	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)	yes	no	no	no	no	no	yes
A2P025: Smart irrigation	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposal	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Smart surveillance	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P025: Other
A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P026: e-Mobility	yes	no	yes	no	no	yes	no
A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutions	yes	no	no	no	no	yes	no
A2P026: Car-free area	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
A2P026: Other
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates	No					Yes	No
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates	No						No
A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy	Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.), Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)	Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.)	Smart cities strategies	Smart cities strategies			Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.), Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract), National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy						City wide climate neutrality by 2035, city administration climate neutrality by 2030	Karşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030. System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023.
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid					Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps	Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps	Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
A3P003: Other
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities							According to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario.
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
A3P006: Economic strategies
A3P006: Economic strategies	PPP models, Circular economy models			Innovative business models		Open data business models
A3P006: Other
A3P007: Social models
A3P007: Social models	Strategies towards (local) community-building, Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies, Quality of Life					Strategies towards (local) community-building, Behavioural Change / End-users engagement, Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance, Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)	Strategies towards (local) community-building, Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies, Affordability
A3P007: Other
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies	Strategic urban planning, Digital twinning and visual 3D models, District Energy plans						Digital twinning and visual 3D models, District Energy plans, SECAP Updates
A3P008: Other
A3P009: Environmental strategies
A3P009: Environmental strategies	Net zero carbon footprint, Life Cycle approach, Greening strategies, Nature Based Solutions (NBS)	Energy Neutral, Carbon-free	Carbon-free	Energy Neutral	Energy Neutral, Carbon-free		Energy Neutral, Low Emission Zone, Pollutants Reduction
A3P009: Other
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects						decision by the Munich City Council in 2019 to become climate neutral by 2030 / 2035
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition	Implementation of district level heating system to make heating energy positive and expanding local renewable electricity production.					Munich as demonstrator together with Lyon in ASCEND project	The pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED).
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development						speed and scale of PEDs
B1P003: Environment of the case study area
B2P003: Environment of the case study area	Urban area		Urban area	Urban area	Suburban area	Urban area	Urban area
B1P004: Type of district
B2P004: Type of district	New construction	New construction, Renovation	New construction, Renovation	New construction, Renovation	Renovation	Renovation	Renovation
B1P005: Case Study Context
B1P005: Case Study Context	Re-use / Transformation Area	Re-use / Transformation Area, New Development, Retrofitting Area	Re-use / Transformation Area, New Development, Retrofitting Area	Re-use / Transformation Area, New Development	Retrofitting Area	Retrofitting Area	Retrofitting Area
B1P006: Year of construction
B1P006: Year of construction							2005
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential						6
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential	14000					6
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential	10000
B1P011: Population density before intervention
B1P011: Population density before intervention	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
B1P012: Population density after intervention
B1P012: Population density after intervention	0.041379310344828	0	0	0	0	0.010714285714286	0
B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
B1P013: Residential	yes	no	yes	no	no	yes	yes
B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]							102795
B1P013: Office	yes	no	yes	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Industry and Utility	yes	yes	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Commercial	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Institutional	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Natural areas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Recreational	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Dismissed areas	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Other	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
B1P014: Residential	yes	yes	yes	no	no	yes	yes
B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]							102795
B1P014: Office	yes	yes	yes	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Industry and Utility	no	yes	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Commercial	yes	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Institutional	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Natural areas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Recreational	yes	yes	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Dismissed areas	no	no	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Other	no	yes	no	no	no	no	no
B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P003: Scale of action
B2P003: Scale			District	District	District
B2P004: Operator of the installation
B2P004: Operator of the installation
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?
B2P006: Other
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
B2P007: Other
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
B2P008: Other
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab				Academia, Private
B2P009: Other
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Other
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P017: Capacities
B2P017: Capacities
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders		Stakeholder participation supported by socio-economic research
B2P019: Available tools
B2P019: Available tools			Energy modelling
B2P019: Available tools
B2P020: External accessibility
B2P020: External accessibility
C1P001: Unlocking Factors
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	4 - Important
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	5 - Very important
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	4 - Important
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	2 - Slightly important
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	5 - Very important
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
C1P002: Driving Factors
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important
C1P002: Economic growth need	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
C1P003: Administrative barriers
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Lack of public participation	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	5 - Very important
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	5 - Very important
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	5 - Very important
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
C1P004: Policy barriers
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P005: Regulatory instability	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P005: Non-effective regulations	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives	5 - Very important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	4 - Important
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P006: Environmental barriers							- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 - Water Scarcity: 1
C1P007: Technical barriers
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important
C1P007: Deficient planning	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	4 - Important
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	4 - Important
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
C1P008: Inertia	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	4 - Important
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	5 - Very important
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	4 - Important
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P008: Rebound effect	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration	2 - Slightly important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	5 - Very important
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
C1P010: Financial barriers
C1P010: Hidden costs	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	3 - Moderately important
C1P010: Economic crisis	4 - Important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	4 - Important	4 - Important
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	4 - Important
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
C1P011: Market barriers
C1P011: Split incentives	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	5 - Very important
C1P011: Energy price distortion	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	5 - Very important	5 - Very important
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)	3 - Moderately important	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	3 - Moderately important	3 - Moderately important
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant	1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
C1P012: Stakeholders involved
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities	Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation					None
C1P012: Research & Innovation	Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation					None
C1P012: Financial/Funding	Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation					None
C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data	Planning/leading, Monitoring/operation/management					Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Business process management	Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation					Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: Urban Services providers	Planning/leading, Construction/implementation					Planning/leading
C1P012: Real Estate developers	Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation, Monitoring/operation/management					Planning/leading
C1P012: Design/Construction companies	Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation					Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens	Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation, Monitoring/operation/management					None
C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs	Planning/leading					Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce	Planning/leading, Design/demand aggregation, Construction/implementation					Planning/leading
C1P012: Other
C1P012: Other (if any)
Summary

Authors (framework concept)

Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

Contributors (to the content)

Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

Implemented by

Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

Join the Action

COST

PED-EU-NET

Action Details