Filters:
NameProjectTypeCompare
Örebro-Vivalla JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Texel JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hällefors, Sweden JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Uncompare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleSalzburg, Gneis district
Aalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, Denmark
Kaiserslautern, EnStadt:Pfaff
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabSalzburg, Gneis districtAalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, DenmarkKaiserslautern, EnStadt:PfaffNTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studyyesnonoyes
PED relevant case studynoyesyesno
PED Lab.noyesyesno
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusyesnonono
Energy communityyesnonono
Circularitynononono
Air quality and urban comfortyesnonono
Electrificationnononono
Net-zero energy costnononono
Net-zero emissionnononoyes
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynoyesnono
Othernononoyes
Other (A1P004)Energy neutral; Energy efficient; Sustainable neighbourhood
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabCompletedPlanning PhaseIn operationIn operation
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date01/2011/2210/1701/16
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date01/2411/25
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • GIS open datasets
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
A1P011: Geographic coordinates
X Coordinate (longitude):13.04121610.0077.75168410.396472
Y Coordinate (latitude):47.77101957.04102849.43606263.422280
A1P012: Country
A1P012: CountryAustriaDenmarkGermanyNorway
A1P013: City
A1P013: CitySalzburgAalborgKaiserslauternTrondheim
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).DfbDfbCfbDfb
A1P015: District boundary
A1P015: District boundaryGeographicVirtual
Other
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:MixedPublicPublicMixed
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Single OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple Owners
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED17
A1P019: Conditioned space
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]199762
A1P020: Total ground area
A1P020: Total ground area [m²]31308000136.000
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0000
A1P022: Financial schemes
A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estatenononono
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenononono
A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernononono
A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnononono
A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnononono
A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonoyesno
A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnonoyesno
A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernononono
A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUyesnonono
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnoyesnono
A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnononono
A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonoyesno
A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022: Other
A1P023: Economic Targets
A1P023: Economic Targets
  • Positive externalities,
  • Other
  • Positive externalities,
  • Boosting local businesses,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
A1P023: OtherBoosting social cooperation and social aid
A1P024: More comments:
A1P024: More comments:
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]
Contact person for general enquiries
A1P026: NameAbel MagyariKristian OlesenChristoph GollnerChristoph Gollner
A1P027: OrganizationABUDAalborg UniversityFFGFFG
A1P028: AffiliationResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityOtherOther
A1P028: Other
A1P029: Emailmagyari.abel@abud.huKristian@plan.aau.dkchristoph.gollner@ffg.atchristoph.gollner@ffg.at
Contact person for other special topics
A1P030: NameStrassl IngeborgAlex Søgaard Moreno
A1P031: Emailinge.strassl@salzburg.gv.atasm@aalborg.dk
Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYes
A2P001: Fields of application
A2P001: Fields of application
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
  • Digital technologies
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy production
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production
A2P001: Other
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields- Dynamic district, and building scale energy modelling - Microclimate modelling - Klimaaktiv certification system - Energy community - Flexibility with shared heating and electricity systemsStakeholder engagement, expert energy system analysis, future scenarios
A2P003: Application of ISO52000
A2P003: Application of ISO52000YesNo
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNo
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNo
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationLarge combined industrial, residential, and commercial area with complex flows of in- and outgoing traffic.
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]218
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]148
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P011: PVyesnonono
A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.7770664
A2P011: Windnoyesnono
A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Hydronononono
A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_elnononono
A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnononono
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: PVT_elnononono
A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Othernoyesnono
A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P012: Geothermalyesnonono
A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Solar Thermalnononono
A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_heatnononono
A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Waste heat+HPnoyesnono
A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]300
A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnononono
A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: PVT_thnononono
A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnononono
A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Othernononono
A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesVery little wind production currently exists in the area. The electricity production of the waste incineration plant will be included at a later date. Aalborg East is partly a remarkable area for hosting a Portland cement factory that accounts for a substantial share of Denmark’s total CO2 emissions. In turn, it also provides waste heat to the district heating grid for all of Aalborg city and some of the smaller towns that are connected to the same DH grid.
A2P014: Annual energy use
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]0.819016620
A2P015: Annual energy delivered
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]399
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]-1
A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P017: Gasnononono
A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Coalnononono
A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Oilnononono
A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Othernoyesnono
A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]300
A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P018: PVnononono
A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Windnononono
A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Hydronononono
A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_elnononono
A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnononono
A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: PVT_elnononono
A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Othernononono
A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P019: Geothermalnononono
A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Solar Thermalnononono
A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_heatnononono
A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Waste heat+HPnononono
A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnononono
A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: PVT_thnononono
A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnononono
A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Othernononono
A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary0000
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]
A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
A2P022: Safety & Security
A2P022: HealthCO2) levels, Predicted Mean Vote,Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied, Temperature, Relative Humidity, Illuminance, Daylight factor, Sound pressure levels
A2P022: Education
A2P022: MobilityMode of transport; Access to public transport
A2P022: EnergyNon-renewable primary energy balance, Renewable energy ratio, Grid Purchase factor, Load cover factor/Self-generation, Supply cover factor/Self-consumption, Net energy/Net power, Peak delivered/exported power, Connection capacity credit, Total greenhouse gas emissionsEnergy efficiency in buildings; Net energy need; Gross energy need; Total energy need
A2P022: Water
A2P022: Economic developmentInvestment costs, Share of investments covered by grants, Maintenance-related costs, Requirement-related costs, Operation-related costs, Other costs, Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return, Economic Value Added, Payback Period, nZEB Cost Comparison
A2P022: Housing and CommunityAccess to services, Affordability of energy, Affordability of housing, Democratic legitimacy, Living conditions, Social cohesion, Personal safety, Energy consciousnessDelivery and proximity to amenities
A2P022: Waste
A2P022: OtherGHG emissions; Power/load; Life cycle cost (LCC); Demographic needs and consultation plan; Public Space
A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesyesyesno
A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnoyesnono
A2P023: Wind Turbinesnononono
A2P023: Geothermal energy systemyesnonono
A2P023: Waste heat recoverynoyesyesno
A2P023: Waste to energynoyesnono
A2P023: Polygenerationnononono
A2P023: Co-generationnononono
A2P023: Heat Pumpnoyesyesno
A2P023: Hydrogennononono
A2P023: Hydropower plantnononono
A2P023: Biomassnoyesnono
A2P023: Biogasnononono
A2P023: Other
A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)nononono
A2P024: Energy management systemyesyesnono
A2P024: Demand-side managementyesyesnono
A2P024: Smart electricity gridyesyesnono
A2P024: Thermal Storagenoyesnono
A2P024: Electric Storagenoyesnono
A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnoyesnono
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnoyesnono
A2P024: P2P – buildingsyesnonono
A2P024: Other
A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnoyesyesno
A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnononono
A2P025: High-performance new buildingsyesnonono
A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)nononono
A2P025: Urban data platformsnononono
A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnononono
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)yesnonono
A2P025: Smart irrigationnononono
A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnononono
A2P025: Smart surveillancenoyesnono
A2P025: Other
A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nononono
A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)yesnonono
A2P026: e-Mobilityyesnonono
A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnononono
A2P026: Car-free areanononono
A2P026: Other
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notesShared mobility: a mobility point will be implemented and ensure the flexible use of different mobility services.
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesYes
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance Certificate
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesYesNo
A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesKlimaaktiv certificate, Greenpass certificate
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
  • Smart cities strategies,
  • Urban Renewal Strategies,
  • New development strategies,
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.)
  • Smart cities strategies
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyReduction of 1018000 tons CO2 by 2030
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
  • Biogas
A3P003: Other
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesDecarbonize part of Aalborg city as a way of working incrementally towards being a zero-emission city.
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour- Stakeholder engagement; - Focus on implementing renewable energy production where possible; - Rretrofitting and energy optimization of existing buildings.
A3P006: Economic strategies
A3P006: Economic strategies
  • Innovative business models,
  • Local trading
  • Life Cycle Cost,
  • Circular economy models
A3P006: Other
A3P007: Social models
A3P007: Social models
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
  • Social incentives,
  • Quality of Life,
  • Strategies towards social mix,
  • Affordability,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Policy Forums,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
A3P007: Other
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
  • Building / district Certification
  • Strategic urban planning,
  • District Energy plans
A3P008: Other
A3P009: Environmental strategies
A3P009: Environmental strategies
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Net zero carbon footprint
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Carbon-free
  • Energy Neutral
A3P009: Other
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsCurrent energy tariffs disincentivize both individual and collective PV systems – meaning energy communities are not economically feasible, housing associations and public buildings struggle with finding a secure RoI for solar panels, and citizens and local industry lack an incentive to install solar panels on their own
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionThe large scale provides interesting opportunities for both urban development and strategic energy planning; the diverse mix of buildings and functions also allow for interesting discussions regarding PEDs. Another interesting facet is that the district heating grid is almost fully supplied by waste heat.
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentThe area has an interesting history of development and has recently undergone several urban improvements. This is coupled with a strong local network of business owners and other stakeholders, all with an interest in developing the area in the best way possible. This made for an interesting case from a planning perspective to investigate how this network would pick up on the concept of PED and whether they could see any potential utility in relation to their everyday experiences.
B1P003: Environment of the case study area
B2P003: Environment of the case study areaSuburban areaSuburban areaUrban area
B1P004: Type of district
B2P004: Type of district
  • New construction
  • Renovation
  • New construction,
  • Renovation
  • New construction,
  • Renovation
B1P005: Case Study Context
B1P005: Case Study Context
  • New Development
  • Retrofitting Area
  • Re-use / Transformation Area,
  • New Development,
  • Retrofitting Area
  • Re-use / Transformation Area,
  • New Development,
  • Retrofitting Area
B1P006: Year of construction
B1P006: Year of construction2024
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential16.931
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P011: Population density before intervention
B1P011: Population density before intervention0000
B1P012: Population density after intervention
B1P012: Population density after intervention0000
B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
B1P013: Residentialnononono
B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Officenononono
B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Industry and Utilitynonoyesno
B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Commercialnononono
B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Institutionalnononono
B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Natural areasyesnonono
B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Recreationalnononono
B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Dismissed areasnononono
B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Othernononono
B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
B1P014: Residentialyesnoyesno
B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Officenonoyesno
B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonoyesno
B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Commercialnononono
B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Institutionalnononono
B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Natural areasyesnonono
B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Recreationalnonoyesno
B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Dismissed areasnononono
B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Othernonoyesyes
B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionAn ongoing process and dialogue with local stakeholders to determine the future development of the area.
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P002: Installation life timeNo new installation will be made throughout the project. Rather the project will attempt to establish a local PED network with the aim of empowering the stakeholders to better engage with sustainable technologies.
B2P003: Scale of action
B2P003: ScaleDistrictCampus
B2P004: Operator of the installation
B2P004: Operator of the installationKristian Olesen
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materialsReplication is primarily focused on the establishment of a local network with an interest in and understanding of PED.
B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?No
B2P006: Other
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
  • Civic
B2P007: Other
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabResearch center/University
B2P008: Other
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
  • Academia,
  • Private
B2P009: Other
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Other
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P017: Capacities
B2P017: Capacities
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P018: Relations with stakeholdersStakeholder participation supported by socio-economic research
B2P019: Available tools
B2P019: Available tools
B2P019: Available tools
B2P020: External accessibility
B2P020: External accessibility
C1P001: Unlocking Factors
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
C1P002: Driving Factors
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Economic growth need1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
C1P003: Administrative barriers
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
C1P004: Policy barriers
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Regulatory instability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Non-effective regulations1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P007: Technical barriers
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Deficient planning1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
C1P008: Inertia1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Rebound effect1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
C1P010: Financial barriers
C1P010: Hidden costs1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
C1P011: Market barriers
C1P011: Split incentives1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Energy price distortion1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
C1P012: Stakeholders involved
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
C1P012: Research & Innovation
C1P012: Financial/Funding
C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
C1P012: Business process management
C1P012: Urban Services providers
C1P012: Real Estate developers
C1P012: Design/Construction companies
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
C1P012: Other
C1P012: Other (if any)
Summary

Authors (framework concept)

Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

Contributors (to the content)

Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

Implemented by

Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)