Search
Close this search box.
Search
Map View
Table View
Projects
Filters:
Clear Filters Export All Entries (CSV)
NameProjectTypeCompare
Örebro-Vivalla JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Texel JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hällefors, Sweden JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Uncompare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lecce, SmartEnCity SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Firenze, Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Uncompare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Uncompare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Uncompare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Uncompare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study
TitleKifissia, Energy community
Tartu, Annelinn
«×»
Trondheim, Svartlamon
«×»
City of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block
«×»
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city
«×»
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district
«×»
Groningen, PED North
«×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabKifissia, Energy communityTartu, AnnelinnTrondheim, SvartlamonCity of Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva blockRiga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student cityLeon, Former Sugar Factory districtGroningen, PED North
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynononoyesyesyesno
PED relevant case studyyesyesnonononono
PED Lab.nonoyesnononoyes
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralitynoyesyesnoyesnoyes
Annual energy surplusnononononoyesyes
Energy communityyesyesyesnoyesnoyes
Circularitynonononononoyes
Air quality and urban comfortyesnononononono
Electrificationyesyesnonononono
Net-zero energy costnonononononono
Net-zero emissionnonononononoyes
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nonononoyesnono
Maximise self-sufficiencynononoyesyesyesno
Othernonononononono
Other (A1P004)
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabPlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhaseIn operationPlanning PhasePlanning PhaseImplementation Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date12/2311/2406/1801/2412/1812/18
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date11/2603/2603/2212/2612/2312/23
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • General statistical datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Meteorological open data,
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • Open data city platform – different dashboards,
  • GIS open datasets
A1P009: Other
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
        • M. Hukkalainen, F. Zarrin, K. Klobut, O. Lindholm, M. Ranta, P. Hajduk, T. Vainio-Kaila, E. Wanne, J. Tartia, H. Horn, K. Kontu, J. Juhmen, S. Santala, R. Turtiainen, J. Töyräs, T. Koljonen. (2020). Deliverable D3.1 Detailed plan of the Espoo smart city lighthouse demonstrations. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2020-09/SPARCS_D3.1_Detailed_plan_Espoo.pdf,
        • Hukkalainen, Zarrin Fatima, Krzysztof Klobut, Kalevi Piira, Mikaela Ranta, Petr Hajduk, Tiina Vainio-Kaila , Elina Wanne, Jani Tartia, Angela Bartel, Joni Mäkinen, Mia Kaurila, Kaisa Kontu, Jaano Juhmen, Merja Ryöppy, Reetta Turtiainen, Joona Töyräs, Timo Koljonen (2021) Deliverable 3.2 Midterm report on the implemented demonstrations of solutions for energy positive blocks in Espoo. Available online: https://www.sparcs.info/sites/default/files/2022-02/SPARCS_D3.2.pdf,
        • www.lippulaiva.fi
        •  https://makingcity.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/MakingCity_D4_3_Analysis_of_FWC_candidate_areas_to_become_a_PED_Final.pdf.
        • TNO, Hanze, RUG,
        • Ped noord book
        A1P011: Geographic coordinates
        X Coordinate (longitude):23.81458826.748110.4224.654324.08168339-5.5847956.535121
        Y Coordinate (latitude):38.07734958.370863.436360.149156.9524595642.59339153.234846
        A1P012: Country
        A1P012: CountryGreeceEstoniaNorwayFinlandLatviaSpainNetherlands
        A1P013: City
        A1P013: CityMunicipality of KifissiaTartuTrondheimEspooRigaLeonGroningen
        A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
        A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CsaDfbCfbDfbCfbCsbCfa
        A1P015: District boundary
        A1P015: District boundaryVirtualGeographicVirtualGeographicGeographicGeographicFunctional
        OtherThe energy will be produced by a PV plant installed on the terrace of a municipal building. Members of the energy community (that is under formation) will benefit from the energy produced via virtual net metering. PV instalment and the buildings (owned by the members of the community) will be within the boundaries of the Municipality but not necessary in the same area/district/neighbourhood
        A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
        A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:PublicPrivatePrivatePublicMixedMixed
        A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
        A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersMultiple OwnersMultiple Owners
        A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
        A1P018: Number of buildings in PED915217
        A1P019: Conditioned space
        A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]11200017000016.069001.01
        A1P020: Total ground area
        A1P020: Total ground area [m²]5400000320016500011926473.1456917.132
        A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
        A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0001100
        A1P022: Financial schemes
        A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estatenononoyesnonoyes
        A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
        A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernonononononoyes
        A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononononono
        A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnoyesyesnononoyes
        A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonononononono
        A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnonononononoyes
        A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononono
        A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnononoyesyesnoyes
        A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]3088757500000
        A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnonononononono
        A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonononononono
        A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononono
        A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
        A1P022: Other
        A1P023: Economic Targets
        A1P023: Economic Targets
        • Job creation,
        • Positive externalities,
        • Boosting local businesses
        • Boosting local businesses,
        • Boosting local and sustainable production
        • Boosting local businesses,
        • Boosting local and sustainable production
        A1P023: Other
        A1P024: More comments:
        A1P024: More comments:The Espoonlahti district is located on the south-western coast of Espoo. With 56,000 inhabitants, it is the second largest of the Espoo city centres. The number of inhabitants is estimated to grow to 70,000 within the next 10 years. Espoonlahti will be a future transit hub of the south-western Espoo, along the metro line, and the increasing stream of passengers provides a huge potential for retail, business and residential developments. E-mobility solutions and last-mile services have strong potential in the area when subway extension is finished and running. The extensive (re)development of the Lippulaiva blocks make a benchmark catering to the everyday needs of residents. The completely new shopping centre is a state-of-the-art cross point with 20,000 daily customers and 10,000 daily commuters (3.5 million/year). The new underground metro line and station, and feeder line bus terminal, are fully integrated. Residential housing of approximately 550 new apartments will be built on top. Lippulaiva is a large traffic hub, directly connected to public transport and right next to the Länsiväylä highway and extensive cycle paths. Lippulaiva offers diverse, mixed-use services, such as a shopping mall, public services, a day care centre, residential apartment buildings, and underground parking facilities. Lippulaiva received the LEED Gold environmental certificate and Smart Building Gold certificate. • Flagship of sustainability • Cooling and heating demand from geothermal energy system (on-site) with energy storage system, 4 MW • PV panels: roof and façade, 630 kWp • Smart control strategies for electricity and thermal energy, smart microgrid-system and battery storage • Charging capacity for 134 EVs
        A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
        A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]0.02
        Contact person for general enquiries
        A1P026: NameArtemis Giavasoglou, Kleopatra KalampokaDr. Gonçalo Homem De Almeida Rodriguez CorreiaTatiana González Grandón; Raymundo E. Torres-OlguinElina EkelundJudith StiekemaBegoña Gonzalo OrdenJasper Tonen, Elisabeth Koops
        A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of Kifissia – SPARCS local teamDelft University of TechnologyNTNUCitycon OyjOASCMunicipality of LeonMunicipality of Groningen
        A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversitySME / IndustryOtherOtherMunicipality / Public Bodies
        A1P028: Othernot for profit private organisationMunicipality of Leon - ILRUV
        A1P029: Emailgiavasoglou@kifissia.grg.correia@tudelft.nltatiana.c.g.grandon@ntnu.noElina.ekelund@citycon.comjudith@oascities.orgbegona.gonzalo@aytoleon.esJasper.tonen@groningen.nl
        Contact person for other special topics
        A1P030: NameStavros Zapantis - vice mayorQiaochu FanRaymundo E. Torres-OlguinElina EkelundMonica Prada Corral
        A1P031: Emailstavros.zapantis@gmail.comq.fan-1@tudelft.nlraymundo.torres-olguin@sintef.noElina.ekelund@citycon.comMonica.Prada@ilruv.es
        Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYes
        A2P001: Fields of application
        A2P001: Fields of application
        • Energy production
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • E-mobility,
        • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
        • Digital technologies
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Digital technologies
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production,
        • E-mobility,
        • Digital technologies
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production,
        • E-mobility,
        • Digital technologies
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production,
        • E-mobility,
        • Digital technologies
        • Energy efficiency,
        • Energy flexibility,
        • Energy production,
        • E-mobility,
        • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
        • Waste management
        A2P001: Other
        A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
        A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsEnergy efficiency: - eliminating waste energy utilizing smart energy system - utilizing excess heat from grocery stores Energy flexibility: - A battery energy storage system (1,5 MW/1,5MWh); Active participation in Nordpool electricity market (FCR-N) Energy production: - heating and cooling from geothermal heat pump system; 171 energy wells (over 51 km); heat capacity 4 MW - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Estimation of annual production is about 540 MWh (630 kWp) E-mobility - Installation of charging stations for electric vehicles (for 134 EVs) - e-bike services (warm storage room, charging cabinets for e-bikes) Digital technologies: - Building Analytics system by Schneider ElectricA suite of replicable modeling tools will enable stakeholders to analyze planning actions towards positive energy in a cost-effective fashion, aiding their evidence based decision-making process. The tools will be able to model the district’s energy production and demand, optimize for flexibility and simulate mobility and transport. By employing gamification and co-creation approaches, the project will enhance public awareness and engagement in energy efficiency. The project will culminate in the publication of practical guidelines, reusable models, algorithms, and training materials to aid other cities to replicate the digital twin for their districts, fostering widespread adoption of sustainable energy practices.Energy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit Energy production: - installation of new photovoltaic (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; Energy flexibility: - testing share energy solutions (public-private stakeholders) Digital technologies - smart city platform - smart energy management E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; - e-bike/bikesharing services implementation.Energy efficiency: - buildings energy retrofit supported by tax bonuses - replacing heat supply technologies Energy production: - installation of new (PV) systems for renewable on-site energy production; - presence of a large PV plant in the South East (2 solar parks: 12MW and 107MW) and North area (0,4 MW) Energy flexibility: - energy storage solutions, battery storage and possible hydrogen production - GRID balancing services E-mobility - Installation of new charging stations for electric vehicles; Urban Management - make use of the organizational structure Waste Management - circular use of municipal waste streams
        A2P003: Application of ISO52000
        A2P003: Application of ISO52000YesNoNoNo
        A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
        A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceYesYesNoNo
        A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
        A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoYesNoNo
        A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
        A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationMobility is not included in the energy model.The university operates a fleet of 13 electric vehicles (EV) (61kW power each). There are 5 EV charging stations on campus.Mobility, till now, is not included in the energy model.
        A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
        A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]145.580003.492.3
        A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
        A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]905.850000.570.33
        A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
        A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]0
        A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
        A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]9
        A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
        A2P011: PVyesnonoyesnoyesno
        A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.541.24
        A2P011: Windnonononoyesnono
        A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Hydronononononoyesno
        A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]1.28
        A2P011: Biomass_elnonononononono
        A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
        A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P011: PVT_elnonononoyesyesno
        A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.28
        A2P011: Othernonononononono
        A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
        A2P012: Geothermalnononoyesnonoyes
        A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]5
        A2P012: Solar Thermalnonononononoyes
        A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Biomass_heatnonononoyesnoyes
        A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.1
        A2P012: Waste heat+HPnonononononoyes
        A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
        A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: PVT_thnononononoyesyes
        A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
        A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P012: Othernononononoyesno
        A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
        A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesConventional power generation: The university’s heat supply is designed as a local centralized heat supply system. Electrical power, generated in combined heat and power (CHP) units, is delivered to the distribution network and sold to energy traders as regulated by local legislation and norms. There are two natural gas burners acting as heat sources (3MW and 6MW capacity), and two CHP units (1.6MW and 0.45MW thermal capacity). All heating is supplied from the CHP plants. Renewable Energy Sources (RES): a wind turbine (3.6 kW) and PV panels (11.7 kW) are connected to the faculty microgrid. In the future it is planned to power the campus entirely from local RES.Geothermal heatpump systems, Waste heat from data centers
        A2P014: Annual energy use
        A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]11.3
        A2P015: Annual energy delivered
        A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]5.76
        A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
        A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]00
        A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
        A2P017: Gasnonononoyesnono
        A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
        A2P017: Coalnonononononono
        A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
        A2P017: Oilnonononononono
        A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]0
        A2P017: Othernonononononono
        A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
        A2P018: PVnonononononono
        A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Windnonononononono
        A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Hydrononononononono
        A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Biomass_elnonononononono
        A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
        A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
        A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
        A2P018: Othernononoyesnonono
        A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]5.26
        A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
        A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
        A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
        A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Biomass_heatnonononononono
        A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonononononono
        A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
        A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
        A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
        A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P019: Othernonononononono
        A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
        A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
        A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary0001.0532319391635000
        A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
        A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]0
        A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
        A2P022: Safety & Security
        A2P022: Health
        A2P022: Education
        A2P022: MobilityImproved accessibility to V2G-related transport options, focusing on inclusivity and equitable adoption in urban districts
        A2P022: EnergyTarget zero greenhouse gas emissions through the adoption of EVs with V2G capabilities, aiming to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and enhance local grid stabilityYesOn-site energy ratio
        A2P022: Water
        A2P022: Economic developmentDevelopment of viable business models for V2G that allow decentralized energy markets to integrate with the grid, enhancing local economic resilience
        A2P022: Housing and Community
        A2P022: Waste
        A2P022: Other
        A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
        A2P023: Photovoltaicsnoyesyesyesnoyesyes
        A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnononononoyesyes
        A2P023: Wind Turbinesnoyesnonononono
        A2P023: Geothermal energy systemnononoyesnonoyes
        A2P023: Waste heat recoverynononoyesnonoyes
        A2P023: Waste to energynonononononoyes
        A2P023: Polygenerationnonononononono
        A2P023: Co-generationnonononononono
        A2P023: Heat Pumpnononononoyesyes
        A2P023: Hydrogennonononononono
        A2P023: Hydropower plantnononononoyesno
        A2P023: Biomassnonononononono
        A2P023: Biogasnonononononono
        A2P023: OtherBatteries
        A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
        A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)nonoyesyesyesyesyes
        A2P024: Energy management systemnoyesyesyesyesyesyes
        A2P024: Demand-side managementnoyesnonoyesyesyes
        A2P024: Smart electricity gridnoyesnoyesyesnono
        A2P024: Thermal Storagenononoyesyesnoyes
        A2P024: Electric Storagenoyesnoyesyesnoyes
        A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnonononoyesnoyes
        A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnonononoyesnoyes
        A2P024: P2P – buildingsnonoyesnonoyesno
        A2P024: Other
        A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
        A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnoyesnononoyesno
        A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnononononoyesyes
        A2P025: High-performance new buildingsnononoyesnonoyes
        A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)noyesyesyesnonoyes
        A2P025: Urban data platformsnoyesyesnoyesyesyes
        A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnonononoyesnono
        A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)nononoyesyesnono
        A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononononono
        A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonononononono
        A2P025: Smart surveillancenonononononono
        A2P025: Other
        A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
        A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)noyesnononoyesno
        A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)noyesnoyesnonono
        A2P026: e-Mobilitynoyesnoyesnoyesyes
        A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnononononoyesno
        A2P026: Car-free areanonononononono
        A2P026: OtherLocal transportation hub with direct connection to metro & bus terminal; parking spaces for 1,400 bicycles and for 1,300 cars Promoting e-Mobility: 134 charging stations, A technical reservation for expanding EV charging system 1400 bicycle racks and charging cabinets for 10 e-bicycle batteries
        A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
        A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
        A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
        A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesNoYesYes
        A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance Certificate - in Greece it is mandatory in order to buy or rent a house or a dwellingEnergy Performance Certificate => Energy efficiency class B (2018 version)Energy Performance Certificate - in Spain it is mandatory in order to buy or rent a house or a dwelling)Energy Performance Certificate
        A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
        A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesYesNoNo
        A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesLEED (Core & Shell, v4) GOLD certification, Smart Building certification (GOLD)
        A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
        A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
        • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
        • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC)
        • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
        • New development strategies,
        • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
        • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
        • Smart cities strategies,
        • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC),
        • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
        • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
        • Smart cities strategies,
        • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.)
        • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
        • New development strategies,
        • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
        A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
        A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyRelevant city strategies behind PED development in Espoo include the following: - The Espoo Story: Sustainability is heavily included within the values and goals of the current Espoo city strategy, also known as the Espoo Story, running from 2021 to 2025. For example, the strategy names being a responsible pioneer as one of the main values of the city and has chosen achieving carbon neutrality by 2030 as one of the main goals of the current council term. In addition to the Espoo story, four cross-administrative development programmes act as cooperation platforms that allow the city, together with its partners, to develop innovative solutions through experiments and pilot projects in line with the Espoo Story. The Sustainable Espoo development programme is one of the four programmes, thus putting sustainability on the forefront in city development work. - EU Mission: 100 climate-neutral and smart cities by 2030: Cities selected for the Mission commit to achieving carbon-neutrality in 2030. A key tool in the Mission is the Climate City Contract. Each selected city will prepare and implement its contracts in collaboration with local businesses as well as other stakeholders and residents. - Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy: Espoo is committed to the Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy, under which the signatories commit to supporting the European Union’s 40% greenhouse gas emission reduction goal by 2030. The Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP) is a key instrument for implementing the agreement. The Action Plan outlines the key measures the city will take to achieve its carbon neutrality goal. The plan also includes a mapping of climate change risks and vulnerabilities, adaptation measures, emission calculations, emission reduction scenarios and impact estimations of measures. The SECAP of the City of Espoo is available here (only available in Finnish). - UN Sustainable development Goals: The city of Espoo has committed to becoming a forerunner and achieving the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) by 2025. The goal is to make Espoo financially, ecologically, socially, and culturally sustainable. - The Circular Cities Declaration: At the end of 2020, Espoo signed the Europe-wide circular economy commitment Circular Cities Declaration. The ten goals of the declaration promote the implementation of the city’s circular economy. - Espoo Clean Heat: Fortum and the City of Espoo are committed to producing carbon-neutral district heating in the network operating in the areas of Espoo, Kauniainen and Kirkkonummi during the 2020s. The district heating network provides heating to some 250,000 end-users in homes and offices. Coal will be completely abandoned in the production of district heating by 2025. The main targets related to PED development included in the noted city strategies are the following: - Espoo will achieve carbon neutrality by 2030. To be precise, this carbon neutrality goal is defined as an 80% emission reduction from the 1990 level by the year 2030. The remaining 20% share can be absorbed in carbon sinks or compensated by other means. - District heating in Espoo will be carbon-neutral by 2029, and coal-based production will be phased out from district heating by 2025. - Espoo aims to end the use of fossil fuels in the heating of city-owned buildings by 2025. - Quantitative goals within the Espoo SECAP report: - Espoo aims to reduce total energy consumption within the municipal sector by 7.5% by the end of 2025 in comparison to the 2015 level. The social housing company Espoon Asunnot OY aims to meet the same target. - Espoo aims to cover 10% of the energy consumption of new buildings via on-site production. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of cycling to 15% by 2024. - Espoo aims to raise the modal split of public transport by 1.1% yearly. - Espoo aims to reduce the emissions of bus transport by 90% by the end of 2025, when compared to 2010 levels.
        A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
        A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
        • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
        • Electrification of Cooking Methods,
        • Biogas
        A3P003: Other
        A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
        A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities- Citycon (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) aims to be carbon neutral in its energy use by 2030 - Lippulaiva is a unique urban centre with state-of-the-art energy concept. The centre has a smart managing system, which allows for example the temporary reduction of power used in air conditioning and charging stations when energy consumption is at its peak. In addition, a backup generator and a large electric battery will balance the operation of the electricity network. - Lippulaiva is also an important mobility hub for the people of Espoo. Espoonlahti metro station is located under the centre, and the West Metro started to operate to Espoonlahti in December 2022. Lippulaiva also has a bus terminal, which serves the metro’s feeder traffic in the Espoonlahti major district.
        A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
        A3P005: Sustainable behaviourFor Citycon, it was important to engage local people within the Lippulaiva project. During the construction period as well as after opening of the shopping center, citizens have been engaged in multiple ways, such as informing local citizens of the progress of construction, engaging young people in the design processes of the shopping centre and long-term commitment of youngsters with Lippulaiva Buddy class initiative. Users’ engagement activities are conducted in close co-operation with SPARCS partners.In Groningen we are working with different sustainable behaviours approaches and also developed the Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA). Currently, there are two different approaches in use in the municipality of Groningen: the District energy approach (Wijkgerichte aanpak, developed by the Municipality of Groningen) and the Cooperative approach (Coöperative Aanpak, developed by Grunneger Power). Based upon those approaches and knowledge that is gained through social research executed by TNO and HUAS the new Unified Citizen Engagement Approach (UCEA) has been developed.
        A3P006: Economic strategies
        A3P006: Economic strategies
        • Innovative business models,
        • Local trading,
        • Existing incentives
        • Local trading,
        • Existing incentives
        • Innovative business models
        • Open data business models,
        • Innovative business models,
        • Demand management Living Lab
        • Innovative business models,
        • Blockchain
        A3P006: Other
        A3P007: Social models
        A3P007: Social models
        • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
        • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
        • Social incentives,
        • Prevention of energy poverty,
        • Digital Inclusion
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
        • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies
        • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
        • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
        • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
        • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
        • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
        • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
        • Citizen Social Research,
        • Prevention of energy poverty,
        • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
        A3P007: Other
        A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
        A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
        • Strategic urban planning,
        • District Energy plans
        • Building / district Certification
        • Digital twinning and visual 3D models
        • Strategic urban planning,
        • City Vision 2050,
        • SECAP Updates
        • Strategic urban planning,
        • District Energy plans,
        • City Vision 2050,
        • SECAP Updates
        A3P008: Other
        A3P009: Environmental strategies
        A3P009: Environmental strategies
        • Energy Neutral,
        • Low Emission Zone,
        • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
        • Low Emission Zone
        • Other
        • Energy Neutral
        • Energy Neutral
        A3P009: OtherCarbon free in terms of energy
        A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
        A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects- Energy efficiency regulations (Directive 2006/32/EC and 2009/72/EC) - EU directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings => all new buildings should be “nearly zero-energy buildings” (nZEB) from 2021At national/regional/local level a legislation on PEDs development is not yet available in the Netherlands. There will be a new Environmental Act and Heat Act in the nearby future. We are working on a paper about the current legal barriers, which are in short for Groningen:  Lack of legal certainty and clarity with regard to the energy legislation.  Lack of coherence between policy and legislation from different ministries.  The planned revision of the Dutch Heat Law prevents Groningen from effectively realizing sustainable heat transition plans and goals.  Lack of capacity on the distribution grid for electricity
        B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
        B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionLippulaiva is a project with high level goal in terms of energy efficiency, energy flexibility and energy production.ExPEDite aims at creating and deploying a novel digital twin, allowing for real-time monitoring, visualization and management of district-level energy flows. Cities consume 65% of the world’s energy supply and are responsible for 70% of the CO² emissions, hence sharing a lot of the responsibility for climate change. We are faced with the challenge of redesigning our existing cities to make them more sustainable, resilient, inclusive and safe. Developing Positive Energy Districts (PEDs), is a breakthrough way to deal with the issue of urban emissions and applying adaptation and mitigation strategies to climate change, while ensuring that these urban areas generate an annual surplus of renewable energy and net zero greenhouse gas emissions. PEDs must address environmental, economic and social issues, providing solutions to energy consumption, production, emissions, transport & mobility and livability. By constantly monitoring and evaluating parameters through existing and/or novel sensor systems (e.g., renewable energy production/supply, transport conditions, air quality, energy demand, meteorological conditions, etc.), unconventional techniques may be applied to provide more sustainable options for the district’s needs.
        B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
        B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development- Citycon’s (developer and owner of Lippulaiva) target is to be carbon neutral by 2030 - Increasing sustainability requirements from the financing, tenants, cities, other stakeholdersExpected outcome 1 Increased number of (tangible) city planning actions for positive clean energy districts using the (proto-)PED design, development and management digital twin tools (based on pre-market research learnings) using open-standards based components which can be reused elsewhere. 2 Increased integration of existing smaller scale management systems (e.g. Building management systems) with open-standards based operational city platforms using sectorial data (e.g. building data, mobility, urban planning, etc.). 3 Enhanced data gathering approaches with identification of relevant multidimensional data sets (e.g. meteorological, load profile, social, geo-spatial, etc.) high-resolution real-time data streams (e.g. renewable energy production, energy consumption), and relevant forecasting data, drawing also on the work of common European data spaces. 4 Increased number of city planning departments / approaches using common data and (replicable) elements and processes. 5 Consolidated city sensor network specifications, complemented by appropriate data gathering approaches for soft data. 6 Improved performance of AI based self-learning systems for optimization of positive clean energy districts and bottom-up complex models. 7 Enhanced innovation capacity of local/regional administrations and accelerated uptake of shared, smart and sustainable zero emission solutions.
        B1P003: Environment of the case study area
        B2P003: Environment of the case study areaUrban areaUrban areaUrban area
        B1P004: Type of district
        B2P004: Type of district
        • New construction
        • New construction,
        • Renovation
        B1P005: Case Study Context
        B1P005: Case Study Context
        • Re-use / Transformation Area,
        • New Development
        • Re-use / Transformation Area,
        • Retrofitting Area,
        • Preservation Area
        B1P006: Year of construction
        B1P006: Year of construction2022
        B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
        B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
        B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
        B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
        B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
        B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
        B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
        B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
        B1P011: Population density before intervention
        B1P011: Population density before intervention0000000
        B1P012: Population density after intervention
        B1P012: Population density after intervention0000000
        B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
        B1P013: Residentialnononononoyesno
        B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Officenonononononono
        B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
        B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Commercialnononoyesnonono
        B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Institutionalnonononononono
        B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Natural areasnononoyesnonono
        B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Recreationalnonononononono
        B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Dismissed areasnonononononono
        B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P013: Othernononononoyesno
        B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
        B1P014: Residentialnononoyesnoyesno
        B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Officenonononononono
        B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonononononono
        B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Commercialnononoyesnonono
        B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Institutionalnonononononono
        B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Natural areasnonononononono
        B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Recreationalnonononononono
        B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononononono
        B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B1P014: Othernononononoyesno
        B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
        B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
        B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionGroningen was selected as Lighthouse City for the MAKING-CITY project. MAKING-CITY is a 60-month Horizon 2020 project launched in December 2018. It aims to address and demonstrate the urban energy system transformation towards smart and low-carbon cities, based on the Positive Energy District (PED) concept. The PED operational models developed in MAKING-CITY will help European and other cities around the world to adopt a long-term City Vision 2050 for energy transition and sustainable urbanisation whilst turning citizens into actors of this transformation. Groningen works with two PED districts in two completely different neighbourhoods in terms of structure and buildings. This is why we see this as a lab: to see wat works and what doesn’t. In order to be able to implement this in the rest of the city.
        B2P002: Installation life time
        B2P002: Installation life timeThe MAKING-CITY project lasts from November 2018 – November 2023. By that time PED North and PED South East are a fact.
        B2P003: Scale of action
        B2P003: ScaleDistrict
        B2P004: Operator of the installation
        B2P004: Operator of the installationThe Municipality of Groningen is Manager of the lab but works closely with other parties such as the university, university of applied sciences, research institute TNO and several other parties.
        B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
        B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materialsGroningen does not have a strategy to reuse and recyle materials
        B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
        B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?No
        B2P006: Other
        B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
        B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
        • Civic
        B2P007: Other
        B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
        B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabMunicipality
        B2P008: Other
        B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
        B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
        • Academia,
        • Private,
        • Industrial,
        • Other
        B2P009: Otherresearch companies, monitoring company, ict company
        B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
        B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
        B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
        B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
        • Buildings,
        • Demand-side management,
        • Energy storage,
        • Energy networks,
        • Waste management,
        • Lighting,
        • E-mobility,
        • Information and Communication Technologies (ICT),
        • Social interactions,
        • Business models
        B2P011: Other
        B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
        B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
        • Tools for prototyping and modelling
        B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
        B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
        B2P014: Monitoring measures
        B2P014: Monitoring measures
        • Execution plan,
        • Available data,
        • Type of measured data,
        • Equipment,
        • Level of access
        B2P015: Key Performance indicators
        B2P015: Key Performance indicators
        • Energy,
        • Social,
        • Economical / Financial
        B2P016: Execution of operations
        B2P016: Execution of operations
        B2P017: Capacities
        B2P017: Capacities
        B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
        B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
        B2P019: Available tools
        B2P019: Available tools
        • Energy modelling,
        • Social models,
        • Business and financial models
        B2P019: Available tools
        B2P020: External accessibility
        B2P020: External accessibility
        C1P001: Unlocking Factors
        C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
        C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)
        C1P002: Driving Factors
        C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
        C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
        C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
        C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
        C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)Earthquakes due to gas extraction
        C1P003: Administrative barriers
        C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P003: Lack of public participation3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
        C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)
        C1P004: Policy barriers
        C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
        C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
        C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
        C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P005: Non-effective regulations4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
        C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
        C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
        C1P006: Environmental barriers
        C1P006: Environmental barriers
        C1P007: Technical barriers
        C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P007: Deficient planning3 - Moderately important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
        C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
        C1P007: Lack of well-defined process4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
        C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
        C1P008: Inertia4 - Important4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
        C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
        C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
        C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P008: Rebound effect4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
        C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors3 - Moderately important4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
        C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
        C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
        C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
        C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
        C1P010: Financial barriers
        C1P010: Hidden costs3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
        C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P010: Economic crisis3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P010: Risk and uncertainty4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
        C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
        C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
        C1P011: Market barriers
        C1P011: Split incentives4 - Important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
        C1P011: Energy price distortion5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)5 - Very important4 - Important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
        C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
        C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
        C1P012: Stakeholders involved
        C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        • Planning/leading
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        C1P012: Research & Innovation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Financial/Funding
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Planning/leading,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Business process management
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Planning/leading
        C1P012: Urban Services providers
        • None
        • Planning/leading,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Real Estate developers
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Construction/implementation
        • Construction/implementation
        C1P012: Design/Construction companies
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        • Construction/implementation
        • Construction/implementation
        C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • None
        C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation
        • Design/demand aggregation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation
        C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        • Construction/implementation
        • Planning/leading,
        • Design/demand aggregation,
        • Construction/implementation,
        • Monitoring/operation/management
        C1P012: Other
        C1P012: Other (if any)
        Summary

        Authors (framework concept)

        Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

        Contributors (to the content)

        Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

        Implemented by

        Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
        Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

        Join the Action

        PED-EU-NET is an open, interdisciplinary and growing network welcoming academics, practitioners and relevant stakeholders to contribute to the activities of the work plan.
        Join Now

        COST

        COST is an EU funding programme that enables researchers to set up their interdisciplinary research networks in Europe and beyond. We provide funds for organising conferences, meetings, training schools, short scientific exchanges or other networking activities in a wide range of scientific topics. By creating open spaces where people and ideas can grow, we unlock the full potential of science.

        PED-EU-NET

        The COST Action Positive Energy Districts European Network (PED-EU-NET) aims to mobilise researchers and other relevant stakeholders across different domains and sectors to drive the deployment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Europe through open sharing of knowledge, exchange of ideas, pooling of resources, experimentation of new methods and co-creation of novel solutions.

        Action Details

        Grant Holder
        Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome

        Start of Action: 10 September 2020
        End of Action: 09 September 2024
        CSO approval date: 24/03/2020

        © 2021-2023 PED-EU-NET COST Action CA19126. All rights reserved.