Search
Close this search box.
Search
Map View
Table View
Projects
Filters:
Clear Filters Export All Entries (CSV)
NameProjectTypeCompare
Örebro-Vivalla JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Tiurberget, Kongsvinger JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Texel JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hällefors, Sweden JUST PEPP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cerdanyola del Valles, School of Engineering, Campus Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Bucharest, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies (ASE) PED Lab OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Pamplona OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Trondheim, Svartlamon OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Savona, The University of Genova, Savona Campus OPEN4CEC PED Lab Compare
Torres Vedras, Encosta de São Vicente COPPER PED Lab Compare
Malmö, Stadium area (Stadionområdet) PED StepWise PED Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Utrecht Science Park PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Kriegerheimstätten PED StepWise PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, 16. District, Leben am Wilhelminenberg HeatCOOP PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vienna, Laxenburgerstraße AH HeatCOOP PED Lab Compare
Tartu, Annelinn V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Utrecht, Kanaleneiland V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aveiro, Aradas district V2G-QUESTS PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Győr Geothermal District Heating Project PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Jacobs Borchs Gate, Drammen PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Dietenbach, Freiburg im Breisgau PED Relevant Case Study Compare
SmartEnCity, Lecce SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study Compare
STARDUST, Trento STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Klimatkontrakt Hyllie, Malmö PED Relevant Case Study Compare
EnStadt:Pfaff, Kaiserslautern PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
mySMARTlife, Helsinki PED Relevant Case Study Compare
REPLICATE (pilot action in the Novoli-Cascine district on “le PIagge” buildings), Firenze PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sinfonia, Bolzano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hunziker Areal, Zürich PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Hammarby Sjöstad 2.0, PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Sharing Cities, Milano PED Relevant Case Study Compare
District Heating Pozo Barredo, Mieres PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Cityfied (demo Linero), Lund PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Smart Otaniemi, Espoo PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zukunftsquartier, Vienna PED Case Study Compare
Santa Chiara Open Lab, Trento PED Case Study Compare
Barrio La Pinada, Paterna PED Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Zero Village Bergen (ZVB) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Võru +CityxChange PED Case Study Compare
NTNU Campus within the Knowledge Axis, Trondheim ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Furuset project, Oslo ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Laser Valley – Land of Lights PED Case Study Compare
Ydalir project ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
NyBy – Ny Flyplass (New City – New Airport) ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fornebu, Bærum ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Case Study Compare
Fleuraye west, Carquefou PED Case Study Compare
Smart Energy Åland PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED ASCEND – Accelerate poSitive Clean ENergy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Romania, Alba Iulia PED InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Munich, Harthof district PED Case Study Compare
Lublin MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Roubaix, MustBe0 – Résidence Philippe le Hardi – 125 Rue d’Oran CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Bærum, Eiksveien 116 CULTURAL-E – Climate and cultural-based solutions for Plus Energy Buildings PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Findhorn, the Park InterPED – INTERoperable cloud-based solution for cross-vector planning and management of Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study Compare
Amsterdam, Buiksloterham PED ATELIER – AmsTErdam BiLbao cItizen drivEn smaRt cities PED Case Study Compare
Schönbühel-Aggsbach, Schönbühel an der Donau PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Umeå, Ålidhem district PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Compare
Aalborg East PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Ankara, Çamlık District PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Trenčín MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Luxembourg, Betzdorf LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Vantaa, Aviapolis NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Uncompare
Vidin, Himik and Bononia MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Oslo, Verksbyen Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Uden, Loopkantstraat Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Relevant Case Study Uncompare
Zaragoza, Actur NEUTRALPATH – Pathway towards Climate-Neutrality through low risky and fully replicable Positive Clean Energy Districts PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Aarhus, Brabrand BIPED – Building Intelligent Positive Energy Districts PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Riga, Ķīpsala, RTU smart student city ExPEDite – Enabling Positive Energy Districts through Digital Twins PED Case Study Compare
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Case Study Uncompare
Istanbul, Ozyegin University Campus LEGOFIT – Adaptable technological solutions based on early design actions for the construction and renovation of Energy Positive Homes PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Espoo, Kera SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study / PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Borlänge, Rymdgatan’s Residential Portfolio PED-ACT – Auto characterization of PEDs for digital references towards iterative process optimisation PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Freiburg, Waldsee PED urban – Development of methods and tools for accounting, planning and operation of climate-neutral district PED Case Study Compare
Innsbruck, Campagne-Areal PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Graz, Reininghausgründe PED Case Study Compare
Stor-Elvdal, Campus Evenstad ZEN – Research Centre on Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Oulu, Kaukovainio MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Halmstad, Fyllinge PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Lund, Brunnshög district PED Case Study Compare
Vienna, Am Kempelenpark PED Case Study Compare
Évora, Portugal POCITYF – A POsitive Energy CITY Transformation Framework PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Kladno, Sletiště (Sport Area), PED Winter Stadium SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Groningen, PED South MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Groningen, PED North MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Lab Compare
Maia, Sobreiro Social Housing SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Lab Compare
Lubia (Soria), CEDER-CIEMAT PED Lab Compare
Tampere, Ilokkaanpuisto district STARDUST – Holistic and Integrated Urban Model for Smart Cities PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Leon, Former Sugar Factory district MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Istanbul, Kadikoy district, Caferaga MAKING-CITY – Energy efficient pathway for the city transformation: enabling a positive future PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Leppävaara district, Sello center SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Espoo, Espoonlahti district, Lippulaiva block SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Salzburg, Gneis district Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Uncompare
Barcelona, Santa Coloma de Gramenet Syn.ikia – Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods PED Case Study Compare
Tartu, City centre area SmartEnCity – Towards Smart Zero CO2 Cities across Europe PED Relevant Case Study / PED Lab Compare
Bologna, Pilastro-Roveri district GRETA – GReen Energy Transition Actions PED Relevant Case Study Compare
Barcelona, SEILAB & Energy SmartLab PED Lab Compare
Leipzig, Baumwollspinnerei district SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Case Study Compare
Kifissia, Energy community SPARCS – Sustainable energy Positive & zero cARbon CommunitieS PED Relevant Case Study
TitleKifissia, Energy community
Aalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, Denmark
«×»
Vantaa, Aviapolis
«×»
Uden, Loopkantstraat
«×»
Aveiro, Aradas district
«×»
Salzburg, Gneis district
«×»
Izmir, District of Karşıyaka
«×»
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P001: Name of the PED case study / PED LabKifissia, Energy communityAalborg East, Aalborg Municipality, Region of Northern Jutland, DenmarkVantaa, AviapolisUden, LoopkantstraatAveiro, Aradas districtSalzburg, Gneis districtIzmir, District of Karşıyaka
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P002: Map / aerial view / photos / graphic details / leaflet
A1P003: Categorisation of the PED site
PED case studynonoyesnonoyesyes
PED relevant case studyyesyesyesyesyesnono
PED Lab.noyesyesnononono
A1P004: Targets of the PED case study / PED Lab
Climate neutralitynoyesyesyesyesyesyes
Annual energy surplusnononoyesnoyesyes
Energy communityyesnononoyesyesno
Circularitynonoyesnononono
Air quality and urban comfortyesnonononoyesyes
Electrificationyesnonoyesyesnono
Net-zero energy costnonononononoyes
Net-zero emissionnonononononono
Self-sufficiency (energy autonomous)nonononononono
Maximise self-sufficiencynoyesnonononoyes
Othernonononononono
Other (A1P004)
A1P005: Phase of the PED case study / PED Lab
A1P005: Project Phase of your case study/PED LabPlanning PhasePlanning PhasePlanning PhaseIn operationPlanning PhaseCompletedPlanning Phase
A1P006: Start Date
A1P006: Start date11/2201/2306/1712/2301/2010/22
A1P007: End Date
A1P007: End date11/2512/2705/2311/2601/2410/25
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P008: Reference Project
A1P009: Data availability
A1P009: Data availability
  • Monitoring data available within the districts,
  • GIS open datasets
  • General statistical datasets,
  • GIS open datasets
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
  • Monitoring data available within the districts
A1P009: OtherOther
A1P010: Sources
Any publication, link to website, deliverable referring to the PED/PED Lab
    • Inger Andresen, Tonje Healey Trulsrud, Luca Finocchiaro, Alessandro Nocente, Meril Tamm, Joana Ortiz, Jaume Salom, Abel Magyari, Linda Hoes-van Oeffelen, Wouter Borsboom, Wim Kornaat, Niki Gaitani, Design and performance predictions of plus energy neighbourhoods – Case studies of demonstration projects in four different European climates, Energy and Buildings, Volume 274, 2022, 112447, ISSN 0378-7788, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112447. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778822006181),
    • Deliverable, Report: Integrated Energy Design for Sustainable Plus Energy Neighbourhoods (syn.ikia),
    • Deliverable, Report: DEMONSTRATION CASE OF SUSTAINABLE PLUS ENERGY NEIGHBOURHOODS IN MARINE CLIMATE (syn.ikia),
    • https://www.synikia.eu/no/bibliotek/
      A1P011: Geographic coordinates
      X Coordinate (longitude):23.81458810.00724.9588215.6191-8.659513.04121627.110049
      Y Coordinate (latitude):38.07734957.04102860.30548851.660640.635347.77101938.496054
      A1P012: Country
      A1P012: CountryGreeceDenmarkFinlandNetherlandsPortugalAustriaTurkey
      A1P013: City
      A1P013: CityMunicipality of KifissiaAalborgVantaaUdenAlveiro (Aradas)Salzburgİzmir
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification)
      A1P014: Climate Zone (Köppen Geiger classification).CsaDfbDfbCfbCsbDfbCsa
      A1P015: District boundary
      A1P015: District boundaryVirtualVirtualGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographicGeographic
      OtherThe energy will be produced by a PV plant installed on the terrace of a municipal building. Members of the energy community (that is under formation) will benefit from the energy produced via virtual net metering. PV instalment and the buildings (owned by the members of the community) will be within the boundaries of the Municipality but not necessary in the same area/district/neighbourhood
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab
      A1P016: Ownership of the case study/PED Lab:PublicMixedPrivatePublicMixedPrivate
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure
      A1P017: Ownership of the land / physical infrastructure:Multiple OwnersMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple OwnersSingle OwnerMultiple Owners
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED
      A1P018: Number of buildings in PED11721
      A1P019: Conditioned space
      A1P019: Conditioned space [m²]2360199762102795
      A1P020: Total ground area
      A1P020: Total ground area [m²]3130800038810003860893000032600
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area
      A1P021: Floor area ratio: Conditioned space / total ground area0001003
      A1P022: Financial schemes
      A1P022a: Financing - PRIVATE - Real estatenonoyesyesnonono
      A1P022a: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]7804440
      A1P022b: Financing - PRIVATE - ESCO schemenonononononono
      A1P022b: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022c: Financing - PRIVATE - Othernonoyesnononono
      A1P022c: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022d: Financing - PUBLIC - EU structural fundingnonononononono
      A1P022d: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022e: Financing - PUBLIC - National fundingnonononoyesnono
      A1P022e: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022f: Financing - PUBLIC - Regional fundingnonononononono
      A1P022f: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022g: Financing - PUBLIC - Municipal fundingnonoyesnononono
      A1P022g: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022h: Financing - PUBLIC - Othernonononononono
      A1P022h: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022i: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - EUnonoyesnonoyesyes
      A1P022i: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]1193355
      A1P022j: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Nationalnoyesnonononoyes
      A1P022j: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022k: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Local/regionalnonononononono
      A1P022k: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022l: Financing - RESEARCH FUNDING - Othernonononononono
      A1P022l: Add the value in EUR if available [EUR]
      A1P022: OtherMultiple different funding schemes depending on the development site within the District and Lab.
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      A1P023: Economic Targets
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local businesses,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local businesses,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      • Positive externalities,
      • Other
      • Positive externalities,
      • Boosting local and sustainable production
      A1P023: OtherBoosting social cooperation and social aid
      A1P024: More comments:
      A1P024: More comments:The project is a follow-up from the “Social Beautiful” concept which was developed in collaboration between Labyrint (Support in sheltered housing), Area (housing company), the municipality of Uden, and Hendriks Coppelmans (developer). The concept aims to provide an answer to changes in various policy areas and the changing demands of society. The Social Beautiful concept consists of the following elements: 1. Living, working, and community services are brought together in one location. A multifunctional residential and service centre is being realized at the location. 2. Housing is shaped by the realization of financially accessible homes suitable for the target group. The housing design is tailored to the target group. it may also include sheltered / protected living. 3. Work takes place at the location or from the same location. The work has a social function within the neighbourhood. Wage-related work must contribute to providing structure in the daily activities of the residents. 4. Neighbourhood management is organized from the location in the surrounding neighbourhood. A service package is provided from the residential and service centre that contributes to the ability of neighbourhood residents to live independently for longer, to strengthen the social network, and to improve the quality of life and safety in the neighbourhood. 5. The houses are suitable for use at all times for regular rental. Communal facilities must be realized within the contours of a regular apartment. The objective is to offer a suitable living and working situation to a group of vulnerable citizens. In this way they become a fully-fledged part of society. They not only make use of the facilities themselves, but also give substance to the level of facilities in the municipality. Due to the integrated approach, they experience a greater sense of well-being and security.
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs
      A1P025: Estimated PED case study / PED LAB costs [mil. EUR]7804440
      Contact person for general enquiries
      A1P026: NameArtemis Giavasoglou, Kleopatra KalampokaKristian OlesenEira LinkoTonje Healey TrulsrudDr. Gonçalo Homem De Almeida Rodriguez CorreiaAbel MagyariOzlem Senyol
      A1P027: OrganizationMunicipality of Kifissia – SPARCS local teamAalborg UniversityCity of VantaaNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)Delft University of TechnologyABUDKarsiyaka Municipality
      A1P028: AffiliationMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public BodiesResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityResearch Center / UniversityMunicipality / Public Bodies
      A1P028: Other
      A1P029: Emailgiavasoglou@kifissia.grKristian@plan.aau.dkeira.linko@vantaa.fitonje.h.trulsrud@ntnu.nog.correia@tudelft.nlmagyari.abel@abud.huozlemkocaer2@gmail.com
      Contact person for other special topics
      A1P030: NameStavros Zapantis - vice mayorAlex Søgaard MorenoQiaochu FanStrassl IngeborgHasan Burak Cavka
      A1P031: Emailstavros.zapantis@gmail.comasm@aalborg.dkq.fan-1@tudelft.nlinge.strassl@salzburg.gv.athasancavka@iyte.edu.tr
      Pursuant to the General Data Protection RegulationYesYesYesYesYesYes
      A2P001: Fields of application
      A2P001: Fields of application
      • Energy production
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
      • Digital technologies
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • E-mobility,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
      • Digital technologies,
      • Construction materials,
      • Other
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • Waste management,
      • Indoor air quality,
      • Construction materials
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • E-mobility,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.),
      • Digital technologies
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production
      • Energy efficiency,
      • Energy flexibility,
      • Energy production,
      • Urban comfort (pollution, heat island, noise level etc.)
      A2P001: Other
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fields
      A2P002: Tools/strategies/methods applied for each of the above-selected fieldsStakeholder engagement, expert energy system analysis, future scenariosPilot collaboration with landowners. Carbon footprint assessment and planning guidelines in zoning planning. Green infrastructure requirements. Examples of considered energy solutions: waste heat recovery and utilization, geothermal, air-water heat pumps, district heating return water, photovoltaics, A-class energy efficiency, smart control and monitoring, energy storages, E-mobility above national requirements, coolingEnergy efficiency: Energy efficient envelope, with good insulation, triple glazing windows and airtight envelope. (EPC = 0) Energy Flexibility: MCP controls for the heat pump in the apartments. Energy production: PV panels on the roof, Ground source heat pumps Waste management: construction waste was kept to a minimum and sorted and collected separately as much as possible. Indoor air quality: Exhaust ventilation and opening of windows Construction materials: low carbon emission building materials- Dynamic district, and building scale energy modelling - Microclimate modelling - Klimaaktiv certification system - Energy community - Flexibility with shared heating and electricity systemsMethods involve studying the feasibility of digital PED references for the case cities about their energy, environmental, and economic performance by EnergyPlus tool. In case of insufficient energy data and the need of high resolution data, ‘Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm’ and ‘time-series decomposition-recombination’ method will be used to supplement data to EnergyPlus. The feasibility results will be returned to stakeholders for iterative discussion, and the iterative results will be used to update digital references. Replication plans are developed based on such a cooperation process for strategies to implement PEDs. If a PED is demonstrated during the project period, the measured data will be used to verify the feasibility model to optimize previous results (WP7– R3 & R4). In the MAKING-CITY project, the overall PED design method is developed, which will be further optimised in this project. In addition, PED-ACT will use the methods and knowledge, including how to choose a suitable PED in a city, energy balance calculation, and technologies available for PED. The RUGGEDISED project outputs the governance model into the replication plan in PED-ACT. Its ‘smart city open-data decision platform’ will illustrate an excellent example for the database in PED-ACT. The IEA EBC Annex 83 and Cost Action 19126 create the basis for data collection, developing existing PED databases, characterization of PED, and review of regulations of PED, as well as development of simulation tools. The UBEM project further enables a detailed high-resolution energy balance calculation of PED.
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000
      A2P003: Application of ISO52000NoNoYesYesYes
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P004: Appliances included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNoYes
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balance
      A2P005: Mobility included in the calculation of the energy balanceNoNoNoNo
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculation
      A2P006: Description of how mobility is included (or not included) in the calculationLarge combined industrial, residential, and commercial area with complex flows of in- and outgoing traffic.The calculation of the energy balance will be further developed and specified under the Neutralpath-project. Mobility related emissions are taken into account in the carbon footprint calculation of each zoning plan in the development area.not includedMobility is not included in the calculations.
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand
      A2P007: Annual energy demand in buildings / Thermal demand [GWh/annum]2180.1483.862
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand
      A2P008: Annual energy demand in buildings / Electric Demand [GWh/annum]1480.1091.226
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility
      A2P009: Annual energy demand for e-mobility [GWh/annum]
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure
      A2P010: Annual energy demand for urban infrastructure [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Annual renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P011: PVyesnoyesyesnoyesyes
      A2P011: PV - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]0.0580.77706641.028
      A2P011: Windnoyesnonononono
      A2P011: Wind - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Hydrononononononono
      A2P011: Hydro - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_elnonononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
      A2P011: Biomass_peat_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: PVT_elnonononononono
      A2P011: PVT_el - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P011: Othernoyesnonononono
      A2P011: Other - specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Annual renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P012: Geothermalnonoyesyesnoyesno
      A2P012 - Geothermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Solar Thermalnonononononono
      A2P012 - Solar Thermal: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_heatnonononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Waste heat+HPnoyesyesnononono
      A2P012 - Waste heat+HP: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]300
      A2P012: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: PVT_thnonononononono
      A2P012 - PVT_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
      A2P012 - Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P012: Othernonononononono
      A2P012 - Other: Please specify production in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notes
      A2P013: Renewable resources on-site - Additional notesVery little wind production currently exists in the area. The electricity production of the waste incineration plant will be included at a later date. Aalborg East is partly a remarkable area for hosting a Portland cement factory that accounts for a substantial share of Denmark’s total CO2 emissions. In turn, it also provides waste heat to the district heating grid for all of Aalborg city and some of the smaller towns that are connected to the same DH grid.*Annual energy use below is presentedin primary energy consumption
      A2P014: Annual energy use
      A2P014: Annual energy use [GWh/annum]6200.1940.8190165.088
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered
      A2P015: Annual energy delivered [GWh/annum]3990.0368
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year
      A2P016: Annual non-renewable electricity production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]-1
      A2P017: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year
      A2P017: Gasnonononononoyes
      A2P017 - Gas: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Coalnonononononono
      A2P017 - Coal: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Oilnonononononono
      A2P017 - Oil: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]
      A2P017: Othernoyesnonononono
      A2P017 - Other: Annual non-renewable thermal production on-site during target year [GWh/annum]300
      A2P018: Annual renewable electricity imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P018: PVnonoyesnononoyes
      A2P018 - PV: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]0.707
      A2P018: Windnonoyesnononono
      A2P018 - Wind: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Hydrononoyesnononono
      A2P018 - Hydro: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_elnonoyesnononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Biomass_peat_elnonononononono
      A2P018 - Biomass_peat_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: PVT_elnonononononono
      A2P018 - PVT_el: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P018: Othernonononononono
      A2P018 - Other: specify production in GWh/annum if available [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Annual renewable thermal imports from outside the boundary during target year
      A2P019: Geothermalnonononononono
      A2P019 Geothermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Solar Thermalnonononononono
      A2P019 Solar Thermal: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_heatnonoyesnononono
      A2P019 Biomass_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Waste heat+HPnonoyesnononono
      A2P019 Waste heat+HP: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_peat_heatnonononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_peat_heat: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: PVT_thnonononononono
      A2P019 PVT_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Biomass_firewood_thnonononononono
      A2P019 Biomass_firewood_th: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P019: Othernonononononono
      A2P019 Other: Please specify imports in GWh/annum [GWh/annum]
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary
      A2P020: Share of RES on-site / RES outside the boundary0000001.4540311173975
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED
      A2P021: GHG-balance calculated for the PED [tCO2/annum]-0.00043
      A2P022: KPIs related to the PED case study / PED Lab
      A2P022: Safety & SecurityPersonal Safety
      A2P022: HealthHealthy communityCO2) levels, Predicted Mean Vote,Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied, Temperature, Relative Humidity, Illuminance, Daylight factor, Sound pressure levels
      A2P022: Education
      A2P022: MobilitySustainable mobilityImproved accessibility to V2G-related transport options, focusing on inclusivity and equitable adoption in urban districts
      A2P022: EnergyNOn-renewable primary energy balance, renewable energy ratio, grid purchase factor, load cover factor/self-generation, supply cover factor/self-consumption, net energy/net power, peak delivered/peak expoted, total greenhouse gas emissionTarget zero greenhouse gas emissions through the adoption of EVs with V2G capabilities, aiming to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and enhance local grid stabilityNon-renewable primary energy balance, Renewable energy ratio, Grid Purchase factor, Load cover factor/Self-generation, Supply cover factor/Self-consumption, Net energy/Net power, Peak delivered/exported power, Connection capacity credit, Total greenhouse gas emissions
      A2P022: Water
      A2P022: Economic developmentcapital costs, operational cots, overall economic performance (5 KPIs)Development of viable business models for V2G that allow decentralized energy markets to integrate with the grid, enhancing local economic resilienceInvestment costs, Share of investments covered by grants, Maintenance-related costs, Requirement-related costs, Operation-related costs, Other costs, Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return, Economic Value Added, Payback Period, nZEB Cost Comparison
      A2P022: Housing and Communitydemographic composition, diverse community, social cohesionAccess to services, Affordability of energy, Affordability of housing, Democratic legitimacy, Living conditions, Social cohesion, Personal safety, Energy consciousness
      A2P022: Waste
      A2P022: OtherSmartness and flecibility, Indoor Environmental Quality, Social performance - Equity (affordable housing, access to servicees and amenitioes, afforability of energy, living conditions, sustinable mobility, universal design)
      A2P023: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Generation
      A2P023: Photovoltaicsnoyesyesyesyesyesyes
      A2P023: Solar thermal collectorsnoyesnonononono
      A2P023: Wind Turbinesnonononoyesnono
      A2P023: Geothermal energy systemnonoyesyesnoyesno
      A2P023: Waste heat recoverynoyesyesnononono
      A2P023: Waste to energynoyesyesnononono
      A2P023: Polygenerationnonoyesnononono
      A2P023: Co-generationnonononononono
      A2P023: Heat Pumpnoyesyesyesnonoyes
      A2P023: Hydrogennonononononono
      A2P023: Hydropower plantnonononononono
      A2P023: Biomassnoyesyesnononono
      A2P023: Biogasnonononononono
      A2P023: OtherThe technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case.
      A2P024: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Flexibility
      A2P024: A2P024: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)nonoyesnononono
      A2P024: Energy management systemnoyesyesyesyesyesno
      A2P024: Demand-side managementnoyesyesyesyesyesno
      A2P024: Smart electricity gridnoyesyesnoyesyesno
      A2P024: Thermal Storagenoyesyesnononono
      A2P024: Electric Storagenoyesyesnoyesnono
      A2P024: District Heating and Coolingnoyesyesnononono
      A2P024: Smart metering and demand-responsive control systemsnoyesyesyesnonono
      A2P024: P2P – buildingsnononononoyesno
      A2P024: OtherThe technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case.
      A2P025: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Energy Efficiency
      A2P025: Deep Retrofittingnoyesnonoyesnoyes
      A2P025: Energy efficiency measures in historic buildingsnonononononono
      A2P025: High-performance new buildingsnonoyesyesnoyesno
      A2P025: Smart Public infrastructure (e.g. smart lighting)nonononoyesnono
      A2P025: Urban data platformsnonononoyesnono
      A2P025: Mobile applications for citizensnonononononono
      A2P025: Building services (HVAC & Lighting)nonoyesyesnoyesyes
      A2P025: Smart irrigationnonononononono
      A2P025: Digital tracking for waste disposalnonononononono
      A2P025: Smart surveillancenoyesnonononono
      A2P025: OtherThe technological solutions can vary within the PED Lab area and will be specified case by case.
      A2P026: Technological Solutions / Innovations - Mobility
      A2P026: Efficiency of vehicles (public and/or private)nonoyesnoyesnono
      A2P026: Measures to reduce traffic volume (e.g. measure to support public transportation, shared mobility, measure to reduce journeys and distances)nonoyesnoyesyesno
      A2P026: e-Mobilitynonoyesnoyesyesno
      A2P026: Soft mobility infrastructures and last mile solutionsnonoyesnononono
      A2P026: Car-free areanonononononono
      A2P026: Other
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notes
      A2P027: Mobility strategies - Additional notesShared mobility: a mobility point will be implemented and ensure the flexible use of different mobility services.
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificates
      A2P028: Energy efficiency certificatesYesYesYesYesNo
      A2P028: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesEnergy Performance Certificate - in Greece it is mandatory in order to buy or rent a house or a dwellingEPC = 0, energy neutral buildingEnergy Performance Certificate
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificates
      A2P029: Any other building / district certificatesNoNoYesNo
      A2P029: If yes, please specify and/or enter notesKlimaaktiv certificate, Greenpass certificate
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      A3P001: Relevant city /national strategy
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Promotion of energy communities (REC/CEC)
      • Smart cities strategies,
      • Urban Renewal Strategies,
      • New development strategies,
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • New development strategies,
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      • Energy master planning (SECAP, etc.),
      • Climate change adaption plan/strategy (e.g. Climate City contract),
      • National / international city networks addressing sustainable urban development and climate neutrality
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategy
      A3P002: Quantitative targets included in the city / national strategyReduction of 1018000 tons CO2 by 2030Carbon-Neutral Vantaa by 2030 (min. 80 % reduction of yearly emissions, capture or compensation os the residual 20 %),Karşıyaka Municipality is the first local government in Turkey to sign the Covenant of Mayors in 2011. During this period, the greenhouse gas inventory of the district was carried out three times and reduction targets were set for 2020 and 2030. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan prepared as of the end of 2021, Karşıyaka Municipality has targeted a 40% reduction in its emissions for 2030 compared to the base year 2018. In the 2021 Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan, Karşıyaka Municipality aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions from 3.96 tCO2e / person in 2018 to 2.37 tCO2e / person in 2030. System solutions such as the use of renewable energy sources, air, ground or water source heat pump, cogeneration and microcogeneration are analysed by designers in order to fully or partially meet the energy requirements for heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water, electricity and lighting for all buildings with a floor area of less than 20,000 square metres. If at least 50% of the building's total energy consumption costs are covered by one or more of these applications, the points are taken in the assessment table in the Building and housing estate business certification guide of 2023.
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      A3P003: Strategies towards decarbonization of the gas grid
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps,
      • Biogas
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
      • Electrification of Heating System based on Heat Pumps
      A3P003: Other
      A3P004: Identification of needs and priorities
      A3P004: Identification of needs and prioritiesDecarbonize part of Aalborg city as a way of working incrementally towards being a zero-emission city.According to the model developed for the district, the electrification of heating and cooling is necessary.Therefore, there needs to be the implementation of a heat pump. The building-integrated photovoltaic panelsshould follow. Through net-metering practices, the district is expected to reach energy positivity throughthis scenario.
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviour
      A3P005: Sustainable behaviour- Stakeholder engagement; - Focus on implementing renewable energy production where possible; - Rretrofitting and energy optimization of existing buildings.
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      A3P006: Economic strategies
      • Life Cycle Cost,
      • Circular economy models
      • Innovative business models,
      • PPP models,
      • Life Cycle Cost,
      • Circular economy models
      • Innovative business models,
      • Local trading,
      • Existing incentives
      • Innovative business models,
      • Local trading
      A3P006: Other
      A3P007: Social models
      A3P007: Social models
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Policy Forums,
      • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
      • Citizen Social Research,
      • Policy Forums,
      • Quality of Life,
      • Strategies towards social mix,
      • Affordability,
      • Prevention of energy poverty,
      • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance,
      • Educational activities and trainings (including capacity building towards technology literacy, energy efficient behaviour)
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Social incentives,
      • Quality of Life
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
      • Social incentives,
      • Prevention of energy poverty,
      • Digital Inclusion
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Behavioural Change / End-users engagement,
      • Social incentives,
      • Quality of Life,
      • Strategies towards social mix,
      • Affordability,
      • Citizen/owner involvement in planning and maintenance
      • Strategies towards (local) community-building,
      • Co-creation / Citizen engagement strategies,
      • Affordability
      A3P007: Other
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      A3P008: Integrated urban strategies
      • Strategic urban planning,
      • District Energy plans
      • Strategic urban planning,
      • SECAP Updates
      • Strategic urban planning,
      • District Energy plans
      • Building / district Certification
      • Digital twinning and visual 3D models,
      • District Energy plans,
      • SECAP Updates
      A3P008: Other
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      A3P009: Environmental strategies
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Net zero carbon footprint
      • Net zero carbon footprint,
      • Life Cycle approach,
      • Greening strategies,
      • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Nature Based Solutions (NBS)
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone
      • Energy Neutral,
      • Low Emission Zone,
      • Pollutants Reduction
      A3P009: Other
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspects
      A3P010: Legal / Regulatory aspectsCurrent energy tariffs disincentivize both individual and collective PV systems – meaning energy communities are not economically feasible, housing associations and public buildings struggle with finding a secure RoI for solar panels, and citizens and local industry lack an incentive to install solar panels on their own
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definition
      B1P001: PED/PED relevant concept definitionThe large scale provides interesting opportunities for both urban development and strategic energy planning; the diverse mix of buildings and functions also allow for interesting discussions regarding PEDs. Another interesting facet is that the district heating grid is almost fully supplied by waste heat.Neutralpath-project is working with the cocept of PCEDs = Positive and Clean Energy Districts (energy-efficient and energy-flexible districts with net zero greenhouse gas emissions and a surplus of renewable energy). Aviapolis Climate-Neutral Lab will work with both PCED and PCED relevant cases within the district.The demonstration projects is a new residential development, which consists of an apartment complex which includes 39 apartments spread over 3 floors. It is a sustainble plus energy neighbouhood, and has reached a plus energy balance on its first year in operation. It has MPC controls on the individual heat pumps to improve the energy flexibility of the apartments. It includes the "social beatiful" concepts with a strong emphasis on the social sustainability of the project.The pilot area was selected on the basis of several criteria: its location within areas prioritised by Karşıyaka Municipality for combating climate change, compliance with the building regulations set out in the Green Building-Site-Operation (2023) guide, which are in line with Municipality's energy policy, the presence of open spaces that allow various applications for renewable energy, proximity to public facilities such as schools and municipal services, the availability of data on energy consumption (e.g. electricity and natural gas bills) and architectural features, the potential for community building, the suitability for solar energy systems, considering orientation and roof structure, and the potential for future building renovations. The aim of the initiative is to explore the feasibility of transforming the district into a Positive Energy District (PED).
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project development
      B1P002: Motivation behind PED/PED relevant project developmentThe area has an interesting history of development and has recently undergone several urban improvements. This is coupled with a strong local network of business owners and other stakeholders, all with an interest in developing the area in the best way possible. This made for an interesting case from a planning perspective to investigate how this network would pick up on the concept of PED and whether they could see any potential utility in relation to their everyday experiences.According to Vantaa city strategy 2021-2025 Aviapolis area aims to become the greenest airport city in Europe. The district is transforming from a logistics and business focused area to a lively urban district which gives an opportunity to rethink the areas energy solutions. With Neutralpath-project Vantaa aims to support the development of the district's energy system and explore innovative, energy efficient and fossil free district energy solutions.The need for social housing and the ambition to create a great living environment with a high-performance apartment complex, supplied with renewable energy. It results in lower energy bills for the tenants and high-quality homes.
      B1P003: Environment of the case study area
      B2P003: Environment of the case study areaSuburban areaUrban areaSuburban areaSuburban areaUrban area
      B1P004: Type of district
      B2P004: Type of district
      • Renovation
      • New construction,
      • Renovation
      • New construction
      • New construction
      • Renovation
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      B1P005: Case Study Context
      • Retrofitting Area
      • Re-use / Transformation Area,
      • New Development
      • New Development
      • New Development
      • Retrofitting Area
      B1P006: Year of construction
      B1P006: Year of construction20242005
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential
      B1P007: District population before intervention - Residential16.931
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
      B1P008: District population after intervention - Residential
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
      B1P009: District population before intervention - Non-residential
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
      B1P010: District population after intervention - Non-residential
      B1P011: Population density before intervention
      B1P011: Population density before intervention0000000
      B1P012: Population density after intervention
      B1P012: Population density after intervention0000000
      B1P013: Building and Land Use before intervention
      B1P013: Residentialnonoyesnononoyes
      B1P013 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]102795
      B1P013: Officenonoyesnononono
      B1P013 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Industry and Utilitynonoyesnononono
      B1P013 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Commercialnonoyesnononono
      B1P013 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Institutionalnonoyesnononono
      B1P013 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Natural areasnononononoyesno
      B1P013 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Recreationalnonoyesnononono
      B1P013 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Dismissed areasnonoyesnononono
      B1P013 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P013: Othernonononononono
      B1P013 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Building and Land Use after intervention
      B1P014: Residentialnonoyesyesnoyesyes
      B1P014 - Residential: Specify the sqm [m²]2394102795
      B1P014: Officenonoyesnononono
      B1P014 - Office: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Industry and Utilitynonoyesnononono
      B1P014 - Industry and Utility: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Commercialnonoyesnononono
      B1P014 - Commercial: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Institutionalnonoyesnononono
      B1P014 - Institutional: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Natural areasnononononoyesno
      B1P014 - Natural areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Recreationalnonoyesnononono
      B1P014 - Recreational: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Dismissed areasnonononononono
      B1P014 - Dismissed areas: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B1P014: Othernonononononono
      B1P014 - Other: Specify the sqm [m²]
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definition
      B2P001: PED Lab concept definitionAn ongoing process and dialogue with local stakeholders to determine the future development of the area.Neutralpath-project is working with the cocept of PCEDs = Positive and Clean Energy Districts (energy-efficient and energy-flexible districts with net zero greenhouse gas emissions and a surplus of renewable energy). Aviapolis Climate-Neutral Lab will work with both PCED and PCED relevant cases within the district.
      B2P002: Installation life time
      B2P002: Installation life timeNo new installation will be made throughout the project. Rather the project will attempt to establish a local PED network with the aim of empowering the stakeholders to better engage with sustainable technologies.
      B2P003: Scale of action
      B2P003: ScaleDistrictDistrict
      B2P004: Operator of the installation
      B2P004: Operator of the installationKristian OlesenThe City of Vantaa manages the lab, working closely with landowners and other stakeholders such as energy companies, solution providers, universities and citizens.
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materials
      B2P005: Replication framework: Applied strategy to reuse and recycling the materialsReplication is primarily focused on the establishment of a local network with an interest in and understanding of PED.
      B2P006: Circular Economy Approach
      B2P006: Do you apply any strategy to reuse and recycling the materials?No
      B2P006: Other
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      B2P007: Motivation for developing the PED Lab
      • Civic
      • Strategic
      B2P007: Other
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED Lab
      B2P008: Lead partner that manages the PED LabResearch center/UniversityMunicipality
      B2P008: Other
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      B2P009: Collaborative partners that participate in the PED Lab
      • Academia,
      • Private
      • Academia,
      • Private,
      • Industrial,
      • Citizens, public, NGO
      B2P009: Other
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P010: Synergies between the fields of activities
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      B2P011: Available facilities to test urban configurations in PED Lab
      B2P011: Other
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      B2P012: Incubation capacities of PED Lab
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
      B2P013: Availability of the facilities for external people
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      B2P014: Monitoring measures
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      B2P015: Key Performance indicators
      • Energy,
      • Environmental,
      • Social,
      • Economical / Financial
      B2P016: Execution of operations
      B2P016: Execution of operations
      B2P017: Capacities
      B2P017: Capacities
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
      B2P018: Relations with stakeholders
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P019: Available tools
      • Energy modelling
      B2P019: Available tools
      B2P020: External accessibility
      B2P020: External accessibilityTo follow the lab and Vantaa's activities in Neutralpath, fill in the following form: https://neutralpath.eu/fi/tayta-lomake-liittyaksesi-cn-labiin/
      C1P001: Unlocking Factors
      C1P001: Recent technological improvements for on-site RES production5 - Very important2 - Slightly important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P001: Innovative, integrated, prefabricated packages for buildings envelope / Energy efficiency of building stock5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P001: Energy Communities, P2P, Prosumers concepts5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Storage systems and E-mobility market penetration3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Decreasing costs of innovative materials4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P001: Financial mechanisms to reduce costs and maximize benefits4 - Important4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P001: The ability to predict Multiple Benefits2 - Slightly important4 - Important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P001: The ability to predict the distribution of benefits and impacts4 - Important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P001: Citizens improved awareness and engagement on sustainable energy issues (bottom-up)5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important
      C1P001: Social acceptance (top-down)5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P001: Improved local and national policy frameworks (i.e. incentives, laws etc.)3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P001: Presence of integrated urban strategies and plans3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P001: Multidisciplinary approaches available for systemic integration3 - Moderately important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P001: Availability of grants (from EC or other donors) to finance the PED Lab projects4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P001: Availability of RES on site (Local RES)2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P001: Ongoing or established collaboration on Public Private Partnership among key stakeholders4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P001: Any other UNLOCKING FACTORS (if any)Real-estate market situation
      C1P002: Driving Factors
      C1P002: Climate Change adaptation need4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P002: Climate Change mitigation need (local RES production and efficiency)5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P002: Rapid urbanization trend and need of urban expansions1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important5 - Very important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P002: Urban re-development of existing built environment3 - Moderately important5 - Very important5 - Very important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P002: Economic growth need2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P002: Improved local environmental quality (air, noise, aesthetics, etc.)3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important4 - Important5 - Very important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P002: Territorial and market attractiveness2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P002: Energy autonomy/independence5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P002: Any other DRIVING FACTOR (if any)
      C1P003: Administrative barriers
      C1P003: Difficulty in the coordination of high number of partners and authorities4 - Important4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P003: Lack of good cooperation and acceptance among partners3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P003: Lack of public participation3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P003: Lack of institutions/mechanisms to disseminate information3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P003:Long and complex procedures for authorization of project activities5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P003: Time consuming requirements by EC or other donors concerning reporting and accountancy4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P003: Complicated and non-comprehensive public procurement4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P003: Fragmented and or complex ownership structure3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P003: City administration & cross-sectoral attitude/approaches (silos)3 - Moderately important5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P003: Lack of internal capacities to support energy transition3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P003: Any other Administrative BARRIER (if any)Delay in the Environmental Dialogue processing in the municipality
      C1P004: Policy barriers
      C1P004: Lack of long-term and consistent energy plans and policies4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P004: Lacking or fragmented local political commitment and support on the long term4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P004: Lack of Cooperation & support between national-regional-local entities3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P004: Any other Political BARRIER (if any)
      C1P005: Legal and Regulatory barriers
      C1P005: Inadequate regulations for new technologies4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P005: Regulatory instability3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P005: Non-effective regulations4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P005: Unfavorable local regulations for innovative technologies3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P005: Building code and land-use planning hindering innovative technologies4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P005: Insufficient or insecure financial incentives4 - Important4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P005: Unresolved privacy concerns and limiting nature of privacy protection regulation4 - Important3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P005: Shortage of proven and tested solutions and examples2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P005: Any other Legal and Regulatory BARRIER (if any)
      C1P006: Environmental barriers
      C1P006: Environmental barriers- Climate Variability: 5 - Topographical Constraints: 4 - Sunlight Availability: 5 - Environmental Regulations: 3 - Zoning Restrictions: 2 - Air and Water Pollution: 2 - Natural Disasters: 1 - Water Scarcity: 1
      C1P007: Technical barriers
      C1P007: Lack of skilled and trained personnel4 - Important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P007: Deficient planning3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P007: Retrofitting work in dwellings in occupied state4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P007: Lack of well-defined process4 - Important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P007: Inaccuracy in energy modelling and simulation4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P007: Lack/cost of computational scalability4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P007: Grid congestion, grid instability4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P007: Negative effects of project intervention on the natural environment3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P007: Energy retrofitting work in dense and/or historical urban environment5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P007: Difficult definition of system boundaries3 - Moderately important5 - Very important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P007: Any other Thecnical BARRIER (if any)
      C1P008: Social and Cultural barriers
      C1P008: Inertia4 - Important2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P008: Lack of values and interest in energy optimization measurements5 - Very important2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P008: Low acceptance of new projects and technologies5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P008: Difficulty of finding and engaging relevant actors5 - Very important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P008: Lack of trust beyond social network4 - Important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P008: Rebound effect4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards environmentalism5 - Very important2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P008: Exclusion of socially disadvantaged groups2 - Slightly important3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P008: Non-energy issues are more important and urgent for actors3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P008: Hostile or passive attitude towards energy collaboration1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P008: Any other Social BARRIER (if any)
      C1P009: Information and Awareness barriers
      C1P009: Insufficient information on the part of potential users and consumers2 - Slightly important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P009: Perception of interventions as complicated and expensive, with negative socio-economic or environmental impacts5 - Very important1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P009: Lack of awareness among authorities3 - Moderately important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P009: Information asymmetry causing power asymmetry of established actors4 - Important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P009: High costs of design, material, construction, and installation3 - Moderately important4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P009: Any other Information and Awareness BARRIER (if any)
      C1P010: Financial barriers
      C1P010: Hidden costs4 - Important3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P010: Insufficient external financial support and funding for project activities3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P010: Economic crisis1 - Unimportant2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P010: Risk and uncertainty5 - Very important4 - Important5 - Very important4 - Important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P010: Lack of consolidated and tested business models4 - Important5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant4 - Important
      C1P010: Limited access to capital and cost disincentives2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P010: Any other Financial BARRIER (if any)
      C1P011: Market barriers
      C1P011: Split incentives2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant4 - Important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P011: Energy price distortion2 - Slightly important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important
      C1P011: Energy market concentration, gatekeeper actors (DSOs)3 - Moderately important2 - Slightly important1 - Unimportant5 - Very important1 - Unimportant3 - Moderately important
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant1 - Unimportant
      C1P011: Any other Market BARRIER (if any)
      C1P012: Stakeholders involved
      C1P012: Government/Public Authorities
      • Planning/leading
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      C1P012: Research & Innovation
      • Design/demand aggregation
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Financial/Funding
      C1P012: Analyst, ICT and Big Data
      • Design/demand aggregation
      C1P012: Business process management
      C1P012: Urban Services providers
      C1P012: Real Estate developers
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Planning/leading,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Design/Construction companies
      • Construction/implementation
      • Planning/leading,
      • Design/demand aggregation
      C1P012: End‐users/Occupants/Energy Citizens
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      • Design/demand aggregation,
      • Construction/implementation,
      • Monitoring/operation/management
      C1P012: Social/Civil Society/NGOs
      C1P012: Industry/SME/eCommerce
      • Construction/implementation
      C1P012: Other
      C1P012: Other (if any)
      Summary

      Authors (framework concept)

      Beril Alpagut (Demir Energy); Giulia Turci (University of Bologna); Michal Kuzmic (Czech Technical University in Prague); Paolo Civiero (Università Roma Tre); Serena Pagliulia (University of Bologna); Oscar Seco (CIEMAT); Silvia Soutullo (CIEMAT); Daniele Vettorato (EURAC Research, IEA Annex 83); Bailador Ferreras M. Almudena (CIEMAT); Vicky Albert-Seifried (FHG ISE)

      Contributors (to the content)

      Laura Aelenei (LNEG), Nienke Maas (TNO), Savis Gohari (OsloMet), Andras Reith (ABUD), Ghazal Etminan (AIT), Maria-Beatrice Andreucci (Universita Sapienza), Francesco Reda (VTT, IEA Annex 83), Mari Hukkalainen (VTT), Judith-Borsboom (Locality), Gilda Massa (ENEA), Jelena Ziemele (University of Latvia), Nikola Pokorny (CVUT), Sergio Diaz de Garayo Balsategui (CENER, IEA Annex 83), Matthias Haaze (ZHAW, IEA Annex 83), Christoph Gollner (FFG, JPI UE), Silvia Bossi (ENEA, JPI UE), Christian Winzer (Zurich University of Applied Science), George Martinopoulos (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas), Maria Nuria Sánchez (CIEMAT), Angelina Tomova (Energy Agency of Plovdiv)

      Implemented by

      Boutik.pt: Filipe Martins, Jamal Khan
      Marek Suchánek (Czech Technical University in Prague)

      Join the Action

      PED-EU-NET is an open, interdisciplinary and growing network welcoming academics, practitioners and relevant stakeholders to contribute to the activities of the work plan.
      Join Now

      COST

      COST is an EU funding programme that enables researchers to set up their interdisciplinary research networks in Europe and beyond. We provide funds for organising conferences, meetings, training schools, short scientific exchanges or other networking activities in a wide range of scientific topics. By creating open spaces where people and ideas can grow, we unlock the full potential of science.

      PED-EU-NET

      The COST Action Positive Energy Districts European Network (PED-EU-NET) aims to mobilise researchers and other relevant stakeholders across different domains and sectors to drive the deployment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) in Europe through open sharing of knowledge, exchange of ideas, pooling of resources, experimentation of new methods and co-creation of novel solutions.

      Action Details

      Grant Holder
      Department of Planning, Design, Technology of Architecture, Sapienza University of Rome

      Start of Action: 10 September 2020
      End of Action: 09 September 2024
      CSO approval date: 24/03/2020

      © 2021-2023 PED-EU-NET COST Action CA19126. All rights reserved.