Filters:
NameProjectTypeCompare
Örebro-Vivalla JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Texel JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hällefors, Sweden JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lecce, SmartEnCity SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Firenze, Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Uncompare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Uncompare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Uncompare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Uncompare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
TitleTartu, City centre area
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center
Munich, Harthof district
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabTartu, City centre areaEspoo, Leppävaara district, Sello centerMunich, Harthof districtStor-Elvdal, Campus EvenstadIzmir, District of KarşıyakaBarcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynoyesyesnoyesno
PED relevant case studyyesnonoyesnono
PED Lab.yesnonononoyes
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralityyesyesyesyesyesno
Annual energy surplusnonoyesyesyesno
Energy communitynonoyesnonoyes
Circularityyesnonononono
Air quality and urban comfortnonononoyesno
Electrificationyesnonononoyes
Net-zero energy costnonononoyesno
Net-zero emissionyesnonononoyes
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nononononoyes
Maximise self-sufficiencyyesyesnonoyesno
Othernononoyesnoyes
Other (A1P004)Energy-flexibilityGreen IT
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabImplementation PhaseImplementation PhaseImplementation PhaseIn operationPlanning PhaseIn operation
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date02/1609/1901/2301/1310/2201/2011
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date07/2210/2212/2712/2410/2502/2013
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • General statistical datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • General statistical datasets
A1P009: OtherOther
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
  • M. Hukkalainen, F. Zarrin, K. Klobut, O. Lindholm, M. Ranta, P. Hajduk, T. Vainio-Kaila, E. Wanne, J. Tartia, H. Horn, K. Kontu, J. Juhmen, S. Santala, R. Turtiainen, J. Töyräs, T. Koljonen. (2020). Deliverable D3.1 Detailed plan of the Espoo smart city lighthouse demonstrations. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2020-09/SPARCS_D3.1_Detailed_plan_Espoo.pdf,
  • Hukkalainen, Zarrin Fatima, Krzysztof Klobut, Kalevi Piira, Mikaela Ranta, Petr Hajduk, Tiina Vainio-Kaila , Elina Wanne, Jani Tartia, Angela Bartel, Joni Mäkinen, Mia Kaurila, Kaisa Kontu, Jaano Juhmen, Merja Ryöppy, Reetta Turtiainen, Joona Töyräs, Timo Koljonen (2021) Deliverable 3.2 Midterm report on the implemented demonstrations of solutions for energy positive blocks in Espoo. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2022-02/SPARCS_D3.2.pdf
A1P011: Geographic coordinates
X Coordinate (longitude):26.72273724.810111.56962505994760411.07877077353174627.1100492.1
Y Coordinate (latitude):58.38071360.217948.2043626127515261.4260442039911238.49605441.3
A1P012: Country
A1P012: CountryEstoniaFinlandGermanyNorwayTurkeySpain
A1P013: City
A1P013: CityTartuEspooMunichEvenstad, Stor-Elvdal municipalityİzmirBarcelona and Tarragona
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).DfbDfbCfbDwcCsaCsa
A1P015: District boundary
A1P015: District boundaryFunctionalGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicVirtual
Other
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:PrivateMixedPublicPrivatePublic
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersSingle Owner
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
A1P018: Number of buildings in PED18512622210
A1P019: Conditioned space
A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]3521726795620610000102795
A1P020: Total ground area
A1P020: Total ground area [m²]7931445300056032600
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area050030
A1P022: Financial schemes
A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estateyesnonononono
A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]6500000
A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenononononono
A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernononononono
A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingyesnonononono
A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]4000000
A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingyesnonoyesnono
A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]8000000
A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnononononono
A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnonoyesnonono
A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernononononono
A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnoyesyesnoyesno
A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]6290001193355
A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnononoyesyesno
A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnononononono
A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernononononono
A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
A1P022: Other
A1P023: Economic Targets
A1P023: Economic Targets
  • Positive externalities
  • Job creation,
  • Positive externalities,
  • Boosting local businesses
  • Boosting local businesses,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
  • Positive externalities,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
  • Job creation,
  • Boosting local and sustainable production
A1P023: Other
A1P024: More comments:
A1P024: More comments:Semi-Virtual Energy Integration Laboratory (SEILAB) The Energy Smart Lab is an infrastructure conceived as a flexible and versatile platform for innovative technological developments for both industry and competitive R+D projects. The areas of expertise of this laboratory pivot around the following technologies: – Power Electronics for the integration and control of the elements within a building or community: Renewable Energy Sources (RES), Energy Storage Systems and Electric Vehicles (EV) – ICT Platform for smart communications and energy management of systems, building, networks and communities. – Energy System Integration technologies for smart and flexible buildings and grids including RES and EV. The laboratory operation is based on the hardware emulation approach, which allows for real physical equipment to be operated under a broad range of scenarios without depending on the real occurrence of the boundary conditions suitable for the experimental validation. The laboratory is pioneer in addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation.
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]25
Contact person for general enquiries
A1P026: NameJaanus TammJaano JuhmenStefan SynekÅse Lekang SørensenOzlem SenyolDr. Jaume Salom, Dra. Cristina Corchero
A1P027: OrganizationTartu City GovernmentSIEMENS - Data Center ForumCity of MunichSINTEF / The Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods (ZEN) in Smart CitiesKarsiyaka MunicipalityIREC
A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesSME / IndustryMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / University
A1P028: OtherAndreas Bärnreuther
A1P029: EmailJaanus.tamm@tartu.eeJaano.juhmen@siemens.comstefan.synek@muenchen.dease.sorensen@sintef.noozlemkocaer2@gmail.comJsalom@irec.cat
Contact person for other special topics
A1P030: NameKaspar AlevStefan SynekHasan Burak Cavka
A1P031: EmailKaspar.alev@tartu.eestefan.synek@muenchen.dehasancavka@iyte.edu.tr
Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYes
A2P001: Fields of application
A2P001: Fields of application
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
  • Digital technologies,
  • Indoor air quality
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Digital technologies,
  • Construction materials
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Digital technologies,
  • Construction materials
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.)
  • Energy efficiency,
  • Energy flexibility,
  • Energy production,
  • E-mobility,
  • Digital technologies
A2P001: Other
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: - buildings retrofitting - combined public and private financing - low temperature central heating - LED lighting Energy production: - installation of photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Digital technologies: - smart-meters smart home system. Smart city information platform E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; - e-bike/bikesharing services implementation. Urban comfort and air quality - Control units for air pollutants concentration (PM2.5, PM10, NO2) - Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan - SECAP)Campus Evenstad is a small department at Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, with 220 students. The vision for Campus Evenstad is an energy-flexible Campus Evenstad in an emission-free Europe. The area consists of approx. 20 buildings managed and owned by Statsbygg; the Norwegian government’s building commissioner, property manager and developer. The oldest building is from the 1700-century and the newest is the administration centre (2017) which is a Zero Emission Building (ZEB) with the highest ambitions (ZEB-COM). Their concept has been to realize Campus Evenstad as an energy pilot, where innovative energy solutions are demonstrated, showing how local areas can become more self-sufficient in energy. The energy system at Evenstad consists of several innovative energy solutions that are new in a Norwegian and European context. They are combined in local infrastructure for electricity and heat, which has led to new knowledge and learning about how the solutions work together, and how the interaction is between the local and the national energy system. The solutions consist of solar cells (PV), solar collectors, combined heat and power plant (CHP) based on wood chips, biofuel boiler, electric boiler, grid connection, district heating, heat storage, stationary battery and bidirectional electric vehicle (EV) charging (V2G). Statsbygg has gained a lot of operational experience from Campus Evenstad - both from individual technologies and from the interaction between these, which benefits Statsbygg's 2,200 buildings and 3 million m2 around Norway. Sharing of experiences is central. Campus Evenstad is a pilot in the Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods (ZEN) in Smart Cities were several of the solutions has been developed and studied.Methods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4). In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED.Energy SmartLab capacities - Building simulation model: thermal inertia and thermal loads of a building or community can be co-simulated with a building model. – System Operator and Aggregator simulation models: the interaction with remote control actions carried out by electricity System Operators or flexibility Aggregators can be simulated as well. – Grid simulation model: the physical interaction of the building with the grid power supply can be simulated enabling the experimental validation of flexibility services to the network. Energy SmartLab systems - SAFT Li-ion battery: maximum stored energy 20000 Wh, rated power 150 kW, rated discharge current 200 A, rated charge current 34 A, operating voltage 189 V – 227 V – 254 V, capacity 82 Ah. – Ultracapacitors: maximum stored energy 57 Wh, rated power 10 kW, rated current 20 A, peak current (<1s) 200 Apk, operating voltage 250 V – 500 V, capacity 1,65 F. – Electric vehicle second life battery: maximum stored energy 23300 Wh, rated power 40 kW, rated current 150 A, operating voltage 240 V – 400 V, capacity 32 Ah - 5 microgrid emulators (emulated power 5.5 kVA, max generation connected 10kVA, max consumption connected 10 kVA) - 1 grid emulator (Rated power: 200 kVA, Rated current per phase: 350 A, Rated current per neutral conductor: 35)
A2P003: Application of ISO52000
A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoNoYes
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceYesYesYesYesYes
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoYesNoYes
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationAt Campus Evenstad there is infrastructure for EV charging and bidirectional charging (V2G). EV charging is included in the energy balance.Mobility is not included in the calculations.– Electric vehicle second life battery: maximum stored energy 23300 Wh, rated power 40 kW, rated current 150 A, operating voltage 240 V – 400 V, capacity 32 Ah
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]9.10.773.862
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]0.761.226
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P011: PVyesnoyesyesyesyes
A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.0651.028
A2P011: Windnononononono
A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Hydronononononono
A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Biomass_elnononoyesnono
A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.050
A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnononononono
A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: PVT_elnononononono
A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P011: Othernononononono
A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P012: Geothermalnononononono
A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Solar Thermalyesnoyesyesnono
A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.50.045
A2P012: Biomass_heatnononoyesnono
A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.35
A2P012: Waste heat+HPnononononono
A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnononononono
A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: PVT_thnononononono
A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnononononono
A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P012: Othernononononono
A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesListed values are measurements from 2018. Renewable energy share is increasing.
A2P014: Annual energy use
A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]1.5005.088
A2P015: Annual energy delivered
A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]1
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
A2P017: Gasnonoyesnoyesyes
A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Coalnononononono
A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Oilnonoyesnonono
A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P017: Othernononononono
A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P018: PVnonoyesnoyesno
A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.707
A2P018: Windnonoyesnonono
A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Hydronononononono
A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_elnonoyesnonono
A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonoyesnonono
A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: PVT_elnonoyesnonono
A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P018: Othernononononono
A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
A2P019: Geothermalnonoyesnonono
A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Solar Thermalnononononono
A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_heatnonoyesnonono
A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonoyesnonono
A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnononononono
A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: PVT_thnononononono
A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnononononono
A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P019: Othernononononono
A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary00001.45403111739750
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]980
A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
A2P022: Safety & Security
A2P022: Health
A2P022: Education
A2P022: Mobility
A2P022: EnergyEnergy
A2P022: Water
A2P022: Economic development
A2P022: Housing and Community
A2P022: Waste
A2P022: Other
A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
A2P023: Photovoltaicsyesnoyesyesyesyes
A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnononoyesnono
A2P023: Wind Turbinesnononononono
A2P023: Geothermal energy systemnonoyesnonono
A2P023: Waste heat recoverynononononono
A2P023: Waste to energynononononono
A2P023: Polygenerationnononononono
A2P023: Co-generationnononoyesnono
A2P023: Heat Pumpnonoyesnoyesno
A2P023: Hydrogennononononono
A2P023: Hydropower plantnononononono
A2P023: Biomassyesnonoyesnono
A2P023: Biogasyesnonononono
A2P023: OtherThe Co-generation is biomass based.
A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)yesnoyesyesnoyes
A2P024: Energy management systemyesnoyesyesnoyes
A2P024: Demand-side managementnononoyesnono
A2P024: Smart electricity gridnononononoyes
A2P024: Thermal Storagenonoyesyesnono
A2P024: Electric Storagenonoyesyesnoyes
A2P024: District Heating and Coolingyesnoyesyesnono
A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnonoyesyesnono
A2P024: P2P – buildingsnononononono
A2P024: OtherBidirectional electric vehicle (EV) charging (V2G)
A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
A2P025: Deep Retrofittingyesnoyesnoyesno
A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnononononono
A2P025: High-performance new buildingsnononoyesnono
A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)yesnonononono
A2P025: Urban data platformsyesnoyesnonono
A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensyesnonononono
A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)nonononoyesyes
A2P025: Smart irrigationnononononono
A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnononononono
A2P025: Smart surveillanceyesnonononono
A2P025: Other
A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)yesnonononoyes
A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)yesnonononono
A2P026: e-Mobilityyesnoyesyesnono
A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnonoyesnonono
A2P026: Car-free areanononononono
A2P026: Other
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesYesYesNo
A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesPassive house (2 buildings, 4 200 m2, from 2015)
A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesYesNo
A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesZero Emission Building (ZEB) with the highest ambitions (ZEB-COM) (admin building, 1 141 m2, 2016)
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.)
  • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
  • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
  • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
  • Smart cities strategies,
  • New development strategies
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyCity wide climate neutrality by 2035, city administration climate neutrality by 2030Karşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030. System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023.
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
  • Biogas,
  • Hydrogen
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
  • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
A3P003: Other
A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesAccording to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario.-Allows for real physical equipment to be operated under a broad range of scenarios without depending on the real occurrence of the boundary conditions suitable for the experimental validation -Pioneer in addressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation.
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
A3P005: Sustainable behaviour-Improving the development of Net Zero Energy Buildings and Flexible Energy buildings.
A3P006: Economic strategies
A3P006: Economic strategies
  • Innovative business models,
  • PPP models,
  • Life Cycle Cost,
  • Existing incentives
  • Open data business models
  • Demand management Living Lab
A3P006: Other
A3P007: Social models
A3P007: Social models
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
  • Citizen Social Research,
  • Policy Forums,
  • Social incentives,
  • Quality of Life,
  • Prevention of energy poverty,
  • Digital Inclusion,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
  • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
  • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
  • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
  • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
  • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour),
  • Other
  • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
  • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
  • Affordability
  • Digital Inclusion,
  • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
A3P007: OtherCampus Evenstad is a small department at Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, with 220 students. Sharing knowledge is essential: Evenstad has regular visits from Politicians, decision-makers, researchers, environmental organizations, and energy- and building companies.
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
  • Strategic urban planning,
  • City Vision 2050,
  • SECAP Updates
  • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
  • District Energy plans,
  • SECAP Updates
A3P008: Other
A3P009: Environmental strategies
A3P009: Environmental strategies
  • Net zero carbon footprint,
  • Carbon-free,
  • Pollutants Reduction,
  • Greening strategies,
  • Sustainable Urban drainage systems (SUDS),
  • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
  • Low Emission Zone
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone,
  • Pollutants Reduction
  • Energy Neutral,
  • Low Emission Zone,
  • Pollutants Reduction,
  • Greening strategies
A3P009: Other
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsdecision by the Munich City Council in 2019 to become climate neutral by 2030 / 2035Campus Evenstad became a prosumer in 2016, as the first with DSO Eidsiva. Evenstad is also one of the first three PV systems in Norway to receive green certificates.- European Commission has legislated on Energy Community (‘Renewable energy’ directive - 2018/2001/EU and ‘Common rules for the internal electricity market’ directive- 2019/944/EU). - Spanish building certification is regulated through Royal Decree 235/2013.
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionMunich as demonstrator together with Lyon in ASCEND projectThe biggest impact is the demonstration of several new energy solutions for local communities. Statsbygg/Campus Evenstad contributes to the development of innovations, pushing technological development through purchasing and demonstration of the solutions. This is a benefit for both end users, energy service providers and society at large. Evenstad also contribute to developing the local business community. For example, local biomass chip production for CHP, development of V2G-software etc. Several key solutions have been important when aiming to achieve the goals of reduced emissions, increased self-sufficiency in energy, and an energy-flexible campus. Example Vehicle-to-grid (V2G): We realized bidirectional EV charging at Campus Evenstad in 2019, demonstrating V2G for the first time in Norway. The experiences from Evenstad provide increased knowledge and practical experience from purchasing, installing and operating the V2G solution, and can contribute to creating new solutions within the energy system. With the equipment installed, the batteries in EVs can supply power back to buildings or the power grid. Example solar cells (PV): We installed PV in 2013 when there were only a few grid-connected PV systems in Norway. The PV system was an important piece in changing the view on solar energy in Norway, where businesses, the public sector and private individuals started seeing the potential for solar energy also this far north. In 2022, the PV system was expanded with PV cells on the facade of the energy center. Example Solar collector system: Covers 100m2 of the roof surface of dormitories and supplies supplies 117 dormitories with all the hot water they need (4000m2 floor area. The solar collector system is connected to the district heating system, where the main heat source is bioenergy. Solar energy and bioenergy complement each other at different times of the year. Example battery bank: Among the 5 largest electrical batteries in Norway connected to the grid. Example CHP: First of its kind in Norway, generating heat and electricity from biomass. Already in 2010, fossil fuels were phased out by converting from oil to wood-chip heating.The pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED).
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentspeed and scale of PEDsIn line with the EU's vision of "local energy communities", Campus Evenstad demonstrates energy actions that contribute to the clean energy transition. The campus has been developed over several years, demonstrating several innovative and sustainable technologies and energy solutions in a microgrid, e.g. vehicle to grid (V2G), biomass-based combined heat and power (CHP), solar energy, energy storage and zero emission buildings. It shows how to use new technology to enable zero emissions areas. Dedicated professionals, both Statsbygg's operating staff and researchers from FME ZEN have been central to the realization, together with dedicated management at the University campus, who have shown a great willingness to implement new solutions.
B1P003: Environment of the case study area
B2P003: Environment of the case study areaUrban areaUrban areaRuralUrban area
B1P004: Type of district
B2P004: Type of district
  • Renovation
  • Renovation
  • New construction,
  • Renovation
  • Renovation
B1P005: Case Study Context
B1P005: Case Study Context
  • Retrofitting Area
  • Retrofitting Area
  • Retrofitting Area
  • Retrofitting Area
B1P006: Year of construction
B1P006: Year of construction2005
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential45006
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential6
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
B1P011: Population density before intervention
B1P011: Population density before intervention000000
B1P012: Population density after intervention
B1P012: Population density after intervention000.010714285714286000
B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
B1P013: Residentialyesnoyesnoyesno
B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]102795
B1P013: Officenononononono
B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Industry and Utilitynononononono
B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Commercialyesnonononono
B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Institutionalnononononono
B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Natural areasyesnonononono
B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Recreationalyesnonononono
B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Dismissed areasnononononono
B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P013: Othernononononono
B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
B1P014: Residentialyesnoyesnoyesno
B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]102795
B1P014: Officenononononono
B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Industry and Utilitynononononono
B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Commercialyesnonononono
B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Institutionalnononononono
B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Natural areasyesnonononono
B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Recreationalyesnonononono
B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Dismissed areasnononononono
B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
B1P014: Othernononononono
B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionaddressing the concept and implementation of Microgrids and aims to become a leading experimental facility for improving the optimal development of Flexible Energy Buildings and Flexibility Aggregation
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P002: Installation life time
B2P003: Scale of action
B2P003: ScaleDistrictVirtual
B2P004: Operator of the installation
B2P004: Operator of the installationIREC
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?NoNo
B2P006: Other
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
  • Strategic
  • Strategic,
  • Private
B2P007: Other
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipalityResearch center/University
B2P008: Other
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
  • Academia,
  • Private,
  • Industrial,
  • Citizens, public, NGO
B2P009: Other
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
  • Buildings,
  • Prosumers,
  • Renewable generation,
  • Energy networks,
  • Lighting,
  • E-mobility,
  • Green areas,
  • User interaction/participation,
  • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)
  • Demand-side management,
  • Energy storage,
  • Energy networks,
  • Efficiency measures,
  • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)
B2P011: Other
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
  • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
  • Pivoting and risk-mitigating measures
  • Monitoring and evaluation infrastructure,
  • Tools for prototyping and modelling,
  • Tools, spaces, events for testing and validation
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
B2P014: Monitoring measures
B2P014: Monitoring measures
  • Available data,
  • Life Cycle Analysis
  • Equipment
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
B2P015: Key Performance indicators
  • Energy,
  • Sustainability,
  • Social,
  • Economical / Financial
  • Energy,
  • Environmental
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P016: Execution of operations
B2P017: Capacities
B2P017: Capacities- Building simulation model: thermal inertia and thermal loads of a building or community can be co-simulated with a building model. – System Operator and Aggregator simulation models: the interaction with remote control actions carried out by electricity System Operators or flexibility Aggregators can be simulated as well. – Grid simulation model: the physical interaction of the building with the grid power supply can be simulated enabling the experimental validation of flexibility services to the network.
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
B2P019: Available tools
B2P019: Available tools
  • Social models
  • Energy modelling
B2P019: Available tools
B2P020: External accessibility
B2P020: External accessibility
C1P001: Unlocking Factors
C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
C1P002: Driving Factors
C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
C1P003: Administrative barriers
C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important
C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P003: Lack of public participation1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important
C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
C1P004: Policy barriers
C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
C1P005: Non-effective regulations4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important
C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important
C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
C1P006: Environmental barriers
C1P006: Environmental barriers- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 - Water Scarcity: 1
C1P007: Technical barriers
C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P007: Deficient planning1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Lack of well-defined process3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important
C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important
C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)Energy management systems of different new technologies does not "talk together" (e.g. solar inverter, V2G inverter). This creates challenges.
C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
C1P008: Inertia4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important
C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important
C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important3 - Moderately important
C1P008: Rebound effect3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important
C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important
C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)Different interests - Grid/energy stakeholders and building stakeholders
C1P010: Financial barriers
C1P010: Hidden costs5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
C1P010: Economic crisis3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P010: Risk and uncertainty4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important
C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
C1P011: Market barriers
C1P011: Split incentives4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important4 - Important
C1P011: Energy price distortion3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important5 - Very important
C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important5 - Very important
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
C1P012: Stakeholders involved
C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • None
  • Planning/leading
C1P012: Research & Innovation
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • None
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Financial/Funding
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • None
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
  • Planning/leading,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Business process management
  • Planning/leading
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Planning/leading
C1P012: Urban Services providers
  • Construction/implementation
  • Planning/leading
C1P012: Real Estate developers
  • None
  • Planning/leading
  • Planning/leading,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Design/Construction companies
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation
  • Design/demand aggregation
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • None
  • Monitoring/operation/management
C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • None
C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
  • Planning/leading,
  • Design/demand aggregation,
  • Construction/implementation,
  • Monitoring/operation/management
  • Planning/leading
  • Construction/implementation
C1P012: Other
C1P012: Other (if any)
Summary

Authors (framework concept)

Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

Contributors (to the content)

Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

Implemented by

Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)