Search
Close this search box.
Search
Map View
Table View
Projects
Filters:
Clear Filters Export All Entries (CSV)
NameProjectTypeCompare
Tartu, Estonia V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, the Netherlands (District of Kanaleneiland) V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Portugal V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Uncompare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Uncompare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Uncompare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleGroningen, PED North
Lund, Brunnshög district
«×»
Uden, Loopkantstraat
«×»
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio
«×»
Tartu, City centre area
«×»
City of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block
«×»
Freiburg, Waldsee
«×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabGroningen, PED NorthLund, Brunnshög districtUden, LoopkantstraatBorlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential PortfolioTartu, City centre areaCity of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva blockFreiburg, Waldsee
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynoyesnononoyesyes
PED relevant case studynonoyesyesyesnono
PED Lab.yesnononoyesnono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesyesyesyesnoyes
Annual energy surplusyesyesyesyesnonono
Energy communityyesyesnoyesnonoyes
Circularityyesyesnonoyesnono
Air quality and urban comfortnoyesnonononono
Electrificationnoyesyesyesyesnoyes
Net-zero energy costnonononononono
Net-zero emissionyesyesnonoyesnoyes
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nonononononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynononoyesyesyesno
Othernoyesnonononono
Other (A1P004)Holistic approach on city planning; Minimise car traffic - walkability; Local service; Climate neutral buildings 2030;
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabImplementation PhaseIn operationIn operationPlanning PhaseImplementation PhaseIn operationPlanning Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date12/18201506/1702/1606/1811/21
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date12/23204005/2307/2203/2211/24
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards
  • General statistical datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
A1P009: OtherGIS open dataset is under construction
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
  • TNO, Hanze, RUG,
  • Ped noord book
  • Inger Andresen, Tonje Healey Trulsrud, Luca Finocchiaro, Alessandro Nocente, Meril Tamm, Joana Ortiz, Jaume Salom, Abel Magyari, Linda Hoes-van Oeffelen, Wouter Borsboom, Wim Kornaat, Niki Gaitani, Design and performance predictions of plus energy neighbourhoods – Case studies of demonstration projects in four different European climates, Energy and Buildings, Volume 274, 2022, 112447, ISSN 0378-7788, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112447. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778822006181),
  • Deliverable, Report: Integrated Energy Design for Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods (syn.ikia),
  • Deliverable, Report: DEMONSTRATION CASE OF SUSTAINABLE PLUS ENERGY NEIGHBOURHOODS IN MARINE CLIMATE (syn.ikia),
  • https://www.synikia.eu/no/bibliotek/
    • M. Hukkalainen, F. Zarrin, K. Klobut, O. Lindholm, M. Ranta, P. Hajduk, T. Vainio-Kaila, E. Wanne, J. Tartia, H. Horn, K. Kontu, J. Juhmen, S. Santala, R. Turtiainen, J. Töyräs, T. Koljonen. (2020). Deliverable D3.1 Detailed plan of the Espoo smart city lighthouse demonstrations. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2020-09/SPARCS_D3.1_Detailed_plan_Espoo.pdf,
    • Hukkalainen, Zarrin Fatima, Krzysztof Klobut, Kalevi Piira, Mikaela Ranta, Petr Hajduk, Tiina Vainio-Kaila , Elina Wanne, Jani Tartia, Angela Bartel, Joni Mäkinen, Mia Kaurila, Kaisa Kontu, Jaano Juhmen, Merja Ryöppy, Reetta Turtiainen, Joona Töyräs, Timo Koljonen (2021) Deliverable 3.2 Midterm report on the implemented demonstrations of solutions for energy positive blocks in Espoo. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2022-02/SPARCS_D3.2.pdf,
    • www.lippulaiva.fi
    • Data from the local energy provider available (restricted usage for some data points because of data security reasons,
    • renewable energy potential,
    • own calculations based on publicly available data,
    • Some data can be found in https://geoportal.freiburg.de/freigis/
    A1P011: Geographic coordinates
    X Coordinate (longitude):6.53512113.2324694007695995.619115.39449526.72273724.65437.885857135842917
    Y Coordinate (latitude):53.23484655.7198979220719351.660660.48660958.38071360.149147.986535207080045
    A1P012: Country
    A1P012: CountryNetherlandsSwedenNetherlandsSwedenEstoniaFinlandGermany
    A1P013: City
    A1P013: CityGroningenLundUdenBorlängeTartuEspooFreiburg im Breisgau
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CfaDfbCfbDsbDfbDfbCfb
    A1P015: District boundary
    A1P015: District boundaryFunctionalGeographicGeographicGeographicFunctionalGeographicVirtual
    Other
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:MixedPublicPrivateMixedPrivatePrivateMixed
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple Owners
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED72001101892941
    A1P019: Conditioned space
    A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]1.0115000002360370035217112000284070
    A1P020: Total ground area
    A1P020: Total ground area [m²]17.1321500000386099457931441650004920000
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0110010
    A1P022: Financial schemes
    A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estateyesyesyesnoyesyesno
    A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]9999999978044406500000
    A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
    A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Otheryesnononononono
    A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnoyesnonoyesnono
    A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]10000004000000
    A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingyesyesnonoyesnono
    A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]300000008000000
    A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnoyesnonononono
    A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]30000000
    A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingyesyesnonononoyes
    A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]180000000
    A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononono
    A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUyesyesnononoyesyes
    A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]2000000308875
    A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonononononoyes
    A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonononononono
    A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononono
    A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022: Other
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Other
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
    • Positive externalities
    • Job creation,
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local businesses
    A1P023: OtherWorld class sustainable living and research environments
    A1P024: More comments:
    A1P024: More comments:The project is a follow-up from the “Social Beautiful” concept which was developed in collaboration between Labyrint (Support in sheltered housing), Area (housing company), the municipality of Uden, and Hendriks Coppelmans (developer). The concept aims to provide an answer to changes in various policy areas and the changing demands of society. The Social Beautiful concept consists of the following elements: 1. Living, working, and community services are brought together in one location. A multifunctional residential and service centre is being realized at the location. 2. Housing is shaped by the realization of financially accessible homes suitable for the target group. The housing design is tailored to the target group. it may also include sheltered / protected living. 3. Work takes place at the location or from the same location. The work has a social function within the neighbourhood. Wage-related work must contribute to providing structure in the daily activities of the residents. 4. Neighbourhood management is organized from the location in the surrounding neighbourhood. A service package is provided from the residential and service centre that contributes to the ability of neighbourhood residents to live independently for longer, to strengthen the social network, and to improve the quality of life and safety in the neighbourhood. 5. The houses are suitable for use at all times for regular rental. Communal facilities must be realized within the contours of a regular apartment. The objective is to offer a suitable living and working situation to a group of vulnerable citizens. In this way they become a fully-fledged part of society. They not only make use of the facilities themselves, but also give substance to the level of facilities in the municipality. Due to the integrated approach, they experience a greater sense of well-being and security.The Espoonlahti district is located on the south-western coast of Espoo. With 56,000 inhabitants, it is the second largest of the Espoo city centres. The number of inhabitants is estimated to grow to 70,000 within the next 10 years. Espoonlahti will be a future transit hub of the south-western Espoo, along the metro line, and the increasing stream of passengers provides a huge potential for retail, business and residential developments. E-mobility solutions and last-mile services have strong potential in the area when subway extension is finished and running. The extensive (re)development of the Lippulaiva blocks make a benchmark catering to the everyday needs of residents. The completely new shopping centre is a state-of-the-art cross point with 20,000 daily customers and 10,000 daily commuters (3.5 million/year). The new underground metro line and station, and feeder line bus terminal, are fully integrated. Residential housing of approximately 550 new apartments will be built on top. Lippulaiva is a large traffic hub, directly connected to public transport and right next to the Länsiväylä highway and extensive cycle paths. Lippulaiva offers diverse, mixed-use services, such as a shopping mall, public services, a day care centre, residential apartment buildings, and underground parking facilities. Lippulaiva received the LEED Gold environmental certificate and Smart Building Gold certificate. • Flagship of sustainability • Cooling and heating demand from geothermal energy system (on-site) with energy storage system, 4 MW • PV panels: roof and façade, 630 kWp • Smart control strategies for electricity and thermal energy, smart microgrid-system and battery storage • Charging capacity for 134 EVs
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]780444025
    Contact person for general enquiries
    A1P026: NameJasper Tonen, Elisabeth KoopsMarkus PaulssonTonje Healey TrulsrudJingchun ShenJaanus TammElina EkelundDr. Annette Steingrube
    A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of GroningenCity of LundNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)Högskolan DalarnaTartu City GovernmentCitycon OyjFraunhofer Institute for solar energy systems
    A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public BodiesSME / IndustryResearch Center / University
    A1P028: Other
    A1P029: EmailJasper.tonen@groningen.nlmarkus.paulsson@lund.setonje.h.trulsrud@ntnu.nojih@du.seJaanus.tamm@tartu.eeElina.ekelund@citycon.comAnnette.Steingrube@ise.fraunhofer.de
    Contact person for other special topics
    A1P030: NameEva DalmanXingxing ZhangKaspar AlevElina Ekelund
    A1P031: Emaileva.dalman@lund.sexza@du.seKaspar.alev@tartu.eeElina.ekelund@citycon.com
    Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
    A2P001: Fields of application
    A2P001: Fields of application
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
    • Waste management
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
    • Digital technologies,
    • Water use,
    • Waste management,
    • Construction materials,
    • Other
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • Waste management,
    • Indoor air quality,
    • Construction materials
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Construction materials
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
    • Digital technologies,
    • Indoor air quality
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Digital technologies
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Waste management
    A2P001: OtherWalkability and biking
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streamsLundaMaTs methodology for traffic and city planning. LundaEko - Lund's programme for ecological sustainability. Municipally owned land is sold to property developers on environmental conditions.Energy efficiency: Energy efficient envelope, with good insulation, triple glazing windows and airtight envelope. (EPC = 0) Energy Flexibility: MCP controls for the heat pump in the apartments. Energy production: PV panels on the roof, Ground source heat pumps Waste management: construction waste was kept to a minimum and sorted and collected separately as much as possible. Indoor air quality: Exhaust ventilation and opening of windows Construction materials: low carbon emission building materialsLoad calculation and system optimisation: City Energy Analyst Identification of stranded assets for asset owners and investors to understand the carbon risks: CRREMEnergy efficiency: - buildings retrofitting - combined public and private financing - low temperature central heating - LED lighting Energy production: - installation of photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Digital technologies: - smart-meters smart home system. Smart city information platform E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; - e-bike/bikesharing services implementation. Urban comfort and air quality - Control units for air pollutants concentration (PM2.5, PM10, NO2) - Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan - SECAP)Energy efficiency: - eliminating waste energy utilizing smart energy system - utilizing excess heat from grocery stores Energy flexibility: - A battery energy storage system (1,5 MW/1,5MWh); Active participation in Nordpool electricity market (FCR-N) Energy production: - heating and cooling from geothermal heat pump system; 171 energy wells (over 51 km); heat capacity 4 MW - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Estimation of annual production is about 540 MWh (630 kWp) E-mobility - Installation of charging stations for electric vehicles (for 134 EVs) - e-bike services (warm storage room, charging cabinets for e-bikes) Digital technologies: - Building Analytics system by Schneider ElectricEnergy system modeling
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoNoYesNoNoYesYes
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesNoYesYesYesYes
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesNoNoNoNoYes
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationMobility, till now, is not included in the energy model.Today electrically charged vehicles are included in the energy balance. In the future also other fuels should be included.not includedMobility is not included in the energy model.All energy demands are included in energy balance, either fuel demands or electrical demand of transport sector; Projection is made of future share of electric mobilty, rest is covered with synthetic fuels to achieve climate neutrality
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]2.3250.1480.67779.15.5135.715
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.33300.1090.036565.831.76
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]0
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]0
    A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P011: PVnoyesyesnoyesyesno
    A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.0580.54
    A2P011: Windnoyesnonononono
    A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Hydrononononononono
    A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Biomass_elnonononononono
    A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: PVT_elnononoyesnonono
    A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.01818
    A2P011: Othernonononononono
    A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P012: Geothermalyesnoyesnonoyesno
    A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]5
    A2P012: Solar Thermalyesnononoyesnono
    A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.5
    A2P012: Biomass_heatyesnononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.1
    A2P012: Waste heat+HPyesyesnonononono
    A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]200
    A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: PVT_thyesnonoyesnonono
    A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.0825
    A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Othernonononononono
    A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesGeothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centers*Annual energy use below is presentedin primary energy consumption53 MW PV potential in all three quarters; no other internal renewable energy potentials known
    A2P014: Annual energy use
    A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]0.1940.31811.3132.5
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]0.03680.20555.76
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]000
    A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P017: Gasnonononononono
    A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
    A2P017: Coalnonononononono
    A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
    A2P017: Oilnonononononono
    A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
    A2P017: Othernononoyesnonono
    A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
    A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P018: PVnoyesnonononono
    A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Windnoyesnonononono
    A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Hydronoyesnonononono
    A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_elnoyesnonononono
    A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
    A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
    A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Othernononoyesnoyesno
    A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.1875.26
    A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
    A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
    A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_heatnonononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
    A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
    A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Othernononoyesnonono
    A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary0000.5383957219251301.05323193916350
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]-0.000436.939800
    A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
    A2P022: Safety & SecurityPersonal Safetynone
    A2P022: HealthHealthy communitythermal comfort diagram
    A2P022: Educationnone
    A2P022: MobilityMaximum 1/3 transport with carSustainable mobilitynoneyes
    A2P022: EnergyLocal energy production 150% of energy needNOn-renewable primary energy balance, renewable energy ratio, grid purchase factor, load cover factor/self-generation, supply cover factor/self-consumption, net energy/net power, peak delivered/peak expoted, total greenhouse gas emissionnormalized CO2/GHG & Energy intensityOn-site energy ratioyes
    A2P022: Water
    A2P022: Economic developmentcapital costs, operational cots, overall economic performance (5 KPIs)cost of excess emissions
    A2P022: Housing and Community50% rental apartments and 50% owner apartmentsdemographic composition, diverse community, social cohesionyes
    A2P022: Waste
    A2P022: OtherSmartness and flecibility, Indoor Environmental Quality, Social performance - Equity (affordable housing, access to servicees and amenitioes, afforability of energy, living conditions, sustinable mobility, universal design)
    A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
    A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
    A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsyesyesnoyesnonoyes
    A2P023: Wind Turbinesnoyesnonononono
    A2P023: Geothermal energy systemyesyesyesyesnoyesyes
    A2P023: Waste heat recoveryyesyesnoyesnoyesyes
    A2P023: Waste to energyyesnononononoyes
    A2P023: Polygenerationnoyesnonononono
    A2P023: Co-generationnonononononoyes
    A2P023: Heat Pumpyesyesyesyesnonoyes
    A2P023: Hydrogennoyesnonononoyes
    A2P023: Hydropower plantnonononononoyes
    A2P023: Biomassnonononoyesnoyes
    A2P023: Biogasnonononoyesnoyes
    A2P023: Other
    A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
    A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)yesyesnoyesyesyesyes
    A2P024: Energy management systemyesyesyesnoyesyesyes
    A2P024: Demand-side managementyesyesyesnononoyes
    A2P024: Smart electricity gridnoyesnononoyesyes
    A2P024: Thermal Storageyesyesnoyesnoyesyes
    A2P024: Electric Storageyesyesnononoyesyes
    A2P024: District Heating and Coolingyesyesnoyesyesnoyes
    A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsyesyesyesnononoyes
    A2P024: P2P – buildingsnonononononoyes
    A2P024: Other
    A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
    A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnononoyesyesnoyes
    A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsyesnononononoyes
    A2P025: High-performance new buildingsyesyesyesnonoyesno
    A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)yesyesnonoyesyesno
    A2P025: Urban data platformsyesyesnonoyesnoyes
    A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnonononoyesnono
    A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)noyesyesyesnoyesno
    A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononononono
    A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnoyesnonononono
    A2P025: Smart surveillancenonononoyesnono
    A2P025: Other
    A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
    A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nonononoyesnoyes
    A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)noyesnonoyesyesyes
    A2P026: e-Mobilityyesyesnonoyesyesyes
    A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnoyesnonononoyes
    A2P026: Car-free areanoyesnonononono
    A2P026: OtherLocal transportation hub with direct connection to metro & bus terminal; parking spaces for 1,400 bicycles and for 1,300 cars Promoting e-Mobility: 134 charging stations, A technical reservation for expanding EV charging system 1400 bicycle racks and charging cabinets for 10 e-bicycle batteries
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notesWalkability
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesYesYesNoYesYesNo
    A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance CertificateMiljöbyggnad silver/guldEPC = 0, energy neutral buildingEnergy Performance Certificate => Energy efficiency class B (2018 version)
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoNoYesNo
    A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesLEED (Core & Shell, v4) GOLD certification, Smart Building certification (GOLD)
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • New development strategies,
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.)
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • New development strategies,
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Smart cities strategies
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyCity strategy: Net climate neutrality 2030The study aligns closely with the decarbonisation and energy reduction pathways of residential multi family buildings with 1.5°C global warming target in Sweden. This study will also contribute to the achievement of the carbon neturality of whole Borlänge city by 2030.Relevant city strategies behind PED development in Espoo include the following: - The Espoo Story: Sustainability is heavily included within the values and goals of the current Espoo city strategy, also known as the Espoo Story, running from 2021 to 2025. For example, the strategy names being a responsible pioneer as one of the main values of the city and has chosen achieving carbon neutrality by 2030 as one of the main goals of the current council term. In addition to the Espoo story, four cross-administrative development programmes act as cooperation platforms that allow the city, together with its partners, to develop innovative solutions through experiments and pilot projects in line with the Espoo Story. The Sustainable Espoo development programme is one of the four programmes, thus putting sustainability on the forefront in city development work. - EU Mission: 100 climate-neutral and smart cities by 2030: Cities selected for the Mission commit to achieving carbon-neutrality in 2030. A key tool in the Mission is the Climate City Contract. Each selected city will prepare and implement its contracts in collaboration with local businesses as well as other stakeholders and residents. - Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy: Espoo is committed to the Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy, under which the signatories commit to supporting the European Union’s 40% greenhouse gas emission reduction goal by 2030. The Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP) is a key instrument for implementing the agreement. The Action Plan outlines the key measures the city will take to achieve its carbon neutrality goal. The plan also includes a mapping of climate change risks and vulnerabilities, adaptation measures, emission calculations, emission reduction scenarios and impact estimations of measures. The SECAP of the City of Espoo is available here (only available in Finnish). - UN Sustainable development Goals: The city of Espoo has committed to becoming a forerunner and achieving the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) by 2025. The goal is to make Espoo financially, ecologically, socially, and culturally sustainable. - The Circular Cities Declaration: At the end of 2020, Espoo signed the Europe-wide circular economy commitment Circular Cities Declaration. The ten goals of the declaration promote the implementation of the city’s circular economy. - Espoo Clean Heat: Fortum and the City of Espoo are committed to producing carbon-neutral district heating in the network operating in the areas of Espoo, Kauniainen and Kirkkonummi during the 2020s. The district heating network provides heating to some 250,000 end-users in homes and offices. Coal will be completely abandoned in the production of district heating by 2025. The main targets related to PED development included in the noted city strategies are the following: - Espoo will achieve carbon neutrality by 2030. To be precise, this carbon neutrality goal is defined as an 80% emission reduction from the 1990 level by the year 2030. The remaining 20% share can be absorbed in carbon sinks or compensated by other means. - District heating in Espoo will be carbon-neutral by 2029, and coal-based production will be phased out from district heating by 2025. - Espoo aims to end the use of fossil fuels in the heating of city-owned buildings by 2025. - Quantitative goals within the Espoo SECAP report: - Espoo aims to reduce total energy consumption within the municipal sector by 7.5% by the end of 2025 in comparison to the 2015 level. The social housing company Espoon Asunnot OY aims to meet the same target. - Espoo aims to cover 10% of the energy consumption of new buildings via on-site production. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of cycling to 15% by 2024. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of public transport by 1.1% yearly. - Espoo aims to reduce the emissions of bus transport by 90% by the end of 2025, when compared to 2010 levels.Climate neutrality by 2035
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
    • Electrification of Cooking Methods,
    • Biogas
    • Biogas,
    • Hydrogen
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
    • Biogas,
    • Hydrogen
    A3P003: OtherNo gas grid in Brunnshög
    A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
    A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesLocal waste heat is utlized to a very large extent. More local electricity production is needed. Need to minimise the use of private cars.In our project, we carried out a comprehensive exploration of strategies to achieve positive energy districts in a Swedish residential portfolio. The focus on urban energy transitions necessitates a holistic approach that integrates building retrofit, solar technology exploration, and heating supply optimisation. Exploration of Local Solar Sources: The analysis reveals varying solar irradiance resources throughout the year, emphasizing the importance of strategic placement. Integration of combined photovoltaic and thermal panels into building envelopes demonstrates the potential to cover a significant portion of the energy demand even in Sweden. Heating Supply Optimisation with Solar Technologies: Despite the surplus energy production from on-site solar technology, challenges arise due to temporal energy asymmetry. The introduction of heat pumps emerges as a feasible solution to balance energy gaps, utilising both rejected and free heat. Optimisation scenarios, utilising a combination of geothermal heat pumps, water source heat pumps, and PVT, showcase remarkable reductions in emissions and primary energy consumption. Urban Form and Energy Infrastructure Design: We realised the importance of returning to urban form and energy infrastructure design to optimise future residential portfolio potential. Building layout design, influenced by zoning regulations and innovative typologies, plays a crucial role in achieving district level energy efficiency. Future challenges, including demographic shifts, e-mobility, and climate change, necessitate a more holistic approach to energy infrastructure design, addressing not only heating and electricity demands but also cooling requirements.- Citycon (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) aims to be carbon neutral in its energy use by 2030 - Lippulaiva is a unique urban centre with state-of-the-art energy concept. The centre has a smart managing system, which allows for example the temporary reduction of power used in air conditioning and charging stations when energy consumption is at its peak. In addition, a backup generator and a large electric battery will balance the operation of the electricity network. - Lippulaiva is also an important mobility hub for the people of Espoo. Espoonlahti metro station is located under the centre, and the West Metro started to operate to Espoonlahti in December 2022. Lippulaiva also has a bus terminal, which serves the metro’s feeder traffic in the Espoonlahti major district.Freiburg has ambitious goals and wants to achieve climate neutrality until 2035, the PED concept could help to develop suitable strategies on district level
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviourIn Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed.Need to minimise the use of private cars. Need to provide efficient methods for sorce separated waste collection.While our investigation primarily centres on technical optimisation within Positive Energy District (PED) development, it is essential to acknowledge the broader scope encompassing social and governance dimensions. Specifically, understanding stakeholders' willingness to embrace technical recommendations upon project completion is important. Several potential influencing factors merit exploration, including economic considerations, technical optimisation-associated embodied carbon balance, the general public's technical perceptions, and operational feasibility. Evaluating these aspects holistically not only enhances the efficacy of PED initiatives but also fosters greater acceptance and participation within the communities they serve.For Citycon, it was important to engage local people within the Lippulaiva project. During the construction period as well as after opening of the shopping center, citizens have been engaged in multiple ways, such as informing local citizens of the progress of construction, engaging young people in the design processes of the shopping centre and long-term commitment of youngsters with Lippulaiva Buddy class initiative. Users’ engagement activities are conducted in close co-operation with SPARCS partners.Energy efficiency by renovation measures for buildings and measures for saving electricity; electrification by installation of heat pumps and photovoltaics and switching to electric cars, additional measures not directly related to PED like sustainable diet and sharing economy
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    • Innovative business models,
    • Blockchain
    • PPP models,
    • Other
    • Open data business models,
    • Life Cycle Cost,
    • Circular economy models,
    • Local trading
    • Innovative business models,
    • PPP models,
    • Life Cycle Cost,
    • Existing incentives
    • Innovative business models
    • Demand management Living Lab,
    • Local trading,
    • Existing incentives
    A3P006: OtherAttractivenes
    A3P007: Social models
    A3P007: Social models
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Citizen Social Research,
    • Prevention of energy poverty,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Quality of Life,
    • Strategies towards social mix
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Social incentives,
    • Quality of Life
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Social incentives,
    • Affordability,
    • Digital Inclusion
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Citizen Social Research,
    • Policy Forums,
    • Social incentives,
    • Quality of Life,
    • Prevention of energy poverty,
    • Digital Inclusion,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
    • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
    • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
    A3P007: Other
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • District Energy plans,
    • City Vision 2050,
    • SECAP Updates
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
    • City Vision 2050,
    • SECAP Updates
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
    • District Energy plans,
    • Building / district Certification
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • City Vision 2050,
    • SECAP Updates
    • Building / district Certification
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
    • District Energy plans
    A3P008: Other
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    • Energy Neutral
    • Net zero carbon footprint,
    • Greening strategies,
    • Sustainable Urban drainage systems (SUDS),
    • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
    • Low Emission Zone,
    • Net zero carbon footprint,
    • Life Cycle approach,
    • Sustainable Urban drainage systems (SUDS)
    • Net zero carbon footprint,
    • Carbon-free,
    • Pollutants Reduction,
    • Greening strategies,
    • Sustainable Urban drainage systems (SUDS),
    • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
    • Other
    A3P009: OtherCarbon free in terms of energy
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsAt national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen:  Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation.  Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries.  The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals.  Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricityThe municipality cannot demand a specific energy solution to private property owners. It has to be voluntary and market based solutions.- Energy efficiency regulations (Directive 2006/32/EC and 2009/72/EC) - EU directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings => all new buildings should be “nearly zero-energy buildings” (nZEB) from 2021
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionVision: The city as a power plant. The ultimate goal is that more energy is produced within the distric boundaries than is being used (heating, electricity & mobility). Energy efficient buildings, efficient mobility, reuse of residual heat and solar electricity are the main methods.The demonstration projects is a new residential development, which consists of an apartment complex which includes 39 apartments spread over 3 floors. It is a sustainble plus energy neighbouhood, and has reached a plus energy balance on its first year in operation. It has MPC controls on the individual heat pumps to improve the energy flexibility of the apartments. It includes the "social beatiful" concepts with a strong emphasis on the social sustainability of the project.The Rymdgatan's Residential Portfolio in Sweden presents a compelling case study for its classification as a PED-related research, given its alignment with sustainable behaviours and overarching PED development principles as follows: Inclusivity and Social Equity: The residential portfolio situated in Rymdgatan caters primarily to a low-income community. By focusing on this demographic, the project addresses critical aspects of social equity within sustainable urban development. Ensuring access to energy-efficient housing and amenities for economically disadvantaged populations not only fosters social cohesion but also mitigates energy poverty, a pressing concern in many urban contexts. Multifamily Residential Building: The inclusion of multifamily residential buildings within the portfolio underscores a commitment to density and efficient land use, both essential components of sustainable urban design. Such developments promote resource optimisation by consolidating housing units, thereby reducing per capita energy consumption and infrastructure demands. Moreover, multifamily dwellings often facilitate community engagement and shared resource management, fostering a culture of sustainability among residents. Low Carbon Retrofitting and Transition: The overarching initiative to transition the entire Jakobsgårdarna district. The included Rymdgatan portfolio, towards low carbon retrofitting, represents a significant example of decarbonization and climate resilience. By integrating energy-efficient technologies and renewable energy solutions into existing infrastructure, the project not only reduces carbon emissions but also serves as a blueprint for revitalising old urban environments sustainably. This holistic approach to retrofitting demonstrates a systemic commitment to environmental stewardship and long-term sustainability. Climate Adaptation and Renewable Energy Integration: Despite Sweden's climatic challenges, including lower solar resources during winter months, the Rymdgatan project leverages its geographical context to optimize renewable energy utilization. Sweden's greater solar resource availability during summer and geothermal potentials complement the design's emphasis on seasonal energy planning, where surplus energy generated during peak periods can be stored or redistributed efficiently. By embracing climate-responsive design strategies, the project demonstrates resilience in the face of climate variability while harnessing renewable energy potential effectively.Lippulaiva is a project with high level goal in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production.Assessment methods for this ped (and for germany) is defined in this project at the moment and will be tested at that case study
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentThe aim is to build a sustainable city with minimal climate impact and maximum quality of life. PED is an important step to acheive the aims of a very ambitious city development.The need for social housing and the ambition to create a great living environment with a high-performance apartment complex, supplied with renewable energy. It results in lower energy bills for the tenants and high-quality homes.Borlänge city has committed to become the carbon-neutral city by 2030.- Citycon’s (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) target is to be carbon neutral by 2030 - Increasing sustainability requirements from the financing, tenants, cities, other stakeholdersCity is interested in transforming the quarter, as many buildings are old, have private owner structures and have decentralised heating systems. As the city wants to become climate neutral by 2035 action is needed now. In the research project PED urban the idea is to focus on the future energy system of the quarter and use it as a case study to develop a common assessment method for PEDs in alignment with european efforts in that regard
    B1P003: Environment of the case study area
    B2P003: Environment of the case study areaUrban areaSuburban areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban areaSuburban area
    B1P004: Type of district
    B2P004: Type of district
    • New construction
    • New construction
    • Renovation
    • Renovation
    • New construction
    • Renovation
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    • New Development
    • New Development
    • Re-use / Transformation Area,
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Re-use / Transformation Area,
    • New Development
    • Retrofitting Area
    B1P006: Year of construction
    B1P006: Year of construction19902022
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential010045005898
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential180001005898
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential20006
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential220006
    B1P011: Population density before intervention
    B1P011: Population density before intervention0000000
    B1P012: Population density after intervention
    B1P012: Population density after intervention00.02666666666666700.010658622423328000.0011987804878049
    B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
    B1P013: Residentialnononoyesyesnoyes
    B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]4360
    B1P013: Officenoyesnonononoyes
    B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]60000
    B1P013: Industry and Utilitynonononononoyes
    B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Commercialnonononoyesyesyes
    B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Institutionalnonononononoyes
    B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Natural areasnoyesnonoyesyesyes
    B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]2000000
    B1P013: Recreationalnonononoyesnoyes
    B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Dismissed areasnonononononono
    B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Othernoyesnoyesnonono
    B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]Outdoor parking: 100000706
    B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
    B1P014: Residentialnoyesyesyesyesyesyes
    B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]60000023944360
    B1P014: Officenoyesnonononoyes
    B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]650000
    B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonononononoyes
    B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Commercialnonononoyesyesyes
    B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Institutionalnoyesnonononoyes
    B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]50000
    B1P014: Natural areasnonononoyesnoyes
    B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Recreationalnoyesnonoyesnoyes
    B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]400000
    B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononononono
    B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Othernononoyesnonono
    B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]706
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionGroningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city.
    B2P002: Installation life time
    B2P002: Installation life timeThe MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact.
    B2P003: Scale of action
    B2P003: ScaleDistrictDistrict
    B2P004: Operator of the installation
    B2P004: Operator of the installationThe Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties.
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materialsGroningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materials
    B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
    B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?NoNo
    B2P006: Other
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    • Civic
    • Strategic
    B2P007: Other
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipalityMunicipality
    B2P008: Other
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    • Academia,
    • Private,
    • Industrial,
    • Other
    • Academia,
    • Private,
    • Industrial,
    • Citizens, public, NGO
    B2P009: Otherresearch companies, monitoring company, ict company
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    • Buildings,
    • Demand-side management,
    • Energy storage,
    • Energy networks,
    • Waste management,
    • Lighting,
    • E-mobility,
    • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
    • Social interactions,
    • Business models
    • Buildings,
    • Prosumers,
    • Renewable generation,
    • Energy networks,
    • Lighting,
    • E-mobility,
    • Green areas,
    • User interaction/participation,
    • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)
    B2P011: Other
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    • Tools for prototyping and modelling
    • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
    • Pivoting and risk-mitigating measures
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    • Execution plan,
    • Available data,
    • Type of measured data,
    • Equipment,
    • Level of access
    • Available data,
    • Life Cycle Analysis
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    • Energy,
    • Social,
    • Economical / Financial
    • Energy,
    • Sustainability,
    • Social,
    • Economical / Financial
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P017: Capacities
    B2P017: Capacities
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P019: Available tools
    • Energy modelling,
    • Social models,
    • Business and financial models
    • Social models
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P020: External accessibility
    B2P020: External accessibility
    C1P001: Unlocking Factors
    C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
    C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
    C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important
    C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
    C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
    C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important
    C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
    C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important
    C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important
    C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important
    C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
    C1P002: Driving Factors
    C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
    C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important
    C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
    C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)Earthquakes due to gas extraction
    C1P003: Administrative barriers
    C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important
    C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
    C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)Delay in the Environmental Dialogue processing in the municipality
    C1P004: Policy barriers
    C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
    C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
    C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important
    C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
    C1P005: Non-effective regulations3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
    C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
    C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
    C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
    C1P006: Environmental barriers
    C1P006: Environmental barriers?2 - Slightly important
    C1P007: Technical barriers
    C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important
    C1P007: Deficient planning2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important
    C1P007: Lack of well-defined process3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important
    C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
    C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
    C1P008: Inertia2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
    C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
    C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P008: Rebound effect2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
    C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
    C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
    C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
    C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
    C1P010: Financial barriers
    C1P010: Hidden costs2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important
    C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
    C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
    C1P010: Risk and uncertainty3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
    C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
    C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
    C1P011: Market barriers
    C1P011: Split incentives5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
    C1P011: Energy price distortion4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
    C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
    C1P012: Stakeholders involved
    C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading
    C1P012: Research & Innovation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Financial/Funding
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Construction/implementation
    • None
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • None
    C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    • Planning/leading,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    C1P012: Business process management
    • Planning/leading
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • None
    • Planning/leading
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • None
    C1P012: Urban Services providers
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    • Construction/implementation
    • None
    • None
    C1P012: Real Estate developers
    • Construction/implementation
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • None
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    C1P012: Design/Construction companies
    • Construction/implementation
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • None
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Construction/implementation
    C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
    • None
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • None
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    C1P012: Other
    C1P012: Other (if any)
    Summary

    Authors (framework concept)

    Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

    Contributors (to the content)

    Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

    Implemented by

    Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
    Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

    Join the Action

    PED-EU-NET is an open, interdisciplinary and growing network welcoming academics, practitioners and relevant stakeholders to contribute to the activities of the work plan.
    Join Now

    COST

    COST is an EU funding programme that enables researchers to set up their interdisciplinary research networks in Europe and beyond. We provide funds for organising conferences, meetings, training schools, short scientific exchanges or other networking activities in a wide range of scientific topics. By creating open spaces where people and ideas can grow, we unlock the full potential of science.

    PED-EU-NET

    The COST Action Positive Energy Districts European Network (PED-EU-NET) aims to mobilise researchers and other relevant stakeholders across different domains and sectors to drive the deployment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Europe through open sharing of knowledge, exchange of ideas, pooling of resources, experimentation of new methods and co-creation of novel solutions.

    Action Details

    Grant Holder
    Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome

    Start of Action: 10 September 2020
    End of Action: 09 September 2024
    CSO approval date: 24/03/2020

    © 2021-2023 PED-EU-NET COST Action CA19126. All rights reserved.