Name | Project | Type | Compare |
---|---|---|---|
Findhorn, the Park | InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED | ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
Schönbühel an der Donau, Schönbühel-Aggsbach | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Umeå, Ålidhem district | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study | Compare |
Aalborg East | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Uncompare | |
Ankara, Çamlık District | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Trenčín | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Luxembourg, Betzdorf | LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Vantaa, Aviapolis | NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
Vidin, Himik and Bononia | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Oslo, Verksbyen | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
Uden, Loopkantstraat | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Zaragoza, Actur | NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Aarhus, Brabrand | BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city | ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins | PED Case Study | Uncompare |
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study | Compare |
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus | LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Espoo, Kera | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
Freiburg, Waldsee | PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district | PED Case Study | Compare |
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Graz, Reininghausgründe | PED Case Study | Uncompare | |
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Oulu, Kaukovainio | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Halmstad, Fyllinge | PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare | |
Lund, Brunnshög district | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Évora, Portugal | POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Groningen, PED South | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Lab | Compare |
Groningen, PED North | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Lab | |
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Lab | Compare |
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT | PED Lab | Compare | |
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district | STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
Salzburg, Gneis district | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
Tartu, City centre area | SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district | GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab | PED Lab | Uncompare | |
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Uncompare |
Kifissia, Energy community | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Title | Groningen, PED North | Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab | Graz, Reininghausgründe | Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio | Halmstad, Fyllinge | Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district | Espoo, Kera | Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city | Aalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, Denmark |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab | |||||||||
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab | Groningen, PED North | Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab | Graz, Reininghausgründe | Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio | Halmstad, Fyllinge | Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district | Espoo, Kera | Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city | Aalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, Denmark |
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet | |||||||||
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet |
|
| |||||||
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site | |||||||||
PED case study | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | yes | yes | no |
PED relevant case study | no | no | no | yes | yes | no | yes | no | yes |
PED Lab. | yes | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab | |||||||||
Climate neutrality | yes | no | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | yes |
Annual energy surplus | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
Energy community | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | no | no | yes | no |
Circularity | yes | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
Air quality and urban comfort | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
Electrification | no | yes | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | no |
Net-zero energy cost | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
Net-zero emission | yes | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous) | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
Maximise self-sufficiency | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | yes |
Other | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no |
Other (A1P004) | Green IT | Net-zero emission; Annual energy surplus | |||||||
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab | |||||||||
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED Lab | Implementation Phase | In operation | Implementation Phase | Planning Phase | Planning Phase | Implementation Phase | Planning Phase | Planning Phase | Planning Phase |
A1P006: Start Date | |||||||||
A1P006: Start date | 12/18 | 01/2011 | 2019 | 01/21 | 01/15 | 01/24 | 11/22 | ||
A1P007: End Date | |||||||||
A1P007: End date | 12/23 | 02/2013 | 2025 | 01/30 | 12/35 | 12/26 | 11/25 | ||
A1P008: Reference Project | |||||||||
A1P008: Reference Project | |||||||||
A1P009: Data availability | |||||||||
A1P009: Data availability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
A1P009: Other | |||||||||
A1P010: Sources | |||||||||
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab |
|
| |||||||
A1P011: Geographic coordinates | |||||||||
X Coordinate (longitude): | 6.535121 | 2.1 | 15.407440 | 15.394495 | 12.92054 | 12.318458 | 24.75377778 | 24.08168339 | 10.007 |
Y Coordinate (latitude): | 53.234846 | 41.3 | 47.0607 | 60.486609 | 56.65194 | 51.326492 | 60.21622222 | 56.95245956 | 57.041028 |
A1P012: Country | |||||||||
A1P012: Country | Netherlands | Spain | Austria | Sweden | Sweden | Germany | Finland | Latvia | Denmark |
A1P013: City | |||||||||
A1P013: City | Groningen | Barcelona and Tarragona | Graz | Borlänge | Halmstad | Leipzig | Espoo | Riga | Aalborg |
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification) | |||||||||
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification). | Cfa | Csa | Dfb | Dsb | Dwb | Dfb | Dfb | Cfb | Dfb |
A1P015: District boundary | |||||||||
A1P015: District boundary | Functional | Virtual | Geographic | Geographic | Geographic | Functional | Geographic | Geographic | Virtual |
Other | Geographic | ||||||||
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab | |||||||||
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab: | Mixed | Public | Mixed | Mixed | Mixed | Mixed | Public | Public | |
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure | |||||||||
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure: | Multiple Owners | Single Owner | Multiple Owners | Single Owner | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | Multiple Owners | |
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED | |||||||||
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED | 7 | 0 | 100 | 10 | 250 | 2 | 15 | ||
A1P019: Conditioned space | |||||||||
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²] | 1.01 | 3700 | 17000 | 170000 | |||||
A1P020: Total ground area | |||||||||
A1P020: Total ground area [m²] | 17.132 | 1000000 | 9945 | 30000 | 580000 | 119264 | 31308000 | ||
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area | |||||||||
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
A1P022: Financial schemes | |||||||||
A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estate | yes | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||||||
A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO scheme | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||||||
A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Other | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||||||
A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural funding | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||||||
A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National funding | yes | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||||||
A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional funding | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||||||
A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal funding | yes | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||||||
A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Other | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||||||
A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EU | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | no |
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | 7500000 | ||||||||
A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - National | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||||||
A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regional | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||||||
A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Other | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||||||
A1P022: Other | Multiple different funding schemes depending on the case. | ||||||||
A1P023: Economic Targets | |||||||||
A1P023: Economic Targets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A1P023: Other | Sustainable and replicable business models regarding renewable energy systems | Circular economy | |||||||
A1P024: More comments: | |||||||||
A1P024: More comments: | Semi-Virtual Energy Integration Laboratory (SEILAB) The Energy Smart Lab is an infrastructure conceived as a flexible and versatile platform for innovative technological developments for both industry and competitive R+D projects. The areas of expertise of this laboratory pivot around the following technologies: – Power Electronics for the integration and control of the elements within a building or community: Renewable Energy Sources (RES), Energy Storage Systems and Electric Vehicles (EV) – ICT Platform for smart communications and energy management of systems, building, networks and communities. – Energy System Integration technologies for smart and flexible buildings and grids including RES and EV. The laboratory operation is based on the hardware emulation approach, which allows for real physical equipment to be operated under a broad range of scenarios without depending on the real occurrence of the boundary conditions suitable for the experimental validation. The laboratory is pioneer in addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation. | The “Reininghausgründe” are a new quarter near the centre of the City of Graz. In the area of a former brewery, close to more, still working industries, a new town centre is being established. It will include living areas, workplaces, shops, schools and a park, so that the need for individual mobility is minimized. It is connected to the city centre by bike paths, busses and a tram. Car sharing is provided as well. Some key-energy aspects: • characteristic 1: For the heat supply in the innovative Reininghaus energy model, low-temperature waste heat from a nearby steel plant is harnessed through the use of heat pumps. • characteristic 2: The district heating system operates at low temperatures. • characteristic 3: Generated heat that is not used immediately is stored in the power tower and supplied on demand. Other important aspects of the project are the following: • characteristic 1: Most houses are low-energy houses, some of the certified with the “Klima Aktiv” label • characteristic 2: There are extremely few parking possibilities for residents and visitors; this will foster the use of public transport and bikes • characteristic 3: All the necessary infrastructure for the “daily need” can be reached within walking distance The area of the project is going to be very “green” when finished. Featuring a big district parc, lots of other green spaces are in planning. | |||||||
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs | |||||||||
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR] | |||||||||
Contact person for general enquiries | |||||||||
A1P026: Name | Jasper Tonen, Elisabeth Koops | Dr. Jaume Salom, Dra. Cristina Corchero | Katharina Schwarz | Jingchun Shen | Markus Olofsgård | Simon Baum | Joni Mäkinen | Judith Stiekema | Kristian Olesen |
A1P027: Organization | Municipality of Groningen | IREC | StadtLABOR, Innovationen für urbane Lebensqualität GmbH | Högskolan Dalarna | AFRY | CENERO Energy GmbH | City of Espoo | OASC | Aalborg University |
A1P028: Affiliation | Municipality / Public Bodies | Research Center / University | SME / Industry | Research Center / University | Other | Other | Municipality / Public Bodies | Other | Research Center / University |
A1P028: Other | CENERO Energy GmbH | not for profit private organisation | |||||||
A1P029: Email | Jasper.tonen@groningen.nl | Jsalom@irec.cat | katharina.schwarz@stadtlaborgraz.at | jih@du.se | markus.olofsgard@afry.com | sib@cenero.de | joni.makinen@espoo.fi | judith@oascities.org | Kristian@plan.aau.dk |
Contact person for other special topics | |||||||||
A1P030: Name | Hans Schnitzer | Xingxing Zhang | Simon Baum | Alex Søgaard Moreno | |||||
A1P031: Email | hans.schnitzer@stadtlaborgraz.at | xza@du.se | sib@cenero.de | asm@aalborg.dk | |||||
Pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
A2P001: Fields of application | |||||||||
A2P001: Fields of application |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A2P001: Other | Urban Management; Air Quality | ||||||||
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields | |||||||||
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields | Energy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streams | Energy SmartLab capacities - Building simulation model: thermal inertia and thermal loads of a building or community can be co-simulated with a building model. – System Operator and Aggregator simulation models: the interaction with remote control actions carried out by electricity System Operators or flexibility Aggregators can be simulated as well. – Grid simulation model: the physical interaction of the building with the grid power supply can be simulated enabling the experimental validation of flexibility services to the network. Energy SmartLab systems - SAFT Li-ion battery: maximum stored energy 20000 Wh, rated power 150 kW, rated discharge current 200 A, rated charge current 34 A, operating voltage 189 V – 227 V – 254 V, capacity 82 Ah. – Ultracapacitors: maximum stored energy 57 Wh, rated power 10 kW, rated current 20 A, peak current (<1s) 200 Apk, operating voltage 250 V – 500 V, capacity 1,65 F. – Electric vehicle second life battery: maximum stored energy 23300 Wh, rated power 40 kW, rated current 150 A, operating voltage 240 V – 400 V, capacity 32 Ah - 5 microgrid emulators (emulated power 5.5 kVA, max generation connected 10kVA, max consumption connected 10 kVA) - 1 grid emulator (Rated power: 200 kVA, Rated current per phase: 350 A, Rated current per neutral conductor: 35) | Energy efficiency: o Several activities: Workshops, Webinars to deepen the knowledge and raise awareness renewable energies o for example rooftop Photovoltaics green & blue infrastructures o Parks, Rooftop Gardens, Quarter Parks, Water elements included in the parks rooftop farming o To produce vegetables in the quarter stormwater management mobility o less parking and less cars in the district. Solutions for boosting public transport with sponsored public transport tickets; building of better bike and pedestrian infrastructure social aspects o district management was established in the district local supply of goods of daily need o Schools within 15 minutes walking distance Supermarkets and other shops within the district | Load calculation and system optimisation: City Energy Analyst Identification of stranded assets for asset owners and investors to understand the carbon risks: CRREM | link based regulation of electricity grid | - Kera development commitment (https://www.espoo.fi/en/kera-development-commitment). - SPARCS Co-creation model for sustainable and smart urban areas (www.co-creatingsparcs.fi/en). - Kera area carbon neutrality roadmap (https://static.espoo.fi/cdn/ff/MHDdcMNJ9aYn7CjpoD4zNpo5M-M9HIDLXlJdUrUmf-8/1642756766/public/2022-01/Kera%20carbon%20neutrality%20map_EN.pdf) | A suite of replicable modeling tools will enable stakeholders to analyze planning actions towards positive energy in a cost-effective fashion, aiding their evidence based decision-making process. The tools will be able to model the district’s energy production and demand, optimize for flexibility and simulate mobility and transport. By employing gamification and co-creation approaches, the project will enhance public awareness and engagement in energy efficiency. The project will culminate in the publication of practical guidelines, reusable models, algorithms, and training materials to aid other cities to replicate the digital twin for their districts, fostering widespread adoption of sustainable energy practices. | Stakeholder engagement, expert energy system analysis, future scenarios | |
A2P003: Application of ISO52000 | |||||||||
A2P003: Application of ISO52000 | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | ||
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance | |||||||||
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | |
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance | |||||||||
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | |
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation | |||||||||
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation | Mobility, till now, is not included in the energy model. | – Electric vehicle second life battery: maximum stored energy 23300 Wh, rated power 40 kW, rated current 150 A, operating voltage 240 V – 400 V, capacity 32 Ah | - Number of cars per household - Fraction of electric cars - Number of public transport tickets (week/ annual tickets) | The university operates a fleet of 13 electric vehicles (EV) (61kW power each). There are 5 EV charging stations on campus. | Large combined industrial, residential, and commercial area with complex flows of in- and outgoing traffic. | ||||
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand | |||||||||
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum] | 2.3 | 0.6777 | 1.65 | 54.5 | 8000 | 218 | |||
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand | |||||||||
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum] | 0.33 | 0.03656 | 19.4 | 5000 | 148 | ||||
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility | |||||||||
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum] | 0 | 0 | |||||||
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure | |||||||||
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum] | 0 | ||||||||
A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year | |||||||||
A2P011: PV | no | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | yes | no | no |
A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 4 | ||||||||
A2P011: Wind | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | yes |
A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P011: Hydro | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P011: Biomass_el | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P011: PVT_el | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no |
A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.01818 | ||||||||
A2P011: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year | |||||||||
A2P012: Geothermal | yes | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P012: Solar Thermal | yes | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P012: Biomass_heat | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.1 | ||||||||
A2P012: Waste heat+HP | yes | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | yes |
A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 300 | ||||||||
A2P012: Biomass_peat_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P012: PVT_th | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.0825 | ||||||||
A2P012: Biomass_firewood_th | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P012: Other | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes | |||||||||
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes | Geothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centers | Groundwater (used for heat pumps) | Local energy utility will implement district level thermal solution. First, energy will be produced from waste heat from a local data center. Further thermal solutions are under discussion and development. | Conventional power generation: The university’s heat supply is designed as a local centralized heat supply system. Electrical power, generated in combined heat and power (CHP) units, is delivered to the distribution network and sold to energy traders as regulated by local legislation and norms. There are two natural gas burners acting as heat sources (3MW and 6MW capacity), and two CHP units (1.6MW and 0.45MW thermal capacity). All heating is supplied from the CHP plants. Renewable Energy Sources (RES): a wind turbine (3.6 kW) and PV panels (11.7 kW) are connected to the faculty microgrid. In the future it is planned to power the campus entirely from local RES. | Very little wind production currently exists in the area. The electricity production of the waste incineration plant will be included at a later date. Aalborg East is partly a remarkable area for hosting a Portland cement factory that accounts for a substantial share of Denmark’s total CO2 emissions. In turn, it also provides waste heat to the district heating grid for all of Aalborg city and some of the smaller towns that are connected to the same DH grid. | ||||
A2P014: Annual energy use | |||||||||
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum] | 0.318 | 2.421 | 78.8 | 620 | |||||
A2P015: Annual energy delivered | |||||||||
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum] | 0.2055 | 15.4 | 399 | ||||||
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year | |||||||||
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | 0 | 0 | |||||||
A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year | |||||||||
A2P017: Gas | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P017: Coal | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P017: Oil | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P017: Other | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | 0 | 300 | |||||||
A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year | |||||||||
A2P018: PV | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P018: Wind | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P018: Hydro | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P018: Biomass_el | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P018: Biomass_peat_el | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P018: PVT_el | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P018: Other | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | 0.187 | ||||||||
A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year | |||||||||
A2P019: Geothermal | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P019: Solar Thermal | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P019: Biomass_heat | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P019: Waste heat+HP | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P019: Biomass_peat_heat | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P019: PVT_th | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P019: Biomass_firewood_th | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||||||
A2P019: Other | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0 | ||||||||
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary | |||||||||
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.53839572192513 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED | |||||||||
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum] | 0.036 | 6.93 | 450000 | ||||||
A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab | |||||||||
A2P022: Safety & Security | none | ||||||||
A2P022: Health | thermal comfort diagram | ||||||||
A2P022: Education | none | ||||||||
A2P022: Mobility | x | none | |||||||
A2P022: Energy | x | normalized CO2/GHG & Energy intensity | apply | ||||||
A2P022: Water | x | ||||||||
A2P022: Economic development | x | cost of excess emissions | |||||||
A2P022: Housing and Community | x | ||||||||
A2P022: Waste | |||||||||
A2P022: Other | |||||||||
A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation | |||||||||
A2P023: Photovoltaics | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | no | yes |
A2P023: Solar thermal collectors | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P023: Wind Turbines | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P023: Geothermal energy system | yes | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P023: Waste heat recovery | yes | no | yes | yes | no | no | yes | no | yes |
A2P023: Waste to energy | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P023: Polygeneration | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P023: Co-generation | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P023: Heat Pump | yes | no | yes | yes | no | no | yes | no | yes |
A2P023: Hydrogen | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P023: Hydropower plant | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P023: Biomass | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P023: Biogas | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P023: Other | |||||||||
A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility | |||||||||
A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | yes | no |
A2P024: Energy management system | yes | yes | no | no | no | no | yes | yes | yes |
A2P024: Demand-side management | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
A2P024: Smart electricity grid | no | yes | no | no | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
A2P024: Thermal Storage | yes | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | yes | yes |
A2P024: Electric Storage | yes | yes | no | no | no | no | no | yes | yes |
A2P024: District Heating and Cooling | yes | no | yes | yes | no | no | yes | yes | yes |
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systems | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | yes |
A2P024: P2P – buildings | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P024: Other | |||||||||
A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency | |||||||||
A2P025: Deep Retrofitting | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildings | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P025: High-performance new buildings | yes | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting) | yes | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
A2P025: Urban data platforms | yes | no | no | no | no | no | yes | yes | no |
A2P025: Mobile applications for citizens | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | yes | no |
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting) | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | yes | yes | no |
A2P025: Smart irrigation | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposal | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P025: Smart surveillance | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P025: Other | |||||||||
A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility | |||||||||
A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private) | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances) | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
A2P026: e-Mobility | yes | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutions | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
A2P026: Car-free area | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P026: Other | |||||||||
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes | |||||||||
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes | - Multimodal mobility nodes - Support of public transport tickets - Mobility consulting - District management | Test-Concept for bidirectional charging. | |||||||
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates | |||||||||
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes | ||
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes | Energy Performance Certificate | Energieausweis mandatory if buildings/ flats/ apartments are sold | |||||||
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates | |||||||||
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | |||
A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes | Klimaaktiv standard Voluntary! Certification can be for buildings and/or quarters. The different quarters are built in different standards. Ranging from bronze/silver/gold | ||||||||
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy | |||||||||
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy | |||||||||
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy | City level targets Klimaschutzplan Graz - 2022 | Targets: - Climate neutrality until 2040 - Social justice and high quality of life - High innovation levels Mobilitätsplan Graz 2040 – under development | Targets: - Modal Split 80:20 until 2040 80% Public transport, bike, walking | 20% cars Kommunales Energiekonzept (2017) | Targets: - Increase of district heating Energiemasterplan Graz (2018) | Targets: - Energy efficiency of urban dwellings and infrastructures - District heating and solar energy - Energy efficiency of private dwellings - Climate conscious mobility National level targets Klimaschutzplan Österreich -draft, expected by 2024 | Targets: - Decarbonisation (reduction of GHG, renewable energies, - Climate neutrality until 2040 - Energy efficiency - Security of energy supply | The study aligns closely with the decarbonisation and energy reduction pathways of residential multi family buildings with 1.5°C global warming target in Sweden. This study will also contribute to the achievement of the carbon neturality of whole Borlänge city by 2030. | Reduction of 1018000 tons CO2 by 2030 | ||||||
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid | |||||||||
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid |
|
|
|
| |||||
A3P003: Other | |||||||||
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities | |||||||||
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities | -Allows for real physical equipment to be operated under a broad range of scenarios without depending on the real occurrence of the boundary conditions suitable for the experimental validation -Pioneer in addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation. | Reininghaus needs green spaces and places Sector coupling of water, waste water, electricity ICT and demand side management Mobility - Reininghaus needs better infrastructure for bikes and pedestrians - Public transportation should be more affordable and Sharing should be implemented in the district Infrastructure should cover daily needs within walking distance Infrastructure for local jobs and shared offices | In our project, we carried out a comprehensive exploration of strategies to achieve positive energy districts in a Swedish residential portfolio. The focus on urban energy transitions necessitates a holistic approach that integrates building retrofit, solar technology exploration, and heating supply optimisation. Exploration of Local Solar Sources: The analysis reveals varying solar irradiance resources throughout the year, emphasizing the importance of strategic placement. Integration of combined photovoltaic and thermal panels into building envelopes demonstrates the potential to cover a significant portion of the energy demand even in Sweden. Heating Supply Optimisation with Solar Technologies: Despite the surplus energy production from on-site solar technology, challenges arise due to temporal energy asymmetry. The introduction of heat pumps emerges as a feasible solution to balance energy gaps, utilising both rejected and free heat. Optimisation scenarios, utilising a combination of geothermal heat pumps, water source heat pumps, and PVT, showcase remarkable reductions in emissions and primary energy consumption. Urban Form and Energy Infrastructure Design: We realised the importance of returning to urban form and energy infrastructure design to optimise future residential portfolio potential. Building layout design, influenced by zoning regulations and innovative typologies, plays a crucial role in achieving district level energy efficiency. Future challenges, including demographic shifts, e-mobility, and climate change, necessitate a more holistic approach to energy infrastructure design, addressing not only heating and electricity demands but also cooling requirements. | Decarbonize part of Aalborg city as a way of working incrementally towards being a zero-emission city. | |||||
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour | |||||||||
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour | In Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed. | -Improving the development of Net Zero Energy Buildings and Flexible Energy buildings. | - citizen participation and promotion of functioning neighbourhoods (e.g., through city district management) As of today, solutions for the energy transition in the residential sector have focused on the construction of energy-efficient buildings and on the energy-efficient refurbishment of existing buildings. Measures to influence user behaviour and to directly address residents and neighbourhoods as actors of the energy transition play a minor role and are also not formalized. At the same time, moving into a new apartment offers a ‘window of opportunity’ to establish new everyday practices and behaviour. In already inhabited housing developments, well-functioning neighbourhoods or existing, ‘sustainability pioneers’ are key to motivating people to adopt more resource-efficient lifestyles. In order to prepare such agents of change towards more climate protection and sustainability in the context of housing, Austria launched the BAREWO project. The aim is to develop a kit of formats, methods, and interventions for resource-efficient housing. This toolkit will be tested in six testbeds, among which quarter 12 (Q12) of Graz- Reininghaus, as soon as first residents move in (approx. 2024). Austrian TRANS-PED partner StadtLABOR, which is also a partner in the BAREWO project, will support Q12 in this process. In parallel, a monitoring system will be developed to make the (climate) effects of the kit measurable. In addition, a guideline for property managers will be developed, which will serve as an orientation for them on how their residents can be coached in matters of climate protection and sustainability in everyday (residential) life. From the very beginning, (communication) measures are implemented and relevant stakeholders are involved in the project (project advisory board) to ensure the multiplicability, financing and broad application of the toolkit. If successful, the toolkit could also be scaled up to other quarters in Reininghaus. | While our investigation primarily centres on technical optimisation within Positive Energy District (PED) development, it is essential to acknowledge the broader scope encompassing social and governance dimensions. Specifically, understanding stakeholders' willingness to embrace technical recommendations upon project completion is important. Several potential influencing factors merit exploration, including economic considerations, technical optimisation-associated embodied carbon balance, the general public's technical perceptions, and operational feasibility. Evaluating these aspects holistically not only enhances the efficacy of PED initiatives but also fosters greater acceptance and participation within the communities they serve. | - Stakeholder engagement; - Focus on implementing renewable energy production where possible; - Rretrofitting and energy optimization of existing buildings. | ||||
A3P006: Economic strategies | |||||||||
A3P006: Economic strategies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A3P006: Other | operational savings through efficiency measures | ||||||||
A3P007: Social models | |||||||||
A3P007: Social models |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A3P007: Other | |||||||||
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies | |||||||||
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
A3P008: Other | |||||||||
A3P009: Environmental strategies | |||||||||
A3P009: Environmental strategies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A3P009: Other | Positive Energy Balance for the demo site | ||||||||
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects | |||||||||
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects | At national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen: Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation. Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries. The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals. Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricity | - European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (‘Renewable energy’ directive - 2018/2001/EU and ‘Common rules for the internal electricity market’ directive- 2019/944/EU). - Spanish building certification is regulated through Royal Decree 235/2013. | Mobility contracts: A mobility contract is concluded between the City of Graz and the property developers in the course of development plans and serves to reduce the motor vehicle traffic to be expected as a result of the construction project. Push & pull measures are agreed: With a lower car parking space key, which is significantly lower than today's usual requirements, offers and information for easier use of public transport, walking and cycling, as well as car sharing and e-mobility are simultaneously created by the property developers, leading to a win-win-win situation for all parties involved. Basic principles - Possibility of combining effective "push & pull" measures => control option (e.g. reduction of car parking spaces, but optimisation of accessibility to public transport and walking and cycling networks, public transport tickets, mobility information, ... etc.) - Changing mobility behaviour in favour of sustainable forms of transport from the moment the flat is handed over ("upheaval" in personal mobility behaviour when changing the residential location) - Reduction in construction and maintenance costs (underground car parks, public road infrastructure) - Easier realisation of larger construction projects in the inner city area with lower generation of vehicle demand Städtebauliche Verträge in Graz / Urban development contracts in Graz Qualitative urban (neighbourhood) development with added value for all stakeholders: urban development contracts are modern instruments in the development of cities and neighbourhoods. As one of the pioneers in this field, the City of Graz also increasingly favours this form of quality assurance. Urban development contracts are a contractual form of regulation between the City of Graz and landowners, which enables flexible control of urban (sub)development in the interests of the common interests while at the same time relieving the public authorities. The contracts make property-related stipulations in accordance with urban planning requirements (e.g. urban development concept, development concept, framework plan, zoning plan) and the specialist planning requirements in particular infrastructure, development, design and mobility. This is intended to infrastructure, services of general interest, building land quality and settlement development required for the (parts of the) city. | Current energy tariffs disincentivize both individual and collective PV systems – meaning energy communities are not economically feasible, housing associations and public buildings struggle with finding a secure RoI for solar panels, and citizens and local industry lack an incentive to install solar panels on their own | |||||
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition | |||||||||
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition | Reininghaus addresses some relevant key aspects listed in the JPI UE PED Framework Definition such as: - high level of aspiration in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production; - integration of different systems and infrastructures; - inclusion of aspects not only related to energy sector, but also connected with social, economic and environmental sustainability. | The Rymdgatan's Residential Portfolio in Sweden presents a compelling case study for its classification as a PED-related research, given its alignment with sustainable behaviours and overarching PED development principles as follows: Inclusivity and Social Equity: The residential portfolio situated in Rymdgatan caters primarily to a low-income community. By focusing on this demographic, the project addresses critical aspects of social equity within sustainable urban development. Ensuring access to energy-efficient housing and amenities for economically disadvantaged populations not only fosters social cohesion but also mitigates energy poverty, a pressing concern in many urban contexts. Multifamily Residential Building: The inclusion of multifamily residential buildings within the portfolio underscores a commitment to density and efficient land use, both essential components of sustainable urban design. Such developments promote resource optimisation by consolidating housing units, thereby reducing per capita energy consumption and infrastructure demands. Moreover, multifamily dwellings often facilitate community engagement and shared resource management, fostering a culture of sustainability among residents. Low Carbon Retrofitting and Transition: The overarching initiative to transition the entire Jakobsgårdarna district. The included Rymdgatan portfolio, towards low carbon retrofitting, represents a significant example of decarbonization and climate resilience. By integrating energy-efficient technologies and renewable energy solutions into existing infrastructure, the project not only reduces carbon emissions but also serves as a blueprint for revitalising old urban environments sustainably. This holistic approach to retrofitting demonstrates a systemic commitment to environmental stewardship and long-term sustainability. Climate Adaptation and Renewable Energy Integration: Despite Sweden's climatic challenges, including lower solar resources during winter months, the Rymdgatan project leverages its geographical context to optimize renewable energy utilization. Sweden's greater solar resource availability during summer and geothermal potentials complement the design's emphasis on seasonal energy planning, where surplus energy generated during peak periods can be stored or redistributed efficiently. By embracing climate-responsive design strategies, the project demonstrates resilience in the face of climate variability while harnessing renewable energy potential effectively. | Implementation of district level heating system to make heating energy positive and expanding local renewable electricity production. | ExPEDite aims at creating and deploying a novel digital twin, allowing for real-time monitoring, visualization and management of district-level energy flows. Cities consume 65% of the world’s energy supply and are responsible for 70% of the CO² emissions, hence sharing a lot of the responsibility for climate change. We are faced with the challenge of redesigning our existing cities to make them more sustainable, resilient, inclusive and safe. Developing Positive Energy Districts (PEDs), is a breakthrough way to deal with the issue of urban emissions and applying adaptation and mitigation strategies to climate change, while ensuring that these urban areas generate an annual surplus of renewable energy and net zero greenhouse gas emissions. PEDs must address environmental, economic and social issues, providing solutions to energy consumption, production, emissions, transport & mobility and livability. By constantly monitoring and evaluating parameters through existing and/or novel sensor systems (e.g., renewable energy production/supply, transport conditions, air quality, energy demand, meteorological conditions, etc.), unconventional techniques may be applied to provide more sustainable options for the district’s needs. | The large scale provides interesting opportunities for both urban development and strategic energy planning; the diverse mix of buildings and functions also allow for interesting discussions regarding PEDs. Another interesting facet is that the district heating grid is almost fully supplied by waste heat. | ||||
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development | |||||||||
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development | The Reininghausgründe is a new quarter near the centre of the City of Graz. On the area of a former brewery, close to more, still working industries, a new town centre is being established. The quarter will include living areas, workplaces, shops, schools and a park, so that the need for individual mobility is minimized. It is connected to the historical city centre by bike paths, busses and a tram. Car sharing is provided as well. | Borlänge city has committed to become the carbon-neutral city by 2030. | Expected outcome 1 Increased number of (tangible) city planning actions for positive clean energy districts using the (proto-)PED design, development and management digital twin tools (based on pre-market research learnings) using open-standards based components which can be reused elsewhere. 2 Increased integration of existing smaller scale management systems (e.g. Building management systems) with open-standards based operational city platforms using sectorial data (e.g. building data, mobility, urban planning, etc.). 3 Enhanced data gathering approaches with identification of relevant multidimensional data sets (e.g. meteorological, load profile, social, geo-spatial, etc.) high-resolution real-time data streams (e.g. renewable energy production, energy consumption), and relevant forecasting data, drawing also on the work of common European data spaces. 4 Increased number of city planning departments / approaches using common data and (replicable) elements and processes. 5 Consolidated city sensor network specifications, complemented by appropriate data gathering approaches for soft data. 6 Improved performance of AI based self-learning systems for optimization of positive clean energy districts and bottom-up complex models. 7 Enhanced innovation capacity of local/regional administrations and accelerated uptake of shared, smart and sustainable zero emission solutions. | The area has an interesting history of development and has recently undergone several urban improvements. This is coupled with a strong local network of business owners and other stakeholders, all with an interest in developing the area in the best way possible. This made for an interesting case from a planning perspective to investigate how this network would pick up on the concept of PED and whether they could see any potential utility in relation to their everyday experiences. | |||||
B1P003: Environment of the case study area | |||||||||
B2P003: Environment of the case study area | Urban area | Urban area | Suburban area | Urban area | Urban area | Suburban area | |||
B1P004: Type of district | |||||||||
B2P004: Type of district |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
B1P005: Case Study Context | |||||||||
B1P005: Case Study Context |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
B1P006: Year of construction | |||||||||
B1P006: Year of construction | 2025 | 1990 | |||||||
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential | |||||||||
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential | 0 | 100 | 16.931 | ||||||
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential | |||||||||
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential | 10000 | 100 | 14000 | ||||||
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential | |||||||||
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential | 0 | 6 | |||||||
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential | |||||||||
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential | 6 | 10000 | |||||||
B1P011: Population density before intervention | |||||||||
B1P011: Population density before intervention | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
B1P012: Population density after intervention | |||||||||
B1P012: Population density after intervention | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.010658622423328 | 0 | 0 | 0.041379310344828 | 0 | 0 |
B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention | |||||||||
B1P013: Residential | no | no | no | yes | no | no | yes | no | no |
B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²] | 4360 | ||||||||
B1P013: Office | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||
B1P013: Industry and Utility | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||
B1P013: Commercial | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||
B1P013: Institutional | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||
B1P013: Natural areas | no | no | yes | no | yes | no | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||
B1P013: Recreational | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||
B1P013: Dismissed areas | no | no | no | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||
B1P013: Other | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²] | 706 | ||||||||
B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention | |||||||||
B1P014: Residential | no | no | yes | yes | no | no | yes | no | no |
B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²] | 4360 | ||||||||
B1P014: Office | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||
B1P014: Industry and Utility | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||
B1P014: Commercial | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||
B1P014: Institutional | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||
B1P014: Natural areas | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||
B1P014: Recreational | no | no | yes | no | no | no | yes | no | no |
B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||
B1P014: Dismissed areas | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||||||
B1P014: Other | no | no | no | yes | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²] | 706 | ||||||||
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition | |||||||||
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition | Groningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city. | addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation | An ongoing process and dialogue with local stakeholders to determine the future development of the area. | ||||||
B2P002: Installation life time | |||||||||
B2P002: Installation life time | The MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact. | No new installation will be made throughout the project. Rather the project will attempt to establish a local PED network with the aim of empowering the stakeholders to better engage with sustainable technologies. | |||||||
B2P003: Scale of action | |||||||||
B2P003: Scale | District | Virtual | District | ||||||
B2P004: Operator of the installation | |||||||||
B2P004: Operator of the installation | The Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties. | IREC | Kristian Olesen | ||||||
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials | |||||||||
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials | Groningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materials | Replication is primarily focused on the establishment of a local network with an interest in and understanding of PED. | |||||||
B2P006: Circular Economy Approach | |||||||||
B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials? | No | No | No | ||||||
B2P006: Other | |||||||||
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab | |||||||||
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab |
|
|
| ||||||
B2P007: Other | |||||||||
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab | |||||||||
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab | Municipality | Research center/University | Research center/University | ||||||
B2P008: Other | |||||||||
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab | |||||||||
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab |
|
| |||||||
B2P009: Other | research companies, monitoring company, ict company | ||||||||
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities | |||||||||
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities | |||||||||
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab | |||||||||
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab |
|
| |||||||
B2P011: Other | |||||||||
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab | |||||||||
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab |
|
| |||||||
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people | |||||||||
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people | |||||||||
B2P014: Monitoring measures | |||||||||
B2P014: Monitoring measures |
|
| |||||||
B2P015: Key Performance indicators | |||||||||
B2P015: Key Performance indicators |
|
| |||||||
B2P016: Execution of operations | |||||||||
B2P016: Execution of operations | |||||||||
B2P017: Capacities | |||||||||
B2P017: Capacities | - Building simulation model: thermal inertia and thermal loads of a building or community can be co-simulated with a building model. – System Operator and Aggregator simulation models: the interaction with remote control actions carried out by electricity System Operators or flexibility Aggregators can be simulated as well. – Grid simulation model: the physical interaction of the building with the grid power supply can be simulated enabling the experimental validation of flexibility services to the network. | ||||||||
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders | |||||||||
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders | |||||||||
B2P019: Available tools | |||||||||
B2P019: Available tools |
|
| |||||||
B2P019: Available tools | |||||||||
B2P020: External accessibility | |||||||||
B2P020: External accessibility | |||||||||
C1P001: Unlocking Factors | |||||||||
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | |
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | |
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | |
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up) | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | |
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down) | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | |
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.) | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | |
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | |
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES) | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | |
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any) | |||||||||
C1P002: Driving Factors | |||||||||
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency) | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | |
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | |
C1P002: Economic growth need | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.) | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any) | Earthquakes due to gas extraction | ||||||||
C1P003: Administrative barriers | |||||||||
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | |
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P003: Lack of public participation | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | |
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos) | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | |
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any) | |||||||||
C1P004: Policy barriers | |||||||||
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any) | |||||||||
C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers | |||||||||
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P005: Regulatory instability | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P005: Non-effective regulations | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | |
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any) | |||||||||
C1P006: Environmental barriers | |||||||||
C1P006: Environmental barriers | 2 - Slightly important | ||||||||
C1P007: Technical barriers | |||||||||
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P007: Deficient planning | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | |
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | |
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | |
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | |
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any) | |||||||||
C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers | |||||||||
C1P008: Inertia | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P008: Rebound effect | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration | 2 - Slightly important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any) | |||||||||
C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers | |||||||||
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | |
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | |
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any) | |||||||||
C1P010: Financial barriers | |||||||||
C1P010: Hidden costs | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | |
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P010: Economic crisis | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | |
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | |
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives | 2 - Slightly important | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | ||
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any) | |||||||||
C1P011: Market barriers | |||||||||
C1P011: Split incentives | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P011: Energy price distortion | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs) | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any) | |||||||||
C1P012: Stakeholders involved | |||||||||
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
C1P012: Research & Innovation |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
C1P012: Financial/Funding |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
C1P012: Business process management |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
C1P012: Urban Services providers |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
C1P012: Real Estate developers |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
C1P012: Design/Construction companies |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
C1P012: Other |
| ||||||||
C1P012: Other (if any) | |||||||||
Summary |
![](https://pedeu.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/capture-1024x577.png)
Authors (framework concept)
Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)
Contributors (to the content)
Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)
Implemented by
Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)