Filters:
NameProjectTypeCompare
Tartu, Estonia V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, the Netherlands (District of Kanaleneiland) V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Portugal V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Uncompare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Uncompare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Uncompare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleTartu, City centre area
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad
Aalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, Denmark
Évora, Portugal
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabTartu, City centre areaRiga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student cityMaia, Sobreiro Social HousingIzmir, District of KarşıyakaStor-Elvdal, Campus EvenstadAalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, DenmarkÉvora, Portugal
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynoyesnoyesnonono
PED relevant case studyyesnononoyesyesyes
PED Lab.yesnoyesnonoyesyes
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesyesyesyesyesno
Annual energy surplusnononoyesyesnoyes
Energy communitynoyesnonononoyes
Circularityyesnononononono
Air quality and urban comfortnononoyesnonono
Electrificationyesnononononono
Net-zero energy costnononoyesnonono
Net-zero emissionyesnononononono
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)noyesnonononono
Maximise self-sufficiencyyesyesyesyesnoyesno
Othernonononoyesnono
Other (A1P004)Energy-flexibility
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabImplementation PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhaseIn operationPlanning PhaseImplementation Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date02/1601/2410/2110/2201/1311/2210/19
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date07/2212/2610/2410/2512/2411/2509/24
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards
A1P009: OtherOther
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
    A1P011: Geographic coordinates
    X Coordinate (longitude):26.72273724.08168339-8.37355727.11004911.07877077353174610.007-7.909377
    Y Coordinate (latitude):58.38071356.9524595641.13580438.49605461.4260442039911257.04102838.570804
    A1P012: Country
    A1P012: CountryEstoniaLatviaPortugalTurkeyNorwayDenmarkPortugal
    A1P013: City
    A1P013: CityTartuRigaMaiaİzmirEvenstad, Stor-Elvdal municipalityAalborgÉvora
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
    A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).DfbCfbCsbCsaDwcDfbCsa
    A1P015: District boundary
    A1P015: District boundaryFunctionalGeographicVirtualGeographicGeographicVirtualGeographic
    Other
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
    A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:PrivatePublicPublicPrivatePublicPublicMixed
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
    A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple Owners
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
    A1P018: Number of buildings in PED1815222122
    A1P019: Conditioned space
    A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]3521717000010279510000
    A1P020: Total ground area
    A1P020: Total ground area [m²]7931441192643260031308000
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
    A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0103000
    A1P022: Financial schemes
    A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estateyesnononononono
    A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]6500000
    A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
    A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernonoyesnononono
    A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingyesnononononono
    A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]4000000
    A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingyesnoyesnoyesnono
    A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]8000000
    A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonoyesnononono
    A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnonononononono
    A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononono
    A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnoyesyesyesnonoyes
    A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]7500000119335519998275
    A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnononoyesyesyesno
    A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonononononono
    A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononono
    A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
    A1P022: Other
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    A1P023: Economic Targets
    • Positive externalities
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    • Positive externalities,
    • Boosting local businesses,
    • Boosting local and sustainable production
    A1P023: Other
    A1P024: More comments:
    A1P024: More comments:
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
    A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]25
    Contact person for general enquiries
    A1P026: NameJaanus TammJudith StiekemaAdelina RodriguesOzlem SenyolÅse Lekang SørensenKristian OlesenJoão Bravo Dias
    A1P027: OrganizationTartu City GovernmentOASCMaia Municipality (CM Maia) – Energy and Mobility divisionKarsiyaka MunicipalitySINTEF / The Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods (ZEN) in Smart CitiesAalborg UniversityEDP Labelec
    A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesOtherMunicipality / Public BodiesMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversitySME / Industry
    A1P028: Othernot for profit private organisation
    A1P029: EmailJaanus.tamm@tartu.eejudith@oascities.orgdscm.adelina@cm-maia.ptozlemkocaer2@gmail.comase.sorensen@sintef.noKristian@plan.aau.dkjoao.bravodias@edp.pt
    Contact person for other special topics
    A1P030: NameKaspar AlevCarolina Gonçalves (AdEPorto)Hasan Burak CavkaAlex Søgaard Moreno
    A1P031: EmailKaspar.alev@tartu.eecarolinagoncalves@adeporto.euhasancavka@iyte.edu.trasm@aalborg.dk
    Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
    A2P001: Fields of application
    A2P001: Fields of application
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
    • Digital technologies,
    • Indoor air quality
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Digital technologies
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
    • Digital technologies
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.)
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Digital technologies,
    • Construction materials
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
    • Digital technologies
    • Energy efficiency,
    • Energy flexibility,
    • Energy production,
    • E-mobility,
    • Digital technologies,
    • Waste management,
    • Construction materials
    A2P001: Other
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
    A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: - buildings retrofitting - combined public and private financing - low temperature central heating - LED lighting Energy production: - installation of photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Digital technologies: - smart-meters smart home system. Smart city information platform E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; - e-bike/bikesharing services implementation. Urban comfort and air quality - Control units for air pollutants concentration (PM2.5, PM10, NO2) - Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan - SECAP)A suite of replicable modeling tools will enable stakeholders to analyze planning actions towards positive energy in a cost-effective fashion, aiding their evidence based decision-making process. The tools will be able to model the district’s energy production and demand, optimize for flexibility and simulate mobility and transport. By employing gamification and co-creation approaches, the project will enhance public awareness and engagement in energy efficiency. The project will culminate in the publication of practical guidelines, reusable models, algorithms, and training materials to aid other cities to replicate the digital twin for their districts, fostering widespread adoption of sustainable energy practices.Energy production: - installation of photovoltaic systems for renewable on-site energy production; - installation of a BIPV demonstrator for the City Hall building. Energy flexibility: - implementation of an energy community through an active citizens involvement process. Digital technologies: - smart-meters installation in some dwellings in order to monitor consumption and suggest more sustainable energy behaviours. [PCP] Through https://balcaodigital.e-redes.pt/consumptions/history “Espaço Municipal” (https://www.espacomunicipal.pt/pt/) might access history of consumption up to midnight of the previous day. E-mobility: - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban comfort and air quality: - Monitoring units for air pollutants concentration (PM2.5, PM10, NO2) [PCP] Currently we are monitoring CO, O3, NO2, SO2, noise, PM2.5 and PM10 at a point 267 m east from the four buildings southeast of Sobreiro area:Methods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4). In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED.Campus Evenstad is a small department at Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, with 220 students. The vision for Campus Evenstad is an energy-flexible Campus Evenstad in an emission-free Europe. The area consists of approx. 20 buildings managed and owned by Statsbygg; the Norwegian government’s building commissioner, property manager and developer. The oldest building is from the 1700-century and the newest is the administration centre (2017) which is a Zero Emission Building (ZEB) with the highest ambitions (ZEB-COM). Their concept has been to realize Campus Evenstad as an energy pilot, where innovative energy solutions are demonstrated, showing how local areas can become more self-sufficient in energy. The energy system at Evenstad consists of several innovative energy solutions that are new in a Norwegian and European context. They are combined in local infrastructure for electricity and heat, which has led to new knowledge and learning about how the solutions work together, and how the interaction is between the local and the national energy system. The solutions consist of solar cells (PV), solar collectors, combined heat and power plant (CHP) based on wood chips, biofuel boiler, electric boiler, grid connection, district heating, heat storage, stationary battery and bidirectional electric vehicle (EV) charging (V2G). Statsbygg has gained a lot of operational experience from Campus Evenstad - both from individual technologies and from the interaction between these, which benefits Statsbygg's 2,200 buildings and 3 million m2 around Norway. Sharing of experiences is central. Campus Evenstad is a pilot in the Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods (ZEN) in Smart Cities were several of the solutions has been developed and studied.Stakeholder engagement, expert energy system analysis, future scenarios
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000
    A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoNoNoYesNoNoNo
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceYesYesYesYesYesNoYes
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
    A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesNoNoYesNoYes
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
    A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationThe university operates a fleet of 13 electric vehicles (EV) (61kW power each). There are 5 EV charging stations on campus.Mobility is not included in the calculations.At Campus Evenstad there is infrastructure for EV charging and bidirectional charging (V2G). EV charging is included in the energy balance.Large combined industrial, residential, and commercial area with complex flows of in- and outgoing traffic.
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
    A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]9.180003.8620.77218
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
    A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]50001.2260.76148
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
    A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
    A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P011: PVyesnoyesyesyesnono
    A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]1.0280.065
    A2P011: Windnoyesnononoyesno
    A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Hydrononononononono
    A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Biomass_elnonononoyesnono
    A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.050
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
    A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: PVT_elnoyesnonononono
    A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P011: Othernononononoyesno
    A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P012: Geothermalnonononononono
    A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Solar Thermalyesnoyesnoyesnono
    A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.50.045
    A2P012: Biomass_heatnoyesnonoyesnono
    A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.35
    A2P012: Waste heat+HPnononononoyesno
    A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]300
    A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: PVT_thnonononononono
    A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
    A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P012: Othernonononononono
    A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
    A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesConventional power generation: The university’s heat supply is designed as a local centralized heat supply system. Electrical power, generated in combined heat and power (CHP) units, is delivered to the distribution network and sold to energy traders as regulated by local legislation and norms. There are two natural gas burners acting as heat sources (3MW and 6MW capacity), and two CHP units (1.6MW and 0.45MW thermal capacity). All heating is supplied from the CHP plants. Renewable Energy Sources (RES): a wind turbine (3.6 kW) and PV panels (11.7 kW) are connected to the faculty microgrid. In the future it is planned to power the campus entirely from local RES.Listed values are measurements from 2018. Renewable energy share is increasing.Very little wind production currently exists in the area. The electricity production of the waste incineration plant will be included at a later date. Aalborg East is partly a remarkable area for hosting a Portland cement factory that accounts for a substantial share of Denmark’s total CO2 emissions. In turn, it also provides waste heat to the district heating grid for all of Aalborg city and some of the smaller towns that are connected to the same DH grid.
    A2P014: Annual energy use
    A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]5.0881.500620
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered
    A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]1399
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
    A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
    A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
    A2P017: Gasnoyesnoyesnonono
    A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Coalnonononononono
    A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Oilnonononononono
    A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
    A2P017: Othernononononoyesno
    A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]300
    A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P018: PVnononoyesnonono
    A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.707
    A2P018: Windnonononononono
    A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Hydrononononononono
    A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_elnonononononono
    A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
    A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
    A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P018: Othernonononononono
    A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
    A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
    A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
    A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_heatnonononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
    A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
    A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
    A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P019: Othernonononononono
    A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
    A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary0001.4540311173975000
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
    A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]980
    A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
    A2P022: Safety & Security
    A2P022: Health
    A2P022: Education
    A2P022: Mobility
    A2P022: Energy
    A2P022: Water
    A2P022: Economic development
    A2P022: Housing and Community
    A2P022: Waste
    A2P022: Other
    A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
    A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesnoyesyesyesyesyes
    A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnonoyesnoyesyesyes
    A2P023: Wind Turbinesnonononononono
    A2P023: Geothermal energy systemnonononononono
    A2P023: Waste heat recoverynononononoyesno
    A2P023: Waste to energynononononoyesno
    A2P023: Polygenerationnonononononono
    A2P023: Co-generationnonononoyesnono
    A2P023: Heat Pumpnonoyesyesnoyesno
    A2P023: Hydrogennonononononono
    A2P023: Hydropower plantnonononononono
    A2P023: Biomassyesnononoyesyesno
    A2P023: Biogasyesnononononono
    A2P023: OtherThe Co-generation is biomass based.
    A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
    A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)yesyesyesnoyesnoyes
    A2P024: Energy management systemyesyesyesnoyesyesyes
    A2P024: Demand-side managementnoyesnonoyesyesno
    A2P024: Smart electricity gridnoyesnononoyesyes
    A2P024: Thermal Storagenoyesnonoyesyesyes
    A2P024: Electric Storagenoyesyesnoyesyesyes
    A2P024: District Heating and Coolingyesyesnonoyesyesno
    A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnoyesyesnoyesyesyes
    A2P024: P2P – buildingsnonononononoyes
    A2P024: OtherBidirectional electric vehicle (EV) charging (V2G)
    A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
    A2P025: Deep Retrofittingyesnoyesyesnoyesno
    A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnonononononoyes
    A2P025: High-performance new buildingsnonononoyesnono
    A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)yesnoyesnononono
    A2P025: Urban data platformsyesyesnonononoyes
    A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensyesyesnonononoyes
    A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)noyesyesyesnonoyes
    A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononononono
    A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonoyesnononoyes
    A2P025: Smart surveillanceyesnonononoyesyes
    A2P025: Other
    A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
    A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)yesnoyesnononono
    A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)yesnononononono
    A2P026: e-Mobilityyesnoyesnoyesnoyes
    A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnonononononoyes
    A2P026: Car-free areanonononononono
    A2P026: Other
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
    A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
    A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesNoYesNoYesYesNo
    A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesThe Municipal Buildings have an energy certificate, according to the Portuguese legislation.Passive house (2 buildings, 4 200 m2, from 2015)
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
    A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoNoYesNoNo
    A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesZero Emission Building (ZEB) with the highest ambitions (ZEB-COM) (admin building, 1 141 m2, 2016)
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.)
    • Smart cities strategies,
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Urban Renewal Strategies,
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract)
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Smart cities strategies,
    • Urban Renewal Strategies,
    • New development strategies,
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
    • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
    • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
    • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
    A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyKarşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030. System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023.Reduction of 1018000 tons CO2 by 2030
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
    • Biogas,
    • Hydrogen
    • Other
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
    • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
    • Biogas
    A3P003: OtherAt a national level there are some studies regarding the decarbonization of the gas grid, but no concrete strategies so far.
    A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
    A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesAccording to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario.Decarbonize part of Aalborg city as a way of working incrementally towards being a zero-emission city.
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
    A3P005: Sustainable behaviour- Stakeholder engagement; - Focus on implementing renewable energy production where possible; - Rretrofitting and energy optimization of existing buildings.
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    A3P006: Economic strategies
    • Innovative business models,
    • PPP models,
    • Life Cycle Cost,
    • Existing incentives
    • Open data business models,
    • Innovative business models,
    • Demand management Living Lab
    • Innovative business models,
    • PPP models,
    • Existing incentives
    • Life Cycle Cost,
    • Circular economy models
    A3P006: Other
    A3P007: Social models
    A3P007: Social models
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Citizen Social Research,
    • Policy Forums,
    • Social incentives,
    • Quality of Life,
    • Prevention of energy poverty,
    • Digital Inclusion,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
    • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Prevention of energy poverty,
    • Digital Inclusion,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
    • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Affordability
    • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
    • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour),
    • Other
    • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
    • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
    • Policy Forums,
    • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
    A3P007: OtherCampus Evenstad is a small department at Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, with 220 students. Sharing knowledge is essential: Evenstad has regular visits from Politicians, decision-makers, researchers, environmental organizations, and energy- and building companies.
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • City Vision 2050,
    • SECAP Updates
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models
    • City Vision 2050,
    • SECAP Updates,
    • Building / district Certification
    • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
    • District Energy plans,
    • SECAP Updates
    • Strategic urban planning,
    • District Energy plans
    A3P008: Other
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    A3P009: Environmental strategies
    • Net zero carbon footprint,
    • Carbon-free,
    • Pollutants Reduction,
    • Greening strategies,
    • Sustainable Urban drainage systems (SUDS),
    • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
    • Energy Neutral
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Net zero carbon footprint,
    • Pollutants Reduction
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Low Emission Zone,
    • Pollutants Reduction
    • Low Emission Zone
    • Energy Neutral,
    • Net zero carbon footprint
    A3P009: Other
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
    A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsCampus Evenstad became a prosumer in 2016, as the first with DSO Eidsiva. Evenstad is also one of the first three PV systems in Norway to receive green certificates.Current energy tariffs disincentivize both individual and collective PV systems – meaning energy communities are not economically feasible, housing associations and public buildings struggle with finding a secure RoI for solar panels, and citizens and local industry lack an incentive to install solar panels on their own
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
    B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionExPEDite aims at creating and deploying a novel digital twin, allowing for real-time monitoring, visualization and management of district-level energy flows. Cities consume 65% of the world’s energy supply and are responsible for 70% of the CO² emissions, hence sharing a lot of the responsibility for climate change. We are faced with the challenge of redesigning our existing cities to make them more sustainable, resilient, inclusive and safe. Developing Positive Energy Districts (PEDs), is a breakthrough way to deal with the issue of urban emissions and applying adaptation and mitigation strategies to climate change, while ensuring that these urban areas generate an annual surplus of renewable energy and net zero greenhouse gas emissions. PEDs must address environmental, economic and social issues, providing solutions to energy consumption, production, emissions, transport & mobility and livability. By constantly monitoring and evaluating parameters through existing and/or novel sensor systems (e.g., renewable energy production/supply, transport conditions, air quality, energy demand, meteorological conditions, etc.), unconventional techniques may be applied to provide more sustainable options for the district’s needs.The pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED).The biggest impact is the demonstration of several new energy solutions for local communities. Statsbygg/Campus Evenstad contributes to the development of innovations, pushing technological development through purchasing and demonstration of the solutions. This is a benefit for both end users, energy service providers and society at large. Evenstad also contribute to developing the local business community. For example, local biomass chip production for CHP, development of V2G-software etc. Several key solutions have been important when aiming to achieve the goals of reduced emissions, increased self-sufficiency in energy, and an energy-flexible campus. Example Vehicle-to-grid (V2G): We realized bidirectional EV charging at Campus Evenstad in 2019, demonstrating V2G for the first time in Norway. The experiences from Evenstad provide increased knowledge and practical experience from purchasing, installing and operating the V2G solution, and can contribute to creating new solutions within the energy system. With the equipment installed, the batteries in EVs can supply power back to buildings or the power grid. Example solar cells (PV): We installed PV in 2013 when there were only a few grid-connected PV systems in Norway. The PV system was an important piece in changing the view on solar energy in Norway, where businesses, the public sector and private individuals started seeing the potential for solar energy also this far north. In 2022, the PV system was expanded with PV cells on the facade of the energy center. Example Solar collector system: Covers 100m2 of the roof surface of dormitories and supplies supplies 117 dormitories with all the hot water they need (4000m2 floor area. The solar collector system is connected to the district heating system, where the main heat source is bioenergy. Solar energy and bioenergy complement each other at different times of the year. Example battery bank: Among the 5 largest electrical batteries in Norway connected to the grid. Example CHP: First of its kind in Norway, generating heat and electricity from biomass. Already in 2010, fossil fuels were phased out by converting from oil to wood-chip heating.The large scale provides interesting opportunities for both urban development and strategic energy planning; the diverse mix of buildings and functions also allow for interesting discussions regarding PEDs. Another interesting facet is that the district heating grid is almost fully supplied by waste heat.The PED main objective is to achieve the energy transition while preserving cultural heritage and improving citizen’s quality of life.
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
    B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentExpected outcome 1 Increased number of (tangible) city planning actions for positive clean energy districts using the (proto-)PED design, development and management digital twin tools (based on pre-market research learnings) using open-standards based components which can be reused elsewhere. 2 Increased integration of existing smaller scale management systems (e.g. Building management systems) with open-standards based operational city platforms using sectorial data (e.g. building data, mobility, urban planning, etc.). 3 Enhanced data gathering approaches with identification of relevant multidimensional data sets (e.g. meteorological, load profile, social, geo-spatial, etc.) high-resolution real-time data streams (e.g. renewable energy production, energy consumption), and relevant forecasting data, drawing also on the work of common European data spaces. 4 Increased number of city planning departments / approaches using common data and (replicable) elements and processes. 5 Consolidated city sensor network specifications, complemented by appropriate data gathering approaches for soft data. 6 Improved performance of AI based self-learning systems for optimization of positive clean energy districts and bottom-up complex models. 7 Enhanced innovation capacity of local/regional administrations and accelerated uptake of shared, smart and sustainable zero emission solutions.In line with the EU's vision of "local energy communities", Campus Evenstad demonstrates energy actions that contribute to the clean energy transition. The campus has been developed over several years, demonstrating several innovative and sustainable technologies and energy solutions in a microgrid, e.g. vehicle to grid (V2G), biomass-based combined heat and power (CHP), solar energy, energy storage and zero emission buildings. It shows how to use new technology to enable zero emissions areas. Dedicated professionals, both Statsbygg's operating staff and researchers from FME ZEN have been central to the realization, together with dedicated management at the University campus, who have shown a great willingness to implement new solutions.The area has an interesting history of development and has recently undergone several urban improvements. This is coupled with a strong local network of business owners and other stakeholders, all with an interest in developing the area in the best way possible. This made for an interesting case from a planning perspective to investigate how this network would pick up on the concept of PED and whether they could see any potential utility in relation to their everyday experiences.POCITYF brings together eight cities (Lightouse and Fellow cities), all having cultural heritage areas in their territory. All are intrinsically motivated to participate in the necessary energy transition not only for their conventional city districts of mixed-used, but also for districts with individually specificities as those belonging in their cultural heritage, which at the moment may be acting as barriers for their further environmental sustainability, but after POCITYF will be acting as a promising building retrofits roadmap for similar and other EU cities.
    B1P003: Environment of the case study area
    B2P003: Environment of the case study areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban areaRuralSuburban areaUrban area
    B1P004: Type of district
    B2P004: Type of district
    • Renovation
    • Renovation
    • New construction,
    • Renovation
    • Renovation
    • Renovation
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    B1P005: Case Study Context
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Retrofitting Area
    • Preservation Area
    B1P006: Year of construction
    B1P006: Year of construction2005
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
    B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential450016.931
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
    B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
    B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
    B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
    B1P011: Population density before intervention
    B1P011: Population density before intervention0000000
    B1P012: Population density after intervention
    B1P012: Population density after intervention0000000
    B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
    B1P013: Residentialyesnonoyesnonono
    B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]102795
    B1P013: Officenonononononono
    B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
    B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Commercialyesnononononono
    B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Institutionalnonononononono
    B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Natural areasyesnononononono
    B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Recreationalyesnononononono
    B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Dismissed areasnonononononono
    B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P013: Othernonononononono
    B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
    B1P014: Residentialyesnonoyesnonono
    B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]102795
    B1P014: Officenonononononono
    B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
    B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Commercialyesnononononono
    B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Institutionalnonononononono
    B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Natural areasyesnononononono
    B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Recreationalyesnononononono
    B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononononono
    B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B1P014: Othernonononononono
    B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
    B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionAn ongoing process and dialogue with local stakeholders to determine the future development of the area.
    B2P002: Installation life time
    B2P002: Installation life timePermanent installationNo new installation will be made throughout the project. Rather the project will attempt to establish a local PED network with the aim of empowering the stakeholders to better engage with sustainable technologies.
    B2P003: Scale of action
    B2P003: ScaleDistrictVirtualDistrictDistrict
    B2P004: Operator of the installation
    B2P004: Operator of the installationCM Maia, IPMAIA, NEW, AdEP.Kristian Olesen
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
    B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materialsReplication is primarily focused on the establishment of a local network with an interest in and understanding of PED.
    B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
    B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?NoNoNo
    B2P006: Other
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
    • Strategic
    • Strategic
    • Civic
    B2P007: Other
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
    B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipalityMunicipalityResearch center/University
    B2P008: Other
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
    • Academia,
    • Private,
    • Industrial,
    • Citizens, public, NGO
    • Academia,
    • Private,
    • Industrial,
    • Citizens, public, NGO,
    • Other
    • Academia,
    • Private
    B2P009: OtherEnergy Agency
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
    B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
    • Buildings,
    • Prosumers,
    • Renewable generation,
    • Energy networks,
    • Lighting,
    • E-mobility,
    • Green areas,
    • User interaction/participation,
    • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)
    • Buildings,
    • Demand-side management,
    • Prosumers,
    • Renewable generation,
    • Energy storage,
    • Efficiency measures,
    • Lighting,
    • E-mobility,
    • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
    • Ambient measures,
    • Social interactions
    • Buildings,
    • Demand-side management,
    • Prosumers,
    • Renewable generation,
    • Energy storage,
    • Energy networks,
    • Waste management,
    • E-mobility,
    • Social interactions,
    • Circular economy models
    B2P011: Other
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
    • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
    • Pivoting and risk-mitigating measures
    • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
    • Tools, spaces, events for testing and validation
    • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
    • Tools for prototyping and modelling,
    • Tools, spaces, events for testing and validation
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
    B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external peopleDepends on the building: _Tecmaia is open to the public but the buildings are for the exclusive use of companies allocated at the industrial site; _The municipal buildings have public access; _The residential buildings have an exclusive use for the residents.
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    B2P014: Monitoring measures
    • Available data,
    • Life Cycle Analysis
    • Execution plan,
    • Available data,
    • Type of measured data
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    B2P015: Key Performance indicators
    • Energy,
    • Sustainability,
    • Social,
    • Economical / Financial
    • Energy,
    • Environmental,
    • Social,
    • Economical / Financial
    • Energy
    B2P016: Execution of operations
    B2P016: Execution of operationsCurrent PED status (WP5 SPARCS): Conceptualization and methodology definition of the (virtual) PED for Maia Municipality with real monitoring and assessment in order to replicate and scale up to a city-level PED. The financial investments were already targeted.
    B2P017: Capacities
    B2P017: Capacities_Energy production and storage, _Monitoring; _Digitization.
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
    B2P018: Relations with stakeholdersThe relationship with stakeholders (municipal companies, industry, citizens, etc) has been fundamental for the definition of the PED. In this sense, some sessions were organized to gather different points of view in order to trace the best path for the PED. Also, the participation of Maia Municipality in EU projects, as EHHUR and OMEGA-X, makes possible the share of knowledge between different partners.
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P019: Available tools
    • Social models
    • Energy modelling,
    • Social models,
    • Business and financial models,
    • Fundraising and accessing resources,
    • Matching actors
    B2P019: Available tools
    B2P020: External accessibility
    B2P020: External accessibility
    C1P001: Unlocking Factors
    C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important
    C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
    C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
    C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
    C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important
    C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
    C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
    C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important
    C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important
    C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important
    C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
    C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
    C1P002: Driving Factors
    C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
    C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important
    C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
    C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important
    C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
    C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
    C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
    C1P003: Administrative barriers
    C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
    C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
    C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
    C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important
    C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
    C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
    C1P004: Policy barriers
    C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important
    C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
    C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
    C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
    C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Non-effective regulations4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
    C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important
    C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
    C1P006: Environmental barriers
    C1P006: Environmental barriers- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 - Water Scarcity: 1
    C1P007: Technical barriers
    C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important
    C1P007: Deficient planning1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
    C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important
    C1P007: Lack of well-defined process3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
    C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)Energy management systems of different new technologies does not "talk together" (e.g. solar inverter, V2G inverter). This creates challenges.
    C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
    C1P008: Inertia4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
    C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Rebound effect3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
    C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
    C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important4 - Important
    C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
    C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)Different interests - Grid/energy stakeholders and building stakeholders
    C1P010: Financial barriers
    C1P010: Hidden costs5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Economic crisis3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
    C1P010: Risk and uncertainty4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
    C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
    C1P011: Market barriers
    C1P011: Split incentives4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Energy price distortion3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
    C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
    C1P012: Stakeholders involved
    C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading
    • Planning/leading
    C1P012: Research & Innovation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Financial/Funding
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Construction/implementation
    C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
    • Planning/leading,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Business process management
    • Planning/leading
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Planning/leading
    C1P012: Urban Services providers
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Real Estate developers
    • None
    • Construction/implementation
    • Planning/leading,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Design/Construction companies
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation
    • Construction/implementation
    • Construction/implementation
    C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Design/demand aggregation
    • None
    C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
    • Planning/leading,
    • Design/demand aggregation,
    • Construction/implementation,
    • Monitoring/operation/management
    • Construction/implementation
    • Construction/implementation
    C1P012: Other
    C1P012: Other (if any)
    Summary

    Authors (framework concept)

    Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

    Contributors (to the content)

    Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

    Implemented by

    Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
    Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)