Filters:
NameProjectTypeCompare
Örebro-Vivalla JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Texel JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hällefors, Sweden JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Uncompare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Uncompare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Uncompare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Uncompare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Uncompare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleHalmstad, Fyllinge
City of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block
Laser Valley – Land of Lights
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna
Groningen, PED North
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus
Findhorn, the Park
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabHalmstad, FyllingeCity of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva blockLaser Valley – Land of LightsZukunftsquartier, ViennaGroningen, PED NorthIstanbul, Ozyegin University CampusFindhorn, the Park
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynoyesyesyesnonoyes
PED relevant case studyyesnonononoyesno
PED Lab.nonononoyesnono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralitynonoyesyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusnononoyesyesnoyes
Energy communityyesnononoyesnoyes
Circularitynonononoyesnoyes
Air quality and urban comfortnononononoyesno
Electrificationnononononoyesyes
Net-zero energy costnonononononono
Net-zero emissionnonoyesnoyesnoyes
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nonononononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynoyesnonononoyes
Othernonoyesyesnoyesno
Other (A1P004)Energy efficient; Sustainable neighbourhood; Social aspects/affordabilityEnergy efficient; Economic feasibility ; High quality of living and comfort; Early and constant user integration for reaching the positive energy goal.almost nZEB district
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabPlanning PhaseIn operationIn operationPlanning PhaseImplementation PhaseImplementation PhaseIn operation
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date01/2106/1807/1812/1810/2401/62
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date01/3003/2212/2310/28
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • General statistical datasets
  • General statistical datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • GIS open datasets
  • General statistical datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
    • M. Hukkalainen, F. Zarrin, K. Klobut, O. Lindholm, M. Ranta, P. Hajduk, T. Vainio-Kaila, E. Wanne, J. Tartia, H. Horn, K. Kontu, J. Juhmen, S. Santala, R. Turtiainen, J. Töyräs, T. Koljonen. (2020). Deliverable D3.1 Detailed plan of the Espoo smart city lighthouse demonstrations. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2020-09/SPARCS_D3.1_Detailed_plan_Espoo.pdf,
    • Hukkalainen, Zarrin Fatima, Krzysztof Klobut, Kalevi Piira, Mikaela Ranta, Petr Hajduk, Tiina Vainio-Kaila , Elina Wanne, Jani Tartia, Angela Bartel, Joni Mäkinen, Mia Kaurila, Kaisa Kontu, Jaano Juhmen, Merja Ryöppy, Reetta Turtiainen, Joona Töyräs, Timo Koljonen (2021) Deliverable 3.2 Midterm report on the implemented demonstrations of solutions for energy positive blocks in Espoo. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2022-02/SPARCS_D3.2.pdf,
    • www.lippulaiva.fi
    • TNO, Hanze, RUG,
    • Ped noord book
        A1P011: Geographic coordinates
        X Coordinate (longitude):12.9205424.654326.02182616.3306656.53512129.258300-3.6099
        Y Coordinate (latitude):56.6519460.149144.29987448.21652153.23484641.03060057.6530
        A1P012: Country
        A1P012: CountrySwedenFinlandRomaniaAustriaNetherlandsTurkeyUnited Kingdom
        A1P013: City
        A1P013: CityHalmstadEspooMăgureleViennaGroningenIstanbulFindhorn
        A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
        A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).DwbDfbCfaCfbCfaCfaDwc
        A1P015: District boundary
        A1P015: District boundaryGeographicGeographicFunctionalGeographicGeographic
        Other
        A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
        A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:MixedPrivateMixedMixedMixedPrivateMixed
        A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
        A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple Owners
        A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
        A1P018: Number of buildings in PED2509715160
        A1P019: Conditioned space
        A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]1120001.01
        A1P020: Total ground area
        A1P020: Total ground area [m²]16500017.132285.400180000
        A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
        A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0100000
        A1P022: Financial schemes
        A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estateyesyesnonoyesyesyes
        A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
        A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernononoyesyesnono
        A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononononono
        A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnononoyesyesnoyes
        A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonononononono
        A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnonononoyesnono
        A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononono
        A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUyesyesnonoyesyesyes
        A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]308875
        A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonononononono
        A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonononononono
        A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonoyesnononono
        A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022: OtherBusiness angels
        A1P023: Economic Targets
        A1P023: Economic Targets
        • Boosting local and sustainable production
        • Job creation,
        • Positive externalities,
        • Boosting local businesses
        • Job creation
        • Boosting local businesses,
        • Boosting local and sustainable production
        • Positive externalities,
        • Boosting local and sustainable production,
        • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
        A1P023: Other
        A1P024: More comments:
        A1P024: More comments:The Espoonlahti district is located on the south-western coast of Espoo. With 56,000 inhabitants, it is the second largest of the Espoo city centres. The number of inhabitants is estimated to grow to 70,000 within the next 10 years. Espoonlahti will be a future transit hub of the south-western Espoo, along the metro line, and the increasing stream of passengers provides a huge potential for retail, business and residential developments. E-mobility solutions and last-mile services have strong potential in the area when subway extension is finished and running. The extensive (re)development of the Lippulaiva blocks make a benchmark catering to the everyday needs of residents. The completely new shopping centre is a state-of-the-art cross point with 20,000 daily customers and 10,000 daily commuters (3.5 million/year). The new underground metro line and station, and feeder line bus terminal, are fully integrated. Residential housing of approximately 550 new apartments will be built on top. Lippulaiva is a large traffic hub, directly connected to public transport and right next to the Länsiväylä highway and extensive cycle paths. Lippulaiva offers diverse, mixed-use services, such as a shopping mall, public services, a day care centre, residential apartment buildings, and underground parking facilities. Lippulaiva received the LEED Gold environmental certificate and Smart Building Gold certificate. • Flagship of sustainability • Cooling and heating demand from geothermal energy system (on-site) with energy storage system, 4 MW • PV panels: roof and façade, 630 kWp • Smart control strategies for electricity and thermal energy, smart microgrid-system and battery storage • Charging capacity for 134 EVsIn addition to having the most energy efficient academic building in Turkey, the university campus also has 3 buildings with LEED NC Campus certificate and LEED BD+C Gold certificate. In addition, it aims to continuously improve the energy efficiency objectives on campus in an innovative way. For this purpose, energy management and storage systems are being installed in the Dormitory 6 building, which is used as the demo area of the LEGOFIT project, for the purpose of turning it into a PED project.
        A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
        A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]1
        Contact person for general enquiries
        A1P026: NameMarkus OlofsgårdElina EkelundChristoph GollnerChristoph GollnerJasper Tonen, Elisabeth KoopsCem KeskinStefano Nebiolo
        A1P027: OrganizationAFRYCitycon OyjFFgFFGMunicipality of GroningenCenter for Energy, Environment and Economy, Ozyegin UniversityFindhorn Innovation Research and Education CIC
        A1P028: AffiliationOtherSME / IndustryOtherOtherMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / University
        A1P028: Other
        A1P029: Emailmarkus.olofsgard@afry.comElina.ekelund@citycon.comchritoph.gollner@ffg.atchristoph.gollner@ffg.atJasper.tonen@groningen.nlcem.keskin@ozyegin.edu.trstefanonebiolo@gmail.com
        Contact person for other special topics
        A1P030: NameElina EkelundM. Pınar Mengüç
        A1P031: EmailElina.ekelund@citycon.compinar.menguc@ozyegin.edu.tr
        Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
        A2P001: Fields of application
        A2P001: Fields of application
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production,
        • E-mobility,
        • Digital technologies
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production,
        • E-mobility,
        • Digital technologies
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy production
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production,
        • E-mobility,
        • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
        • Waste management
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production,
        • E-mobility,
        • Digital technologies,
        • Waste management,
        • Indoor air quality,
        • Construction materials
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production,
        • E-mobility,
        • Waste management
        A2P001: Other
        A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
        A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldslink based regulation of electricity gridEnergy efficiency: - eliminating waste energy utilizing smart energy system - utilizing excess heat from grocery stores Energy flexibility: - A battery energy storage system (1,5 MW/1,5MWh); Active participation in Nordpool electricity market (FCR-N) Energy production: - heating and cooling from geothermal heat pump system; 171 energy wells (over 51 km); heat capacity 4 MW - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Estimation of annual production is about 540 MWh (630 kWp) E-mobility - Installation of charging stations for electric vehicles (for 134 EVs) - e-bike services (warm storage room, charging cabinets for e-bikes) Digital technologies: - Building Analytics system by Schneider ElectricEnergy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streamsLEED NC Campus + LEGOFIT Project Energy Efficiency: Tri- generation, Compliance with ISO 50001, ASHRAE 90.1, energy efficient appliances, HVAC and lighting Energy flexibility: Energy demand management Energy production: Solar PVs Onsite + (to be installed more) E-mobility: EV Charging stations Indoor Air Quality: Energy Management System, Compliance with ASHRAE 62.1, ASHRAE 55 Construction materials: Passive systems, LEED certified buildings, innovative materials such as PCM Waste Management: Zero waste document
        A2P003: Application of ISO52000
        A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoYesNoYes
        A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
        A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesNoYes
        A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
        A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceYesNoNoNo
        A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
        A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationMobility is not included in the energy model.Mobility, till now, is not included in the energy model.Not included, the campus is a non car area except emergencies
        A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
        A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]5.52.3
        A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
        A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]5.80.331.2
        A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
        A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
        A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
        A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
        A2P011: PVyesyesnononoyesyes
        A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.54
        A2P011: Windnonononononoyes
        A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Hydrononononononono
        A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Biomass_elnonononononono
        A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
        A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: PVT_elnonononononono
        A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Othernonononononono
        A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
        A2P012: Geothermalyesyesnonoyesnono
        A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]5
        A2P012: Solar Thermalnonononoyesnoyes
        A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Biomass_heatnonononoyesnoyes
        A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.1
        A2P012: Waste heat+HPnonononoyesnoyes
        A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
        A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: PVT_thnonononoyesnono
        A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononoyes
        A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Othernonononononono
        A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
        A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesGeothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centers3x225 kW wind turbines + 100 kW PV
        A2P014: Annual energy use
        A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]11.33.51.2
        A2P015: Annual energy delivered
        A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]5.761.2
        A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
        A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]00
        A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
        A2P017: Gasnonononononono
        A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
        A2P017: Coalnonononononono
        A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
        A2P017: Oilnonononononono
        A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
        A2P017: Othernonononononono
        A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
        A2P018: PVnononononoyesno
        A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.00045547
        A2P018: Windnonononononono
        A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Hydrononononononono
        A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Biomass_elnonononononono
        A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
        A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
        A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Othernoyesnonononono
        A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]5.26
        A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
        A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
        A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
        A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Biomass_heatnonononononono
        A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
        A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
        A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
        A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
        A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Othernonononononono
        A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
        A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary01.053231939163500000
        A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
        A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]0
        A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
        A2P022: Safety & Security
        A2P022: Health
        A2P022: Education
        A2P022: Mobility
        A2P022: EnergyOn-site energy ratio
        A2P022: Water
        A2P022: Economic development
        A2P022: Housing and Community
        A2P022: Waste
        A2P022: Other
        A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
        A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesyesnoyesyesyesyes
        A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnonoyesnoyesnoyes
        A2P023: Wind Turbinesnononononoyesyes
        A2P023: Geothermal energy systemnoyesyesyesyesnono
        A2P023: Waste heat recoverynoyesnonoyesnoyes
        A2P023: Waste to energynonononoyesnono
        A2P023: Polygenerationnonononononono
        A2P023: Co-generationnononononoyesno
        A2P023: Heat Pumpnononoyesyesyesyes
        A2P023: Hydrogennonononononono
        A2P023: Hydropower plantnonononononono
        A2P023: Biomassnonononononoyes
        A2P023: Biogasnonononononono
        A2P023: Other
        A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
        A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)yesyesnonoyesyesno
        A2P024: Energy management systemnoyesnonoyesyesyes
        A2P024: Demand-side managementyesnononoyesyesno
        A2P024: Smart electricity gridyesyesnonononono
        A2P024: Thermal Storagenoyesnonoyesnoyes
        A2P024: Electric Storagenoyesnonoyesyesyes
        A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnonoyesyesyesyesyes
        A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsyesnononoyesyesno
        A2P024: P2P – buildingsnonononononono
        A2P024: Other
        A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
        A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnonononononono
        A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnonononoyesnono
        A2P025: High-performance new buildingsnoyesnonoyesyesyes
        A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)noyesnonoyesnono
        A2P025: Urban data platformsnonononoyesnono
        A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnonononononono
        A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)noyesnononoyesno
        A2P025: Smart irrigationnononononoyesno
        A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonononononono
        A2P025: Smart surveillancenononononoyesno
        A2P025: Other
        A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
        A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nonononononono
        A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)noyesnonononono
        A2P026: e-Mobilitynoyesnonoyesyesyes
        A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnononononoyesno
        A2P026: Car-free areanononononoyesno
        A2P026: OtherLocal transportation hub with direct connection to metro & bus terminal; parking spaces for 1,400 bicycles and for 1,300 cars Promoting e-Mobility: 134 charging stations, A technical reservation for expanding EV charging system 1400 bicycle racks and charging cabinets for 10 e-bicycle batteries
        A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
        A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
        A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
        A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesNoYesYesYes
        A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance Certificate => Energy efficiency class B (2018 version)Energy Performance Certificate
        A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
        A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoYesYes
        A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesLEED (Core & Shell, v4) GOLD certification, Smart Building certification (GOLD)LEED BD+C, LEED NC CAMPUS
        A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
        A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
        • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC)
        • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
        • New development strategies,
        • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
        • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
        • Smart cities strategies,
        • Urban Renewal Strategies,
        • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.)
        • Smart cities strategies
        • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
        • New development strategies,
        • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
        • Smart cities strategies,
        • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
        • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
        • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
        A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
        A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyRelevant city strategies behind PED development in Espoo include the following: - The Espoo Story: Sustainability is heavily included within the values and goals of the current Espoo city strategy, also known as the Espoo Story, running from 2021 to 2025. For example, the strategy names being a responsible pioneer as one of the main values of the city and has chosen achieving carbon neutrality by 2030 as one of the main goals of the current council term. In addition to the Espoo story, four cross-administrative development programmes act as cooperation platforms that allow the city, together with its partners, to develop innovative solutions through experiments and pilot projects in line with the Espoo Story. The Sustainable Espoo development programme is one of the four programmes, thus putting sustainability on the forefront in city development work. - EU Mission: 100 climate-neutral and smart cities by 2030: Cities selected for the Mission commit to achieving carbon-neutrality in 2030. A key tool in the Mission is the Climate City Contract. Each selected city will prepare and implement its contracts in collaboration with local businesses as well as other stakeholders and residents. - Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy: Espoo is committed to the Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy, under which the signatories commit to supporting the European Union’s 40% greenhouse gas emission reduction goal by 2030. The Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP) is a key instrument for implementing the agreement. The Action Plan outlines the key measures the city will take to achieve its carbon neutrality goal. The plan also includes a mapping of climate change risks and vulnerabilities, adaptation measures, emission calculations, emission reduction scenarios and impact estimations of measures. The SECAP of the City of Espoo is available here (only available in Finnish). - UN Sustainable development Goals: The city of Espoo has committed to becoming a forerunner and achieving the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) by 2025. The goal is to make Espoo financially, ecologically, socially, and culturally sustainable. - The Circular Cities Declaration: At the end of 2020, Espoo signed the Europe-wide circular economy commitment Circular Cities Declaration. The ten goals of the declaration promote the implementation of the city’s circular economy. - Espoo Clean Heat: Fortum and the City of Espoo are committed to producing carbon-neutral district heating in the network operating in the areas of Espoo, Kauniainen and Kirkkonummi during the 2020s. The district heating network provides heating to some 250,000 end-users in homes and offices. Coal will be completely abandoned in the production of district heating by 2025. The main targets related to PED development included in the noted city strategies are the following: - Espoo will achieve carbon neutrality by 2030. To be precise, this carbon neutrality goal is defined as an 80% emission reduction from the 1990 level by the year 2030. The remaining 20% share can be absorbed in carbon sinks or compensated by other means. - District heating in Espoo will be carbon-neutral by 2029, and coal-based production will be phased out from district heating by 2025. - Espoo aims to end the use of fossil fuels in the heating of city-owned buildings by 2025. - Quantitative goals within the Espoo SECAP report: - Espoo aims to reduce total energy consumption within the municipal sector by 7.5% by the end of 2025 in comparison to the 2015 level. The social housing company Espoon Asunnot OY aims to meet the same target. - Espoo aims to cover 10% of the energy consumption of new buildings via on-site production. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of cycling to 15% by 2024. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of public transport by 1.1% yearly. - Espoo aims to reduce the emissions of bus transport by 90% by the end of 2025, when compared to 2010 levels.
        A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
        A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
        • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
        • Electrification of Cooking Methods,
        • Biogas
        • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
        • Electrification of Cooking Methods
        • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
        A3P003: OtherBoiler Automation, Energy Management System, Electric Battery Storage, Demand Management and Flexible Pricing
        A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
        A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities- Citycon (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) aims to be carbon neutral in its energy use by 2030 - Lippulaiva is a unique urban centre with state-of-the-art energy concept. The centre has a smart managing system, which allows for example the temporary reduction of power used in air conditioning and charging stations when energy consumption is at its peak. In addition, a backup generator and a large electric battery will balance the operation of the electricity network. - Lippulaiva is also an important mobility hub for the people of Espoo. Espoonlahti metro station is located under the centre, and the West Metro started to operate to Espoonlahti in December 2022. Lippulaiva also has a bus terminal, which serves the metro’s feeder traffic in the Espoonlahti major district.Carbon and Energy Neutrality
        A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
        A3P005: Sustainable behaviourFor Citycon, it was important to engage local people within the Lippulaiva project. During the construction period as well as after opening of the shopping center, citizens have been engaged in multiple ways, such as informing local citizens of the progress of construction, engaging young people in the design processes of the shopping centre and long-term commitment of youngsters with Lippulaiva Buddy class initiative. Users’ engagement activities are conducted in close co-operation with SPARCS partners.In Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed.Under LEGOFIT project, promoting sustainable behavior for better occupant experience is a targeted aim under a work package.
        A3P006: Economic strategies
        A3P006: Economic strategies
        • Local trading
        • Innovative business models
        • Innovative business models,
        • Blockchain
        A3P006: Other
        A3P007: Social models
        A3P007: Social models
        • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
        • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
        • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
        • Citizen Social Research,
        • Prevention of energy poverty,
        • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
        • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
        • Quality of Life
        A3P007: Other
        A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
        A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
        • Strategic urban planning
        • Building / district Certification
        • Strategic urban planning,
        • District Energy plans,
        • City Vision 2050,
        • SECAP Updates
        • City Vision 2050,
        • SECAP Updates,
        • Building / district Certification
        A3P008: Other
        A3P009: Environmental strategies
        A3P009: Environmental strategies
        • Energy Neutral,
        • Carbon-free
        • Other
        • Energy Neutral
        • Energy Neutral,
        • Low Emission Zone,
        • Net zero carbon footprint,
        • Greening strategies,
        • Cool Materials
        • Energy Neutral,
        • Net zero carbon footprint
        A3P009: OtherCarbon free in terms of energy
        A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
        A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects- Energy efficiency regulations (Directive 2006/32/EC and 2009/72/EC) - EU directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings => all new buildings should be “nearly zero-energy buildings” (nZEB) from 2021At national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen:  Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation.  Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries.  The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals.  Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricityISO 45001, ISO 14001, ISO 50001, Zero Waste Policy
        B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
        B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionLippulaiva is a project with high level goal in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production.The campus should be considered a PED case study due to its exemplary commitment to sustainability and energy efficiency, as evidenced by several of its buildings achieving LEED certification. This certification underscores the campus's adherence to rigorous environmental standards and its proactive steps towards reducing carbon footprints. Also, the integration of sustainable practices across the campus aligns with the PED framework, which aims to create urban areas that produce more energy than they consume. Therefore, this campus serves as a model of how educational institutions can lead the way in fostering sustainable communities and advancing the goals of PED.
        B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
        B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development- Citycon’s (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) target is to be carbon neutral by 2030 - Increasing sustainability requirements from the financing, tenants, cities, other stakeholdersThe purpose of implementing the PED project on this sustainable campus, where several buildings have LEED certification, is to further enhance its energy efficiency and environmental stewardship by creating a district that generates more energy than it consumes. The initiator was motivated by the need to address climate change, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and promote renewable energy sources. Additionally, the campus's existing commitment to sustainability and the success of its LEED-certified buildings provided a strong foundation for demonstrating the feasibility and benefits of PED development, serving as a model for sustainable urban living and energy self-sufficiency.
        B1P003: Environment of the case study area
        B2P003: Environment of the case study areaSuburban areaUrban areaUrban areaSuburban areaRural
        B1P004: Type of district
        B2P004: Type of district
        • New construction
        • New construction
        • New construction,
        • Renovation
        • New construction,
        • Renovation
        • Renovation
        • New construction
        B1P005: Case Study Context
        B1P005: Case Study Context
        • New Development
        • Re-use / Transformation Area,
        • New Development
        • Re-use / Transformation Area,
        • New Development
        • New Development,
        • Retrofitting Area
        • Retrofitting Area
        • New Development
        B1P006: Year of construction
        B1P006: Year of construction20222024
        B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
        B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
        B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
        B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
        B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
        B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential9800
        B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
        B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential9800
        B1P011: Population density before intervention
        B1P011: Population density before intervention00000340
        B1P012: Population density after intervention
        B1P012: Population density after intervention0000034.3377715487040
        B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
        B1P013: Residentialnononoyesnonono
        B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Officenononoyesnonono
        B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Industry and Utilitynononoyesnonono
        B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Commercialnoyesnonononono
        B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Institutionalnononononoyesno
        B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]285.400
        B1P013: Natural areasyesyesnonononoyes
        B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Recreationalnonononononono
        B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Dismissed areasnonononononono
        B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Othernonononononono
        B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
        B1P014: Residentialnoyesyesyesnonoyes
        B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Officenonoyesyesnonoyes
        B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonoyesyesnonono
        B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Commercialnoyesnonononono
        B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Institutionalnononononoyesno
        B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]280000
        B1P014: Natural areasnonoyesnononoyes
        B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Recreationalnonoyesnononono
        B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononononono
        B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Othernonononononono
        B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
        B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionGroningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city.
        B2P002: Installation life time
        B2P002: Installation life timeThe MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact.
        B2P003: Scale of action
        B2P003: ScaleCityDistrictDistrict
        B2P004: Operator of the installation
        B2P004: Operator of the installationThe Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties.
        B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
        B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materialsGroningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materials
        B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
        B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?No
        B2P006: Other
        B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
        B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
        • Civic
        B2P007: Other
        B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
        B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipality
        B2P008: Other
        B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
        B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
        • Academia,
        • Private,
        • Industrial,
        • Other
        B2P009: Otherresearch companies, monitoring company, ict company
        B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
        B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
        B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
        B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
        • Buildings,
        • Demand-side management,
        • Energy storage,
        • Energy networks,
        • Waste management,
        • Lighting,
        • E-mobility,
        • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
        • Social interactions,
        • Business models
        B2P011: Other
        B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
        B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
        • Tools for prototyping and modelling
        B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
        B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
        B2P014: Monitoring measures
        B2P014: Monitoring measures
        • Execution plan,
        • Available data,
        • Type of measured data,
        • Equipment,
        • Level of access
        B2P015: Key Performance indicators
        B2P015: Key Performance indicators
        • Energy,
        • Social,
        • Economical / Financial
        B2P016: Execution of operations
        B2P016: Execution of operations
        B2P017: Capacities
        B2P017: Capacities
        B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
        B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
        B2P019: Available tools
        B2P019: Available tools
        • Energy modelling,
        • Social models,
        • Business and financial models
        B2P019: Available tools
        B2P020: External accessibility
        B2P020: External accessibility
        C1P001: Unlocking Factors
        C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
        C1P002: Driving Factors
        C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
        C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P002: Economic growth need1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
        C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)Earthquakes due to gas extraction
        C1P003: Administrative barriers
        C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
        C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
        C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
        C1P004: Policy barriers
        C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
        C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
        C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
        C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P005: Regulatory instability1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P005: Non-effective regulations1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
        C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
        C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
        C1P006: Environmental barriers
        C1P006: Environmental barriersAir Quality Management Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Energy Efficiency Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Water Conservation Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Waste Management Importance Level: 4 (Important) Material Selection Importance Level: 4 (Important) Renewable Energy Integration Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Heat Island Effect Mitigation Importance Level: 4 (Important) Noise Pollution Control Importance Level: 3 (Moderately Important)
        C1P007: Technical barriers
        C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Deficient planning3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Lack of well-defined process1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
        C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
        C1P008: Inertia1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P008: Rebound effect1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
        C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
        C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
        C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
        C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
        C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
        C1P010: Financial barriers
        C1P010: Hidden costs1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P010: Risk and uncertainty2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
        C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
        C1P011: Market barriers
        C1P011: Split incentives1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P011: Energy price distortion1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
        C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
        C1P012: Stakeholders involved
        C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Research & Innovation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Financial/Funding
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Business process management
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        • Planning/leading
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Urban Services providers
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • None
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Real Estate developers
        • Construction/implementation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Construction/implementation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Design/Construction companies
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        • Construction/implementation
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • None
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
        • Construction/implementation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Other
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Other (if any)
        Summary

        Authors (framework concept)

        Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

        Contributors (to the content)

        Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

        Implemented by

        Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
        Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)