Search
Close this search box.
Search
Map View
Table View
Projects
Filters:
Clear Filters Export All Entries (CSV)
NameProjectTypeCompare
Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna/16. District HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Estonia V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, the Netherlands (District of Kanaleneiland) V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Portugal V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Uncompare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Uncompare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Uncompare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Uncompare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleGroningen, PED North
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab
«×»
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark
«×»
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district
«×»
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga
«×»
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus
«×»
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo
«×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabGroningen, PED NorthBarcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLabVienna, Am KempelenparkLeipzig, Baumwollspinnerei districtIstanbul, Kadikoy district, CaferagaIstanbul, Ozyegin University CampusSmart Otaniemi, Espoo
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynonoyesyesyesnono
PED relevant case studynononononoyesyes
PED Lab.yesyesnonononoyes
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesnoyesyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusyesnoyesnononono
Energy communityyesyesnonoyesnono
Circularityyesnononononono
Air quality and urban comfortnononoyesnoyesno
Electrificationnoyesnoyesnoyesno
Net-zero energy costnonononononono
Net-zero emissionyesyesnonononono
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)noyesnonononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynonononononono
Othernoyesnoyesnoyesyes
Other (A1P004)Green ITNet-zero emission; Annual energy surplusalmost nZEB districtSocial aspects/affordability; societal development, innovation capabilities, export businesses; new investing possibilities
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabImplementation PhaseIn operationPlanning PhaseImplementation PhasePlanning PhaseImplementation PhaseIn operation
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date12/1801/201107/1601/2010/2401/18
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date12/2302/201302/2512/2210/28
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • GIS open datasets
  • General statistical datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • General statistical datasets
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
  • TNO, Hanze, RUG,
  • Ped noord book
    • Alpagut, B., Lopez Romo, A., Hernández, P., Tabanoğlu, O., & Hermoso Martinez, N. (2021). A GIS-Based Multicriteria Assessment for Identification of Positive Energy Districts Boundary in Cities. Energies, 14(22), 7517.
      A1P011: Geographic coordinates
      X Coordinate (longitude):6.5351212.116.39529212.31845829.0263195268751729.25830024.830265
      Y Coordinate (latitude):53.23484641.348.17359851.32649240.9884139524746141.03060060.183989
      A1P012: Country
      A1P012: CountryNetherlandsSpainAustriaGermanyTurkeyTurkeyFinland
      A1P013: City
      A1P013: CityGroningenBarcelona and TarragonaViennaLeipzigIstanbulIstanbulEspoo
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CfaCsaCwbDfbCsbCfaDfb
      A1P015: District boundary
      A1P015: District boundaryFunctionalVirtualGeographicFunctionalGeographicGeographic
      OtherGeographic
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:MixedPublicPrivateMixedPrivateMixed
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersSingle OwnerSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple Owners
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED70621315
      A1P019: Conditioned space
      A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]1.0117000116052
      A1P020: Total ground area
      A1P020: Total ground area [m²]17.132300001151727285.400
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0001000
      A1P022: Financial schemes
      A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estateyesnonononoyesno
      A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
      A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Otheryesnononononoyes
      A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]39000000
      A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononononono
      A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingyesnononononono
      A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonononononono
      A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingyesnononononono
      A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononono
      A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUyesnononoyesyesno
      A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonononononono
      A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonononononono
      A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononoyes
      A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]27000000
      A1P022: Other
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      • Boosting local businesses,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      • Job creation,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      • Job creation,
      • Positive externalities,
      • Other
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production,
      • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
      A1P023: OtherSustainable and replicable business models regarding renewable energy systemsBoosting new investors to the area, - Increasing the touristic value of area and urban mobility at the area, - Increasing the regional value (housing price, etc.), - Providing economic advantages by switching to positive energy production
      A1P024: More comments:
      A1P024: More comments:Semi-Virtual Energy Integration Laboratory (SEILAB) The Energy Smart Lab is an infrastructure conceived as a flexible and versatile platform for innovative technological developments for both industry and competitive R+D projects. The areas of expertise of this laboratory pivot around the following technologies: – Power Electronics for the integration and control of the elements within a building or community: Renewable Energy Sources (RES), Energy Storage Systems and Electric Vehicles (EV) – ICT Platform for smart communications and energy management of systems, building, networks and communities. – Energy System Integration technologies for smart and flexible buildings and grids including RES and EV. The laboratory operation is based on the hardware emulation approach, which allows for real physical equipment to be operated under a broad range of scenarios without depending on the real occurrence of the boundary conditions suitable for the experimental validation. The laboratory is pioneer in addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation.In addition to having the most energy efficient academic building in Turkey, the university campus also has 3 buildings with LEED NC Campus certificate and LEED BD+C Gold certificate. In addition, it aims to continuously improve the energy efficiency objectives on campus in an innovative way. For this purpose, energy management and storage systems are being installed in the Dormitory 6 building, which is used as the demo area of the LEGOFIT project, for the purpose of turning it into a PED project.
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]1
      Contact person for general enquiries
      A1P026: NameJasper Tonen, Elisabeth KoopsDr. Jaume Salom, Dra. Cristina CorcheroGerhard HoferSimon BaumMr. Dogan UNERICem KeskinChristoph Gollner
      A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of GroningenIRECe7 energy innovation & engineeringCENERO Energy GmbHMunicipality of KadikoyCenter for Energy, Environment and Economy, Ozyegin UniversityFFG
      A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversitySME / IndustryOtherMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityOther
      A1P028: OtherCENERO Energy GmbH
      A1P029: EmailJasper.tonen@groningen.nlJsalom@irec.catgerhard.hofer@e-sieben.atsib@cenero.dedogan.uneri@kadikoy.bel.trcem.keskin@ozyegin.edu.trchristoph.gollner@ffg.at
      Contact person for other special topics
      A1P030: NameSimon BaumMrs. Damla MUHCU YILMAZM. Pınar Mengüç
      A1P031: Emailsib@cenero.dedamla.muhcu@kadikoy.bel.trpinar.menguc@ozyegin.edu.tr
      Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYes
      A2P001: Fields of application
      A2P001: Fields of application
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
      • Waste management
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy production,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
      • Digital technologies,
      • Waste management
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
      • Digital technologies
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies,
      • Waste management,
      • Indoor air quality,
      • Construction materials
      • Digital technologies
      A2P001: Other
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streamsEnergy SmartLab capacities - Building simulation model: thermal inertia and thermal loads of a building or community can be co-simulated with a building model. – System Operator and Aggregator simulation models: the interaction with remote control actions carried out by electricity System Operators or flexibility Aggregators can be simulated as well. – Grid simulation model: the physical interaction of the building with the grid power supply can be simulated enabling the experimental validation of flexibility services to the network. Energy SmartLab systems - SAFT Li-ion battery: maximum stored energy 20000 Wh, rated power 150 kW, rated discharge current 200 A, rated charge current 34 A, operating voltage 189 V – 227 V – 254 V, capacity 82 Ah. – Ultracapacitors: maximum stored energy 57 Wh, rated power 10 kW, rated current 20 A, peak current (<1s) 200 Apk, operating voltage 250 V – 500 V, capacity 1,65 F. – Electric vehicle second life battery: maximum stored energy 23300 Wh, rated power 40 kW, rated current 150 A, operating voltage 240 V – 400 V, capacity 32 Ah - 5 microgrid emulators (emulated power 5.5 kVA, max generation connected 10kVA, max consumption connected 10 kVA) - 1 grid emulator (Rated power: 200 kVA, Rated current per phase: 350 A, Rated current per neutral conductor: 35)LEED NC Campus + LEGOFIT Project Energy Efficiency: Tri- generation, Compliance with ISO 50001, ASHRAE 90.1, energy efficient appliances, HVAC and lighting Energy flexibility: Energy demand management Energy production: Solar PVs Onsite + (to be installed more) E-mobility: EV Charging stations Indoor Air Quality: Energy Management System, Compliance with ASHRAE 62.1, ASHRAE 55 Construction materials: Passive systems, LEED certified buildings, innovative materials such as PCM Waste Management: Zero waste document
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoYesYes
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesNoYes
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesNoNo
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationMobility, till now, is not included in the energy model.– Electric vehicle second life battery: maximum stored energy 23300 Wh, rated power 40 kW, rated current 150 A, operating voltage 240 V – 400 V, capacity 32 AhNot included, the campus is a non car area except emergencies
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]2.31.650.94
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.330.10
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]0
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P011: PVnoyesnoyesyesyesno
      A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.51
      A2P011: Windnonononononono
      A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Hydrononononononono
      A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_elnonononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: PVT_elnonononononono
      A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Othernonononononono
      A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P012: Geothermalyesnononononono
      A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Solar Thermalyesnononoyesnono
      A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.08
      A2P012: Biomass_heatyesnononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.1
      A2P012: Waste heat+HPyesnononononono
      A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: PVT_thyesnononononono
      A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Othernonononononono
      A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesGeothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centersTwo scenarios are conducted regarding Kadikoy PED energy generation. For the second scenario, just 0.53GWh/annum PV production is proposed.
      A2P014: Annual energy use
      A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]2.4210.743.5
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]0.49
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
      A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P017: Gasnoyesnonononono
      A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Coalnonononononono
      A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Oilnonononononono
      A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Othernonononononono
      A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P018: PVnonononoyesyesno
      A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]-0.260.00045547
      A2P018: Windnonononononono
      A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Hydrononononononono
      A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_elnonononononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
      A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Othernonononononono
      A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
      A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
      A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_heatnonononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
      A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
      A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Othernonononononono
      A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary0000-2.269230769230800
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]
      A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
      A2P022: Safety & Security
      A2P022: Health
      A2P022: Education
      A2P022: Mobility
      A2P022: Energyapply
      A2P022: Water
      A2P022: Economic development
      A2P022: Housing and Community
      A2P022: Waste
      A2P022: Other
      A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
      A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesyesnonoyesyesno
      A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsyesnonoyesyesnono
      A2P023: Wind Turbinesnononononoyesno
      A2P023: Geothermal energy systemyesnononononoyes
      A2P023: Waste heat recoveryyesnononononono
      A2P023: Waste to energyyesnononononono
      A2P023: Polygenerationnonononononono
      A2P023: Co-generationnononononoyesno
      A2P023: Heat Pumpyesnonoyesyesyesno
      A2P023: Hydrogennonononononono
      A2P023: Hydropower plantnonononononono
      A2P023: Biomassnonononononono
      A2P023: Biogasnonononononono
      A2P023: Other
      A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
      A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)yesyesnononoyesno
      A2P024: Energy management systemyesyesnononoyesno
      A2P024: Demand-side managementyesnonononoyesno
      A2P024: Smart electricity gridnoyesnonononono
      A2P024: Thermal Storageyesnononononono
      A2P024: Electric Storageyesyesnononoyesno
      A2P024: District Heating and Coolingyesnonononoyesyes
      A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsyesnonononoyesno
      A2P024: P2P – buildingsnonononononono
      A2P024: Other
      A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
      A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnonononononono
      A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsyesnononononono
      A2P025: High-performance new buildingsyesnonononoyesno
      A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)yesnononononono
      A2P025: Urban data platformsyesnononononono
      A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnonononononono
      A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)noyesnononoyesno
      A2P025: Smart irrigationnononononoyesno
      A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonononononono
      A2P025: Smart surveillancenononoyesnoyesno
      A2P025: Other
      A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
      A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)noyesnonononono
      A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)nononoyesnonono
      A2P026: e-Mobilityyesnonoyesnoyesno
      A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnononononoyesno
      A2P026: Car-free areanononononoyesno
      A2P026: Other
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notesTest-Concept for bidirectional charging.
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesNoYes
      A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance Certificate
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoYes
      A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesLEED BD+C, LEED NC CAMPUS
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • New development strategies,
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Smart cities strategies,
      • New development strategies
      • Urban Renewal Strategies,
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Smart cities strategies,
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Smart cities strategies
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
      • Electrification of Cooking Methods,
      • Biogas
      • Biogas
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
      • Electrification of Cooking Methods
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
      • Electrification of Cooking Methods
      A3P003: OtherBoiler Automation, Energy Management System, Electric Battery Storage, Demand Management and Flexible Pricing
      A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
      A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities-Allows for real physical equipment to be operated under a broad range of scenarios without depending on the real occurrence of the boundary conditions suitable for the experimental validation -Pioneer in addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation.Carbon and Energy Neutrality
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviourIn Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed.-Improving the development of Net Zero Energy Buildings and Flexible Energy buildings.Under LEGOFIT project, promoting sustainable behavior for better occupant experience is a targeted aim under a work package.
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      • Innovative business models,
      • Blockchain
      • Demand management Living Lab
      • Innovative business models,
      • Other
      • Innovative business models,
      • PPP models,
      • Circular economy models,
      • Demand management Living Lab,
      • Local trading
      • Innovative business models
      A3P006: Otheroperational savings through efficiency measures
      A3P007: Social models
      A3P007: Social models
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Citizen Social Research,
      • Prevention of energy poverty,
      • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
      • Digital Inclusion,
      • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
      • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
      • Citizen Social Research,
      • Prevention of energy poverty,
      • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
      A3P007: Other
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      • Strategic urban planning,
      • District Energy plans,
      • City Vision 2050,
      • SECAP Updates
      • Strategic urban planning,
      • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
      • District Energy plans,
      • City Vision 2050,
      • SECAP Updates
      • City Vision 2050,
      • SECAP Updates,
      • Building / district Certification
      A3P008: Other
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      • Energy Neutral
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Pollutants Reduction,
      • Greening strategies
      • Other
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Net zero carbon footprint
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Net zero carbon footprint,
      • Greening strategies,
      • Cool Materials
      • Energy Neutral
      A3P009: OtherPositive Energy Balance for the demo site
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsAt national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen:  Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation.  Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries.  The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals.  Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricity- European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (‘Renewable energy’ directive - 2018/2001/EU and ‘Common rules for the internal electricity market’ directive- 2019/944/EU). - Spanish building certification is regulated through Royal Decree 235/2013.ISO 45001, ISO 14001, ISO 50001, Zero Waste Policy
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionThe campus should be considered a PED case study due to its exemplary commitment to sustainability and energy efficiency, as evidenced by several of its buildings achieving LEED certification. This certification underscores the campus's adherence to rigorous environmental standards and its proactive steps towards reducing carbon footprints. Also, the integration of sustainable practices across the campus aligns with the PED framework, which aims to create urban areas that produce more energy than they consume. Therefore, this campus serves as a model of how educational institutions can lead the way in fostering sustainable communities and advancing the goals of PED.
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentThe purpose of implementing the PED project on this sustainable campus, where several buildings have LEED certification, is to further enhance its energy efficiency and environmental stewardship by creating a district that generates more energy than it consumes. The initiator was motivated by the need to address climate change, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and promote renewable energy sources. Additionally, the campus's existing commitment to sustainability and the success of its LEED-certified buildings provided a strong foundation for demonstrating the feasibility and benefits of PED development, serving as a model for sustainable urban living and energy self-sufficiency.
      B1P003: Environment of the case study area
      B2P003: Environment of the case study areaUrban areaUrban areaSuburban areaUrban area
      B1P004: Type of district
      B2P004: Type of district
      • Renovation
      • Renovation
      • Renovation
      • New construction,
      • Renovation
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      • Re-use / Transformation Area,
      • New Development
      • Preservation Area
      • Re-use / Transformation Area,
      • Retrofitting Area
      • Retrofitting Area
      • Re-use / Transformation Area,
      • New Development
      B1P006: Year of construction
      B1P006: Year of construction2024
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential23.379
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential9800
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential9800
      B1P011: Population density before intervention
      B1P011: Population density before intervention00000340
      B1P012: Population density after intervention
      B1P012: Population density after intervention0000034.3377715487040
      B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
      B1P013: Residentialnonononoyesnono
      B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Officenonoyesnoyesnono
      B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
      B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Commercialnonoyesnoyesnono
      B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Institutionalnononononoyesno
      B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]285.400
      B1P013: Natural areasnonononononono
      B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Recreationalnonononononono
      B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Dismissed areasnonononononono
      B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Othernonononoyesnono
      B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]Cultural Center, Sports Center / Total building and land use data of neigborhood 13,878 residential, 4,441 commercial using before intervention. For project area & 49 building area m2
      B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
      B1P014: Residentialnonoyesnoyesnono
      B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Officenonoyesnoyesnono
      B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
      B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Commercialnonoyesnoyesnono
      B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Institutionalnononononoyesno
      B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]280000
      B1P014: Natural areasnonononononono
      B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Recreationalnonononononono
      B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononononono
      B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Othernonononoyesnono
      B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionGroningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city.addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation
      B2P002: Installation life time
      B2P002: Installation life timeThe MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact.
      B2P003: Scale of action
      B2P003: ScaleDistrictVirtualDistrict
      B2P004: Operator of the installation
      B2P004: Operator of the installationThe Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties.IREC
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materialsGroningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materials
      B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
      B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?NoNo
      B2P006: Other
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      • Civic
      • Strategic,
      • Private
      B2P007: Other
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipalityResearch center/University
      B2P008: Other
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      • Academia,
      • Private,
      • Industrial,
      • Other
      • Academia,
      • Private
      B2P009: Otherresearch companies, monitoring company, ict company
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      • Buildings,
      • Demand-side management,
      • Energy storage,
      • Energy networks,
      • Waste management,
      • Lighting,
      • E-mobility,
      • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
      • Social interactions,
      • Business models
      • Demand-side management,
      • Energy storage,
      • Energy networks,
      • Efficiency measures,
      • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)
      B2P011: Other
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      • Tools for prototyping and modelling
      • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
      • Tools for prototyping and modelling,
      • Tools, spaces, events for testing and validation
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      • Execution plan,
      • Available data,
      • Type of measured data,
      • Equipment,
      • Level of access
      • Equipment
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      • Energy,
      • Social,
      • Economical / Financial
      • Energy,
      • Environmental
      B2P016: Execution of operations
      B2P016: Execution of operations
      B2P017: Capacities
      B2P017: Capacities- Building simulation model: thermal inertia and thermal loads of a building or community can be co-simulated with a building model. – System Operator and Aggregator simulation models: the interaction with remote control actions carried out by electricity System Operators or flexibility Aggregators can be simulated as well. – Grid simulation model: the physical interaction of the building with the grid power supply can be simulated enabling the experimental validation of flexibility services to the network.
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P019: Available tools
      • Energy modelling,
      • Social models,
      • Business and financial models
      • Energy modelling
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P020: External accessibility
      B2P020: External accessibility
      C1P001: Unlocking Factors
      C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
      C1P002: Driving Factors
      C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)Earthquakes due to gas extraction
      C1P003: Administrative barriers
      C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
      C1P004: Policy barriers
      C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
      C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
      C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Non-effective regulations3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
      C1P006: Environmental barriers
      C1P006: Environmental barriersAir Quality Management Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Energy Efficiency Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Water Conservation Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Waste Management Importance Level: 4 (Important) Material Selection Importance Level: 4 (Important) Renewable Energy Integration Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Heat Island Effect Mitigation Importance Level: 4 (Important) Noise Pollution Control Importance Level: 3 (Moderately Important)
      C1P007: Technical barriers
      C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Deficient planning2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Lack of well-defined process3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
      C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
      C1P008: Inertia2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Rebound effect2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
      C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
      C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
      C1P010: Financial barriers
      C1P010: Hidden costs2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Risk and uncertainty3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
      C1P011: Market barriers
      C1P011: Split incentives5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Energy price distortion4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
      C1P012: Stakeholders involved
      C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Research & Innovation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Financial/Funding
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Business process management
      • Planning/leading
      • None
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Urban Services providers
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Real Estate developers
      • Construction/implementation
      • None
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Design/Construction companies
      • Construction/implementation
      • Construction/implementation
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
      • None
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Other
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Other (if any)
      Summary

      Authors (framework concept)

      Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

      Contributors (to the content)

      Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

      Implemented by

      Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
      Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

      Join the Action

      PED-EU-NET is an open, interdisciplinary and growing network welcoming academics, practitioners and relevant stakeholders to contribute to the activities of the work plan.
      Join Now

      COST

      COST is an EU funding programme that enables researchers to set up their interdisciplinary research networks in Europe and beyond. We provide funds for organising conferences, meetings, training schools, short scientific exchanges or other networking activities in a wide range of scientific topics. By creating open spaces where people and ideas can grow, we unlock the full potential of science.

      PED-EU-NET

      The COST Action Positive Energy Districts European Network (PED-EU-NET) aims to mobilise researchers and other relevant stakeholders across different domains and sectors to drive the deployment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Europe through open sharing of knowledge, exchange of ideas, pooling of resources, experimentation of new methods and co-creation of novel solutions.

      Action Details

      Grant Holder
      Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome

      Start of Action: 10 September 2020
      End of Action: 09 September 2024
      CSO approval date: 24/03/2020

      © 2021-2023 PED-EU-NET COST Action CA19126. All rights reserved.