Search
Close this search box.
Search
Map View
Table View
Projects
Filters:
Clear Filters Export All Entries (CSV)
NameProjectTypeCompare
Örebro-Vivalla JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Texel JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hällefors, Sweden JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Uncompare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lecce, SmartEnCity SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Firenze, Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Uncompare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Uncompare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
TitleSalzburg, Gneis district
Åland, Smart Energy Åland
«×»
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka
«×»
Kifissia, Energy community
«×»
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district
«×»
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio
«×»
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab
«×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabSalzburg, Gneis districtÅland, Smart Energy ÅlandIzmir, District of KarşıyakaKifissia, Energy communityBologna, Pilastro-Roveri districtBorlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential PortfolioBucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studyyesyesyesnononono
PED relevant case studynononoyesyesyesno
PED Lab.nonononononoyes
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesyesnoyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusyesnoyesnonoyesno
Energy communityyesnonoyesyesyesno
Circularitynonononononono
Air quality and urban comfortyesnoyesyesnonono
Electrificationnononoyesnoyesno
Net-zero energy costnonoyesnononono
Net-zero emissionnonononononono
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)noyesnonononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynonoyesnonoyesno
Othernoyesnonononoyes
Other (A1P004)Energy efficient; Carbon free; Sustainable neighbourhoodSmart Buildings
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabCompletedIn operationPlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date01/2001/1410/2209/1903/25
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date01/2410/2510/2312/27
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards
A1P009: OtherOther
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
    • Boeri, A., Boulanger, S., Turci, G., Pagliula, S. (2021) Strategie e tecnologie abilitanti per PED misti: efficienza tra smart cities e industria 4.0. TECHNE, 22, 180-190,
    • Barroco Fontes Cunha F., Carani C., Nucci C.A., Castro C., Santana Silva M., Andrade Torres E. (2021) Transitioning to a low carbon society through energy communities: Lessons learned from Brazil and Italy, ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2021, 75, 1-19.,
    • GRETA Project, Pilastro-Roveri case study. Available at: https://projectgreta.eu/case-study/renewable-energy-district/
        A1P011: Geographic coordinates
        X Coordinate (longitude):13.04121619.943863827.11004923.81458811.39732315.39449526.09739432591498
        Y Coordinate (latitude):47.77101960.216621838.49605438.07734944.50710660.48660944.44724967519929
        A1P012: Country
        A1P012: CountryAustriaFinlandTurkeyGreeceItalySwedenRomania
        A1P013: City
        A1P013: CitySalzburgÅlandİzmirMunicipality of KifissiaBolognaBorlängeBucharest
        A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
        A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).DfbDfbCsaCsaCfaDsbCsa
        A1P015: District boundary
        A1P015: District boundaryGeographicFunctionalGeographicVirtualGeographicGeographicGeographic
        OtherThe energy will be produced by a PV plant installed on the terrace of a municipal building. Members of the energy community (that is under formation) will benefit from the energy produced via virtual net metering. PV instalment and the buildings (owned by the members of the community) will be within the boundaries of the Municipality but not necessary in the same area/district/neighbourhood
        A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
        A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:MixedMixedPrivateMixedMixedPublic
        A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
        A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Single OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerSingle Owner
        A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
        A1P018: Number of buildings in PED1721196210
        A1P019: Conditioned space
        A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]1997621027953700
        A1P020: Total ground area
        A1P020: Total ground area [m²]3260078000009945485
        A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
        A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0030000
        A1P022: Financial schemes
        A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estatenonononononono
        A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
        A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernonononononono
        A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnoyesnonononono
        A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnoyesnonoyesnono
        A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonononoyesnono
        A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnoyesnonoyesnono
        A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononoyes
        A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUyesnoyesnoyesnono
        A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]1193355
        A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonoyesnononono
        A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonononoyesnono
        A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononono
        A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022: Other
        A1P023: Economic Targets
        A1P023: Economic Targets
        • Positive externalities,
        • Other
        • Job creation,
        • Other
        • Positive externalities,
        • Boosting local and sustainable production
        • Job creation,
        • Positive externalities,
        • Boosting local businesses
        • Positive externalities,
        • Boosting local businesses,
        • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
        A1P023: OtherBoosting social cooperation and social aidTourism development
        A1P024: More comments:
        A1P024: More comments:The Pilastro-Roveri area is a large peri-urban district in the northeast of the city of Bologna (about 650 hectares). In particular, the northern area is mainly characterised by the residential sector of Rione Pilastro, a significant complex of social housing built in the 1960s in response to the housing emergency due to migrations from southern Italy and nowadays satisfying more global migrations. The southern area is instead characterised by the presence of the production district called Roveri. The area appears relevant for the research as it has several evolution potentials towards a climate-neutral district. In particular some key factors are interesting: - the presence of one of the largest photovoltaic parks in Europe on the roofs of CAAB, characterised by a production of 11,350,000 Kw/h of primary energy; - the presence of companies attentive to the issues of climate change and energy, able to act as facilitators for the area. This is the case of FIVE, a leader in the production of electric bicycles, whose plant is the first nZEB (nearly Zero Energy Building) productive building in the city; - the high presence of industrial buildings of different sizes needing a reduction in energy consumption; - the presence of obsolete, sometimes in decay, and of general highly energy-intensive buildings in the Pilastro area, accompanied by spread phenomena of energy poverty; - the presence of spaces that could be converted (e.g. unused warehouses, unexploited green areas, etc.); - the presence of an active community, characterised by numerous associations, but also by social challenges linked to multiple vulnerabilities; - the presence of local actors interested in the development of the area (including the Municipality, the University, Confindustria, ENEA, Confartigianato, etc.). Two main research projects are actually ongoing in the area, applying solutions towards energy improvement and transition strategies to guide the area towards climate neutrality: - GECO - Green Energy Community, funded by EIT Climate-KIC and active since 2019, aims to trigger a virtuous path of energy sharing between companies and citizens through the creation of an energy community. - GRETA - Green Energy Transition Actions, funded by the H2020 programme, aims to understand drivers and barriers on the involvement of citizens in the energy transition processes, by formulating Community Transition Pathways and Energy Citizenship Contracts. [from: Boeri, A., Boulanger, S., Turci, G., Pagliula, S. (2021) Strategie e tecnologie abilitanti per PED misti: efficienza tra smart cities e industria 4.0. TECHNE, 22, 180-190]
        A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
        A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]
        Contact person for general enquiries
        A1P026: NameAbel MagyariChristoph GollnerOzlem SenyolArtemis Giavasoglou, Kleopatra KalampokaProf. Danila LongoJingchun ShenAdela Bara
        A1P027: OrganizationABUDFFGKarsiyaka MunicipalityMunicipality of Kifissia – SPARCS local teamUniversity of Bologna - Architecture DepartmentHögskolan DalarnaThe Bucharest University of Economic Studies
        A1P028: AffiliationResearch Center / UniversityOtherMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / University
        A1P028: Other
        A1P029: Emailmagyari.abel@abud.huchristoph.gollner@ffg.atozlemkocaer2@gmail.comgiavasoglou@kifissia.grjih@du.seBara.adela@ie.ase.ro
        Contact person for other special topics
        A1P030: NameStrassl IngeborgHasan Burak CavkaStavros Zapantis - vice mayorXingxing Zhang
        A1P031: Emailinge.strassl@salzburg.gv.athasancavka@iyte.edu.trstavros.zapantis@gmail.comxza@du.se
        Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYes
        A2P001: Fields of application
        A2P001: Fields of application
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production,
        • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.)
        • Energy production
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production,
        • E-mobility,
        • Digital technologies,
        • Waste management
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production,
        • E-mobility,
        • Construction materials
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Digital technologies,
        • Indoor air quality
        A2P001: Other
        A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
        A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields- Dynamic district, and building scale energy modelling - Microclimate modelling - Klimaaktiv certification system - Energy community - Flexibility with shared heating and electricity systemsMethods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4). In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED.Energy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax incentives (110%, façade bonus, eco-bonus, sismabonus, renovation bonus, etc.); - several activities - such as Workshops, Webinars, Roundtables, Urban Trekking, etc…- are encouraged in the area to deepen knowledge and raise awareness on energy issues among urban stakeholders (householders, occupants, workers, etc..); - reduction in energy consumption also through every day energy saving actions. The spread of energy poverty phenomena in the area is considered urgent both for the medium-low-income population living in Pilastro and for small and medium-sized enterprises placed in Roveri; - Project for a One-stop-shop to guide residents and enterprises towards more conscious energy behaviours (planned in Bologna SECAP). Energy production: - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a waste to energy plant connected to the district heating system; - presence of a large PV plant in the CAAB area - 11,350,000 Kw/h Energy flexibility: - testing energy community and collective self-consumption feasibility in Pilastro area through an active citizens involvement process; - testing energy community feasibility among SMEs in Roveri industrial area; - testing the potential of complementary energy consumption profiles between residential area (Pilastro) and industrial area (Roveri). Digital technologies: - smart-meters installation in some dwellings in order to monitor consumption and suggest more sustainable energy behaviors; - Blog Pilastro as a tool to inform about the main activities and events ongoing in the area; E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; - e-bike/bikesharing services recovery (in fact during Covid-19 in the area Mobike service was suspended) and implementation. Urban comfort and air quality - Control units for air pollutants concentration (PM2.5, PM10, NO2); - Microclimatic simulationLoad calculation and system optimisation: City Energy Analyst Identification of stranded assets for asset owners and investors to understand the carbon risks: CRREM
        A2P003: Application of ISO52000
        A2P003: Application of ISO52000YesYesYesNo
        A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
        A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesNoYes
        A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
        A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNoNo
        A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
        A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationMobility is not included in the calculations.
        A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
        A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]3.8620.6777
        A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
        A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]1.2260.03656
        A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
        A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]0
        A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
        A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]0
        A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
        A2P011: PVyesyesyesyesyesnono
        A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.77706641.028
        A2P011: Windnoyesnonononono
        A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Hydrononononononono
        A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Biomass_elnonononononono
        A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
        A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: PVT_elnononononoyesno
        A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.01818
        A2P011: Othernonononononono
        A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
        A2P012: Geothermalyesnononononono
        A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Solar Thermalnoyesnonoyesnono
        A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Biomass_heatnonononoyesnono
        A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
        A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
        A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: PVT_thnononononoyesno
        A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.0825
        A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
        A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Othernonononononono
        A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
        A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
        A2P014: Annual energy use
        A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]0.8190165.0880.318
        A2P015: Annual energy delivered
        A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]0.2055
        A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
        A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]-10
        A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
        A2P017: Gasnonoyesnononono
        A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
        A2P017: Coalnonononononono
        A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
        A2P017: Oilnonononononono
        A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
        A2P017: Othernononononoyesno
        A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
        A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
        A2P018: PVnonoyesnononono
        A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.707
        A2P018: Windnonononononono
        A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Hydrononononononono
        A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Biomass_elnonononononono
        A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
        A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
        A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Othernononononoyesno
        A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.187
        A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
        A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
        A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
        A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Biomass_heatnonononononono
        A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
        A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
        A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
        A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
        A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Othernononononoyesno
        A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0
        A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
        A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary001.4540311173975000.538395721925130
        A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
        A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]6.93
        A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
        A2P022: Safety & Securitynone
        A2P022: HealthCO2) levels, Predicted Mean Vote,Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied, Temperature, Relative Humidity, Illuminance, Daylight factor, Sound pressure levelsthermal comfort diagram
        A2P022: Educationnone
        A2P022: Mobilitynone
        A2P022: EnergyNon-renewable primary energy balance, Renewable energy ratio, Grid Purchase factor, Load cover factor/Self-generation, Supply cover factor/Self-consumption, Net energy/Net power, Peak delivered/exported power, Connection capacity credit, Total greenhouse gas emissionsnormalized CO2/GHG & Energy intensityYes
        A2P022: Water
        A2P022: Economic developmentInvestment costs, Share of investments covered by grants, Maintenance-related costs, Requirement-related costs, Operation-related costs, Other costs, Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return, Economic Value Added, Payback Period, nZEB Cost Comparisoncost of excess emissions
        A2P022: Housing and CommunityAccess to services, Affordability of energy, Affordability of housing, Democratic legitimacy, Living conditions, Social cohesion, Personal safety, Energy consciousness
        A2P022: Waste
        A2P022: Other
        A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
        A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesyesyesnoyesyesno
        A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnoyesnonoyesyesno
        A2P023: Wind Turbinesnoyesnonononono
        A2P023: Geothermal energy systemyesyesnonoyesyesno
        A2P023: Waste heat recoverynononononoyesno
        A2P023: Waste to energynonononoyesnono
        A2P023: Polygenerationnonononononono
        A2P023: Co-generationnonononoyesnono
        A2P023: Heat Pumpnonoyesnoyesyesno
        A2P023: Hydrogennonononononono
        A2P023: Hydropower plantnonononononono
        A2P023: Biomassnonononononono
        A2P023: Biogasnonononononono
        A2P023: OtherWavePhotovoltaics are considered for the next years
        A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
        A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)noyesnonoyesyesyes
        A2P024: Energy management systemyesnononononoyes
        A2P024: Demand-side managementyesnononononoyes
        A2P024: Smart electricity gridyesyesnonononono
        A2P024: Thermal Storagenononononoyesno
        A2P024: Electric Storagenoyesnonoyesnono
        A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnonononoyesyesno
        A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnonononononono
        A2P024: P2P – buildingsyesnononononono
        A2P024: Other
        A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
        A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnonoyesnoyesyesyes
        A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnonononononoyes
        A2P025: High-performance new buildingsyesnononoyesnono
        A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)nonononoyesnono
        A2P025: Urban data platformsnonononononono
        A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnonononoyesnono
        A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)yesnoyesnoyesyesyes
        A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononononono
        A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonononoyesnono
        A2P025: Smart surveillancenonononoyesnoyes
        A2P025: Other
        A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
        A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)noyesnonoyesnono
        A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)yesnononoyesnono
        A2P026: e-Mobilityyesyesnonoyesnono
        A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnonononoyesnono
        A2P026: Car-free areanonononononono
        A2P026: Other
        A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
        A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notesShared mobility: a mobility point will be implemented and ensure the flexible use of different mobility services.
        A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
        A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesNoYesNo
        A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance CertificateEnergy Performance Certificate - in Greece it is mandatory in order to buy or rent a house or a dwellingEnergy Performance Certificate for each dwelling
        A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
        A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesYesNoNoNo
        A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesKlimaaktiv certificate, Greenpass certificate
        A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
        A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
        • Smart cities strategies,
        • New development strategies,
        • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
        • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
        • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
        • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
        • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
        • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC)
        • Urban Renewal Strategies,
        • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
        • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
        • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
        • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
        • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
        • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
        A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
        A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyKarşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030. System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023.City level targets Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (PUMS) - 2019 | Targets: - by 2030 440,000 daily trips will no longer be made by car but on foot, by bike or by public transport; - by 2030 12% of vehicles will be electric; Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP) - 2021 | Targets: - by 2025 deep renovation of 3% per year of residential homes (insulation of building envelopes and adoption of heat pump heating system); - by 2030 reduction of electricity consumption at least of 20% compared to 2018; - by 2030 100% coverage of electricity consumption for municipal buildings; - by 2030 increase public green areas by at least 10% Urban General Plan (PUG) - 2021 | Targets: - by 2030 net zero land consumption; National level targets Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan - 2020 | Targets: - by 2030 reduction of 43% for primary energy consumption, with respect to the reference 2007 scenario. - by 2030 increase of 30% of energy production from renewable sources; - by 2025 energy generation for electricity independent from the use of coal;The study aligns closely with the decarbonisation and energy reduction pathways of residential multi family buildings with 1.5°C global warming target in Sweden. This study will also contribute to the achievement of the carbon neturality of whole Borlänge city by 2030.
        A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
        A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
        • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
        • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
        • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
        • Electrification of Cooking Methods
        A3P003: Other
        A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
        A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesAccording to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario.Bologna needs to reach the climate neutrality proceeding by ‘part’ of the city. Pilastro-Roveri is a promising district due to the following reasons: - some buildings need to be renovated both to increase the energy performance, the seismic behaviour, spaces liveability and comfort; - Pilastro is a residential area with the presence of a high percentage of vulnerable inhabitants affected by energy poverty phenomenon. This situation needs to be prioritized; - Pilastro is characterized by the presence of large underused green spaces that can represent a valuable resource for social cohesion and for heat island phenomenon mitigation; - Roveri is an industrial area where some small-medium enterprises are investing in order to improve their facilities and to efficiency their production cycle; - Roveri and Pilastro areas present complementary energy consumption curves throughout the day/week with a high potential for energy sharing and flexibility.In our project, we carried out a comprehensive exploration of strategies to achieve positive energy districts in a Swedish residential portfolio. The focus on urban energy transitions necessitates a holistic approach that integrates building retrofit, solar technology exploration, and heating supply optimisation. Exploration of Local Solar Sources: The analysis reveals varying solar irradiance resources throughout the year, emphasizing the importance of strategic placement. Integration of combined photovoltaic and thermal panels into building envelopes demonstrates the potential to cover a significant portion of the energy demand even in Sweden. Heating Supply Optimisation with Solar Technologies: Despite the surplus energy production from on-site solar technology, challenges arise due to temporal energy asymmetry. The introduction of heat pumps emerges as a feasible solution to balance energy gaps, utilising both rejected and free heat. Optimisation scenarios, utilising a combination of geothermal heat pumps, water source heat pumps, and PVT, showcase remarkable reductions in emissions and primary energy consumption. Urban Form and Energy Infrastructure Design: We realised the importance of returning to urban form and energy infrastructure design to optimise future residential portfolio potential. Building layout design, influenced by zoning regulations and innovative typologies, plays a crucial role in achieving district level energy efficiency. Future challenges, including demographic shifts, e-mobility, and climate change, necessitate a more holistic approach to energy infrastructure design, addressing not only heating and electricity demands but also cooling requirements.
        A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
        A3P005: Sustainable behaviourBologna SECAP, as well as the participation to the 100 Climate-Neutral Cities, promotes the PED model as an enabling tool to foster city energy transition process. In Pilastro-Roveri district two main sustainable behaviours approaches can be identified: - bottom-up approach - some citizens are joining forces to create groups of energy self-consumption, in view of energy communities’ implementation and, at the same time, some companies have already undertaken some efficiency intervention on the production system by leveraging highly energy-efficient technologies; - top-down approach - GECO and GRETA are international ongoing projects on the area that promote innovation and energy transition with important fundings from the European Union, but with a particular focus on citizen engagement and participatory approach. Simultaneously, new and updated planning tools such as PUG, SECAP and SUMP identify in this part of Bologna city a key area to enable an ecological transition process holding together all relevant stakeholders - citizens, small-medium enterprises and Institutions. These two thrusts (bottom-up and top-down) need to be optimized in view of a participatory pathway towards the grounding of a Positive Energy District in Pilastro-Roveri.While our investigation primarily centres on technical optimisation within Positive Energy District (PED) development, it is essential to acknowledge the broader scope encompassing social and governance dimensions. Specifically, understanding stakeholders' willingness to embrace technical recommendations upon project completion is important. Several potential influencing factors merit exploration, including economic considerations, technical optimisation-associated embodied carbon balance, the general public's technical perceptions, and operational feasibility. Evaluating these aspects holistically not only enhances the efficacy of PED initiatives but also fosters greater acceptance and participation within the communities they serve.
        A3P006: Economic strategies
        A3P006: Economic strategies
        • Innovative business models,
        • Local trading
        • Existing incentives
        • Innovative business models,
        • PPP models,
        • Circular economy models,
        • Demand management Living Lab,
        • Existing incentives
        • Open data business models,
        • Life Cycle Cost,
        • Circular economy models,
        • Local trading
        • Innovative business models,
        • Demand management Living Lab
        A3P006: Other
        A3P007: Social models
        A3P007: Social models
        • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
        • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
        • Social incentives,
        • Quality of Life,
        • Strategies towards social mix,
        • Affordability,
        • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
        • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
        • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
        • Affordability
        • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
        • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
        • Citizen Social Research,
        • Policy Forums,
        • Affordability,
        • Prevention of energy poverty,
        • Digital Inclusion,
        • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
        • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
        • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
        • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
        • Social incentives,
        • Affordability,
        • Digital Inclusion
        • Digital Inclusion,
        • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
        • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
        A3P007: Other
        A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
        A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
        • Building / district Certification
        • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
        • District Energy plans,
        • SECAP Updates
        • Strategic urban planning,
        • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
        • City Vision 2050,
        • SECAP Updates,
        • Building / district Certification
        • Strategic urban planning,
        • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
        • District Energy plans,
        • Building / district Certification
        • Digital twinning and visual 3D models
        A3P008: Other
        A3P009: Environmental strategies
        A3P009: Environmental strategies
        • Energy Neutral,
        • Low Emission Zone
        • Energy Neutral,
        • Carbon-free
        • Energy Neutral,
        • Low Emission Zone,
        • Pollutants Reduction
        • Energy Neutral,
        • Low Emission Zone,
        • Net zero carbon footprint,
        • Life Cycle approach,
        • Pollutants Reduction,
        • Greening strategies
        • Low Emission Zone,
        • Net zero carbon footprint,
        • Life Cycle approach,
        • Sustainable Urban drainage systems (SUDS)
        A3P009: Other
        A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
        A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsPEDs in Italy are meant as strategies towards climate-neutrality: at national/regional/local level a specific legislation on PEDs development is not yet available. However, the European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (‘Renewable energy’ directive - 2018/2001/EU and ‘Common rules for the internal electricity market’ directive- 2019/944/EU). Italy, starting from 2020, has transposed the Directives at national level (‘Milleproroghe’ decree then made effective by ‘Promotion of Renewable sources’ decree 199/2021). At regional level Emilia Romagna in May 2022 developed a law encouraging EC model diffusion (LR 5/2022 ‘Promotion and support of renewable energy communities and renewable energy self-consumers acting collectively’). Energy Community, according to Lindholm et al. 2021, can be considered as ‘a first implementation step towards PEDs.’
        B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
        B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionThe pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED).Pilastro-Roveri district can be considered as a PED-relevant area. Even though at the moment the area doesn’t meet annual energy positive balance, it addresses some relevant key aspects listed in the JPI UE PED Framework Definition such as: - high level of aspiration in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production; - integration of different systems and infrastructures; - inclusion of aspects not only related to energy sector, but also connected with social, economic and environmental sustainability.The Rymdgatan's Residential Portfolio in Sweden presents a compelling case study for its classification as a PED-related research, given its alignment with sustainable behaviours and overarching PED development principles as follows: Inclusivity and Social Equity: The residential portfolio situated in Rymdgatan caters primarily to a low-income community. By focusing on this demographic, the project addresses critical aspects of social equity within sustainable urban development. Ensuring access to energy-efficient housing and amenities for economically disadvantaged populations not only fosters social cohesion but also mitigates energy poverty, a pressing concern in many urban contexts. Multifamily Residential Building: The inclusion of multifamily residential buildings within the portfolio underscores a commitment to density and efficient land use, both essential components of sustainable urban design. Such developments promote resource optimisation by consolidating housing units, thereby reducing per capita energy consumption and infrastructure demands. Moreover, multifamily dwellings often facilitate community engagement and shared resource management, fostering a culture of sustainability among residents. Low Carbon Retrofitting and Transition: The overarching initiative to transition the entire Jakobsgårdarna district. The included Rymdgatan portfolio, towards low carbon retrofitting, represents a significant example of decarbonization and climate resilience. By integrating energy-efficient technologies and renewable energy solutions into existing infrastructure, the project not only reduces carbon emissions but also serves as a blueprint for revitalising old urban environments sustainably. This holistic approach to retrofitting demonstrates a systemic commitment to environmental stewardship and long-term sustainability. Climate Adaptation and Renewable Energy Integration: Despite Sweden's climatic challenges, including lower solar resources during winter months, the Rymdgatan project leverages its geographical context to optimize renewable energy utilization. Sweden's greater solar resource availability during summer and geothermal potentials complement the design's emphasis on seasonal energy planning, where surplus energy generated during peak periods can be stored or redistributed efficiently. By embracing climate-responsive design strategies, the project demonstrates resilience in the face of climate variability while harnessing renewable energy potential effectively.
        B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
        B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentPilastro-Roveri district is not actually meant to become a PEDs. However, it can be considered as a PED-relevant case-study since a participatory transition pathway towards a more sustainable, efficient and resilient district is gaining ground, involving the main urban stakeholders. At the same time, the most recent city plan and policies (such as the city SECAPs - updated in 2021) are promoting PED model as a key strategy to guide Bologna towards climate neutrality by 2030.Borlänge city has committed to become the carbon-neutral city by 2030.
        B1P003: Environment of the case study area
        B2P003: Environment of the case study areaSuburban areaSuburban areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban area
        B1P004: Type of district
        B2P004: Type of district
        • New construction
        • New construction,
        • Renovation
        • Renovation
        • Renovation
        • Renovation
        B1P005: Case Study Context
        B1P005: Case Study Context
        • New Development
        • Retrofitting Area
        • Retrofitting Area
        • Retrofitting Area
        • Re-use / Transformation Area,
        • Retrofitting Area
        B1P006: Year of construction
        B1P006: Year of construction202420051990
        B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
        B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential100
        B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
        B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential100
        B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
        B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential6
        B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
        B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential6
        B1P011: Population density before intervention
        B1P011: Population density before intervention000000
        B1P012: Population density after intervention
        B1P012: Population density after intervention000000.010658622423328
        B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
        B1P013: Residentialnoyesyesnoyesyesno
        B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]1027954360
        B1P013: Officenonononoyesnono
        B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Industry and Utilitynoyesnonoyesnono
        B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Commercialnoyesnonoyesnono
        B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Institutionalnonononoyesnono
        B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Natural areasyesyesnonoyesnono
        B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Recreationalnonononoyesnono
        B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Dismissed areasnonononoyesnono
        B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Othernononononoyesno
        B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]706
        B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
        B1P014: Residentialyesyesyesnoyesyesno
        B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]1027954360
        B1P014: Officenonononoyesnono
        B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Industry and Utilitynoyesnonoyesnono
        B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Commercialnoyesnonoyesnono
        B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Institutionalnonononoyesnono
        B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Natural areasyesyesnonoyesnono
        B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Recreationalnonononoyesnono
        B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononoyesnono
        B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Othernononononoyesno
        B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]706
        B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
        B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
        B2P002: Installation life time
        B2P002: Installation life time
        B2P003: Scale of action
        B2P003: ScaleCity
        B2P004: Operator of the installation
        B2P004: Operator of the installation
        B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
        B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
        B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
        B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?
        B2P006: Other
        B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
        B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
        B2P007: Other
        B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
        B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
        B2P008: Other
        B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
        B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
        B2P009: Other
        B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
        B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
        B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
        B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
        B2P011: Other
        B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
        B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
        B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
        B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
        B2P014: Monitoring measures
        B2P014: Monitoring measures
        B2P015: Key Performance indicators
        B2P015: Key Performance indicators
        B2P016: Execution of operations
        B2P016: Execution of operations
        B2P017: Capacities
        B2P017: Capacities
        B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
        B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
        B2P019: Available tools
        B2P019: Available tools
        B2P019: Available tools
        B2P020: External accessibility
        B2P020: External accessibility
        C1P001: Unlocking Factors
        C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important
        C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
        C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
        C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important
        C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
        C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important
        C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important
        C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important
        C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important
        C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
        C1P002: Driving Factors
        C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
        C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
        C1P002: Economic growth need1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important
        C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
        C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
        C1P003: Administrative barriers
        C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important
        C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important2 - Slightly important
        C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
        C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important
        C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important
        C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important
        C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
        C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
        C1P004: Policy barriers
        C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
        C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
        C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
        C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important
        C1P005: Regulatory instability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important
        C1P005: Non-effective regulations1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important
        C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important2 - Slightly important
        C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important
        C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
        C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important
        C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important2 - Slightly important
        C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
        C1P006: Environmental barriers
        C1P006: Environmental barriers- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 - Water Scarcity: 12 - Slightly important
        C1P007: Technical barriers
        C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important
        C1P007: Deficient planning1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important
        C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important
        C1P007: Lack of well-defined process1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important
        C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important
        C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
        C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
        C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important
        C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
        C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
        C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
        C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
        C1P008: Inertia1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
        C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important
        C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
        C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
        C1P008: Rebound effect1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important
        C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
        C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
        C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
        C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
        C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
        C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
        C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
        C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
        C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
        C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
        C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
        C1P010: Financial barriers
        C1P010: Hidden costs1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
        C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
        C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P010: Risk and uncertainty1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
        C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
        C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
        C1P011: Market barriers
        C1P011: Split incentives1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
        C1P011: Energy price distortion1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
        C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
        C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
        C1P012: Stakeholders involved
        C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
        • Planning/leading
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Research & Innovation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • Planning/leading
        C1P012: Financial/Funding
        • Planning/leading,
        • Construction/implementation
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        • None
        C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • None
        C1P012: Business process management
        • None
        • None
        C1P012: Urban Services providers
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • None
        C1P012: Real Estate developers
        • None
        • Design/demand aggregation
        C1P012: Design/Construction companies
        • Construction/implementation
        • None
        C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • None
        C1P012: Other
        C1P012: Other (if any)
        Summary

        Authors (framework concept)

        Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

        Contributors (to the content)

        Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

        Implemented by

        Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
        Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

        Join the Action

        PED-EU-NET is an open, interdisciplinary and growing network welcoming academics, practitioners and relevant stakeholders to contribute to the activities of the work plan.
        Join Now

        COST

        COST is an EU funding programme that enables researchers to set up their interdisciplinary research networks in Europe and beyond. We provide funds for organising conferences, meetings, training schools, short scientific exchanges or other networking activities in a wide range of scientific topics. By creating open spaces where people and ideas can grow, we unlock the full potential of science.

        PED-EU-NET

        The COST Action Positive Energy Districts European Network (PED-EU-NET) aims to mobilise researchers and other relevant stakeholders across different domains and sectors to drive the deployment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Europe through open sharing of knowledge, exchange of ideas, pooling of resources, experimentation of new methods and co-creation of novel solutions.

        Action Details

        Grant Holder
        Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome

        Start of Action: 10 September 2020
        End of Action: 09 September 2024
        CSO approval date: 24/03/2020

        © 2021-2023 PED-EU-NET COST Action CA19126. All rights reserved.