Filters:
NameProjectTypeCompare
Tartu, Estonia V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, the Netherlands (District of Kanaleneiland) V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Portugal V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Uncompare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Uncompare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Uncompare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Uncompare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleGroningen, PED North
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau
Vantaa, Aviapolis
Salzburg, Gneis district
Freiburg, Waldsee
Uden, Loopkantstraat
City of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabGroningen, PED NorthMaia, Sobreiro Social HousingKladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter StadiumSchönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der DonauVantaa, AviapolisSalzburg, Gneis districtFreiburg, WaldseeUden, LoopkantstraatCity of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynonononoyesyesyesnoyes
PED relevant case studynonoyesyesyesnonoyesno
PED Lab.yesyesnonoyesnononono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesyesyesyesyesyesyesno
Annual energy surplusyesnoyesnonoyesnoyesno
Energy communityyesnoyesyesnoyesyesnono
Circularityyesnononoyesnononono
Air quality and urban comfortnononononoyesnonono
Electrificationnonoyesnononoyesyesno
Net-zero energy costnononoyesnonononono
Net-zero emissionyesnononononoyesnono
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nonononononononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynoyesnoyesnonononoyes
Othernonononononononono
Other (A1P004)
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabImplementation PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhaseImplementation PhasePlanning PhaseCompletedPlanning PhaseIn operationIn operation
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date12/1810/21202201/2301/2011/2106/1706/18
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date12/2310/2412/2701/2411/2405/2303/22
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • General statistical datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • General statistical datasets
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
  • TNO, Hanze, RUG,
  • Ped noord book
      • Data from the local energy provider available (restricted usage for some data points because of data security reasons,
      • renewable energy potential,
      • own calculations based on publicly available data,
      • Some data can be found in https://geoportal.freiburg.de/freigis/
      • Inger Andresen, Tonje Healey Trulsrud, Luca Finocchiaro, Alessandro Nocente, Meril Tamm, Joana Ortiz, Jaume Salom, Abel Magyari, Linda Hoes-van Oeffelen, Wouter Borsboom, Wim Kornaat, Niki Gaitani, Design and performance predictions of plus energy neighbourhoods – Case studies of demonstration projects in four different European climates, Energy and Buildings, Volume 274, 2022, 112447, ISSN 0378-7788, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112447. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778822006181),
      • Deliverable, Report: Integrated Energy Design for Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods (syn.ikia),
      • Deliverable, Report: DEMONSTRATION CASE OF SUSTAINABLE PLUS ENERGY NEIGHBOURHOODS IN MARINE CLIMATE (syn.ikia),
      • https://www.synikia.eu/no/bibliotek/
      • M. Hukkalainen, F. Zarrin, K. Klobut, O. Lindholm, M. Ranta, P. Hajduk, T. Vainio-Kaila, E. Wanne, J. Tartia, H. Horn, K. Kontu, J. Juhmen, S. Santala, R. Turtiainen, J. Töyräs, T. Koljonen. (2020). Deliverable D3.1 Detailed plan of the Espoo smart city lighthouse demonstrations. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2020-09/SPARCS_D3.1_Detailed_plan_Espoo.pdf,
      • Hukkalainen, Zarrin Fatima, Krzysztof Klobut, Kalevi Piira, Mikaela Ranta, Petr Hajduk, Tiina Vainio-Kaila , Elina Wanne, Jani Tartia, Angela Bartel, Joni Mäkinen, Mia Kaurila, Kaisa Kontu, Jaano Juhmen, Merja Ryöppy, Reetta Turtiainen, Joona Töyräs, Timo Koljonen (2021) Deliverable 3.2 Midterm report on the implemented demonstrations of solutions for energy positive blocks in Espoo. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2022-02/SPARCS_D3.2.pdf,
      • www.lippulaiva.fi
      A1P011: Geographic coordinates
      X Coordinate (longitude):6.535121-8.37355714.0929615.396924.95882113.0412167.8858571358429175.619124.6543
      Y Coordinate (latitude):53.23484641.13580450.1371548.275260.30548847.77101947.98653520708004551.660660.1491
      A1P012: Country
      A1P012: CountryNetherlandsPortugalCzech RepublicAustriaFinlandAustriaGermanyNetherlandsFinland
      A1P013: City
      A1P013: CityGroningenMaiaKladnoSchönbühel an der DonauVantaaSalzburgFreiburg im BreisgauUdenEspoo
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CfaCsbCfbDfbDfbDfbCfbCfbDfb
      A1P015: District boundary
      A1P015: District boundaryFunctionalVirtualGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicVirtualGeographicGeographic
      OtherV1* (ca 8 buildings)
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:MixedPublicMixedPrivateMixedMixedMixedPrivatePrivate
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerSingle Owner
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED7228017294119
      A1P019: Conditioned space
      A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]1.014771997622840702360112000
      A1P020: Total ground area
      A1P020: Total ground area [m²]17.1322450388100049200003860165000
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area000000011
      A1P022: Financial schemes
      A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estateyesnoyesyesyesnonoyesyes
      A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]7804440
      A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonoyesnononononono
      A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Otheryesyesnonoyesnononono
      A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonoyesnononononono
      A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingyesyesnoyesnonononono
      A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnoyesnoyesnonononono
      A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingyesnoyesnoyesnoyesnono
      A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononononono
      A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUyesyesyesnoyesyesyesnoyes
      A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]308875
      A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonoyesnononoyesnono
      A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonononononononono
      A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononononono
      A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022: OtherMultiple different funding schemes depending on the development site within the District and Lab.
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      • Boosting local businesses,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      • Job creation,
      • Positive externalities
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local businesses,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      • Positive externalities,
      • Other
      • Job creation,
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local businesses
      A1P023: OtherBoosting social cooperation and social aid
      A1P024: More comments:
      A1P024: More comments:The project is a follow-up from the “Social Beautiful” concept which was developed in collaboration between Labyrint (Support in sheltered housing), Area (housing company), the municipality of Uden, and Hendriks Coppelmans (developer). The concept aims to provide an answer to changes in various policy areas and the changing demands of society. The Social Beautiful concept consists of the following elements: 1. Living, working, and community services are brought together in one location. A multifunctional residential and service centre is being realized at the location. 2. Housing is shaped by the realization of financially accessible homes suitable for the target group. The housing design is tailored to the target group. it may also include sheltered / protected living. 3. Work takes place at the location or from the same location. The work has a social function within the neighbourhood. Wage-related work must contribute to providing structure in the daily activities of the residents. 4. Neighbourhood management is organized from the location in the surrounding neighbourhood. A service package is provided from the residential and service centre that contributes to the ability of neighbourhood residents to live independently for longer, to strengthen the social network, and to improve the quality of life and safety in the neighbourhood. 5. The houses are suitable for use at all times for regular rental. Communal facilities must be realized within the contours of a regular apartment. The objective is to offer a suitable living and working situation to a group of vulnerable citizens. In this way they become a fully-fledged part of society. They not only make use of the facilities themselves, but also give substance to the level of facilities in the municipality. Due to the integrated approach, they experience a greater sense of well-being and security.The Espoonlahti district is located on the south-western coast of Espoo. With 56,000 inhabitants, it is the second largest of the Espoo city centres. The number of inhabitants is estimated to grow to 70,000 within the next 10 years. Espoonlahti will be a future transit hub of the south-western Espoo, along the metro line, and the increasing stream of passengers provides a huge potential for retail, business and residential developments. E-mobility solutions and last-mile services have strong potential in the area when subway extension is finished and running. The extensive (re)development of the Lippulaiva blocks make a benchmark catering to the everyday needs of residents. The completely new shopping centre is a state-of-the-art cross point with 20,000 daily customers and 10,000 daily commuters (3.5 million/year). The new underground metro line and station, and feeder line bus terminal, are fully integrated. Residential housing of approximately 550 new apartments will be built on top. Lippulaiva is a large traffic hub, directly connected to public transport and right next to the Länsiväylä highway and extensive cycle paths. Lippulaiva offers diverse, mixed-use services, such as a shopping mall, public services, a day care centre, residential apartment buildings, and underground parking facilities. Lippulaiva received the LEED Gold environmental certificate and Smart Building Gold certificate. • Flagship of sustainability • Cooling and heating demand from geothermal energy system (on-site) with energy storage system, 4 MW • PV panels: roof and façade, 630 kWp • Smart control strategies for electricity and thermal energy, smart microgrid-system and battery storage • Charging capacity for 134 EVs
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]7804440
      Contact person for general enquiries
      A1P026: NameJasper Tonen, Elisabeth KoopsAdelina RodriguesDavid ŠkorňaGhazal EtminanEira LinkoAbel MagyariDr. Annette SteingrubeTonje Healey TrulsrudElina Ekelund
      A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of GroningenMaia Municipality (CM Maia) – Energy and Mobility divisionMěsto KladnoGhazal.Etminan@ait.ac.atCity of VantaaABUDFraunhofer Institute for solar energy systemsNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)Citycon Oyj
      A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversitySME / Industry
      A1P028: Other
      A1P029: EmailJasper.tonen@groningen.nldscm.adelina@cm-maia.ptdavid.skorna@mestokladno.czGhazal.Etminan@ait.ac.ateira.linko@vantaa.fimagyari.abel@abud.huAnnette.Steingrube@ise.fraunhofer.detonje.h.trulsrud@ntnu.noElina.ekelund@citycon.com
      Contact person for other special topics
      A1P030: NameCarolina Gonçalves (AdEPorto)Michal KuzmičStrassl IngeborgElina Ekelund
      A1P031: Emailcarolinagoncalves@adeporto.eumichal.kuzmic@cvut.czinge.strassl@salzburg.gv.atElina.ekelund@citycon.com
      Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
      A2P001: Fields of application
      A2P001: Fields of application
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
      • Waste management
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
      • Digital technologies
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies,
      • Indoor air quality
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
      • Digital technologies,
      • Construction materials,
      • Other
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Waste management
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • Waste management,
      • Indoor air quality,
      • Construction materials
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies
      A2P001: Other
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streamsEnergy production: - installation of photovoltaic systems for renewable on-site energy production; - installation of a BIPV demonstrator for the City Hall building. Energy flexibility: - implementation of an energy community through an active citizens involvement process. Digital technologies: - smart-meters installation in some dwellings in order to monitor consumption and suggest more sustainable energy behaviours. [PCP] Through https://balcaodigital.e-redes.pt/consumptions/history “Espaço Municipal” (https://www.espacomunicipal.pt/pt/) might access history of consumption up to midnight of the previous day. E-mobility: - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban comfort and air quality: - Monitoring units for air pollutants concentration (PM2.5, PM10, NO2) [PCP] Currently we are monitoring CO, O3, NO2, SO2, noise, PM2.5 and PM10 at a point 267 m east from the four buildings southeast of Sobreiro area:Trnsys, PV modelling tools, CADEnergy modelingPilot collaboration with landowners. Carbon footprint assessment and planning guidelines in zoning planning. Green infrastructure requirements. Examples of considered energy solutions: waste heat recovery and utilization, geothermal, air-water heat pumps, district heating return water, photovoltaics, A-class energy efficiency, smart control and monitoring, energy storages, E-mobility above national requirements, cooling- Dynamic district, and building scale energy modelling - Microclimate modelling - Klimaaktiv certification system - Energy community - Flexibility with shared heating and electricity systemsEnergy system modelingEnergy efficiency: Energy efficient envelope, with good insulation, triple glazing windows and airtight envelope. (EPC = 0) Energy Flexibility: MCP controls for the heat pump in the apartments. Energy production: PV panels on the roof, Ground source heat pumps Waste management: construction waste was kept to a minimum and sorted and collected separately as much as possible. Indoor air quality: Exhaust ventilation and opening of windows Construction materials: low carbon emission building materialsEnergy efficiency: - eliminating waste energy utilizing smart energy system - utilizing excess heat from grocery stores Energy flexibility: - A battery energy storage system (1,5 MW/1,5MWh); Active participation in Nordpool electricity market (FCR-N) Energy production: - heating and cooling from geothermal heat pump system; 171 energy wells (over 51 km); heat capacity 4 MW - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Estimation of annual production is about 540 MWh (630 kWp) E-mobility - Installation of charging stations for electric vehicles (for 134 EVs) - e-bike services (warm storage room, charging cabinets for e-bikes) Digital technologies: - Building Analytics system by Schneider Electric
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoNoNoNoNoYesYesYesYes
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesYesYesNoYesNoYes
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNoNoNoYesNoNo
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationMobility, till now, is not included in the energy model.Not yet included.The calculation of the energy balance will be further developed and specified under the Neutralpath-project. Mobility related emissions are taken into account in the carbon footprint calculation of each zoning plan in the development area.All energy demands are included in energy balance, either fuel demands or electrical demand of transport sector; Projection is made of future share of electric mobilty, rest is covered with synthetic fuels to achieve climate neutralitynot includedMobility is not included in the energy model.
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]2.31.40.066135.7150.1485.5
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.330.30.01231.760.1095.8
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P011: PVnoyesyesyesyesyesnoyesyes
      A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]1.10.77706640.0580.54
      A2P011: Windnonononononononono
      A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Hydrononononononononono
      A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_elnonononononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: PVT_elnonononononononono
      A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Othernonononononononono
      A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P012: Geothermalyesnononoyesyesnoyesyes
      A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]5
      A2P012: Solar Thermalyesyesnonononononono
      A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_heatyesnononononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.1
      A2P012: Waste heat+HPyesnoyesnoyesnononono
      A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]1.7
      A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: PVT_thyesnononononononono
      A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Othernonononononononono
      A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesGeothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centersWaste heat from cooling the ice rink.53 MW PV potential in all three quarters; no other internal renewable energy potentials known*Annual energy use below is presentedin primary energy consumption
      A2P014: Annual energy use
      A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]2.10.0790.819016132.50.19411.3
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]0.00110.03685.76
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0-10
      A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P017: Gasnonononononononono
      A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
      A2P017: Coalnonononononononono
      A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
      A2P017: Oilnonononononononono
      A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
      A2P017: Othernonononononononono
      A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P018: PVnononoyesyesnononono
      A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Windnononoyesyesnononono
      A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Hydronononoyesyesnononono
      A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_elnononoyesyesnononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: PVT_elnonononononononono
      A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Othernonononononononoyes
      A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]5.26
      A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P019: Geothermalnonononononononono
      A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononononono
      A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_heatnonononoyesnononono
      A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonononoyesnononono
      A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: PVT_thnonononononononono
      A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnononoyesnonononono
      A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Othernonononononononono
      A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary000000001.0532319391635
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]-1044-0.000430
      A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
      A2P022: Safety & SecurityPersonal Safety
      A2P022: HealthCO2) levels, Predicted Mean Vote,Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied, Temperature, Relative Humidity, Illuminance, Daylight factor, Sound pressure levelsHealthy community
      A2P022: Education
      A2P022: MobilityyesSustainable mobility
      A2P022: EnergyEnergy demand (heating and hot water), Energy demand (cooling), Cooling demand, Distributin losses, PV production, RES production, OER, Primafry Non-renewable energy balance, AMR, HMR, CO2 balanceNon-renewable primary energy balance, Renewable energy ratio, Grid Purchase factor, Load cover factor/Self-generation, Supply cover factor/Self-consumption, Net energy/Net power, Peak delivered/exported power, Connection capacity credit, Total greenhouse gas emissionsyesNOn-renewable primary energy balance, renewable energy ratio, grid purchase factor, load cover factor/self-generation, supply cover factor/self-consumption, net energy/net power, peak delivered/peak expoted, total greenhouse gas emissionOn-site energy ratio
      A2P022: Water
      A2P022: Economic developmentInvestment cost, Caputal cost, Operation cost, payback period, NPV, cummulated cash flow, savings, Life cycle, ROI, SROIInvestment costs, Share of investments covered by grants, Maintenance-related costs, Requirement-related costs, Operation-related costs, Other costs, Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return, Economic Value Added, Payback Period, nZEB Cost Comparisoncapital costs, operational cots, overall economic performance (5 KPIs)
      A2P022: Housing and CommunitySpecify the associated KPIsAccess to services, Affordability of energy, Affordability of housing, Democratic legitimacy, Living conditions, Social cohesion, Personal safety, Energy consciousnessyesdemographic composition, diverse community, social cohesion
      A2P022: Waste
      A2P022: OtherSmartness and flecibility, Indoor Environmental Quality, Social performance - Equity (affordable housing, access to servicees and amenitioes, afforability of energy, living conditions, sustinable mobility, universal design)
      A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
      A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesyesyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
      A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsyesyesnonononoyesnono
      A2P023: Wind Turbinesnonononononononono
      A2P023: Geothermal energy systemyesnononoyesyesyesyesyes
      A2P023: Waste heat recoveryyesnoyesnoyesnoyesnoyes
      A2P023: Waste to energyyesnononoyesnoyesnono
      A2P023: Polygenerationnonononoyesnononono
      A2P023: Co-generationnonononononoyesnono
      A2P023: Heat Pumpyesyesyesyesyesnoyesyesno
      A2P023: Hydrogennonononononoyesnono
      A2P023: Hydropower plantnonononononoyesnono
      A2P023: Biomassnonononoyesnoyesnono
      A2P023: Biogasnonononononoyesnono
      A2P023: OtherThe technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case.
      A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
      A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)yesyesyesnoyesnoyesnoyes
      A2P024: Energy management systemyesyesyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
      A2P024: Demand-side managementyesnoyesnoyesyesyesyesno
      A2P024: Smart electricity gridnonononoyesyesyesnoyes
      A2P024: Thermal Storageyesnononoyesnoyesnoyes
      A2P024: Electric Storageyesyesnonoyesnoyesnoyes
      A2P024: District Heating and Coolingyesnoyesnoyesnoyesnono
      A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsyesyesyesnoyesnoyesyesno
      A2P024: P2P – buildingsnononoyesnoyesyesnono
      A2P024: OtherThe technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case.
      A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
      A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnoyesyesyesnonoyesnono
      A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsyesnonoyesnonoyesnono
      A2P025: High-performance new buildingsyesnononoyesyesnoyesyes
      A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)yesyesnonononononoyes
      A2P025: Urban data platformsyesnoyesnononoyesnono
      A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnonononononononono
      A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)noyesyesnoyesyesnoyesyes
      A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononononononono
      A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnoyesnonononononono
      A2P025: Smart surveillancenonononononononono
      A2P025: OtherThe technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case.
      A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
      A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)noyesnonoyesnoyesnono
      A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)nonononoyesyesyesnoyes
      A2P026: e-Mobilityyesyesnonoyesyesyesnoyes
      A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnonononoyesnoyesnono
      A2P026: Car-free areanonononononononono
      A2P026: OtherLocal transportation hub with direct connection to metro & bus terminal; parking spaces for 1,400 bicycles and for 1,300 cars Promoting e-Mobility: 134 charging stations, A technical reservation for expanding EV charging system 1400 bicycle racks and charging cabinets for 10 e-bicycle batteries
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notesShared mobility: a mobility point will be implemented and ensure the flexible use of different mobility services.
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesYesYesYesYesYesNoYesYes
      A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance CertificateThe Municipal Buildings have an energy certificate, according to the Portuguese legislation.National standards apply.Energy Performance CertificateEPC = 0, energy neutral buildingEnergy Performance Certificate => Energy efficiency class B (2018 version)
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoNoYesNoNoYes
      A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesKlimaaktiv certificate, Greenpass certificateLEED (Core & Shell, v4) GOLD certification, Smart Building certification (GOLD)
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • New development strategies,
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Urban Renewal Strategies,
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
      • Smart cities strategies,
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC)
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • New development strategies,
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Smart cities strategies
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • New development strategies,
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyCarbon neutrality 2050Carbon-Neutral Vantaa by 2030 (min. 80 % reduction of yearly emissions, capture or compensation os the residual 20 %),Climate neutrality by 2035Relevant city strategies behind PED development in Espoo include the following: - The Espoo Story: Sustainability is heavily included within the values and goals of the current Espoo city strategy, also known as the Espoo Story, running from 2021 to 2025. For example, the strategy names being a responsible pioneer as one of the main values of the city and has chosen achieving carbon neutrality by 2030 as one of the main goals of the current council term. In addition to the Espoo story, four cross-administrative development programmes act as cooperation platforms that allow the city, together with its partners, to develop innovative solutions through experiments and pilot projects in line with the Espoo Story. The Sustainable Espoo development programme is one of the four programmes, thus putting sustainability on the forefront in city development work. - EU Mission: 100 climate-neutral and smart cities by 2030: Cities selected for the Mission commit to achieving carbon-neutrality in 2030. A key tool in the Mission is the Climate City Contract. Each selected city will prepare and implement its contracts in collaboration with local businesses as well as other stakeholders and residents. - Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy: Espoo is committed to the Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy, under which the signatories commit to supporting the European Union’s 40% greenhouse gas emission reduction goal by 2030. The Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP) is a key instrument for implementing the agreement. The Action Plan outlines the key measures the city will take to achieve its carbon neutrality goal. The plan also includes a mapping of climate change risks and vulnerabilities, adaptation measures, emission calculations, emission reduction scenarios and impact estimations of measures. The SECAP of the City of Espoo is available here (only available in Finnish). - UN Sustainable development Goals: The city of Espoo has committed to becoming a forerunner and achieving the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) by 2025. The goal is to make Espoo financially, ecologically, socially, and culturally sustainable. - The Circular Cities Declaration: At the end of 2020, Espoo signed the Europe-wide circular economy commitment Circular Cities Declaration. The ten goals of the declaration promote the implementation of the city’s circular economy. - Espoo Clean Heat: Fortum and the City of Espoo are committed to producing carbon-neutral district heating in the network operating in the areas of Espoo, Kauniainen and Kirkkonummi during the 2020s. The district heating network provides heating to some 250,000 end-users in homes and offices. Coal will be completely abandoned in the production of district heating by 2025. The main targets related to PED development included in the noted city strategies are the following: - Espoo will achieve carbon neutrality by 2030. To be precise, this carbon neutrality goal is defined as an 80% emission reduction from the 1990 level by the year 2030. The remaining 20% share can be absorbed in carbon sinks or compensated by other means. - District heating in Espoo will be carbon-neutral by 2029, and coal-based production will be phased out from district heating by 2025. - Espoo aims to end the use of fossil fuels in the heating of city-owned buildings by 2025. - Quantitative goals within the Espoo SECAP report: - Espoo aims to reduce total energy consumption within the municipal sector by 7.5% by the end of 2025 in comparison to the 2015 level. The social housing company Espoon Asunnot OY aims to meet the same target. - Espoo aims to cover 10% of the energy consumption of new buildings via on-site production. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of cycling to 15% by 2024. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of public transport by 1.1% yearly. - Espoo aims to reduce the emissions of bus transport by 90% by the end of 2025, when compared to 2010 levels.
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
      • Electrification of Cooking Methods,
      • Biogas
      • Other
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
      • Biogas,
      • Hydrogen
      A3P003: OtherAt a national level there are some studies regarding the decarbonization of the gas grid, but no concrete strategies so far.
      A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
      A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesFreiburg has ambitious goals and wants to achieve climate neutrality until 2035, the PED concept could help to develop suitable strategies on district level- Citycon (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) aims to be carbon neutral in its energy use by 2030 - Lippulaiva is a unique urban centre with state-of-the-art energy concept. The centre has a smart managing system, which allows for example the temporary reduction of power used in air conditioning and charging stations when energy consumption is at its peak. In addition, a backup generator and a large electric battery will balance the operation of the electricity network. - Lippulaiva is also an important mobility hub for the people of Espoo. Espoonlahti metro station is located under the centre, and the West Metro started to operate to Espoonlahti in December 2022. Lippulaiva also has a bus terminal, which serves the metro’s feeder traffic in the Espoonlahti major district.
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviourIn Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed.Energy efficiency by renovation measures for buildings and measures for saving electricity; electrification by installation of heat pumps and photovoltaics and switching to electric cars, additional measures not directly related to PED like sustainable diet and sharing economyFor Citycon, it was important to engage local people within the Lippulaiva project. During the construction period as well as after opening of the shopping center, citizens have been engaged in multiple ways, such as informing local citizens of the progress of construction, engaging young people in the design processes of the shopping centre and long-term commitment of youngsters with Lippulaiva Buddy class initiative. Users’ engagement activities are conducted in close co-operation with SPARCS partners.
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      • Innovative business models,
      • Blockchain
      • Innovative business models,
      • PPP models,
      • Existing incentives
      • Innovative business models,
      • PPP models,
      • Existing incentives
      • Local trading,
      • Existing incentives
      • Innovative business models,
      • PPP models,
      • Life Cycle Cost,
      • Circular economy models
      • Innovative business models,
      • Local trading
      • Demand management Living Lab,
      • Local trading,
      • Existing incentives
      • Innovative business models
      A3P006: Other
      A3P007: Social models
      A3P007: Social models
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Citizen Social Research,
      • Prevention of energy poverty,
      • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Prevention of energy poverty,
      • Digital Inclusion,
      • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
      • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Affordability
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
      • Quality of Life,
      • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
      • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
      • Citizen Social Research,
      • Policy Forums,
      • Quality of Life,
      • Strategies towards social mix,
      • Affordability,
      • Prevention of energy poverty,
      • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
      • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
      • Social incentives,
      • Quality of Life,
      • Strategies towards social mix,
      • Affordability,
      • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
      • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
      • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Social incentives,
      • Quality of Life
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
      A3P007: Other
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      • Strategic urban planning,
      • District Energy plans,
      • City Vision 2050,
      • SECAP Updates
      • City Vision 2050,
      • SECAP Updates,
      • Building / district Certification
      • Strategic urban planning,
      • City Vision 2050,
      • SECAP Updates
      • Strategic urban planning,
      • SECAP Updates
      • Building / district Certification
      • Strategic urban planning,
      • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
      • District Energy plans
      • Building / district Certification
      A3P008: Other
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      • Energy Neutral
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Net zero carbon footprint,
      • Pollutants Reduction
      • Net zero carbon footprint
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Net zero carbon footprint,
      • Carbon-free
      • Net zero carbon footprint,
      • Life Cycle approach,
      • Greening strategies,
      • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone
      • Other
      A3P009: OtherCarbon free in terms of energy
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsAt national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen:  Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation.  Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries.  The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals.  Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricity- Energy efficiency regulations (Directive 2006/32/EC and 2009/72/EC) - EU directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings => all new buildings should be “nearly zero-energy buildings” (nZEB) from 2021
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionOnsite Energy Ratio > 1Neutralpath-project is working with the cocept of PCEDs = Positive and Clean Energy Districts (energy-efficient and energy-flexible districts with net zero greenhouse gas emissions and a surplus of renewable energy). Aviapolis Climate-Neutral Lab will work with both PCED and PCED relevant cases within the district.Assessment methods for this ped (and for germany) is defined in this project at the moment and will be tested at that case studyThe demonstration projects is a new residential development, which consists of an apartment complex which includes 39 apartments spread over 3 floors. It is a sustainble plus energy neighbouhood, and has reached a plus energy balance on its first year in operation. It has MPC controls on the individual heat pumps to improve the energy flexibility of the apartments. It includes the "social beatiful" concepts with a strong emphasis on the social sustainability of the project.Lippulaiva is a project with high level goal in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production.
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentStrategic, economicAccording to Vantaa city strategy 2021-2025 Aviapolis area aims to become the greenest airport city in Europe. The district is transforming from a logistics and business focused area to a lively urban district which gives an opportunity to rethink the areas energy solutions. With Neutralpath-project Vantaa aims to support the development of the district's energy system and explore innovative, energy efficient and fossil free district energy solutions.City is interested in transforming the quarter, as many buildings are old, have private owner structures and have decentralised heating systems. As the city wants to become climate neutral by 2035 action is needed now. In the research project PED urban the idea is to focus on the future energy system of the quarter and use it as a case study to develop a common assessment method for PEDs in alignment with european efforts in that regardThe need for social housing and the ambition to create a great living environment with a high-performance apartment complex, supplied with renewable energy. It results in lower energy bills for the tenants and high-quality homes.- Citycon’s (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) target is to be carbon neutral by 2030 - Increasing sustainability requirements from the financing, tenants, cities, other stakeholders
      B1P003: Environment of the case study area
      B2P003: Environment of the case study areaUrban areaRurbanUrban areaSuburban areaSuburban areaSuburban areaUrban area
      B1P004: Type of district
      B2P004: Type of district
      • New construction,
      • Renovation
      • Renovation
      • New construction,
      • Renovation
      • New construction
      • Renovation
      • New construction
      • New construction
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      • New Development,
      • Retrofitting Area
      • Retrofitting Area,
      • Preservation Area
      • Re-use / Transformation Area,
      • New Development
      • New Development
      • Retrofitting Area
      • New Development
      • Re-use / Transformation Area,
      • New Development
      B1P006: Year of construction
      B1P006: Year of construction20242022
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential5898
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential5898
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
      B1P011: Population density before intervention
      B1P011: Population density before intervention000000000
      B1P012: Population density after intervention
      B1P012: Population density after intervention0000000.001198780487804900
      B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
      B1P013: Residentialnonoyesyesyesnoyesnono
      B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Officenonoyesyesyesnoyesnono
      B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Industry and Utilitynonononoyesnoyesnono
      B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Commercialnonononoyesnoyesnoyes
      B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Institutionalnonononoyesnoyesnono
      B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Natural areasnononononoyesyesnoyes
      B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Recreationalnonoyesnoyesnoyesnono
      B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Dismissed areasnonononoyesnononono
      B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Othernonononononononono
      B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
      B1P014: Residentialnonoyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
      B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]2394
      B1P014: Officenonoyesyesyesnoyesnono
      B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonononoyesnoyesnono
      B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Commercialnonononoyesnoyesnoyes
      B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Institutionalnonononoyesnoyesnono
      B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Natural areasnononononoyesyesnono
      B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Recreationalnonoyesnoyesnoyesnono
      B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononononononono
      B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Othernonononononononono
      B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionGroningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city.Neutralpath-project is working with the cocept of PCEDs = Positive and Clean Energy Districts (energy-efficient and energy-flexible districts with net zero greenhouse gas emissions and a surplus of renewable energy). Aviapolis Climate-Neutral Lab will work with both PCED and PCED relevant cases within the district.
      B2P002: Installation life time
      B2P002: Installation life timeThe MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact.Permanent installation
      B2P003: Scale of action
      B2P003: ScaleDistrictVirtualDistrict
      B2P004: Operator of the installation
      B2P004: Operator of the installationThe Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties.CM Maia, IPMAIA, NEW, AdEP.The City of Vantaa manages the lab, working closely with landowners and other stakeholders such as energy companies, solution providers, universities and citizens.
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materialsGroningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materials
      B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
      B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?NoNo
      B2P006: Other
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      • Civic
      • Strategic
      • Strategic
      B2P007: Other
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipalityMunicipalityMunicipality
      B2P008: Other
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      • Academia,
      • Private,
      • Industrial,
      • Other
      • Academia,
      • Private,
      • Industrial,
      • Citizens, public, NGO,
      • Other
      • Academia,
      • Private,
      • Industrial,
      • Citizens, public, NGO
      B2P009: Otherresearch companies, monitoring company, ict companyEnergy Agency
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      • Buildings,
      • Demand-side management,
      • Energy storage,
      • Energy networks,
      • Waste management,
      • Lighting,
      • E-mobility,
      • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
      • Social interactions,
      • Business models
      • Buildings,
      • Demand-side management,
      • Prosumers,
      • Renewable generation,
      • Energy storage,
      • Efficiency measures,
      • Lighting,
      • E-mobility,
      • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
      • Ambient measures,
      • Social interactions
      B2P011: Other
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      • Tools for prototyping and modelling
      • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
      • Tools, spaces, events for testing and validation
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external peopleDepends on the building: _Tecmaia is open to the public but the buildings are for the exclusive use of companies allocated at the industrial site; _The municipal buildings have public access; _The residential buildings have an exclusive use for the residents.
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      • Execution plan,
      • Available data,
      • Type of measured data,
      • Equipment,
      • Level of access
      • Execution plan,
      • Available data,
      • Type of measured data
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      • Energy,
      • Social,
      • Economical / Financial
      • Energy,
      • Environmental,
      • Social,
      • Economical / Financial
      • Energy,
      • Environmental,
      • Social,
      • Economical / Financial
      B2P016: Execution of operations
      B2P016: Execution of operationsCurrent PED status (WP5 SPARCS): Conceptualization and methodology definition of the (virtual) PED for Maia Municipality with real monitoring and assessment in order to replicate and scale up to a city-level PED. The financial investments were already targeted.
      B2P017: Capacities
      B2P017: Capacities_Energy production and storage, _Monitoring; _Digitization.
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholdersThe relationship with stakeholders (municipal companies, industry, citizens, etc) has been fundamental for the definition of the PED. In this sense, some sessions were organized to gather different points of view in order to trace the best path for the PED. Also, the participation of Maia Municipality in EU projects, as EHHUR and OMEGA-X, makes possible the share of knowledge between different partners.
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P019: Available tools
      • Energy modelling,
      • Social models,
      • Business and financial models
      • Energy modelling,
      • Social models,
      • Business and financial models,
      • Fundraising and accessing resources,
      • Matching actors
      • Energy modelling
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P020: External accessibility
      B2P020: External accessibilityTo follow the lab and Vantaa's activities in Neutralpath, fill in the following form: https://neutralpath.eu/fi/tayta-lomake-liittyaksesi-cn-labiin/
      C1P001: Unlocking Factors
      C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
      C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
      C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
      C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
      C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
      C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
      C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
      C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important
      C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)Collaboration with the local partnersReal-estate market situation
      C1P002: Driving Factors
      C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
      C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important
      C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)Earthquakes due to gas extraction
      C1P003: Administrative barriers
      C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)Fragmented financial support; lack of experimental budget for complex projects, etc.Delay in the Environmental Dialogue processing in the municipality
      C1P004: Policy barriers
      C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)Different priorities; overall problematic system od decentralization powers; non-fuctioning model of local development funding, etc.
      C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
      C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P005: Non-effective regulations3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
      C1P006: Environmental barriers
      C1P006: Environmental barriers
      C1P007: Technical barriers
      C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P007: Deficient planning2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P007: Lack of well-defined process3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)Inadequate regulation towards energy transition
      C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
      C1P008: Inertia2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Rebound effect2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
      C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
      C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
      C1P010: Financial barriers
      C1P010: Hidden costs2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P010: Risk and uncertainty3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
      C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
      C1P011: Market barriers
      C1P011: Split incentives5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P011: Energy price distortion4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
      C1P012: Stakeholders involved
      C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Planning/leading
      • Planning/leading
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: Research & Innovation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      C1P012: Financial/Funding
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      • Planning/leading
      • None
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • None
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Business process management
      • Planning/leading
      • Planning/leading
      • None
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: Urban Services providers
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Planning/leading
      • None
      • None
      C1P012: Real Estate developers
      • Construction/implementation
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Planning/leading
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • None
      • Planning/leading,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Design/Construction companies
      • Construction/implementation
      • Planning/leading
      • Construction/implementation
      • Construction/implementation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
      • None
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Construction/implementation
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Construction/implementation
      • None
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Other
      C1P012: Other (if any)
      Summary

      Authors (framework concept)

      Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

      Contributors (to the content)

      Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

      Implemented by

      Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
      Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)