Filters:
NameProjectTypeCompare
Örebro-Vivalla JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Texel JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hällefors, Sweden JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Uncompare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Uncompare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleHalmstad, Fyllinge
Vantaa, Aviapolis
Uden, Loopkantstraat
Võru +CityxChange
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabHalmstad, FyllingeVantaa, AviapolisUden, LoopkantstraatVõru +CityxChangeEspoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynoyesnoyesyes
PED relevant case studyyesyesyesnono
PED Lab.noyesnonono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralitynoyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusnonoyesnono
Energy communityyesnononono
Circularitynoyesnonono
Air quality and urban comfortnonononono
Electrificationnonoyesnono
Net-zero energy costnonononono
Net-zero emissionnononoyesno
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nonononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynonononoyes
Othernononoyesno
Other (A1P004)Sustainable Development; Energy neutral; Energy efficient; Carbon-free; Sustainable neighbourhood; Social aspects/affordability
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabPlanning PhasePlanning PhaseIn operationCompletedImplementation Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date01/2101/2306/1711/1809/19
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date01/3012/2705/2311/2310/22
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • General statistical datasets
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • General statistical datasets
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
    • Inger Andresen, Tonje Healey Trulsrud, Luca Finocchiaro, Alessandro Nocente, Meril Tamm, Joana Ortiz, Jaume Salom, Abel Magyari, Linda Hoes-van Oeffelen, Wouter Borsboom, Wim Kornaat, Niki Gaitani, Design and performance predictions of plus energy neighbourhoods – Case studies of demonstration projects in four different European climates, Energy and Buildings, Volume 274, 2022, 112447, ISSN 0378-7788, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112447. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778822006181),
    • Deliverable, Report: Integrated Energy Design for Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods (syn.ikia),
    • Deliverable, Report: DEMONSTRATION CASE OF SUSTAINABLE PLUS ENERGY NEIGHBOURHOODS IN MARINE CLIMATE (syn.ikia),
    • https://www.synikia.eu/no/bibliotek/
    • M. Hukkalainen, F. Zarrin, K. Klobut, O. Lindholm, M. Ranta, P. Hajduk, T. Vainio-Kaila, E. Wanne, J. Tartia, H. Horn, K. Kontu, J. Juhmen, S. Santala, R. Turtiainen, J. Töyräs, T. Koljonen. (2020). Deliverable D3.1 Detailed plan of the Espoo smart city lighthouse demonstrations. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2020-09/SPARCS_D3.1_Detailed_plan_Espoo.pdf,
    • Hukkalainen, Zarrin Fatima, Krzysztof Klobut, Kalevi Piira, Mikaela Ranta, Petr Hajduk, Tiina Vainio-Kaila , Elina Wanne, Jani Tartia, Angela Bartel, Joni Mäkinen, Mia Kaurila, Kaisa Kontu, Jaano Juhmen, Merja Ryöppy, Reetta Turtiainen, Joona Töyräs, Timo Koljonen (2021) Deliverable 3.2 Midterm report on the implemented demonstrations of solutions for energy positive blocks in Espoo. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2022-02/SPARCS_D3.2.pdf
    A1P011: Geographic coordinates
    X Coordinate (longitude):12.9205424.9588215.619126.99594824.8101
    Y Coordinate (latitude):56.6519460.30548851.660657.84581360.2179
    A1P012: Country
    A1P012: CountrySwedenFinlandNetherlandsEstoniaFinland
    A1P013: City
    A1P013: CityHalmstadVantaaUdenVõruEspoo
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).DwbDfbCfbDfbDfb
    A1P015: District boundary
    A1P015: District boundaryGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographic
    Other
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:MixedMixedPrivateMixed
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple Owners
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED25015
    A1P019: Conditioned space
    A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]2360267956
    A1P020: Total ground area
    A1P020: Total ground area [m²]3881000386022000053000
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area00105
    A1P022: Financial schemes
    A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estateyesyesyesnono
    A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]7804440
    A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononono
    A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernoyesnonono
    A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononono
    A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnonononono
    A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonononono
    A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnoyesnonono
    A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononono
    A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUyesyesnonoyes
    A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]629000
    A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonononono
    A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonononono
    A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononono
    A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022: OtherMultiple different funding schemes depending on the development site within the District and Lab.
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Job creation,
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local businesses
    A1P023: Other
    A1P024: More comments:
    A1P024: More comments:The project is a follow-up from the “Social Beautiful” concept which was developed in collaboration between Labyrint (Support in sheltered housing), Area (housing company), the municipality of Uden, and Hendriks Coppelmans (developer). The concept aims to provide an answer to changes in various policy areas and the changing demands of society. The Social Beautiful concept consists of the following elements: 1. Living, working, and community services are brought together in one location. A multifunctional residential and service centre is being realized at the location. 2. Housing is shaped by the realization of financially accessible homes suitable for the target group. The housing design is tailored to the target group. it may also include sheltered / protected living. 3. Work takes place at the location or from the same location. The work has a social function within the neighbourhood. Wage-related work must contribute to providing structure in the daily activities of the residents. 4. Neighbourhood management is organized from the location in the surrounding neighbourhood. A service package is provided from the residential and service centre that contributes to the ability of neighbourhood residents to live independently for longer, to strengthen the social network, and to improve the quality of life and safety in the neighbourhood. 5. The houses are suitable for use at all times for regular rental. Communal facilities must be realized within the contours of a regular apartment. The objective is to offer a suitable living and working situation to a group of vulnerable citizens. In this way they become a fully-fledged part of society. They not only make use of the facilities themselves, but also give substance to the level of facilities in the municipality. Due to the integrated approach, they experience a greater sense of well-being and security.
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]7804440
    Contact person for general enquiries
    A1P026: NameMarkus OlofsgårdEira LinkoTonje Healey TrulsrudChristoph GollnerJaano Juhmen
    A1P027: OrganizationAFRYCity of VantaaNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)FFGSIEMENS - Data Center Forum
    A1P028: AffiliationOtherMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityOtherSME / Industry
    A1P028: Other
    A1P029: Emailmarkus.olofsgard@afry.comeira.linko@vantaa.fitonje.h.trulsrud@ntnu.nochristoph.gollner@ffg.atJaano.juhmen@siemens.com
    Contact person for other special topics
    A1P030: Name
    A1P031: Email
    Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYes
    A2P001: Fields of application
    A2P001: Fields of application
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Digital technologies
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
    • Digital technologies,
    • Construction materials,
    • Other
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • Waste management,
    • Indoor air quality,
    • Construction materials
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy production
    A2P001: Other
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldslink based regulation of electricity gridPilot collaboration with landowners. Carbon footprint assessment and planning guidelines in zoning planning. Green infrastructure requirements. Examples of considered energy solutions: waste heat recovery and utilization, geothermal, air-water heat pumps, district heating return water, photovoltaics, A-class energy efficiency, smart control and monitoring, energy storages, E-mobility above national requirements, coolingEnergy efficiency: Energy efficient envelope, with good insulation, triple glazing windows and airtight envelope. (EPC = 0) Energy Flexibility: MCP controls for the heat pump in the apartments. Energy production: PV panels on the roof, Ground source heat pumps Waste management: construction waste was kept to a minimum and sorted and collected separately as much as possible. Indoor air quality: Exhaust ventilation and opening of windows Construction materials: low carbon emission building materials
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoNoYes
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNo
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceYesNo
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationThe calculation of the energy balance will be further developed and specified under the Neutralpath-project. Mobility related emissions are taken into account in the carbon footprint calculation of each zoning plan in the development area.not included
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]0.148
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.109
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P011: PVyesyesyesnono
    A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.058
    A2P011: Windnonononono
    A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Hydrononononono
    A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Biomass_elnonononono
    A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononono
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: PVT_elnonononono
    A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Othernonononono
    A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P012: Geothermalyesyesyesnono
    A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Solar Thermalnonononono
    A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Biomass_heatnonononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Waste heat+HPnoyesnonono
    A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: PVT_thnonononono
    A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Othernonononono
    A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes*Annual energy use below is presentedin primary energy consumption
    A2P014: Annual energy use
    A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]0.194
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]0.0368
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P017: Gasnonononono
    A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Coalnonononono
    A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Oilnonononono
    A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Othernonononono
    A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P018: PVnoyesnonono
    A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Windnoyesnonono
    A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Hydronoyesnonono
    A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_elnoyesnonono
    A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononono
    A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: PVT_elnonononono
    A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Othernonononono
    A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P019: Geothermalnonononono
    A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononono
    A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_heatnoyesnonono
    A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Waste heat+HPnoyesnonono
    A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononono
    A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: PVT_thnonononono
    A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononono
    A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Othernonononono
    A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary00000
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]-0.00043
    A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
    A2P022: Safety & SecurityPersonal Safety
    A2P022: HealthHealthy community
    A2P022: Education
    A2P022: MobilitySustainable mobility
    A2P022: EnergyNOn-renewable primary energy balance, renewable energy ratio, grid purchase factor, load cover factor/self-generation, supply cover factor/self-consumption, net energy/net power, peak delivered/peak expoted, total greenhouse gas emission
    A2P022: Water
    A2P022: Economic developmentcapital costs, operational cots, overall economic performance (5 KPIs)
    A2P022: Housing and Communitydemographic composition, diverse community, social cohesion
    A2P022: Waste
    A2P022: OtherSmartness and flecibility, Indoor Environmental Quality, Social performance - Equity (affordable housing, access to servicees and amenitioes, afforability of energy, living conditions, sustinable mobility, universal design)
    A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
    A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesyesyesnono
    A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnononoyesno
    A2P023: Wind Turbinesnonononono
    A2P023: Geothermal energy systemnoyesyesnono
    A2P023: Waste heat recoverynoyesnonono
    A2P023: Waste to energynoyesnonono
    A2P023: Polygenerationnoyesnonono
    A2P023: Co-generationnonononono
    A2P023: Heat Pumpnoyesyesnono
    A2P023: Hydrogennonononono
    A2P023: Hydropower plantnonononono
    A2P023: Biomassnoyesnonono
    A2P023: Biogasnonononono
    A2P023: OtherThe technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case.
    A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
    A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)yesyesnonono
    A2P024: Energy management systemnoyesyesnono
    A2P024: Demand-side managementyesyesyesnono
    A2P024: Smart electricity gridyesyesnonono
    A2P024: Thermal Storagenoyesnonono
    A2P024: Electric Storagenoyesnonono
    A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnoyesnoyesno
    A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsyesyesyesnono
    A2P024: P2P – buildingsnonononono
    A2P024: OtherThe technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case.
    A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
    A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnonononono
    A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnonononono
    A2P025: High-performance new buildingsnoyesyesnono
    A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)nonononono
    A2P025: Urban data platformsnonononono
    A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnonononono
    A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)noyesyesnono
    A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononono
    A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonononono
    A2P025: Smart surveillancenonononono
    A2P025: OtherThe technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case.
    A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
    A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)noyesnonono
    A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)noyesnonono
    A2P026: e-Mobilitynoyesnonono
    A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnoyesnonono
    A2P026: Car-free areanonononono
    A2P026: Other
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesNoYesYes
    A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEPC = 0, energy neutral building
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNo
    A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC)
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • New development strategies,
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Smart cities strategies,
    • Urban Renewal Strategies
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyCarbon-Neutral Vantaa by 2030 (min. 80 % reduction of yearly emissions, capture or compensation os the residual 20 %),
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    A3P003: Other
    A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
    A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    • Local trading
    • Innovative business models,
    • PPP models,
    • Life Cycle Cost,
    • Circular economy models
    A3P006: Other
    A3P007: Social models
    A3P007: Social models
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Citizen Social Research,
    • Policy Forums,
    • Quality of Life,
    • Strategies towards social mix,
    • Affordability,
    • Prevention of energy poverty,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
    • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Social incentives,
    • Quality of Life
    A3P007: Other
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    • Strategic urban planning
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • SECAP Updates
    A3P008: Other
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Carbon-free
    • Net zero carbon footprint,
    • Life Cycle approach,
    • Greening strategies,
    • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Carbon-free
    A3P009: Other
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionNeutralpath-project is working with the cocept of PCEDs = Positive and Clean Energy Districts (energy-efficient and energy-flexible districts with net zero greenhouse gas emissions and a surplus of renewable energy). Aviapolis Climate-Neutral Lab will work with both PCED and PCED relevant cases within the district.The demonstration projects is a new residential development, which consists of an apartment complex which includes 39 apartments spread over 3 floors. It is a sustainble plus energy neighbouhood, and has reached a plus energy balance on its first year in operation. It has MPC controls on the individual heat pumps to improve the energy flexibility of the apartments. It includes the "social beatiful" concepts with a strong emphasis on the social sustainability of the project.
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentAccording to Vantaa city strategy 2021-2025 Aviapolis area aims to become the greenest airport city in Europe. The district is transforming from a logistics and business focused area to a lively urban district which gives an opportunity to rethink the areas energy solutions. With Neutralpath-project Vantaa aims to support the development of the district's energy system and explore innovative, energy efficient and fossil free district energy solutions.The need for social housing and the ambition to create a great living environment with a high-performance apartment complex, supplied with renewable energy. It results in lower energy bills for the tenants and high-quality homes.
    B1P003: Environment of the case study area
    B2P003: Environment of the case study areaSuburban areaUrban areaSuburban area
    B1P004: Type of district
    B2P004: Type of district
    • New construction
    • New construction,
    • Renovation
    • New construction
    • Renovation
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    • New Development
    • Re-use / Transformation Area,
    • New Development
    • New Development
    • Retrofitting Area
    B1P006: Year of construction
    B1P006: Year of construction
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
    B1P011: Population density before intervention
    B1P011: Population density before intervention00000
    B1P012: Population density after intervention
    B1P012: Population density after intervention00000
    B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
    B1P013: Residentialnoyesnoyesno
    B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Officenoyesnonono
    B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Industry and Utilitynoyesnoyesno
    B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Commercialnoyesnoyesno
    B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Institutionalnoyesnonono
    B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Natural areasyesnonoyesno
    B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Recreationalnoyesnonono
    B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Dismissed areasnoyesnonono
    B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Othernononoyesno
    B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
    B1P014: Residentialnoyesyesyesno
    B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]2394
    B1P014: Officenoyesnonono
    B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Industry and Utilitynoyesnoyesno
    B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Commercialnoyesnoyesno
    B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Institutionalnoyesnonono
    B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Natural areasnononoyesno
    B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Recreationalnoyesnonono
    B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononono
    B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Othernononoyesno
    B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionNeutralpath-project is working with the cocept of PCEDs = Positive and Clean Energy Districts (energy-efficient and energy-flexible districts with net zero greenhouse gas emissions and a surplus of renewable energy). Aviapolis Climate-Neutral Lab will work with both PCED and PCED relevant cases within the district.
    B2P002: Installation life time
    B2P002: Installation life time
    B2P003: Scale of action
    B2P003: ScaleDistrictDistrict
    B2P004: Operator of the installation
    B2P004: Operator of the installationThe City of Vantaa manages the lab, working closely with landowners and other stakeholders such as energy companies, solution providers, universities and citizens.
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
    B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
    B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?Yes
    B2P006: Other
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    • Strategic
    B2P007: Other
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipality
    B2P008: Other
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    • Academia,
    • Private,
    • Industrial,
    • Citizens, public, NGO
    B2P009: Other
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    B2P011: Other
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    • Energy,
    • Environmental,
    • Social,
    • Economical / Financial
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P017: Capacities
    B2P017: Capacities
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P019: Available tools
    • Energy modelling
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P020: External accessibility
    B2P020: External accessibilityTo follow the lab and Vantaa's activities in Neutralpath, fill in the following form: https://neutralpath.eu/fi/tayta-lomake-liittyaksesi-cn-labiin/
    C1P001: Unlocking Factors
    C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)Real-estate market situation
    C1P002: Driving Factors
    C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Economic growth need1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
    C1P003: Administrative barriers
    C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)Delay in the Environmental Dialogue processing in the municipality
    C1P004: Policy barriers
    C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
    C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
    C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Regulatory instability1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Non-effective regulations1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
    C1P006: Environmental barriers
    C1P006: Environmental barriers
    C1P007: Technical barriers
    C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Deficient planning3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Lack of well-defined process1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
    C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
    C1P008: Inertia1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Rebound effect1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
    C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
    C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
    C1P010: Financial barriers
    C1P010: Hidden costs1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Risk and uncertainty2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
    C1P011: Market barriers
    C1P011: Split incentives1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Energy price distortion1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
    C1P012: Stakeholders involved
    C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Planning/leading
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    C1P012: Research & Innovation
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Financial/Funding
    C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Design/demand aggregation
    C1P012: Business process management
    • Design/demand aggregation
    C1P012: Urban Services providers
    • Design/demand aggregation
    C1P012: Real Estate developers
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Design/Construction companies
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
    • Design/demand aggregation
    C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
    • Construction/implementation
    • Construction/implementation
    C1P012: Other
    C1P012: Other (if any)
    Summary

    Authors (framework concept)

    Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

    Contributors (to the content)

    Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

    Implemented by

    Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
    Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)