Filters:
NameProjectTypeCompare
Örebro-Vivalla JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Texel JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hällefors, Sweden JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Uncompare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lecce, SmartEnCity SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Firenze, Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Uncompare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Uncompare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Uncompare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study
TitleKifissia, Energy community
Trondheim, Svartlamon
Aalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, Denmark
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center
Groningen, PED South
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabKifissia, Energy communityTrondheim, SvartlamonAalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, DenmarkEspoo, Leppävaara district, Sello centerGroningen, PED SouthVienna, Am Kempelenpark
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynononoyesnoyes
PED relevant case studyyesnoyesnonono
PED Lab.noyesyesnoyesno
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralitynoyesyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusnonononoyesyes
Energy communityyesyesnonoyesno
Circularitynonononoyesno
Air quality and urban comfortyesnonononono
Electrificationyesnonononono
Net-zero energy costnononononono
Net-zero emissionnonononoyesno
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nononononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynonoyesyesnono
Othernononononono
Other (A1P004)
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabPlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhaseImplementation PhaseImplementation PhasePlanning Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date11/2411/2209/1912/1807/16
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date03/2611/2510/2212/2302/25
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • General statistical datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • GIS open datasets
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
      • M. Hukkalainen, F. Zarrin, K. Klobut, O. Lindholm, M. Ranta, P. Hajduk, T. Vainio-Kaila, E. Wanne, J. Tartia, H. Horn, K. Kontu, J. Juhmen, S. Santala, R. Turtiainen, J. Töyräs, T. Koljonen. (2020). Deliverable D3.1 Detailed plan of the Espoo smart city lighthouse demonstrations. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2020-09/SPARCS_D3.1_Detailed_plan_Espoo.pdf,
      • Hukkalainen, Zarrin Fatima, Krzysztof Klobut, Kalevi Piira, Mikaela Ranta, Petr Hajduk, Tiina Vainio-Kaila , Elina Wanne, Jani Tartia, Angela Bartel, Joni Mäkinen, Mia Kaurila, Kaisa Kontu, Jaano Juhmen, Merja Ryöppy, Reetta Turtiainen, Joona Töyräs, Timo Koljonen (2021) Deliverable 3.2 Midterm report on the implemented demonstrations of solutions for energy positive blocks in Espoo. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2022-02/SPARCS_D3.2.pdf
      • TNO, Hanze, RUG,
      • Ped noord book
      A1P011: Geographic coordinates
      X Coordinate (longitude):23.81458810.4210.00724.81016.59065516.395292
      Y Coordinate (latitude):38.07734963.436357.04102860.217953.20408748.173598
      A1P012: Country
      A1P012: CountryGreeceNorwayDenmarkFinlandNetherlandsAustria
      A1P013: City
      A1P013: CityMunicipality of KifissiaTrondheimAalborgEspooGroningenVienna
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CsaCfbDfbDfbCfaCwb
      A1P015: District boundary
      A1P015: District boundaryVirtualVirtualVirtualGeographicFunctionalGeographic
      OtherThe energy will be produced by a PV plant installed on the terrace of a municipal building. Members of the energy community (that is under formation) will benefit from the energy produced via virtual net metering. PV instalment and the buildings (owned by the members of the community) will be within the boundaries of the Municipality but not necessary in the same area/district/neighbourhood
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:PrivatePublicMixedPrivate
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle Owner
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED546
      A1P019: Conditioned space
      A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]2679567.86
      A1P020: Total ground area
      A1P020: Total ground area [m²]3200313080005300045.093
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area000500
      A1P022: Financial schemes
      A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estatenonononoyesno
      A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenononononono
      A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernonononoyesno
      A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnononononono
      A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnoyesnonoyesno
      A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnononononono
      A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnonononoyesno
      A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernononononono
      A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnononoyesyesno
      A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]629000
      A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonoyesnonono
      A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnononononono
      A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernononononono
      A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022: Other
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local businesses,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      • Job creation,
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local businesses
      • Boosting local businesses,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      A1P023: Other
      A1P024: More comments:
      A1P024: More comments:
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]0.02
      Contact person for general enquiries
      A1P026: NameArtemis Giavasoglou, Kleopatra KalampokaTatiana González Grandón; Raymundo E. Torres-OlguinKristian OlesenJaano JuhmenJasper Tonen, Elisabeth KoopsGerhard Hofer
      A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of Kifissia – SPARCS local teamNTNUAalborg UniversitySIEMENS - Data Center ForumMunicipality of Groningene7 energy innovation & engineering
      A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversitySME / IndustryMunicipality / Public BodiesSME / Industry
      A1P028: Other
      A1P029: Emailgiavasoglou@kifissia.grtatiana.c.g.grandon@ntnu.noKristian@plan.aau.dkJaano.juhmen@siemens.comJasper.tonen@groningen.nlgerhard.hofer@e-sieben.at
      Contact person for other special topics
      A1P030: NameStavros Zapantis - vice mayorRaymundo E. Torres-OlguinAlex Søgaard Moreno
      A1P031: Emailstavros.zapantis@gmail.comraymundo.torres-olguin@sintef.noasm@aalborg.dk
      Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYes
      A2P001: Fields of application
      A2P001: Fields of application
      • Energy production
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Digital technologies
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
      • Digital technologies
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
      • Waste management
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy production,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
      • Digital technologies,
      • Waste management
      A2P001: Other
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsStakeholder engagement, expert energy system analysis, future scenariosEnergy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streams
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoNo
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNo
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNo
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationLarge combined industrial, residential, and commercial area with complex flows of in- and outgoing traffic.Mobility, till now, is not included in the energy model.
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]142181.86
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]901481.45
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]0
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]9
      A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P011: PVyesnonononono
      A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Windnonoyesnonono
      A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Hydronononononono
      A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_elnononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: PVT_elnononononono
      A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Othernonoyesnonono
      A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P012: Geothermalnonononoyesno
      A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Solar Thermalnonononoyesno
      A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_heatnonononoyesno
      A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Waste heat+HPnonoyesnoyesno
      A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]300
      A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: PVT_thnonononoyesno
      A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Othernononononono
      A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesVery little wind production currently exists in the area. The electricity production of the waste incineration plant will be included at a later date. Aalborg East is partly a remarkable area for hosting a Portland cement factory that accounts for a substantial share of Denmark’s total CO2 emissions. In turn, it also provides waste heat to the district heating grid for all of Aalborg city and some of the smaller towns that are connected to the same DH grid.Geothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centers
      A2P014: Annual energy use
      A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]620
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]399
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P017: Gasnononononono
      A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Coalnononononono
      A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Oilnononononono
      A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Othernonoyesnonono
      A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]300
      A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P018: PVnononononono
      A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Windnononononono
      A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Hydronononononono
      A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_elnononononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnononononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: PVT_elnononononono
      A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Othernononononono
      A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P019: Geothermalnononononono
      A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Solar Thermalnononononono
      A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_heatnononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Waste heat+HPnononononono
      A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: PVT_thnononononono
      A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Othernononononono
      A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary000000
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]
      A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
      A2P022: Safety & Security
      A2P022: Health
      A2P022: Education
      A2P022: Mobility
      A2P022: EnergyYes
      A2P022: Water
      A2P022: Economic development
      A2P022: Housing and Community
      A2P022: Waste
      A2P022: Other
      A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
      A2P023: Photovoltaicsnoyesyesnoyesno
      A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnonoyesnoyesno
      A2P023: Wind Turbinesnononononono
      A2P023: Geothermal energy systemnonononoyesno
      A2P023: Waste heat recoverynonoyesnoyesno
      A2P023: Waste to energynonoyesnoyesno
      A2P023: Polygenerationnononononono
      A2P023: Co-generationnononononono
      A2P023: Heat Pumpnonoyesnoyesno
      A2P023: Hydrogennononononono
      A2P023: Hydropower plantnononononono
      A2P023: Biomassnonoyesnonono
      A2P023: Biogasnononononono
      A2P023: OtherBatteries
      A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
      A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)noyesnonoyesno
      A2P024: Energy management systemnoyesyesnoyesno
      A2P024: Demand-side managementnonoyesnonono
      A2P024: Smart electricity gridnonoyesnonono
      A2P024: Thermal Storagenonoyesnoyesno
      A2P024: Electric Storagenonoyesnoyesno
      A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnonoyesnoyesno
      A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnonoyesnoyesno
      A2P024: P2P – buildingsnoyesnononono
      A2P024: Other
      A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
      A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnonoyesnonono
      A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnonononoyesno
      A2P025: High-performance new buildingsnonononoyesno
      A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)noyesnonoyesno
      A2P025: Urban data platformsnoyesnonoyesno
      A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnononononono
      A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)nononononono
      A2P025: Smart irrigationnononononono
      A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnononononono
      A2P025: Smart surveillancenonoyesnonono
      A2P025: Other
      A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
      A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nononononono
      A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)nononononono
      A2P026: e-Mobilitynonononoyesno
      A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnononononono
      A2P026: Car-free areanononononono
      A2P026: Other
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesYes
      A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance Certificate - in Greece it is mandatory in order to buy or rent a house or a dwellingEnergy Performance Certificate
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNo
      A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notes
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC)
      • Smart cities strategies,
      • Urban Renewal Strategies,
      • New development strategies,
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • New development strategies,
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyReduction of 1018000 tons CO2 by 2030
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
      • Biogas
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
      • Electrification of Cooking Methods,
      • Biogas
      A3P003: Other
      A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
      A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesDecarbonize part of Aalborg city as a way of working incrementally towards being a zero-emission city.
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviour- Stakeholder engagement; - Focus on implementing renewable energy production where possible; - Rretrofitting and energy optimization of existing buildings.In Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed.
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      • Local trading,
      • Existing incentives
      • Life Cycle Cost,
      • Circular economy models
      • Innovative business models,
      • Blockchain
      A3P006: Other
      A3P007: Social models
      A3P007: Social models
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Policy Forums,
      • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Citizen Social Research,
      • Prevention of energy poverty,
      • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
      A3P007: Other
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      • Strategic urban planning,
      • District Energy plans
      • Strategic urban planning,
      • District Energy plans,
      • City Vision 2050,
      • SECAP Updates
      A3P008: Other
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      • Low Emission Zone
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Net zero carbon footprint
      • Energy Neutral
      A3P009: Other
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsCurrent energy tariffs disincentivize both individual and collective PV systems – meaning energy communities are not economically feasible, housing associations and public buildings struggle with finding a secure RoI for solar panels, and citizens and local industry lack an incentive to install solar panels on their ownAt national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen:  Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation.  Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries.  The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals.  Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricity
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionThe large scale provides interesting opportunities for both urban development and strategic energy planning; the diverse mix of buildings and functions also allow for interesting discussions regarding PEDs. Another interesting facet is that the district heating grid is almost fully supplied by waste heat.
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentThe area has an interesting history of development and has recently undergone several urban improvements. This is coupled with a strong local network of business owners and other stakeholders, all with an interest in developing the area in the best way possible. This made for an interesting case from a planning perspective to investigate how this network would pick up on the concept of PED and whether they could see any potential utility in relation to their everyday experiences.
      B1P003: Environment of the case study area
      B2P003: Environment of the case study areaSuburban areaUrban area
      B1P004: Type of district
      B2P004: Type of district
      • Renovation
      • Renovation
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      • Retrofitting Area
      • Re-use / Transformation Area,
      • New Development
      B1P006: Year of construction
      B1P006: Year of construction
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential16.931
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
      B1P011: Population density before intervention
      B1P011: Population density before intervention000000
      B1P012: Population density after intervention
      B1P012: Population density after intervention000000
      B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
      B1P013: Residentialnononononono
      B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Officenononononoyes
      B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Industry and Utilitynononononono
      B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Commercialnononononoyes
      B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Institutionalnononononono
      B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Natural areasnononononono
      B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Recreationalnononononono
      B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Dismissed areasnononononono
      B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Othernononononono
      B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
      B1P014: Residentialnononononoyes
      B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Officenononononoyes
      B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Industry and Utilitynononononono
      B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Commercialnononononoyes
      B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Institutionalnononononono
      B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Natural areasnononononono
      B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Recreationalnononononono
      B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Dismissed areasnononononono
      B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Othernononononono
      B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionAn ongoing process and dialogue with local stakeholders to determine the future development of the area.Groningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city.
      B2P002: Installation life time
      B2P002: Installation life timeNo new installation will be made throughout the project. Rather the project will attempt to establish a local PED network with the aim of empowering the stakeholders to better engage with sustainable technologies.The MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact.
      B2P003: Scale of action
      B2P003: ScaleDistrictDistrict
      B2P004: Operator of the installation
      B2P004: Operator of the installationKristian OlesenThe Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties.
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materialsReplication is primarily focused on the establishment of a local network with an interest in and understanding of PED.Groningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materials
      B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
      B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?NoNo
      B2P006: Other
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      • Civic
      • Civic
      B2P007: Other
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabResearch center/UniversityMunicipality
      B2P008: Other
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      • Academia,
      • Private
      • Academia,
      • Private,
      • Industrial,
      • Other
      B2P009: Otherresearch companies, monitoring company, ict company
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      • Buildings,
      • Demand-side management,
      • Energy storage,
      • Energy networks,
      • Waste management,
      • Lighting,
      • E-mobility,
      • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
      • Social interactions,
      • Business models
      B2P011: Other
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      • Tools for prototyping and modelling
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      • Execution plan,
      • Available data,
      • Type of measured data,
      • Equipment,
      • Level of access
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      • Energy,
      • Social,
      • Economical / Financial
      B2P016: Execution of operations
      B2P016: Execution of operations
      B2P017: Capacities
      B2P017: Capacities
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P019: Available tools
      • Energy modelling,
      • Social models,
      • Business and financial models
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P020: External accessibility
      B2P020: External accessibility
      C1P001: Unlocking Factors
      C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
      C1P002: Driving Factors
      C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)Earthquakes due to gas extraction
      C1P003: Administrative barriers
      C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of public participation3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
      C1P004: Policy barriers
      C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
      C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
      C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Non-effective regulations4 - Important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
      C1P006: Environmental barriers
      C1P006: Environmental barriers
      C1P007: Technical barriers
      C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Deficient planning3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Lack of well-defined process4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
      C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
      C1P008: Inertia4 - Important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Rebound effect4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
      C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
      C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
      C1P010: Financial barriers
      C1P010: Hidden costs5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Economic crisis3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Risk and uncertainty5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
      C1P011: Market barriers
      C1P011: Split incentives5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Energy price distortion3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
      C1P012: Stakeholders involved
      C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: Research & Innovation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Financial/Funding
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Business process management
      • Planning/leading
      C1P012: Urban Services providers
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Real Estate developers
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: Design/Construction companies
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
      • None
      C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Other
      C1P012: Other (if any)
      Summary

      Authors (framework concept)

      Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

      Contributors (to the content)

      Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

      Implemented by

      Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
      Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)