Filters:
NameProjectTypeCompare
Örebro-Vivalla JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Texel JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hällefors, Sweden JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Uncompare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleSalzburg, Gneis district
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city
Freiburg im Breisgau, Dietenbach
Kaiserslautern, EnStadt:Pfaff
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabSalzburg, Gneis districtRiga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student cityFreiburg im Breisgau, DietenbachKaiserslautern, EnStadt:PfaffKladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter StadiumBorlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studyyesyesnononono
PED relevant case studynonoyesyesyesyes
PED Lab.nononoyesnono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusyesnononoyesyes
Energy communityyesyesnonoyesyes
Circularitynononononono
Air quality and urban comfortyesnonononono
Electrificationnonononoyesyes
Net-zero energy costnononononono
Net-zero emissionnononononono
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)noyesnononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynoyesnononoyes
Othernonoyesnonono
Other (A1P004)Sustainable neighbourhood
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabCompletedPlanning PhasePlanning PhaseIn operationPlanning PhasePlanning Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date01/2001/2401/1210/172022
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date01/2412/26
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • General statistical datasets
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
    A1P011: Geographic coordinates
    X Coordinate (longitude):13.04121624.081683397.7954767.75168414.0929615.394495
    Y Coordinate (latitude):47.77101956.9524595648.00615749.43606250.1371560.486609
    A1P012: Country
    A1P012: CountryAustriaLatviaGermanyGermanyCzech RepublicSweden
    A1P013: City
    A1P013: CitySalzburgRigaFreiburg im BreisgauKaiserslauternKladnoBorlänge
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).DfbCfbCfbCfbCfbDsb
    A1P015: District boundary
    A1P015: District boundaryGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographic
    OtherV1* (ca 8 buildings)
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:MixedPublicPublicPublicMixedMixed
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Single OwnerMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle Owner
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED1715810
    A1P019: Conditioned space
    A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]1997621700003700
    A1P020: Total ground area
    A1P020: Total ground area [m²]1192649945
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area010000
    A1P022: Financial schemes
    A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estatenonononoyesno
    A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononoyesno
    A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernononononono
    A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononoyesno
    A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnononononono
    A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnononoyesnono
    A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnononoyesyesno
    A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernononononono
    A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUyesyesnonoyesno
    A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]7500000
    A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonononoyesno
    A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnononononono
    A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernononoyesnono
    A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022: Other
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    • Positive externalities,
    • Other
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Job creation,
    • Positive externalities
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
    A1P023: OtherBoosting social cooperation and social aid
    A1P024: More comments:
    A1P024: More comments:
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]
    Contact person for general enquiries
    A1P026: NameAbel MagyariJudith StiekemaChristoph GollnerChristoph GollnerDavid ŠkorňaJingchun Shen
    A1P027: OrganizationABUDOASCFFGFFGMěsto KladnoHögskolan Dalarna
    A1P028: AffiliationResearch Center / UniversityOtherOtherOtherMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / University
    A1P028: Othernot for profit private organisation
    A1P029: Emailmagyari.abel@abud.hujudith@oascities.orgchristoph.gollner@ffg.atchristoph.gollner@ffg.atdavid.skorna@mestokladno.czjih@du.se
    Contact person for other special topics
    A1P030: NameStrassl IngeborgMichal KuzmičXingxing Zhang
    A1P031: Emailinge.strassl@salzburg.gv.atmichal.kuzmic@cvut.czxza@du.se
    Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYes
    A2P001: Fields of application
    A2P001: Fields of application
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Digital technologies
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy production,
    • Indoor air quality
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy production
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Digital technologies,
    • Indoor air quality
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Construction materials
    A2P001: Other
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields- Dynamic district, and building scale energy modelling - Microclimate modelling - Klimaaktiv certification system - Energy community - Flexibility with shared heating and electricity systemsA suite of replicable modeling tools will enable stakeholders to analyze planning actions towards positive energy in a cost-effective fashion, aiding their evidence based decision-making process. The tools will be able to model the district’s energy production and demand, optimize for flexibility and simulate mobility and transport. By employing gamification and co-creation approaches, the project will enhance public awareness and engagement in energy efficiency. The project will culminate in the publication of practical guidelines, reusable models, algorithms, and training materials to aid other cities to replicate the digital twin for their districts, fostering widespread adoption of sustainable energy practices.Trnsys, PV modelling tools, CADLoad calculation and system optimisation: City Energy Analyst Identification of stranded assets for asset owners and investors to understand the carbon risks: CRREM
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000YesNoNoNo
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesYesYes
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesNoNo
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationThe university operates a fleet of 13 electric vehicles (EV) (61kW power each). There are 5 EV charging stations on campus.Not yet included.
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]80001.40.6777
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]50000.30.03656
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]0
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]0
    A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P011: PVyesnononoyesno
    A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.77706641.1
    A2P011: Windnoyesnononono
    A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Hydronononononono
    A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Biomass_elnononononono
    A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnononononono
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: PVT_elnoyesnononoyes
    A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.01818
    A2P011: Othernononononono
    A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P012: Geothermalyesnonononono
    A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Solar Thermalnononononono
    A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Biomass_heatnoyesnononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Waste heat+HPnonononoyesno
    A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]1.7
    A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: PVT_thnononononoyes
    A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.0825
    A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Othernononononono
    A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesConventional power generation: The university’s heat supply is designed as a local centralized heat supply system. Electrical power, generated in combined heat and power (CHP) units, is delivered to the distribution network and sold to energy traders as regulated by local legislation and norms. There are two natural gas burners acting as heat sources (3MW and 6MW capacity), and two CHP units (1.6MW and 0.45MW thermal capacity). All heating is supplied from the CHP plants. Renewable Energy Sources (RES): a wind turbine (3.6 kW) and PV panels (11.7 kW) are connected to the faculty microgrid. In the future it is planned to power the campus entirely from local RES.Waste heat from cooling the ice rink.
    A2P014: Annual energy use
    A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]0.8190162.10.318
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]0.2055
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]-10
    A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P017: Gasnoyesnononono
    A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Coalnononononono
    A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Oilnononononono
    A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Othernononononoyes
    A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
    A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P018: PVnononononono
    A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Windnononononono
    A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Hydronononononono
    A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_elnononononono
    A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnononononono
    A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: PVT_elnononononono
    A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Othernononononoyes
    A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.187
    A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P019: Geothermalnononononono
    A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Solar Thermalnononononono
    A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_heatnononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Waste heat+HPnononononono
    A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: PVT_thnononononono
    A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Othernononononoyes
    A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary000000.53839572192513
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]-1046.93
    A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
    A2P022: Safety & Securitynone
    A2P022: HealthCO2) levels, Predicted Mean Vote,Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied, Temperature, Relative Humidity, Illuminance, Daylight factor, Sound pressure levelsthermal comfort diagram
    A2P022: Educationnone
    A2P022: Mobilitynone
    A2P022: EnergyNon-renewable primary energy balance, Renewable energy ratio, Grid Purchase factor, Load cover factor/Self-generation, Supply cover factor/Self-consumption, Net energy/Net power, Peak delivered/exported power, Connection capacity credit, Total greenhouse gas emissionsEnergy demand (heating and hot water), Energy demand (cooling), Cooling demand, Distributin losses, PV production, RES production, OER, Primafry Non-renewable energy balance, AMR, HMR, CO2 balancenormalized CO2/GHG & Energy intensity
    A2P022: Water
    A2P022: Economic developmentInvestment costs, Share of investments covered by grants, Maintenance-related costs, Requirement-related costs, Operation-related costs, Other costs, Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return, Economic Value Added, Payback Period, nZEB Cost ComparisonInvestment cost, Caputal cost, Operation cost, payback period, NPV, cummulated cash flow, savings, Life cycle, ROI, SROIcost of excess emissions
    A2P022: Housing and CommunityAccess to services, Affordability of energy, Affordability of housing, Democratic legitimacy, Living conditions, Social cohesion, Personal safety, Energy consciousness
    A2P022: Waste
    A2P022: Other
    A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
    A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesnoyesyesyesyes
    A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnonoyesnonoyes
    A2P023: Wind Turbinesnononononono
    A2P023: Geothermal energy systemyesnonononoyes
    A2P023: Waste heat recoverynononoyesyesyes
    A2P023: Waste to energynononononono
    A2P023: Polygenerationnononononono
    A2P023: Co-generationnononononono
    A2P023: Heat Pumpnonoyesyesyesyes
    A2P023: Hydrogennononononono
    A2P023: Hydropower plantnononononono
    A2P023: Biomassnononononono
    A2P023: Biogasnononononono
    A2P023: Other
    A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
    A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)noyesnonoyesyes
    A2P024: Energy management systemyesyesnonoyesno
    A2P024: Demand-side managementyesyesnonoyesno
    A2P024: Smart electricity gridyesyesnononono
    A2P024: Thermal Storagenoyesyesnonoyes
    A2P024: Electric Storagenoyesnononono
    A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnoyesnonoyesyes
    A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnoyesnonoyesno
    A2P024: P2P – buildingsyesnonononono
    A2P024: Other
    A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
    A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnononoyesyesyes
    A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnononononono
    A2P025: High-performance new buildingsyesnonononono
    A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)nononononono
    A2P025: Urban data platformsnoyesnonoyesno
    A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnoyesnononono
    A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)yesyesnonoyesyes
    A2P025: Smart irrigationnononononono
    A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnononononono
    A2P025: Smart surveillancenononononono
    A2P025: Other
    A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
    A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nononononono
    A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)yesnoyesnonono
    A2P026: e-Mobilityyesnonononono
    A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnononononono
    A2P026: Car-free areanononononono
    A2P026: Other
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notesShared mobility: a mobility point will be implemented and ensure the flexible use of different mobility services.
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesNoYesNo
    A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance CertificateNational standards apply.
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesYesNoNoNo
    A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesKlimaaktiv certificate, Greenpass certificate
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    • Smart cities strategies,
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.)
    • Smart cities strategies,
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyCarbon neutrality 2050The study aligns closely with the decarbonisation and energy reduction pathways of residential multi family buildings with 1.5°C global warming target in Sweden. This study will also contribute to the achievement of the carbon neturality of whole Borlänge city by 2030.
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
    A3P003: Other
    A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
    A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesIn our project, we carried out a comprehensive exploration of strategies to achieve positive energy districts in a Swedish residential portfolio. The focus on urban energy transitions necessitates a holistic approach that integrates building retrofit, solar technology exploration, and heating supply optimisation. Exploration of Local Solar Sources: The analysis reveals varying solar irradiance resources throughout the year, emphasizing the importance of strategic placement. Integration of combined photovoltaic and thermal panels into building envelopes demonstrates the potential to cover a significant portion of the energy demand even in Sweden. Heating Supply Optimisation with Solar Technologies: Despite the surplus energy production from on-site solar technology, challenges arise due to temporal energy asymmetry. The introduction of heat pumps emerges as a feasible solution to balance energy gaps, utilising both rejected and free heat. Optimisation scenarios, utilising a combination of geothermal heat pumps, water source heat pumps, and PVT, showcase remarkable reductions in emissions and primary energy consumption. Urban Form and Energy Infrastructure Design: We realised the importance of returning to urban form and energy infrastructure design to optimise future residential portfolio potential. Building layout design, influenced by zoning regulations and innovative typologies, plays a crucial role in achieving district level energy efficiency. Future challenges, including demographic shifts, e-mobility, and climate change, necessitate a more holistic approach to energy infrastructure design, addressing not only heating and electricity demands but also cooling requirements.
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviourWhile our investigation primarily centres on technical optimisation within Positive Energy District (PED) development, it is essential to acknowledge the broader scope encompassing social and governance dimensions. Specifically, understanding stakeholders' willingness to embrace technical recommendations upon project completion is important. Several potential influencing factors merit exploration, including economic considerations, technical optimisation-associated embodied carbon balance, the general public's technical perceptions, and operational feasibility. Evaluating these aspects holistically not only enhances the efficacy of PED initiatives but also fosters greater acceptance and participation within the communities they serve.
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    • Innovative business models,
    • Local trading
    • Open data business models,
    • Innovative business models,
    • Demand management Living Lab
    • Innovative business models,
    • PPP models,
    • Existing incentives
    • Open data business models,
    • Life Cycle Cost,
    • Circular economy models,
    • Local trading
    A3P006: Other
    A3P007: Social models
    A3P007: Social models
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Social incentives,
    • Quality of Life,
    • Strategies towards social mix,
    • Affordability,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Citizen Social Research
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Affordability
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Social incentives,
    • Affordability,
    • Digital Inclusion
    A3P007: Other
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    • Building / district Certification
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • City Vision 2050,
    • SECAP Updates
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
    • District Energy plans,
    • Building / district Certification
    A3P008: Other
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Low Emission Zone
    • Energy Neutral
    • Energy Neutral
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Carbon-free
    • Net zero carbon footprint
    • Low Emission Zone,
    • Net zero carbon footprint,
    • Life Cycle approach,
    • Sustainable Urban drainage systems (SUDS)
    A3P009: Other
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionExPEDite aims at creating and deploying a novel digital twin, allowing for real-time monitoring, visualization and management of district-level energy flows. Cities consume 65% of the world’s energy supply and are responsible for 70% of the CO² emissions, hence sharing a lot of the responsibility for climate change. We are faced with the challenge of redesigning our existing cities to make them more sustainable, resilient, inclusive and safe. Developing Positive Energy Districts (PEDs), is a breakthrough way to deal with the issue of urban emissions and applying adaptation and mitigation strategies to climate change, while ensuring that these urban areas generate an annual surplus of renewable energy and net zero greenhouse gas emissions. PEDs must address environmental, economic and social issues, providing solutions to energy consumption, production, emissions, transport & mobility and livability. By constantly monitoring and evaluating parameters through existing and/or novel sensor systems (e.g., renewable energy production/supply, transport conditions, air quality, energy demand, meteorological conditions, etc.), unconventional techniques may be applied to provide more sustainable options for the district’s needs.Onsite Energy Ratio > 1The Rymdgatan's Residential Portfolio in Sweden presents a compelling case study for its classification as a PED-related research, given its alignment with sustainable behaviours and overarching PED development principles as follows: Inclusivity and Social Equity: The residential portfolio situated in Rymdgatan caters primarily to a low-income community. By focusing on this demographic, the project addresses critical aspects of social equity within sustainable urban development. Ensuring access to energy-efficient housing and amenities for economically disadvantaged populations not only fosters social cohesion but also mitigates energy poverty, a pressing concern in many urban contexts. Multifamily Residential Building: The inclusion of multifamily residential buildings within the portfolio underscores a commitment to density and efficient land use, both essential components of sustainable urban design. Such developments promote resource optimisation by consolidating housing units, thereby reducing per capita energy consumption and infrastructure demands. Moreover, multifamily dwellings often facilitate community engagement and shared resource management, fostering a culture of sustainability among residents. Low Carbon Retrofitting and Transition: The overarching initiative to transition the entire Jakobsgårdarna district. The included Rymdgatan portfolio, towards low carbon retrofitting, represents a significant example of decarbonization and climate resilience. By integrating energy-efficient technologies and renewable energy solutions into existing infrastructure, the project not only reduces carbon emissions but also serves as a blueprint for revitalising old urban environments sustainably. This holistic approach to retrofitting demonstrates a systemic commitment to environmental stewardship and long-term sustainability. Climate Adaptation and Renewable Energy Integration: Despite Sweden's climatic challenges, including lower solar resources during winter months, the Rymdgatan project leverages its geographical context to optimize renewable energy utilization. Sweden's greater solar resource availability during summer and geothermal potentials complement the design's emphasis on seasonal energy planning, where surplus energy generated during peak periods can be stored or redistributed efficiently. By embracing climate-responsive design strategies, the project demonstrates resilience in the face of climate variability while harnessing renewable energy potential effectively.
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentExpected outcome 1 Increased number of (tangible) city planning actions for positive clean energy districts using the (proto-)PED design, development and management digital twin tools (based on pre-market research learnings) using open-standards based components which can be reused elsewhere. 2 Increased integration of existing smaller scale management systems (e.g. Building management systems) with open-standards based operational city platforms using sectorial data (e.g. building data, mobility, urban planning, etc.). 3 Enhanced data gathering approaches with identification of relevant multidimensional data sets (e.g. meteorological, load profile, social, geo-spatial, etc.) high-resolution real-time data streams (e.g. renewable energy production, energy consumption), and relevant forecasting data, drawing also on the work of common European data spaces. 4 Increased number of city planning departments / approaches using common data and (replicable) elements and processes. 5 Consolidated city sensor network specifications, complemented by appropriate data gathering approaches for soft data. 6 Improved performance of AI based self-learning systems for optimization of positive clean energy districts and bottom-up complex models. 7 Enhanced innovation capacity of local/regional administrations and accelerated uptake of shared, smart and sustainable zero emission solutions.Strategic, economicBorlänge city has committed to become the carbon-neutral city by 2030.
    B1P003: Environment of the case study area
    B2P003: Environment of the case study areaSuburban areaUrban areaSuburban areaUrban areaUrban area
    B1P004: Type of district
    B2P004: Type of district
    • New construction
    • New construction
    • New construction,
    • Renovation
    • New construction,
    • Renovation
    • Renovation
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    • New Development
    • New Development
    • Re-use / Transformation Area,
    • New Development,
    • Retrofitting Area
    • New Development,
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Re-use / Transformation Area,
    • Retrofitting Area
    B1P006: Year of construction
    B1P006: Year of construction20241990
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential100
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential100
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential6
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential6
    B1P011: Population density before intervention
    B1P011: Population density before intervention000000
    B1P012: Population density after intervention
    B1P012: Population density after intervention000000.010658622423328
    B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
    B1P013: Residentialnonononoyesyes
    B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]4360
    B1P013: Officenonononoyesno
    B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Industry and Utilitynononoyesnono
    B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Commercialnononononono
    B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Institutionalnononononono
    B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Natural areasyesnoyesnonono
    B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Recreationalnonononoyesno
    B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Dismissed areasnononononono
    B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Othernononononoyes
    B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]706
    B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
    B1P014: Residentialyesnoyesyesyesyes
    B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]4360
    B1P014: Officenononoyesyesno
    B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Industry and Utilitynononoyesnono
    B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Commercialnononononono
    B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Institutionalnonoyesnonono
    B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Natural areasyesnoyesnonono
    B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Recreationalnononoyesyesno
    B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Dismissed areasnononononono
    B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Othernonoyesyesnoyes
    B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]706
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
    B2P002: Installation life time
    B2P002: Installation life time
    B2P003: Scale of action
    B2P003: ScaleDistrict
    B2P004: Operator of the installation
    B2P004: Operator of the installation
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
    B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
    B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?
    B2P006: Other
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    B2P007: Other
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
    B2P008: Other
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    B2P009: Other
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    B2P011: Other
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P017: Capacities
    B2P017: Capacities
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholdersStakeholder participation supported by socio-economic research
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P020: External accessibility
    B2P020: External accessibility
    C1P001: Unlocking Factors
    C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
    C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
    C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
    C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important
    C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important
    C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important
    C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important
    C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
    C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)Collaboration with the local partners
    C1P002: Driving Factors
    C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
    C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important
    C1P002: Economic growth need1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
    C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
    C1P003: Administrative barriers
    C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
    C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
    C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
    C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important
    C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important
    C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
    C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)Fragmented financial support; lack of experimental budget for complex projects, etc.
    C1P004: Policy barriers
    C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)Different priorities; overall problematic system od decentralization powers; non-fuctioning model of local development funding, etc.
    C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
    C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important
    C1P005: Regulatory instability1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
    C1P005: Non-effective regulations1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important
    C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
    C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important
    C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
    C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
    C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
    C1P006: Environmental barriers
    C1P006: Environmental barriers2 - Slightly important
    C1P007: Technical barriers
    C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
    C1P007: Deficient planning1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
    C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
    C1P007: Lack of well-defined process1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
    C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
    C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
    C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
    C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)Inadequate regulation towards energy transition
    C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
    C1P008: Inertia1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
    C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
    C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P008: Rebound effect1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
    C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
    C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
    C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
    C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
    C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
    C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
    C1P010: Financial barriers
    C1P010: Hidden costs1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P010: Risk and uncertainty1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
    C1P011: Market barriers
    C1P011: Split incentives1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
    C1P011: Energy price distortion1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
    C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
    C1P012: Stakeholders involved
    C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
    • Planning/leading
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Research & Innovation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Planning/leading
    C1P012: Financial/Funding
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
    • Planning/leading,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    C1P012: Business process management
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • None
    C1P012: Urban Services providers
    • Planning/leading,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • None
    C1P012: Real Estate developers
    • Construction/implementation
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Design/demand aggregation
    C1P012: Design/Construction companies
    • Construction/implementation
    • None
    C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
    • Construction/implementation
    • None
    C1P012: Other
    C1P012: Other (if any)
    Summary

    Authors (framework concept)

    Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

    Contributors (to the content)

    Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

    Implemented by

    Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
    Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)