Filters:
NameProjectTypeCompare
Örebro-Vivalla JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Texel JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hällefors, Sweden JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Uncompare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Uncompare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Uncompare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleGroningen, PED North
Vantaa, Aviapolis
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus
Fleuraye west, Carquefou
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabGroningen, PED NorthVantaa, AviapolisIzmir, District of KarşıyakaIstanbul, Kadikoy district, CaferagaIstanbul, Ozyegin University CampusFleuraye west, Carquefou
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynoyesyesyesnoyes
PED relevant case studynoyesnonoyesno
PED Lab.yesyesnononono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusyesnoyesnonono
Energy communityyesnonoyesnono
Circularityyesyesnononono
Air quality and urban comfortnonoyesnoyesno
Electrificationnonononoyesno
Net-zero energy costnonoyesnonono
Net-zero emissionyesnonononoyes
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nononononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynonoyesnonono
Othernonononoyesyes
Other (A1P004)almost nZEB districtEnergy neutral; Energy efficient; Social aspects/affordability; Sustainable neighbourhood
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabImplementation PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhaseImplementation PhaseCompleted
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date12/1801/2310/2201/2010/2401/13
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date12/2312/2710/2512/2210/2831/22
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • GIS open datasets
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • General statistical datasets
A1P009: OtherOther
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
  • TNO, Hanze, RUG,
  • Ped noord book
  • Alpagut, B., Lopez Romo, A., Hernández, P., Tabanoğlu, O., & Hermoso Martinez, N. (2021). A GIS-Based Multicriteria Assessment for Identification of Positive Energy Districts Boundary in Cities. Energies, 14(22), 7517.
    A1P011: Geographic coordinates
    X Coordinate (longitude):6.53512124.95882127.11004929.0263195268751729.258300-1.514197
    Y Coordinate (latitude):53.23484660.30548838.49605440.9884139524746141.03060047.298564
    A1P012: Country
    A1P012: CountryNetherlandsFinlandTurkeyTurkeyTurkeyFrance
    A1P013: City
    A1P013: CityGroningenVantaaİzmirIstanbulIstanbulCarquefou
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CfaDfbCsaCsbCfaCfb
    A1P015: District boundary
    A1P015: District boundaryFunctionalGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographic
    Other
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:MixedMixedPrivateMixedPrivatePublic
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerSingle Owner
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED7211315
    A1P019: Conditioned space
    A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]1.01102795116052
    A1P020: Total ground area
    A1P020: Total ground area [m²]17.1323881000326001151727285.400
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area003000
    A1P022: Financial schemes
    A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estateyesyesnonoyesno
    A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenononononono
    A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Otheryesyesnononono
    A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnononononono
    A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingyesnonononono
    A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnononononoyes
    A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingyesyesnononono
    A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernononononono
    A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUyesyesyesyesyesno
    A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]1193355
    A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonoyesnonono
    A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnononononono
    A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernononononono
    A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022: OtherMultiple different funding schemes depending on the development site within the District and Lab.
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Job creation,
    • Positive externalities,
    • Other
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production,
    • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
    • Boosting local businesses
    A1P023: OtherBoosting new investors to the area, - Increasing the touristic value of area and urban mobility at the area, - Increasing the regional value (housing price, etc.), - Providing economic advantages by switching to positive energy production
    A1P024: More comments:
    A1P024: More comments:In addition to having the most energy efficient academic building in Turkey, the university campus also has 3 buildings with LEED NC Campus certificate and LEED BD+C Gold certificate. In addition, it aims to continuously improve the energy efficiency objectives on campus in an innovative way. For this purpose, energy management and storage systems are being installed in the Dormitory 6 building, which is used as the demo area of the LEGOFIT project, for the purpose of turning it into a PED project.
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]1
    Contact person for general enquiries
    A1P026: NameJasper Tonen, Elisabeth KoopsEira LinkoOzlem SenyolMr. Dogan UNERICem KeskinChristoph Gollner
    A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of GroningenCity of VantaaKarsiyaka MunicipalityMunicipality of KadikoyCenter for Energy, Environment and Economy, Ozyegin UniversityFFG
    A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityOther
    A1P028: Other
    A1P029: EmailJasper.tonen@groningen.nleira.linko@vantaa.fiozlemkocaer2@gmail.comdogan.uneri@kadikoy.bel.trcem.keskin@ozyegin.edu.trchristoph.gollner@ffg.at
    Contact person for other special topics
    A1P030: NameHasan Burak CavkaMrs. Damla MUHCU YILMAZM. Pınar Mengüç
    A1P031: Emailhasancavka@iyte.edu.trdamla.muhcu@kadikoy.bel.trpinar.menguc@ozyegin.edu.tr
    Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYes
    A2P001: Fields of application
    A2P001: Fields of application
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
    • Waste management
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
    • Digital technologies,
    • Construction materials,
    • Other
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.)
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
    • Digital technologies
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Digital technologies,
    • Waste management,
    • Indoor air quality,
    • Construction materials
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy production,
    • Digital technologies,
    • Indoor air quality
    A2P001: Other
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streamsPilot collaboration with landowners. Carbon footprint assessment and planning guidelines in zoning planning. Green infrastructure requirements. Examples of considered energy solutions: waste heat recovery and utilization, geothermal, air-water heat pumps, district heating return water, photovoltaics, A-class energy efficiency, smart control and monitoring, energy storages, E-mobility above national requirements, coolingMethods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4). In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED.LEED NC Campus + LEGOFIT Project Energy Efficiency: Tri- generation, Compliance with ISO 50001, ASHRAE 90.1, energy efficient appliances, HVAC and lighting Energy flexibility: Energy demand management Energy production: Solar PVs Onsite + (to be installed more) E-mobility: EV Charging stations Indoor Air Quality: Energy Management System, Compliance with ASHRAE 62.1, ASHRAE 55 Construction materials: Passive systems, LEED certified buildings, innovative materials such as PCM Waste Management: Zero waste document
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoNoYesYesYes
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesNoYes
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNo
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationMobility, till now, is not included in the energy model.The calculation of the energy balance will be further developed and specified under the Neutralpath-project. Mobility related emissions are taken into account in the carbon footprint calculation of each zoning plan in the development area.Mobility is not included in the calculations.Not included, the campus is a non car area except emergencies
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]2.33.8620.94
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.331.2260.10
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P011: PVnoyesyesyesyesno
    A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]1.0280.51
    A2P011: Windnononononono
    A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Hydronononononono
    A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Biomass_elnononononono
    A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnononononono
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: PVT_elnononononono
    A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Othernononononono
    A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P012: Geothermalyesyesnononono
    A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Solar Thermalyesnonoyesnono
    A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.08
    A2P012: Biomass_heatyesnonononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.1
    A2P012: Waste heat+HPyesyesnononono
    A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: PVT_thyesnonononono
    A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Othernononononono
    A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesGeothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centersTwo scenarios are conducted regarding Kadikoy PED energy generation. For the second scenario, just 0.53GWh/annum PV production is proposed.
    A2P014: Annual energy use
    A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]5.0880.743.5
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]0.49
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
    A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P017: Gasnonoyesnonono
    A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Coalnononononono
    A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Oilnononononono
    A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Othernononononono
    A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P018: PVnoyesyesyesyesno
    A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.707-0.260.00045547
    A2P018: Windnoyesnononono
    A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Hydronoyesnononono
    A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_elnoyesnononono
    A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnononononono
    A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: PVT_elnononononono
    A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Othernononononono
    A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P019: Geothermalnononononono
    A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Solar Thermalnononononono
    A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_heatnoyesnononono
    A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Waste heat+HPnoyesnononono
    A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: PVT_thnononononono
    A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Othernononononono
    A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary001.4540311173975-2.269230769230800
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]
    A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
    A2P022: Safety & Security
    A2P022: Health
    A2P022: Education
    A2P022: Mobility
    A2P022: Energy
    A2P022: Water
    A2P022: Economic development
    A2P022: Housing and Community
    A2P022: Waste
    A2P022: Other
    A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
    A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesyesyesyesyesyes
    A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsyesnonoyesnono
    A2P023: Wind Turbinesnonononoyesno
    A2P023: Geothermal energy systemyesyesnononono
    A2P023: Waste heat recoveryyesyesnononono
    A2P023: Waste to energyyesyesnononono
    A2P023: Polygenerationnoyesnononono
    A2P023: Co-generationnonononoyesno
    A2P023: Heat Pumpyesyesyesyesyesno
    A2P023: Hydrogennononononono
    A2P023: Hydropower plantnononononono
    A2P023: Biomassnoyesnononono
    A2P023: Biogasnononononono
    A2P023: OtherThe technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case.
    A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
    A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)yesyesnonoyesno
    A2P024: Energy management systemyesyesnonoyesno
    A2P024: Demand-side managementyesyesnonoyesno
    A2P024: Smart electricity gridnoyesnononoyes
    A2P024: Thermal Storageyesyesnononono
    A2P024: Electric Storageyesyesnonoyesno
    A2P024: District Heating and Coolingyesyesnonoyesno
    A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsyesyesnonoyesno
    A2P024: P2P – buildingsnononononono
    A2P024: OtherThe technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case.
    A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
    A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnonoyesnonono
    A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsyesnonononono
    A2P025: High-performance new buildingsyesyesnonoyesyes
    A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)yesnonononono
    A2P025: Urban data platformsyesnonononono
    A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnononononono
    A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)noyesyesnoyesno
    A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononoyesno
    A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnononononono
    A2P025: Smart surveillancenonononoyesno
    A2P025: OtherThe technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case.
    A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
    A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)noyesnononono
    A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)noyesnononono
    A2P026: e-Mobilityyesyesnonoyesno
    A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnoyesnonoyesno
    A2P026: Car-free areanonononoyesno
    A2P026: Other
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesYesNoNoYes
    A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance Certificate
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoYesYes
    A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesLEED BD+C, LEED NC CAMPUS300 LOGEMENTS PASSIFS CERTIFIÉS PASSIVHAUS
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • New development strategies,
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • New development strategies,
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Urban Renewal Strategies,
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Smart cities strategies,
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Smart cities strategies,
    • Urban Renewal Strategies
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyCarbon-Neutral Vantaa by 2030 (min. 80 % reduction of yearly emissions, capture or compensation os the residual 20 %),Karşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030. System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023.
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
    • Electrification of Cooking Methods,
    • Biogas
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
    • Electrification of Cooking Methods
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
    • Electrification of Cooking Methods
    A3P003: OtherBoiler Automation, Energy Management System, Electric Battery Storage, Demand Management and Flexible Pricing
    A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
    A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesAccording to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario.Carbon and Energy Neutrality
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviourIn Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed.Under LEGOFIT project, promoting sustainable behavior for better occupant experience is a targeted aim under a work package.
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    • Innovative business models,
    • Blockchain
    • Innovative business models,
    • PPP models,
    • Life Cycle Cost,
    • Circular economy models
    • Innovative business models,
    • PPP models,
    • Circular economy models,
    • Demand management Living Lab,
    • Local trading
    • Circular economy models
    A3P006: Other
    A3P007: Social models
    A3P007: Social models
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Citizen Social Research,
    • Prevention of energy poverty,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Citizen Social Research,
    • Policy Forums,
    • Quality of Life,
    • Strategies towards social mix,
    • Affordability,
    • Prevention of energy poverty,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
    • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Affordability
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Citizen Social Research,
    • Prevention of energy poverty,
    • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
    • Quality of Life
    A3P007: Other
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • District Energy plans,
    • City Vision 2050,
    • SECAP Updates
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • SECAP Updates
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
    • District Energy plans,
    • SECAP Updates
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
    • District Energy plans,
    • City Vision 2050,
    • SECAP Updates
    • City Vision 2050,
    • SECAP Updates,
    • Building / district Certification
    A3P008: Other
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    • Energy Neutral
    • Net zero carbon footprint,
    • Life Cycle approach,
    • Greening strategies,
    • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Low Emission Zone,
    • Pollutants Reduction
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Low Emission Zone,
    • Net zero carbon footprint
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Low Emission Zone,
    • Net zero carbon footprint,
    • Greening strategies,
    • Cool Materials
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Net zero carbon footprint,
    • Carbon-free
    A3P009: Other
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsAt national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen:  Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation.  Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries.  The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals.  Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricityISO 45001, ISO 14001, ISO 50001, Zero Waste Policy
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionNeutralpath-project is working with the cocept of PCEDs = Positive and Clean Energy Districts (energy-efficient and energy-flexible districts with net zero greenhouse gas emissions and a surplus of renewable energy). Aviapolis Climate-Neutral Lab will work with both PCED and PCED relevant cases within the district.The pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED).The campus should be considered a PED case study due to its exemplary commitment to sustainability and energy efficiency, as evidenced by several of its buildings achieving LEED certification. This certification underscores the campus's adherence to rigorous environmental standards and its proactive steps towards reducing carbon footprints. Also, the integration of sustainable practices across the campus aligns with the PED framework, which aims to create urban areas that produce more energy than they consume. Therefore, this campus serves as a model of how educational institutions can lead the way in fostering sustainable communities and advancing the goals of PED.
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentAccording to Vantaa city strategy 2021-2025 Aviapolis area aims to become the greenest airport city in Europe. The district is transforming from a logistics and business focused area to a lively urban district which gives an opportunity to rethink the areas energy solutions. With Neutralpath-project Vantaa aims to support the development of the district's energy system and explore innovative, energy efficient and fossil free district energy solutions.The purpose of implementing the PED project on this sustainable campus, where several buildings have LEED certification, is to further enhance its energy efficiency and environmental stewardship by creating a district that generates more energy than it consumes. The initiator was motivated by the need to address climate change, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and promote renewable energy sources. Additionally, the campus's existing commitment to sustainability and the success of its LEED-certified buildings provided a strong foundation for demonstrating the feasibility and benefits of PED development, serving as a model for sustainable urban living and energy self-sufficiency.
    B1P003: Environment of the case study area
    B2P003: Environment of the case study areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban areaSuburban area
    B1P004: Type of district
    B2P004: Type of district
    • New construction,
    • Renovation
    • Renovation
    • Renovation
    • Renovation
    • New construction
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    • Re-use / Transformation Area,
    • New Development
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Re-use / Transformation Area,
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Retrofitting Area
    • New Development
    B1P006: Year of construction
    B1P006: Year of construction20052024
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential23.379
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential9800
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential9800
    B1P011: Population density before intervention
    B1P011: Population density before intervention0000340
    B1P012: Population density after intervention
    B1P012: Population density after intervention000034.3377715487040
    B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
    B1P013: Residentialnoyesyesyesnono
    B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]102795
    B1P013: Officenoyesnoyesnono
    B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Industry and Utilitynoyesnononono
    B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Commercialnoyesnoyesnono
    B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Institutionalnoyesnonoyesno
    B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]285.400
    B1P013: Natural areasnononononono
    B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Recreationalnoyesnononono
    B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Dismissed areasnoyesnononono
    B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Othernononoyesnono
    B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]Cultural Center, Sports Center / Total building and land use data of neigborhood 13,878 residential, 4,441 commercial using before intervention. For project area & 49 building area m2
    B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
    B1P014: Residentialnoyesyesyesnoyes
    B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]102795
    B1P014: Officenoyesnoyesnono
    B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Industry and Utilitynoyesnononoyes
    B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]10000
    B1P014: Commercialnoyesnoyesnoyes
    B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Institutionalnoyesnonoyesno
    B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]280000
    B1P014: Natural areasnononononono
    B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Recreationalnoyesnononoyes
    B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Dismissed areasnononononono
    B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Othernononoyesnono
    B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionGroningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city.Neutralpath-project is working with the cocept of PCEDs = Positive and Clean Energy Districts (energy-efficient and energy-flexible districts with net zero greenhouse gas emissions and a surplus of renewable energy). Aviapolis Climate-Neutral Lab will work with both PCED and PCED relevant cases within the district.
    B2P002: Installation life time
    B2P002: Installation life timeThe MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact.
    B2P003: Scale of action
    B2P003: ScaleDistrictDistrictDistrict
    B2P004: Operator of the installation
    B2P004: Operator of the installationThe Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties.The City of Vantaa manages the lab, working closely with landowners and other stakeholders such as energy companies, solution providers, universities and citizens.
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materialsGroningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materials
    B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
    B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?No
    B2P006: Other
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    • Civic
    • Strategic
    B2P007: Other
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipalityMunicipality
    B2P008: Other
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    • Academia,
    • Private,
    • Industrial,
    • Other
    • Academia,
    • Private,
    • Industrial,
    • Citizens, public, NGO
    B2P009: Otherresearch companies, monitoring company, ict company
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    • Buildings,
    • Demand-side management,
    • Energy storage,
    • Energy networks,
    • Waste management,
    • Lighting,
    • E-mobility,
    • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
    • Social interactions,
    • Business models
    B2P011: Other
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    • Tools for prototyping and modelling
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    • Execution plan,
    • Available data,
    • Type of measured data,
    • Equipment,
    • Level of access
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    • Energy,
    • Social,
    • Economical / Financial
    • Energy,
    • Environmental,
    • Social,
    • Economical / Financial
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P017: Capacities
    B2P017: Capacities
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P019: Available tools
    • Energy modelling,
    • Social models,
    • Business and financial models
    • Energy modelling
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P020: External accessibility
    B2P020: External accessibilityTo follow the lab and Vantaa's activities in Neutralpath, fill in the following form: https://neutralpath.eu/fi/tayta-lomake-liittyaksesi-cn-labiin/
    C1P001: Unlocking Factors
    C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)Real-estate market situation
    C1P002: Driving Factors
    C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)Earthquakes due to gas extraction
    C1P003: Administrative barriers
    C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
    C1P004: Policy barriers
    C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
    C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
    C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Non-effective regulations3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
    C1P006: Environmental barriers
    C1P006: Environmental barriers- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 - Water Scarcity: 1Air Quality Management Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Energy Efficiency Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Water Conservation Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Waste Management Importance Level: 4 (Important) Material Selection Importance Level: 4 (Important) Renewable Energy Integration Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Heat Island Effect Mitigation Importance Level: 4 (Important) Noise Pollution Control Importance Level: 3 (Moderately Important)
    C1P007: Technical barriers
    C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Deficient planning2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Lack of well-defined process3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
    C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
    C1P008: Inertia2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Rebound effect2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
    C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
    C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
    C1P010: Financial barriers
    C1P010: Hidden costs2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Risk and uncertainty3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
    C1P011: Market barriers
    C1P011: Split incentives5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Energy price distortion4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
    C1P012: Stakeholders involved
    C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Research & Innovation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Financial/Funding
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Business process management
    • Planning/leading
    • None
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Urban Services providers
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Real Estate developers
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Design/Construction companies
    • Construction/implementation
    • Construction/implementation
    • Construction/implementation
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
    • None
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Other
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Other (if any)
    Summary

    Authors (framework concept)

    Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

    Contributors (to the content)

    Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

    Implemented by

    Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
    Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)