Name | Project | Type | Compare |
---|---|---|---|
Tartu, Estonia | V2G-QUESTS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Utrecht, the Netherlands (District of Kanaleneiland) | V2G-QUESTS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Aveiro, Portugal | V2G-QUESTS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
SmartEnCity, Lecce | SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
STARDUST, Trento | STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
mySMARTlife, Helsinki | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Sinfonia, Bolzano | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Hunziker Areal, Zürich | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Sharing Cities, Milano | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna | PED Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
Võru +CityxChange | PED Case Study | Compare | |
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
Furuset project, Oslo | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
Laser Valley – Land of Lights | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Ydalir project | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
Fornebu, Bærum | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
Fleuraye west, Carquefou | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Smart Energy Åland | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Romania, Alba Iulia PED | ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
Romania, Alba Iulia PED | InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
Munich, Harthof district | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Lublin | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran | CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 | CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Findhorn, the Park | InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study | Compare |
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED | ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities | PED Case Study | Compare |
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Umeå, Ålidhem district | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study | Compare |
Aalborg East | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare | |
Ankara, Çamlık District | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Trenčín | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Luxembourg, Betzdorf | LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes | PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
Vantaa, Aviapolis | NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
Vidin, Himik and Bononia | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Oslo, Verksbyen | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
Uden, Loopkantstraat | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Zaragoza, Actur | NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Aarhus, Brabrand | BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city | ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins | PED Case Study | Compare |
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Case Study | Compare |
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus | LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes | PED Relevant Case Study | Uncompare |
Espoo, Kera | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio | PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Freiburg, Waldsee | PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district | PED Case Study | Uncompare |
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Graz, Reininghausgründe | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad | ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Oulu, Kaukovainio | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Halmstad, Fyllinge | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare | |
Lund, Brunnshög district | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark | PED Case Study | Compare | |
Évora, Portugal | POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | Compare |
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Groningen, PED South | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Lab | Compare |
Groningen, PED North | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Lab | Compare |
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Lab | Compare |
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT | PED Lab | Compare | |
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district | STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga | MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future | PED Case Study | Compare |
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Compare |
Salzburg, Gneis district | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet | Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods | PED Case Study | Compare |
Tartu, City centre area | SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe | PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab | |
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district | GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab | PED Lab | Compare | |
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Case Study | Uncompare |
Kifissia, Energy community | SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS | PED Relevant Case Study | Compare |
Title | Tartu, City centre area | Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus | Luxembourg, Betzdorf | Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district | Freiburg, Waldsee |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab | |||||
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab | Tartu, City centre area | Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus | Luxembourg, Betzdorf | Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district | Freiburg, Waldsee |
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet | |||||
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet | |||||
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site | |||||
PED case study | no | no | no | yes | yes |
PED relevant case study | yes | yes | yes | no | no |
PED Lab. | yes | no | no | no | no |
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab | |||||
Climate neutrality | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
Annual energy surplus | no | no | yes | no | no |
Energy community | no | no | yes | no | yes |
Circularity | yes | no | yes | no | no |
Air quality and urban comfort | no | yes | yes | yes | no |
Electrification | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
Net-zero energy cost | no | no | no | no | no |
Net-zero emission | yes | no | no | no | yes |
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous) | no | no | no | no | no |
Maximise self-sufficiency | yes | no | no | no | no |
Other | no | yes | no | yes | no |
Other (A1P004) | almost nZEB district | Net-zero emission; Annual energy surplus | |||
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab | |||||
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED Lab | Implementation Phase | Implementation Phase | Implementation Phase | Implementation Phase | Planning Phase |
A1P006: Start Date | |||||
A1P006: Start date | 02/16 | 10/24 | 06/23 | 11/21 | |
A1P007: End Date | |||||
A1P007: End date | 07/22 | 10/28 | 04/26 | 11/24 | |
A1P008: Reference Project | |||||
A1P008: Reference Project | |||||
A1P009: Data availability | |||||
A1P009: Data availability |
|
|
| ||
A1P009: Other | |||||
A1P010: Sources | |||||
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab |
| ||||
A1P011: Geographic coordinates | |||||
X Coordinate (longitude): | 26.722737 | 29.258300 | 6.361602 | 12.318458 | 7.885857135842917 |
Y Coordinate (latitude): | 58.380713 | 41.030600 | 49.682774 | 51.326492 | 47.986535207080045 |
A1P012: Country | |||||
A1P012: Country | Estonia | Turkey | Luxembourg | Germany | Germany |
A1P013: City | |||||
A1P013: City | Tartu | Istanbul | Betzdorf | Leipzig | Freiburg im Breisgau |
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification) | |||||
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification). | Dfb | Cfa | Cfb | Dfb | Cfb |
A1P015: District boundary | |||||
A1P015: District boundary | Functional | Geographic | Geographic | Functional | Virtual |
Other | Geographic | ||||
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab | |||||
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab: | Private | Private | Public | Mixed | |
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure | |||||
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure: | Multiple Owners | Single Owner | Single Owner | Multiple Owners | |
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED | |||||
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED | 18 | 15 | 24 | 2 | 2941 |
A1P019: Conditioned space | |||||
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²] | 35217 | 173.8 | 17000 | 284070 | |
A1P020: Total ground area | |||||
A1P020: Total ground area [m²] | 793144 | 285.400 | 30000 | 4920000 | |
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area | |||||
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
A1P022: Financial schemes | |||||
A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estate | yes | yes | no | no | no |
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | 6500000 | ||||
A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO scheme | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||
A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Other | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||
A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural funding | yes | no | no | no | no |
A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | 4000000 | ||||
A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National funding | yes | no | no | no | no |
A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | 8000000 | ||||
A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional funding | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||
A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal funding | no | no | no | no | yes |
A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||
A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Other | no | no | yes | no | no |
A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||
A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EU | no | yes | no | no | yes |
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||
A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - National | no | no | no | no | yes |
A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||
A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regional | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||
A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Other | no | no | no | no | no |
A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR] | |||||
A1P022: Other | |||||
A1P023: Economic Targets | |||||
A1P023: Economic Targets |
|
|
| ||
A1P023: Other | Sustainable and replicable business models regarding renewable energy systems | ||||
A1P024: More comments: | |||||
A1P024: More comments: | In addition to having the most energy efficient academic building in Turkey, the university campus also has 3 buildings with LEED NC Campus certificate and LEED BD+C Gold certificate. In addition, it aims to continuously improve the energy efficiency objectives on campus in an innovative way. For this purpose, energy management and storage systems are being installed in the Dormitory 6 building, which is used as the demo area of the LEGOFIT project, for the purpose of turning it into a PED project. | ||||
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs | |||||
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR] | 25 | 1 | |||
Contact person for general enquiries | |||||
A1P026: Name | Jaanus Tamm | Cem Keskin | Julien Bertucci | Simon Baum | Dr. Annette Steingrube |
A1P027: Organization | Tartu City Government | Center for Energy, Environment and Economy, Ozyegin University | SNHBM | CENERO Energy GmbH | Fraunhofer Institute for solar energy systems |
A1P028: Affiliation | Municipality / Public Bodies | Research Center / University | Municipality / Public Bodies | Other | Research Center / University |
A1P028: Other | CENERO Energy GmbH | ||||
A1P029: Email | Jaanus.tamm@tartu.ee | cem.keskin@ozyegin.edu.tr | julien.bertucci@snhbm.lu | sib@cenero.de | Annette.Steingrube@ise.fraunhofer.de |
Contact person for other special topics | |||||
A1P030: Name | Kaspar Alev | M. Pınar Mengüç | Simon Baum | ||
A1P031: Email | Kaspar.alev@tartu.ee | pinar.menguc@ozyegin.edu.tr | sib@cenero.de | ||
Pursuant to the General Data Protection Regulation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
A2P001: Fields of application | |||||
A2P001: Fields of application |
|
|
|
|
|
A2P001: Other | |||||
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields | |||||
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields | Energy efficiency: - buildings retrofitting - combined public and private financing - low temperature central heating - LED lighting Energy production: - installation of photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Digital technologies: - smart-meters smart home system. Smart city information platform E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; - e-bike/bikesharing services implementation. Urban comfort and air quality - Control units for air pollutants concentration (PM2.5, PM10, NO2) - Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan - SECAP) | LEED NC Campus + LEGOFIT Project Energy Efficiency: Tri- generation, Compliance with ISO 50001, ASHRAE 90.1, energy efficient appliances, HVAC and lighting Energy flexibility: Energy demand management Energy production: Solar PVs Onsite + (to be installed more) E-mobility: EV Charging stations Indoor Air Quality: Energy Management System, Compliance with ASHRAE 62.1, ASHRAE 55 Construction materials: Passive systems, LEED certified buildings, innovative materials such as PCM Waste Management: Zero waste document | Energy system modeling | ||
A2P003: Application of ISO52000 | |||||
A2P003: Application of ISO52000 | No | Yes | Yes | ||
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance | |||||
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | |
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance | |||||
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance | No | No | No | Yes | |
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation | |||||
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation | Not included, the campus is a non car area except emergencies | All energy demands are included in energy balance, either fuel demands or electrical demand of transport sector; Projection is made of future share of electric mobilty, rest is covered with synthetic fuels to achieve climate neutrality | |||
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand | |||||
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum] | 9.1 | 1.65 | 135.715 | ||
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand | |||||
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum] | 31.76 | ||||
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility | |||||
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum] | 0 | ||||
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure | |||||
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year | |||||
A2P011: PV | yes | yes | no | yes | no |
A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P011: Wind | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P011: Hydro | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P011: Biomass_el | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P011: PVT_el | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P011: Other | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year | |||||
A2P012: Geothermal | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P012: Solar Thermal | yes | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | 0.5 | ||||
A2P012: Biomass_heat | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P012: Waste heat+HP | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P012: Biomass_peat_heat | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P012: PVT_th | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P012: Biomass_firewood_th | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P012: Other | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes | |||||
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes | 53 MW PV potential in all three quarters; no other internal renewable energy potentials known | ||||
A2P014: Annual energy use | |||||
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum] | 3.5 | 2.421 | 132.5 | ||
A2P015: Annual energy delivered | |||||
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year | |||||
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year | |||||
A2P017: Gas | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P017: Coal | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P017: Oil | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P017: Other | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year | |||||
A2P018: PV | no | yes | no | no | no |
A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | 0.00045547 | ||||
A2P018: Wind | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P018: Hydro | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P018: Biomass_el | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P018: Biomass_peat_el | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P018: PVT_el | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P018: Other | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year | |||||
A2P019: Geothermal | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P019: Solar Thermal | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P019: Biomass_heat | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P019: Waste heat+HP | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P019: Biomass_peat_heat | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P019: PVT_th | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P019: Biomass_firewood_th | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P019: Other | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum] | |||||
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary | |||||
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED | |||||
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum] | 980 | ||||
A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab | |||||
A2P022: Safety & Security | |||||
A2P022: Health | |||||
A2P022: Education | |||||
A2P022: Mobility | yes | ||||
A2P022: Energy | apply | yes | |||
A2P022: Water | |||||
A2P022: Economic development | |||||
A2P022: Housing and Community | yes | ||||
A2P022: Waste | |||||
A2P022: Other | |||||
A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation | |||||
A2P023: Photovoltaics | yes | yes | no | no | yes |
A2P023: Solar thermal collectors | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P023: Wind Turbines | no | yes | no | no | no |
A2P023: Geothermal energy system | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P023: Waste heat recovery | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P023: Waste to energy | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P023: Polygeneration | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P023: Co-generation | no | yes | no | no | yes |
A2P023: Heat Pump | no | yes | no | no | yes |
A2P023: Hydrogen | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P023: Hydropower plant | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P023: Biomass | yes | no | no | no | yes |
A2P023: Biogas | yes | no | no | no | yes |
A2P023: Other | |||||
A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility | |||||
A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
A2P024: Energy management system | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
A2P024: Demand-side management | no | yes | no | no | yes |
A2P024: Smart electricity grid | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P024: Thermal Storage | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P024: Electric Storage | no | yes | yes | no | yes |
A2P024: District Heating and Cooling | yes | yes | no | no | yes |
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systems | no | yes | no | no | yes |
A2P024: P2P – buildings | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P024: Other | |||||
A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency | |||||
A2P025: Deep Retrofitting | yes | no | no | no | yes |
A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildings | no | no | no | no | yes |
A2P025: High-performance new buildings | no | yes | yes | no | no |
A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting) | yes | no | no | no | no |
A2P025: Urban data platforms | yes | no | no | no | yes |
A2P025: Mobile applications for citizens | yes | no | no | no | no |
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting) | no | yes | yes | no | no |
A2P025: Smart irrigation | no | yes | no | no | no |
A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposal | no | no | no | no | no |
A2P025: Smart surveillance | yes | yes | no | no | no |
A2P025: Other | |||||
A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility | |||||
A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private) | yes | no | no | no | yes |
A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances) | yes | no | no | no | yes |
A2P026: e-Mobility | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutions | no | yes | no | no | yes |
A2P026: Car-free area | no | yes | no | no | no |
A2P026: Other | |||||
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes | |||||
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes | Test-Concept for bidirectional charging. | ||||
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates | |||||
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | |
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes | |||||
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates | |||||
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates | Yes | Yes | No | ||
A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes | LEED BD+C, LEED NC CAMPUS | ||||
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy | |||||
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy |
|
|
| ||
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy | |||||
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy | Climate neutrality by 2035 | ||||
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid | |||||
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid |
|
|
|
|
|
A3P003: Other | Boiler Automation, Energy Management System, Electric Battery Storage, Demand Management and Flexible Pricing | ||||
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities | |||||
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities | Carbon and Energy Neutrality | Freiburg has ambitious goals and wants to achieve climate neutrality until 2035, the PED concept could help to develop suitable strategies on district level | |||
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour | |||||
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour | Under LEGOFIT project, promoting sustainable behavior for better occupant experience is a targeted aim under a work package. | Energy efficiency by renovation measures for buildings and measures for saving electricity; electrification by installation of heat pumps and photovoltaics and switching to electric cars, additional measures not directly related to PED like sustainable diet and sharing economy | |||
A3P006: Economic strategies | |||||
A3P006: Economic strategies |
|
|
| ||
A3P006: Other | operational savings through efficiency measures | ||||
A3P007: Social models | |||||
A3P007: Social models |
|
|
|
| |
A3P007: Other | |||||
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies | |||||
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies |
|
|
|
| |
A3P008: Other | |||||
A3P009: Environmental strategies | |||||
A3P009: Environmental strategies |
|
|
| ||
A3P009: Other | Positive Energy Balance for the demo site | ||||
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects | |||||
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects | ISO 45001, ISO 14001, ISO 50001, Zero Waste Policy | ||||
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition | |||||
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition | The campus should be considered a PED case study due to its exemplary commitment to sustainability and energy efficiency, as evidenced by several of its buildings achieving LEED certification. This certification underscores the campus's adherence to rigorous environmental standards and its proactive steps towards reducing carbon footprints. Also, the integration of sustainable practices across the campus aligns with the PED framework, which aims to create urban areas that produce more energy than they consume. Therefore, this campus serves as a model of how educational institutions can lead the way in fostering sustainable communities and advancing the goals of PED. | Assessment methods for this ped (and for germany) is defined in this project at the moment and will be tested at that case study | |||
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development | |||||
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development | The purpose of implementing the PED project on this sustainable campus, where several buildings have LEED certification, is to further enhance its energy efficiency and environmental stewardship by creating a district that generates more energy than it consumes. The initiator was motivated by the need to address climate change, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and promote renewable energy sources. Additionally, the campus's existing commitment to sustainability and the success of its LEED-certified buildings provided a strong foundation for demonstrating the feasibility and benefits of PED development, serving as a model for sustainable urban living and energy self-sufficiency. | City is interested in transforming the quarter, as many buildings are old, have private owner structures and have decentralised heating systems. As the city wants to become climate neutral by 2035 action is needed now. In the research project PED urban the idea is to focus on the future energy system of the quarter and use it as a case study to develop a common assessment method for PEDs in alignment with european efforts in that regard | |||
B1P003: Environment of the case study area | |||||
B2P003: Environment of the case study area | Urban area | Suburban area | Rural | Suburban area | |
B1P004: Type of district | |||||
B2P004: Type of district |
|
|
|
| |
B1P005: Case Study Context | |||||
B1P005: Case Study Context |
|
|
|
|
|
B1P006: Year of construction | |||||
B1P006: Year of construction | 2024 | ||||
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential | |||||
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential | 4500 | 5898 | |||
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential | |||||
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential | 5898 | ||||
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential | |||||
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential | 9800 | ||||
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential | |||||
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential | 9800 | ||||
B1P011: Population density before intervention | |||||
B1P011: Population density before intervention | 0 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
B1P012: Population density after intervention | |||||
B1P012: Population density after intervention | 0 | 34.337771548704 | 0 | 0 | 0.0011987804878049 |
B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention | |||||
B1P013: Residential | yes | no | no | no | yes |
B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||
B1P013: Office | no | no | no | no | yes |
B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||
B1P013: Industry and Utility | no | no | no | no | yes |
B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||
B1P013: Commercial | yes | no | no | no | yes |
B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||
B1P013: Institutional | no | yes | no | no | yes |
B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²] | 285.400 | ||||
B1P013: Natural areas | yes | no | no | no | yes |
B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||
B1P013: Recreational | yes | no | no | no | yes |
B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||
B1P013: Dismissed areas | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||
B1P013: Other | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||
B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention | |||||
B1P014: Residential | yes | no | no | no | yes |
B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||
B1P014: Office | no | no | no | no | yes |
B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||
B1P014: Industry and Utility | no | no | no | no | yes |
B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||
B1P014: Commercial | yes | no | no | no | yes |
B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||
B1P014: Institutional | no | yes | no | no | yes |
B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²] | 280000 | ||||
B1P014: Natural areas | yes | no | no | no | yes |
B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||
B1P014: Recreational | yes | no | no | no | yes |
B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||
B1P014: Dismissed areas | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||
B1P014: Other | no | no | no | no | no |
B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²] | |||||
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition | |||||
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition | |||||
B2P002: Installation life time | |||||
B2P002: Installation life time | |||||
B2P003: Scale of action | |||||
B2P003: Scale | District | ||||
B2P004: Operator of the installation | |||||
B2P004: Operator of the installation | |||||
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials | |||||
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials | |||||
B2P006: Circular Economy Approach | |||||
B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials? | No | ||||
B2P006: Other | |||||
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab | |||||
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab |
| ||||
B2P007: Other | |||||
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab | |||||
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab | Municipality | ||||
B2P008: Other | |||||
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab | |||||
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab |
| ||||
B2P009: Other | |||||
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities | |||||
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities | |||||
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab | |||||
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab |
| ||||
B2P011: Other | |||||
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab | |||||
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab |
| ||||
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people | |||||
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people | |||||
B2P014: Monitoring measures | |||||
B2P014: Monitoring measures |
| ||||
B2P015: Key Performance indicators | |||||
B2P015: Key Performance indicators |
| ||||
B2P016: Execution of operations | |||||
B2P016: Execution of operations | |||||
B2P017: Capacities | |||||
B2P017: Capacities | |||||
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders | |||||
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders | |||||
B2P019: Available tools | |||||
B2P019: Available tools |
| ||||
B2P019: Available tools | |||||
B2P020: External accessibility | |||||
B2P020: External accessibility | |||||
C1P001: Unlocking Factors | |||||
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up) | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down) | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.) | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES) | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any) | |||||
C1P002: Driving Factors | |||||
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency) | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P002: Economic growth need | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.) | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any) | |||||
C1P003: Administrative barriers | |||||
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P003: Lack of public participation | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos) | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any) | |||||
C1P004: Policy barriers | |||||
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any) | |||||
C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers | |||||
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P005: Regulatory instability | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P005: Non-effective regulations | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | |
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation | 4 - Important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any) | |||||
C1P006: Environmental barriers | |||||
C1P006: Environmental barriers | Air Quality Management Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Energy Efficiency Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Water Conservation Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Waste Management Importance Level: 4 (Important) Material Selection Importance Level: 4 (Important) Renewable Energy Integration Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Heat Island Effect Mitigation Importance Level: 4 (Important) Noise Pollution Control Importance Level: 3 (Moderately Important) | ||||
C1P007: Technical barriers | |||||
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P007: Deficient planning | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state | 5 - Very important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment | 1 - Unimportant | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any) | |||||
C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers | |||||
C1P008: Inertia | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network | 2 - Slightly important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P008: Rebound effect | 3 - Moderately important | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any) | |||||
C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers | |||||
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities | 2 - Slightly important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any) | |||||
C1P010: Financial barriers | |||||
C1P010: Hidden costs | 5 - Very important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities | 5 - Very important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P010: Economic crisis | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 4 - Important | |
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models | 3 - Moderately important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any) | |||||
C1P011: Market barriers | |||||
C1P011: Split incentives | 4 - Important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 2 - Slightly important | |
C1P011: Energy price distortion | 3 - Moderately important | 5 - Very important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs) | 4 - Important | 4 - Important | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | |
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER | 1 - Unimportant | 3 - Moderately important | 1 - Unimportant | 1 - Unimportant | |
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any) | |||||
C1P012: Stakeholders involved | |||||
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities |
|
|
| ||
C1P012: Research & Innovation |
|
|
| ||
C1P012: Financial/Funding |
|
|
| ||
C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data |
|
|
| ||
C1P012: Business process management |
|
|
| ||
C1P012: Urban Services providers |
|
|
| ||
C1P012: Real Estate developers |
|
|
| ||
C1P012: Design/Construction companies |
|
|
| ||
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens |
|
|
| ||
C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs |
|
|
| ||
C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce |
|
|
| ||
C1P012: Other |
| ||||
C1P012: Other (if any) | |||||
Summary |
Authors (framework concept)
Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)
Contributors (to the content)
Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)
Implemented by
Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)