Filters:
NameProjectTypeCompare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Uncompare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Uncompare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Uncompare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Uncompare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleGroningen, PED North
Oslo, Verksbyen
Romania, Alba Iulia PED
Évora, Portugal
Uden, Loopkantstraat
Trenčín
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabGroningen, PED NorthOslo, VerksbyenRomania, Alba Iulia PEDÉvora, PortugalUden, LoopkantstraatTrenčínIzmir, District of Karşıyaka
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynoyesyesnonoyesyes
PED relevant case studynononoyesyesnono
PED Lab.yesnonoyesnonono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesyesnoyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
Energy communityyesnoyesyesnoyesno
Circularityyesnononononono
Air quality and urban comfortnoyesyesnononoyes
Electrificationnonoyesnoyesnono
Net-zero energy costnonononononoyes
Net-zero emissionyesyesnonononono
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nonoyesnonoyesno
Maximise self-sufficiencynonoyesnononoyes
Othernonononononono
Other (A1P004)
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabImplementation PhaseImplementation PhaseImplementation PhaseImplementation PhaseIn operationPlanning PhasePlanning Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date12/1807/1801/2410/1906/1706/1910/22
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date12/2308/2412/2609/2405/2311/2310/25
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
A1P009: OtherOther
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
  • TNO, Hanze, RUG,
  • Ped noord book
  • Historical sources,
  • GIS of the municipality,
  • Basic BEMs
  • Inger Andresen, Tonje Healey Trulsrud, Luca Finocchiaro, Alessandro Nocente, Meril Tamm, Joana Ortiz, Jaume Salom, Abel Magyari, Linda Hoes-van Oeffelen, Wouter Borsboom, Wim Kornaat, Niki Gaitani, Design and performance predictions of plus energy neighbourhoods – Case studies of demonstration projects in four different European climates, Energy and Buildings, Volume 274, 2022, 112447, ISSN 0378-7788, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112447. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778822006181),
  • Deliverable, Report: Integrated Energy Design for Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods (syn.ikia),
  • Deliverable, Report: DEMONSTRATION CASE OF SUSTAINABLE PLUS ENERGY NEIGHBOURHOODS IN MARINE CLIMATE (syn.ikia),
  • https://www.synikia.eu/no/bibliotek/
A1P011: Geographic coordinates
X Coordinate (longitude):6.53512110.98617335443299223.580112098023235-7.9093775.619118.04687051544292227.110049
Y Coordinate (latitude):53.23484659.2242971664204646.07701527868011538.57080451.660648.89925138034027438.496054
A1P012: Country
A1P012: CountryNetherlandsNorwayRomaniaPortugalNetherlandsSlovakiaTurkey
A1P013: City
A1P013: CityGroningenFredrikstadAlba IuliaÉvoraUdenTrencinİzmir
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CfaCfbDfbCsaCfbCfbCsa
A1P015: District boundary
A1P015: District boundaryFunctionalGeographicFunctionalGeographicGeographicFunctionalGeographic
OtherGeographic
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:MixedPrivatePublicMixedPrivateMixedPrivate
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersSingle OwnerSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple Owners
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED72611021
A1P019: Conditioned space
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]1.01355023602000102795
A1P020: Total ground area
A1P020: Total ground area [m²]17.1328423.4538607500032600
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0000103
A1P022: Financial schemes
A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estateyesyesnonoyesyesno
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]7804440
A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Otheryesnononononono
A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonoyesnonoyesno
A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingyesnoyesnononono
A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonoyesnononono
A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingyesnoyesnonoyesno
A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernononononoyesno
A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUyesnonoyesnonoyes
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]199982751193355
A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonononononoyes
A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonononononono
A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononono
A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022: Other
A1P023: Economic Targets
A1P023: Economic Targets
  • Boosting local businesses,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
  • Job creation,
  • Positive externalities,
  • Other
  • Boosting local businesses,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
  • Positive externalities,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
A1P023: OtherBoosting sustainability for public schools
A1P024: More comments:
A1P024: More comments:The total development consists of more than 1500 dwellings, a kindergarten, a school, and commercial buildings. Two of the residential blocks are included as demonstration projects in syn.ikia. The two blocks have 20 dwellings in each and are 6 stories high.The project is a follow-up from the “Social Beautiful” concept which was developed in collaboration between Labyrint (Support in sheltered housing), Area (housing company), the municipality of Uden, and Hendriks Coppelmans (developer). The concept aims to provide an answer to changes in various policy areas and the changing demands of society. The Social Beautiful concept consists of the following elements: 1. Living, working, and community services are brought together in one location. A multifunctional residential and service centre is being realized at the location. 2. Housing is shaped by the realization of financially accessible homes suitable for the target group. The housing design is tailored to the target group. it may also include sheltered / protected living. 3. Work takes place at the location or from the same location. The work has a social function within the neighbourhood. Wage-related work must contribute to providing structure in the daily activities of the residents. 4. Neighbourhood management is organized from the location in the surrounding neighbourhood. A service package is provided from the residential and service centre that contributes to the ability of neighbourhood residents to live independently for longer, to strengthen the social network, and to improve the quality of life and safety in the neighbourhood. 5. The houses are suitable for use at all times for regular rental. Communal facilities must be realized within the contours of a regular apartment. The objective is to offer a suitable living and working situation to a group of vulnerable citizens. In this way they become a fully-fledged part of society. They not only make use of the facilities themselves, but also give substance to the level of facilities in the municipality. Due to the integrated approach, they experience a greater sense of well-being and security.
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]3.578044400
Contact person for general enquiries
A1P026: NameJasper Tonen, Elisabeth KoopsTonje Healey TrulsrudTudor DrâmbăreanJoão Bravo DiasTonje Healey TrulsrudVladimír ŠkolaOzlem Senyol
A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of GroningenNorwegian University of Science and technology (NTNU)Municipality of Alba IuliaEDP LabelecNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)City of TrencinKarsiyaka Municipality
A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public BodiesSME / IndustryResearch Center / UniversityOtherMunicipality / Public Bodies
A1P028: OtherMaria Elena SeemannProject Manager
A1P029: EmailJasper.tonen@groningen.nltonje.h.trulsrud@ntnu.notudor.drambarean@apulum.rojoao.bravodias@edp.pttonje.h.trulsrud@ntnu.novladimir.skola@trencin.skozlemkocaer2@gmail.com
Contact person for other special topics
A1P030: NameMaria-Elena SeemannVladimír ŠkolaHasan Burak Cavka
A1P031: Emailmaria.seemann@apulum.roapulvladimir.skola@trencin.skhasancavka@iyte.edu.tr
Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
A2P001: Fields of application
A2P001: Fields of application
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
  • Waste management
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
  • Digital technologies,
  • Indoor air quality
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
  • Digital technologies,
  • Construction materials
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Digital technologies,
  • Waste management,
  • Construction materials
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • Waste management,
  • Indoor air quality,
  • Construction materials
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.)
A2P001: Other
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streamsEnergy efficiency: energy-efficient buildings that comply with the Norwegian Passive House standard. Energy Flexibility: sharing of PV energy between the dwellings Energy production: BIPV on the roof and facades, and a ground source heat pump for thermal energy. E-mobility: EV charging Urban comfort: a large green park in the neighbourhood with a small lake and recreational areas Digital technologies: Smart Home Systems for lighting, heating and ventilation Indoor air quality: balanced ventilationThermal rehabilitation of the main building, and investments in the energy efficiency and consumption fields.Energy efficiency: Energy efficient envelope, with good insulation, triple glazing windows and airtight envelope. (EPC = 0) Energy Flexibility: MCP controls for the heat pump in the apartments. Energy production: PV panels on the roof, Ground source heat pumps Waste management: construction waste was kept to a minimum and sorted and collected separately as much as possible. Indoor air quality: Exhaust ventilation and opening of windows Construction materials: low carbon emission building materialsMethods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4). In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED.
A2P003: Application of ISO52000
A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoYesYesNoYesYes
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoYesYesNoYes
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNoYesNoNo
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationMobility, till now, is not included in the energy model.There will be 1 EV station placed nearby the main building. This would be the link to the mobility field.not includedMobility is not included in the calculations.
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]2.30.160.9820.1483.862
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.330.0530.0484410.1091.226
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P011: PVnoyesyesnoyesnoyes
A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.180.0581.028
A2P011: Windnonononononono
A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Hydrononononononono
A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_elnonononononono
A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: PVT_elnonononononono
A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Othernonononononono
A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P012: Geothermalyesnononoyesnono
A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Solar Thermalyesnononononono
A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_heatyesnononononono
A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.1
A2P012: Waste heat+HPyesnononononono
A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: PVT_thyesnononononono
A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Othernonoyesnononono
A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesGeothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centersOnly PVs - 940 PVs on the main building*Annual energy use below is presentedin primary energy consumption
A2P014: Annual energy use
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]0.0000484410.1945.088
A2P015: Annual energy delivered
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]0.0001133310.0368
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P017: Gasnonononononoyes
A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Coalnonononononono
A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Oilnonononononono
A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Othernonoyesnononono
A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P018: PVnonononononoyes
A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.707
A2P018: Windnonononononono
A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Hydrononononononono
A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_elnonononononono
A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Othernonoyesnononono
A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_heatnonononononono
A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Othernonoyesnononono
A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary0000001.4540311173975
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]-6.035-0.00043
A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
A2P022: Safety & SecurityPersonal SafetyyesPersonal Safety
A2P022: HealthHealthy community + Indoor Evironmental Quality (indoor air quality, thermal comfort, lighting and visual comfort)yesHealthy community
A2P022: Educationyes
A2P022: MobilitySustainable mobilityyesSustainable mobility
A2P022: EnergyEnergy and environmental performance (non-renewable primary energy balance, renewable energy ratio, grid purchase factor, load cover factor/self-generation, supply cover factor/ self-consumption, net energy/net power. peak delivered(peak exported power, connection capacity credit, total greenhouse gas emissionsyesNOn-renewable primary energy balance, renewable energy ratio, grid purchase factor, load cover factor/self-generation, supply cover factor/self-consumption, net energy/net power, peak delivered/peak expoted, total greenhouse gas emission
A2P022: Wateryes
A2P022: Economic developmentEconomic Performance: capital costs, operational costs, overall performanceyescapital costs, operational cots, overall economic performance (5 KPIs)
A2P022: Housing and Communitydemopraphic composiiton, diverse community, social cohesion access to amenities, access to services, afordability of energy, affordability of shousing, living conditions, universal design, energy consciousnessdemographic composition, diverse community, social cohesion
A2P022: Waste
A2P022: OtherSmartness and FlexibilitySmartness and flecibility, Indoor Environmental Quality, Social performance - Equity (affordable housing, access to servicees and amenitioes, afforability of energy, living conditions, sustinable mobility, universal design)
A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesyesyesyesyesnoyes
A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsyesnoyesyesnonono
A2P023: Wind Turbinesnonononononono
A2P023: Geothermal energy systemyesyesnonoyesnono
A2P023: Waste heat recoveryyesnononononono
A2P023: Waste to energyyesnononononono
A2P023: Polygenerationnonoyesnononono
A2P023: Co-generationnonoyesnononono
A2P023: Heat Pumpyesyesyesnoyesnoyes
A2P023: Hydrogennonononononono
A2P023: Hydropower plantnonononononono
A2P023: Biomassnonononononono
A2P023: Biogasnonononononono
A2P023: Other
A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)yesyesyesyesnonono
A2P024: Energy management systemyesyesyesyesyesyesno
A2P024: Demand-side managementyesyesyesnoyesnono
A2P024: Smart electricity gridnonoyesyesnonono
A2P024: Thermal Storageyesnonoyesnoyesno
A2P024: Electric Storageyesnoyesyesnoyesno
A2P024: District Heating and Coolingyesnonononoyesno
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsyesyesyesyesyesnono
A2P024: P2P – buildingsnonoyesyesnonono
A2P024: Other
A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnonoyesnonoyesyes
A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsyesnonoyesnoyesno
A2P025: High-performance new buildingsyesyesnonoyesnono
A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)yesnoyesnononono
A2P025: Urban data platformsyesnoyesyesnonono
A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnononoyesnonono
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)noyesyesyesyesyesyes
A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononononono
A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnononoyesnonono
A2P025: Smart surveillancenononoyesnonono
A2P025: Other
A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nonoyesnononono
A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)nonoyesnononono
A2P026: e-Mobilityyesnoyesyesnonono
A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnononoyesnonono
A2P026: Car-free areanonononononono
A2P026: Other
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notesThe new mobility plan integrates the PED areaSUMP AVAILABLE
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesYesYesNoYesNo
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance CertificateNS3700 Norwegian Passive HouseEPC = 0, energy neutral building
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesYesNoNoNo
A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • New development strategies,
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Smart cities strategies,
  • Urban Renewal Strategies,
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • New development strategies,
  • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy40% reduction in emissions by 2030 according to the Covenant of MayorsKarşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030. System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023.
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
  • Electrification of Cooking Methods,
  • Biogas
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
A3P003: OtherSECAP developed in 2023
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities- Thermal rehabilitation - Heat pumps - Smart system capable o various connections and data export - Usage of the energy produced by PVs placed on 3 buildings within the PEDSELF SUSTAINABILITY, SELF EFFICIENCYAccording to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario.
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
A3P005: Sustainable behaviourIn Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed.- Education - Replacement of the non-performant PVs - Professional maintenance of the PV system - Reduce of consumptions - Intelligent systems to recover heat - Intelligent system to permit the usage of domestic water from the heating systemBASED ON SECAP DEVELOPED IN 2023
A3P006: Economic strategies
A3P006: Economic strategies
  • Innovative business models,
  • Blockchain
  • Open data business models,
  • Innovative business models,
  • Life Cycle Cost,
  • Circular economy models,
  • Demand management Living Lab
A3P006: Other
A3P007: Social models
A3P007: Social models
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Citizen Social Research,
  • Prevention of energy poverty,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
  • Citizen Social Research,
  • Policy Forums,
  • Social incentives,
  • Quality of Life,
  • Strategies towards social mix,
  • Affordability,
  • Prevention of energy poverty,
  • Digital Inclusion,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
  • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Social incentives,
  • Quality of Life
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Affordability
A3P007: Other
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
  • Strategic urban planning,
  • District Energy plans,
  • City Vision 2050,
  • SECAP Updates
  • Strategic urban planning,
  • District Energy plans,
  • City Vision 2050,
  • SECAP Updates,
  • Building / district Certification
  • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
  • District Energy plans,
  • SECAP Updates
A3P008: Other
A3P009: Environmental strategies
A3P009: Environmental strategies
  • Energy Neutral
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone,
  • Net zero carbon footprint,
  • Carbon-free,
  • Life Cycle approach,
  • Pollutants Reduction,
  • Greening strategies,
  • Sustainable Urban drainage systems (SUDS),
  • Cool Materials,
  • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone,
  • Pollutants Reduction
A3P009: Other
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsAt national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen:  Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation.  Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries.  The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals.  Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricity
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionThe case study follows the concept of syn.ikia with sustainable plus energy neighbourhoods (SPEN) and aims to reach a plus energy balance based on EPB uses on an annual basis.Positive energy districtThe PED main objective is to achieve the energy transition while preserving cultural heritage and improving citizen’s quality of life.The demonstration projects is a new residential development, which consists of an apartment complex which includes 39 apartments spread over 3 floors. It is a sustainble plus energy neighbouhood, and has reached a plus energy balance on its first year in operation. It has MPC controls on the individual heat pumps to improve the energy flexibility of the apartments. It includes the "social beatiful" concepts with a strong emphasis on the social sustainability of the project.GOOD MIX OF PUBLIC PRIVATE BUILDINGSThe pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED).
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentThe developers call their concept for Future Living, where the neighbourhood consist of highly energy-efficient buildings, is supplied with renewable energy onsite and includes green areas for well-being.Creation of an area which aims to be sustainable in terms of energy sufficiency and efficiency.POCITYF brings together eight cities (Lightouse and Fellow cities), all having cultural heritage areas in their territory. All are intrinsically motivated to participate in the necessary energy transition not only for their conventional city districts of mixed-used, but also for districts with individually specificities as those belonging in their cultural heritage, which at the moment may be acting as barriers for their further environmental sustainability, but after POCITYF will be acting as a promising building retrofits roadmap for similar and other EU cities.The need for social housing and the ambition to create a great living environment with a high-performance apartment complex, supplied with renewable energy. It results in lower energy bills for the tenants and high-quality homes.Replication of unique PED know how
B1P003: Environment of the case study area
B2P003: Environment of the case study areaSuburban areaUrban areaUrban areaSuburban areaUrban areaUrban area
B1P004: Type of district
B2P004: Type of district
  • New construction
  • Renovation
  • Renovation
  • New construction
  • New construction,
  • Renovation
  • Renovation
B1P005: Case Study Context
B1P005: Case Study Context
  • New Development
  • Retrofitting Area
  • Preservation Area
  • New Development
  • Retrofitting Area
  • Retrofitting Area
B1P006: Year of construction
B1P006: Year of construction19762005
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P011: Population density before intervention
B1P011: Population density before intervention0000000
B1P012: Population density after intervention
B1P012: Population density after intervention0000000
B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
B1P013: Residentialnonononononoyes
B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]102795
B1P013: Officenonononononono
B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Industry and Utilitynoyesnonononono
B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]whole site was used for idustry and excavation
B1P013: Commercialnonononononono
B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Institutionalnonoyesnononono
B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Natural areasnonononononono
B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Recreationalnonononononono
B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Dismissed areasnonononononono
B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Othernonononononono
B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
B1P014: Residentialnoyesnonoyesnoyes
B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]2394102795
B1P014: Officenonononononono
B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Commercialnonononononono
B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Institutionalnonoyesnononono
B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Natural areasnonononononono
B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Recreationalnonononononono
B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononononono
B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Othernonononononono
B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionGroningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city.
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P002: Installation life timeThe MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact.
B2P003: Scale of action
B2P003: ScaleDistrictDistrict
B2P004: Operator of the installation
B2P004: Operator of the installationThe Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties.
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materialsGroningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materials
B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?No
B2P006: Other
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
  • Civic
B2P007: Other
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipality
B2P008: Other
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
  • Academia,
  • Private,
  • Industrial,
  • Other
B2P009: Otherresearch companies, monitoring company, ict company
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
  • Buildings,
  • Demand-side management,
  • Energy storage,
  • Energy networks,
  • Waste management,
  • Lighting,
  • E-mobility,
  • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
  • Social interactions,
  • Business models
  • Buildings,
  • Demand-side management,
  • Prosumers,
  • Renewable generation,
  • Energy storage,
  • Energy networks,
  • Waste management,
  • E-mobility,
  • Social interactions,
  • Circular economy models
B2P011: Other
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
  • Tools for prototyping and modelling
  • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
  • Tools for prototyping and modelling,
  • Tools, spaces, events for testing and validation
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P014: Monitoring measures
  • Execution plan,
  • Available data,
  • Type of measured data,
  • Equipment,
  • Level of access
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
  • Energy,
  • Social,
  • Economical / Financial
  • Energy
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P017: Capacities
B2P017: Capacities
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P019: Available tools
B2P019: Available tools
  • Energy modelling,
  • Social models,
  • Business and financial models
B2P019: Available tools
B2P020: External accessibility
B2P020: External accessibility
C1P001: Unlocking Factors
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
C1P002: Driving Factors
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)Earthquakes due to gas extraction
C1P003: Administrative barriers
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)Delay in the Environmental Dialogue processing in the municipality
C1P004: Policy barriers
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P005: Non-effective regulations3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P006: Environmental barriers- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 - Water Scarcity: 1
C1P007: Technical barriers
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P007: Deficient planning2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
C1P008: Inertia2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P008: Rebound effect2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
C1P010: Financial barriers
C1P010: Hidden costs2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
C1P011: Market barriers
C1P011: Split incentives5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P011: Energy price distortion4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
C1P012: Stakeholders involved
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • Planning/leading
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: Research & Innovation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Financial/Funding
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Business process management
  • Planning/leading
C1P012: Urban Services providers
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Real Estate developers
  • Construction/implementation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Design/Construction companies
  • Construction/implementation
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
  • None
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation
C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Other
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: Other (if any)
Summary

Authors (framework concept)

Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

Contributors (to the content)

Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

Implemented by

Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)