Search
Close this search box.
Search
Map View
Table View
Projects
Filters:
Clear Filters Export All Entries (CSV)
NameProjectTypeCompare
Tartu, Estonia V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, the Netherlands (District of Kanaleneiland) V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Portugal V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Uncompare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Uncompare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Uncompare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Uncompare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Uncompare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleTartu, City centre area
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district
«×»
Findhorn, the Park
«×»
Umeå, Ålidhem district
«×»
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus
«×»
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab
«×»
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka
«×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabTartu, City centre areaLeon, Former Sugar Factory districtFindhorn, the ParkUmeå, Ålidhem districtIstanbul, Ozyegin University CampusBarcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLabIzmir, District of Karşıyaka
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynoyesyesyesnonoyes
PED relevant case studyyesnononoyesnono
PED Lab.yesnonononoyesno
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesnoyesyesyesnoyes
Annual energy surplusnoyesyesnononoyes
Energy communitynonoyesnonoyesno
Circularityyesnoyesnononono
Air quality and urban comfortnonononoyesnoyes
Electrificationyesnoyesnoyesyesno
Net-zero energy costnonononononoyes
Net-zero emissionyesnoyesnonoyesno
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nononononoyesno
Maximise self-sufficiencyyesyesyesnononoyes
Othernonononoyesyesno
Other (A1P004)almost nZEB districtGreen IT
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabImplementation PhasePlanning PhaseIn operationPlanning PhaseImplementation PhaseIn operationPlanning Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date02/1612/1801/6210/2210/2401/201110/22
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date07/2212/2309/2510/2802/201310/25
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • General statistical datasets
  • General statistical datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
A1P009: OtherOther
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
  •  https://makingcity.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/MakingCity_D4_3_Analysis_of_FWC_candidate_areas_to_become_a_PED_Final.pdf.
    • Umeå Energi
      A1P011: Geographic coordinates
      X Coordinate (longitude):26.722737-5.584795-3.609920.263029.2583002.127.110049
      Y Coordinate (latitude):58.38071342.59339157.653063.825841.03060041.338.496054
      A1P012: Country
      A1P012: CountryEstoniaSpainUnited KingdomSwedenTurkeySpainTurkey
      A1P013: City
      A1P013: CityTartuLeonFindhornUmeåIstanbulBarcelona and Tarragonaİzmir
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).DfbCsbDwcDfbCfaCsaCsa
      A1P015: District boundary
      A1P015: District boundaryFunctionalGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicVirtualGeographic
      Other
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:PrivateMixedMixedPublicPrivatePublicPrivate
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerSingle OwnerSingle OwnerMultiple Owners
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED182116015021
      A1P019: Conditioned space
      A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]3521716.0690042000102795
      A1P020: Total ground area
      A1P020: Total ground area [m²]79314473.1456918000052000285.40032600
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0001003
      A1P022: Financial schemes
      A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estateyesnoyesnoyesnono
      A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]6500000
      A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
      A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernonononononono
      A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingyesnononononono
      A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]4000000
      A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingyesnoyesnononono
      A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]8000000
      A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonononononono
      A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnonononononono
      A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononono
      A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnonoyesnoyesnoyes
      A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]1193355
      A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonononononoyes
      A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonononononono
      A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononono
      A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022: Other
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      • Positive externalities
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production,
      • Boosting consumption of local and sustainable products
      • Job creation,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      A1P023: Other
      A1P024: More comments:
      A1P024: More comments:In addition to having the most energy efficient academic building in Turkey, the university campus also has 3 buildings with LEED NC Campus certificate and LEED BD+C Gold certificate. In addition, it aims to continuously improve the energy efficiency objectives on campus in an innovative way. For this purpose, energy management and storage systems are being installed in the Dormitory 6 building, which is used as the demo area of the LEGOFIT project, for the purpose of turning it into a PED project.Semi-Virtual Energy Integration Laboratory (SEILAB) The Energy Smart Lab is an infrastructure conceived as a flexible and versatile platform for innovative technological developments for both industry and competitive R+D projects. The areas of expertise of this laboratory pivot around the following technologies: – Power Electronics for the integration and control of the elements within a building or community: Renewable Energy Sources (RES), Energy Storage Systems and Electric Vehicles (EV) – ICT Platform for smart communications and energy management of systems, building, networks and communities. – Energy System Integration technologies for smart and flexible buildings and grids including RES and EV. The laboratory operation is based on the hardware emulation approach, which allows for real physical equipment to be operated under a broad range of scenarios without depending on the real occurrence of the boundary conditions suitable for the experimental validation. The laboratory is pioneer in addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation.
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]251
      Contact person for general enquiries
      A1P026: NameJaanus TammBegoña Gonzalo OrdenStefano NebioloGireesh NairCem KeskinDr. Jaume Salom, Dra. Cristina CorcheroOzlem Senyol
      A1P027: OrganizationTartu City GovernmentMunicipality of LeonFindhorn Innovation Research and Education CICUmea MunicipalityCenter for Energy, Environment and Economy, Ozyegin UniversityIRECKarsiyaka Municipality
      A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesOtherResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public Bodies
      A1P028: OtherMunicipality of Leon - ILRUV
      A1P029: EmailJaanus.tamm@tartu.eebegona.gonzalo@aytoleon.esstefanonebiolo@gmail.comgireesh.nair@umu.secem.keskin@ozyegin.edu.trJsalom@irec.catozlemkocaer2@gmail.com
      Contact person for other special topics
      A1P030: NameKaspar AlevMonica Prada CorralM. Pınar MengüçHasan Burak Cavka
      A1P031: EmailKaspar.alev@tartu.eeMonica.Prada@ilruv.espinar.menguc@ozyegin.edu.trhasancavka@iyte.edu.tr
      Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
      A2P001: Fields of application
      A2P001: Fields of application
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
      • Digital technologies,
      • Indoor air quality
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Waste management
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies,
      • Waste management,
      • Indoor air quality,
      • Construction materials
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Digital technologies
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.)
      A2P001: Other
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: - buildings retrofitting - combined public and private financing - low temperature central heating - LED lighting Energy production: - installation of photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Digital technologies: - smart-meters smart home system. Smart city information platform E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; - e-bike/bikesharing services implementation. Urban comfort and air quality - Control units for air pollutants concentration (PM2.5, PM10, NO2) - Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan - SECAP)Energy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit Energy production: - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Energy flexibility: - testing share energy solutions (public-private stakeholders) Digital technologies - smart city platform - smart energy management E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; - e-bike/bikesharing services implementation.Simulation tools: City Energy Analyst and PolysunLEED NC Campus + LEGOFIT Project Energy Efficiency: Tri- generation, Compliance with ISO 50001, ASHRAE 90.1, energy efficient appliances, HVAC and lighting Energy flexibility: Energy demand management Energy production: Solar PVs Onsite + (to be installed more) E-mobility: EV Charging stations Indoor Air Quality: Energy Management System, Compliance with ASHRAE 62.1, ASHRAE 55 Construction materials: Passive systems, LEED certified buildings, innovative materials such as PCM Waste Management: Zero waste documentEnergy SmartLab capacities - Building simulation model: thermal inertia and thermal loads of a building or community can be co-simulated with a building model. – System Operator and Aggregator simulation models: the interaction with remote control actions carried out by electricity System Operators or flexibility Aggregators can be simulated as well. – Grid simulation model: the physical interaction of the building with the grid power supply can be simulated enabling the experimental validation of flexibility services to the network. Energy SmartLab systems - SAFT Li-ion battery: maximum stored energy 20000 Wh, rated power 150 kW, rated discharge current 200 A, rated charge current 34 A, operating voltage 189 V – 227 V – 254 V, capacity 82 Ah. – Ultracapacitors: maximum stored energy 57 Wh, rated power 10 kW, rated current 20 A, peak current (<1s) 200 Apk, operating voltage 250 V – 500 V, capacity 1,65 F. – Electric vehicle second life battery: maximum stored energy 23300 Wh, rated power 40 kW, rated current 150 A, operating voltage 240 V – 400 V, capacity 32 Ah - 5 microgrid emulators (emulated power 5.5 kVA, max generation connected 10kVA, max consumption connected 10 kVA) - 1 grid emulator (Rated power: 200 kVA, Rated current per phase: 350 A, Rated current per neutral conductor: 35)Methods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4). In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED.
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoNoNoYesYes
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceYesNoYesYesYesYes
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNoNoYesNo
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationNot included, the campus is a non car area except emergencies– Electric vehicle second life battery: maximum stored energy 23300 Wh, rated power 40 kW, rated current 150 A, operating voltage 240 V – 400 V, capacity 32 AhMobility is not included in the calculations.
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]9.13.493.862
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.571.201.226
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P011: PVyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
      A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]1.240.2491.028
      A2P011: Windnonoyesnononono
      A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Hydronoyesnonononono
      A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]1.28
      A2P011: Biomass_elnonononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: PVT_elnoyesnonononono
      A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.28
      A2P011: Othernonononononono
      A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P012: Geothermalnonononononono
      A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Solar Thermalyesnoyesnononono
      A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.5
      A2P012: Biomass_heatnonoyesnononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Waste heat+HPnonoyesnononono
      A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: PVT_thnoyesnonononono
      A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonoyesnononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Othernoyesnonononono
      A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes3x225 kW wind turbines + 100 kW PV
      A2P014: Annual energy use
      A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]1.26.13.55.088
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]1.2
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]00
      A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P017: Gasnononononoyesyes
      A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Coalnonononononono
      A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Oilnonononononono
      A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Othernonononononono
      A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P018: PVnonononoyesnoyes
      A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.000455470.707
      A2P018: Windnonononononono
      A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Hydrononononononono
      A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_elnonononononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
      A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Othernonononononono
      A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
      A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
      A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_heatnononoyesnonono
      A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Waste heat+HPnononoyesnonono
      A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
      A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Othernonononononono
      A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary0000001.4540311173975
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]980
      A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
      A2P022: Safety & Security
      A2P022: Health
      A2P022: Education
      A2P022: Mobility
      A2P022: EnergyEnergy
      A2P022: Water
      A2P022: Economic development
      A2P022: Housing and Community
      A2P022: Waste
      A2P022: Other
      A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
      A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
      A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnoyesyesnononono
      A2P023: Wind Turbinesnonoyesnoyesnono
      A2P023: Geothermal energy systemnonononononono
      A2P023: Waste heat recoverynonoyesnononono
      A2P023: Waste to energynonononononono
      A2P023: Polygenerationnonononononono
      A2P023: Co-generationnonononoyesnono
      A2P023: Heat Pumpnoyesyesnoyesnoyes
      A2P023: Hydrogennonononononono
      A2P023: Hydropower plantnoyesnonononono
      A2P023: Biomassyesnoyesnononono
      A2P023: Biogasyesnononononono
      A2P023: Other
      A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
      A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)yesyesnoyesyesyesno
      A2P024: Energy management systemyesyesyesnoyesyesno
      A2P024: Demand-side managementnoyesnoyesyesnono
      A2P024: Smart electricity gridnononononoyesno
      A2P024: Thermal Storagenonoyesnononono
      A2P024: Electric Storagenonoyesnoyesyesno
      A2P024: District Heating and Coolingyesnoyesnoyesnono
      A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnonononoyesnono
      A2P024: P2P – buildingsnoyesnonononono
      A2P024: OtherDistrict Heating
      A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
      A2P025: Deep Retrofittingyesyesnoyesnonoyes
      A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnoyesnonononono
      A2P025: High-performance new buildingsnonoyesnoyesnono
      A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)yesnononononono
      A2P025: Urban data platformsyesyesnonononono
      A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensyesnononononono
      A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)nonononoyesyesyes
      A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononoyesnono
      A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonononononono
      A2P025: Smart surveillanceyesnononoyesnono
      A2P025: Other
      A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
      A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)yesyesnononoyesno
      A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)yesnononononono
      A2P026: e-Mobilityyesyesyesnoyesnono
      A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnoyesnonoyesnono
      A2P026: Car-free areanonononoyesnono
      A2P026: Other
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesYesYesYesNo
      A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance Certificate - in Spain it is mandatory in order to buy or rent a house or a dwelling)
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoYesNo
      A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesLEED BD+C, LEED NC CAMPUS
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.)
      • Smart cities strategies,
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.)
      • Smart cities strategies,
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Smart cities strategies,
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Smart cities strategies,
      • New development strategies
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyKarşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030. System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023.
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      • Biogas,
      • Hydrogen
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
      • Electrification of Cooking Methods
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
      A3P003: OtherNABoiler Automation, Energy Management System, Electric Battery Storage, Demand Management and Flexible Pricing
      A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
      A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesCarbon and Energy Neutrality-Allows for real physical equipment to be operated under a broad range of scenarios without depending on the real occurrence of the boundary conditions suitable for the experimental validation -Pioneer in addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation.According to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario.
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviourUnder LEGOFIT project, promoting sustainable behavior for better occupant experience is a targeted aim under a work package.-Improving the development of Net Zero Energy Buildings and Flexible Energy buildings.
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      • Innovative business models,
      • PPP models,
      • Life Cycle Cost,
      • Existing incentives
      • Demand management Living Lab
      A3P006: Other
      A3P007: Social models
      A3P007: Social models
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
      • Citizen Social Research,
      • Policy Forums,
      • Social incentives,
      • Quality of Life,
      • Prevention of energy poverty,
      • Digital Inclusion,
      • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
      • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
      • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
      • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Quality of Life
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement
      • Digital Inclusion,
      • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Affordability
      A3P007: Other
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      • Strategic urban planning,
      • City Vision 2050,
      • SECAP Updates
      • Strategic urban planning,
      • City Vision 2050,
      • SECAP Updates
      • District Energy plans
      • City Vision 2050,
      • SECAP Updates,
      • Building / district Certification
      • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
      • District Energy plans,
      • SECAP Updates
      A3P008: Other
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      • Net zero carbon footprint,
      • Carbon-free,
      • Pollutants Reduction,
      • Greening strategies,
      • Sustainable Urban drainage systems (SUDS),
      • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Net zero carbon footprint
      • Carbon-free
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Net zero carbon footprint,
      • Greening strategies,
      • Cool Materials
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Pollutants Reduction,
      • Greening strategies
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Pollutants Reduction
      A3P009: Other
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsISO 45001, ISO 14001, ISO 50001, Zero Waste Policy- European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (‘Renewable energy’ directive - 2018/2001/EU and ‘Common rules for the internal electricity market’ directive- 2019/944/EU). - Spanish building certification is regulated through Royal Decree 235/2013.
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionThe campus should be considered a PED case study due to its exemplary commitment to sustainability and energy efficiency, as evidenced by several of its buildings achieving LEED certification. This certification underscores the campus's adherence to rigorous environmental standards and its proactive steps towards reducing carbon footprints. Also, the integration of sustainable practices across the campus aligns with the PED framework, which aims to create urban areas that produce more energy than they consume. Therefore, this campus serves as a model of how educational institutions can lead the way in fostering sustainable communities and advancing the goals of PED.The pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED).
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentThe purpose of implementing the PED project on this sustainable campus, where several buildings have LEED certification, is to further enhance its energy efficiency and environmental stewardship by creating a district that generates more energy than it consumes. The initiator was motivated by the need to address climate change, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and promote renewable energy sources. Additionally, the campus's existing commitment to sustainability and the success of its LEED-certified buildings provided a strong foundation for demonstrating the feasibility and benefits of PED development, serving as a model for sustainable urban living and energy self-sufficiency.
      B1P003: Environment of the case study area
      B2P003: Environment of the case study areaUrban areaUrban areaRuralUrban areaSuburban areaUrban area
      B1P004: Type of district
      B2P004: Type of district
      • Renovation
      • New construction,
      • Renovation
      • New construction
      • Renovation
      • Renovation
      • Renovation
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      • Retrofitting Area
      • Re-use / Transformation Area,
      • Retrofitting Area,
      • Preservation Area
      • New Development
      • Retrofitting Area
      • Retrofitting Area
      • Retrofitting Area
      B1P006: Year of construction
      B1P006: Year of construction20242005
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential4500
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential9800
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential9800
      B1P011: Population density before intervention
      B1P011: Population density before intervention00003400
      B1P012: Population density after intervention
      B1P012: Population density after intervention000034.33777154870400
      B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
      B1P013: Residentialyesyesnoyesnonoyes
      B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]102795
      B1P013: Officenonononononono
      B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
      B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Commercialyesnononononono
      B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Institutionalnonononoyesnono
      B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]285.400
      B1P013: Natural areasyesnoyesnononono
      B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Recreationalyesnononononono
      B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Dismissed areasnonononononono
      B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Othernoyesnonononono
      B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
      B1P014: Residentialyesyesyesyesnonoyes
      B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]102795
      B1P014: Officenonoyesnononono
      B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
      B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Commercialyesnononononono
      B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Institutionalnonononoyesnono
      B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]280000
      B1P014: Natural areasyesnoyesnononono
      B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Recreationalyesnononononono
      B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononononono
      B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Othernoyesnonononono
      B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionaddressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation
      B2P002: Installation life time
      B2P002: Installation life time
      B2P003: Scale of action
      B2P003: ScaleDistrictVirtual
      B2P004: Operator of the installation
      B2P004: Operator of the installationIREC
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
      B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
      B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?NoNo
      B2P006: Other
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      • Strategic
      • Strategic,
      • Private
      B2P007: Other
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipalityResearch center/University
      B2P008: Other
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      • Academia,
      • Private,
      • Industrial,
      • Citizens, public, NGO
      B2P009: Other
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      • Buildings,
      • Prosumers,
      • Renewable generation,
      • Energy networks,
      • Lighting,
      • E-mobility,
      • Green areas,
      • User interaction/participation,
      • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)
      • Demand-side management,
      • Energy storage,
      • Energy networks,
      • Efficiency measures,
      • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)
      B2P011: Other
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
      • Pivoting and risk-mitigating measures
      • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
      • Tools for prototyping and modelling,
      • Tools, spaces, events for testing and validation
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      • Available data,
      • Life Cycle Analysis
      • Equipment
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      • Energy,
      • Sustainability,
      • Social,
      • Economical / Financial
      • Energy,
      • Environmental
      B2P016: Execution of operations
      B2P016: Execution of operations
      B2P017: Capacities
      B2P017: Capacities- Building simulation model: thermal inertia and thermal loads of a building or community can be co-simulated with a building model. – System Operator and Aggregator simulation models: the interaction with remote control actions carried out by electricity System Operators or flexibility Aggregators can be simulated as well. – Grid simulation model: the physical interaction of the building with the grid power supply can be simulated enabling the experimental validation of flexibility services to the network.
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P019: Available tools
      • Social models
      • Energy modelling
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P020: External accessibility
      B2P020: External accessibility
      C1P001: Unlocking Factors
      C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
      C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
      C1P002: Driving Factors
      C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
      C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
      C1P003: Administrative barriers
      C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
      C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
      C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
      C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
      C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
      C1P004: Policy barriers
      C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
      C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
      C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
      C1P005: Non-effective regulations4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important
      C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
      C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
      C1P006: Environmental barriers
      C1P006: Environmental barriersAir Quality Management Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Energy Efficiency Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Water Conservation Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Waste Management Importance Level: 4 (Important) Material Selection Importance Level: 4 (Important) Renewable Energy Integration Importance Level: 5 (Very Important) Heat Island Effect Mitigation Importance Level: 4 (Important) Noise Pollution Control Importance Level: 3 (Moderately Important)- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 - Water Scarcity: 1
      C1P007: Technical barriers
      C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P007: Deficient planning1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P007: Lack of well-defined process3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important
      C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
      C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
      C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
      C1P008: Inertia4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
      C1P008: Rebound effect3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
      C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
      C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
      C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important
      C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
      C1P010: Financial barriers
      C1P010: Hidden costs5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
      C1P010: Economic crisis3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P010: Risk and uncertainty4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important
      C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
      C1P011: Market barriers
      C1P011: Split incentives4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
      C1P011: Energy price distortion3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
      C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
      C1P012: Stakeholders involved
      C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Research & Innovation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Financial/Funding
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
      • Planning/leading,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Business process management
      • Planning/leading
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Urban Services providers
      • Construction/implementation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Real Estate developers
      • None
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Design/Construction companies
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Other
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Other (if any)
      Summary

      Authors (framework concept)

      Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

      Contributors (to the content)

      Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

      Implemented by

      Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
      Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

      Join the Action

      PED-EU-NET is an open, interdisciplinary and growing network welcoming academics, practitioners and relevant stakeholders to contribute to the activities of the work plan.
      Join Now

      COST

      COST is an EU funding programme that enables researchers to set up their interdisciplinary research networks in Europe and beyond. We provide funds for organising conferences, meetings, training schools, short scientific exchanges or other networking activities in a wide range of scientific topics. By creating open spaces where people and ideas can grow, we unlock the full potential of science.

      PED-EU-NET

      The COST Action Positive Energy Districts European Network (PED-EU-NET) aims to mobilise researchers and other relevant stakeholders across different domains and sectors to drive the deployment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Europe through open sharing of knowledge, exchange of ideas, pooling of resources, experimentation of new methods and co-creation of novel solutions.

      Action Details

      Grant Holder
      Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome

      Start of Action: 10 September 2020
      End of Action: 09 September 2024
      CSO approval date: 24/03/2020

      © 2021-2023 PED-EU-NET COST Action CA19126. All rights reserved.